Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Mining the time axis with TRON. I. Millisecond pulsars in Omega Centauri, Terzan 5 and 47 Tucanae detected through MeerKAT interferometric imaging

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A prototype pipeline called TRON recovers known eclipsing millisecond pulsars from archival MeerKAT images, demonstrating a blind image-plane search for minute-to-hour transients.

desk verdict TRON is a promising prototype with real detections of known MSPs, but the lack of a false-positive/injection test means the blind-search claim is not yet demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09488 v3 pith:RRZDP34W submitted 2025-01-16 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

Oleg M. Smirnov , Ian Heywood , Marisa Geyer , Talon Myburgh , Cyril Tasse , Jonathan S. Kenyon , Simon J. Perkins , James Dawson
show 8 more authors
Hertzog L. Bester Joe S. Bright Buntu Ngcebetsha Nadeem Oozeer Victoria G. G. Samboco Isaac Sihlangu Carmen Choza Andrew P. V. Siemion
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords radiotransientsmillisecondpulsarsglobularclustersimage-planetransientsearchMeerKATinterferometricimagingeclipsingtime-domainastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Medium-timescale radio transients that brighten and fade over minutes to hours are poorly surveyed because standard long-track synthesis imaging averages them away. This paper works to establish that archival MeerKAT synthesis observations can be re-mined for exactly this population: subtract the deep image model from the calibrated visibilities, image every 8-second integration, smooth the resulting time cube to a ladder of timescales, and flag peaks that stand above the local noise. The prototype pipeline, TRON, does this and, applied blindly to three globular clusters, recovers a known eclipsing 'black widow' millisecond pulsar (one with a low-mass companion) in $\Omega$ Centauri, a known 'red back' eclipsing pulsar (one with a more massive companion) in Terzan 5, and two known millisecond pulsars plus one previously reported candidate in 47 Tucanae. Dynamic spectra produced from the same interferometric data confirm that the detected variability is real eclipsing or scintillation, not an imaging artifact. If correct, this turns roughly six years of ordinary synthesis imaging already in the archive into a survey for minute-to-hour transients and variables.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a residual-image time cube. Before running TRON, the calibrated visibilities are differenced against model visibilities of a deep, full-track multi-frequency synthesis image, so that persistent source structure is removed; TRON then Fourier-transforms the residual visibilities into one snapshot image per 8-second integration without deconvolution, stacks the snapshots into a time cube, and smooths the cube to timescales of 15–960 seconds in powers of two. Detection is done by Breifast, a peak-finding algorithm that searches each smoothed cube against a local noise estimate at a $7\sigma$ threshold (reduced to $6\sigma$ at the two longest timescales) and applies a minimum 10 percent excursion relative to the deep-image flux, plus heuristics that reject primary beam rotation, residual calibration artifacts, and low-level radio interference. Source positions in the deep image are found with PyBDSF, and for candidates of interest TRON extracts light curves while DynSpecMS synthesizes frequency-time dynamic spectra at native resolution. The whole design hangs on one property: the residual visibilities are dominated by noise rather than unsubtracted source structure, so a fixed $\sigma$ threshold in the snapshots is a meaningful significance measure.

What would settle it

Inject synthetic point-source transients with known fluxes, positions, and timescales into the calibrated visibilities of one of these archival datasets before running TRON, then measure recovery fraction versus injected flux and timescale; alternatively run the default Breifast settings on residual positions in a field containing no known transients and count the $7\sigma$ candidates. If plausible injected sources are routinely lost or blank-sky positions produce comparable candidate rates, the claim that TRON is a blind search tool for medium-timescale transients is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a blind, image-plane search of routine MeerKAT synthesis data finds astrophysical variability on timescales that conventional long-track synthesis hides. TRON detects PSR J1326−4728B in $\Omega$ Centauri, the brightest millisecond pulsar in that cluster and a suspected black widow, on timescales of 60–960 seconds, with a mean-subtracted light curve showing repeated flux dips whose largely achromatic dynamic spectrum marks them as eclipses rather than scintillation; the light curve spans 11.5 hours and shows peaks separated by 0.75–1.9 hours, consistent with irregular eclipses around the known 2.15-hour orbit. In Terzan 5 it detects Terzan 5A on 120–480 second timescales, and its dynamic spectrum shows regular, mildly asymmetric eclipses matching the known 1.8-hour redback orbit. In 47 Tuc it detects MSPs C and J plus the candidate χ; the two confirmed pulsars show chromatic variability characteristic of scintillation while χ shows two broad peaks about four hours apart, a hint of eclipsing. The paper takes the match between these blind detections and independent pulsar timing and beamformer results as evidence that the method works.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that after subtracting the deep image model, the leftover visibility data are mostly noise, so the local noise level in each snapshot image is an honest error bar and a detection threshold of seven times that noise, plus the filtering heuristics, separates real astrophysical variability from calibration leftovers and radio interference; the paper states this but gives no quantitative false-positive-rate or injection-recovery test.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If TRON works as claimed, roughly six years of existing MeerKAT synthesis observations become a searchable sample for minute-to-hour transients and variables, with no new observing time required.
  • The detections in these three clusters demonstrate that eclipsing and scintillation are recoverable image-plane signatures, so pulsar searches need not rely solely on folded beamformed data.
  • The non-detection of the other twelve known eclipsing spider pulsars in these fields implies TRON's current sensitivity, set by snapshot noise after model subtraction, misses many such systems; the paper says a follow-up study will use this to refine the approach.
  • Adding a fine-grained search along the frequency axis, which the current wideband light curves wash out, should make the pipeline more sensitive to chromatic effects such as scintillation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because TRON is agnostic to the calibration workflow and works purely on residual image cubes, the same prototype should transfer to any archival MeerKAT field, not just globular clusters, where compact sources vary on similar timescales.
  • The sensitivity ceiling is set by how completely the deep image models the field, so fields with extended Galactic emission or bright confusing sources, like Terzan 5, will have higher false-positive floors; direction-dependent calibration or frequency-split residuals would likely improve completeness.
  • The four-hour spacing of the two broad peaks in candidate χ's dynamic spectrum, if real, is exactly the kind of signature a spider-pulsar binary would produce, making it a high-priority timing target.
  • A quantitative false-positive audit, running the same Breifast thresholds on off-source residual positions or on a field with no known transients, would turn TRON from a proof of concept into a calibrated survey instrument.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents TRON, a prototype image-plane transient and variability search pipeline for MeerKAT. The pipeline subtracts a deep model from calibrated visibilities, images the residuals at 8-second cadence, smooths the resulting cubes to timescales of 15 to 960 seconds, and detects candidates with a peak-finding algorithm (Breifast) using a 7-sigma threshold (6 at the longest timescales) plus heuristic filters. Applied to archival observations of Omega Centauri, Terzan 5, and 47 Tucanae, the pipeline recovers the known eclipsing MSPs PSR J1326-4728B and Terzan 5A, two known MSPs in 47 Tuc, and the previously reported candidate 'chi' from Heywood (2023). Light curves and dynamic spectra are shown to be consistent with established eclipsing and scintillation behavior. The paper frames this as a proof of concept for systematic mining of archival MeerKAT synthesis images.

Significance. If the pipeline performs as claimed, this is a valuable proof of concept for blind medium-timescale transient searches in MeerKAT synthesis images. The main strengths are the positional cross-identification with known pulsars, the consistency of the extracted light curves and dynamic spectra with established eclipsing behavior, and the independent confirmation of Terzan 5A's eclipses against contemporaneous beamformer data. The pipeline is largely calibration-agnostic and the data are public, so the result is checkable. The paper is appropriately cautious in calling TRON a prototype and in deferring full technical details to a follow-up paper. Its significance is as a demonstration that per-integration residual imaging can recover variability signatures of individual MSPs, motivating further technical development and archival mining.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 2, 'Detection of candidates using Breifast'] The central claim that TRON is a blind search tool suitable for systematic archival mining is not supported by a quantitative false-positive-rate measurement or an injection/recovery test. Section 2 states that the 7-sigma threshold and heuristic filters 'served to exclude any false-positives' induced by primary beam rotation, calibration residuals, and RFI, but no candidate statistics are reported: the reader cannot tell how many peaks passed the filters, how many were rejected, or how many did not coincide with known sources. Because all three fields were selected because they host known MSPs, the positional coincidences demonstrate sensitivity to bright known variables but do not constrain the false-positive rate on blank sky. This is load-bearing because the abstract's statement that TRON can 'systematically mine archival synthesis imaging data' presumes that the heuristic filters control artifacts; without a measurement, the reported detection significances (7-sigma/6-sigma with respect to local r.m.s.) are only upper limits on true astrophysical significance. I request at least one of: an end-to-end injection/recovery test into the residual visibilities, a measurement of the candidate rate in the same fields after time-ordering is scrambled, or an explicit statement that the false-positive rate has not yet been established and that TRON is currently a sensitivity demonstration rather than a fully validated blind search.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3 and Figure 8 (bottom panel)] The interpretation of candidate 'chi' as showing 'hints of eclipsing behaviour' is somewhat stronger than the evidence supports. The two broad peaks separated by about 4 hours appear in a dynamic spectrum of a cluster known to be scintillating (DM about 24 pc cm^-3), and no orbital ephemeris or eclipse-phased profile is presented. Please soften this to 'quasi-periodic variability of unknown origin' or state explicitly that the 4-hour separation is only suggestive and could be a scintillation timescale.
  2. [Section 2, 'Smoothing'] The timescale grid is described as '15 s to 960 s in successive increments of x2'; listing the explicit values (15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 480, 960 s) would remove ambiguity about whether the last step from 480 to 960 is a doubling.
  3. [Section 3.1, Figure 2 caption] The caption states that 'Four-sigma deviations are indicated in red' while the detection threshold is 7-sigma; clarify why the light-curve plot uses a 4-sigma display threshold and how this relates to the Breifast detection threshold.
  4. [Section 3.3, Table 1] The variability metrics V, eta, and xi_max are taken from Heywood (2023, 2024) but are not defined in this paper; a one-sentence definition or a reference to the equation numbers in those papers would help the reader interpret Table 1.
  5. [Section 4, Conclusions] The phrase 'blind detections' in the 47 Tuc paragraph is misleading because all three sources were already reported in the literature (two known MSPs and one candidate from Heywood 2023) and were in a field selected for its known MSP population. Suggest replacing 'blind' with 'unsupervised' or 'pipeline-based' in this context.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: TRON's detections are externally validated against known MSPs; pipeline thresholds and variability metrics are not fitted to the targets, so the central claim does not reduce to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the TRON pipeline can blindly detect medium-timescale transients and variables in archival MeerKAT imaging data. Walking the derivation chain, the detections are produced from residual visibility data after deep-image model subtraction, followed by per-integration imaging and a peak-finding heuristic with a fixed 7-sigma default threshold. No parameter is fitted to the detected sources: the targets were already known in the literature (PSR J1326-4728B, Terzan 5A, PSRs J0024-7204C/J, and the Heywood 2023 candidate), so the detections serve as external benchmarks rather than outputs forced by construction. The paper's self-citations (Smirnov et al. 2024a for HTC imaging and dynamic spectra, Heywood 2023/2024 for variability metric definitions, Smirnov et al. 2024b for Stimela, Tasse et al. 2025 for DynSpecMS) are tool/method references and are not load-bearing for the detection claim: the variability metrics are computed after detection and are explicitly said to be secondary to the peak-finding heuristics, and the known-source recoveries are compared against independent pulsar-timing and beamformer results. There is no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation to force the chosen detections. The absence of a quantitative false-positive-rate test or injection/recovery test is a genuine validation limitation, but it is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity: the absence of a test does not make the detections equivalent to the pipeline's inputs. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be quoted, and the internal circularity burden is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the detection thresholds, the residual-noise assumption, and the calibration quality. No new physical entities are introduced. The hand-chosen thresholds are not fitted, but they set the sensitivity and could hide a biased false-positive rate.

free parameters (3)
  • Breifast peak detection threshold = 7 sigma, decreasing to 6 sigma at the longest two timescales
    Hand-chosen default; controls sensitivity and false-positive rate; not fitted to the data.
  • Minimum flux excursion = 10%
    Hand-chosen to reject primary beam rotation and residual artefacts; directly influences which candidates survive.
  • Smoothing timescale grid = 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 480, 960 s
    Fixed x2 increments; defines the timescales at which variability is searched; a tunable default setting.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Local image r.m.s. is a valid estimate of snapshot noise after model subtraction.
    The 7 sigma threshold and the light-curve error bars (computed as local image rms) rely on this; cited in Sect. 2 and Fig. 2 caption.
  • domain assumption Subtracting the deep MFS image model does not remove the time-variable signal of interest.
    TRON images residual visibilities, so any source whose variability is absorbed into the deep model would be missed; the paper notes detectability is driven by completeness of the subtracted model (Sect. 2).
  • domain assumption The manual calibration of Terzan 5 using the secondary calibrator yields a valid flux scale and phase solutions.
    The primary calibrator scans were corrupted, and the authors state variability of the calibrator cannot be ruled out (Sect. 2); if the flux scale is wrong, the measured variability could be affected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mining the time axis with TRON. I. Millisecond pulsars in Omega Centauri, Terzan 5 and 47 Tucanae detected through MeerKAT interferometric imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRZDP34W

@misc{pith2026250109488,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mining the time axis with TRON. I. Millisecond pulsars in Omega Centauri, Terzan 5 and 47 Tucanae detected through MeerKAT interferometric imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRZDP34W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09488}
}
read the original abstract

Medium-timescale (minutes to hours) radio transients are a relatively unexplored population. The wide field-of-view and high instantaneous sensitivity of instruments such as MeerKAT provides an opportunity to probe this class of sources, using image-plane detection techniques. We aim to systematically mine archival synthesis imaging data in order to search for medium-timescale transients and variables that are not detected by conventional long-track image synthesis techniques. We deploy a prototype blind transient and variable search pipeline named TRON. This processes calibrated visibility data, constructs high-time cadence images, performs a search for variability on multiple timescales, and extracts lightcurves for detected sources. As proof of concept, we apply it to three MeerKAT observations of globular clusters, known to host transient or variable sources. We detect a previously known eclipsing MSP suspected to be a `black widow' system, in the globular cluster Omega Centauri, with a light curve confirming the eclipsing nature of the emission. We detect a previously known `red back' eclipsing MSP in the globular cluster Terzan 5. Using observations of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae, we detect two known millisecond pulsars (MSPs), and one previously reported MSP candidate, with hints of eclipsing behaviour.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09488 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean-subtracted lightcurve for PSR J1326−4728B, at 480 s smoothing. Error bars (computed as the local image rms) are plotted in light blue. Four-sigma deviations are indicated in red, with light red error bars [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. L-band dynamic spectrum for PSR J1326−4728B, smoothed to 900 s and 40 MHz. The FWHM of the Gaussian smoothing kernel is indicated in the top right of the plot. et al. 2018). Dai et al. (2020) report an orbital period of 2.15 hr as measured from pulsar timing solutions, and describe the eclipses as “irregular in duration”. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The MeerKAT image of Terzan 5 at 1.28 GHz, with the TRON detection of Terzan 5A (J1748−2446A) indicated. The circular Gaussian restoring beam used in this image has a FWHM of 6. ′′1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: displays regular eclipsing behaviour on the anticipated or￾bital time scale of ∼1.8 h. Interestingly, however, Terzan 5A is known to exhibit eclipses of irregular durations between observing epochs, and at times even showcases additional short duration eclipses (or ‘mi…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mean-subtracted lightcurves for the three TRON detections in 47 Tuc, at 480 s smoothing. Top: MSP ‘J’, middle: MSP ‘C’, bottom: MSP candidate ‘𝜒’. Error bars (computed as the local image rms) are plotted in light blue. Four-sigma deviations are indicated in red, with l…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The MeerKAT image of 47 Tuc at 1.28 GHz, with the three TRON detections indicated. The top two objects are known MSPs, while the bottom object is the MSP candidate reported by Heywood (2023). The fitted Gaussian restoring beam in this image is 6. ′′9 × 6. ′′2 (PA = 54.…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: L-band dynamic spectra for the three TRON detections in 47 Tuc, smoothed to 600 s and 35 MHz. Top: MSP ‘J’, middle: MSP ‘C’, bottom: MSP candidate ‘𝜒’. tion of a known red back eclipsing pulsar, Terzan 5A. The dynamic spectrum we obtained shows eclipsing behaviour comp…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Pulsars in Globular Clusters With the SKAO

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    SKA-MID and SKA-LOW are predicted to discover 150–1700 new pulsars in Galactic globular clusters, more than doubling the current population of 345.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Abbate F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.1642A 518, 1642

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3248 2023

  3. [3]

    C., Ransom S

    Andersen B. C., Ransom S. M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aad59f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863L..13A 863, L13

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad59f 2018

  4. [4]

    Andersson A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.3482A 513, 3482

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1002 2022

  5. [5]

    Andersson A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.2219A 523, 2219

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1298 2023

  6. [6]

    V., Ransom S

    Bilous A. V., Ransom S. M., Demorest P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16dd , 877, 125

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab16dd 2019

  7. [7]

    E., van den Berg M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/432249 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630.1029B 630, 1029

    Bogdanov S., Grindlay J. E., van den Berg M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/432249 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630.1029B 630, 1029

    work page doi:10.1086/432249 2005

  8. [8]

    O., Freire P

    Bogdanov S., Bahramian A., Heinke C. O., Freire P. C. C., Hessels J. W. T., Ransom S. M., Stairs I. H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abee78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912..124B 912, 124

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abee78 2021

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    R., et al., 2021, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039144 , 648, A13

    Callingham J. R., et al., 2021, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039144 , 648, A13

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    R., Freire P., Lyne A

    Camilo F., Lorimer D. R., Freire P., Lyne A. G., Manchester R. N., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308859 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...535..975C 535, 975

    2000 doi

  3. [11]

    I., van der Horst A

    Chastain S. I., van der Horst A. J., Rowlinson A., Rhodes L., Andersson A., Diretse R., Fender R. P., Woudt P. A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2714 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.1888C 526, 1888

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Chen W., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad029 , 520, 3847

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Czech D., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/abf329 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASP..133f4502C 133, 064502

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Dai S., Johnston S., Kerr M., Camilo F., Cameron A., Toomey L., Kumamoto H., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab621a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...888L..18D 888, L18

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Dai S., Johnston S., Kerr M., Berteaud J., Bhattacharyya B., Camilo F., Keane E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad704 , 521, 2616–2622

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Dobie D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3731 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.4684D 519, 4684

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    N., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491..560D 491, 560

    Driessen L. N., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491..560D 491, 560

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    N., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac756 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.5037D 512, 5037

    Driessen L. N., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac756 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.5037D 512, 5037

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    N., Sarkissian J., Lyne A

    D’Amico N., Possenti A., Manchester R. N., Sarkissian J., Lyne A. G., Camilo F., 2001, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/324562 , 561, L89–L92

    2001 doi

  12. [20]

    D., Gilliland R

    Edmonds P. D., Gilliland R. L., Camilo F., Heinke C. O., Grindlay J. E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342985 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...579..741E 579, 741

    2002 doi

  13. [21]

    Fijma S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae382 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.6985F 528, 6985

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    C., Camilo F., Lorimer D

    Freire P. C., Camilo F., Lorimer D. R., Lyne A. G., Manchester R. N., D'Amico N., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04493.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.326..901F 326, 901

    2001

  15. [23]

    C., Camilo F., Kramer M., Lorimer D

    Freire P. C., Camilo F., Kramer M., Lorimer D. R., Lyne A. G., Manchester R. N., D'Amico N., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06392.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340.1359F 340, 1359

    2003

  16. [24]

    Freire P. C. C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1533 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471..857F 471, 857

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    R., Heinke C

    Hebbar P. R., Heinke C. O., Kandel D., Romani R. W., Freire P. C. C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3072 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1139H 500, 1139

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Haggard D., Heinke C., Callanan P., Zhao Y., 2018, , 479, 2834

    Henleywillis S., Cool A. M., Haggard D., Heinke C., Callanan P., Zhao Y., 2018, , 479, 2834

    2018

  19. [27]

    Heywood I., 2020, oxkat: Semi-automated imaging of MeerKAT observations , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2009.003

    2020

  20. [28]

    Heywood I., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525L..76H 525, L76

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Heywood I., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae075 , 534, L21

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Heywood I., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.2150H 509, 2150

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    P., 2023, Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, University Ave, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700

    Lekomola S. P., 2023, Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, University Ave, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700

    2023

  24. [32]

    Li D., Bilous A., Ransom S., Main R., Yang Y.-P., 2023, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-023-05983-z , 618, 484–488

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    G., et al., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1038/347650a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990Natur.347..650L 347, 650

    Lyne A. G., et al., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1038/347650a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990Natur.347..650L 347, 650

    1990 doi

  26. [34]

    G., Mankelow S

    Lyne A. G., Mankelow S. H., Bell J. F., Manchester R. N., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03517.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.316..491L 316, 491

    2000

  27. [35]

    R., Mol J

    Malenta M., et al., 2020, in Pizzo R., Deul E. R., Mol J. D., de Plaa J., Verkouter H., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 527, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. p. 457

    2020

  28. [36]

    N., Lyne A

    Manchester R. N., Lyne A. G., Robinson C., D'Amico N., Bailes M., Lim J., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1038/352219a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991Natur.352..219M 352, 219

    1991 doi

  29. [37]

    R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941...22M 941, 22

    Martsen A. R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941...22M 941, 22

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    Mohan N., Rafferty D., 2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1502.007 ( @eprint ascl 1502.007 )

    2015

  31. [39]

    J., Arzoumanian Z., Thorsett S

    Nice D. J., Arzoumanian Z., Thorsett S. E., 2000, in Kramer M., Wex N., Wielebinski R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 202, IAU Colloq. 177: Pulsar Astronomy - 2000 and Beyond. p. 67 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9911211 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro...

    2000 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.166P 686, A166

    Padmanabh P. V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.166P 686, A166

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Pan Z., Hobbs G., Li D., Ridolfi A., Wang P., Freire P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459L..26P 459, L26

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    J., Ransom S

    Prager B. J., Ransom S. M., Freire P. C. C., Hessels J. W. T., Stairs I. H., Arras P., Cadelano M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ed7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...845..148P 845, 148

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    J., Bryant J

    Rajwade K., et al., 2020, in Evans C. J., Bryant J. J., Motohara K., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 11447, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VIII. p. 114470J ( @eprint arXiv 2103.08410 ), @doi 10.1117...

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    M., Hessels J

    Ransom S. M., Hessels J. W. T., Stairs I. H., Freire P. C. C., Camilo F., Kaspi V. M., Kaplan D. L., 2005, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1108632 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Sci...307..892R 307, 892

    2005 doi

  37. [45]

    Ridolfi A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1850 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.2918R 462, 2918

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    Ridolfi A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab790 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.1407R 504, 1407

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    G., Manchester R

    Robinson C., Lyne A. G., Manchester R. N., Bailes M., D'Amico N., Johnston S., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/274.2.547 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995MNRAS.274..547R 274, 547

    1995 doi

  40. [48]

    M., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.6517S 528, 6517

    Smirnov O. M., et al., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.6517S 528, 6517

    doi

  41. [49]

    M., Makhathini S., Kenyon J

    Smirnov O. M., Makhathini S., Kenyon J. S., Bester H. L., Perkins S. J., Ramaila A. J. T., Hugo B. V., 2024b, Astronomy and Computing, submitted, arXiv:2412.10080

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Tasse C., et al., 2025, Nature, submitted

    2025

  43. [51]

    Urquhart R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb6fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904..147U 904, 147

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    Wang Y., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1727 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.5661W 523, 5661

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    P., et al., 2017, @doi [Acta Astronautica] 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.008 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AcAau.139...98W 139, 98

    Worden S. P., et al., 2017, @doi [Acta Astronautica] 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.008 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AcAau.139...98W 139, 98

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    S., Rowlinson A., Shimwell T

    de Ruiter I., Meyers Z. S., Rowlinson A., Shimwell T. W., Ruhe D., Wijers R. A. M. J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1458 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.4805D 531, 4805

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.