Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Properties of the one-component Coulomb gas on a sphere with two macroscopic external charges

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes the exact equilibrium measure and leading electrostatic energy of the one-component Coulomb gas on a sphere in the pre-critical phase, where the two external-charge caps overlap.

desk verdict Solid exact solution of the pre-critical droplet for the two-charge spherical Coulomb gas; the main caveat is the imported rational-form assumption for the droplet boundary and the heavy use of computer algebra, both addressable. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05061 v1 pith:EYQIXADQ submitted 2025-01-09 math-ph math.CVmath.MPmath.PR

Sung-Soo Byun , Peter J. Forrester , Sampad Lahiry This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.CVmath.MPmath.PR MSC 31A1560B2082B0530C20
keywords one-componentCoulombgassphericalensembleequilibriummeasureconformalmappre-criticalphaseelectrostaticenergyJacobiunitarydualityidentity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the one-component Coulomb gas on a sphere: $N$ mobile unit charges repel logarithmically in the presence of two fixed charges of strengths $Q_0 N$ and $Q_1 N$. When the spherical caps naturally associated with the fixed charges overlap, earlier post-critical formulas cease to apply; this paper determines the equilibrium measure in that pre-critical phase. It asserts that the droplet boundary is the image of the unit circle under the rational conformal map $\zeta(u)=\frac{R}{u}\frac{1-bu}{1-au}$, with all parameters fixed by the smallest positive root of a quartic, and derives the exact leading-order electrostatic energy. The payoff is that the exact free energy of the Coulomb gas is now known on both sides of the phase transition, and for $\beta=2$ the partition function connects to a Jacobi unitary ensemble gap probability via a duality identity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rational conformal map $\zeta(u)$ from the unit disk to the exterior of the droplet, whose form (2.46) is imported from the classification results [23,25]. The derivation runs through the Stieltjes transform representation (2.48): requiring that the interior pole $v_0$ of the first term satisfies $\zeta(v_0)=w$ and that its residue cancels the pole of the charge term yields (2.55)-(2.57), reducing everything to the quartic (2.63). The energy computation is carried by two explicit contour-integral evaluations: Proposition 2.8 deforms a logarithmic contour around the branch point $v_0$ to compute $\int_{\tilde\Omega_d}\log(1+|z|^2)\mu(z)\,d^2z$, and Proposition 2.9 integrates the Stieltjes transform (2.100) to compute the logarithmic potential $W(Z)$. For the partition function at $\beta=2$, the load-bearing identity is the duality (3.7)/(3.11), which equates the spherical Coulomb-gas configuration integral with a gap probability of the Jacobi unitary ensemble; the Wachter density (3.13) and its constrained analogue (4.6) then deliver the post-critical, critical, and pre-critical asymptotics.

What would settle it

Numerically minimise the energy functional (1.10) for parameter triples $(Q_0,Q_1,w)$ in the overlapping regime, compare the boundary of the minimiser with the curve $\zeta(e^{i\theta})$ obtained by solving (2.63) and using (2.54)-(2.60), and check the energy formula (2.89) by independent quadrature; any systematic discrepancy would falsify the claimed equilibrium measure and energy. Alternatively, compute both sides of the identity (4.10) numerically for several triples: the left side uses the droplet energies, the right side uses the explicit rate function (4.8).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the pre-critical phase, specified by $w>w_{\rm cri}$ in (2.74), the equilibrium measure is supported on the droplet whose boundary is the image of $|u|=1$ under $\zeta(u)=\frac{R}{u}\frac{1-bu}{1-au}$, with $0<a<b$, $a=R\alpha$, $b=\beta/R$, $\beta=(1+Q_1)\alpha/Q_0$, and $R^2$ given by (2.56). The parameter $\alpha$ is the smallest positive root of the quartic (2.63), selected by its large-$w$ behaviour. The authors fix these parameters by imposing pole and residue cancellation in the Stieltjes transform representation (2.48), and they evaluate the background, one-body, and two-body energies to obtain the closed-form pre-critical Boltzmann constant $K_{\rm pre}^N$ via (2.89), (2.90), and (2.101). At the phase boundary the pre-critical energy matches the post-critical value (1.5). For $\beta=2$, the duality identity (3.7) yields the large-$N$ expansion (1.8) in the post-critical phase, the soft-edge Painlev\'e II correction (3.21) in the critical scaling window, and, in the pre-critical phase, the electrostatic-energy identity (4.10).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the droplet boundary has the rational conformal-map form (2.46) imported from [23,25]; if the true equilibrium measure in the overlapping-caps phase is not of that form, the parameter equations (2.55)-(2.63) would not describe it, and the reduction to the quartic relies on computer algebra rather than a fully human-verifiable derivation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The pre-critical droplet is exactly determined for general $Q_0\neq Q_1$, extending the equal-charge ellipse result, and it reproduces the centred disk of radius $1/\sqrt{Q_0+Q_1}$ as $w\to\infty$.
  • The closed-form $K_{\rm pre}^N$ gives the leading $N^2$ free energy in the overlapping-caps phase, matching the post-critical constant at the phase boundary.
  • For $\beta=2$, the post-critical partition function is independent of the charge position $w$ to all inverse powers of $N$, while the critical window adds $E_2^{\rm soft}(0;(Q_0^{-2/3}s,\infty))$.
  • In the pre-critical phase the duality identity forces (4.10), equating the difference of sphere-system energies with the constrained Jacobi large-deviation rate function.
  • The identity (4.10) lets the leading pre-critical gap probability of the Jacobi unitary ensemble be read off from the sphere droplet energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the quartic-root parameterization should be verifiable by direct numerical minimisation of the energy functional (1.10); agreement of the support boundary would confirm the imported classification input.
  • Beyond the paper: the explicit formula for $K_{\rm pre}^N$ is a natural anchor for computing subleading $1/N$ corrections in the pre-critical phase, which the paper defers.
  • Beyond the paper: the Appendix C comparison suggests the same energy formulas may transfer to truncated-unitary and Poincar\'e-disk Coulomb systems, where a pre-critical energy identity of similar shape should hold.
  • Beyond the paper: the contour-integral technique for $W(Z)$ may extend to three or more external charges once the corresponding rational conformal-map classification is available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the one-component Coulomb gas on the sphere with N mobile unit charges and two macroscopic external charges of strengths Q0N and Q1N. In the post-critical phase, when the two associated spherical caps do not overlap, the equilibrium measure and free energy are already known, and the paper relies on those results. The main new contribution is the pre-critical (overlapping-caps) phase: the droplet boundary is represented by the conformal map ζ(u) = R/u (1-bu)/(1-au), with the parameters R, a, b expressed through the smallest positive root α of the quartic (2.63), and the leading-order electrostatic energy is evaluated in closed form as K_pre^N in (2.89) via Propositions 2.8 and 2.9. The paper also uses a random-matrix duality to prove the post-critical expansion of Proposition 1.1, to compute the critical scaling regime of Corollary 3.1, and to derive an identity, (4.10), between the pre-critical energy difference and a constrained Jacobi unitary ensemble rate function. The derivation contains explicit cross-checks against known limits: the equal-charge ellipse of §2.2, the large-w disk limit (2.75), the phase-boundary equality (2.108), and the Ginibre limit of Remark 2.4.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the paper supplies the exact equilibrium measure and the exact leading-order electrostatic energy for a nontrivial two-charge phase transition on the sphere, including a parameter-free conformal-map description and closed-form energy integrals. The manuscript has several concrete strengths: explicit formulas throughout, consistency with the known Q0=Q1 ellipse (Proposition 2.6 and Corollary 2.1), agreement in the large-w limit (2.75) and in the Q0→∞ planar Ginibre limit, the phase-boundary matching (2.108), and numerical support in Figures 1, 3, and 5. However, the central ansatz (2.46) is imported from the classification results in [23,25] rather than derived for the two-charge spherical potential, and the root selection for the quartic (2.63) is only justified through computer algebra, with Appendix B containing an internally inconsistent sentence. These issues make the significance conditional: the paper is likely correct in its main claims, but the load-bearing classification and root-selection steps need to be made verifiable before the results can be accepted as established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (2.46)] The rational-form ansatz for the droplet boundary is the load-bearing assumption of the paper. The manuscript states that (2.46) follows from [23, Eq. (27) with N=1] and [25, Th. 5], and it uses [25, Lemma 2] to write the Stieltjes transform (2.48); however, it does not verify that the hypotheses of these classification theorems hold for the general Q0 ≠ Q1 two-charge spherical field. The checks for Q0=Q1 (§2.2, Proposition 2.6, Corollary 2.1) and for the Q0→∞ Ginibre limit (Remark 2.4) are strong consistency tests, but they do not exclude the possibility that the true support for generic Q0, Q1, w lies outside this rational family. Because equations (2.55)–(2.63) and the energy (2.89) are all derived from (2.46), this gap is directly load-bearing for the central claim. I recommend adding either a verification that the [23,25] classification applies in this setting, an independent derivation of the two-pole/one-zero form from the equilibrium equation (2.9), or a numerical check that the predicted boundary satisfies (2.9) for a representative non-symmetric parameter set.
  2. [§2.3 and Appendix B] The reduction of the residue-matching equation (2.61) to the quartic (2.63) and the subsequent root counting are delegated to computer algebra, and Appendix B contains a contradictory sentence: after arguing that h(x) has one negative root and that the remaining two roots form a complex conjugate pair, it concludes that “roots of h are all positive.” The needed conclusion is the opposite—that h has no positive roots, so Disc_α(p) ≠ 0 and all roots of p are real and distinct. As written, Appendix B does not support the “smallest positive root” selection in Proposition 2.7, and the large-w expansion (2.72) alone does not identify the root unless the non-crossing property and the positivity of the other root are established. I recommend replacing the CAS-only statements with an explicit discriminant computation or a corrected, self-consistent argument, and stating precisely which criterion selects α.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Remark 2.4.2] The sentence “which justifies (2.4) by continuity of a, b with respect to w” appears to refer to the inequality 0 < a < b stated in (2.47), not to equation (2.4); the cross-reference should be corrected.
  2. [Appendix B] In addition to the substantive issue raised above, the sentence “Thus we have the required result that roots of h are all positive” is a typographical inversion of the required statement, and it should be rewritten to say that h has no positive roots.
  3. [§1.3] The phrase “determinisation of the electrostatic energy” should read “determination of the electrostatic energy.”
  4. [§3.4] The notation α(Q1, Q2) in the text before equation (3.18) is inconsistent with the definition α(Q0, Q1) in (3.20) and should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pre-critical droplet parameters are solved from equilibrium conditions, and the only self-citation (the RMT duality) is not load-bearing for the main derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—the pre-critical droplet boundary and the leading electrostatic energy K_pre^N—are derived by solving the equilibrium conditions, not by fitting the target answers. The conformal map form (2.46) is imported from the external classification results [23,25] and is not re-derived; this is a load-bearing assumption and therefore a correctness risk if the classification hypotheses fail, but it is not circularity because the paper does not define the droplet in terms of its own conclusions. The parameters R, a, b, v0 are fixed by ζ(v0)=w (2.49), the normalization condition (2.58), and residue matching (2.57), leading to the quartic (2.63); α is selected as the smallest positive root with the large-w expansion (2.72), an identification justified by consistency with Q0=Q1 and the planar Ginibre limit, not by the energy result. The energy (2.89) is then computed from the solved map via Propositions 2.8 and 2.9, with independent checks at the phase boundary (2.108) and large w (2.109). The only self-citation is [29] (Forrester's duality identity), used for the RMT partition-function expansion (Proposition 1.1) and the comparative energy identity (4.10); the equilibrium-measure and K_pre^N derivation does not depend on it, so this is not load-bearing for the central claim. Two non-circular weaknesses are noted: the Appendix B root-count proof is delegated to computer algebra and contains the internally contradictory sentence 'roots of h are all positive' after stating that the other two roots are complex, and the validity of the rational-map classification [23,25] for the asymmetric two-charge field is not re-verified. These are proof/completeness gaps, not circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the imported conformal-map classification [23,25], the self-cited RMT duality [29], and standard potential theory, plus several computer-algebra reductions that are asserted rather than displayed. No new physical entities or fitted constants are introduced; Q0, Q1 and w are model inputs, and the conformal parameters are solved from equilibrium conditions.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the equilibrium measure for the two-charge spherical Coulomb gas
    Invoked in Section 2.2 with citation [39]; taken from prior potential-theory work, not re-derived.
  • domain assumption The droplet boundary is the image of the unit circle under zeta(u)=R/u(1-bu)/(1-au) with 0<a<b, and the Stieltjes transform has the form (2.48)
    Classification from [23,25] imported without proof; underpins the entire parameter determination in Section 2.3.
  • domain assumption Duality identity (3.4) for the spherical unitary ensemble
    Cited to [29], a preprint by one of the authors (Forrester); used for Proposition 1.1 and the energy identity (4.10), with no proof included in this paper.
  • domain assumption Wachter density (3.13) and the constrained Jacobi large-deviation rate function S from [44]
    Used in Section 4.2 to evaluate the Jacobi gap probability; results imported from the cited literature.
  • standard math Standard potential theory characterization of droplet equilibrium via constant potential equation (1.9)
    Basis for the droplet equation throughout Section 2; standard textbook material (Saff-Totik).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Properties of the one-component Coulomb gas on a sphere with two macroscopic external charges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EYQIXADQ

@misc{pith2026250105061,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Properties of the one-component Coulomb gas on a sphere with two macroscopic external charges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EYQIXADQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05061}
}
abstract

The one-component Coulomb gas on the sphere, consisting on $N$ unit charges interacting via a logarithmic potential, and in the presence of two external charges each of strength proportional to $N$, is considered. There are two spherical caps naturally associated with the external charges, giving rise to two distinct phases depending on them not overlapping (post-critical) or overlapping (pre-critical). The equilibrium measure in the post-critical phase is known from earlier work. We determine the equilibrium measure in the pre-critical phase using a particular conformal map, with the parameters therein specified in terms of a root of a certain fourth order polynomial. This is used to determine the exact form of the electrostatic energy for the pre-critical phase. Using a duality relation from random matrix theory, the partition function for the Coulomb gas at the inverse temperature $\beta = 2$ can be expanded for large $N$ in the post-critical phase, and in a scaling region of the post and pre-critical boundary. For the pre-critical phase, the duality identity implies a relation between two electrostatic energies, one for the present sphere system, and the other for a certain constrained log-gas relating to the Jacobi unitary ensemble.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05061 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Plots (a)–(e) show the droplet boundary for the case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The plot illustrates the conformal mappings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The graph shows the energy w 7→ 1 N2 log K post N when the condition (2.66) is violated, and the energy w 7→ 1 N2 log K pre N when (2.66) holds. Here, plot (a) illustrates the case with symmetric charges, where Q0 = Q1 = 4, while plot (b) illustrates the case with asymmetric charges, where Q0 = 4 and Q1 = 2. The vertical lines indicate the critical point (2.74). The two graphs (a) and (b) have a similar shape, but a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The plot (a) illustrates the Wachter distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The blue dots represent w 7→ 2 Q2 1 (K post N − K pre N ), where Q0 = 4, Q1 = 2. The solid red curve shows the RHS of (4.10), with γ1 = 1, γ2 = 1/2 as specified. The vertical line marks the critical transition point defined in (2.74). In the left figure, where w ranges…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymptotics of the real eigenvalue distribution for the real spherical ensemble

    math-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For the real spherical ensemble, asymptotic formulas are derived for the probability of M real eigenvalues when M ~ N, M ~ sqrt(N), and M near the mean, with cross-regime matching and the leading p_{N,0} ~ e^{-sqrt(pi...

  2. Partition function of 2D Coulomb gases with radially symmetric potentials and a hard wall

    math.PR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For radially symmetric potentials at beta = 2, the log N coefficient in the hard-wall partition function is -1/4 for an annulus and -1/3 for a disk when the wall lies strictly inside the droplet, instead of the usual -1/12.

  3. Moments of characteristic polynomials for classical $\beta$ ensembles

    math-ph 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even-power characteristic polynomial moments for Gaussian, Laguerre, and Jacobi beta ensembles are shown to have large-N expansions with explicit error bounds, a universal Barnes-G constant, and new formulas for weigh...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [29]

    Forrester,Dualities in random matrix theory, preprint

    P.J. Forrester,Dualities in random matrix theory, preprint

    work page

  2. [1]

    Adhikari,Hole probabilities forβ-ensembles and determinantal point processes in the complex plane, Electron

    K. Adhikari,Hole probabilities forβ-ensembles and determinantal point processes in the complex plane, Electron. J. Probab.23 (2018), Paper No. 48, 21 pp

    work page 2018

  3. [2]

    Adhikari and N.K

    K. Adhikari and N.K. Reddy,Hole probabilities for finite and infinite Ginibre ensembles, Int. Math. Res. Not.2017 (2017), 6694–6730

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    Akemann, S.-S

    G. Akemann, S.-S. Byun and N.-G. Kang, A non-Hermitian generalisation of the Marchenko–Pastur distribution: from the circular law to multi-criticality, Ann. Henri Poincaré 22 (2021), 1035–1068

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    Ameur, C

    Y. Ameur, C. Charlier and J. Cronvall,Free energy and fluctuations in the random normal matrix model with spectral gaps, arXiv:2312.13904

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Ameur, N-G

    Y. Ameur, N-G. Kang and S.-M. Seo,The random normal matrix model: insertion of a point charge, Potential Anal.58 (2023), 331–372

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Balogh, M

    F. Balogh, M. Bertola, S.-Y. Lee and K.D.T.-R. McLaughlin,Strong asymptotics of the orthogonal polynomials with respect to a measure supported on the plane, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015), 112–172. 35

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Balogh and M

    F. Balogh and M. Merzi,Equilibrium measures for a class of potentials with discrete rotational symmetries, Constr. Approx.42 (2015), 399–424

    work page 2015

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Benaych-Georges and F

    F. Benaych-Georges and F. Chapon,Random right eigenvalues of Gaussian quaternionic matrices, Random Matrices Theory Appl.1 (2012), 1150009

    2012

  2. [9]

    Brauchart, P.D

    J.S. Brauchart, P.D. Dragnev, E.B. Saff and R.S. Womersley,Logarithmic and Riesz equilib- rium for multiple sources on the sphere: the exceptional case, Contemporary Computational Mathematics - A Celebration of the 80th Birthday of Ian Sloan (J. Dick, F. Kuo, and H. Woźniakows...

    2018

  3. [10]

    Byun,Planar equilibrium measure problem in the quadratic fields with a point charge, Comput

    S.-S. Byun,Planar equilibrium measure problem in the quadratic fields with a point charge, Comput. Methods Funct. Theory24 (2024), 303–332

    2024

  4. [11]

    S.-S. Byun, C. Charlier, P. Moreillon and N. Simm,Planar equilibrium measure for the truncated ensembles with a point charge, manuscript in progress

  5. [12]

    S.-S. Byun, C. Charlier, P. Moreillon and N. Simm,Duality in random matrix theory, Coulomb gases and last passage percolation, manuscript in progress

  6. [13]

    Byun and P.J

    S.-S. Byun and P.J. Forrester,Spherical induced ensembles with symplectic symmetry, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 19 (2023), 033, 28pp

    2023

  7. [14]

    Byun and P.J

    S.-S. Byun and P.J. Forrester,Progress on the study of the Ginibre ensembles, KIAS Springer Series in Mathematics3, Springer, 2024

    2024

  8. [15]

    Byun, N.-G

    S.-S. Byun, N.-G. Kang and S.-M. Seo,Partition functions of determinantal and Pfaffian Coulomb gases with radially symmetric potentials, Comm. Math. Phys.401 (2023), 1627– 1663

    2023

  9. [16]

    Byun and S

    S.-S. Byun and S. Park,Large gap probabilities of complex and symplectic spherical ensembles with point charges, arXiv:2405.00386

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Byun, S.-M

    S.-S. Byun, S.-M. Seo, and M. Yang,Free energy expansions of a conditional GinUE and large deviations of the smallest eigenvalue of the LUE, arXiv:2402.18983

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    Charlier, Hole probabilities and balayage of measures for planar Coulomb gases , arXiv:2311.15285

    C. Charlier, Hole probabilities and balayage of measures for planar Coulomb gases , arXiv:2311.15285

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    Charlier and R

    C. Charlier and R. Gharakhloo,Asymptotics of Hankel determinants with a Laguerre-type or Jacobi-type potential and Fisher–Hartwig singularitiesAdv. Math. 383 (2021), 107672

    2021

  13. [20]

    Collins,Product of random projections, Jacobi ensembles and universality problems arising from free probability, Probab

    B. Collins,Product of random projections, Jacobi ensembles and universality problems arising from free probability, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields133 (2005), 315–344

    2005

  14. [21]

    Criado del Rey and A.B.J

    J.G. Criado del Rey and A.B.J. Kuijlaars,An equilibrium problem on the sphere with two equal charges, preprint arXiv:1907.0480

    1907

  15. [22]

    Criado del Rey and A.B.J

    J.G. Criado del Rey and A.B.J. Kuijlaars,A vector equilibrium problem for symmetrically located point charges on a sphere, Constr. Approx.55 (2022), 775–827

    2022

  16. [23]

    Crowdy and M

    D. Crowdy and M. Cloke,Analytical solutions for distributed multipolar vortex equilibria on a sphere, Physics of Fluids,15 (2003), 22–34. 36

    2003

  17. [24]

    Deaño and N

    A. Deaño and N. Simm,Characteristic polynomials of complex random matrices and Painlevé transcendents, Int. Math. Res. Not.,2022 (2022), 210–264

    2022

  18. [25]

    Etingof and X

    P. Etingof and X. Ma,Density of eigenvalues of random normal matrices with an arbitrary potential, and of generalized normal matrices, SIGMA 3 (2007), 048

    2007

  19. [26]

    Fischmann and P.J

    J. Fischmann and P.J. Forrester,One-component plasma on a spherical annulus and a random matrix ensemble, J. Stat. Mech.2011 (2011), P10003

    2011

  20. [27]

    Forrester,Log-gases and random matrices, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    P.J. Forrester,Log-gases and random matrices, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    2010

  21. [28]

    Forrester,Large deviation eigenvalue density for the soft edge Laguerre and Jacobi β-ensembles, J

    P.J. Forrester,Large deviation eigenvalue density for the soft edge Laguerre and Jacobi β-ensembles, J. Phys. A45 (2012), 145201

    2012

  22. [30]

    Forrester and M

    P.J. Forrester and M. Krishnapur,Derivation of an eigenvalue probability density function relating to the Poincaré disk, J. Phys. A42 (2009), 385204

    2009

  23. [31]

    Forrester and E.M

    P.J. Forrester and E.M. Rains,Matrix averages relating to the Ginibre ensemble, J. Phys. A 42 (2009), 385205

    2009

  24. [32]

    Forrester and N.S

    P.J. Forrester and N.S. Witte,Painlevé II in random matrix theory and related fields, Constr. Approx. 41 (2015), 589–613

    2015

  25. [33]

    Gustafsson and V.G

    B. Gustafsson and V.G. Tkachev,On the exponential transform of lemniscates, Comp. Methods Function Theory11 (2011), 591–615

    2011

  26. [34]

    Holcomb and G.R.M

    D. Holcomb and G.R.M. Flores,Edge Scaling of theβ-Jacobi ensemble, J. Stat. Phys.149 (2012), 1136–1160

    2012

  27. [35]

    Jancovici and G

    B. Jancovici and G. Téllez,Two-dimensional Coulomb systems on a surface of constant negative curvature, J. Stat. Phys.91 (1998), 953–977

    1998

  28. [36]

    Kieburg, A.B.J

    M. Kieburg, A.B.J. Kuijlaars and S. Lahiry,Orthogonal polynomials in the normal matrix model with two insertions, arXiv:2408.12952

  29. [37]

    Krüger, S.-Y

    T. Krüger, S.-Y. Lee and M. Yang,Local statistics in normal matrix models with merging singularity, arXiv:2306.12263

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lee and M

    S.-Y. Lee and M. Yang,Strong asymptotics of planar orthogonal polynomials: Gaussian weight perturbed by finite number of point charges, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.76 (2023), 2888–2956

    2023

  31. [39]

    Legg and P.D

    A.R. Legg and P.D. Dragnev,Logarithmic equilibrium on the sphere in the presence of multiple point charges, Constr. Approx.,54 (2021), 237–257

    2021

  32. [40]

    S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr,Top eigenvalue of a random matrix: Large deviations and third order phase transition, J. Stat. Mech.2014 (2014), P01012

    2014

  33. [41]

    Mays,A real quaternion spherical ensemble of random matrices, J

    A. Mays,A real quaternion spherical ensemble of random matrices, J. Stat. Phys.153 (2013), 48–69. 37

    2013

  34. [42]

    Mays and A

    A. Mays and A. Ponsaing,An induced real quaternion spherical ensemble of random matrices, Random Matrices Theory Appl.6 (2017), 1750001

    2017

  35. [43]

    D. S. Moak, E. B. Saff and R. S. Varga,On the zeros of Jacobi polynomialsP (αn,βn) n (x), Trans. Am. Math. Soc.249 (1979), 159–162

    1979

  36. [44]

    Ramli, E

    H.M. Ramli, E. Katzav and I.P. Castillo,Spectral properties of the Jacobi ensembles via the Coulomb gas approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45 (2012), 465005

    2012

  37. [45]

    Richardson,Hele-Shaw flows with a free boundary produced by the injection of fluid into a narrow channel, J

    S. Richardson,Hele-Shaw flows with a free boundary produced by the injection of fluid into a narrow channel, J. Fluid Mech.,56 (1972), 609–618

    1972

  38. [46]

    Saff and V

    E.B. Saff and V. Totik ,Logarithmic potentials with external fields, Grundlehren der Math- ematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], Vol. 316, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997, appendix B by Thomas Bloom

    1997

  39. [47]

    Serebryakov,Multi-point correlators in non-Hermitian matrices and beyond, Ph.D

    A. Serebryakov,Multi-point correlators in non-Hermitian matrices and beyond, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sussex, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Serebryakov, N

    A. Serebryakov, N. Simm, and G. Dubach,Characteristic polynomials of random truncations: Mo- ments, duality and asymptotics, Random Matrices: Theory and Applications,12 (2023), 2250049

    2023

  41. [49]

    Serebryakov and N

    A. Serebryakov and N. Simm,Schur function expansion in non-Hermitian ensembles and averages of characteristic polynomials, Ann. Henri Poincaré (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-024-01483-6

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    Serfaty,Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz gases, arXiv:2407.21194

    S. Serfaty,Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz gases, arXiv:2407.21194

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Tracy and H

    C.A. Tracy and H. Widom,Level-spacing distributions and the Airy kernel, Commun. Math. Phys. 159 (1994), 151–174

    1994

  44. [52]

    Wachter,The strong limits of random matrix spectra for sample matrices of independent elements, Annal

    K.W. Wachter,The strong limits of random matrix spectra for sample matrices of independent elements, Annal. Prob.6 (1978), 1–18

    1978

  45. [53]

    Webb and M.D

    C. Webb and M.D. Wong,On the moments of the characteristic polynomial of a Ginibre random matrix, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.,118 (2019), 1017–1056

    2019

  46. [54]

    Zyczkowski and H.-J

    K. Zyczkowski and H.-J. Sommers,Truncations of random unitary matrices, J. Phys. A33 (2000), 2045–2057. 38

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.