Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Circumstellar emission of Cepheids across the instability strip: Mid-infrared observations with VLTI/MATISSE

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mid-infrared interferometry of eight Cepheids finds no detectable circumstellar dust, ruling out large and bright envelopes that could bias the period-luminosity relation.

desk verdict Useful non-detections undercut by a load-bearing diameter mismatch; worth refereeing, but the authors need to fix the agreement claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00373 v1 pith:WZ6KODDV submitted 2024-12-31 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

V. Hocdé , A. Matter , N. Nardetto , A. Gallenne , P. Kervella , A. Mérand , G. Pietrzyński , W. Gieren
show 9 more authors
J. Leftley S. Robbe-Dubois B. Lopez M. C. Bailleul G. Bras R. Smolec P. Wielgórski G. Hajdu A. Afanasiev
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords Cepheidscircumstellarenvelopesmid-infraredinterferometryVLTI/MATISSEperiod-luminosityrelationdustinstabilitystripparallax-of-pulsation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Circumstellar dust emission is negligible or absent around Cepheids, according to mid-infrared interferometric observations of eight Galactic Cepheids spanning pulsation periods from 7 to 39 days. The paper uses VLTI/MATISSE to show that the spectral energy distributions show no dust features, closure phases are centro-symmetric, and visibilities match the predicted photospheric angular diameters. From these data the authors derive 2-$\sigma$ upper limits that exclude envelopes that are simultaneously large (about $10\,R_\star$) and bright (about 10% of the total flux), and the N-band visibilities rule out dust optical depths greater than about $0.001$ for iron, silicate, or alumina grains. The result matters because a bright circumstellar envelope would bias the period-luminosity relation and, in turn, cosmological distance measurements.

What carries the argument

The central object is the circumstellar envelope (CSE) of a Cepheid, characterized by its radius $R_\mathrm{CSE}$ and its fractional flux contribution $f_\mathrm{CSE}$. The argument is carried by comparing MATISSE interferometric observables (flux, closure phase, visibility) against the predictions of SPIPS, a parallax-of-pulsation code that interpolates the Cepheid photosphere along the pulsation cycle and supplies the expected photospheric angular diameter at the epoch of observation; additional constraints come from radiative-transfer models of dusty envelopes computed with DUSTY. The Gaussian CSE model, combined with a uniform-disk stellar model, provides the exclusion limits in the ($R_\mathrm{CSE}$, $f_\mathrm{CSE}$) plane.

What would settle it

Re-analyze the $L$- and $M$-band visibilities of $\eta$ Aql and $\zeta$ Gem using the directly fitted uniform-disk diameters ($2.182$ and $1.867$ mas, respectively) instead of the SPIPS diameters ($1.78$ and $1.59$ mas) as the photospheric reference; if the residuals then reveal an extended component consistent with a resolved envelope, the claim of absent CSEs would be falsified for those stars. Alternatively, an observation that resolves the first visibility minimum of a Cepheid with a longer-baseline array and finds the null shifted or deepened relative to the single-star model would directly contradict the paper's conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that mid-infrared observations of eight Cepheids with VLTI/MATISSE provide no evidence for circumstellar dust around any of them. The calibrated fluxes in the $L$, $M$, and $N$ bands follow a Rayleigh-Jeans slope without the silicate or other dust features that would appear between 9 and 12 microns; the closure phases are zero at the sub-degree level in all bands, indicating a centro-symmetric source; and the squared visibilities in the $L$ and $M$ bands are consistent with the angular diameters predicted by SPIPS fits to the photosphere. For the $N$ band, the visibilities are flat and rule out dusty models with optical depth as low as $0.001$ for iron, silicates, and alumina. The authors provide 2-$\sigma$ exclusion limits on a Gaussian CSE model: envelopes with radius about $10\,R_\star$ and 10% flux contribution are excluded for all stars, although compact CSEs with small flux contributions remain possible within the uncertainties.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions assume that the MATISSE visibility and flux calibration is unbiased at the few-percent level and that the SPIPS-predicted photospheric angular diameter is the correct zero-envelope reference; the paper's own fitted diameters are larger than the SPIPS values for at least two stars, so if the true photosphere is bigger, the derived upper limits would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Circumstellar dust does not contribute measurable bias to mid-infrared Cepheid photometry, so period-luminosity relations built from such photometry are not contaminated by dust emission for Cepheids in this period range.
  • The previously reported resolved dusty envelopes around T Mon and X Sgr, based on MIDI/VLTI data, are not confirmed by MATISSE, suggesting those earlier detections may have been affected by background or calibration issues.
  • The infrared excesses seen in the K and L bands from photometry must be produced by something other than dust, most plausibly free-free emission from a hot, ionized gas envelope.
  • Dust-grain radiative transfer models with optical depth $0.01$ or higher are ruled out, meaning any dust around these Cepheids is optically very thin.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If dust is truly absent, the near-infrared excess of Cepheids likely traces chromospheric or shocked-gas emission; this links the CSE question to mass-loss and pulsation-shock physics, and predicts that higher-spatial-frequency observations in the near-infrared should resolve a compact, centro-symmetric gas structure rather than a dusty shell.
  • The exclusion limits have an unavoidable blind spot: compact envelopes of a few stellar radii with less than about 5% flux cannot be distinguished from the photosphere with the current baselines, so the paper is compatible with, but does not disprove, the presence of such envelopes.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same MATISSE analysis to Cepheids with longer periods (>40 days) or to those showing strong period changes; the claim of absent dust is made across the instability strip, but the sample does not include the most extreme long-period objects, where dust condensation might be more likely.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports VLTI/MATISSE observations of eight Galactic Cepheids (periods 7.0–38.9 d, spanning the instability strip) in the L, M, and N bands, aimed at constraining the geometry and physical nature of their circumstellar envelopes (CSEs). The authors calibrate the mid-IR fluxes with template SEDs, use the SPIPS parallax-of-pulsation model (built from external photometry, radial velocities, effective temperatures, and near-IR interferometry) to predict each star's angular diameter and IR excess at the epoch of the MATISSE observations, and then examine SEDs, closure phases, and visibilities. They report: (1) the absence of dust spectral signatures in all eight SEDs; (2) closure phases consistent with centro-symmetric brightness distributions; (3) L/M/N visibilities that are interpreted as agreeing with the SPIPS angular diameters, with 2σ upper limits on CSE flux contributions (Table 5) that exclude envelopes that are simultaneously large and bright; and (4) DUSTY radiative-transfer test cases for η Aql and T Mon that rule out N-band dust emission with τV ≳ 0.001 for iron, silicate, and alumina grains. The paper concludes that circumstellar dust emission is negligible or absent for a wide range of Cepheid parameters.

Significance. The central claim, if correct, matters for the calibration of the period-luminosity relation and for parallax-of-pulsation distances, since an unmodeled CSE would bias both. The paper's strengths are: a homogeneous sample across the instability strip; use of external (non-MATISSE) data for the SPIPS photospheric reference, so the primary comparison is not circular; direct SED evidence against silicate features, which contradicts earlier MIDI-based detections for X Sgr and T Mon (Gallenne et al. 2013) and agrees with photometric studies (Groenewegen 2020); public data availability (ESO archive and Zenodo); and explicit upper-limit tables that later work can use. The SED and closure-phase results are direct and convincing as far as they go. However, the visibility-based pillar of the paper is currently compromised by an internal inconsistency in the diameter reference (Major comment 1), and the abstract overstates what Table 5 and the two-star DUSTY tests actually support. With those points fixed, the paper would be a solid contribution to the Cepheid CSE debate.

major comments (1)
  1. [§6.2, Tables 3–4, Fig. 4; §6.4, Eq. (6); §6.5] this is what it is
minor comments (6)
  1. [§6.3] The sentence ending 'disagrees with the results found by Gallenne et al. (2013) with MIDI/VLTI (see Fig. A.1e.' is missing its closing parenthesis and is grammatically incomplete.
  2. [Table B.1] The table formatting appears corrupted for some entries, e.g., '60687' and '1.3470.004' instead of '6068±7' and '1.347±0.004'; please regenerate the table with proper uncertainty formatting.
  3. [Table 4] The table note contains the typo 'boostrap'; it should read 'bootstrap'.
  4. [§5 and Fig. C.1] The statement that closure phases are 'down to a sub-degree level' is ambiguous given that the individual closure-phase points in Fig. C.1 scatter over several degrees; please specify whether this refers to the uncertainty of the mean and state the achieved precision explicitly.
  5. [Table 5 and Fig. 7] Please clarify whether the quoted CSE 'radius' is the FWHM of the Gaussian envelope or its half-width, since Table 5 mentions '(FWHM)' while Fig. 7 labels the axis 'RCSE(R⋆)' and the two conventions differ by a factor of two in the visibility argument.
  6. [§7] The conclusion that the visibilities constrain all eight stars should be qualified: N-band visibility constraints exist for only six stars (X Sgr and U Aql are excluded), and for X Sgr the N-band evidence is photometric only.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the comparison target (SPIPS photosphere) is built from external photometry, radial velocities, and near-infrared interferometry, not from the MATISSE data being tested.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that circumstellar dust emission is negligible or absent near Cepheids rests on three independent MATISSE observables: SED slopes (absence of silicate/oxide features), near-zero closure phases, and visibility levels compared with a SPIPS-predicted photospheric angular diameter. The SPIPS predictions are not fitted to the MATISSE data: they use external photometry, radial velocities, effective temperatures, and PIONIER/VINCI/PTI/FLUOR angular-diameter measurements (Table B.2), and the model is cross-checked against Trahin et al. (2021) and Gallenne et al. (2021). The logistic IR-excess parameterization (Eq. 1) is openly an ansatz from Hocdé et al. (2024b); it is used only to produce the 'star+CSE' comparison curves and is not the basis for the dust exclusion, which comes from N-band visibility and SED data. The 2σ CSE flux upper limits in §6.4 are derived by fixing θUD to the externally predicted SPIPS value and fitting a Gaussian CSE to the MATISSE residuals; this is a conditional exclusion, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The paper explicitly acknowledges limitations: single-snapshot observations exposed to calibration bias and the inability to constrain faint (~5%) compact CSEs (§7). A correctness concern that is not circularity: Table 4 PMOIRED θUD fits for η Aql (2.182±0.052 mas) and ζ Gem (1.867±0.042 mas) disagree with the SPIPS θUD values (1.78±0.04 and 1.59±0.03 mas) at roughly 7–8σ, while §6.2 claims agreement; this threatens the zero-CSE reference for those stars but does not make the derivation circular, because the SPIPS reference is independently constructed. No equation in the paper reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input, and no load-bearing result is imported solely through self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, forces, or particles. The central result rests on the fidelity of the SPIPS photosphere model, calibration templates, and several explicitly stated modeling choices for the envelope and dust. These are standard or clearly flagged assumptions rather than invented entities.

free parameters (5)
  • SPIPS IR excess logistic amplitude alpha (per star) = X Sgr 0.117, U Aql 0.072, eta Aql 0.181, beta Dor 0.190, zeta Gem 0.340, TT Aql 0.000, T Mon 0.188, U Car 0.220
    Fitted to photometric data in SPIPS to model the CSE IR excess; used to generate the star-plus-CSE visibility curves and to infer relevant excess magnitudes in K, L, and N bands.
  • SPIPS IR excess logistic slope beta (per star) = X Sgr 3.391, U Aql 0.730, eta Aql 1.021, beta Dor 0.967, zeta Gem 0.339, TT Aql 0.000, T Mon 2.247, U Car 4.288
    Fitted together with alpha in SPIPS; controls the wavelength dependence of the excess and hence the predicted mid-IR excess level.
  • CSE spherical shell radius in SPIPS model = 2.5 R_star (fixed)
    Chosen by hand, following near-IR resolved CSE sizes; used to compute the effect of the CSE on the predicted angular diameter and visibility.
  • DUSTY condensation temperature = 1200 K (fixed)
    Arbitrarily fixed in the radiative transfer test cases, slightly higher than standard condensation models; affects the dust model visibility and IR excess predictions.
  • DUSTY optical depth tau_V per dust type = Scanned: iron 0.01, 0.005, 0.001; silicate 0.002, 0.001, 0.0005; alumina 0.001, 0.0005, 0.0002
    Representative test values chosen to illustrate observable signatures; the paper uses the comparison to conclude tau_V of order 0.001 or lower is consistent with MATISSE data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Quasi-static photosphere assumption with ATLAS9 solar-metallicity atmosphere models and standard microturbulent velocity (2 km/s) represents the Cepheid photosphere accurately.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 for SPIPS modeling of the stellar flux and angular diameter at the epoch of MATISSE observations.
  • domain assumption Projection factor p = 1.27 for most stars, or Gaia DR3 parallax for TT Aql and U Car, correctly handles the distance versus p-factor degeneracy in SPIPS.
    Stated in Section 3.1; the paper argues this does not affect angular diameter or flux accuracy, but it is a modeling premise for the SPIPS solution.
  • ad hoc to paper The CSE can be modeled as a spherical shell with no geometrical thickness at radius 2.5 R_star.
    Introduced in Section 3.2 following Perrin et al. (2005) and near-IR constraints; the radius is fixed arbitrarily and affects the SPIPS star-plus-CSE visibility prediction.
  • ad hoc to paper The CSE brightness distribution in the upper-limit analysis is a Gaussian intensity profile.
    Section 6.4 explicitly states the Gaussian is used 'for simplicity, as we do not have physical justifications at this time'; the derived upper limits depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption DUSTY radiative transfer assumptions: blackbody central source, MRN grain size distribution, dust density proportional to r^-2, and the selected dust optical constants.
    Used in Section 6.5 to compute N-band visibilities and IR excesses for iron, silicate, and alumina dust test cases.
  • domain assumption Flux calibration templates from Cohen et al. (1999) or ATLAS9 models rescaled to JMMC UD angular diameters provide an accurate absolute flux scale.
    Applied in Section 4.1 for calibrating the MATISSE total and correlated fluxes; uncertainties in these templates propagate into the SED comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Circumstellar emission of Cepheids across the instability strip: Mid-infrared observations with VLTI/MATISSE." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WZ6KODDV

@misc{pith2026250100373,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Circumstellar emission of Cepheids across the instability strip: Mid-infrared observations with VLTI/MATISSE},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WZ6KODDV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00373}
}
abstract

The circumstellar envelopes (CSE) of Cepheids are still not well characterized despite their potential impact on distance determination via both the period-luminosity relation and the parallax-of-pulsation method. This paper aims to investigate Galactic Cepheids across the instability strip in the mid-infrared with MATISSE/VLTI in order to constrain the geometry and physical nature (gas and/or dust) of their CSEs. We secured observations of eight Galactic Cepheids from short up to long period of pulsation, with MATISSE/VLTI in $L$, $M$ and $N$-bands. The SED analysis in the mid-IR confirms the absence of dust spectral signature for all the star sample. For each star in $L$, $M$ and $N$-band we observe closure phases which are consistent with centro-symmetric geometry for the different targets. Finally, the visibilities in $L$, $M$ and $N$ bands are in agreement with the expected star angular diameter, although the observations are compatible with the presence of compact CSEs within the uncertainties. We provide 2$\,\sigma$ upper limits on the CSE flux contribution based on model residuals for several CSE radius, which yield to exclude models simultaneously large and bright ($R_\mathrm{CSE}\approx10\,R_\star$ and $f_\mathrm{CSE}\approx10\%$) for all the stars of the sample. Last, the visibilities in the $N$-band rule out CSE models with significant amount of different type of dust. The MATISSE observations of eight Cepheids with different pulsation period (from 7 up to 38$\,$day) and evolution stage, provide for the first time a comprehensive picture of Cepheids from mid-IR interferometry. We present additional evidences that circumstellar dust emission is negligible or absent around Cepheids for a wide range of stellar parameters in the instability strip. Further interferometric observations in the visible and the near-infrared will be necessary to disentangle the star and the CSE.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00373 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The SPIPS results of η Aql (a) and X Sgr (b) as a function of the pulsation phase. Above the figures, the p-factor is indicated, along with the fitted distance d, the fitted color excess E(B − V), and the parametric CSE model. The gray thick line corresponds to the best SPIPS model, which is composed of the latter model without CSE plus an IR excess model. In the angular diameter panels, the gray curve corresponds t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. IR excess derived by SPIPS for each star of the sample (see also [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. MATISSE calibrated flux in L, M and N bands together with ATLAS9 atmospheric model interpolated for each star by SPIPS at the specific pulsation phase of observations. The blue bars represent the photometry interpolated at the phase of MATISSE observations by SPIPS. In the case of U Aql, the N-band flux is the correlated flux. See Section 4 for details of the calibration. rive an excess up to about 50% of the MATISS… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: MATISSE calibrated squared visibilities in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visibility in N-band plotted against the wavelength. The black curve represents the weighted mean of the observations. U Aql is not presented since we measured only the correlated flux and X Sgr photometry in the N-band was not usable. Spectral band between 9.3 and 10 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of CSE models with a Gaussian brightness in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Reduced χ 2 map as a function of flux contribution fCSE and FWHM (RCSE) of the Gaussian CSE model in L and M bands. Cyan, orange and purple dashed lines represent differ￾ent CSE radius (FWHM) for which we provided upper limit on the CSE flux contribution displayed as a…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visibility in the N-band and IR excess from CSE models of dust computed with DUSTY for the Cepheid η Aql. From left to right the three cases correspond to iron, silicates and aluminum oxide in red, yellow and purple respectively. For each CSE models we used different o…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cepheid sample observed with MATISSE/VLTI (This work, and Hocdé et al. 2021) completed with δ Cep and Y Oph observed with CHARA (Mérand et al. 2006, 2007; Nardetto et al. 2016). The mean luminosity and effective temperature in the instability strip are derived by SPIPS…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Discovery of ionized circumstellar gas emission around the long-period Cepheid $\ell$ Carinae with ALMA

    astro-ph.SR 2025-01 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    ALMA observations of ℓ Carinae reveal 1mm continuum excess and a hydrogen H29α recombination line, providing the first direct evidence of an ionized gas envelope around a Cepheid.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Allouche , F., Robbe-Dubois , S., Lagarde , S., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9907, Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging V, 99070C

    2016

  4. [4]

    C., et al

    Alves , S., Benamati , L., Santos , N. C., et al. 2015, , 448, 2749

    2015

  5. [5]

    M., Robinson , S

    Ammons , S. M., Robinson , S. E., Strader , J., et al. 2006, , 638, 1004

    2006

  6. [6]

    Anderson , R. I. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02801

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    I., M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., et al

    Anderson , R. I., M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., et al. 2016, , 455, 4231

    2016

  8. [8]

    I., Viviani , G., Shetye , S

    Anderson , R. I., Viviani , G., Shetye , S. S., et al. 2024, , 686, A177

    2024

Show all 139 references
  1. [9]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  2. [10]

    1926, Astronomische Nachrichten, 228, 359

    Baade , W. 1926, Astronomische Nachrichten, 228, 359

    1926

  3. [11]

    R., et al

    Barmby , P., Marengo , M., Evans , N. R., et al. 2011, , 141, 42

    2011

  4. [12]

    G., Fernley , J

    Barnes , III, T. G., Fernley , J. A., Frueh , M. L., et al. 1997, , 109, 645

    1997

  5. [13]

    G., Storm , J., Jefferys , W

    Barnes , III, T. G., Storm , J., Jefferys , W. H., Gieren , W. P., & Fouqu \'e , P. 2005, , 631, 572

    2005

  6. [14]

    1997, , 476, 199

    Begemann , B., Dorschner , J., Henning , T., et al. 1997, , 476, 199

    1997

  7. [15]

    A., & Beck , S

    Berdnikov , L., Mattei , J. A., & Beck , S. J. 2003, , 31, 146

    2003

  8. [16]

    Berdnikov , L. N. 2008, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/285

    2008

  9. [17]

    Berdnikov , L. N. & Turner , D. G. 2002, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 213, 70209

    2002

  10. [18]

    Berger , J. P. & Segransan , D. 2007, , 51, 576

    2007

  11. [19]

    2006, , 77, 207

    Bono , G., Caputo , F., & Castellani , V. 2006, , 77, 207

    2006

  12. [20]

    2019, , 631, A37

    Borgniet , S., Kervella , P., Nardetto , N., et al. 2019, , 631, A37

    2019

  13. [21]

    2014 a , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bourg \'e s , L., Lafrasse , S., Mella , G., et al. 2014 a , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 485, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII, ed. N. Manset & P. Forshay , 223

    2014

  14. [22]

    2014 b , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bourg \'e s , L., Lafrasse , S., Mella , G., et al. 2014 b , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 485, Astronomical Data Anaylsis Softward and Systems XXIII, ed. N. Manset & P. Forshay , 223

    2014

  15. [23]

    2024, , 684, A126

    Bras , G., Kervella , P., Trahin , B., et al. 2024, , 684, A126

    2024

  16. [24]

    2016, , 587, A117

    Breitfelder , J., M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., et al. 2016, , 587, A117

    2016

  17. [25]

    2005, , 629, 1021

    Caputo , F., Bono , G., Fiorentino , G., Marconi , M., & Musella , I. 2005, , 629, 1021

    2005

  18. [26]

    & VandenBerg , D

    Casagrande , L. & VandenBerg , D. A. 2018, , 479, L102

    2018

  19. [27]

    & Kurucz , R

    Castelli , F. & Kurucz , R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov , W. W. Weiss , & D. F. Gray , A20

    2003

  20. [28]

    2016, , 589, A112

    Chelli , A., Duvert , G., Bourg \`e s , L., et al. 2016, , 589, A112

    2016

  21. [29]

    & Bloemen , S

    Claret , A. & Bloemen , S. 2011, , 529, A75

    2011

  22. [30]

    G., Carter , B., et al

    Cohen , M., Walker , R. G., Carter , B., et al. 1999, , 117, 1864

    1999

  23. [31]

    Coulson , I. M. & Caldwell , J. A. R. 1985, South African Astronomical Observatory Circular, 9, 5

    1985

  24. [32]

    G., Robbe-Dubois , S., et al

    Cruzal \`e bes , P., Petrov , R. G., Robbe-Dubois , S., et al. 2019, , 490, 3158

    2019

  25. [33]

    2022, , 511, 2125

    Cs \"o rnyei , G., Szabados , L., Moln \'a r , L., et al. 2022, , 511, 2125

    2022

  26. [34]

    J., Jacob , A

    Davis , J., Ireland , M. J., Jacob , A. P., et al. 2008, in The Power of Optical/IR Interferometry: Recent Scientific Results and 2nd Generation, ed. A. Richichi , F. Delplancke , F. Paresce , & A. Chelli , 105

    2008

  27. [35]

    & Butler , C

    Deasy , H. & Butler , C. J. 1986, , 320, 726

    1986

  28. [36]

    Deasy , H. P. 1988, , 231, 673

    1988

  29. [37]

    Draine , B. T. & Lee , H. M. 1984, , 285, 89

    1984

  30. [38]

    Eaton , J. A. 2020, , 48, 91

    2020

  31. [39]

    1997, ESA Special Publication, Vol

    ESA , ed. 1997, ESA Special Publication, Vol. 1200, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues. Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission

    1997

  32. [40]

    Feast , M. W. 2008, , 387, L33

    2008

  33. [41]

    B., Gillet , D., & Breitfellner , M

    Fokin , A. B., Gillet , D., & Breitfellner , M. G. 1996, , 307, 503

    1996

  34. [42]

    J., & Evans , N

    Fraschetti , F., Anastasopoulou , K., Drake , J. J., & Evans , N. R. 2023, , 944, 62

    2023

  35. [43]

    Freedman , W. L. & Madore , B. F. 2024, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 376, IAU Symposium, ed. R. de Grijs , P. A. Whitelock , & M. Catelan , 1--14

    2024

  36. [44]

    2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/355

    Gaia Collaboration . 2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/355

    2022

  37. [45]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1

    2018

  38. [46]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1

    2016

  39. [47]

    & Sedlmayr , E

    Gail , H.-P. & Sedlmayr , E. 1999, , 347, 594

    1999

  40. [48]

    2019, , 622, A164

    Gallenne , A., Kervella , P., Borgniet , S., et al. 2019, , 622, A164

    2019

  41. [49]

    R., et al

    Gallenne , A., Kervella , P., Evans , N. R., et al. 2018, , 867, 121

    2018

  42. [50]

    2012, , 538, A24

    Gallenne , A., Kervella , P., & M \'e rand , A. 2012, , 538, A24

    2012

  43. [51]

    2017, , 608, A18

    Gallenne , A., Kervella , P., M \'e rand , A., et al. 2017, , 608, A18

    2017

  44. [52]

    2013, , 558, A140

    Gallenne , A., M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., et al. 2013, , 558, A140

    2013

  45. [53]

    2021, , 651, A113

    Gallenne , A., M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., et al. 2021, , 651, A113

    2021

  46. [54]

    2017, , 602, A94

    GRAVITY Collaboration , Abuter , R., Accardo , M., et al. 2017, , 602, A94

    2017

  47. [55]

    Groenewegen , M. A. T. 2020, , 635, A33

    2020

  48. [56]

    Groenewegen , M. A. T. & Lub , J. 2023, , 676, A136

    2023

  49. [57]

    & Stognienko , R

    Henning , T. & Stognienko , R. 1996, , 311, 291

    1996

  50. [58]

    A., et al

    Hocd \'e , V., Moskalik , P., Gorynya , N. A., et al. 2024 a , , 689, A224

    2024

  51. [59]

    2020 a , , 641, A74

    Hocd \'e , V., Nardetto , N., Borgniet , S., et al. 2020 a , , 641, A74

    2020

  52. [60]

    2020 b , , 633, A47

    Hocd \'e , V., Nardetto , N., Lagadec , E., et al. 2020 b , , 633, A47

    2020

  53. [61]

    2021, , 651, A92

    Hocd \'e , V., Nardetto , N., Matter , A., et al. 2021, , 651, A92

    2021

  54. [62]

    2024 b , , 683, A233

    Hocd \'e , V., Smolec , R., Moskalik , P., Singh Rathour , R., & Zi \'o kowska , O. 2024 b , , 683, A233

    2024

  55. [63]

    1929 a , Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 15, 168

    Hubble , E. 1929 a , Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 15, 168

    1929

  56. [64]

    Hubble , E. P. 1925, , 62, 409

    1925

  57. [65]

    Hubble , E. P. 1926, , 63, 236

    1926

  58. [66]

    Hubble , E. P. 1929 b , , 69, 103

    1929

  59. [67]

    1999, DUSTY: Radiation transport in a dusty environment , Astrophysics Source Code Library

    Ivezic , Z., Nenkova , M., & Elitzur , M. 1999, DUSTY: Radiation transport in a dusty environment , Astrophysics Source Code Library

    1999

  60. [68]

    Jennison , R. C. 1958, , 118, 276

    1958

  61. [69]

    Keller , S. C. 2008, , 677, 483

    2008

  62. [70]

    2009, , 498, 425

    Kervella , P., M \'e rand , A., & Gallenne , A. 2009, , 498, 425

    2009

  63. [71]

    2006, , 448, 623

    Kervella , P., M \'e rand , A., Perrin , G., & Coud \'e du Foresto , V. 2006, , 448, 623

    2006

  64. [72]

    2004, , 416, 941

    Kervella , P., Nardetto , N., Bersier , D., Mourard , D., & Coud \'e du Foresto , V. 2004, , 416, 941

    2004

  65. [73]

    Kiss , L. L. 1998, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 135, A Half Century of Stellar Pulsation Interpretation, ed. P. A. Bradley & J. A. Guzik , 173

    1998

  66. [74]

    V., Andrievsky , S

    Kovtyukh , V. V., Andrievsky , S. M., Belik , S. I., & Luck , R. E. 2005, , 129, 433

    2005

  67. [75]

    V., Andrievsky , S

    Kovtyukh , V. V., Andrievsky , S. M., Werner , K., Korotin , S. A., & Kniazev , A. Y. 2024, , 684, A145

    2024

  68. [76]

    V., Chekhonadskikh , F

    Kovtyukh , V. V., Chekhonadskikh , F. A., Luck , R. E., et al. 2010, , 408, 1568

    2010

  69. [77]

    F., Creech-Eakman , M

    Lane , B. F., Creech-Eakman , M. J., & Nordgren , T. E. 2002, , 573, 330

    2002

  70. [78]

    Laney , C. D. & Stobie , R. S. 1992, , 93, 93

    1992

  71. [79]

    Leavitt , H. S. 1908, Annals of Harvard College Observatory, 60, 87

    1908

  72. [80]

    Leavitt , H. S. & Pickering , E. C. 1912, Harvard College Observatory Circular, 173, 1

    1912

  73. [81]

    1927, Annales de la Soci \'e t \'e Scientifique de Bruxelles, 47, 49

    Lema \^ tre , G. 1927, Annales de la Soci \'e t \'e Scientifique de Bruxelles, 47, 49

    1927

  74. [82]

    A., Hern \'a ndez , J., et al

    Lindegren , L., Klioner , S. A., Hern \'a ndez , J., et al. 2021, , 649, A2

    2021

  75. [83]

    2014, The Messenger, 157, 5

    Lopez , B., Lagarde , S., Jaffe , W., et al. 2014, The Messenger, 157, 5

    2014

  76. [84]

    G., et al

    Lopez , B., Lagarde , S., Petrov , R. G., et al. 2022, , 659, A192

    2022

  77. [85]

    Luck , R. E. 2018, , 156, 171

    2018

  78. [86]

    Luck , R. E. & Andrievsky , S. M. 2004, , 128, 343

    2004

  79. [87]

    Madore , B. F. 1975, , 29, 219

    1975

  80. [88]

    R., Barmby , P., et al

    Marengo , M., Evans , N. R., Barmby , P., et al. 2010 a , , 709, 120

    2010

  81. [89]

    R., Barmby , P., et al

    Marengo , M., Evans , N. R., Barmby , P., et al. 2010 b , , 725, 2392

    2010

  82. [90]

    S., Rumpl , W., & Nordsieck , K

    Mathis , J. S., Rumpl , W., & Nordsieck , K. H. 1977, , 217, 425

    1977

  83. [91]

    D., Marengo , M., & Evans , N

    Matthews , L. D., Marengo , M., & Evans , N. R. 2016, , 152, 200

    2016

  84. [92]

    D., Marengo , M., Evans , N

    Matthews , L. D., Marengo , M., Evans , N. R., & Bono , G. 2012, , 744, 53

    2012

  85. [93]

    McAlary , C. W. & Welch , D. L. 1986, , 91, 1209

    1986

  86. [94]

    2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    M \'e rand , A. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12183, Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VIII, ed. A. M \'e rand , S. Sallum , & J. Sanchez-Bermudez , 121831N

    2022

  87. [95]

    P., Kervella , P., et al

    M \'e rand , A., Aufdenberg , J. P., Kervella , P., et al. 2007, , 664, 1093

    2007

  88. [96]

    2015 a , , 584, A80

    M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., Breitfelder , J., et al. 2015 a , , 584, A80

    2015

  89. [97]

    2015 b , , 584, A80

    M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., Breitfelder , J., et al. 2015 b , , 584, A80

    2015

  90. [98]

    2006, , 453, 155

    M \'e rand , A., Kervella , P., Coud \'e du Foresto , V., et al. 2006, , 453, 155

    2006

  91. [99]

    2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Millour , F., Berio , P., Heininger , M., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9907, , 990723

    2016

  92. [100]

    Moffett , T. J. & Barnes , III, T. G. 1984, , 55, 389

    1984

  93. [101]

    J., Freedman , W

    Monson , A. J., Freedman , W. L., Madore , B. F., et al. 2012, , 759, 146

    2012

  94. [102]

    Monson , A. J. & Pierce , M. J. 2011, , 193, 12

    2011

  95. [103]

    J., et al

    Moschou , S.-P., Vlahakis , N., Drake , J. J., et al. 2020, , 900, 157

    2020

  96. [104]

    2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Mourard , D., Berio , P., Pannetier , C., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12183, Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VIII, ed. A. M \'e rand , S. Sallum , & J. Sanchez-Bermudez , 1218308

    2022

  97. [105]

    2023, , 671, A14

    Nardetto , N., Gieren , W., Storm , J., et al. 2023, , 671, A14

    2023

  98. [106]

    2016, , 593, A45

    Nardetto , N., M \'e rand , A., Mourard , D., et al. 2016, , 593, A45

    2016

  99. [107]

    2020, , 639, A67

    Nardetto , N., Salsi , A., Mourard , D., et al. 2020, , 639, A67

    2020

  100. [108]

    R., Cantiello , M., & Langer , N

    Neilson , H. R., Cantiello , M., & Langer , N. 2011, , 529, L9

    2011

  101. [109]

    Neilson , H. R. & Lester , J. B. 2008, , 684, 569

    2008

  102. [110]

    R., Ngeow , C.-C., Kanbur , S

    Neilson , H. R., Ngeow , C.-C., Kanbur , S. M., & Lester , J. B. 2009, , 692, 81

    2009

  103. [111]

    R., Ngeow , C.-C., Kanbur , S

    Neilson , H. R., Ngeow , C.-C., Kanbur , S. M., & Lester , J. B. 2010, , 716, 1136

    2010

  104. [112]

    Ossenkopf , V., Henning , T., & Mathis , J. S. 1992, , 261, 567

    1992

  105. [113]

    Pel , J. W. 1976, , 24, 413

    1976

  106. [114]

    T., Verhoelst , T., et al

    Perrin , G., Ridgway , S. T., Verhoelst , T., et al. 2005, , 436, 317

    2005

  107. [115]

    G., Allouche , F., Matter , A., et al

    Petrov , R. G., Allouche , F., Matter , A., et al. 2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11446, Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VII, ed. P. G. Tuthill , A. M \'e rand , & S. Sallum , 114460L

    2020

  108. [116]

    B., Gieren , W., et al

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Thompson , I. B., Gieren , W., et al. 2010, , 468, 542

    2010

  109. [117]

    V., et al

    Proxauf , B., da Silva , R., Kovtyukh , V. V., et al. 2018, , 616, A82

    2018

  110. [118]

    S., Hajdu , G., Smolec , R., et al

    Rathour , R. S., Hajdu , G., Smolec , R., et al. 2024, , 686, A268

    2024

  111. [119]

    G., Anand , G

    Riess , A. G., Anand , G. S., Yuan , W., et al. 2024 a , , 962, L17

    2024

  112. [120]

    G., Scolnic , D., Anand , G

    Riess , A. G., Scolnic , D., Anand , G. S., et al. 2024 b , , 977, 120

    2024

  113. [121]

    G., Yuan , W., Macri , L

    Riess , A. G., Yuan , W., Macri , L. M., et al. 2022, , 934, L7

    2022

  114. [122]

    2022, , 510, 82

    Robbe-Dubois , S., Cruzal \`e bes , P., Berio , P., et al. 2022, , 510, 82

    2022

  115. [123]

    2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Robbe-Dubois , S., Lagarde , S., Antonelli , P., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10701, Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VI, 107010H

    2018

  116. [124]

    Schmidt , E. G. 2015, , 813, 29

    2015

  117. [125]

    & Sterzik , M

    Sch \"u tz , O. & Sterzik , M. 2005, in High Resolution Infrared Spectroscopy in Astronomy, 104--108

    2005

  118. [126]

    L., et al

    Scowcroft , V., Seibert , M., Freedman , W. L., et al. 2016, , 459, 1170

    2016

  119. [127]

    W., Gieren , W

    Storm , J., Carney , B. W., Gieren , W. P., et al. 2004, , 415, 531

    2004

  120. [128]

    2011, , 534, A95

    Storm , J., Gieren , W., Fouqu \'e , P., et al. 2011, , 534, A95

    2011

  121. [129]

    1981, Commmunications of the Konkoly Observatory Hungary, 77, 1

    Szabados , L. 1981, Commmunications of the Konkoly Observatory Hungary, 77, 1

    1981

  122. [130]

    2021, , 656, A102

    Trahin , B., Breuval , L., Kervella , P., et al. 2021, , 656, A102

    2021

  123. [131]

    G., Abdel-Sabour Abdel-Latif , M., & Berdnikov , L

    Turner , D. G., Abdel-Sabour Abdel-Latif , M., & Berdnikov , L. N. 2006, , 118, 410

    2006

  124. [132]

    A., Kniazev , A

    Usenko , I. A., Kniazev , A. Y., Berdnikov , L. N., & Kravtsov , V. V. 2011, Astronomy Letters, 37, 499

    2011

  125. [133]

    Valentino, E. D. & Brout, D., eds. 2024, The Hubble Constant Tension, 1st edn., Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology No. VII, 686 (Springer Singapore), VII, 686, published: 10 July 2024; Due: 24 July 2025

    2024

  126. [134]

    H., Tinbergen , J., & Walraven , T

    Walraven , J. H., Tinbergen , J., & Walraven , T. 1964, , 17, 520

    1964

  127. [135]

    L., Wieland , F., McAlary , C

    Welch , D. L., Wieland , F., McAlary , C. W., et al. 1984, , 54, 547

    1984

  128. [136]

    Wesselink , A. J. 1946, , 10, 91

    1946

  129. [137]

    2024, , 689, A241

    Wielg \'o rski , P., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Gieren , W., et al. 2024, , 689, A241

    2024

  130. [138]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868

    2010

  131. [139]

    2024, , 690, A295

    Zgirski , B., Gieren , W., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., et al. 2024, , 690, A295

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.