Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On the local well-posedness of fractionally dissipated primitive equations with transport noise

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves local existence and pathwise uniqueness for the three-dimensional primitive equations with fractional dissipation and Stratonovich transport noise.

desk verdict Credible local well-posedness for a new stochastic 3D primitive-equation regime, resting on a single novel commutator estimate that deserves referee scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09956 v1 pith:VHHRVMDG submitted 2025-01-17 math.AP math.PR

Ruimeng Hu , Quyuan Lin , Rongchang Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.PR MSC 35Q8660H1576M3535Q3586A10
keywords stochasticprimitiveequationstransportnoisefractionaldissipationhydrostaticLerayprojectionpathwiseuniquenesslocalwell-posednesscriticalSobolevspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the three-dimensional primitive equations of large-scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics, damped by the fractional Laplacian $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ for $s\in(1,2)$, have unique local pathwise solutions in $H^\sigma$ ($\sigma>3$) for arbitrary initial data, when the equations are driven by Stratonovich transport noise. At the critical dissipation index $s=1$, the same conclusion holds provided the initial data are small and the vertical shear of the noise coefficients is small. The significance is that fractional dissipation interpolates between the fully viscous case, where global well-posedness is known, and the inviscid case, which is ill-posed and can blow up; the paper shows the subcritical and critical regimes remain well-posed despite the loss of horizontal derivatives and the singular nature of the hydrostatic Leray projection. The argument hinges on new commutator estimates that make the Itô–Stratonovich correction controllable by the fractional dissipation.

What carries the argument

The engine is the hydrostatic Leray projection $P\phi=\phi-\nabla_h\Delta_h^{-1}\nabla_h\cdot\phi$, which removes the barotropic component and eliminates pressure; unlike the usual Leray projection, its symbol is singular along the entire vertical-frequency axis, so standard commutator cancellations fail. To compensate, the paper proves commutator estimates in negative Sobolev norms (Lemma B.3) and, as the central new input, the two bounds of Lemma B.4 for $[P,b\cdot\nabla]\phi$ and for $\Lambda^{-1/2}[\Lambda^s,b\cdot\nabla][P,b\cdot\nabla]\phi$. These estimates decompose the Itô–Stratonovich corrector into terms whose regularity loss is at most half a derivative, which the fractional Laplacian can dominate; they are what makes the energy estimates of Proposition 3.1 close.

What would settle it

Do the explicit Fourier calculation that Lemma B.4 is designed to control: take $b=(0,0,\sin z)$ and $\phi=(e^{{\rm i}N x_1}\cos(2\pi z),0,0)$ on the three-torus, with the symmetries of Section 2, and compare both sides of the second bound in Lemma B.4 as $N\to\infty$; if the left side grows faster than $O(N^{s+1/2})$, the estimate and the main theorem collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.3: for $\sigma>3$, $s\in(1,2)$, and noise coefficients in $\ell^2(\mathbb{N},H^{\sigma+3})$, every $H^\sigma$ initial datum gives a maximal pathwise solution of the fractionally dissipated primitive equations; for $s=1$ the same holds under the smallness conditions (2.3) and $\|V_0\|_\sigma<1/C_0$. The mechanism is a cancellation between the Itô–Stratonovich corrector and the noise energy input: the paper proves that $\langle\Lambda^\sigma P(b_k\cdot\nabla P(b_k\cdot\nabla))V,\Lambda^\sigma V\rangle + \|\Lambda^\sigma P(b_k\cdot\nabla V)\|^2$ is bounded by order $\|b_k\|^2\|V\|_{\sigma+1/2}^2$ plus lower-order terms. Because this is exactly the order of the quadratic nonlinearity, subcritical dissipation $s>1$ absorbs it by interpolation, while critical dissipation $s=1$ absorbs it only when the coefficient in front of the $\sigma+1/2$ norm is small, which is what the noise and data smallness conditions enforce.

Load-bearing premise

The proof stands on the new commutator estimates in Lemmas B.3 and B.4; if the double commutator $\Lambda^{-1/2}[\Lambda^s,b\cdot\nabla][P,b\cdot\nabla]\phi$ actually loses half a derivative more than the paper claims, the fractional dissipation cannot absorb the noise, and the energy estimates fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any $\sigma>3$ and $s\in(1,2)$, local well-posedness holds for every initial datum of finite $H^\sigma$ norm, with a maximal existence time characterized by the norm exceeding any prescribed level.
  • For $s=1$, local well-posedness holds for small initial data, and the required noise smallness (2.3) is automatically satisfied when the horizontal noise components are independent of $z$.
  • Pathwise uniqueness holds, so the martingale solutions constructed by compactness are actually strong (pathwise) solutions on the original system up to the explosion time.
  • The double cutoff technique used for uniqueness improves the earlier analytic-class argument for stochastic inviscid primitive equations, replacing analytic regularity with Sobolev regularity in the subcritical regime.
  • For $s<1$ the argument cannot work: Sobolev well-posedness is impossible, and the cancellation behind the corrector bound fails in the analytic class unless the noise coefficient is spatially constant, leaving the supercritical case open.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Lemmas B.3–B.4 are correct, the same corrector-cancellation template should apply to other anisotropic fluid models whose projection symbol has a singular set of positive dimension, giving a general route for transport noise under weak dissipation.
  • The smallness condition singles out $\partial_z b^h$ as the quantity controlling the critical case; the paper does not explore it, but a natural conjecture is that large vertical shear of the noise causes finite-time loss of regularity at $s=1$ even from small data.
  • The analytic-class failure in the supercritical case suggests that any future well-posedness result for $s<1$ will need either noise independent of the vertical variable, or a weakening of the solution concept.
  • A sharpened version of (2.3) that tracks only the highest-order symbol of $\partial_z b^h$ might relax the critical smallness assumption; testing this would require only revisiting the estimates in Proposition 3.1.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves a local well-posedness theorem for the three-dimensional primitive equations with fractional dissipation ( -Δ)^{s/2}, s∈[1,2), driven by Stratonovich transport noise. The main result, Theorem 2.3, states that for σ>3 and noise coefficients in ℓ²(N,H^{σ+3}), every initial datum V0∈L²(Ω,H^σ) admits a maximal pathwise solution when s∈(1,2); in the critical case s=1 the same conclusion is claimed for small initial data and small vertical noise variation as quantified by (2.3). The proof is organized around a Galerkin approximation of a cut-off system, uniform energy estimates (Proposition 3.1), a compactness argument yielding martingale solutions (Proposition 3.2), and pathwise uniqueness via a double cut-off (Proposition 3.3). The central new ingredient is a collection of commutator estimates involving the hydrostatic Leray projection, especially Lemma B.4, whose proof depends on the negative-Sobolev commutator estimate Lemma B.3. The paper also contains a short discussion of the supercritical case s<1, explaining why the method would require analytic initial data and why the Stratonovich-corrector cancellation fails for spatially dependent noise in that setting.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, this is the first local well-posedness result for 3D fractionally dissipated primitive equations with transport noise, and it gives a natural interpolation between the fully viscous and inviscid stochastic theories. The paper is unusually concrete: the Galerkin estimates are written out in detail, the compactness passage is standard but complete, and the new commutator lemmas in Appendix B are proved in the paper rather than cited. The treatment of the critical case with an explicit smallness condition on ∂_z b^h is a genuine contribution, and the supercritical discussion is honest and includes a worked example showing why analytic weights break the key cancellation. The main weaknesses are localized to the final localization step and to the statement of the critical smallness threshold; these are repairable without changing the strategy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Proof of Theorem 2.3, after (3.19)] The stopping time τ = inf{t≥0: ||V||_σ > ρ} does not ensure that the cut-off function θρ(||V||_{W^{1,∞}}) is identically 1 on [0,τ). The cut-off is activated when ||V||_{W^{1,∞}} > ρ/2, while the Sobolev embedding only gives ||V||_{W^{1,∞}} ≤ C0||V||_σ; hence ||V||_σ can be strictly below ρ at the first time the cut-off drops below 1. Consequently the stopped cut-off solution is not in general a solution of the original equation (2.4) on the whole interval [0,τ). The argument should use τ = inf{t≥0: ||V||_{W^{1,∞}} > ρ/2}, or otherwise prove that the cut-off remains equal to 1 up to the stopping time under the stated choice of ρ.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 2.3, critical case s=1] The displayed condition 2C0M < ρ < 1/(2Cσ) with M := 1/(4C0Cσ) is inconsistent, because 2C0M = 1/(2Cσ). The intended smallness condition is 2C0||V0||_σ < ρ, which is satisfiable only if ||V0||_σ < 1/(4C0Cσ) up to the exact universal constants. The theorem statement's threshold ||V0||_σ < 1/C0 is therefore not justified by the proof as written. Please correct the constant in both the statement and the proof; the qualitative claim that sufficiently small initial data are allowed in the critical case remains plausible.
  3. [Proposition 3.3, final step] The stochastic integral appearing after the definition of Y_t is, under the stated L²-type hypotheses, only a continuous local martingale: the integrand has a.s. finite ∫|·|²dt, but the expectation of the square root need not be finite. Before concluding E[Y_t||V(t)||²_{σ−1/2}] ≤ 0, one should apply a localization argument, for instance stopping at τ_N = inf{t : ∫_0^t (sum_k |⟨Λ^{σ−1/2}PB_kV, Λ^{σ−1/2}V⟩|²) dr ≥ N}, and then pass N→∞. This is a standard but necessary step.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Lemma B.3, estimate of I21] In the displayed chain for I21, the first line drops the factor |j| and the second line introduces |k−j|^s|j|^{s−α}; as written this is not a valid algebraic inequality. The desired bound still follows by using |j| ≤ |k−j| on the region |j| ≤ 1/2|k−j|, but the display should be rewritten for clarity.
  2. [Proposition 3.2, linear term convergence] In the bound for the Itô-Stratonovich corrector, the norms of ~V_{n_j}−~V and ~V appear to be L² norms. Since (PB_k)^2 is a second-order operator, the estimate needs H^σ norms of the difference (or a test function with two derivatives) to be valid as written.
  3. [Definition 2.2] The Wiener process components are denoted (~W^k)_{k≥0}, while all sums in the paper start at k=1; the indexing should be made consistent.
  4. [Section 2.2] The linear operator P defined by P e_k = ~p_k and the hydrostatic Leray projection P defined in (2.1) share the same symbol; this can be confusing and the notation should be changed.
  5. [Proof of Theorem 2.3] In the line "V ∈ L²(Ω; C([0,T;H^σ]) ∩ L²(0,T;H^{σ+s/2}))", the bracket in C([0,T;H^σ]) should read C([0,T];H^σ).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem is derived from explicit assumptions via estimates proved in the paper, with self-citations used only for context or open problems.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 2.3, is established by proving uniform energy estimates for Galerkin approximations (Proposition 3.1), compactness to obtain martingale solutions (Proposition 3.2), and pathwise uniqueness via a double cutoff (Proposition 3.3). The load-bearing commutator estimates, especially the negative-Sobolev estimate in Lemma B.3 and the hydrostatic projection commutator estimate in Lemma B.4, are proved in the appendix rather than imported from prior work. Lemma B.3 explicitly notes that no corresponding result was found in the literature and supplies a full proof. Lemma B.4 builds on Lemma B.3 and standard fractional Leibniz/commutator tools cited from external literature (e.g., [16], [19]), not from the authors' own prior results. Self-citations such as [2], [35], and [37] appear in the introduction and in remarks on the supercritical case, but they are used for context (e.g., ill-posedness of supercritical PE, analytic-class results) and do not supply any assumption or estimate needed for Theorem 2.3. The smallness condition (2.3) in the critical case is an explicit hypothesis on the noise, not a fitted parameter, and the proof derives the energy bound from it. No equation is fitted to data, no prediction is equivalent to an input by construction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work is invoked to force the choice of solution. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

There are no fitted parameters. All assumptions are explicit regularity or smallness conditions in Theorem 2.3, and the proof is self-contained modulo standard analytic, Sobolev, and stochastic tools. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Sobolev and Fourier calculus on T^3, fractional Laplacian properties
    Used throughout the paper; standard background.
  • standard math Kato-Ponce and fractional Leibniz estimates, Lemma A.1 and estimate (B.1) from Chae et al. 2012
    Imported as Lemma A.1 and (B.1); required for all commutator bounds.
  • domain assumption Phase-space symmetry: V periodic and even in z, w odd, zero mean, integral of horizontal divergence over z equals zero
    Section 2.1 defines the phase space H^sigma; the hydrostatic Leray projection P is only valid on this space.
  • domain assumption Noise coefficients are divergence-free, zero mean, with even/odd symmetry, and satisfy (b_k) in l^2(N,H^{sigma+3}); smallness condition (2.3) when s=1
    Section 2.2; the critical-case smallness is an explicit hypothesis, not fitted to data.
  • standard math Stratonovich-to-Ito conversion formula used to pass from (2.4) to (2.5)
    Section 2.3; standard stochastic calculus for finite-dimensional noise.
  • standard math Standard probabilistic compactness and uniqueness tools: Prokhorov, Skorokhod, Burkholder-Davis-Gundy, Aubin-Lions-Simon, Yamada-Watanabe
    Used in Sections 3.2 and 3.3; standard background.
  • standard math The hydrostatic Leray projection P is self-adjoint on H and commutes with Lambda^s in the periodic setting
    Used in (3.4) and in Proposition 3.2; follows from the Fourier symbol of (2.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the local well-posedness of fractionally dissipated primitive equations with transport noise." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VHHRVMDG

@misc{pith2026250109956,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the local well-posedness of fractionally dissipated primitive equations with transport noise},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VHHRVMDG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09956}
}
abstract

We investigate the three-dimensional fractionally dissipated primitive equations with transport noise, focusing on subcritical and critical dissipation regimes characterized by $ (-\Delta)^{s/2} $ with $ s \in (1,2)$ and $s = 1$, respectively. For $\sigma>3$, we establish the local existence of unique pathwise solutions in Sobolev space $H^\sigma$. This result applies to arbitrary initial data in the subcritical case ($s \in(1,2)$), and to small initial data in the critical case ($s=1$). The analysis is particularly challenging due to the loss of horizontal derivatives in the nonlinear terms and the lack of full dissipation. To address these challenges, we develop novel commutator estimates involving the hydrostatic Leray projection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Closed Estimates of Leray Projected Transport Noise and Strong Solutions of the Stochastic Euler Equations

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Closed Sobolev estimates for Leray-projected transport noise yield unique local strong solutions of the 3D stochastic Euler equations, with blow-up characterized by L1([0,T]; W^{1,∞}).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    On the Dirichlet Fractional Laplacian and Applications to the SQG Equation on Bounded Domains

    Elie Abdo and Quyuan Lin. On the Dirichlet fractional Lap lacian and applications to the SQG equation on bounded domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05209 , 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    W ell-posedness and ill-posedness of the primitive equations with fraction al horizontal dissipation

    Elie Abdo, Quyuan Lin, and Changhui Tan. W ell-posedness and ill-posedness of the primitive equations with fraction al horizontal dissipation. preprint, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Sobolev spaces

    Robert A Adams and John JF Fournier. Sobolev spaces. Elsevier, 2003

    2003

  4. [4]

    The primitive equations with rough tra nsport noise: Global well-posedness and regularity

    Antonio Agresti. The primitive equations with rough tra nsport noise: Global well-posedness and regularity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01193, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Global smooth solutions by transport n oise of 3D Navier-Stokes equations with small hyperviscosi ty

    Antonio Agresti. Global smooth solutions by transport n oise of 3D Navier-Stokes equations with small hyperviscosi ty. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09267 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    The stochastic primitive equations with non-isothermal turbulent pressure

    Antonio Agresti, Matthias Hieber, Amru Hussein, and Mar tin Saal. The stochastic primitive equations with non- isothermal turbulent pressure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05973 , 2022

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    The stochastic primitive equations with transpor t noise and turbulent pressure

    Antonio Agresti, Matthias Hieber, Amru Hussein, and Mar tin Saal. The stochastic primitive equations with transpor t noise and turbulent pressure. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis a nd Computations , 12(1):53–133, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    On the well-posedness of stochastic Boussinesq equations wit h transport noise

    Diego Alonso-Or´ an and Aythami Bethencourt de Le´ on. On the well-posedness of stochastic Boussinesq equations wit h transport noise. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 30(1):175–224, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Mathematical ju stification of the hydrostatic approximation in the primiti ve equations of geophysical fluid dynamics

    Pascal Az´ erad and Francisco Guill´ en. Mathematical ju stification of the hydrostatic approximation in the primiti ve equations of geophysical fluid dynamics. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis , 33(4):847–859, 2001

    2001

  2. [10]

    W ell-posedness of the 3D stochastic primitive equations with multiplicat ive and transport noise

    Zdzislaw Brze´ zniak and Jakub Slav ´ ık. W ell-posedness of the 3D stochastic primitive equations with multiplicat ive and transport noise. Journal of Differential Equations , 296:617–676, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Some nonlinear problems involving no n-local diffusions

    Luis A Caffarelli. Some nonlinear problems involving no n-local diffusions. In ICIAM 07-6th International Congress on Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Eur. Math. Soc., Z¨ uri ch, pages 43–56, 2009

    2009

  4. [12]

    Drift diffusion equ ations with fractional diffusion and the quasi-geostrophic equation

    Luis A Caffarelli and Alexis Vasseur. Drift diffusion equ ations with fractional diffusion and the quasi-geostrophic equation. Annals of Mathematics , pages 1903–1930, 2010

    1903

  5. [13]

    Finite-time blowup for the inviscid primitive eq ua- tions of oceanic and atmospheric dynamics

    Chongsheng Cao, Slim Ibrahim, Kenji Nakanishi, and Edr iss S Titi. Finite-time blowup for the inviscid primitive eq ua- tions of oceanic and atmospheric dynamics. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 337(2):473–482, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Global well-posednes s of the three-dimensional viscous primitive equations of l arge scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics

    Chongsheng Cao and Edriss S Titi. Global well-posednes s of the three-dimensional viscous primitive equations of l arge scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics. Annals of Mathematics , pages 245–267, 2007. 26 R. HU, Q. LIN, AND R. LIU

    2007

  7. [15]

    The mathematical theories of diffusion: nonlinear and fract ional diffusion

    Jos´ e Antonio Carrillo, Manuel del Pino, Alessio Figal li, Giuseppe Mingione, Juan Luis V´ azquez, and Juan Luis V´ azquez. The mathematical theories of diffusion: nonlinear and fract ional diffusion. Nonlocal and Nonlinear Diffusions and Interactions: New Methods and Directions...

    2017

  8. [16]

    Generalized surface quasi- geostrophic equations with singular velocities

    Dongho Chae, Peter Constantin, Diego C´ ordoba, Franci sco Gancedo, and Jiahong W u. Generalized surface quasi- geostrophic equations with singular velocities. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 65(8):1037–1066, 2012

    2012

  9. [17]

    Stable si ngularity formation for the inviscid primitive equations

    Charles Collot, Slim Ibrahim, and Quyuan Lin. Stable si ngularity formation for the inviscid primitive equations. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, 41(2):317–356, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Unique ergodicity for fractionally dissipated, stochasti cally forced 2D Euler equations

    Peter Constantin, Nathan Glatt-Holtz, and Vlad Vicol. Unique ergodicity for fractionally dissipated, stochasti cally forced 2D Euler equations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 330:819–857, 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    Lon g time dynamics of forced critical SQG

    Peter Constantin, Andrei Tarfulea, and Vlad Vicol. Lon g time dynamics of forced critical SQG. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 335:93–141, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Nonlinear maximum pri nciples for dissipative linear nonlocal operators and appl ica- tions

    Peter Constantin and Vlad Vicol. Nonlinear maximum pri nciples for dissipative linear nonlocal operators and appl ica- tions. Geometric And Functional Analysis , 22:1289–1321, 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Solutio n properties of a 3D stochastic Euler fluid equation

    Dan Crisan, Franco Flandoli, and Darryl D Holm. Solutio n properties of a 3D stochastic Euler fluid equation. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 29(3):813–870, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    A class of global l arge solutions to the magnetohydrodynamic equations with fractional dissipation

    Yichen Dai, Zhong Tan, and Jiahong W u. A class of global l arge solutions to the magnetohydrodynamic equations with fractional dissipation. Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik , 70:1–13, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Local martingale and pathwise solutions for an abstract fluids model

    Arnaud Debussche, Nathan Glatt-Holtz, and Roger Temam . Local martingale and pathwise solutions for an abstract fluids model. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 240(14-15):1123–1144, 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Global existence and regularity for the 3D stochastic primitive equations of the ocean and atmosphe re with multiplicative white noise

    Arnaud Debussche, Nathan Glatt-Holtz, Roger Temam, an d Mohammed Ziane. Global existence and regularity for the 3D stochastic primitive equations of the ocean and atmosphe re with multiplicative white noise. Nonlinearity, 25(7):2093, 2012

    2012

  17. [25]

    Second ord er perturbation theory of two-scale systems in fluid dynamic s

    Arnaud Debussche and Umberto Pappalettera. Second ord er perturbation theory of two-scale systems in fluid dynamic s. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Measure theory, volume 143

    Joseph L Doob. Measure theory, volume 143. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  19. [27]

    Random perturbation of PDEs and fluid dynamic models: ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XL–2010, volume 2015

    Franco Flandoli. Random perturbation of PDEs and fluid dynamic models: ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XL–2010, volume 2015. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

    2010

  20. [28]

    Delayed blow-up by transport noise

    Franco Flandoli, Lucio Galeati, and Dejun Luo. Delayed blow-up by transport noise. Communications in Partial Dif- ferential Equations , 46(9):1757–1788, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Martingale and st ationary solutions for stochastic Navier-Stokes equation s

    Franco Flandoli and Dariusz Gatarek. Martingale and st ationary solutions for stochastic Navier-Stokes equation s. Prob- ability Theory and Related Fields , 102(3):367–391, 1995

    1995

  22. [30]

    High mode transport nois e improves vorticity blow-up control in 3D Navier–Stokes equations

    Franco Flandoli and Dejun Luo. High mode transport nois e improves vorticity blow-up control in 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 180:309–363, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    From additi ve to transport noise in 2d fluid dynamics

    Franco Flandoli and Umberto Pappalettera. From additi ve to transport noise in 2d fluid dynamics. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations , 10(3):964–1004, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    On the effect of rotation on the life-span of analytic solutions to the 3D inviscid primitive equations

    Tej Eddine Ghoul, Slim Ibrahim, Quyuan Lin, and Edriss S Titi. On the effect of rotation on the life-span of analytic solutions to the 3D inviscid primitive equations. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis , 243(2):747–806, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and singular Vlasov equations

    Daniel Han-Kwan and Toan T Nguyen. Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and singular Vlasov equations. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 221(3):1317–1344, 2016

    2016

  26. [34]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    Lars H¨ ormander.The analysis of linear partial differential operators III: P seudo-differential operators . Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  27. [35]

    Local martingale solutions a nd pathwise uniqueness for the three-dimensional stochast ic inviscid primitive equations

    Ruimeng Hu and Quyuan Lin. Local martingale solutions a nd pathwise uniqueness for the three-dimensional stochast ic inviscid primitive equations. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis a nd Computations , 11(4):1470– 1518, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Pathwise solutions for stoch astic hydrostatic Euler equations and hydrostatic Navier- Stokes equations under the local Rayleigh condition

    Ruimeng Hu and Quyuan Lin. Pathwise solutions for stoch astic hydrostatic Euler equations and hydrostatic Navier- Stokes equations under the local Rayleigh condition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07810 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Regularizat ion by noise for the inviscid primitive equations

    Ruimeng Hu, Quyuan Lin, and Rongchang Liu. Regularizat ion by noise for the inviscid primitive equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21336, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Finite-tim e blowup and ill-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the inviscid primitive equations with rotation

    Slim Ibrahim, Quyuan Lin, and Edriss S Titi. Finite-tim e blowup and ill-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the inviscid primitive equations with rotation. Journal of Differential Equations , 286:557–577, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Existence of a local smooth solution in pro bability to the stochastic Euler equations in R3

    Jong Uhn Kim. Existence of a local smooth solution in pro bability to the stochastic Euler equations in R3. Journal of Functional Analysis, 256(11):3660–3687, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative q uasi- geostrophic equation

    Alexander Kiselev, Fedor Nazarov, and Alexander Volbe rg. Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative q uasi- geostrophic equation. Inventiones Mathematicae , 167(3):445–453, 2007

    2007

  33. [41]

    Existence of a solution ‘in the larg e’ for the 3D large-scale ocean dynamics equations

    Georgij M Kobelkov. Existence of a solution ‘in the larg e’ for the 3D large-scale ocean dynamics equations. Comptes Rendus Mathematique , 343(4):283–286, 2006. STOCHASTIC PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS 27

    2006

  34. [42]

    Small-scale structure of a scalar fi eld convected by turbulence

    Robert H Kraichnan. Small-scale structure of a scalar fi eld convected by turbulence. The Physics of Fluids , 11(5):945–953, 1968

    1968

  35. [43]

    Anomalous scaling of a randomly adv ected passive scalar

    Robert H Kraichnan. Anomalous scaling of a randomly adv ected passive scalar. Physical review letters , 72(7):1016, 1994

    1994

  36. [44]

    Local existence and uniqueness for the hydrostatic Euler equations on a bounded domain

    Igor Kukavica, Roger Temam, Vlad C Vicol, and Mohammed Z iane. Local existence and uniqueness for the hydrostatic Euler equations on a bounded domain. Journal of Differential Equations , 250(3):1719–1746, 2011

    2011

  37. [45]

    W eak convergence of st ochastic integrals and differential equations II: Infinite d imen- sional case

    Thomas Kurtz and Philip Protter. W eak convergence of st ochastic integrals and differential equations II: Infinite d imen- sional case. Probabilistic Models for Nonlinear Partial Differential Eq uations, pages 197–285, 1996

    1996

  38. [46]

    The Yamada-W atanabe-Engelbert theore m for general stochastic equations and inequalities

    Thomas G Kurtz. The Yamada-W atanabe-Engelbert theore m for general stochastic equations and inequalities. Electronic Journal of Probability [electronic only] , 12:951–965, 2007

    2007

  39. [47]

    W ell-posedness for a stochast ic 2D Euler equation with transport noise

    Oana Lang and Dan Crisan. W ell-posedness for a stochast ic 2D Euler equation with transport noise. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations , 11(2):433–480, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    On Kato–Ponce and fractional Leibniz

    Dong Li. On Kato–Ponce and fractional Leibniz. Revista matem´ atica iberoamericana, 35(1):23–100, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    The primitive equations as t he small aspect ratio limit of the Navier–Stokes equations: Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic approximation

    Jinkai Li and Edriss S Titi. The primitive equations as t he small aspect ratio limit of the Navier–Stokes equations: Rigorous justification of the hydrostatic approximation. Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees , 124:30–58, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Enhanced dissipation for stochastic Navier –Stokes equations with transport noise

    Dejun Luo. Enhanced dissipation for stochastic Navier –Stokes equations with transport noise. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations , pages 1–36, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    On equations o f stochastic fluid mechanics

    Remigijus Mikulevicius and B Rozovskii. On equations o f stochastic fluid mechanics. In Stochastics in Finite and Infinite Dimensions: In Honor of Gopinath Kallianpur , pages 285–302. Springer, 2001

    2001

  44. [52]

    Stochas tic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent flows

    Remigijus Mikulevicius and Boris L Rozovskii. Stochas tic Navier–Stokes equations for turbulent flows. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 35(5):1250–1310, 2004

    2004

  45. [53]

    Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Eul er and Navier–Stokes equations

    Michael Renardy. Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Eul er and Navier–Stokes equations. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis , 194(3):877–886, 2009

    2009

  46. [54]

    Compact sets in the space Lp(0, T ; B)

    Jacques Simon. Compact sets in the space Lp(0, T ; B). Annali di Matematica pura ed applicata , 146(1):65–96, 1986

    1986

  47. [55]

    Sobolev, Besov and Nikolskii fractiona l spaces: imbeddings and comparisons for vector valued spac es on an interval

    Jacques Simon. Sobolev, Besov and Nikolskii fractiona l spaces: imbeddings and comparisons for vector valued spac es on an interval. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata , 157(1):117–148, 1990

    1990

  48. [56]

    A general framework for solvi ng singular SPDEs with applications to fluid models driven by pseudo-differential noise

    Hao Tang and Feng-Yu W ang. A general framework for solvi ng singular SPDEs with applications to fluid models driven by pseudo-differential noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08312 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Pseudodifferential operators ( PMS-34)

    Michael Eugene Taylor. Pseudodifferential operators ( PMS-34). In Pseudodifferential Operators (PMS-34) . Princeton University Press, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Blowup of solutions of the hydrostatic E uler equations

    Tak Kwong W ong. Blowup of solutions of the hydrostatic E uler equations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 143(3):1119–1125, 2015

    2015

  51. [59]

    The 2D magnetohydrodynamic equations with partial or fractional dissipation

    Jiahong W u. The 2D magnetohydrodynamic equations with partial or fractional dissipation. Lectures on the analysis of nonlinear partial differential equations, Morningside Lec tures on Mathematics, Part , 5:283–332, 2018

    2018

  52. [60]

    W ell-posedness and invisci d limits of the Boussinesq equations with fractional Laplac ian dissipation

    Jiahong W u and Xiaojing Xu. W ell-posedness and invisci d limits of the Boussinesq equations with fractional Laplac ian dissipation. Nonlinearity, 27(9):2215, 2014

    2014

  53. [61]

    Global well- posedness for a class of 2D Boussinesq systems with fraction al dissipation

    W anrong Yang, Quansen Jiu, and Jiahong W u. Global well- posedness for a class of 2D Boussinesq systems with fraction al dissipation. Journal of Differential Equations , 257(11):4188–4213, 2014. (R. Hu) Department of Mathematics, Department of Statistics and App lied Probabili...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.