Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 2 cited by

Operator estimates in homogenization of L\'evy-type operators with periodic coefficients

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Theorem 5.1 of this paper establishes that the resolvent of a periodic Lévy-type operator converges in the L2 operator norm to the resolvent of a constant-coefficient fractional Laplacian, with rate ε^α for 0<α<1, ε(1+|ln ε|)^2 for α=1…

desk verdict Solid operator-norm homogenization rates for singular Lévy-type kernels; the contour-integral threshold analysis is the real contribution — deserves serious refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20408 v1 pith:73BD6ERH submitted 2024-12-29 math.AP math.FA

Andrey Piatnitski , Vladimir Sloushch , Tatiana Suslina , Elena Zhizhina This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.FA MSC 35B2735R1147A1060J7647D08
keywords Lévy-typeoperatorsperiodichomogenizationoperatorestimatesresolventconvergencefractionalLaplacianGelfandtransformspectralthresholdnonlocal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves the first operator-norm resolvent estimates for homogenization of nonlocal Lévy-type operators with periodic coefficients. The operator is defined by a symmetric kernel μ(x/ε,y/ε)|x−y|^{−d−α} with 0<α<2, and the paper shows that as ε→0 its resolvent converges in the L2 operator norm to the resolvent of the effective fractional Laplacian μ0 c0(d,α)(−Δ)^{α/2}. The discrepancy is bounded by O(ε^α) for 0<α<1, by O(ε(1+|ln ε|)^2) for α=1, and by O($ε^{{2−α}}$) for 1<α<2. This matters because it extends sharp operator-estimate technology from local elliptic homogenization to genuinely nonlocal jump operators whose symbol is not analytic, and it identifies the homogenized limit explicitly as a constant-coefficient fractional Laplacian with coefficient equal to the mean of μ.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the direct-integral (Gelfand) decomposition of the periodic operator into fiber operators A(ξ) on L2([0,1)^d), combined with a contour-integral approximation of the spectral projection F(ξ) and of A(ξ)F(ξ) near the spectral edge. Because the coefficient is uniformly positive, the first eigenvalue of A(ξ) is of order |ξ|^α while the rest of the spectrum is bounded below by a positive constant; this spectral gap lets the paper replace, for small |ξ|, the fiber resolvent by (μ0 Vα(ξ)+ε^α)^{-1}P. The non-analyticity of the symbol (for 0<α<1 the fiber family is not even differentiable) is handled by direct kernel estimates and by a form-resolvent identity for 1≤α<2. The paper's main quantitative ingredients are Proposition 3.1 (the spectral gap), Propositions 3.2–3.9 (approximation of F(ξ) and A(ξ)F(ξ)), and Theorem 4.2 (fiber resolvent approximation).

What would settle it

Take a periodic coefficient μ with μ(x,y)≥0 that vanishes on an open set of positive measure and compute the fiber eigenvalues of A(ξ) numerically: if the second eigenvalue tends to zero as ξ→0, the spectral-gap bound in Proposition 3.1 fails. Alternatively, for α=3/2 with a chosen nonconstant periodic μ, estimate the L2 operator norm of (Aε+I)^{-1}−(A0+I)^{-1} numerically and check whether it decays like $ε^{{1/2}}$; a visibly different exponent or non-convergence would falsify the claimed rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that homogenization of the periodic nonlocal operator (Aεu)(x)=∫ μ(x/ε,y/ε)(u(x)−u(y))/|x−y|^{d+α} dy is a spectral-threshold phenomenon with a quantitative rate. The main theorem states exactly that the norm of (Aε+I)^{-1}−(A0+I)^{-1} acting on L2(R^d) is at most C(α,μ)ε^α for 0<α<1, at most C(α,μ)ε(1+|ln ε|)^2 for α=1, and at most C(α,μ)$ε^{{2−α}}$ for 1<α<2, where A0 = μ0 c0(d,α)(−Δ)^{α/2} and μ0 is the mean of μ over two period cells. This is Theorem 5.1, derived by scaling to a fixed operator, applying the Gelfand transform to decompose into fiber operators A(ξ), and approximating the fiber resolvents near the bottom of the spectrum by explicitly computable threshold quantities.

Load-bearing premise

The whole rate estimate depends on the coefficient μ being bounded below by a positive constant everywhere, so that each fiber operator has a uniform spectral gap separating its first eigenvalue from the rest of the spectrum; if μ could vanish on a set of positive measure, that gap and the contour-integral approximation would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The homogenized effective operator is explicit: pure fractional Laplacian with constant coefficient μ0, so the limit operator is known without solving auxiliary cell problems.
  • Strong resolvent convergence is upgraded to norm resolvent convergence with explicit, dimension-dependent rates that degrade as α crosses 1 and approaches 2.
  • For 0<α<1 the rate O(ε^α) is the best possible within the threshold-edge method, since the resolvent difference contains a term of this size coming from the spectral projection gap.
  • The logarithmic factor (1+|ln ε|)^2 appears only in the borderline case α=1, where the difference-kernel estimates acquire a logarithmic divergence.
  • The result extends to arbitrary periodic lattices in R^d, with constants depending additionally on the lattice, as noted in the paper's concluding remarks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to build correctors for 1≤α<2, which would likely improve the rate O(ε^{2−α}) toward something like O(ε^2) or O(ε^2|ln ε|^2); the paper explicitly states that this is planned separate work.
  • The uniform lower bound μ_->0 is the Achilles heel: if μ can vanish on a set of positive measure, the spectral-gap argument in Proposition 3.1 collapses, and the effective operator may no longer be a constant-coefficient fractional Laplacian.
  • The same contour-integral threshold technique could be adapted to other nonlocal kernels with Hölder-regular symbols, such as truncated stable-like kernels or finite-range jump generators, provided a spectral gap can be established.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proves operator-norm resolvent estimates for the periodic homogenization of symmetric Lévy-type operators with non-integrable kernels in L2(R^d). Under the stated assumptions (0<α<2, periodicity and symmetry of μ, and the uniform bounds 0<μ_-≤μ≤μ_+), Theorem 5.1 establishes ||(A_ε+I)^{-1}-(A_0+I)^{-1}|| ≤ C ε^α for 0<α<1, C ε(1+|ln ε|)^2 for α=1, and C ε^{2-α} for 1<α<2, where the effective operator is A_0=μ_0 c_0(d,α)(-Δ)^{α/2} and μ_0 is the double average of μ. The proof combines the scaling identity (0.6), the Gelfand transform, a threshold analysis of the fiber operators A(ξ), contour-integral approximations of the spectral projection F(ξ) and of A(ξ)F(ξ), and direct-integral estimates. The effective coefficient is derived directly as the average of μ rather than assumed or fitted.

Significance. If correct, this is the first operator-norm homogenization estimate for Lévy-type operators with non-integrable kernels, upgrading the strong resolvent convergence of the prior work [14] to explicit rates. The proof is detailed and internally coherent; the constants are tracked and depend only on d, α, μ_-, and μ_+. The uniform lower bound μ_->0 is explicit and load-bearing: it creates the spectral gap used in Proposition 3.1, as the stress-test note observes. The paper also credits its own limitations honestly, noting in §5.2 that for α∈[1,2) the rates are not expected to be optimal and that corrector terms are deferred to future work. The effective operator is not fitted: μ_0 is computed as the average of μ, and the leading threshold term is derived from ρ(ξ)=a(ξ)[1,1]. These features make the contribution solid and publishable.

minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.2, around (3.9)] Please define the contour Γ explicitly, for example as the boundary of the stadium of radius d_0/3 around the segment [0,d_0/3]; the phrase 'encloses the segment equidistantly' and the length formula l_Γ=d_0(2π+2)/3 are currently implicit and should be stated precisely.
  2. [Theorem 4.4, proof] The equality of the norm of the direct-integral operator with sup_{ξ∈~Ω} of the fiber norms should be justified, for instance by continuity of the fiber resolvents in ξ, or replaced by an essential supremum; the upper bound used in the proof only requires a uniform bound over ξ.
  3. [Theorem 4.2, case 1<α<2] The displayed estimate for Ξ(ξ,ε) leading to ε^{2-2α} is correct, but the factorization is difficult to follow; please state separately the elementary bounds |ξ|^{2-α}/(μ_-c_0|ξ|^α+ε^α)^{2/α-1} ≤ (μ_-c_0)^{-(2/α-1)} and (μ_-c_0|ξ|^α+ε^α)^{-(2-2/α)} ≤ ε^{2-2α}.
  4. [Proposition 3.3] In the sentence before (3.19), 'bounded in L2(Rd)' should read 'bounded in L2(Ω)'.
  5. [§5.2, remark 1] The statement that O(ε^α) is 'the best estimate that can be achieved if the homogenization process is interpreted as a threshold effect' is a statement about the method, not a proven lower bound for the resolvent discrepancy; please rephrase to avoid implying optimality of (5.1) without a lower-bound example.
  6. [Throughout] There are typographical errors, including 'strrightforward' in the proof of Theorem 4.3, 'Acknowlegements', and irregular spacing in 'L´ evy'; these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the effective coefficient is computed directly and the operator-norm rates follow from stated spectral-gap estimates, not from fitted inputs or loaded self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The effective coefficient mu0 is computed, not assumed, in Lemma 3.7: the paper expands rho(xi) = a(xi)[1,1] directly and obtains rho(xi) = mu0 V_alpha(xi) + rho_*(xi), where mu0 is the average of mu and rho_* is bounded in Lemma 3.8 as o(|xi|^alpha) uniformly in the required sense. Proposition 3.9 then combines the contour-integral threshold approximations with this computation; no term in the final rate estimate is imported from a fitted parameter or from the desired conclusion. The scaling identity (0.6) converts Theorem 4.4 into Theorem 5.1 by an exact unitary relation, and Theorem 4.4 itself follows from Theorem 4.2 via the Gelfand transform and resolvent bounds. The cited works [6], [14], [20], and [21] supply standard resolvent identities, prior strong-convergence context, and the method framework, but the operator-norm rate result is proved in this paper from the stated hypotheses (1.1)-(1.2). The uniform ellipticity condition mu_- > 0 is an explicit load-bearing assumption used to establish the spectral gap in Proposition 3.1, not a disguised version of the target theorem. The blow-up of constants as alpha approaches 1 or 2 is explained by the explicit constants, and the piecewise rates in (5.1) are dictated by the powers of |xi| and epsilon in the auxiliary estimates. Accordingly, no step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: all constants in the estimates are explicit functions of d, α, µ_- and µ_+. No new entities are postulated; the proof uses standard spectral objects such as resolvents and spectral projections. The only substantive input beyond standard theory is the strict coercivity and periodicity of µ.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Assumptions (1.1)-(1.2): µ is bounded with 0<µ_-≤µ≤µ_+<∞, symmetric in x and y, and Z^d-periodic in each variable.
    Standing hypotheses of Theorem 5.1; they make the quadratic form closed and ensure comparability with the fractional Laplacian form, used throughout Sections 1-3.
  • standard math Closed quadratic forms generate self-adjoint operators, and the Gelfand transform expands the periodic operator as a direct integral of fiber operators A(ξ).
    Used in Lemma 1.3, equation (1.17), and Theorem 4.4; standard spectral theory for periodic operators.
  • standard math Resolvent identity for operators generated by forms with a common domain: R(ξ,ζ)-R0(ζ)=-Υ(ζ)T(ξ)R(ξ,ζ), cited from [6, Ch.1,§2].
    Used in Propositions 3.4 and 3.5 for the case 1≤α<2, where ∆A(ξ) is not bounded.
  • standard math Fractional Laplacian Fourier multiplier formula Vα(k)=c0(d,α)|k|^α with the constant c0 given by (1.7), including the value from [16].
    Proved in Lemma 1.1 and used to compute eigenvalues of A0(ξ) in (1.13), (3.2)-(3.3).
  • standard math Schur test for integral operators on L2(Ω) bounds the operator norm by products of sup row and column sums.
    Used in Lemma 2.2 to show ∆A(ξ) is bounded for α<1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Operator estimates in homogenization of L\'evy-type operators with periodic coefficients." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/73BD6ERH

@misc{pith2026241220408,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Operator estimates in homogenization of L\'evy-type operators with periodic coefficients},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/73BD6ERH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20408}
}
abstract

The paper deals with homogenization of self-adjoint operators in $L_2(\mathbb R^d)$ of the form $$ ({\mathbb A}_\eps u) (\x) = \int_{\R^d} \mu(\x/\eps, \y/\eps) \frac{\left( u(\x) - u(\y) \right)}{|\x - \y|^{d+\alpha}}\,d\y, $$ where $0< \alpha < 2$, and $\eps>0$ is a small parameter. It is assumed that the function $\mu(\x,\y)$ is $\Z^d$-periodic in each variable, $\mu(\x,\y)=\mu(\y,\x)$ for all $\x$ and $\y$, and $0< \mu_- \leqslant \mu(\x,\y) \leqslant \mu_+< \infty$. Under these assumptions we show that the resolvent $({\mathbb A}_\eps + I)^{-1}$ converges, as $\eps\to0$, in the operator norm in $L_2(\R^d)$ to the resolvent $({\mathbb A}^0 + I)^{-1}$ of the limit operator ${\mathbb A}^0$ given by $$ ({\mathbb A}^0 u) (\x) = \int_{\R^d} \mu^0 \frac{\left( u(\x) - u(\y) \right)}{|\x - \y|^{d+\alpha}}\,d\y, $$ where $\mu^0$ is the mean value of $\mu(\x,\y)$. We also show that the operator norm of the discrepancy $\|({\mathbb A}_\eps + I)^{-1} - (\A^0 + I)^{-1}\|_{L_2(\mathbb R^d)\to L_2(\mathbb R^d)}$ can be estimated by $O(\eps^\alpha)$, if $0< \alpha < 1$, by $O(\eps (1 + | \operatorname{ln} \eps|)^2)$, if $ \alpha =1$, and by $O(\eps^{2- \alpha})$, if $1< \alpha < 2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Homogenization of non-symmetric convolution type operators

    math.FA 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For non-symmetric convolution-type operators with periodic coefficients, the resolvent is approximated in operator norm by a homogenized diffusion resolvent with drift, with error O(ε).

  2. Homogenization of L\'evy-type operators: operator estimates with correctors

    math.AP 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding N corrector terms gives an O(ε) operator-norm resolvent approximation for periodic Lévy-type operators whenever α lies in (2−1/N, 2−1/(N+1)].

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [14]

    and Zhizhina E., Homogenization of L ´evy-type operators with oscillating coefficients , SIAM J

    Kassmann M., Piatnitski A. and Zhizhina E., Homogenization of L ´evy-type operators with oscillating coefficients , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51 (2019), no. 5, 3641–3665

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    and Conca C., Bloch wave homogenization and spectral asymptotic analysi s, J

    Allaire G. and Conca C., Bloch wave homogenization and spectral asymptotic analysi s, J. Math. Pures Appl. 77 (1998), 153–208

    work page 1998

  3. [2]

    and Vanninathan M., The Bloch transform and applications , ESAIM: Proceedings 3 (1998), 65–84

    Allaire G., Conca C. and Vanninathan M., The Bloch transform and applications , ESAIM: Proceedings 3 (1998), 65–84

    work page 1998

  4. [3]

    and Kassmann M., Nonlocal Dirichlet forms and symmetric jump processes , Transactions of the AMS 361 (2009), no

    Barlow M., Bass R., Chen Z.-Q. and Kassmann M., Nonlocal Dirichlet forms and symmetric jump processes , Transactions of the AMS 361 (2009), no. 4, 1963–1999

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    and Panasenko G., Homogenization: averaging processes in periodic media , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1989

    Bakhvalov N. and Panasenko G., Homogenization: averaging processes in periodic media , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1989

    work page 1989

  6. [5]

    and Papanicolaou G., Asymptotic analysis for periodic structures , Stud

    Bensoussan A., Lions J.-L. and Papanicolaou G., Asymptotic analysis for periodic structures , Stud. Math. Appl., vol. 5, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam–New York, 1978

    work page 1978

  7. [6]

    Birman M. Sh. and Suslina T. A., Second order periodic differential operators. Threshold pro perties and homog- enization, St. Petersburg Math. J. 15 (2004), no. 5, 639–714

    work page 2004

  8. [7]

    Birman M. Sh. and Suslina T. A., Homogenization with corrector term for periodic elliptic d ifferential operators, St. Petersburg Math. J. 17 (2006), no. 6, 897–973

    work page 2006

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    Birman M. Sh. and Suslina T. A., Homogenization with corrector for periodic differential ope rators. Approxima- tion of solutions in the Sobolev class H 1(Rd), St. Petersburg Math. J. 18 (2007), no. 6, 857–955

    2007

  2. [9]

    and Piatnitski A., Homogenization of quadratic convolution energies in perio dically perforated do- mains, Adv

    Braides A. and Piatnitski A., Homogenization of quadratic convolution energies in perio dically perforated do- mains, Adv. Calc. Var. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1515/acv-20 19-0083

    2019 doi

  3. [10]

    and Vanninathan M., Bloch approximation in homogenization and applications , SIAM J

    Conca C., Orive R. and Vanninathan M., Bloch approximation in homogenization and applications , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 33 (2002), no. 5, 1166–1198

    2002

  4. [11]

    and Tankov P., Financial modelling with jump processes , Chapman and Hall/CRC Financial Mathe- matics Series, FL, 2004

    Cont R. and Tankov P., Financial modelling with jump processes , Chapman and Hall/CRC Financial Mathe- matics Series, FL, 2004

    2004

  5. [12]

    M., Phillips R

    Edwards A. M., Phillips R. A., Watkins N. W., Freeman M. P ., Murphy E. J., Afanasyev V., Buldyrev S. V., Da Luz M. G. E., Raposo E. P., Stanley H. E. and Viswanathan G. M ., Revisiting L ´evy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , Nature 449 (20...

    2007

  6. [13]

    and Sims D., Optimal foraging strategies : L´evy walks balance searching and patch exploitation under a very broad range of conditions , J

    Humphries N. and Sims D., Optimal foraging strategies : L´evy walks balance searching and patch exploitation under a very broad range of conditions , J. Theoret. Biol. 358 (2014), 179–193

    2014

  7. [15]

    and Zhizhina E ., On ground state of some non local Schr¨ odinger operators, Appl

    Kondratiev Yu., Molchanov S., Pirogov S. and Zhizhina E ., On ground state of some non local Schr¨ odinger operators, Appl. Anal. 96 (2017), no. 8, 1390–1400

    2017

  8. [16]

    Kwasnicki M., Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional Laplace operat or, Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis 20 (2017), 7–51

    2017

  9. [17]

    and Schoutens W., Backward stochastic differential equations and Feynman-Kac formula for L ´evy processes, with applications in finance , Bernoulli 7 (2001), 761–776

    Nualart D. and Schoutens W., Backward stochastic differential equations and Feynman-Kac formula for L ´evy processes, with applications in finance , Bernoulli 7 (2001), 761–776

    2001

  10. [18]

    and Zhizhina E., Periodic homogenization of nonlocal operators with a convo lution-type kernel , SIAM J

    Piatnitski A. and Zhizhina E., Periodic homogenization of nonlocal operators with a convo lution-type kernel , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 49 (2017), no. 1, 64–81

    2017

  11. [19]

    and Zhizhina E., Homogenization of biased convolution type operators , Asymptot

    Piatnitski A. and Zhizhina E., Homogenization of biased convolution type operators , Asymptot. Anal. 115 (2019), no. 3-4, 241–262

    2019

  12. [20]

    and Zhizhina E., On operator estimates in homogenization of nonlocal operators of convolution type , J

    Piatnitski A., Sloushch V., Suslina T. and Zhizhina E., On operator estimates in homogenization of nonlocal operators of convolution type , J. Diff. Equ. 352 (2023), 153–188

    2023

  13. [21]

    L., Sloushch V

    Piatnitski A. L., Sloushch V. A., Suslina T. A. and Zhizh ina E. A., On the homogenization of nonlocal convolution type operators, Russian J. Math. Phys. 31 (2024), no. 1, 137–145

    2024

  14. [22]

    i., L´evy processes and infinitely divisible distributions , Cambridge Stud

    Sato K. i., L´evy processes and infinitely divisible distributions , Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 68, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013

    2013

  15. [23]

    V., An asymptotic expansion of the solution of a second order ell iptic equation with periodic rapidly oscillating coefficients , Sb

    Sevostyanova E. V., An asymptotic expansion of the solution of a second order ell iptic equation with periodic rapidly oscillating coefficients , Sb. Math. 43 (1982), 181–198

    1982

  16. [24]

    M., Geometric and arithmetic methods in the spectral theory of m ultidimensional periodic operators, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics 171, AMS, Providence, 1987

    Skriganov M. M., Geometric and arithmetic methods in the spectral theory of m ultidimensional periodic operators, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics 171, AMS, Providence, 1987

    1987

  17. [25]

    A., Operator-theoretic approach to the homogenization of Schr ¨ odinger-type equations with periodic coefficients , Russian Math

    Suslina T. A., Operator-theoretic approach to the homogenization of Schr ¨ odinger-type equations with periodic coefficients , Russian Math. Surveys 78 (2023), no. 6, 1023–1154. 28

    2023

  18. [26]

    Uchaikin V. V. and Zolotarev V. M., Chance and stability. Stable distributions and their appli cations, in Modern Probability and Statistics, VSP, Utrecht, 1999

    1999

  19. [27]

    A., L´evy processes in the physical sciences , in L´evy Processes, Birkh¨ auser, Boston, MA, 2001, pp

    Woyczynski W. A., L´evy processes in the physical sciences , in L´evy Processes, Birkh¨ auser, Boston, MA, 2001, pp. 241-266

    2001

  20. [28]

    V., Spectral approach to asymptotic diffusion problems , Differential Equations 25 (1989), no

    Zhikov V. V., Spectral approach to asymptotic diffusion problems , Differential Equations 25 (1989), no. 1, 33–39

    1989

  21. [29]

    V., On operator estimates in homogenization theory , Dokl

    Zhikov V. V., On operator estimates in homogenization theory , Dokl. Math. 72 (2005), no. 1, 534–538

    2005

  22. [30]

    V., Kozlov S

    Zhikov V. V., Kozlov S. M. and Oleinik O. A., Homogenization of differential operators and integral funct ionals, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994

    1994

  23. [31]

    Zhikov V. V. and Pastukhova S. E., On operator estimates for some problems in homogenization t heory, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 12 (2005), no. 4, 515–524

    2005

  24. [32]

    Zhikov V. V. and Pastukhova S. E., Operator estimates in homogenization theory , Russian Math. Surveys 71 (2016), no. 3, 417–511

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.