Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Prompt gravitational-wave mergers aided by gas in Active Galactic Nuclei: The hydrodynamics of binary-single black hole scatterings

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gas in AGN discs efficiently dissipates energy in binary-single black hole encounters, hardening the resulting triple by two to three orders of magnitude and raising merger probability by at least a factor of 3.5–8.

desk verdict First hydro sims of binary-single BH encounters in AGN discs; the hardening result is solid, but the 3.5-8x merger enhancement is an optimistic upper-side estimate, not a robust floor. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09017 v1 pith:KTK2BRPE submitted 2025-01-15 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Connar Rowan , Henry Whitehead , Gaia Fabj , Pankaj Saini , Bence Kocsis , Martin Pessah , Johan Samsing This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords AGNdiscsbinary-singlescatteringblackholemergershydrodynamicalsimulationsthree-bodydynamicsgasdynamicaldraggravitationalwavesshearingbox
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the ambient gas in an active galactic nucleus (AGN) disc changes what happens when a single black hole meets a binary black hole. Using 72 two-dimensional hydrodynamical shearing-box simulations spanning three gas densities and 24 impact parameters, it argues that gas is not a minor correction: it removes energy from the three-body system, can bind the incoming single into a quasi-stable hierarchical triple, and reliably shrinks the triple by two to three orders of magnitude within a few AGN orbits. The paper concludes that this gas-driven hardening raises the probability of a gravitational-wave merger by a minimum factor of 3.5–8, and that gasless estimates of the binary-single merger timescale are upper bounds. A sympathetic reader would take away that gas is a decisive ingredient in the AGN channel for black hole mergers.

What carries the argument

The central object is the three-body energy $E_{\rm trip} = \sum_i \tfrac12 M_i v_i^2 - \sum_{j>i} G M_i M_j / r_{ij}$, together with the gas mass enclosed in the Hill spheres of the binary, the single, and the triple, which acts as the dissipative reservoir. The mechanism is gas dynamical drag in a two-dimensional, isothermal, shearing-box AGN disc model with viscosity parameter $\alpha = 0.1$ and non-accreting point black holes; adaptive mesh refinement resolves the gas around each black hole down to $\delta_{\min} \simeq 3\times10^{-4} r_{H,t}$. The encounter classification into glancing, hierarchical, temporary chaotic, and hardened chaotic outcomes is the organizing device, and the hardened chaotic case is where dissipation contracts the triple faster than a member can be ejected, which the paper then connects to merger probability through the Peters gravitational-wave inspiral equations.

What would settle it

The decisive test is a higher-resolution or non-isothermal rerun of the same 72 initial conditions: if the gas mass inside the Hill spheres at encounter is lower, the hardened-chaotic fraction should drop, and if the triple stops hardening once scales below the resolution limit are resolved, the predicted prompt mergers would not occur.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that gas drag is an active participant in binary-single black hole encounters in AGN discs, not a negligible perturbation. In the simulations, the gas inside the Hill spheres of the binary and the single dissipates the three-body energy at the first encounter, frequently producing a bound triple; after that, the gas continually removes energy, hardening both the most bound pair and the wider single orbit. The authors classify outcomes into glancing encounters, hierarchical encounters, temporary chaotic encounters, and hardened chaotic encounters, and find that at higher gas density the hardened chaotic class dominates: 13 of 24 runs at the fiducial density versus 5 at one-tenth of that density. In hardened chaotic encounters the triple contracts to the resolution limit, and the paper argues that this contraction raises the per-encounter probability of a close enough approach for a merger by a factor of about 3.5 at the softening length and about 8 at the resolution scale, giving a cumulative merger probability near 0.4–0.65 for a typical number of binary-single states. In several runs two black holes execute periapses below ten Schwarzschild radii, which the authors interpret as prompt merger candidates.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the simulated gas being a faithful energy sink: a two-dimensional, isothermal, $\alpha=0.1$ shearing-box flow with non-accreting point black holes and enough gas mass inside the Hill spheres; the authors note that a non-isothermal treatment lowers that mass and would move outcomes toward their less-hardening low-density runs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In AGN discs, binary-single scatterings that end in a chaotic encounter are more likely to harden the triple than to eject a black hole, because gas removes energy at each close approach.
  • Gas-hardened triples shrink by two to three orders of magnitude in semi-major axis within a few AGN orbits, so the time needed to bring a binary to merger is shorter than gasless timescale estimates.
  • The merger probability per encounter rises by a factor of about 3.5–8 once the triple is hardened to the softening or resolution scale, and with roughly 20 binary-single states the cumulative merger probability is about 0.4–0.65.
  • Higher ambient gas densities produce more hardened chaotic encounters, so denser AGN discs are the most promising sites for prompt, gas-aided black hole mergers.
  • Gas hardening increases the likelihood of unique gravitational-wave signatures: residual eccentricity, dephasing from a tertiary black hole, and repeated or double mergers after a post-merger kick.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same hardening mechanism operates in binary-binary scatterings, as the paper only posits qualitatively, gas drag would also soften the usual binary-binary ejection bias and could raise merger rates; a direct shearing-box test of binary-binary encounters would extend the argument.
  • The per-encounter merger enhancement assumes the eccentricity distribution of binary-single states is unaffected by gas, but the hierarchical encounters in the simulations show gas circularising outer orbits; whether that shift raises or lowers the chance of reaching the extreme eccentricities needed for prompt merger is left open.
  • Because the simulations are two-dimensional and isothermal, the reported factor 3.5–8 is likely nearer an upper end; the authors note that a non-isothermal treatment reduces the Hill-sphere gas mass, which would push outcomes toward the lower-density, less-hardened runs.
  • The ballistic extrapolation from the resolution scale to periapses below ten Schwarzschild radii is where the hydrodynamics stops being followed; adding a gravitational-wave reaction term or resolving a single such close approach in a follow-up simulation would directly test whether the predicted prompt mergers are real.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first hydrodynamical simulations of binary-single black hole encounters embedded in an AGN disc, using a 2D isothermal shearing box with 72 runs over three gas densities and 24 impact parameters. The authors report that gas dissipation promotes the formation of bound triples and identifies four encounter outcomes: glancing, hierarchical, temporary chaotic, and hardened chaotic. They find that gas hardens bound triples by 2–3 orders of magnitude in semi-major axis and estimate that this hardening enhances the per-encounter GW merger probability by a factor 3.5–8. The qualitative claim that gas dissipates three-body energy and hardens triples is directly supported by the simulations and by control runs with gas switched off. The quantitative merger-enhancement claim rests on an analytic eccentricity distribution, an adopted encounter number N_enc=20 from a companion paper, and ballistic extrapolation below the resolution scale.

Significance. If the central result holds, this is an important step: it is the first self-consistent hydrodynamical treatment of a common dynamical channel in AGN discs, and it demonstrates a genuine physical mechanism (gas-driven hardening of binary-single triples) that has been absent from most N-body and analytic treatments. The paper also provides a useful taxonomy of encounter outcomes and a density-dependent hardening trend. The control tests (gas off) and the direct measurement of E_trip and E_bin strengthen the core finding. The quantitative merger-rate enhancement is less secure: the quoted 3.5–8 factor depends on externally adopted distributions and on unresolved small-scale extrapolation, so the paper's headline numbers should be treated as indicative rather than as robust lower bounds.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.7.2, Eq. (26)] The abstract's 'minimum factor of 3.5–8' is not a robust lower bound as stated. The enhancement η uses the co-planar Monaghan eccentricity distribution P(e)∝e/sqrt(1−e^2) and adopts N_enc≈20 from Fabj & Samsing (2024), a paper with overlapping authors, without validating either against the 72 simulations presented here. The word 'minimum' in the text refers only to the assumption that gas does not increase N_enc; other assumptions in the same estimate are favorable rather than conservative. With a different eccentricity distribution or a smaller N_enc, the factor would be lower, so the quantitative claim in the abstract needs to be reworded and the sensitivity to these inputs quantified.
  2. [Sec. 3.7.2 and Sec. 2.4] The claim that 'several cases... execute periapses on the order of less than 10 Schwarzschild radii' relies on an unresolved ballistic extrapolation from the resolution scale δmin≈0.00039 r_H,t≈3×10^4 r_s down to the GW-emission regime. The sentence in Sec. 3.7.2 that these cases 'often occur while the separations of the BHs were thus far fully resolved' describes the approach trajectory, not the sub-resolution plunge, and no hydrodynamical information is available for separations below δmin. The paper's own pessimistic bound in Eq. (19) gives a_bin≈δmin/4≈0.4 R_sun, for which only 28% of systems merge according to Fig. 9. A quantitative merger probability therefore requires either a sub-grid model for gas hardening below δmin or an explicit statement that the 3.5–8 factor is an upper-side estimate conditional on continued hardening down to scales that the simulations do not resolve.
  3. [Sec. 5, Summary and Conclusions] The authors acknowledge that evolving the fluid energy equation (non-isothermal equation of state) in earlier single-single work reduced the Hill-sphere gas mass and produced results more similar to their lower-density runs. Given Table 1, the number of hardened chaotic encounters drops from 13 at Σ=Σ0 to 5 at Σ=0.1Σ0, so a non-isothermal treatment would likely shift the population toward the temporary-chaotic, less-hardened regime and reduce the merger-enhancement factor. The abstract and Sec. 3.7.2 present the 3.5–8 factor as a settled 'minimum enhancement' without carrying this caveat forward; the quantitative claim should be reframed as the most favorable isothermal estimate and the caveat should appear wherever the factor is quoted.
  4. [Sec. 3.7.1, Eqs. (17)–(19)] The derivation of the pessimistic final semi-major axis is internally sound in its outcome, but the notation in Eqs. (17)–(19) is confusing and should be corrected. The left-hand side of Eq. (18) is written as Δa_sin/a_sin while the preceding line derives Δa_bin/a_bin; the subsequent substitution a_bin=a_sin/2 then mixes the two. This is likely a typographical error, but as written it makes the logic hard to follow in a section that is central to the paper's merger-timescale argument.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.7.1, cross-references] The bullet points in Sec. 5 cite 'Sec. 3.7.2' for Eq. (19) and 'Sec. 3.7.1' for Eqs. (25)–(26), but the equation numbers correspond to the opposite subsections; the cross-references should be swapped.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The figure caption repeats 'Top row:' for both the separation plot and the trajectories plot; the second should be labeled 'Middle row:' for clarity.
  3. [Sec. 2.5.3] The sentence 'We prioritise standardising the semi-major axis of the binary at the encounter and therefore turn off the gravitation of the BHs due to the gas until they reach a separation of 2r_H,t' is ambiguous: it could mean gas gravity on the BHs, or the mutual gravity of the BHs, is disabled. Please clarify what is turned off and for which components.
  4. [Sec. 3.7.2] The use of N_enc≈20 from Fabj & Samsing (2024) should be accompanied by the observed range of binary-single states in the present simulations, even if only approximate, so that the sensitivity of P_mrg to this parameter is transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central hardening result is measured directly from hydrodynamical simulations, and the merger-enhancement factor is an analytic post-processing step using an external eccentricity distribution.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claim, that gas dissipates three-body energy and hardens bound triples, is the direct output of 72 Athena++ shearing-box simulations with gas-on and gas-off control tests; it is not constructed from the quantity it predicts. The quantitative enhancement factor (Eqs. 25-26) is obtained by combining the analytically derived critical eccentricity e_mrg(r_t) with the externally published co-planar eccentricity distribution P(e)=e/sqrt(1-e^2) (Monaghan 1976); the ratios of probabilities are not fitted to the simulation data and do not reduce by definition to the measured hardening. The only self-citations (Fabj & Samsing 2024) supply an adopted mean encounter number N_enc≈20 and an analytic approximation for ejection hardening; N_enc enters only the secondary absolute probabilities (~0.4, ~0.65), not the factor 3.5-8, and it is an external model parameter rather than a fit to this paper's outputs, so under the review rules it does not raise the circularity score. The manuscript itself flags the main limitations: the isothermal equation of state may overestimate Hill-sphere gas mass (Sec. 5: 'evolving the fluid energy equation will produce results more akin to our lower density runs'), and the hydrodynamics become inaccurate below the resolution scale delta_min (Sec. 3.7.1), with sub-resolution merger periapses inferred rather than simulated. These are correctness/robustness caveats about extrapolation and model assumptions, not definitional circularity. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on numerical choices (alpha, softening, resolution), the simplified gas model (2D isothermal), and an analytic eccentricity distribution adopted from the literature. The authors flag most of these. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha viscosity = 0.1
    Chosen for all runs; sets effective viscosity and disc scale height, controlling gas morphology and viscous timescales used in merger estimates.
  • softening length h_i = 0.005 r_H,i
    Numerical smoothing for gas-BH gravity; sets the smallest hydrodynamically reliable scale, about 10 delta_min.
  • number of binary-single states N_enc = 20
    Adopted from Fabj & Samsing (2024) to convert per-encounter merger probability into total probability; not measured in this paper.
  • resolution limit delta_min = 0.00039 r_H,t (approx 3e4 r_s)
    Sets the smallest resolved scale; the extrapolated final binary semi-major axis delta_min/4 depends on it.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Isothermal equation of state P = Sigma c_s^2
    Used throughout; authors note non-isothermal evolution reduces Hill-sphere mass and may shift outcomes toward temporary chaotic encounters (Sec. 5).
  • domain assumption 2D co-planar shearing-box geometry
    All scatterings are co-planar with zero inclination; authors note inclination and vertical structure may alter dissipation (Sec. 4).
  • domain assumption Non-accreting point BHs with softened gas gravity
    Mass accretion and gas torques on BHs are neglected; authors cite earlier work suggesting comparable dissipation with similar softening.
  • domain assumption Newtonian BH dynamics with no GW backreaction in simulation
    GW emission is added only through post-hoc Peters-inspiral estimates; close encounters below resolution are inferred.
  • ad hoc to paper Minimum-energy ejection at the resolution limit
    Sec. 3.7.1 assumes the ejected BH carries just enough energy to reach r_H,t, giving final binary semi-major axis delta_min/4; conservative but sets the merger fraction.
  • standard math Eccentricity distribution P(e) = e/sqrt(1-e^2)
    Co-planar three-body distribution from Monaghan (1976) used to compute merger probability enhancement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prompt gravitational-wave mergers aided by gas in Active Galactic Nuclei: The hydrodynamics of binary-single black hole scatterings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KTK2BRPE

@misc{pith2026250109017,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prompt gravitational-wave mergers aided by gas in Active Galactic Nuclei: The hydrodynamics of binary-single black hole scatterings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KTK2BRPE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09017}
}
abstract

Black hole binary systems embedded in AGN discs have been proposed as a source of the observed gravitational waves (GWs) from LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA. Studies have indicated binary-single encounters could be common place within this population, yet we lack a comprehensive understanding of how the ambient gas affects the dynamics of these three-body encounters. We present the first hydrodynamical simulations of black hole binary-single encounters in an AGN disc. We find gas is a non-negligible component of binary-single interactions, leading to unique dynamics, including the formation of quasi-stable hierarchical triples. The gas efficiently and reliably dissipates the energy of the three-body system, hardening the triple provided it remains bound after the initial encounter. The hardening timescale is shorter for higher ambient gas densities. Formed triple systems can be hardened reliably by $2-3$ orders of magnitude relative to the initial binary semi-major axis within less than a few AGN orbits, limited only by our resolution. We calculate that the gas hardening of the triple enhances the probability for a merger by a minimum factor of $3.5-8$ depending on our assumptions. In several cases, two of the black holes can execute periapses on the order of less than $10$ Schwarzschild radii, where the dynamics were fully resolved for previous close approaches. The likelihood of these prompt mergers increases when the gas density is larger. Our results suggest that current timescale estimates (without gas drag) for binary-single induced mergers are an upper bound. The shrinkage of the triple by gas has the prospect of increasing the chance for unique GW phenomena such as residual eccentricity, dephasing from a third object and double GW mergers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09017 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time evolution of gas properties in the vicinity of the binary and single prior to encounter for the simulation with 𝑝 = 1.7𝑟H,3 and Σ = 0.1Σ0. Top: the gas mass 𝑚H contained within the Hill sphere of the binary (𝑟 < 𝑟H,12) and single (𝑟 < 𝑟H,3), normalised to the mass initially enclosed within their respective Hill radii 𝑚H,0. Bottom: the angular momentum of the enclosed gas 𝐿H (as measured from the single and the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The timeline of a binary-single scattering simulation (Σ = 0.1Σ0, 𝑝 = 1.4𝑟H,t), visualised through the surface density Σ normalised to the initial ambient value Σ∞. Panel I: The binary is initialised in its offset position with the shear centred on its COM. II: The single is injected (green dot) and the radial location where the shear vanishes 𝑥C is shifted to the origin, which is the COM of the three-body system. I… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example encounter with Σ = 0.1Σ0 and 𝑝 = 1.7𝑟H,t . Top left: the gas morphology at the moment the minidiscs of the binary and single collide, the colours represent the surface density relative to the ambient value of the simulation Σ∞. Top centre: the morphology of the gas as the the single begins plunging into the binary. Bottom left: The gas morphology following the first major encounter of the third object. He… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of the three-body energy 𝐸trip in the fiducial simu￾lation. Top: The three body energy of the system (Eq. 14) and energy of the most bound BH pair (Eq. 15) as a function of time in units of Ω−1 0 . Bottom: The separation between each of the three objects …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The trajectories and object separations for the four characteristic types of triple encouners in gas. Left to right: Glancing encounter, hierarchical encounter, temporary chaotic encounter, hardened chaotic encounter. Top row: The separation between each pair of BHs Δ𝑟…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example of a hardened chaotic encounter, from a run with 𝑝 = 1.7𝑟H,t and Σ = Σ0. Top:the gas morphology after the second triple encounter, where the triple becomes strongly bound. Black markers have been added to better indicate the positions of the BHs. Middle: the en…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The closest approach of the single 𝑟p,sin,1 as measured from the binary COM as a function of impact parameter 𝑝 for each simulation suite in density Σ. The data points are colour coded by the type of encounter: no close interaction (F), glancing encounter (G), hierarch…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: regardless of whether 𝜏GW < 𝜏visc or not. • We assume a BH is ejected with the minimum amount of en￾ergy to reach 𝑟H,t . In reality the ejected BH can carry more energy away from the system, leaving behind a tighter binary. Where the remaining energy of the binary appr…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The enhancement of the merger probability due to gas hardening. Top: the minimum critical eccentricity 𝑒mrg (Eq. 25) required for two BHs to merge during a triple exchange as a function of the compactness of the triple 𝑟t in Schwarzschild radii. Also shown is the prob…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Environmental effects in stellar mass gravitational wave sources II: Enhanced detectability of phase shifts in eccentric sub-populations

    astro-ph.HE 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Eccentricity boosts the detectability of environmental dephasing in gravitational-wave signals by up to ℓ_max^{1-n}, potentially making environmental effects ubiquitous in future detectors' eccentric sources.

  2. Simulation of Binary-Single Interactions in AGN Disk I: Gas-Enhanced Binary Orbital Hardening

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gas in AGN disks absorbs orbital energy during binary-single black hole encounters, making the final binary more compact and shortening its gravitational-wave merger time.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J., Zare K., 1974, @doi [Celestial Mechanics] 10.1007/BF01227619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974CeMec..10..185A 10, 185

    Aarseth S. J., Zare K., 1974, @doi [Celestial Mechanics] 10.1007/BF01227619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974CeMec..10..185A 10, 185

    doi:10.1007/bf01227619 1974

  2. [2]

    P., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvL.116f1102A 116, 061102

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvL.116f1102A 116, 061102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  3. [3]

    P., et al., 2019, @doi [Physical Review X] 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhRvX...9c1040A 9, 031040

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2019, @doi [Physical Review X] 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhRvX...9c1040A 9, 031040

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019

  4. [4]

    Abbott R., et al., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043015 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvD.102d3015A 102, 043015

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015

  5. [5]

    Abbott R., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvL.125j1102A 125, 101102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102

  6. [6]

    P., et al., 2020c, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...892L...3A 892, L3

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2020c, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...892L...3A 892, L3

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5

  7. [7]

    Abbott R., et al., 2020d, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896L..44A 896, L44

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f

  8. [8]

    arXiv:2203.12038

    Abbott R., et al., 2022a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2203.12038 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220312038T p. arXiv:2203.12038

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.12038

Show all 144 references
  1. [9]

    Abbott R., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac532b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...928..186A 928, 186

    doi

  2. [10]

    Abbott R., et al., 2023a, @doi [Phys. Rev. X] 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 , 13, 011048

    doi

  3. [11]

    Abbott R., et al., 2023b, @doi [Phys. Rev. X] 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 , 13, 041039

    doi

  4. [12]

    B., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...27A 757, 27

    Antonini F., Perets H. B., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...27A 757, 27

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831..187A 831, 187

    Antonini F., Rasio F. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831..187A 831, 187

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    Antonini F., Murray N., Mikkola S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...45A 781, 45

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Antonini F., Gieles M., Dosopoulou F., Chattopadhyay D., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad972 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522..466A 522, 466

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Arca Sedda M., Li G., Kocsis B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038795 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650A.189A 650, A189

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    B., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/281.3.830 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.281..830B 281, 830

    Bacon D., Sigurdsson S., Davies M. B., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/281.3.830 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.281..830B 281, 830

    1996 doi

  10. [18]

    Bartos I., Kocsis B., Haiman Z., M \'a rka S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..165B 835, 165

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Baruteau C., Cuadra J., Lin D. N. C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/28 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...726...28B 726, 28

    2011 doi

  12. [20]

    L., Ruiter A., Valsecchi F., Vink J

    Belczynski K., Bulik T., Fryer C. L., Ruiter A., Valsecchi F., Vink J. S., Hurley J. R., 2010a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714.1217B 714, 1217

    doi

  13. [21]

    E., 2010b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...715L.138B 715, L138

    Belczynski K., Dominik M., Bulik T., O'Shaughnessy R., Fryer C., Holz D. E., 2010b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...715L.138B 715, L138

    doi

  14. [22]

    Belczynski K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628980 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..97B 594, A97

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    H., Socrates A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...578..775B 578, 775

    Blaes O., Lee M. H., Socrates A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...578..775B 578, 775

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    Boekholt T. C. N., Rowan C., Kocsis B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3495 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.5653B 518, 5653

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvD.110h3040B 110, 083040

    Borhanian S., Sathyaprakash B. S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083040 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvD.110h3040B 110, 083040

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Dittmann A

    Calcino J., Dempsey A. M., Dittmann A. J., Li H., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4a53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970..107C 970, 107

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    O., Zlochower Y., Merritt D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.231102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhRvL..98w1102C 98, 231102

    Campanelli M., Lousto C. O., Zlochower Y., Merritt D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.231102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhRvL..98w1102C 98, 231102

    2007 doi

  20. [28]

    Dall'Amico M., Mapelli M., Torniamenti S., Arca Sedda M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.186D 683, A186

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    arXiv:2212.02650

    DeLaurentiis S., Epstein-Martin M., Haiman Z., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221202650D p. arXiv:2212.02650

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Delfavero V., Ford K. E. S., McKernan B., Cook H. E., Nathaniel K., Postiglione J., Ray S., O'Shaughnessy R., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18815 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241018815D p. arXiv:2410.18815

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    N., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498..495D 498, 495

    Di Carlo U. N., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498..495D 498, 495

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Cantiello M., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.02981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240902981D p

    Dittmann A. J., Cantiello M., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.02981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240902981D p. arXiv:2409.02981

    2024 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    J., Ryan G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac935 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.6158D 513, 6158

    Dittmann A. J., Ryan G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac935 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.6158D 513, 6158

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    arXiv:2404.08138

    Dodici M., Tremaine S., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.08138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240408138D p. arXiv:2404.08138

    2024 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    E., Berti E., Bulik T., Mandel I., O'Shaughnessy R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/52 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...759...52D 759, 52

    Dominik M., Belczynski K., Fryer C., Holz D. E., Berti E., Bulik T., Mandel I., O'Shaughnessy R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/52 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...759...52D 759, 52

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    E., Berti E., Bulik T., Mandel I., O'Shaughnessy R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/72 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...779...72D 779, 72

    Dominik M., Belczynski K., Fryer C., Holz D. E., Berti E., Bulik T., Mandel I., O'Shaughnessy R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/72 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...779...72D 779, 72

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    Dominik M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/263 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..263D 806, 263

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    Downing J. M. B., Benacquista M. J., Giersz M., Spurzem R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17040.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.407.1946D 407, 1946

    2010

  31. [39]

    Duch \^e ne G., Kraus A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA&A..51..269D 51, 269

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    P., Kiseleva-Eggleton L., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323843 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...562.1012E 562, 1012

    Eggleton P. P., Kiseleva-Eggleton L., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323843 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...562.1012E 562, 1012

    2001 doi

  33. [41]

    arXiv:2306.13745

    Evans M., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2306.13745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230613745E p. arXiv:2306.13745

    2023 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    Fabj G., Samsing J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.tmp.2452F

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    S., Caban F., Ford K

    Fabj G., Nasim S. S., Caban F., Ford K. E. S., McKernan B., Bellovary J. M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.2608F 499, 2608

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Ford K. E. S., McKernan B., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2861 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.5827F 517, 5827

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    B., Kozinsky B., Rasio F

    Ford E. B., Kozinsky B., Rasio F. A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308815 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...535..385F 535, 385

    2000 doi

  38. [46]

    Fragione G., Kocsis B., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.4781F 486, 4781

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    Franciolini G., Iacovelli F., Mancarella M., Maggiore M., Pani P., Riotto A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043506 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PhRvD.108d3506F 108, 043506

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Bonnerot C., Gerosa D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.3689G 530, 3689

    Gangardt D., Trani A. A., Bonnerot C., Gerosa D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.3689G 530, 3689

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Giacobbo N., Mapelli M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1999 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.2011G 480, 2011

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    B., Perets H

    Ginat Y. B., Perets H. B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2565 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508..190G 508, 190

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    Goldreich P., Tremaine S., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/156203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...222..850G 222, 850

    1978 doi

  44. [52]

    A., Sperhake U., Br \"u gmann B., Hannam M., Husa S., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhRvL..98i1101G 98, 091101

    Gonz \'a lez J. A., Sperhake U., Br \"u gmann B., Hannam M., Husa S., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhRvL..98i1101G 98, 091101

    2007 doi

  45. [53]

    C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/386360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...608..108G 608, 108

    Goodman J., Tan J. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/386360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...608..108G 608, 108

    2004 doi

  46. [54]

    Gr \"o bner M., Ishibashi W., Tiwari S., Haney M., Jetzer P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A.119G 638, A119

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    Gruzinov A., Levin Y., Zhu J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfaa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905...11G 905, 11

    2020 doi

  48. [56]

    S., Samsing J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..850H 494, 850

    Hamers A. S., Samsing J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..850H 494, 850

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    F., Gammie C

    Hawley J. F., Gammie C. F., Balbus S. A., 1994, in Bicknell G. V., Dopita M. A., Quinn P. J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 54, The Physics of Active Galaxies. p. 73

    1994

  50. [58]

    F., Gammie C

    Hawley J. F., Gammie C. F., Balbus S. A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175311 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...440..742H 440, 742

    1995 doi

  51. [59]

    C., 1974, @doi [Celestial Mechanics] 10.1007/BF01227621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974CeMec..10..217H 10, 217

    Heggie D. C., 1974, @doi [Celestial Mechanics] 10.1007/BF01227621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974CeMec..10..217H 10, 217

    1974 doi

  52. [60]

    C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.04027.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.318L..61H 318, L61

    Heggie D. C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.04027.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.318L..61H 318, L61

    2000

  53. [61]

    arXiv:2408.04603

    Hendriks K., Zwick L., Samsing J., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.04603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240804603H p. arXiv:2408.04603

    doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    arXiv:2411.08572

    Hendriks K., et al., 2024b, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2411.08572 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241108572H p. arXiv:2411.08572

    doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    arXiv:0810.0604

    Hild S., Chelkowski S., Freise A., 2008, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.0810.0604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008arXiv0810.0604H p. arXiv:0810.0604

    2008 doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    A., Dosopoulou F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaafce , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856..140H 856, 140

    Hoang B.-M., Naoz S., Kocsis B., Rasio F. A., Dosopoulou F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaafce , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856..140H 856, 140

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    Hut P., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983AJ.....88.1549H 88, 1549

    1983 doi

  58. [66]

    Ishibashi W., Gr \"o bner M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037799 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...639A.108I 639, A108

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Ishibashi W., Gr \"o bner M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae569 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529..883I 529, 883

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    Kim H., Kim W.-T., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..432K 665, 432

    2007 doi

  61. [69]

    J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679L..33K 679, L33

    Kim H., Kim W.-T., S \'a nchez-Salcedo F. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679L..33K 679, L33

    2008 doi

  62. [70]

    Kocsis B., Tremaine S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.3265K 448, 3265

    2015 doi

  63. [71]

    Kozai Y., 1962, @doi [ ] 10.1086/108790 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962AJ.....67..591K 67, 591

    1962 doi

  64. [72]

    Leigh N. W. C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.5672L 474, 5672

    2018 doi

  65. [73]

    arXiv:2207.01125

    Li R., Lai D., 2022, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2207.01125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220701125L p. arXiv:2207.01125

    2022 doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    M., Li H., Lai D., Li S., 2022a, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221110357L p

    Li J., Dempsey A. M., Li H., Lai D., Li S., 2022a, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221110357L p. arXiv:2211.10357

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Li J., Lai D., Rodet L., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c0d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934..154L 934, 154

    doi

  68. [76]

    L., 1962, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962P&SS....9..719L 9, 719

    Lidov M. L., 1962, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962P&SS....9..719L 9, 719

    1962 doi

  69. [77]

    M., Postnov K

    Lipunov V. M., Postnov K. A., Prokhorov M. E., 1997, Astronomy Letters, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AstL...23..492L 23, 492

    1997

  70. [78]

    Liu B., Lai D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab178 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.2049L 502, 2049

    2021 doi

  71. [79]

    Magnan N., Fouvry J.-B., Pichon C., Chavanis P.-H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.3452M 514, 3452

    2022 doi

  72. [80]

    arXiv:2202.07665

    M \'a th \'e G., Sz \"o lgy \'e n \'A ., Kocsis B., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220207665M p. arXiv:2202.07665

    2022 arXiv

  73. [81]

    McKernan B., Ford K. E. S., O'Shaugnessy R., Wysocki D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa740 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.1203M 494, 1203

    2020 doi

  74. [82]

    Mikkola S., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/207.1.115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984MNRAS.207..115M 207, 115

    1984 doi

  75. [83]

    C., Hamilton D

    Miller M. C., Hamilton D. P., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05112.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.330..232C 330, 232

    2002

  76. [84]

    J., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/176.1.63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976MNRAS.176...63M 176, 63

    Monaghan J. J., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/176.1.63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976MNRAS.176...63M 176, 63

    1976 doi

  77. [85]

    Mouri H., Taniguchi Y., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/339472 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566L..17M 566, L17

    2002 doi

  78. [86]

    Nagasawa M., Ida S., Bessho T., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/529369 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...678..498N 678, 498

    2008 doi

  79. [87]

    Naoz S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ARA&A..54..441N 54, 441

    2016 doi

  80. [88]

    Naoz S., Kocsis B., Loeb A., Yunes N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773..187N 773, 187

    2013 doi

  81. [89]

    M., Kocsis B., Loeb A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14653.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.395.2127O 395, 2127

    O'Leary R. M., Kocsis B., Loeb A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14653.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.395.2127O 395, 2127

    2009

  82. [90]

    J., Samsing J., Pessah M

    O'Neill D., D'Orazio D. J., Samsing J., Pessah M. E., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7250 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974..216O 974, 216

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513..252O 513, 252

    Ostriker E. C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513..252O 513, 252

    1999 doi

  84. [92]

    Panamarev T., Shukirgaliyev B., Meiron Y., Berczik P., Just A., Spurzem R., Omarov C., Vilkoviskij E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.4224P 476, 4224

    2018 doi

  85. [93]

    B., Naoz S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/L17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699L..17P 699, L17

    Perets H. B., Naoz S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/L17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699L..17P 699, L17

    2009 doi

  86. [94]

    C., 1964, @doi [Physical Review] 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B1224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964PhRv..136.1224P 136, 1224

    Peters P. C., 1964, @doi [Physical Review] 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B1224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964PhRv..136.1224P 136, 1224

    1964 doi

  87. [95]

    F., McMillan S

    Portegies Zwart S. F., McMillan S. L. W., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528L..17P 528, L17

    2000 doi

  88. [96]

    J., Monaghan J

    Price D. J., Monaghan J. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11241.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374.1347P 374, 1347

    2007

  89. [97]

    P., Tremaine S., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S1384-1076(96)00012-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996NewA....1..149R 1, 149

    Rauch K. P., Tremaine S., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S1384-1076(96)00012-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996NewA....1..149R 1, 149

    1996 doi

  90. [98]

    Reitze D., et al., 2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. p. 35 ( @eprint arXiv 1907.04833 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1907.04833

    2019 doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    L., Morscher M., Pattabiraman B., Chatterjee S., Haster C.-J., Rasio F

    Rodriguez C. L., Morscher M., Pattabiraman B., Chatterjee S., Haster C.-J., Rasio F. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.051101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvL.115e1101R 115, 051101

    2015 doi

  92. [100]

    L., Chatterjee S., Rasio F

    Rodriguez C. L., Chatterjee S., Rasio F. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvD..93h4029R 93, 084029

    2016 doi

  93. [101]

    L., Amaro-Seoane P., Chatterjee S., Rasio F

    Rodriguez C. L., Amaro-Seoane P., Chatterjee S., Rasio F. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.151101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.120o1101R 120, 151101

    2018 doi

  94. [102]

    Rom B., Sari R., Lai D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad284b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...43R 964, 43

    2024 doi

  95. [103]

    Rowan C., Boekholt T., Kocsis B., Haiman Z., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1926 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2770R 524, 2770

    2023 doi

  96. [104]

    arXiv:2412.12086

    Rowan C., Whitehead H., Kocsis B., 2024a, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241212086R p. arXiv:2412.12086

  97. [105]

    Rowan C., Whitehead H., Boekholt T., Kocsis B., Haiman Z., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3641 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.52710448R 527, 10448

    doi

  98. [106]

    B., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221200807R p

    Rozner M., Generozov A., Perets H. B., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221200807R p. arXiv:2212.00807

    2022 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Ryu T., Leigh N. W. C., Perna R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4447R 467, 4447

    2017 doi

  100. [108]

    Saini P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528..833S 528, 833

    2024 doi

  101. [109]

    J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.5445S 481, 5445

    Samsing J., D'Orazio D. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.5445S 481, 5445

    2018 doi

  102. [110]

    Samsing J., Ilan T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1548S 476, 1548

    2018 doi

  103. [111]

    Samsing J., Ilan T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2249 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482...30S 482, 30

    2019 doi

  104. [112]

    Samsing J., MacLeod M., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784...71S 784, 71

    2014 doi

  105. [113]

    Samsing J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-04333-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Natur.603..237S 603, 237

    2022 doi

  106. [114]

    J., Liu B., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.05625 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240305625S p

    Samsing J., Hendriks K., Zwick L., D'Orazio D. J., Liu B., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.05625 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240305625S p. arXiv:2403.05625

    2024 doi arXiv

  107. [115]

    Secunda A., Bellovary J., Mac Low M.-M., Ford K. E. S., McKernan B., Leigh N. W. C., Lyra W., S \'a ndor Z., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ca , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...878...85S 878, 85

    2019 doi

  108. [116]

    Secunda A., Hernandez B., Goodman J., Leigh N. W. C., McKernan B., Ford K. E. S., Adorno J. I., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abe11d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908L..27S 908, L27

    2021 doi

  109. [117]

    Silsbee K., Tremaine S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...39S 836, 39

    2017 doi

  110. [118]

    Sirko E., Goodman J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06431.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341..501S 341, 501

    2003

  111. [119]

    Sollima A., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13387.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.388..307S 388, 307

    2008

  112. [120]

    C., Leigh N

    Stone N. C., Leigh N. W. C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-019-1833-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.576..406S 576, 406

    2019 doi

  113. [121]

    C., Metzger B

    Stone N. C., Metzger B. D., Haiman Z., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2260 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464..946S 464, 946

    2017 doi

  114. [122]

    M., Tomida K., White C

    Stone J. M., Tomida K., White C. J., Felker K. G., 2020, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929b , 249, 4

    2020 doi

  115. [123]

    Suzuguchi T., Sugimura K., Hosokawa T., Matsumoto T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad34af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966....7S 966, 7

    2024 doi

  116. [124]

    L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11628.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377..459S 377, 459

    Sweatman W. L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11628.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377..459S 377, 459

    2007

  117. [125]

    Sz \"o lgy \'e n \'A ., Kocsis B., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.101101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.121j1101S 121, 101101

    2018 doi

  118. [126]

    Tagawa H., Umemura M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...47T 856, 47

    2018 doi

  119. [127]

    Tagawa H., Haiman Z., Kocsis B., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9b8c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...25T 898, 25

    doi

  120. [128]

    Tagawa H., Haiman Z., Bartos I., Kocsis B., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aba2cc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...899...26T 899, 26

    doi

  121. [129]

    Tagawa H., Haiman Z., Bartos I., Kocsis B., Omukai K., 2021a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.3362T 507, 3362

    doi

  122. [130]

    Tagawa H., Kocsis B., Haiman Z., Bartos I., Omukai K., Samsing J., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abd4d3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907L..20T 907, L20

    doi

  123. [131]

    A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741...82T 741, 82

    Thompson T. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741...82T 741, 82

    2011 doi

  124. [132]

    A., Quataert E., Murray N., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431923 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630..167T 630, 167

    Thompson T. A., Quataert E., Murray N., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431923 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630..167T 630, 167

    2005 doi

  125. [133]

    Toonen S., Hamers A., Portegies Zwart S., 2016, @doi [Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology] 10.1186/s40668-016-0019-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ComAC...3....6T 3, 6

    2016 doi

  126. [134]

    A., Spera M., Leigh N

    Trani A. A., Spera M., Leigh N. W. C., Fujii M. S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab480a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885..135T 885, 135

    2019 doi

  127. [135]

    A., Quaini S., Colpi M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347920 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.135T 683, A135

    Trani A. A., Quaini S., Colpi M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347920 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.135T 683, A135

    2024 doi

  128. [136]

    P., Mapelli M., P \'e rigois C., Barone D., Artale M

    Vaccaro M. P., Mapelli M., P \'e rigois C., Barone D., Artale M. C., Dall'Amico M., Iorio G., Torniamenti S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348509 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..51V 685, A51

    2024 doi

  129. [137]

    Valtonen M., Karttunen H., 2006, The Three-Body Problem

    2006

  130. [138]

    Varma V., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.191102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvL.128s1102V 128, 191102

    2022 doi

  131. [139]

    Venumadhav T., Zackay B., Roulet J., Dai L., Zaldarriaga M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvD.101h3030V 101, 083030

    2020 doi

  132. [140]

    Wang Y., Zhu Z., Lin D. N. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.4958W 528, 4958

    2024 doi

  133. [141]

    Whitehead H., Rowan C., Boekholt T., Kocsis B., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1430 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.4656W 531, 4656

    doi

  134. [142]

    Whitehead H., Rowan C., Boekholt T., Kocsis B., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1866 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.1766W 533, 1766

    doi

  135. [143]

    C., M \'a rka S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16e3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..122Y 876, 122

    Yang Y., Bartos I., Haiman Z., Kocsis B., M \'a rka Z., Stone N. C., M \'a rka S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16e3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..122Y 876, 122

    2019 doi

  136. [144]

    Zevin M., Samsing J., Rodriguez C., Haster C.-J., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6ec , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...91Z 871, 91

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.