Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Attosecond All-Optical Retrieval of Valley Polarization via Circular Dichroism in Transient Absorption

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the difference in absorption of two circularly polarized attosecond probe pulses is proportional to the valley population imbalance in a 2D hexagonal material, enabling quantitative retrieval of valley polarization…

desk verdict A genuinely new all-optical valley-polarization readout idea, backed by clean TDDFT numerics, but the 250 as resolution claim is overstated and the central derivation lives in the SM. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19612 v1 pith:JAULEWZG submitted 2024-12-27 physics.optics

Wenqing Li , Xiaosong Zhu , Pengfei Lan , Kai Wang , Wanzhu He , Hannes Hübener , Umberto De Giovannini , Peixiang Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords valleypolarizationattosecondtransientabsorptioncirculardichroismtwo-dimensionalhexagonalmaterialsultrafastdynamicstime-dependentdensityfunctionaltheoryh-BNMoS2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes an all-optical scheme that measures valley polarization in two-dimensional hexagonal materials with sub-femtosecond time resolution. The central idea is that two circularly polarized attosecond probe pulses with opposite helicities absorb differently by an amount proportional to the valley population imbalance in the first conduction band. That proportionality turns transient absorption spectroscopy into a direct, quantitative readout of valley polarization dynamics, including the brief switching events between valleys. The authors demonstrate the scheme in time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) simulations for h-BN and MoS2, retrieving valley polarization dynamics with a 250 attosecond time step. If the claim holds, it gives quantum materials researchers an all-optical, quantitative probe of valley dynamics at timescales that were previously out of reach.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is Eq. (1), $\Delta\mu = \mu_+ - \mu_- \propto N^{K_1}_{\mathrm{CB1}} - N^{K_2}_{\mathrm{CB1}}$, which maps the valley population imbalance onto a difference in absorption coefficients for the two probe helicities. The mechanism that makes the identity hold is the valley-selective circular dichroism transition from the first conduction band (CB1) to a higher conduction band (CB2), whose momentum matrix elements for the two helicities are equal in magnitude but couple to opposite valleys. This transition converts the population imbalance into an optical asymmetry, while the large CB1–CB2 energy separation supports the attosecond probe duration needed for sub-femtosecond time resolution.

What would settle it

Perform the same pump-probe simulation on a material with slightly broken K/K' symmetry, such as a strained h-BN monolayer, and check whether the proportionality constant in Eq. (1) stays time-independent when the directly counted $\Delta N_{\mathrm{CB1}}$ is compared with $\Delta\mu$; a drift would show that the linear mapping is not universal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, expressed as Eq. (1), is that the circular dichroism $\Delta\mu = \mu_+ - \mu_-$ of two opposite-helicity probe pulses is proportional to the instantaneous valley population imbalance $\Delta N_{\mathrm{CB1}} = N^{K_1}_{\mathrm{CB1}} - N^{K_2}_{\mathrm{CB1}}$ in the first conduction band. The proportionality arises because the probe couples the first and second conduction bands in a valley-selective way, so a prepared valley-polarization state makes one helicity excite more electrons than the other. The authors verify the linear mapping numerically for h-BN and MoS2 by varying the pump strength and fitting $\Delta\mu$ at the CB1–CB2 resonance against the directly counted $\Delta N_{\mathrm{CB1}}$. They then use the mapping to retrieve the time-dependent valley polarization during multi-pulse switching sequences, resolving the switching steps with 250 as resolution.

Load-bearing premise

The retrieval assumes that the CB1-to-CB2 transition has equal matrix-element magnitudes for the two probe helicities at the K1 and K2 valleys, so that any absorption asymmetry comes purely from the valley population imbalance and not from material-specific differences in transition strength.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Valley polarization dynamics can be retrieved quantitatively from a single differential absorption measurement, without requiring a separate electron-spectroscopy probe during the ultrafast evolution.
  • The 250 as delay step resolves the transient switching of valley polarization between the K1 and K2 valleys, not merely the polarization state after switching has completed.
  • The linear mapping is confirmed for two different materials, h-BN and MoS2, indicating the scheme transfers to other 2D hexagonal materials with valley-contrasting band structure.
  • With one auxiliary absolute measurement (e.g., ARPES) under static or slowly varying valley polarization, the proportionality constant can be calibrated, making the ultrafast valley-polarization readout absolute.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same circular-dichroism observable at the CB1–CB2 resonance could be used to monitor spin-valley locking in transition-metal dichalcogenides, provided the spin-split matrix elements still obey the equality assumed in Eq. (1); this extension would need explicit verification.
  • A residual $\Delta\mu$ in an unpolarized or symmetrically pumped sample would expose intrinsic asymmetry in the CB1–CB2 transition strengths, offering a clean experimental test of the load-bearing assumption.
  • Because the probe photon energies lie in the ultraviolet/XUV range (7.5 eV for h-BN, 35 eV for MoS2), excitonic and many-body effects may alter the CB1–CB2 oscillator strengths; including them could change the proportionality constant and would need to be checked in a full many-body treatment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an all-optical scheme for retrieving valley polarization (VP) dynamics in two-dimensional hexagonal materials using attosecond circular dichroism (CD) in transient absorption. The central idea, expressed in Eq. (1), is that the difference in absorption coefficients for left- and right-circularly polarized probe pulses, Δμ = μ⁺ − μ⁻, is proportional to the CB1 population imbalance between the K1 and K2 valleys, ΔN_CB1. The scheme is demonstrated numerically with TDDFT (Octopus) for h-BN and MoS₂: a circularly polarized pump creates VP, and a 1-fs sin²-envelope probe with photon energy matching the CB1–CB2 gap produces a CD signal whose magnitude follows the VP dynamics. The manuscript reports retrieval of transient VP switching events with a claimed 250-as time resolution.

Significance. If the central mapping of Eq. (1) is valid, the scheme offers a direct, quantitative, all-optical readout of valley polarization on sub-femtosecond timescales, complementing or surpassing existing photoluminescence, Kerr rotation, and high-harmonic spectroscopy approaches. The paper's strengths include the explicit linear relationship between an observable and the valley population imbalance, the use of ab initio TDDFT simulations for two prototypical materials, a clear calibration procedure via one auxiliary ARPES measurement, and a visually convincing demonstration that the retrieved signal tracks the simulated VP in both h-BN and MoS₂. These features make the core proposal attractive. However, the manuscript's headline claim of 250-as temporal resolution is not supported by the evidence presented, and the derivation of the central proportionality is relegated to the Supplemental Material.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2(e), Fig. 3(e)–(f), and the concluding paragraph] The claim of '250 as time resolution' is not established. The curves in Fig. 2(e) for probe delays of 7.5 fs and 7.75 fs show that two probe pulses with a 250-as delay difference produce different time-integrated CB2 populations, which is a trivial consequence of the delay. This does not demonstrate the ability to resolve two VP features that are separated by 250 as in time. For a weak probe, transient absorption is to first approximation a convolution of the pump-induced change with the probe envelope, so the instrument response is limited by the probe duration, here T_probe = 1 fs (FWHM ≈ 0.5 fs), unless a deconvolution or nonlinear correlation scheme is provided. The statement that the large CB1–CB2 energy separation 'supports subfemtosecond time resolution' conflates spectral separation with temporal resolution. I recommend either providing a two-feature test that actually resolves two VP events separated by 250 as, or replacing '250 as time resolution' in the abstract and conclusions with claims about a 250-as delay sampling step and explicitly stating that the temporal resolution is limited by the probe duration.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Sec. I of the Supplemental Material] The central proportionality Δμ ∝ N_CB1^K1 − N_CB1^K2 is stated in Eq. (1) but its derivation is deferred to the Supplemental Material. As submitted, the main text does not contain the assumptions and steps leading to this relation, making the central claim difficult to verify. In particular, the derivation must establish that the CB1–CB2 transition is perfectly valley-selective with equal matrix-element magnitudes at K1 and K2 for the two helicities, and that any helicity-dependent background or off-resonant contribution is absent or negligible. Please include the derivation in the manuscript (or ensure the Supplemental Material is part of the submission) and state explicitly the conditions under which Eq. (1) holds.
  3. [Sec. IV and Fig. 2(f), Fig. 4(b)] The quantitative retrieval relies on the proportionality constant in Eq. (1) being time-independent and identical for the pump-driven dynamics. The linear fits in Fig. 2(f) and Fig. 4(b) are performed for VP states prepared with different pump strengths, which is not the same as verifying that the proportionality holds dynamically during the switching process, where the pump pulse is present, band populations change, and field dressing may modify transition matrix elements. The manuscript should address whether the calibration constant obtained in a static or slowly varying VP condition remains valid during the sub-femtosecond switching transients, or alternatively restrict the quantitative retrieval claims to the post-switching regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and conclusion] The phrase 'unprecedented quantitative retrieval ... with a time resolution of 250 as' should be softened unless the temporal-resolution concern raised above is resolved; at present it overstates what the simulations show.
  2. [Fig. 3(b) label] The label 'Populaion' in Fig. 3(b) contains a typo; it should read 'Population'.
  3. [Fig. 4(a) caption] The units of the vector potential in Fig. 4(a) are not specified in the caption; please add the appropriate units or state that atomic units are used.
  4. [Notation near Eq. (1)] The terms N_CB1^K1 and N_CB1^K2 are defined in the text, but the superscripts are used inconsistently in places (e.g., 'K1(K2)' and 'K1' vs 'K1'); please harmonize the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Δμ ∝ ΔN relation is a derived physical mapping and the TDDFT demonstration uses independent observables, not data fitted to the target.

full rationale

The central claim is that the circular-dichroism transient-absorption signal Δμ = μ+ − μ− is proportional to the valley-population imbalance ΔN_CB1 (Eq. 1). The paper states this is derived in Sec. I of the Supplemental Material, and the main-text validation (Fig. 2(f)) varies the pump amplitude to prepare states with different ΔN_CB1 and computes Δμ at 7.5 eV from the TDDFT absorption spectra, then shows a linear fit. This is a calibration/validation across independent realizations, not a fit of the retrieval target: the Δμ values are obtained from the probe response of the simulation and the ΔN values from momentum-resolved population integration, so the linear relation is not imposed by construction. The retrieval demonstration in Figs. 3 and 4 compares the delay-dependent Δμ slice with the independently computed ΔN_CB1 from the same TDDFT propagation; this is a self-consistency check within a first-principles simulation, which is appropriate for a theoretical proposal, and it does not reduce to renaming the input because the observable and the target are computed through different channels. Self-citations are present (e.g., Refs. [29], [41], [42]) but they support standard techniques (bi-circular pump fields, momentum-matrix-element expressions) and are not load-bearing for the proportionality or the retrieval. The 250 as time-resolution claim is arguably over-stated given the 1 fs probe envelope, but that is an evidential/support concern, not circularity: no equation in the paper defines the resolution as the delay step, and the claim is not used as an input to derive the retrieval. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is repackaged as new. Hence no significant circularity; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The scheme introduces no new particles or forces. Its free parameters are a calibration constant and a valley-counting radius. The main burden rests on TDDFT as the dynamical model and on perfect valley-selective CB1-to-CB2 transitions, both domain assumptions rather than argued first principles.

free parameters (2)
  • Proportionality constant C in Δμ = C·ΔN_CB1 = not stated numerically; slope of linear fit in Fig. 2(f)
    The quantitative retrieval of the absolute VP requires this constant; the paper says it can be calibrated by an auxiliary ARPES measurement. In the numerical demonstration it is effectively read off from the same TDDFT data.
  • Valley integration radius R = one-third of the distance between neighboring valleys
    Used to define N^K_CB1 by integrating momentum-resolved CB1 population in a circle around each valley; the numerical value of ΔN_CB1 and hence the retrieved VP depends on this arbitrary choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Electron dynamics are accurately described by adiabatic TDDFT with the PBE exchange-correlation functional.
    The paper's simulations and the mapping in Eq. (1) assume single-particle Kohn-Sham dynamics capture the relevant interband excitations; excitonic, self-energy, and non-adiabatic corrections are not included.
  • domain assumption The CB1-to-CB2 transition is perfectly valley-selective with equal matrix-element magnitudes at K1 and K2 for opposite helicities.
    This ensures Δμ measures only population imbalance. It is supported numerically for h-BN in Fig. 2(a,b) and assumed for MoS2 and general materials.
  • domain assumption The probe pulses are weak and do not change the CB1 populations; CB2 is empty before probing.
    The linear spectator probe assumption underlies Eq. (1); strong-field excitation or depletion would break proportionality.
  • domain assumption No relaxation or dephasing occurs over the 20 fs protocol.
    The paper states the protocol is one order of magnitude shorter than valley lifetimes, so coherent dynamics are assumed to dominate. Dephasing would blur the retrieved dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Attosecond All-Optical Retrieval of Valley Polarization via Circular Dichroism in Transient Absorption." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JAULEWZG

@misc{pith2026241219612,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Attosecond All-Optical Retrieval of Valley Polarization via Circular Dichroism in Transient Absorption},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JAULEWZG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19612}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a scheme for retrieving the ultrafast valley polarization (VP) dynamics in two-dimensional hexagonal materials via attosecond circular dichroism (CD) transient absorption spectroscopy. This approach builds on the CD transition between the first and higher conduction bands induced by the circularly polarized probe pulses. The population imbalance at nonequivalent valleys in the first conduction band is proportionally mapped onto the difference in absorption coefficients of two probe pulses with opposite helicities, supporting an unprecedented quantitative retrieval of the corresponding VP dynamics with subfemtosecond time resolution. We theoretically demonstrate the scheme for h-BN and MoS2 through ab initio calculations, achieving an accurate retrieval of the VP dynamics, particularly the transient VP switching processes, with a time resolution of 250 as.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19612 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the scheme. (a) The pump pulse (red line) manipulates the VP in 2D hexagonal material, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) (b) The squared modulus of momentum matrix elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Retrieval of the ultrafast VP dynamics in h-BN. (a) The vector potential of the switching pulses given in atomic units [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Retrieval of the ultrafast VP dynamics in MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Instantaneous optical selection rule for independent control of valley currents

    physics.optics 2025-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A sub-cycle optical selection rule links instantaneous light chirality to valley selectivity, enabling independent control of valley currents.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16055 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    S. A. Vitale, D. Nezich, J. O. Varghese, P. Kim, N. Gedik, P. Jarillo-Herrero, D. Xiao, and M. Rothschild, Small 14, 1801483 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    S. A. Oliaei Motlagh, J.-S. Wu, V. Apalkov, and M. I. Stockman, Phys. Rev. B 98, 081406 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    R. E. F. Silva, M. Ivanov, and ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, Opt. Express30, 30347 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R

    ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Nat. Photon.14, 728 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R

    ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Optica8, 277 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    M. S. Mrudul, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Optica8, 422 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Sharma, P

    S. Sharma, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Optica 9, 947 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Tyulnev, ´A

    I. Tyulnev, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, J. Poborska, L. Vamos, P. S. J. Russell, F. Tani, O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov, R. E. F. Silva, and J. Biegert, Nature 628, 746 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Mitra, ´A

    S. Mitra, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Aulich, M. Neuhaus, R. E. F. Silva, V. Pervak, M. F. Kling, and S. Biswas, Nature628, 752 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    H. Zeng, J. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and X. Cui, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Hsu, Y.-L

    W.-T. Hsu, Y.-L. Chen, C.-H. Chen, P.-S. Liu, T.-H. Hou, L.-J. Li, and W.-H. Chang, Nat. Commun. 6, 8963 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Q. Wang, S. Ge, X. Li, J. Qiu, Y. Ji, J. Feng, and D. Sun, ACS Nano 7, 11087 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Kumar, J

    N. Kumar, J. He, D. He, Y. Wang, and H. Zhao, Nanoscale 6, 12690 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    C. Mai, Y. G. Semenov, A. Barrette, Y. Yu, Z. Jin, L. Cao, K. W. Kim, and K. Gundogdu, Phys. Rev. B 90, 041414 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Bertoni, C

    R. Bertoni, C. Nicholson, L. Waldecker, H. H¨ ubener, C. Monney, U. De Giovannini, M. Puppin, M. Hoesch, E. Springate, R. Chapman, C. Cacho, M. Wolf, A. Rubio, and R. Ernstorfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 277201 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    H. K. Avetissian, V. A. Sedrakyan, K. V. Sedrakian, and G. F. Mkrtchian, Phys. Rev. B 107, 205403 (2023). 7

    2023

  13. [21]

    Herrmann, S

    P. Herrmann, S. Klimmer, T. Lettau, M. Monfared, I. Staude, I. Paradisanos, U. Peschel, and G. Soavi, Small 19, 2301126 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Z. Wang, A. Molina-S´ anchez, P. Altmann, D. Sangalli, D. De Fazio, G. Soavi, U. Sassi, F. Bottegoni, F. Ciccacci, M. Finazzi, L. Wirtz, A. C. Ferrari, A. Marini, G. Cerullo, and S. Dal Conte, Nano Lett. 18, 6882 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Neufeld, N

    O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031011 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Rana and G

    N. Rana and G. Dixit, Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034056 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    M. Wu, S. Chen, S. Camp, K. J. Schafer, and M. B. Gaarde, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 062003 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    J. J. Rørstad, J. E. Bækhøj, and L. B. Madsen, Phys. Rev. A 96, 013430 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Fazzi, F

    D. Fazzi, F. Scotognella, A. Milani, D. Brida, C. Manzoni, E. Cinquanta, M. Devetta, L. Ravagnan, P. Milani, F. Cataldo, L. L¨ uer, R. Wannemacher, J. Cabanillas-Gonzalez, M. Negro, S. Stagira, and C. Vozzi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 9384 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    O. Kfir, P. Grychtol, E. Turgut, R. Knut, D. Zusin, D. Popmintchev, T. Popmintchev, H. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, A. Fleis- cher, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, and O. Cohen, Nat. Photon. 9, 99 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    X. Zhu, P. Lu, and M. Lein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 030401 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Geondzhian, A

    A. Geondzhian, A. Rubio, and M. Altarelli, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115433 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Feldman, M

    M. Feldman, M. Even Tzur, and O. Cohen, Photonics 11, 918 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Siegrist, J

    F. Siegrist, J. A. Gessner, M. Ossiander, C. Denker, Y.-P. Chang, M. C. Schr¨ oder, A. Guggenmos, Y. Cui, J. Walowski, U. Martens, J. K. Dewhurst, U. Kleineberg, M. M¨ unzenberg, S. Sharma, and M. Schultze, Nature 571, 240 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Han, J.-B

    M. Han, J.-B. Ji, K. Ueda, and H. J. W¨ orner, Optica 10, 1044 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    G´ eneaux, H.-T

    R. G´ eneaux, H.-T. Chang, A. Guggenmos, R. Delaunay, F. L´ egar´ e, K. L´ egar´ e, J. L¨ uning, T. Parpiiev, I. J. Molesky, B. R. de Roulet, M. W. Zuerch, S. Sharma, M. Schultze, and S. R. Leone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106902 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    See Supplemental Material for a detailed derivation of our scheme and details of the simulations, which includes Refs.[36– 39, 44–51]

  28. [36]

    Marques, Comput

    M. Marques, Comput. Phys. Commun. 151, 60 (2003)

    2003

  29. [37]

    Castro, H

    A. Castro, H. Appel, M. Oliveira, C. A. Rozzi, X. Andrade, F. Lorenzen, M. A. L. Marques, E. K. U. Gross, and A. Rubio, Phys. Status Solidi B 243, 2465 (2006)

    2006

  30. [38]

    Andrade, D

    X. Andrade, D. Strubbe, U. De Giovannini, A. H. Larsen, M. J. T. Oliveira, J. Alberdi-Rodriguez, A. Varas, I. Theophilou, N. Helbig, M. J. Verstraete, L. Stella, F. Nogueira, A. Aspuru-Guzik, A. Castro, M. A. L. Marques, and A. Rubio, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 31371 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Tancogne-Dejean, M

    N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. J. T. Oliveira, X. Andrade, H. Appel, C. H. Borca, G. Le Breton, F. Buchholz, A. Castro, S. Corni, A. A. Correa, U. De Giovannini, A. Delgado, F. G. Eich, J. Flick, G. Gil, A. Gomez, N. Helbig, H. H¨ ubener, R. Jest¨ adt, J. Jornet-Somoza, A. H. Larsen, ...

    2020

  32. [40]

    T. C. Berkelbach, M. S. Hybertsen, and D. R. Reichman, Phys. Rev. B 92, 085413 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, T. Huang, Q. Zhang, M. Lein, and P. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 193901 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, and P. Lu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 116401 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Lively, S

    K. Lively, S. A. Sato, G. Albareda, A. Rubio, and A. Kelly, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013069 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  37. [45]

    Schlipf and F

    M. Schlipf and F. Gygi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 36 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    S. A. Sato, Comput. Mater. Sci. 194, 110274 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Tancogne-Dejean, M

    N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. A. Sentef, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. B 102, 115106 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    M. B. Gaarde, C. Buth, J. L. Tate, and K. J. Schafer, Phys. Rev. A 83, 013419 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Yamada, K

    S. Yamada, K. Yabana, and T. Otobe, Phys. Rev. B 108, 035404 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    S. M. Cavaletto and L. B. Madsen, Phys. Rev. A 110, 053111 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    S. A. Sato, Electron. Struct. 4, 014007 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.