Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

OVO-Bench: How Far is Your Video-LLMs from Real-World Online Video Understanding?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.05510 v2 pith:HTRKOA7D submitted 2025-01-09 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords videoonlineovo-benchllmsquestionunderstandingeventsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Temporal Awareness, the ability to reason dynamically based on the timestamp when a question is raised, is the key distinction between offline and online video LLMs. Unlike offline models, which rely on complete videos for static, post hoc analysis, online models process video streams incrementally and dynamically adapt their responses based on the timestamp at which the question is posed. Despite its significance, temporal awareness has not been adequately evaluated in existing benchmarks. To fill this gap, we present OVO-Bench (Online-VideO-Benchmark), a novel video benchmark that emphasizes the importance of timestamps for advanced online video understanding capability benchmarking. OVO-Bench evaluates the ability of video LLMs to reason and respond to events occurring at specific timestamps under three distinct scenarios: (1) Backward tracing: trace back to past events to answer the question. (2) Real-time understanding: understand and respond to events as they unfold at the current timestamp. (3) Forward active responding: delay the response until sufficient future information becomes available to answer the question accurately. OVO-Bench comprises 12 tasks, featuring 644 unique videos and approximately human-curated 2,800 fine-grained meta-annotations with precise timestamps. We combine automated generation pipelines with human curation. With these high-quality samples, we further developed an evaluation pipeline to systematically query video LLMs along the video timeline. Evaluations of nine Video-LLMs reveal that, despite advancements on traditional benchmarks, current models struggle with online video understanding, showing a significant gap compared to human agents. We hope OVO-Bench will drive progress in video LLMs and inspire future research in online video reasoning. Our benchmark and code can be accessed at https://github.com/JoeLeelyf/OVO-Bench.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VIABench: A Comprehensive Video Benchmark Collected from Blind Individuals for Visual Impairment Assistance

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    VIABench provides 761 long-form egocentric videos from blind individuals with 14,526 annotations across three assistance tasks, and shows current multimodal LLMs achieve best overall scores below 30.

  2. ObjectStream: Latent Objects as Memory Anchors for Streaming Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training-free latent-object memory anchors let frozen Video-LLMs retain object histories under a tight token budget and improve streaming and long-video QA.

  3. ProactiveVideoQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluating Proactive Interactions in Video Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ProactiveVideoQA is a benchmark for proactive video question answering, and the proposed PAUC metric jointly scores response timing and content, claiming better alignment with human preferences.

  4. VideoRoPE: What Makes for Good Video Rotary Position Embedding?

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VideoRoPE improves video rotary position embedding by allocating low-frequency channels to time, interleaving spatial channels, and adding tunable temporal spacing, beating prior RoPE variants on long-video benchmarks.

Pith tools