Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 16 cited by

Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read First reactor-born neutrino-nucleus scattering seen at 3.7 sigma

desk verdict First reactor CEvNS claim at 3.7σ, carefully analyzed but with a background-model asterisk; deserves serious refereeing, not yet a discovery. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05206 v3 pith:TUJS4KQI submitted 2025-01-09 hep-ex

N.Ackermann , H.Bonet , A.Bonhomme , C.Buck , K.Fülber , J.Hakenmüller , J.Hempfling , G.Heusser
show 10 more authors
M.Lindner W.Maneschg K.Ni M.Rank T.Rink E.Sánchez Garc{i}a I.Stalder H.Strecker R.Wink J.Woenckhaus
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords coherentelasticneutrino-nucleusscatteringreactorantineutrinosgermaniumdetectorslow-energythresholdStandardModeltestmonitoring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first observation of coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering at a nuclear reactor. Using three high-purity germanium detectors 20.7 meters from the 3.6 GW Leibstadt reactor core, the experiment found an excess of 395 ± 106 events over reactor-on background in 327 kg·days of data, with a statistical significance of 3.7 sigma. This matches the Standard Model expectation of 347 ± 59 events. The result matters because it confirms the coherent neutrino-nucleus interaction at low energies and shows that kilogram-scale detectors can see reactor antineutrinos, with implications for reactor monitoring and for searches for physics beyond the Standard Model.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering: a reactor antineutrino exchanges a Z boson with the germanium nucleus as a whole, producing a nuclear recoil of tens of eV whose ionization signal is registered by high-purity germanium diodes with thresholds near 160 eVee. The interaction rate is enhanced by the square of the neutron number, which allows a total active mass of 2.83 kg to see roughly 350 predicted events in 327 kg·days. The analysis is carried by a profile likelihood fit that models reactor-on and reactor-off data simultaneously, with the background spectrum anchored by a validated Monte Carlo decomposition and the signal prediction fixed by an independently measured ionization-quenching factor and a data-driven reactor antineutrino spectrum.

What would settle it

Take reactor data at zero thermal power with the drywell head positioned exactly as during reactor operation; if the 160 to 800 eVee spectrum still shows an excess matching the reactor-on shape after the overburden corrections, an unmodeled background is mimicking the signal. A mismatch between the fitted low-energy shape and the predicted CEνNS recoil spectrum as the energy threshold is lowered would also falsify the signal attribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In an energy window from 160 to 800 eVee, the combined fit of three detectors during reactor operation yields 395 ± 106 coherent elastic scattering events, compared with a prediction of 347 ± 59 based on the Standard Model cross-section and the reactor's measured thermal power and fission fractions. The excess rises steeply toward low energy, as expected for nuclear recoils from reactor antineutrinos, and is absent in the reactor-off spectrum after accounting for the extra steel overburden of the drywell head and the reduced radon level. The paper concludes that the CONUS+ experiment has observed reactor-based coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, confirming the Standard Model in a regime where the coherent cross-section is not suppressed by nuclear-structure effects.

Load-bearing premise

The outcome depends on the assumption that no reactor-correlated background, such as core-produced neutrons or gammas, adds counts in the 160 to 800 eVee window with the same low-energy shape as the neutrino signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The measured rate agrees with the Standard Model CEνNS cross-section, anchoring the coherent cross-section at sub-10 MeV antineutrino energies.
  • The result rules out the enhanced low-energy quenching claimed by some earlier measurements and favors the standard quenching model as the description of the observed low-energy excess.
  • Combining this germanium result with accelerator-based germanium target measurements can, in principle, constrain nuclear form factors in neutrino scattering.
  • Future runs with larger, lower-threshold detectors will measure the CEνNS cross-section more precisely and open sensitivity to new mediators, neutrino electromagnetic properties, and the weak mixing angle at low energy.
  • The technique offers a path to reactor monitoring and safeguards with small, mobile detectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 3.7 sigma excess persists with additional exposure, a natural next test is whether the event rate tracks the reactor's thermal power and fission-fraction evolution across the fuel cycle, which would separate CEνNS from any slowly varying background.
  • Lowering the energy threshold would add sensitivity to antineutrinos below 5 MeV, where the reactor flux rises steeply, potentially turning the current observation into a precision cross-section measurement.
  • A joint fit of this reactor result with solar-neutrino CEνNS signals in dark matter detectors could expose nuclear-structure corrections at different momentum transfers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The CONUS+ collaboration reports an excess of 395 ± 106 events in the reactor-on energy spectrum of three germanium detectors at the Leibstadt nuclear power plant, which they attribute to coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS). A profile likelihood fit with systematic pull terms yields a statistical significance of 3.7σ for this excess, compared with a Standard Model prediction of 347 ± 59 events. The paper presents this as the first observation of reactor CEvNS and uses the data to argue for the Lindhard quenching model over alternative descriptions. The analysis includes two independent likelihood implementations, a detailed GEANT4-based background decomposition, and a careful propagation of systematic uncertainties.

Significance. If confirmed, this result would constitute the first detection of CEvNS at a nuclear reactor and would validate the Standard Model cross-section at sub-10 MeV neutrino energies, where fully coherent scattering dominates. The paper's strengths include the cross-checked likelihood implementations, the explicit treatment of detector-specific thresholds and dead times, and the decomposition of the background into cosmogenic, radon, and other components. However, the 3.7σ significance is below the conventional 5σ discovery threshold, and the central claim rests on the assumption that reactor-correlated backgrounds, particularly reactor neutrons, are negligible without a direct in-situ constraint. These issues make the 'observation' claim premature as currently presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model differences in reactor off data; Eq. (4)] The claim that reactor-correlated neutrons and high-energy gammas are negligible in the region of interest is based on the simulation study in ref. [30], not on a data-driven constraint during reactor-on operation. The likelihood in Eq. (4) contains no free parameter for a reactor-power-correlated background component, and the 60 kg d reactor-off exposure cannot constrain backgrounds that vanish when the reactor is off. Because neutron-induced nuclear recoils in germanium have a low-energy ionization spectrum similar to CEvNS, an unmodeled reactor-neutron component could in principle mimic the reported 3.7σ excess. Please provide a direct test of this scenario: for example, a neutron monitor during reactor-on, a constraint from a high-energy gamma line such as 16N, or a conservative nuisance parameter in the fit that allows for a power-correlated background. Without such a test, the central claim is not fully established.
  2. [Abstract and title] The paper claims 'direct observation' of CEvNS with a significance of 3.7σ. In particle physics, the standard discovery threshold is 5σ; a 3.7σ excess is typically called 'evidence' or 'indication'. The title and abstract should be adjusted to match the statistical strength of the result, or the analysis should be extended to reach a higher significance before the observation claim is made.
  3. [Quenching; Extended Data Fig. 9] The signal prediction uses the Lindhard quenching parameter k = 0.162 from ref. [34], which is the collaboration's own prior measurement, and the same dataset is then used to argue that Lindhard is preferred over the alternative quenching models of ref. [33]. Although likelihood A includes a fourth-order polynomial to vary the signal shape, the final comparison of quenching models (Extended Data Fig. 9) still relies on the assumption that the signal shape is well described by the Lindhard form. This creates a degree of circularity. Please clarify how the polynomial shape variation breaks this circularity, or present a quenching-agnostic signal extraction to support the quenching-model comparison.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The experiment name is written inconsistently as 'CONUS+' and 'Conus+'; please standardize to one form (e.g., CONUS+).
  2. [Abstract] 'semi-conductor' should be 'semiconductor'.
  3. [Table 1] The column heading 'data data/SM prediction' is confusing; the first 'data' appears redundant and should be removed or clarified.
  4. [Supplemental material, Likelihood fit and systematics treatment] The sentence 'The likelihood fit itself gives a result of (395 ± 86) CEνNS counts' should explicitly state that this uncertainty is statistical only, to avoid confusion with the final total uncertainty of ±106 quoted elsewhere.
  5. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption 'Deviations from a purely linear energy scale measured...' should be rephrased to 'Deviations from a purely linear energy scale, measured with a pulse generator for the three CONUS+ detectors' for clarity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Mild self-consistency loop in the quenching validation, but the observed 3.7 sigma excess is an independently visible data-minus-background excess and is not forced by the fit.

  1. self definitional [Supplemental material, 'Quenching' and 'Impact and outlook'; likelihood model Eq. (4)]
    "In the Conus+ analysis, the energy dependent signal quenching is described by the Lindhard model [32] with a quenching parameter k = (0.162±0.004) as determined in [34]. ... Moreover, the detected rate is in very good agreement with the predicted Ge quenching using the Lindhard theory with a quenching parameter as measured in [34]. The deviations from Lindhard theory claimed in [33] ... are both ruled out by this result."

    The signal template ns_i in Eq. (4) is built using the Lindhard model with k=0.162 from the collaboration's own [34]. The likelihood fit extracts the CEνNS amplitude s with that template, so the 'measured' rate and the 'predicted' rate share the same quenching input. The statement that the measured rate agrees with the Lindhard prediction using [34], and that [33] is ruled out, is therefore partly a self-consistency check rather than an independent validation of k. The alternative-quenching comparison in Extended Data Fig. 9 uses the background-subtracted excess and is not circular, which limits the impact of this loop.

full rationale

The central claim of a 3.7σ reactor-on excess is obtained from a profile likelihood in which the neutrino amplitude s is a free parameter; it is not obtained by plugging the SM prediction into the data. The background model is normalized using line rates and a dedicated pre-installation campaign [30], not by fitting the neutrino signal region, and the reactor-off data plus the residual on-off comparison provide a partially independent handle. The main self-citation chain ([29], [30], [34]) supplies background and quenching inputs from prior collaboration measurements, but those are external to this paper's fitted values and are not machine-checked reasons to call the observation forced. The only genuine circular element is the use of the same measured quenching parameter k in both the signal template and the prediction that is then said to validate that parameter; this affects the secondary quenching-model claim, not the existence of the low-energy excess. The excess is displayed in Fig. 3 as a direct data-minus-background rise, so the observation has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Standard Model cross-section, a reactor flux model, the Lindhard quenching model with a measured k value, and the completeness of the Monte Carlo background model. Several background components are scaled to match the data, and the detector thresholds are analysis choices. No new particles or mediators are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • background scaling factor b = pulled to 1 (fitted)
    Eq. (4): muON = ... + b * nb_i..., with b an additional fit parameter for the overall background normalization.
  • leakage test component parameters = not quoted
    For detectors C2 and C3, modeled using a function with two parameters as in [27]; impact below 10% in the 0.4-1 keVee region.
  • muon veto inefficiency polynomial coefficients = not quoted
    Below 2 keVee the muon-veto inefficiency is modeled with a polynomial, dropping to 97% efficiency below 0.4 keVee.
  • radon background scalings = 1.9-2.8 counts d^-1 kg^-1 in 0.4-1 keVee
    Radon contributions scaled to match gamma-line count rates in the spectrum.
  • signal shape polynomial coefficients (likelihood A) = not quoted
    Cross-check likelihood A introduces a fourth order polynomial to vary the signal shape with Gaussian pull terms.
  • per-detector energy thresholds = 160 eV (C3), 170 eV (C2), 180 eV (C5)
    Chosen by hand to sit above electronic noise and microphonics; define the lower edge of the signal window.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standard Model CEνNS cross-section with Helm nuclear form factor
    Used for the signal prediction; no uncertainty is assigned to the form factor (Supplement, Likelihood fit section).
  • domain assumption Reactor antineutrino spectrum from the Daya Bay data-driven method with fission fractions
    Spectrum from [31] augmented by [46] and [47]; fission fractions for 235U, 238U, 239Pu, 241Pu; contributes 4.6% to the prediction uncertainty.
  • domain assumption Lindhard quenching model with k=0.162±0.004
    Converts nuclear recoil energy to ionization energy; the signal shape and prediction depend on this model from the collaboration's own measurement [34].
  • domain assumption Completeness of the GEANT4/MaGe background model
    Assumes all significant background components are included and correctly simulated; reactor-correlated backgrounds are taken as negligible following [30].
  • standard math Poisson likelihood with Gaussian pull terms
    Defined in Eqs. (2)-(4) for the profile likelihood ratio test.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TUJS4KQI

@misc{pith2026250105206,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino-nucleus scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TUJS4KQI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05206}
}
abstract

Neutrinos are elementary particles that interact only very weakly with matter. Neutrino experiments are, therefore, usually big, with masses in the multi-tonne range. The thresholdless interaction of coherent elastic scattering of neutrinos on atomic nuclei leads to greatly enhanced interaction rates, which allows for much smaller detectors. The study of this process gives insights into physics beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. The CONUS+ experiment was designed to first detect elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in the fully coherent regime with low-energy neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors. For this purpose, semi-conductor detectors based on high-purity germanium crystals with extremely low-energy thresholds were developed. Here we report the first observation of a neutrino signal with a statistical significance of 3.7 sigma from the CONUS+ experiment, operated at the nuclear power plant in Leibstadt, Switzerland. In 119 days of reactor operation (395$\pm$106) neutrinos were measured compared with a predicted number from calculations assuming Standard Model physics of (347$\pm$59) events. With increased precision, there is potential for fundamental discoveries in the future. The CONUS+ results in combination with other measurements of this interaction channel might therefore mark a starting point for a new era in neutrino physics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 16 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inelastic neutrino-nucleus scattering off $^{203/205}$Tl in terms of the nuclear recoil energy using a hybrid nuclear model

    nucl-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hybrid shell-model/quasiparticle-phonon calculation predicts that inelastic neutrino scattering off 203/205Tl is several times larger at high neutrino energies than earlier shell-model-only estimates, and can rival ...

  2. Radiative corrections in neutral-current (anti)neutrino elastic scattering at $\text{GeV}$ energies I: Nucleon targets

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Radiative corrections to neutral-current (anti)neutrino-nucleon elastic scattering are computed within low-energy EFT and reach a few percent, comparable to the strange-quark effects they must be disentangled from.

  3. Prospect of the NUCLEUS Experiment at Chooz for Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and New Physics Searches

    hep-ex 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Assuming the low-energy background can be eliminated, a 7-gram NUCLEUS detector at Chooz is projected to see coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering at 4.7σ in one year and to set competitive bounds on new neutrino interactions.

  4. Constraints on millicharged particles from nuclear gamma-decays

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Nuclear gamma cascades in reactors produce millicharged particle pairs, giving the strongest constraints on millicharge for masses between 0.7 and 2 MeV.

  5. Searches for heavy neutral lepton decays at spallation neutron sources

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Current and future COHERENT detectors at the SNS can set competitive limits on HNL–neutrino mixings through pion/muon DAR production and in-detector e+e− decays, with muon mixing offering the strongest near-term reach.

  6. Testing light and heavy vector mediators with solar CE$\nu$NS measurements

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combined solar CEνNS data from XENONnT, PandaX-4T, and LZ yield competitive constraints on vector NSI and light mediators and a weak mixing angle measurement at low momentum transfer.

  7. Elastic neutrino-electron scattering perspectives at nuclear reactors

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Projections show CLOUD and TAO could improve low-energy weak mixing angle measurements to 8-11% via elastic neutrino-electron scattering, with competitive magnetic moment and NSI limits.

  8. Probing Light Dark Particles in Neutrino Scattering Experiments

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dark fermion produced in neutrino scattering could be probed at DUNE's near detector up to cutoff scales near 1 TeV, beyond CHARM II and LEP, while current COHERENT/CONUS+ limits stay below LHC bounds.

  9. Testing lepton non-unitarity with the next generation of Germanium-based CE$\nu$NS reactor experiments

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A future 100-kg Germanium reactor CEνNS experiment could constrain lepton non-unitarity to 1−α11² ≈ 0.005 and, under low-scale seesaw assumptions, probe new-physics scales up to ~2.5 TeV.

  10. New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Light-mediator couplings are constrained more strongly when they attach to dark matter than to neutrinos, and the neutrinofog in xenon detectors is shifted and deformed under both scenarios.

  11. Reactor antineutrinos CE$\nu$NS on germanium: CONUS+ and TEXONO as a new gateway to SM and BSM physics

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CONUS+ and TEXONO reactor CEνNS data are consistent with the Standard Model and yield the most stringent limit on the electron neutrino millicharge through neutrino-electron scattering.

  12. Probing conventional and new physics at the ESS with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Projected ESS CEνNS measurements would improve current constraints on the weak mixing angle, nuclear neutron radii, and several new physics scenarios by large factors, and would lead in some unexplored mass ranges.

  13. Probing Standard Model and Beyond with Reactor CE$\nu$NS Data of CONUS+ experiment

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using CONUS+ reactor data, the authors constrain the weak mixing angle, neutrino electromagnetic properties, and light scalar and vector mediators, finding their most notable limit on neutrino millicharge when electro...

  14. Prospects for Exploring Non-Standard Neutrino Properties with Argon-Based CEvNS Experiments

    hep-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Argon CEvNS detectors at stopped-pion sources project sin²θW precision near 1%, neutrino magnetic-moment limits near 10⁻⁹ μB, charge-radius limits near 10⁻³² cm², and vector NSI sensitivity at the 10⁻² level.

  15. Exploring the Standard Model and Beyond from the Evidence of CE$\nu$NS with Reactor Antineutrinos in CONUS+

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fitting the CONUS+ reactor CEνNS event count yields sin²θW = 0.268 ± 0.047, µν < 5.6×10⁻¹⁰ µB, and NSI bounds similar to COHERENT, all consistent with the Standard Model.

  16. Fundamental Nuclear and Particle Physics At Neutron Sources

    nucl-ex 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A community whitepaper makes the case that ESS and neutron sources offer a competitive, complementary route to search for new physics, with proposed experiments in neutron decay, EDM, baryon number violation, neutrino...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 16 Pith papers

  1. [17]

    Colaresi, J., Collar, J.I., Hossbach, T.W., Lewis, C.M., Yocum, K.M.: Measure- ment of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineu- trinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(21), 211802 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.129.211802 arXiv:2202.09672 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [33]

    Collar, J.I., Kavner, A.R.L., Lewis, C.M.: Germanium response to sub- keV nuclear recoils: a multipronged experimental characterization. Phys. Rev. D 103(12), 122003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.122003 arXiv:2102.10089 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [30]

    : Background characterization of the CONUS+ experi- mental location

    Sanchez Garcia, E., et al. : Background characterization of the CONUS+ experi- mental location. Eur. Phys. J. C 85(4), 465 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-14160-7 arXiv:2412.13707 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [34]

    : Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range

    Bonhomme, A., et al. : Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(9), 815 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10768-1 arXiv:2202.03754 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [1]

    Freedman, D.Z.: Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current. Phys. Rev. D 9, 1389–1392 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.9.1389

    work page 1974

  6. [2]

    Science 357(6356), 1123–1126 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0990 arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex]

    Akimov, D., et al.: Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering. Science 357(6356), 1123–1126 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0990 arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [3]

    : First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon

    Akimov, D., et al. : First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(1), 012002 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.126.012002 arXiv:2003.10630 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [4]

    : Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with COHERENT’s Germanium Array

    Adamski, S., et al. : Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with COHERENT’s Germanium Array. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134(23), 231801 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.231801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.231801 2025

Show all 48 references
  1. [5]

    Science 124, 103–104 (1956) https://doi

    Cowan, C.L., Reines, F., Harrison, F.B., Kruse, H.W., McGuire, A.D.: Detection of the free neutrino: A Confirmation. Science 124, 103–104 (1956) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.124.3212.103

    1956 doi

  2. [6]

    : Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND

    Abe, S., et al. : Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 221803 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.100.221803 arXiv:0801.4589 [hep-ex]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [7]

    : Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines by Daya Bay

    An, F.P., et al. : Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines by Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. Lett.130(16), 161802 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.161802 arXiv:2211.14988 [hep-ex]

    2023

  4. [8]

    : Double Chooz θ13 measurement via total neutron cap- ture detection

    Kerret, H., et al. : Double Chooz θ13 measurement via total neutron cap- ture detection. Nature Phys. 16(5), 558–564 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-020-0831-y arXiv:1901.09445 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [9]

    Bak, G., et al.: Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation Amplitude and Frequency at RENO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(20), 201801 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.201801 arXiv:1806.00248 [hep-ex] 23

    2018 arXiv

  6. [10]

    : STEREO neutrino spectrum of 235U fission rejects sterile neutrino hypothesis

    Almaz´ an, H.,et al. : STEREO neutrino spectrum of 235U fission rejects sterile neutrino hypothesis. Nature 613(7943), 257–261 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-05568-2 arXiv:2210.07664 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [11]

    Andriamirado, M., et al.: Improved short-baseline neutrino oscillation search and energy spectrum measurement with the PROSPECT experiment at HFIR. Phys. Rev. D 103(3), 032001 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.032001 arXiv:2006.11210 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [12]

    : Search for sterile neutrinos at the DANSS experiment

    Alekseev, I., et al. : Search for sterile neutrinos at the DANSS experiment. Phys. Lett. B 787, 56–63 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.038 arXiv:1804.04046 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [13]

    : Search for sterile neutrino oscillations using RENO and NEOS data

    Atif, Z., et al. : Search for sterile neutrino oscillations using RENO and NEOS data. Phys. Rev. D 105(11), 111101 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 105.L111101 arXiv:2011.00896 [hep-ex]

    2022

  10. [14]

    JHEP 05, 017 (2022) https://doi

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A., et al.: Search for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at a nuclear reactor with CONNIE 2019 data. JHEP 05, 017 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1007/JHEP05(2022)017 arXiv:2110.13033 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [15]

    : First results of the νGeN experiment on coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering

    Alekseev, I., et al. : First results of the νGeN experiment on coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering. Phys. Rev. D106(5), 051101 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051101 arXiv:2205.04305 [nucl-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [16]

    : Exploring CEνNS with NUCLEUS at the Chooz nuclear power plant

    Angloher, G., et al. : Exploring CEνNS with NUCLEUS at the Chooz nuclear power plant. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(12), 1018 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-019-7454-4 arXiv:1905.10258 [physics.ins-det]

    2019

  13. [18]

    : Constraints on elastic neutrino nucleus scattering in the fully coherent regime from the CONUS experiment

    Bonet, H., et al. : Constraints on elastic neutrino nucleus scattering in the fully coherent regime from the CONUS experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(4), 041804 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041804 arXiv:2011.00210 [hep- ex]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [19]

    : Ricochet Progress and Status

    Augier, C., et al. : Ricochet Progress and Status. J. Low Temp. Phys. 212, 127–137 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-023-02971-5 arXiv:2111.06745 [physics.ins-det]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Kerman, S., Sharma, V., Deniz, M., Wong, H.T., Chen, J.-W., Li, H.B., Lin, S.T., Liu, C.-P., Yue, Q.: Coherency in Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. D 93(11), 113006 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.113006 arXiv:1603.08786 [hep-ph] 24

    2016 arXiv

  16. [21]

    : Exploring coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering using reactor electron antineutrinos in the NEON experiment

    Choi, J.J., et al. : Exploring coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering using reactor electron antineutrinos in the NEON experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 83(3), 226 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11352-x arXiv:2204.06318 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [22]

    PoS TAUP2023, 296 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.22323/1.441.0296

    Yang, L.T., Liang, Y.F., Yue, Q.: RECODE program for reactor neutrino CEvNS detection with PPC Germanium detector. PoS TAUP2023, 296 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.22323/1.441.0296

    2024 doi

  18. [23]

    Akimov, D.Y., et al.: First constraints on the coherent elastic scattering of reactor antineutrinos off xenon nuclei. Phys. Rev. D 111(7), 072012 (2025) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.072012 arXiv:2411.18641 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  19. [24]

    : First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT

    Aprile, E., et al. : First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(19), 191002 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.191002 arXiv:2408.02877 [nucl- ex]

    2024

  20. [25]

    : First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T

    Bo, Z., et al. : First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(19), 191001 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.191001 arXiv:2407.10892 [hep- ex]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [26]

    : Large-size sub-keV sensitive germanium detectors for the CONUS experiment

    Bonet, H., et al. : Large-size sub-keV sensitive germanium detectors for the CONUS experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 81(3), 267 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-021-09038-3 arXiv:2010.11241 [physics.ins-det]

    2021

  22. [27]

    : Final CONUS Results on Coherent Elastic Neutrino- Nucleus Scattering at the Brokdorf Reactor

    Ackermann, N., et al. : Final CONUS Results on Coherent Elastic Neutrino- Nucleus Scattering at the Brokdorf Reactor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(25), 251802 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.251802 arXiv:2401.07684 [hep- ex]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Ackermann, N., et al.: CONUS+ Experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C84(12), 1265 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13551-6 arXiv:2407.11912 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Bonet, H., et al.: Full background decomposition of the CONUS experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 83(3), 195 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11240-4 arXiv:2112.09585 [physics.ins-det]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [31]

    : Antineutrino energy spectrum unfolding based on the Daya Bay measurement and its applications

    An, F.P., et al. : Antineutrino energy spectrum unfolding based on the Daya Bay measurement and its applications. Chin. Phys. C 45(7), 073001 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abfc38 arXiv:2102.04614 [hep-ex] 25

    2021

  26. [32]

    Matematisk-fysiske meddelelser

    Lindhard, J., Scharff, M., Schiøtt, H.E.: Range Concepts and Heavy Ion Ranges. Matematisk-fysiske meddelelser. Munksgaard (1963). https://books.google.de/ books?id=M2yrnQEACAAJ

    1963

  27. [35]

    : Pulse shape discrimination for the CONUS experiment in the keV and sub-keV regime

    Bonet, H., et al. : Pulse shape discrimination for the CONUS experiment in the keV and sub-keV regime. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(2), 139 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjc/s10052-024-12470-w arXiv:2308.12105 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Atzori Corona, M., Cadeddu, M., Cargioli, N., Dordei, F., Giunti, C.: On the impact of the Migdal effect in reactor CE νNS experiments. Phys. Lett. B 852, 138627 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138627 arXiv:2307.12911 [hep-ph]

    2024

  29. [37]

    Akimov, D., et al.: Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(8), 081801 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.081801 arXiv:2110.07730 [hep- ex]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    JHEP 08, 171 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2024)171 arXiv:2401.13025 [hep-ph]

    Lindner, M., Rink, T., Sen, M.: Light vector bosons and the weak mixing angle in the light of future germanium-based reactor CEνNS experiments. JHEP 08, 171 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2024)171 arXiv:2401.13025 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    : MaGe-a Geant4-based Monte Carlo Application Framework for Low-background Germanium Experiments

    Boswell, M., et al. : MaGe-a Geant4-based Monte Carlo Application Framework for Low-background Germanium Experiments. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 58, 1212– 1220 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2011.2144619 arXiv:1011.3827 [nucl- ex]

    2011

  32. [40]

    Radiation Protection Dosimetry 110(1-4), 387–392 (2004) https://doi

    Goldhagen, P., Clem, J.M., Wilson, J.W.: The energy spectrum of cosmic-ray induced neutrons measured on an airplane over a wide range of altitude and latitude. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 110(1-4), 387–392 (2004) https://doi. org/10.1093/rpd/nch216

    2004 doi

  33. [41]

    IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 51(6), 3427–3434 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2004.839134 26

    Gordon, M.S., Goldhagen, P., Rodbell, K.P., Zabel, T.H., Tang, H.H.K., Clem, J.M., Bailey, P.: Measurement of the flux and energy spectrum of cosmic-ray induced neutrons on the ground. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 51(6), 3427–3434 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.200...

    2004

  34. [42]

    Bugaev, E.V., Misaki, A., Naumov, V.A., Sinegovskaya, T.S., Sinegovsky, S.I., Takahashi, N.: Atmospheric muon flux at sea level, underground, and underwater. Phys. Rev. D 58, 054001 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.054001

    1998 doi

  35. [43]

    Reyna, D.: A simple parameterization of the cosmic-ray muon momentum spectra at the surface as a function of zenith angle (2006) arXiv:hep-ph/0604145 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Engel, J.: Nuclear form-factors for the scattering of weakly interacting mas- sive particles. Phys. Lett. B 264, 114–119 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(91)90712-Y

    1991

  37. [45]

    : Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches

    Silk, J., et al. : Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511770739

    2010

  38. [46]

    : First Measurement of High-Energy Reactor Antineutrinos at Daya Bay

    An, F.P., et al. : First Measurement of High-Energy Reactor Antineutrinos at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(4), 041801 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.129.041801 arXiv:2203.06686 [hep-ex]

    2022

  39. [47]

    : Updated Summation Model: An Improved Agreement with the Daya Bay Antineutrino Fluxes

    Estienne, M., et al. : Updated Summation Model: An Improved Agreement with the Daya Bay Antineutrino Fluxes. Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2), 022502 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.022502 arXiv:1904.09358 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Cadeddu, M., Dordei, F., Giunti, C., Li, Y.F., Zhang, Y.Y.: Neutrino, elec- troweak, and nuclear physics from COHERENT elastic neutrino-nucleus scatter- ing with refined quenching factor. Phys. Rev. D 101(3), 033004 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.033004 arXiv:190...

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.