Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Impact of Cognitive Load on Human Trust in Hybrid Human-Robot Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.20654 v1 pith:2ZJ6OJ6C submitted 2024-12-30 cs.RO cs.HC

classification cs.ROcs.HC
keywords cognitiveloadtrusthumanhuman-robotcollaborationhybridtask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human trust plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of human-robot collaboration. Despite its significance, the development and maintenance of an optimal trust level are obstructed by the complex nature of influencing factors and their mechanisms. This study investigates the effects of cognitive load on human trust within the context of a hybrid human-robot collaboration task. An experiment is conducted where the humans and the robot, acting as team members, collaboratively construct pyramids with differentiated levels of task complexity. Our findings reveal that cognitive load exerts diverse impacts on human trust in the robot. Notably, there is an increase in human trust under conditions of high cognitive load. Furthermore, the rewards for performance are substantially higher in tasks with high cognitive load compared to those with low cognitive load, and a significant correlation exists between human trust and the failure risk of performance in tasks with low and medium cognitive load. By integrating interdependent task steps, this research emphasizes the unique dynamics of hybrid human-robot collaboration scenarios. The insights gained not only contribute to understanding how cognitive load influences trust but also assist developers in optimizing collaborative target selection and designing more effective human-robot interfaces in such environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Resilient Human-AI Collaboration: A Lifecycle Taxonomy of Sociotechnical Risks and Cascading Failures

    cs.HC 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A literature synthesis maps human-AI collaboration failures into six interacting risk clusters arranged along a four-stage lifecycle.

Pith tools