G-functions, motives, and unlikely intersections -- old and new

Yves Andr\'e

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

G-functions, motives, and unlikely intersections -- old and new

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The G-function method turns extra fiber symmetries into height bounds on exceptional parameters, powering new cases of the Andre-Oort and Zilber-Pink conjectures.

desk verdict A candid survey of the G-function method, self-correcting about the author's earlier work, but with the p-adic step resting on an unpublished theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09867 v1 pith:E5LFD2ZB submitted 2025-01-16 math.NT math.AG

Yves André This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NTmath.AG MSC 11J8111G5014D0711G18

keywords G-functionsG-operatorsPicard-FuchsequationsperiodsglobalrelationsAndre-OortconjectureZilber-Pinkp-adic

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that G-functions—power series with number-field coefficients that satisfy linear differential equations—carry the arithmetic of families of algebraic varieties: the period matrix of a pencil, normalized at a base point, is a matrix of G-functions. When a fiber acquires extra motivic symmetries, the resulting period relations become polynomial relations between special values of G-functions at that parameter, and the principle of global relations bounds the height of such parameters by a polynomial in the degree of the relation. The paper shows that this G-function method, extended to p-adic places via p-adic periods, feeds the Pila-Zannier strategy and yields proofs of cases of the Andre-Oort and Zilber-Pink conjectures for Hodge-generic curves whose closures meet the boundary. Because it supplies height bounds, the method goes beyond finiteness statements and makes the exceptional parameters quantitatively controlled.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the G-function: a formal power series $\sum a_n z^n$ with coefficients in a number field that satisfies a linear differential equation with polynomial coefficients, while the conjugates of the $a_n$ and their denominators grow at most exponentially. The G-operator is the minimal differential operator it satisfies, characterized by the condition that the product of its $p$-adic radii of convergence at the generic disk be nonzero. The key mechanism is the principle of global relations: a homogeneous polynomial relation among G-values at $\zeta$ that holds at all places $v$ with $|\zeta|_v < \min(1, R_v(g))$ and is exceptional—not obtainable by specializing a relation among the G-functions—forces the height of $\zeta$ to grow at most polynomially in the degree of the relation. In the geometric setting, period relations at a fiber with extra motivic symmetries are converted into such global G-value relations, and in the p-adic setting, quotients of M0-periods by $t_p^n$ play the role of $2\pi i$.

What would settle it

For a sequence of complex-multiplication parameters $\zeta_d$ of bounded degree in the Legendre elliptic pencil, compute the minimal degree $\delta_d$ of a global relation between the two relevant M0-G-functions; the principle of global relations predicts $h(\zeta_d)$ grows at most polynomially in $\delta_d$, so a super-polynomial ratio would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that exceptional parameters—points where the fiber of a smooth algebraic family has smaller motivic Galois group than the general fiber—force polynomial relations among G-values that are global in Bombieri's sense: they hold at essentially every place where the values converge, without specializing from relations among the G-functions themselves. The principle of global relations then bounds the absolute logarithmic height of such parameters polynomially in the degree of the relation, so the bounded-degree exceptional points are finite. The paper further reports that the p-adic analogue, built from p-adic periods and graph-theoretic homology, holds in the setting of multiplicative reduction, and that this extension removes earlier simplicity and parity assumptions, producing new cases of Andre-Oort and Zilber-Pink for Hodge-generic curves in $A_g$, $A_2$, $Y(1)^n$, and $M_g$.

Load-bearing premise

The p-adic half of the narrative depends on a preprint's graph-theoretic homology construction and on an unpublished assertion that every period is a G-value; if either has a gap, the p-adic extension of the G-function method loses support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bounded-degree exceptional parameters in any family covered by the method are finite; this is the concrete finiteness statement that the method proves.
The absolute logarithmic height of such parameters grows at most polynomially with the degree of the relation, which is exactly the bound the Pila-Zannier method needs to control Galois orbits.
For Hodge-generic curves in $A_g$ with $g > 1$ whose closure meets the boundary infinity, Andre-Oort holds; for Hodge-generic curves in $A_2$, the intersection with the union of special curves is finite.
In a product $Y(1)^n$ of modular curves, Hodge-generic curves meeting infinity have finite intersection with the union of special subvarieties of codimension at least two.
In $M_g$, the set of points whose Jacobian has a CM isogeny factor is finite along Hodge-generic curves with suitable boundary degeneration, and analogous atypical intersection statements hold in variations of Hodge structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural testable extension is to make the height bound explicit in the geometric parameters such as genus, degree of the family, and number of places; the survey notes the principle is effective in principle but does not spell out the constant, and uniform bounds would yield effective forms of Andre-Oort for boundary-meeting curves.
The same mechanism should apply to period domains or Shimura varieties beyond $A_g$, once p-adic period structures with integral M0-parts are constructed; the examples in the paper suggest the bottleneck is geometric rather than diophantine.
If the unpublished assertion that every period is a G-value and the preprint's graph-theoretic homology construction both hold, then the gap between period relations and G-value relations closes, and the Bombieri-Dwork conjecture becomes the main remaining obstruction to pushing the method to all period relations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

Claim #1: The central claim is that exceptional parameters—points where the fiber of a smooth algebraic family has smaller motivic Galois group than the general fiber—force polynomial relations among G-values that are global in Bombieri's sense: they hold at essentially every place where the values converge, without specializing from relations among the G-functions themselves. The principle of global relati

/-- @claim 1 The central claim is that exceptional parameters—points where the fiber of a smooth algebraic family has smaller motivic Galois group than the general fiber—force polynomial relations among G-values that are global in Bombieri's sense: they hold at essentially every place where the values converge, without specializing from relations among the G-functions themselves. The principle of global relati -/
def central_claim : Prop :=

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a survey, not a research paper, and it should be judged as one. What it does well: it gives a clear, historically grounded map of the G-function method, from Siegel and Bombieri through the author's 1989 book to the recent Zilber-Pink applications. The structural thread—M0-G-functions as quotients of M0-periods, then Bombieri's global relations, then Pila-Zannier—is explained with real sophistication. The author is also unusually candid about his own earlier work: he states that Problem 2 in [2, X §4.4] has a negative answer, that the appendix in [2] is flawed, and that one proof relied on unpublished Raynaud results. That kind of self-correction is valuable and rare.

The soft spots are real but mostly in the nature of the genre. The survey's central narrative for the p-adic extension of the method depends on Urbanik's Theorem 1.14 (arXiv:2301.01857), a preprint, and on Fresan's unpublished claim that every period is a G-value. The author does flag the p-adic step as delicate in 3.3.4, and the dependence on Urbanik's graph-theoretic homology is explicit. So the manuscript is not hiding its reliance; but it does mean that the survey's account of the p-adic global-relations step is only as solid as that preprint. For a reader wanting to verify the height-bound claims, this is a limitation.

Also worth saying: the paper adds no new mathematics, which is fine for a survey, but it means 'significance' here is about the usefulness of the map, not about new results. I found the discussion of the boundary condition (bad reduction at infinity) and the open question about good reduction in 3.3.4 the most useful part for a newcomer.

Who is this for? Anyone entering the G-function method or wanting a reliable orientation to the recent Daw-Orr, Urbanik, Papas results. It deserves a serious referee: a survey by a leading figure with explicit corrections to his own earlier work should be refereed, not desk-rejected. My only advice to the editor is to ask the referee to check the Urbanik dependence and to ensure the survey does not overstate what has been proved.

Yes, send it to review.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey of the arithmetic theory of G-functions and its applications to unlikely intersections. It begins by recalling Siegel's G-functions, Bombieri's condition, G-operators, and the Bombieri--Dwork conjecture on geometric origin. It then explains the link between functional periods of a pencil and G-values, including the M0-versions attached to the monodromy-weight filtration, and Bombieri's principle of global relations. The second half describes recent applications: the G-function method yields height bounds for exceptional points, and combined with the Pila--Zannier method this has produced new proofs of cases of the Andr\'e--Oort and Zilber--Pink conjectures due to Daw--Orr, Urbanik, and Papas. The survey also explicitly corrects several statements in the author's earlier monograph [2].

Significance. The survey is well written and fills a useful role by explaining the logical architecture of the G-function method in one place, from period relations to G-value relations to global relations and finally to height bounds. Its self-critical character is a strength: the author flags errors in his earlier work and rephrases old problems in view of more recent results. If the surveyed preprints are correct, the narrative will be a valuable guide to a rapidly developing area. However, the central p-adic step that underlies the new height bounds is supported only by the unpublished preprint of Urbanik and, through footnote 9, by unpublished results of Raynaud; the survey's factual account of recent applications therefore carries a dependence on work that has not yet passed independent scrutiny.

major comments (1)

[Section 3.3.2] The statement that the p-adic counterpart is 'established by D. Urbanik [38, Th. 1.14]' and the subsequent display 'Fact: M0-G-functions are quotients of M0-periods by t_p^n' present as a theorem a result that, according to the bibliography, has only appeared as a preprint (arXiv:2301.01857). The proof also relies on unpublished results of Raynaud, as the text itself acknowledges in footnote 9. Since the height bounds for exceptional points in Section 3.3.3 (Daw--Orr, Urbanik, Papas) are the central new applications described in the survey and depend directly on this p-adic step, the manuscript should explicitly qualify the status of these results (e.g., 'announced by Urbanik in a preprint') and state the precise hypotheses of Urbanik's Theorem 1.14, or at least indicate whether the theorem has been independently verified. As written, the reader cannot distinguish established theorems from preprint claims in the load-bearing part of the narrative.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3.2.3] There is a duplicated word in 'extra motivic motivic symmetries'; it should read 'extra motivic symmetries'.
[Section 3.3.5] The 'Pila--Wilkie counting theorem' is invoked without a reference; a citation should be added.
[Section 3.3.2, footnote 8] The remark that 'actually Urbanik proceeds a little differently in obtaining and applying his result' is vague; one sentence indicating the difference would help the reader.
[Section 1.2] The condition introduced by A. Galochkin is mentioned without a bibliographic reference; a citation would be helpful for readers wishing to trace the original statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the G-function method's steps are attributed to established theorems (Bombieri, Ayoub, Urbanik, Daw-Orr, Papas); the author's self-citations are to peer-reviewed published work, and he explicitly corrects his own earlier gaps — preprint dependence is a reliability risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and constructs no original derivation chain that could reduce to its inputs. The central narrative — extra motivic symmetries yield period relations, elimination gives G-value relations, Bombieri's global-relations principle gives height bounds, and Pila-Zannier converts these into André-Oort/Zilber-Pink cases — is attributed step by step to external sources: Bombieri [13, §11] for the principle, Ayoub [9][10] for functional-period reduction, and Urbanik [38, Th. 1.14], Daw-Orr [19][20], and Papas [34] for the p-adic and application steps. The author's self-citations ([2], [3], [6]) are to peer-reviewed, published work; the 'Fact' that M0-G-functions are quotients of M0-periods by (2πi)^n (Section 2.3.2) is stated as a theorem in [2, IX] ('We refer to [2, IX, Th. 2 and 1, §4] for precise definitions, statements and proofs'), not a definition of M0-G-functions in terms of M0-periods, so no step is self-definitional, and Bombieri's principle is a genuine theorem rather than a restatement of the definition of 'global relation'. The manuscript itself flags its weak points: Fresán's 'any period is a G-value' is marked 'unpublished' (Section 2.2); footnote 9 discloses that the earlier p-adic Betti-lattice formalism relied on 'unpublished results by Raynaud'; footnote 12 corrects errors in [2, X app.] — explicit self-correction, the opposite of circular self-support. The load-bearing dependence of the p-adic global-relations step on Urbanik's preprint Theorem 1.14 and on Daw-Orr/Papas preprints is a correctness and verification risk for the survey's factual narrative, not a circularity: no equation in the paper equals its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Since the survey is self-contained in its attributions against external benchmarks, the circularity score is 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey leans on standard theorems (Chudnovsky, Bombieri, Urbanik) and frames open conjectures (Bombieri-Dwork, Grothendieck period, Kontsevich-Zagier). No free parameters or invented entities appear, as the paper is expository.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Bombieri-Dwork conjecture: differential operators of geometric origin are G-operators, and conversely.
The survey's narrative uses this conjecture to motivate G-operators (Section 1.2), though none of the stated finiteness theorems depend on it.
domain assumption Grothendieck's period conjecture: all algebraic relations among periods are motivic.
Invoked in Section 2.3.1 as the framework for why extra motivic symmetries produce period relations.
domain assumption Kontsevich-Zagier conjecture: equality of periods is decidable and all relations come from symmetries.
Mentioned in Section 2.1 as the arithmetic counterpart of the functional case settled by Ayoub.
standard math Urbanik's theorem (arXiv:2301.01857, Th. 1.14): p-adic M0-G-functions are quotients of M0-periods by t_p^n.
Load-bearing for the p-adic extensions in Section 3.3.2; cited as a preprint, not yet journal-refereed at time of writing.
standard math Chudnovsky's theorem: the minimal operator killing a G-function is a G-operator.
Used in Section 1.2 to justify that G-functions are governed by G-operators.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of G-functions, motives, and unlikely intersections -- old and new." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5LFD2ZB

@misc{pith2026250109867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: G-functions, motives, and unlikely intersections -- old and new},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5LFD2ZB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09867}
}

read the original abstract

In this survey, we outline the role of G-functions in arithmetic geometry, notably their link with Picard-Fuchs differential equations and periods. We explain how polynomial relations between special values of G-functions arising from a pencil of algebraic varieties may occur at a parameter where the fiber has more ``motivic" symmetries; and how Bombieri's principle of global relations can be used to control the height of such parameters (which was also one of the origins of the Andr\'e-Oort conjecture). At the end, we sketch the recent revival of the G-function method in the context of unlikely intersections and the Zilber-Pink conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

On Siegel's problem and Dwork's conjecture for $G$-functions
math.NT 2025-02 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

G-functions of order two exist that are not polynomial expressions in algebraic pullbacks of hypergeometric functions, answering Siegel's problem negatively and adding counterexamples to Dwork's conjecture.
What makes an algebraic curve special?
math.AG 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

A survey of special curves and special subvarieties of moduli space, unifying Hodge-theoretic, Teichmüller, and bi-algebraic perspectives, with a few new results and conjectures.
Unlikely intersections in Shimura varieties and beyond: a survey
math.NT 2025-06 accept

A survey of unlikely intersections in pure Shimura varieties, covering Andre-Oort, Andre-Pink-Zannier, Zilber-Pink, and the Pila-Zannier strategy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[2]

Aspects of Mathematics E13, Vieweg, Braun- schweig (1989)

Andr´ e Y .,G-functions and geometry . Aspects of Mathematics E13, Vieweg, Braun- schweig (1989)

work page 1989
[1]

Ancona G., Fratila G., Algebraic classes in mixed charac teristic and Andr´ e’sp-adic periods, preprint arXiv:2207.09213 (2022)

arXiv 2022
[3]

Trento conf

Andr´ e Y .,p-adic Betti lattices, in p-adic analysis, Proc. Trento conf. onp-adic analysis, Springer L. N. 1454 (1990), 23-63

work page 1990
[4]

Andr´ e Y ., Th´ eorie des motifs et interpr´ etation g´ eom´ etrique des valeursp-adiques de G-functions (une introduction), in Number theory (Paris, 1992–1993) , London Math. Soc. L. N. 215, Cambridge Univ. Press (1995), 37-60

work page 1995
[5]

Andr´ e Y ., G-functions and transcendence, J.Reine Angew. Math. 476 (1996), 95-125

work page 1996
[6]

From C to Cp

Andr´ e Y .,Period mappings and differential equations. From C to Cp. MSJ Memoir 12 (2003)

work page 2003
[7]

1104 in S´eminaire Bourbaki 2015/2016, Ast´ erisque 390 (2017)

Andr´ e Y ., Groupes de Galois motiviques et p´ eriodes, Exp. 1104 in S´eminaire Bourbaki 2015/2016, Ast´ erisque 390 (2017)

work page 2017
[8]

Andr´ e Y ., Baldassarri F., Geometric theory of G-functi ons, in Arithmetic Geometry , Symp. Math. XXXVII, Cambridge Univ. Press, (1997)

work page 1997

Show all 39 references

[9]

A youb J., Une version relative de la conjecture des p´ eri odes de Kontsevich-Zagier, Ann. of Math. 181, 3 (2015), 905-992

2015
[10]

A youb J., Periods and the conjectures of Grothendieck a nd Kontsevich-Zagier, EMS Newsletter 91 (2014), 12-18

2014
[11]

Bakker B., Tsimerman J., Functional transcendence of p eriods and the geometric Andr´ e-Grothendieck period conjecture, preprint arXiv:2208.05182 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[12]

Math´ ematique 359, no.3 (2021), 313-321

Binyamini G., Masser D., Effective Andr´ e–Oort for non -compact curves in Hilbert modular varieties, Comptes Rendus. Math´ ematique 359, no.3 (2021), 313-321

2021
[13]

Bombieri E., On G-functions, in Recent progress in analytic number theory , 2 (Durham 1979), 1-67, Academic press (1981)

1981
[14]

Bombieri E., Masser D., Zannier U., Intersecting a curv e with algebraic subgroups of multiplicative groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. 20 (1999), 1119 -1140

1999
[15]

Cadoret A., Sp´ ecialisations des cycles motiv´ es, inTh´eories de Galois g ´eom´etrique et diff´erentielle, S´ eminaires et Congr` es (2013) SMF

2013
[16]

of Algebra 412 (2014), 189-206

Cadoret A., Tamagawa A., Controlling the Galois images in one-dimensional families of ℓ-adic representations, J. of Algebra 412 (2014), 189-206. 15a test bench could be Schneider’s problem: to prove, without using elliptic functions , that for a non-CM elliptic curve deﬁned ov...

2014
[17]

Calegari F., Dimitrov V ., Tang Y ., The linear independence of 1, ζ(2) and L(2, χ− 3), preprint arXiv:2408.15403 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[18]

1032 in S´eminaire Bourbaki 2010/2011 , Ast´ erisque 348 (2012)

Chambert-Loir A., Relations de d´ ependance et interse ctions exceptionnelles, Exp. 1032 in S´eminaire Bourbaki 2010/2011 , Ast´ erisque 348 (2012)

2012
[19]

Daw C., Orr M., The large Galois orbits conjecture under multiplicative degeneration, preprint arXiv:2306.13463 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[20]

Daw C., Orr M., Zilber-Pink in a product of modular curve s assuming multiplicative degeneration, preprint arXiv:2208.06338, (2022)

2022 arXiv
[21]

Annalen 319 (2001), 181-213

Di Vizio L., Sur la th´ eorie g´ eom´ etrique des G-fonctions (Le th´ eor` eme de Chudnovsky ` a plusieurs variables), Math. Annalen 319 (2001), 181-213

2001
[22]

Studies 133, Princeton Univ

Dwork B., Gerotto G., Sullivan F., An introduction to G-functions , Annals of Math. Studies 133, Princeton Univ. Press (1994)

1994
[23]

IV , Ency- clopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol

Feldman N., Nesterenko Y u., Transcendental Numbers, i n Number theory. IV , Ency- clopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 44, Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 1998

1998
[24]

Fres´ an J., Une introduction aux p´ eriodes, inP´eriodes et transcendance, Ed. ´Ec. Poly- tech., Palaiseau, (2024)

2024
[25]

Habegger P ., Pila J., Some unlikely intersections beyond Andr´ e–Oort, Compos. Math. 148 (2012), 1–27

2012
[26]

Huber A., W¨ ustholz G., Transcendence and linear relat ions of 1-periods, Cambridge tract 227 (2022), Cambridge Univ. Press

2022
[27]

Katz N., Nilpotent connections and the monodromy theor em: applications of a result of Turrittin, Publ. I. H. E. S. 39 (1970), 175-232

1970
[28]

Klingler B., Hodge loci and atypical intersections: co njectures, preprint arXiv:1711.09387 (2017), to appear in Motives and Complex Multiplication

2017 arXiv
[29]

Springer (2001), 771-808

Kontsevich M., Zagier D., Periods, in Mathematics unlimited - 2001 and Beyond . Springer (2001), 771-808

2001
[30]

Lauter K., Viray B., On singular moduli for arbitrary di scriminants, I. M. R. N. 19 (2015), 9206-9250

2015
[32]

Papas G., Some cases of the Zilber-Pink Conjecture for c urves in Ag (2023), I. M. R. N. 5 (2024), 4160-4206

2023
[33]

Papas G., Two Large Galois orbits conjectures in Y(1), p reprint arXiv:2310.04943 (2023)

2023
[34]

Papas G., Height bounds for certain exceptional points in some variations of Hodge structures, preprint arXiv:2201.11240v4 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[35]

Pink R., A combination of the conjectures of Mordell-La ng and Andr´ e-Oort, inGeo- metric Methods in Algebra and Number Theory , (Bogomolov, F., Tschinkel, Y ., Eds.), Progress in Mathematics 253, Birkh¨ auser (2005), 251-282

2005
[36]

Rivoal T., Les E-fonctions et G-fonctions de Siegel, in P´eriodes et transcendance , Ed. ´Ec. Polytech., Palaiseau (2024)

2024
[37]

Siegel C.-L., ¨Uber einige Anwendungen diophantischer Approximationen, Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (1929)

1929
[38]

Urbanik D., Geometric G-functions and atypicality, pr eprint arXiv:2301.01857 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[39]

W¨ ustholz G., Leibniz’ conjecture, periods and motive s, Colloquium De Giorgi 2009, Scuola Norm. Sup. (2012), 33-42. G-FUNCTIONS, MOTIVES, AND UNLIKELY INTERSECTIONS - OLD AND NEW. 11

2012
[40]

Studies 213, Princeton Univ

Zannier U., Some problems of unlikely intersections in Arithmetic and G eometry, Annals of Math. Studies 213, Princeton Univ. Press (2012). INSTITUT MATH ´EMATIQUE DE JUSSIEU , S ORBONNE UNIVERSIT ´E, PARIS 05, F RANCE . Email address: yves.andre@imj-prg.fr

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Aspects of Mathematics E13, Vieweg, Braun- schweig (1989)

Andr´ e Y .,G-functions and geometry . Aspects of Mathematics E13, Vieweg, Braun- schweig (1989)

work page 1989

[2] [1]

Ancona G., Fratila G., Algebraic classes in mixed charac teristic and Andr´ e’sp-adic periods, preprint arXiv:2207.09213 (2022)

arXiv 2022

[3] [3]

Trento conf

Andr´ e Y .,p-adic Betti lattices, in p-adic analysis, Proc. Trento conf. onp-adic analysis, Springer L. N. 1454 (1990), 23-63

work page 1990

[4] [4]

Andr´ e Y ., Th´ eorie des motifs et interpr´ etation g´ eom´ etrique des valeursp-adiques de G-functions (une introduction), in Number theory (Paris, 1992–1993) , London Math. Soc. L. N. 215, Cambridge Univ. Press (1995), 37-60

work page 1995

[5] [5]

Andr´ e Y ., G-functions and transcendence, J.Reine Angew. Math. 476 (1996), 95-125

work page 1996

[6] [6]

From C to Cp

Andr´ e Y .,Period mappings and differential equations. From C to Cp. MSJ Memoir 12 (2003)

work page 2003

[7] [7]

1104 in S´eminaire Bourbaki 2015/2016, Ast´ erisque 390 (2017)

Andr´ e Y ., Groupes de Galois motiviques et p´ eriodes, Exp. 1104 in S´eminaire Bourbaki 2015/2016, Ast´ erisque 390 (2017)

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Andr´ e Y ., Baldassarri F., Geometric theory of G-functi ons, in Arithmetic Geometry , Symp. Math. XXXVII, Cambridge Univ. Press, (1997)

work page 1997