Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 19 references

Oscillator Calculus on Coadjoint Orbits and Index Theorems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Finite supersymmetric spin chains are exact truncations of sigma models on SU(n) flag manifolds; diagonalizing them is the same problem as finding spectra of generalized Laplace operators on those spaces.

desk verdict The CP1 truncation is proven and elegant, but the abstract overclaims for all SU(n) orbits: Section 9's partial-flag supercharges are asserted without a nilpotency proof, making the general truncation claim a conjecture in its current form. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.21024 v1 pith:E5X5O42T submitted 2024-12-30 hep-th math-phmath.DGmath.MPmath.RT

Dmitri Bykov , Viacheslav Krivorol , Andrew Kuzovchikov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.DGmath.MPmath.RT
keywords supersymmetricquantummechanicsspinchainscoadjointorbitsflagmanifoldsWittenindexDolbeaultoperatoroscillatorcalculustheorems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a class of finite-dimensional supersymmetric quantum-mechanical systems, described as spin chains built from bosonic and fermionic oscillators, are not toy models but exact truncations of one-dimensional sigma models whose target spaces are the flag manifolds of SU(n) (the coadjoint orbits of SU(n)). Concretely, diagonalizing the spin-chain Hamiltonians is equivalent to finding exact spectra of generalized Laplace operators — the Dolbeault operator in the N=2 'D-model' and the Kähler–de Rham operator in the N=4 'K-model' — on those spaces, with the truncation parameter p controlling how many harmonics are kept. As a first application, the authors compute the Witten index (a signed count of zero-energy states) and find that it is independent of p: for the D-model it equals the equivariant Dolbeault index, given by the Weyl character formula for SU(n), and for the K-model it equals the Euler characteristic of the flag manifold. A sympathetic reader would care because the result turns spectral geometry and index theory on a large family of homogeneous spaces into finite linear algebra, and it points to a spin-chain route to index theorems.

What carries the argument

The machinery is an oscillator calculus on coadjoint orbits. The central objects are supercharges of the form $Q = \sum_{A<B} \alpha_{AB} \psi_{AB} (z_A^\dagger \cdot z_B) - \sum_{A<B<C} (\alpha_{AB} \alpha_{BC}/\alpha_{AC}) \, \psi_{AB} \psi_{BC} \psi_{AC}^\dagger$, built from bosonic creation/annihilation operators $z_A$ in the defining representation of SU(n) and fermionic operators $\psi_{AB}$ that connect sites; the Hilbert space is the subspace of the oscillator Fock space annihilated by diagonal constraints $C_A=0$ that encode the quiver charges. Nilpotency of Q (for N=4, the two supercharges $Q_1,Q_2$ with the Kähler condition $1/\alpha_{AC}^2 = 1/\alpha_{AB}^2 + 1/\alpha_{BC}^2$) is what makes the system supersymmetric, and it is the same algebraic structure that enforces the Kähler property of the target metric. The Witten index is computed by writing the supercharacter of the free Fock space and averaging over the gauge group, which reduces to a residue integral; the only non-zero residues are the permutations of the diagonal parameters, producing the Weyl character formula (D-model) or the constant $n!/\prod n_A!$ (K-model).

What would settle it

Take the partial-flag D-model with $n=4$, $k=3$ and block sizes $(n_1,n_2,n_3)=(2,1,1)$, and compute $Q^2$ explicitly using the supercharge (9.3); if $Q^2\neq 0$ or the equivariant Witten index differs from the Weyl character (9.9), the claimed truncation for partial flags fails. Alternatively, diagonalize the D-model Hamiltonian for the complete flag $F_4$ at $p=2$ and check that its spectrum is contained in the $p=3$ spectrum; a counterexample would falsify the nested-spectrum property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a correspondence between finite supersymmetric quantum-mechanical systems and the geometry of SU(n) coadjoint orbits. On the spin-chain side one takes bosonic oscillators $z_A^\alpha$ with $\alpha=1,\ldots,n$, together with fermionic operators $\psi_{AB}$ connecting sites, imposes diagonal constraints $C_A=0$ that make the Hilbert space finite-dimensional, and defines the Hamiltonian as the anticommutator of a nilpotent supercharge with its adjoint. On the geometric side the same system, in the large-p limit, is a supersymmetric $\sigma$ model on the flag manifold, and for any finite p the spin-chain Hamiltonian reproduces the spectrum of the Laplace operator truncated to the first p harmonics; the spectra are nested, $\operatorname{Spec} H_p \subset \operatorname{Spec} H_{p+1}$. The paper proves this identification in detail for $\mathbb{CP}^1$ and constructs the analogous oscillator systems for complete flags, projective spaces, and partial flags, computing their equivariant Witten indices. The index of the D-model is the character of the SU(n) representation with Young diagram $(p_n,\ldots,p_1)$ — the Weyl formula — and the index of the K-model is the Euler characteristic $n!/\prod n_A!$; both are independent of the truncation level p.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $\mathbb{CP}^1$ derivation, in which the spin chain is shown to reproduce the $\sigma$ model as $p\to\infty$, extends unchanged to all flag manifolds of SU(n); the paper states in Section 7 that it will leave the detailed $\sigma$-model derivation for the general case aside, and Section 9 assumes the nilpotency of the partial-flag supercharges rather than proving it from the algebra.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For each truncation level p, the spin-chain spectrum is an exact subset of the flag-manifold Laplacian spectrum, and since $\operatorname{Spec} H_p \subset \operatorname{Spec} H_{p+1}$, the full spectrum is recovered in the $p\to\infty$ limit.
  • The D-model Witten index is independent of p and equals the equivariant Dolbeault index, given by the SU(n) character with Young diagram $(p_n,\ldots,p_1)$; for ample line bundles this is precisely the character of the holomorphic sections of the twisting line bundle.
  • The K-model Witten index is the Euler characteristic of the flag manifold, $n!/\prod n_A!$, also independent of p, so the finite models reproduce the de Rham index.
  • Because the twisted Dolbeault complex on a Kähler manifold is isomorphic to the Dirac complex, the same spin-chain models compute the index of the twisted Dirac operator; the transition from Dolbeault to Dirac is implemented by switching from normal to Weyl ordering, shifting the magnetic charges by $(n_A+n_{A-1})/2$.
  • The 'free' form of the superspace actions, with interactions encoded in nonlinear chirality constraints, suggests that the entire family of spin-chain models can be quantized uniformly, with the target-space metric and its Kähler condition emerging from the supersymmetry algebra itself.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the truncation mechanism extends to all flag manifolds as the paper assumes, the same oscillator calculus should yield finite-dimensional models for Grassmannians and partial flags with unequal block sizes, and the authors' conjecture about other classical compact groups could be tested by constructing the analogous quivers.
  • The p-independence of the index hints at a rigidity that may survive outside the supersymmetric sector: one could try to compute the supercharacter from the free Fock space alone and interpret the residue formula as a localization statement for quiver varieties, connecting these spin chains to established gauge-theory localization results.
  • A concrete testable extension is to search for Yangian or quantum-group symmetries of these spin-chain Hamiltonians; if present, they would make the spectrum of the flag-manifold Laplacian explicitly solvable at every truncation level rather than just for small p.
  • The Weyl-ordering shift associated with the Dirac operator suggests that changing the quantization prescription in the spin chain may generate new topological data, such as spin-c index formulas for flag manifolds that are not spin.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper introduces finite-dimensional N=2 and N=4 supersymmetric oscillator models (the 'D-model' and 'K-model') whose Hilbert spaces are constrained Fock spaces organized by quivers. It claims that these models are natural truncations of 1D sigma models on SU(n) coadjoint orbits (flag manifolds), computes their equivariant Witten indices as supercharacters and contour integrals, and matches the results with Dolbeault characters, Euler characteristics, and Weyl character formulas. A detailed CP1 analysis includes explicit spectra and a path-integral derivation of the N=2b and N=4a sigma-model limits; later sections extend the oscillator construction to complete flags, projective spaces, and partial flags, and relate normal-ordered constraints to the Dirac operator twist.

Significance. If fully established, the paper would give a new finite-dimensional route to spectra of Laplace operators on flag manifolds and a novel derivation of index theorems for coadjoint orbits. The CP1 sections are careful: the spectrum k(k+1+q) matches truncated monopole harmonics, the index computations (1.18)-(1.20) and (2.12) are explicit, and the path-integral reduction in Section 6 recovers known sigma-model actions. The residue method in Sections 7-9 is transparent and the match with the Weyl character formula in Appendix D is convincing. However, the generalization beyond CP1 rests on unproved algebraic identities and an extrapolated sigma-model limit; these gaps block the central claim as it stands.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 9.1, Eqs. (9.3), (9.4), (9.9)] For partial flag manifolds the paper never proves the nilpotency Q^2=0 that defines the D-model as a supersymmetric system. The proof for complete flags in Section 7.1.2 uses scalar fermions ψ_AB and a diagrammatic cancellation; here ψ_AB are n_A×n_B matrices, so the cubic term Tr(ψ†_AC ψ_BC ψ_AB) produces internal-index sums that must be checked. Formula (9.9) is a valid superdimension of the constrained Fock space, but it is the Witten index of the Dolbeault complex only if Q^2=0 and the constraints are Q-invariant; without that proof the identification with the Dolbeault index of the partial flag manifold is not established. Since partial flags include Grassmannians and all non-CP^n orbits, this gap is load-bearing.
  2. [Section 9.2, Eq. (9.14)] As written, the two cubic trace terms in the K-model supercharge are identical—both are Tr(Ψ†_AC Ψ_BC Ψ_AB)—with different coefficients, so the formula cannot be the matrix generalization of the complete-flag supercharge (7.43), where the two cubic terms involve different fermion orderings (Ψ_AB(Ψ†_AC Ψ_BC) versus Ψ_BC(Ψ†_AC Ψ_AB)). For scalar complete flags the ordering is immaterial, but for n_A>1 it is not. In addition, the stated conditions for the N=4 algebra (all p_A equal and the Kähler condition (7.44)) are asserted without proof in the matrix case. Consequently the identification of (9.16) with the Euler characteristic of the partial flag manifold as a Witten index is not supported.
  3. [Chapter 3, opening before Eq. (7.2), and Sections 8-9] The paper's abstract claims that the spin chains are natural truncations of 1D sigma models with SU(n) coadjoint orbit targets, but the only derivation of this limit is for CP1 in Section 6. For complete flags the text explicitly defers the derivation ('could in principle be recovered along the lines of our analysis of the CP1 model in Section 6'), and no analogous derivation is supplied for CP^{n-1} or partial flags. The finite-dimensional index computations do not by themselves prove the truncation statement; the latter is needed to justify interpreting the spin-chain spectra and indices as those of the sigma models on the corresponding orbits. This should either be proved or explicitly presented as a conjecture.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1.0.2] The word 'indepent' should be 'independent'.
  2. [Equations (9.6)-(9.8)] The variables s_{A,a} are introduced through the contour integrals but never explicitly defined as eigenvalues of the Cartan elements of the gauge group; please define them in the text preceding (9.6).
  3. [Quiver diagrams in Sections 3, 7, 8, 9] The quiver diagrams (3.1), (7.13), (7.30), (8.14), (9.1), and (9.11) are inline images rather than numbered figures; numbering them would make the cross-references in the text easier to follow.
  4. [Sections 4-5] The identification of the FI parameters with -p_A is stated after the component reduction; a short table summarizing the identifications among ξ, κ, p_A, and α_AB would improve readability.
  5. [Section 10.3, Eq. (10.19)] The claim that Weyl ordering produces exactly the shift (10.17) is made in one sentence; a short calculation showing the shift for the constraints (9.4) would make the Dirac-operator identification easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the index computations are self-contained and verified against external character and Euler-characteristic results.

full rationale

The paper's central index computations are self-contained. The equivariant Witten indices are evaluated as supercharacters of constrained Fock spaces, e.g., Eqs. (7.15)-(7.18), (9.6)-(9.9), and (9.16), and the resulting expressions are then compared with the external Weyl character formula (Appendix D) and the known Euler characteristic of flag manifolds. No parameter is fitted to reproduce the indices: the indices are independent of the truncation level p and of the couplings alpha_AB, and the supercharge coefficients (beta, gamma_i, delta_i) are fixed by solving the SUSY algebra rather than by matching index values. The main caveat is the unproven generalization of the sigma-model truncation: Section 7 explicitly leaves that derivation aside ('we will exclusively concentrate on the spin chain part of the story, leaving apart the detailed derivation of the sigma model, which could in principle be recovered along the lines of our analysis of the CP1 model in Section 6'), and Section 9 asserts nilpotency and the N=4 algebra for partial flags without proof. These are omitted proofs or gaps in the claimed 'natural truncation' statement, but they are not circular reductions: the index calculations stand on their own and match known external benchmarks. The self-citation to [BK24] for the bosonic flag-manifold limit is a prior, independently published derivation and is not used as the sole justification of the index identities.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central constructions rest on standard oscillator algebra and classical index theorems, plus two physics assumptions: the validity of the large-p path integral limit and the (unproven) extension of the truncation property to all flag manifolds. The main model parameters (couplings alpha_AB and truncation levels p_A) are arbitrary and do not affect the index, so no fitting is involved. The invented entities are mathematical constructs with no independent empirical evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha_AB (coupling constants)
    Arbitrary coupling constants in the supercharges (1.2), (7.7), (9.3). They are not fitted to data; they parameterize the metric on the orbit. In K-models the SUSY algebra imposes the Kähler relation (7.38) among them, reducing the count. The Witten index is independent of their values.
  • p_A (truncation levels) and q (monopole charge)
    Integer parameters defining the constraints (1.5)-(1.6), (7.9)-(7.11), (9.4). They set the size of the finite Hilbert space. The Witten index is independent of p, and only differences q_A = p_A - p_{A-1} enter.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Canonical (anti)commutation relations for bosonic and fermionic oscillators define the Fock space.
    Used throughout, e.g., Eq. (1.1).
  • standard math The polar decomposition Z = UH of a non-degenerate 2x2 matrix superfield is unique and the non-degenerate matrices are dense in the integration domain.
    Invoked in Section 6.1 before Eq. (6.4).
  • domain assumption Path integral manipulations remain valid when taking the large-p limit, with K_12, K_21 becoming Lagrange multipliers.
    Section 6.1, after Eq. (6.6). This is a formal physics argument, not a rigorous derivation.
  • standard math Borel-Weil-Bott theorem and Weyl character formula give the index of twisted Dolbeault operator on flag manifolds.
    Cited in Introduction (0.3) and used in Appendix D to identify computed characters.
  • ad hoc to paper For partial flags, the supercharge (9.3) is nilpotent and the K-model algebra (9.14) closes.
    Section 9 states these without proof; no calculation is provided for the general partial flag case.
  • domain assumption Complex structures on flag manifolds are in one-to-one correspondence with total orderings of the flag labels.
    Section 7, citing [BH58], [AP86], [ABW22].
invented entities (2)
  • Nonlinear chiral multiplet (generalized chirality condition w.r.t. a superconnection A)
    purpose: Describe the spin chain truncations in N=2 superspace with a free-looking Lagrangian and interactions encoded in deformed chirality constraints.
    Introduced in this paper (Sections 4-5); no external falsifiable prediction.
  • Superconnection A (upper-triangular for D-model, general for K-model)
    purpose: Encodes interactions through modified chirality conditions D_c Z = A Z.
    Defined in Eqs. (4.3) and (5.2); a mathematical construct without independent experimental handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Oscillator Calculus on Coadjoint Orbits and Index Theorems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5X5O42T

@misc{pith2026241221024,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Oscillator Calculus on Coadjoint Orbits and Index Theorems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5X5O42T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.21024}
}
abstract

We consider quantum mechanical systems of spin chain type, with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces and $\mathcal{N}=2$ or $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetry, described in $\mathcal{N}=2$ superspace in terms of nonlinear chiral multiplets. We prove that they are natural truncations of 1D sigma models, whose target spaces are $\mathsf{SU}(n)$ (co)adjoint orbits. As a first application, we compute the Witten indices of these finite-dimensional models showing that they reproduce the Dolbeault and de Rham indices of the target space. The problem of finding the exact spectra of generalized Laplace operators on such orbits is shown to be equivalent to the diagonalization of spin chain Hamiltonians.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    String junctions in flag manifold sigma model

    [ABW22] I. Affleck, D. Bykov and K. Wamer. “Flag manifold sigma models”. Physics Reports 953 (2022), pp. 1–93. [AG83] L. Alvarez-Gaume. “Supersymmetry and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem”. Commun. Math. Phys. 90 (1983), pp. 161–173. [Alv91] O. Alvarez. “Lectures on quantum mechanics and the index theorem”. Graduate Summer School on the Geometry and Topolo...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  2. [4]

    Characteristic Classes and Homogeneous Spaces, I

    [BH58] A. Borel and F. Hirzebruch. “Characteristic Classes and Homogeneous Spaces, I”. American Journal of Mathematics 80.2 (1958), pp. 458–538. [BJ01] A. V. Bolsinov and B. Jovanovi´ c. “Integrable geodesic flows on homogeneous spaces”. Mat. Sb. 192 (2001), pp. 21–40. [BK24] D. Bykov and A. Kuzovchikov. “The classical and quantum particle on a flag manif...

    work page 1958

  3. [6]

    The Quantum Mechanical Supersymmetric O(3) and O(2,1) Models

    multiplets”. Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012), pp. 815–853. 67 [DMH83] A. C. Davis, A. J. Macfarlane and J. W. van Holten. “The Quantum Mechanical Supersymmetric O(3) and O(2,1) Models”. Nucl. Phys. B 216 (1983). [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 223, 544 (1983)], p

    work page 2012

  4. [11]

    North-Holland, 2000, pp. 709–746. [Gur92] D. Gurarie. Symmetries and Laplacians: Introduction to Harmonic Analysis, Group Representations and Applications . North-Holland Mathematics Studies. North Holland,

    work page 2000

  5. [17]

    Chiral Models: Geometrical Aspects

    [Per87] A. M. Perelomov. “Chiral Models: Geometrical Aspects”. Phys. Rept. 146 (1987), pp. 135–213. [Pes17] V. Pestun. “Review of localization in geometry”. J. Phys. A 50.44 (2017), p. 443002. arXiv: 1608.02954 [hep-th]. [PS94] G. Paternain and R. Spatzier. “New Examples of Manifolds with Completely Integrable Geodesic Flows”. Advances in Mathematics 108....

    arXiv 1987

  6. [29]

    GLSM’s for partial flag manifolds

    [DS08] R. Donagi and E. Sharpe. “GLSM’s for partial flag manifolds”. J. Geom. Phys. 58 (2008), pp. 1662–1692. [FGZ86] I. B. Frenkel, H. Garland and G. J. Zuckerman. “Semiinfinite Cohomology and String Theory”. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 83 (1986), p

    work page 2008

  7. [195]

    The Dirac Equation in Exterior Form

    [BT85] I. M. Benn and R. W. Tucker. “The Dirac Equation in Exterior Form”. Commun. Math. Phys. 98 (1985), pp. 53–63. [BV85] N. Berline and M. Vergne. “The Equivariant Index and Kirillov’s Character For- mula”. American Journal of Mathematics 107.5 (1985), pp. 1159–1190. [Byk12] D. Bykov. “Haldane limits via Lagrangian embeddings”. Nuclear Physics B 855 (2...

    work page 1985

  8. [493]

    A Universal Dirac operator and noncommutative spin bundles over fuzzy complex projective spaces

    [Dol`08] B. P. Dolan, I. Huet, S. Murray and D. O’Connor. “A Universal Dirac operator and noncommutative spin bundles over fuzzy complex projective spaces”. JHEP 03 (2008), p

    work page 2008

Show all 19 references
  1. [1506]

    Extensions of Supersymmetric Spin Systems

    [Nic77] H. Nicolai. “Extensions of Supersymmetric Spin Systems”. J. Phys. A 10 (1977), pp. 2143–2151. [OS93] Y. N. Obukhov and S. N. Solodukhin. “Reduction of the Dirac equation and rela- tion with the Ivanenko-Landau-Kahler equation”. Theor. Math. Phys. 94 (1993), pp. 198–210...

    1977

  2. [1966]

    Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking

    [Wit82a] E. Witten. “Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking”. Nucl. Phys. B 202 (1982), pp. 253–316. [Wit82b] E. Witten. “Supersymmetry and Morse theory”. J. Diff. Geom. 17.4 (1982), pp. 661–692. [WY76] T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang. “Dirac Monopole Without Strings: Monopole Har- mon...

    1982

  3. [1970]

    Ricci-Flat Metrics on Vector Bundles Over Flag Manifolds

    [AZB19] I. Achmed-Zade and D. Bykov. “Ricci-Flat Metrics on Vector Bundles Over Flag Manifolds”. Commun. Math. Phys. 376 (2019), pp. 2309–2328. [BBT03] O. Babelon, D. Bernard and M. Talon. Introduction to Classical Integrable Sys- tems. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Phy...

    2019

  4. [1973]

    Supersymmetry and K¨ ahler manifolds

    [Zum79] B. Zumino. “Supersymmetry and K¨ ahler manifolds”. Physics Letters B 87.3 (1979), pp. 203–206. 70

    1979

  5. [1989]

    The Harish-Chandra integral: An introduction with examples

    [McS21] C. McSwiggen. “The Harish-Chandra integral: An introduction with examples”. Enseign. Math. 67.3/4 (2021), pp. 229–299. [Mic80] M. L. Michelsohn. “Clifford and Spinor Cohomology of Kahler Manifolds”. Amer- ican Journal of Mathematics 102 (1980), pp. 1083–1146. [MM03] G....

    2021

  6. [1991]

    Generic HKT geometries in the harmonic superspace approach

    [FIS18] S. Fedoruk, E. Ivanov and A. Smilga. “Generic HKT geometries in the harmonic superspace approach”. J. Math. Phys. 59.8 (2018), p. 083501. [Fre87] D. Freed. “Geometry of Dirac Operators”. Preprint (1987). [Fri00] T. Friedrich. Dirac Operators in Riemannian Geometry . Gr...

    2018

  7. [1992]

    Harmonic Spinors

    [Hit74] N. Hitchin. “Harmonic Spinors”. Adv. Math. 14.1 (1974), pp. 1–55. [HS90] C. M. Hull and B. J. Spence. “ N“ 2 Current Algebra and Coset Models”. Phys. Lett. B 241 (1990), pp. 357–364. [HT90] P. S. Howe and P. K. Townsend. “Chern-Simons Quantum Mechanics”. Class. Quant. ...

    1974 arXiv

  8. [2000]

    Lattice models with N=2 supersym- metry

    [FSB03] P. Fendley, K. Schoutens and J. de Boer. “Lattice models with N=2 supersym- metry”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003), p. 120402. [FSN03] P. Fendley, K. Schoutens and B. Nienhuis. “Lattice fermion models with super- symmetry”. J. Phys. A 36 (2003), pp. 12399–12424. arXiv: con...

    2003 arXiv

  9. [2003]

    Homogeneous Kahler Manifolds: Paving the Way Towards New Supersymmetric σ Models

    [BFR86] M. Bordemann, M. Forger and H. R¨ omer. “Homogeneous Kahler Manifolds: Paving the Way Towards New Supersymmetric σ Models”. Commun. Math. Phys. 102 (1986), pp. 605–647. [BGV03] N. Berline, E. Getzler and M. Vergne. Heat Kernels and Dirac Operators . Grundlehren Text Ed...

    1986

  10. [2015]

    Supersymmetry Breaking and Nambu-Goldstone Fermions in Interacting Majorana Chains

    [SK19] N. Sannomiya and H. Katsura. “Supersymmetry Breaking and Nambu-Goldstone Fermions in Interacting Majorana Chains”. Phys. Rev. D 99.4 (2019), p. 045002. [Smi20] A Smilga. Differential Geometry through Supersymmetric Glasses . World Scien- tific,

    2019

  11. [2024]

    How To Quantize Supersymmetric Theories

    [Smi87] A. V. Smilga. “How To Quantize Supersymmetric Theories”. Nucl. Phys. B 292 (1987), pp. 363–380. 69 [SS93] S. Seifarth and U. Semmelmann. “The Spectrum of the Dirac operator on the odd dimensional complex projective space CPp2m´ 1q”. SFB 288 Preprint No. 95, Berlin (199...

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.