Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.09967 v1 pith:MWTHXHNH submitted 2025-01-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords modelsexplainablemethodsbehaviorexplainabilityinterpretabilitylearningmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has continued to achieve tremendous success in recent times. However, the decision logic of these frameworks is often not transparent, making it difficult for stakeholders to understand, interpret or explain their behavior. This limitation hinders trust in machine learning systems and causes a general reluctance towards their adoption in practical applications, particularly in mission-critical domains like healthcare and autonomous driving. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques facilitate the explainability or interpretability of machine learning models, enabling users to discern the basis of the decision and possibly avert undesirable behavior. This comprehensive survey details the advancements of explainable AI methods, from inherently interpretable models to modern approaches for achieving interpretability of various black box models, including large language models (LLMs). Additionally, we review explainable AI techniques that leverage LLM and vision-language model (VLM) frameworks to automate or improve the explainability of other machine learning models. The use of LLM and VLM as interpretability methods particularly enables high-level, semantically meaningful explanations of model decisions and behavior. Throughout the paper, we highlight the scientific principles, strengths and weaknesses of state-of-the-art methods and outline different areas of improvement. Where appropriate, we also present qualitative and quantitative comparison results of various methods to show how they compare. Finally, we discuss the key challenges of XAI and directions for future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Triadic Fusion of Cognitive, Functional, and Causal Dimensions for Explainable LLMs: The TAXAL Framework

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    TAXAL proposes a triadic cognitive-functional-causal framework for role-sensitive explainability in agentic LLMs, demonstrated through cross-domain case studies.

  2. Unveiling Instruction-Specific Neurons & Experts: An Analytical Framework for LLM's Instruction-Following Capabilities

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Activation-frequency analysis identifies sparse units in LLMs that respond to instructions; same-category instructions share more of these units than different-category ones, and fine-tuning measurably changes the sets.

Pith tools