Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 73 references

Production of linear alkanes via the solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that hydrogen atoms striking a 10 K ice made of UV-photolyzed acetylene convert its polyyne products into n-butane and, tentatively, n-hexane, establishing a solid-state route from interstellar carbon chains to…

desk verdict Solid two-step lab study extending alkane formation to C4/C6 polyynes, but the missing no-UV control leaves the central product assignment conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03031 v1 pith:SVC7T52B submitted 2025-01-06 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRphysics.chem-ph

classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRphysics.chem-ph
keywords interstellaricespolyynessurfacehydrogenationalkanesdarkcloudslaboratoryastrochemistrytemperature-programmeddesorptioninfraredspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports laboratory experiments showing that when hydrogen atoms strike a 10 K ice whose acetylene has been partly converted by ultraviolet light into larger polyynes (C$_4$H$_2$, C$_6$H$_2$), the triple bonds become saturated, producing n-butane and, tentatively, n-hexane alongside the already known ethane. The authors argue this closes a gap in astrochemistry: unsaturated carbon chains are abundant in dark clouds, while fully saturated hydrocarbons are seen in comets and asteroid samples, and a grain-surface hydrogenation route could connect the two. Their kinetic data suggest that the hydrogenation of the HCCH and HCCCCH triple bonds proceeds at comparable rates, so the same H-atom fluences that make ethane should also make larger linear alkanes on dark-cloud timescales of roughly 100,000 to 200,000 years. They also propose that the same mechanism, applied to nitrogen- or oxygen-bearing polyynes, could generate aliphatic nitriles, alcohols, and thiols, and that the overlapping infrared bands of alkanes could be searched for with JWST.

What carries the argument

The central experimental device is a two-step, in situ synthesis: a thin C$_2$H$_2$ ice is first exposed to UV photons (≥121 nm) to partially polymerize it into C$_4$H$_2$ and C$_6$H$_2$, and the same ice is then exposed to an H-atom beam at 10 K; polyynes are linear carbon chains built from alternating C≡C triple bonds. Product identification rests on two complementary diagnostics: QMS-TPD, which uses both desorption temperature and mass fragments (m/z = 58, 43, 29 for n-C$_4$H$_{10}$), and RAIRS, which tracks the growth of CH stretching bands, including the 2925 cm$^{-1}$ asymmetric $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ stretch characteristic of saturated linear chains. The kinetic argument is carried by the RAIRS absorption areas of consumed polyynes and produced alkanes as functions of H-atom fluence, which show no delay between the consumption curves and the production curves, indicating that hydrogenation of the intermediate double bonds is faster than hydrogenation of the parent triple bonds.

What would settle it

An experiment that deposits C$_4$H$_2$ ice directly, or uses D atoms instead of H, and monitors the desorption would settle the matter: if m/z = 58 (and, for D addition, the shifted parent mass) does not appear at roughly 95 to 115 K while m/z = 43 and 29 do, or if the 58/43/29 ratios do not match the n-butane pattern once the ethane contribution is subtracted, then the central product identification fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that fully saturated linear alkanes form by the hydrogenation of C$_{2n}$H$_2$ polyynes on a 10 K surface, with n-C$_4$H$_{10}$ confirmed by temperature-programmed desorption (parent mass m/z = 58 plus fragments 43 and 29) and by RAIRS evidence of the $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ asymmetric stretch, and n-C$_6$H$_{14}$ tentatively identified from fragment signals at a higher desorption temperature without a detected parent mass. The authors further claim that the reaction rates for H-atom addition to the triple bonds of acetylene and diacetylene are similar, because the consumption and production kinetics reach their plateaus at the same H-atom fluence. They conclude that such hydrogenation occurs on timescales typical of dark cloud stages, making saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons part of the pristine ice inventory that could later be delivered to comets and asteroids.

Load-bearing premise

The assignment of n-butane rests on the assumption that the mass signals seen near 95 to 115 K come from a single desorbing population of C$_4$H$_{10}$, and the authors note that co-desorbing trapped ethane is needed to explain some fragment intensities, yet no quantitative correction for that contamination is given.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the route is correct, saturated alkanes should be present in dark-cloud ice mantles well before star formation, because the required H-atom fluence corresponds to roughly 100,000 to 200,000 years at typical cloud fluxes.
  • The comparable hydrogenation rates for C$_2$H$_2$ and C$_4$H$_2$ mean that once polyynes are made or accreted, they will be processed to alkanes just as efficiently as acetylene, so chain length does not slow the saturation chemistry.
  • The formation of n-alkanes on grains offers a direct chemical explanation for the dominance of linear over cyclic saturated hydrocarbons in comet 67P, since hydrogenation of linear polyynes preserves the carbon skeleton.
  • The overlapping CH$_3$ and $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ infrared bands of alkanes could be observed as a class with JWST, giving a family-level probe of saturated organics in the ice mantles of prestellar sources.
  • The same two-step experimental approach could be applied to mixed HCN/C$_2$H$_2$ ices to test whether cyanopolyyne hydrogenation yields aliphatic nitriles and amines, as the authors propose.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test the paper does not report: hydrogenating pure C$_4$H$_2$ or using D atoms instead of H should shift the parent and daughter masses, confirming the n-C$_4$H$_{10}$ assignment and placing the tentative n-C$_6$H$_{14}$ identification on firmer ground by searching for m/z = 86.
  • If hydrogenation of accreted polyynes is as fast as the paper suggests, grain surfaces could act as a reservoir that later releases semi-saturated hydrocarbons into the gas; the relative abundances of alkenes and alkynes in TMC-1 might then carry a grain-chemistry fingerprint.
  • The comparable rates for C$_2$H$_2$ and C$_4$H$_2$ hydrogenation imply that the bottleneck for alkane formation in dark clouds is H-atom supply and accretion, not the size of the carbon chain; a quantitative model coupling gas-phase polyyne formation with grain-surface saturation could be tested against observed alkane and alkyne ratios.
  • If alkanes formed by this route are later incorporated into planetary bodies, the $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ to CH$_3$ ratio of Ryugu (1.9) may be a rough proxy for the average chain length produced on grains, making the laboratory kinetic curves directly relevant to interpreting returned-sample spectra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports laboratory experiments in which ~10 ML of C2H2 ice is UV-photolyzed at 10 K to produce larger polyynes (C4H2, C6H2) and is then exposed to an H-atom beam. Using QMS-TPD and RAIRS, the authors attribute new desorption features at 95-115 K (m/z 58, 43, 29) to n-C4H10 and a weaker feature at 125-150 K tentatively to C6H14, with the caveat that the m/z 86 parent ion was not observed. They infer that H-atom addition to the triple bonds of HCCH and HCCCCH proceeds at comparable rates at 10 K, that such hydrogenation can occur on dark-cloud timescales, and they propose a general solid-state route to saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons relevant to comet 67P and asteroid Ryugu.

Significance. If the product identification holds, this is a valuable first experimental demonstration that saturated alkanes can be produced by hydrogenating polyynes on cold grain surfaces, thereby connecting gas-phase carbon-chain detections in TMC-1 with the aliphatic hydrocarbon inventories of comets and asteroids. The paper has clear strengths: unstable polyynes are synthesized in situ in the same UHV setup, product assignment uses two independent criteria (m/z and desorption temperature), comparisons are made with NIST fragmentation patterns and literature desorption temperatures, difference spectra with and without H exposure are shown, and astronomically relevant H-atom fluences are used. The main caveats are the absence of a no-UV control needed to exclude C2H5 + C2H5 recombination as a C4H10 source, the blended and non-species-specific IR bands behind the rate comparison, and the appropriately tentative nature of the C6H14 assignment.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.1, Figs. 1-3; Appendix B] The central product assignment—that the observed n-C4H10 results from hydrogenation of C4H2—is not uniquely supported because no control experiment using unphotolyzed C2H2 ice is reported. The starting ice is 10 ML of C2H2 with only partial UV conversion, so the H-atom exposure necessarily creates C2H5 radicals from the dominant C2H2 component; the barrierless recombination C2H5 + C2H5 → n-C4H10 yields the same parent m/z = 58 and similar fragment ions. The previously cited pure-C2H2 hydrogenation studies (Kobayashi et al. 2017; Hiraoka et al. 2000) are not stated to have searched for m/z = 58, so they do not close this gap. A control run with unphotolyzed C2H2 at the same H fluence, or a quantitative estimate/measurement of the C2H5 recombination channel, is required before the C4H10 yield can be attributed to polyyne hydrogenation.
  2. [3.2, Fig. 7] The claim of comparable hydrogenation rates for HCCH and HCCCCH (Abstract; Section 4) is weaker than presented. The 'C4H2' consumption curve in Fig. 7 integrates the 3308-3265 cm−1 region, which the caption explicitly states also contains the ν1 band of C4H4, and the 'C4H10' production curve is the 2929-2909 cm−1 CH2 stretch common to all saturated linear alkanes, including C6H14. With these blended bands and no species-specific band strengths or error bars, the simultaneous reaching of plateaus within the same fluence interval shows only that the tracked features saturate together; it does not quantify rate coefficients for the individual triple-bond hydrogenation steps. Please soften the rate conclusion to a consistency statement or provide deconvolved, abundance-calibrated kinetics.
  3. [Appendix B, Fig. B.1] The fragmentation-pattern support for n-C4H10 is not quantitatively clean. Appendix B states that co-desorption of trapped C2H6 is required to explain the high relative intensities of m/z = 27, 29, and 30 at 105 and 138 K, yet the m/z = 29 channel is part of the argument for C4H10 and C6H14. No subtraction or error budget is provided for this contribution. Although the parent m/z = 58 peak is a strong indicator of a C4H10 species, the reported fragment-ratio agreement should either be corrected for the C2H6 contribution or presented with explicit uncertainty limits.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, first paragraph] The text reads '...formation of C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, and C3H8 by surface hydrogenation of simplest alkynes C2H2 and C3H8'; the second 'C3H8' should almost certainly be 'C3H4' (propyne).
  2. [Section 3.1, third paragraph] The text says the 125-150 K feature is assigned 'through the rise of m/z = 29', but Fig. 3 and the following paragraph also use m/z = 43; please state both channels in the assignment sentence.
  3. [Fig. 7] Adding error bars, including the systematic uncertainty in the RAIRS calibration and in the H-atom fluence, would make the stated plateau values and the inferred 10^5-year timescale easier to evaluate.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'including C4H10 and (tentatively) C6H14, is confirmed' is grammatically ambiguous; it should be made explicit that only C4H10 is confirmed and C6H14 is tentative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper reports experimental TPD and RAIRS measurements checked against external NIST spectra and literature desorption temperatures, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental laboratory study, not a derivation. The central claims—that H-atom exposure of UV-photolyzed C2H2 ice at 10 K yields C4H10 and plausibly C6H14, and that the hydrogenation of C4H2 triple bonds proceeds at rates comparable to C2H2—are supported by two independent in-situ diagnostics: QMS-TPD and RAIRS. Product identifications are checked against external references: the m/z = 58, 43, and 29 signals are compared with NIST mass spectra (Appendix B), and desorption temperatures are compared with literature values (Abplanalp & Kaiser 2017; Kim & Kaiser 2009). The kinetic comparison in Fig. 7 is a direct, qualitative reading of measured absorbance-area profiles reaching plateaus at similar H-atom fluences; no rate parameters are fitted from the data and then reused to force the conclusion. The paper explicitly discloses the two main spectral ambiguities: the C4H2 (nu4) band is blended with C4H4 (nu1), and the 2929-2909 cm-1 feature used to track C4H10 is a generic -CH2- stretch common to linear alkanes. These are stated limitations in interpretation, not circular reductions. The only calibration step, deriving the C2H2 RAIRS band strength from the literature result of Kobayashi et al. (2017) that about 1 ML of C2H2 is consumed upon hydrogenation, is a measurement conversion and is not used to predict the target products; it is also anchored in an independent prior study, not solely in the authors' own work. Self-citations (Ioppolo et al. 2013; Chuang et al. 2018b) are used only for experimental methodology details such as the top-monolayer availability assumption, which is additionally corroborated by the independent Kobayashi et al. (2017) result. No uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled via self-citation, and no equation that defines one claimed output in terms of another claimed output were found. The paper also acknowledges in Appendix B that co-desorption of trapped C2H6 contributes to some fragment signals, and it does not overstate the certainty of the n-C6H14 identification. Consequently, no step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental calibration assumptions and on the interpretation of mass spectra and infrared bands, but no new physical entities are postulated. The only fitted constant is a setup-specific IR band strength used for calibration.

free parameters (1)
  • Setup-specific RAIRS band strength for C2H2 CH stretch = 6.5e-17 cm molecule^-1
    Derived in Sec. 2.2 from the assumed consumption of exactly one monolayer of C2H2 during H-atom exposure; used for calibration and not directly in the alkane assignment, but it is a model-dependent constant.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Only the top monolayer of the C2H2 ice is available for hydrogenation by incident H atoms.
    Assumed in Sec. 2.2 following Ioppolo et al. 2013 and Chuang et al. 2018b, and used to derive the setup-specific C2H2 band strength; if H atoms penetrate deeper, the derived band strength and the interpretation of consumption fractions change.
  • domain assumption Desorption temperature and m/z pattern uniquely identify the desorbing molecules.
    Used throughout Sec. 3.1 for C2H6, C4H10, and tentative C6H14; the paper itself notes in Appendix B that trapped C2H6 complicates fragment intensities.
  • domain assumption UV photolysis of C2H2 ice produces C4H2, C6H2, and C4H4 as assigned, based on literature IR spectra.
    Relies on reference spectra from Zhou et al. 2009 and Kim & Kaiser 2009, and on assumptions about which bands are separable; the Fig. 7 caption admits C4H2 and C4H4 overlap.
  • domain assumption The H-atom beam does not cause significant non-reactive loss of the ice, so observed TPD area drops are attributed to hydrogenation.
    Controls compare UV-exposed ice with and without H exposure, but no assessment of physical sputtering by the H beam is given in Sec. 3.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Production of linear alkanes via the solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SVC7T52B

@misc{pith2026250103031,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Production of linear alkanes via the solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SVC7T52B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03031}
}
abstract

Highly unsaturated carbon chains, including polyynes, have been detected in many astronomical regions and planetary systems. With the success of the QUIJOTE survey of the TMC-1, the community has seen a "boom" in the number of detected carbon chains. On the other hand, the Rosetta mission revealed the release of fully saturated hydrocarbons, C$_3$H$_8$, C$_4$H$_{10}$, C$_5$H$_{12}$, and (under specific conditions) C$_6$H$_{14}$ with C$_7$H$_{16}$, from the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. The detection of the latter two is attributed to dust-rich events. Similarly, the analysis of samples returned from asteroid Ryugu by Hayabusa2 mission indicates the presence of long saturated aliphatic chains in Ryugu's organic matter. The surface chemistry of unsaturated carbon chains under conditions resembling those of molecular clouds can provide a possible link among these independent observations. However, laboratory-based investigations to validate such a chemistry is still lacking. In the present study, we aim to experimentally verify the formation of fully saturated hydrocarbons by the surface hydrogenation of C$_{2n}$H$_2$ ($n>1$) polyynes under ultra-high vacuum conditions at 10 K. We undertook a two-step experimental technique. First, a thin layer of C$_2$H$_2$ ice was irradiated by UV-photons ($\geq$ 121 nm) to achieve a partial conversion of C$_2$H$_2$ into larger polyynes: C$_4$H$_2$ and C$_6$H$_2$. Afterwards, the obtained photoprocessed ice was exposed to H atoms to verify the formation of various saturated hydrocarbons. In addition to C$_2$H$_6$, which was investigated previously, the formation of larger alkanes, including C$_4$H$_{10}$ and (tentatively) C$_6$H$_{14}$, is confirmed by our study. A qualitative analysis of the obtained kinetic data indicates that hydrogenation of HCCH and HCCCCH triple bonds proceeds at comparable rates, given a surface temperature of 10 K.}

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03031 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: QMS-TPD spectra in the range from 50 to 225 K for the selected m/z values obtained after the UV-exposure of 10 ML of pure HCCH ice with 4.6 × 1016 photons cm−2 at 10 K. Right: QMS-TPD spectrum obtained after the hydrogenation of UV-exposed ice with 1.3 × 1017 cm−2 atoms at 10 K. The ordinate axis is presented as a logarithm of 10. An exponential decay of ion intensity appears as a straight line. reported for p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Direct comparison between the fragments of QMS-TPD spectra in the range from 50 to 225 K obtained after the UV-exposure of 10 ML thick pure HCCH ice at 10 K with >4.6 × 1016 cm−2 photons (black empty circles) and the subsequent exposure of this photoprocessed ice with 1.3 × 1017 cm−2 H atoms at 10 K (red filled circles). The results obtained upon subtraction of the initial mass spectrum from the mass spectrum obtain… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Similar to Figs. 2 and 3. M/z signals associated with the semi￾saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons are presented. m/z = 56 (C4H8 + ) and m/z = 27 (CH2CH+ ) signals in the range from 100 to 115 K is consistent with the desorption of 1-butene (CH2CHCH2CH3). The lower desorption temperature registered for m/z = 56 (C4H8 + ) in comparison to m/z=52 (C4H4 + ) and m/z=54 (C4H6 + ) is in line with the higher hydrogenation deg… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: RAIR spectra obtained after the deposition of 10 ML of HCCH ice at 10 K (a, black line), after the exposure of this obtained ice with 4.6 × 1016 cm−2 photons (b, red line) and by subtracting the initial spectrum (a) from spectrum (b) (green line). Right: RAIR spe…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Zoom-in into the CH stretching vibration modes region for the RAIR difference spectrum obtained after hydrogenation of UV-exposed C2H2 ice (green line). See the right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Kinetic curves obtained for C2H2, C6H2, C4H2, and C4H10. Note: the area of the (ν4) absorption feature of C4H2 cannot be deconvoluted from the contribution of the (ν1) absorption feature of C4H4. Thus, the combined area is used for the integration. The modulus of absor…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic representation of the overall suggested mechanism. Various polyynes observed in dark clouds (e.g., TMC-1) are presented in the left part of the reaction scheme. The accretion of polyynes on the surface of the grains is followed by hydrogenation of their unsat…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abplanalp, M. J. & Kaiser, R. I. 2017, ApJ, 836, 195

  2. [2]

    Abplanalp, M. J. & Kaiser, R. I. 2020, ApJ, 889, 3 Agúndez, M., Marcelino, N., Tercero, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, L4

  3. [3]

    J., et al

    Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., Berthelier, J. J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S130

  4. [4]

    T., Zingsheim, O., Müller, H

    Belloche, A., Garrod, R. T., Zingsheim, O., Müller, H. S. P., & Menten, K. M. 2022, A&A, 662, A110

  5. [5]

    B., Guzmán, V

    Bergner, J. B., Guzmán, V . G., Öberg, K. I., Loomis, R. A., & Pegues, J. 2018, ApJ, 857, 69

  6. [6]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 541

  7. [7]

    Brown, R. L. 1981, ApJ, 248, L119 Article number, page 9 of 12 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa52210-24corr

  8. [8]

    2016, A&A, 593, A60

    Butscher, T., Duvernay, F., Danger, G., & Chiavassa, T. 2016, A&A, 593, A60

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    2017, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transac- tions), 19, 2857

    Butscher, T., Duvernay, F., Rimola, A., Segado-Centellas, M., & Chiavassa, T. 2017, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transac- tions), 19, 2857

  2. [10]

    2015, MNRAS, 453, 1587

    Butscher, T., Duvernay, F., Theule, P., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 1587

  3. [11]

    2022, A&A, 663, L5

    Cernicharo, J., Fuentetaja, R., Cabezas, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, L5

  4. [12]

    M., Tielens, A

    Cernicharo, J., Heras, A. M., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 2001, ApJ, 546, L123

  5. [13]

    2020, A&A, 642, L8

    Cernicharo, J., Marcelino, N., Agúndez, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, L8

  6. [14]

    2024, A&A, 686, A139

    Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., Agúndez, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A139

  7. [15]

    J., Chuang, K

    Chen, Y . J., Chuang, K. J., Muñoz Caro, G. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 15

  8. [16]

    Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Vazquez-Semadeni, E., et al. 2020, Space Sci. Rev., 216, 50

  9. [17]

    J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al

    Chuang, K. J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A199

  10. [18]

    J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al

    Chuang, K. J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2552

  11. [19]

    J., Fedoseev, G., Scirè, C., et al

    Chuang, K. J., Fedoseev, G., Scirè, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A85

  12. [20]

    J., Jäger, C., Santos, J

    Chuang, K. J., Jäger, C., Santos, J. C., & Henning, T. 2024, A&A, 687, A7

  13. [21]

    & Gould, J

    Comeford, J. & Gould, J. H. 1961, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 5, 474

  14. [22]

    2009, Carbon, 47, 1605

    Compagnini, G., D’Urso, L., Puglisi, O., Baratta, G., & Strazzulla, G. 2009, Carbon, 47, 1605

  15. [23]

    R., Pilleri, P., et al

    Cuadrado, S., Goicoechea, J. R., Pilleri, P., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A82

  16. [24]

    H., Zhao, D., Strazzulla, G., & Linnartz, H

    Cuylle, S. H., Zhao, D., Strazzulla, G., & Linnartz, H. 2014, A&A, 570, A83 De Sanctis, M. C., Ammannito, E., McSween, H. Y ., et al. 2017, Science, 355, 719

  17. [25]

    Fatima, M., Müller, H. S. P., Zingsheim, O., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A25

  18. [26]

    J., Ioppolo, S., et al

    Fedoseev, G., Chuang, K. J., Ioppolo, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 52

  19. [27]

    J., van Dishoeck, E

    Fedoseev, G., Chuang, K. J., van Dishoeck, E. F., Ioppolo, S., & Linnartz, H. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4297

  20. [28]

    M., Ioppolo, S., Lamberts, T., & Linnartz, H

    Fedoseev, G., Cuppen, H. M., Ioppolo, S., Lamberts, T., & Linnartz, H. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1288

  21. [29]

    2022, ApJ, 924, 110

    Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., Chuang, K.-J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 924, 110

  22. [30]

    Gerakines, P. A. & Moore, M. H. 2001, Icarus, 154, 372 Guzmán, V . V ., Bergner, J. B., Law, C. J., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 6 Hänni, N., Altwegg, K., Baklouti, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A22 Hänni, N., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A22 Hänni, N., Altwegg, K...

  23. [31]

    2000, ApJ, 532, 1029

    Hiraoka, K., Takayama, T., Euchi, A., Handa, H., & Sato, T. 2000, ApJ, 532, 1029

  24. [32]

    Hopkins, B. J. & Riviere, J. C. 1964, British Journal of Applied Physics, 15, 941

  25. [33]

    L., Ferrante, R

    Hudson, R. L., Ferrante, R. F., & Moore, M. H. 2014, Icarus, 228, 276

  26. [34]

    D., Walsh, C., Booth, A

    Ilee, J. D., Walsh, C., Booth, A. S., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 9

  27. [35]

    2013, Review of Scientific Instruments, 84, 073112

    Ioppolo, S., Fedoseev, G., Lamberts, T., Romanzin, C., & Linnartz, H. 2013, Review of Scientific Instruments, 84, 073112

  28. [36]

    Irvine, W. M. & Hjalmarson, A. 1984, Origins of Life, 14, 15 Jiménez-Serra, I., Rodríguez-Almeida, L. F., Martín-Pintado, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A181

  29. [37]

    Jo, S. K. & White, J. M. 1991, J. Chem. Phys., 94, 5761

  30. [38]

    1995, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 174, 116

    Khlifi, M., Paillous, P., Delpech, C., et al. 1995, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 174, 116

  31. [39]

    S., Bennett, C

    Kim, Y . S., Bennett, C. J., Chen, L.-H., O’Brien, K., & Kaiser, R. I. 2010, ApJ, 711, 744

  32. [40]

    Kim, Y . S. & Kaiser, R. I. 2009, ApJS, 181, 543

  33. [41]

    2017, ApJ, 837, 155

    Kobayashi, H., Hidaka, H., Lamberts, T., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 155

  34. [42]

    Lee, K. L. K., Loomis, R. A., Burkhardt, A. M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, L11

  35. [43]

    Ligterink, N. F. W., Paardekooper, D. M., Chuang, K. J., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A56

  36. [44]

    A., Burkhardt, A

    Loomis, R. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Shingledecker, C. N., et al. 2021, Nature As- tronomy, 5, 188

  37. [45]

    I., & Jones, B

    Maity, S., Kaiser, R. I., & Jones, B. M. 2015, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions), 17, 3081 Martín, S., Mangum, J. G., Harada, N., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A46

  38. [46]

    A., Burkhardt, A

    McGuire, B. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Shingledecker, C. N., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, L28

  39. [47]

    2016, MNRAS, 458, 2953

    Minissale, M., Moudens, A., Baouche, S., Chaabouni, H., & Dulieu, F. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2953

  40. [48]

    & Palumbo, M

    Modica, P. & Palumbo, M. E. 2010, A&A, 519, A22

  41. [49]

    & Rivilla, V

    Molpeceres, G. & Rivilla, V . M. 2022, A&A, 665, A27

  42. [50]

    2019, A&A, 628, A15

    Nguyen, T., Fourré, I., Favre, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A15

  43. [51]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 228 Öberg, K

    Oba, Y ., Tomaru, T., Lamberts, T., Kouchi, A., & Watanabe, N. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 228 Öberg, K. I., Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 109 Öberg, K. I., Garrod, R. T., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Linnartz, H. 2009, A&A, 504, 891

  44. [52]

    R., Cernicharo, J., & Goicoechea, J

    Pardo, J. R., Cernicharo, J., & Goicoechea, J. R. 2005, ApJ, 628, 275

  45. [53]

    R., Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., et al

    Pardo, J. R., Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A39

  46. [54]

    2014, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 326, 2

    Puglisi, O., Compagnini, G., D’Urso, L., et al. 2014, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 326, 2

  47. [55]

    2015, Science, 348, 232

    Rubin, M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., et al. 2015, Science, 348, 232

  48. [56]

    & Yamamoto, S

    Sakai, N. & Yamamoto, S. 2013, Chemical Reviews, 113, 8981

  49. [57]

    C., Enrique-Romero, J., Lamberts, T., Linnartz, H., & Chuang, K.-J

    Santos, J. C., Enrique-Romero, J., Lamberts, T., Linnartz, H., & Chuang, K.-J. 2024, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 8, 1646

  50. [58]

    2019, A&A, 630, A31 Segré, D., Ben-Eli, D., Deamer, D

    Schuhmann, M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A31 Segré, D., Ben-Eli, D., Deamer, D. W., & Lancet, D. 2001, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 31, 119

  51. [59]

    2015, Science Advances, 1, 1400067

    Stevenson, J., Lunine, J., & Clancy, P. 2015, Science Advances, 1, 1400067

  52. [60]

    & Baratta, G

    Strazzulla, G. & Baratta, G. A. 1992, A&A, 266, 434

  53. [61]

    Taniguchi, K., Gorai, P., & Tan, J. C. 2024, Ap&SS, 369, 34

  54. [62]

    2019, ApJ, 884, 167

    Taniguchi, K., Herbst, E., Ozeki, H., & Saito, M. 2019, ApJ, 884, 167

  55. [63]

    2017, ApJ, 846, 46

    Taniguchi, K., Ozeki, H., & Saito, M. 2017, ApJ, 846, 46

  56. [64]

    2016, ApJ, 830, 106

    Taniguchi, K., Saito, M., & Ozeki, H. 2016, ApJ, 830, 106

  57. [65]

    2011, A&A, 534, A64 Tørneng, E., Nielsen, C

    Theule, P., Borget, F., Mispelaer, F., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A64 Tørneng, E., Nielsen, C. J., Klaeboe, P., Hopf, H., & Priebe, H. 1980, Spec- trochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, 36, 975

  58. [66]

    Trevors, J. T. & Psenner, R. 2001, FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 25, 573

  59. [67]

    Tschersich, K. G. 2000, Journal of Applied Physics, 87, 2565

  60. [68]

    M., Abplanalp, M

    Turner, A. M., Abplanalp, M. J., Blair, T. J., Dayuha, R., & Kaiser, R. I. 2018, ApJS, 234, 6

  61. [69]

    G., Palumbo, M

    Urso, R. G., Palumbo, M. E., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A72 van Dishoeck, E. F., Grant, S., Tabone, B., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245, 52

  62. [70]

    2010, ApJ, 721, 856

    Wu, Y .-J., Lin, M.-Y ., Chou, S.-L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 856

  63. [71]

    D., Engrand, C., et al

    Yabuta, H., Cody, G. D., Engrand, C., et al. 2023, Science, 379, abn9057

  64. [72]

    I., & Tokunaga, A

    Zhou, L., Kaiser, R. I., & Tokunaga, A. T. 2009, Planet. Space Sci., 57, 830

  65. [73]

    I., et al

    Zhou, L., Zheng, W., Kaiser, R. I., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1243 Article number, page 10 of 12 G. Fedoseev et al.: Production of linear alkanes by solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes Appendix A: QMS-TPD spectra subtraction Figures A.1, A.2, and A.3 show the resul...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.