pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.10280 · v2 · submitted 2025-01-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Evidence for the gravity-driven and magnetically-regularized gas flows feeding the massive protostellar cluster in Cepheus A

Panigrahy Sandhyarani (1) , Chakali Eswaraiah (1 , 2) , Di Li (3) Enrique V\'azquez-Semadeni (4) , Gilberto C. G\'omez (4) , Travis J. Thieme (5) , Manash R. Samal (6) , Jia-Wei Wang (7)
show 44 more authors
Shih-Ping Lai (8) Wen-Ping Chen (9) D. K. Ojha (10) ((1) Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science Education Research Tirupati Yerpedu Tirupati Andhra Pradesh India (2) Department of Physical Sciences Research (IISER) Mohali Knowledge City SAS Nagar Punjab India (3) New Cornerstone Science Laboratory Department of Astronomy Tsinghua University Beijing China (4) Instituto de Radioastronom\'ia y Astrof\'isica Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de M\'exico Morelia Michoac\'an Mexico (5) Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy \& Astrophysics AS/NTU Taipei Taiwan (6) Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) Navrangpura Ahmedabad Gujarat India (7) East Asian Observatory University Park Hilo HI USA (8) Institute of Astronomy Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University Hsinchu Taiwan (9) Institute of Astronomy National Central University Taoyuan Taiwan (10) Department of Astronomy Astrophysics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai India)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Cepheus Aprotostellar clustermagnetic fieldsgravitygas accretiondust polarizationstar formationturbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravity drives gas flows that drag magnetic field lines in Cepheus A, with magnetic tension regulating turbulence to enable ordered accretion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents high-resolution dust polarization and C18O line observations of Cepheus A to examine the interplay among gravity, magnetic fields, and turbulence during massive protostellar cluster formation. It reports aligned gravitational, magnetic, and velocity fields with an energy hierarchy where gravitational energy exceeds magnetic and kinetic energies. Gravity acts as the main driver that pulls gas inward and drags along the magnetic field lines, while magnetic tension serves as a secondary force that damps turbulence and permits ordered flows. This produces a measured accretion rate of approximately 2.1 plus or minus 0.4 times 10 to the minus 4 solar masses per year. The magnetic field directions stay coherent from 5-parsec cloud scales down to 2000-AU disk scales, indicating that magnetic fields cooperate with gravity rather than resist collapse at clump scales.

Core claim

The central claim is that gravity induces gas flows and drags B-field lines as the primary force while magnetic tension regulates turbulence as a secondary force, enabling ordered accretion at ∼2.1±0.4×10−4 M⊙ yr−1; this is shown by the alignment of gravitational (G), magnetic (B), and velocity (K) fields together with the energy hierarchy EG > EB > EK, which demonstrates cooperation between gravity and magnetic fields at the clump/hub scale rather than opposition.

What carries the argument

The aligned G, B, and K fields with energy hierarchy EG > EB > EK, through which gravity drags B-lines and magnetic tension regulates turbulence to produce ordered flows.

If this is right

  • Magnetic fields cooperate with gravity at clump/hub scales instead of resisting collapse.
  • Magnetic field alignment remains coherent from 5 pc cloud scales to 2000 AU disk scales.
  • Magnetic tension damps turbulence enough to produce ordered flows at an accretion rate of ∼2.1±0.4×10−4 M⊙ yr−1.
  • The conventional view of B-fields opposing gravitational collapse is replaced by a cooperative mechanism at these scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar gravity-magnetic cooperation may operate in other massive star-forming regions if the alignment pattern repeats.
  • Cluster formation models may need to treat magnetic tension as a turbulence regulator that assists rather than opposes gravity.
  • Multi-scale polarization observations of additional hubs could test whether the reported energy hierarchy and field coherence are common.

Load-bearing premise

The observed alignments of gravitational, magnetic, and velocity fields plus the energy hierarchy directly show that gravity drags B-field lines and magnetic tension actively regulates turbulence, rather than the alignments arising from projection effects or passive advection.

What would settle it

An observation demonstrating that the alignments result from projection effects or that the energy hierarchy is reversed (with magnetic or kinetic energy dominating) would falsify the interpretation that gravity drives and magnetic tension regulates the flows.

read the original abstract

The hierarchical interplay among gravity, magnetic fields, and turbulence in forming massive protostellar clusters remains elusive. We present high-resolution ($\sim$14 arcsec $\simeq$ 0.05 pc) 850 $\mu$m dust polarization and C$^{18}$O line observations of Cepheus A using JCMT SCUBA-2/POL-2 and HARP. Our analysis reveals aligned gravitational (G), magnetic (B), and velocity fields (K), with an energy hierarchy of $E_{\mathrm{G}}$ > $E_{\mathrm{B}}$ > $E_{\mathrm{K}}$. Gravity, as the primary driver, induces gas flows and drags in B-field lines. Magnetic tension, as a secondary force, regulates turbulence, enabling ordered flows with an accretion rate of $\sim$ 2.1 $\pm$ 0.4 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. This challenges the conventional view of B-fields resisting collapse in the clump/hub scale, instead showing cooperation with gravity. The $\sim$0.6 pc clump-scale B-field (with mean PA $\sim$ 45{\deg}) aligns coherently with fields at cloud ($\sim$5 pc), core ($\sim$0.05 pc), and disk ($\sim$2000 AU) scales, offering new insights into the role of magnetic fields in multiscale star formation dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents JCMT SCUBA-2/POL-2 850 μm dust polarization and HARP C¹⁸O observations of Cepheus A at ~14″ (~0.05 pc) resolution. It reports coherent alignments among gravitational (G), magnetic (B), and kinematic (K) fields across ~0.6 pc clump to ~2000 AU disk scales (mean PA ~45°), an energy ordering E_G > E_B > E_K, and derives an accretion rate of ~2.1 ± 0.4 × 10^{-4} M_⊙ yr^{-1}. The central claim is that gravity drives gas flows that drag B-field lines while magnetic tension secondarily regulates turbulence to permit ordered accretion, implying cooperation rather than resistance between gravity and B-fields at clump/hub scales.

Significance. If the energy hierarchy and causal interpretation are robustly demonstrated, the result would supply direct observational evidence that magnetic fields can cooperate with gravity to organize accretion flows in massive protoclusters, with implications for multiscale star-formation models and the role of B-fields from cloud to disk scales.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that observed G-B-K alignments plus E_G > E_B > E_K demonstrate active gravitational dragging of B-lines and tension-mediated regulation of turbulence (rather than projection or passive advection) is not supported by any forward-modeling, statistical test, or exclusion of line-of-sight effects; this interpretation is load-bearing for the central challenge to the conventional resisting-B-field picture.
  2. [Methods] Methods (energy derivation): the procedures used to compute E_G, E_B, and E_K from column-density, velocity, and polarization maps are unspecified in the provided text, yet the hierarchy is presented as direct evidence for the primary/secondary force ordering; without these steps the energy comparison cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that observed G-B-K alignments plus E_G > E_B > E_K demonstrate active gravitational dragging of B-lines and tension-mediated regulation of turbulence (rather than projection or passive advection) is not supported by any forward-modeling, statistical test, or exclusion of line-of-sight effects; this interpretation is load-bearing for the central challenge to the conventional resisting-B-field picture.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not include forward modeling, statistical tests for projection effects, or explicit exclusion of passive advection. The interpretation is presented as a plausible scenario consistent with the observed alignments and energy ordering. We will revise the abstract to qualify the language regarding causality and add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section addressing potential line-of-sight effects and the limitations of the current evidence. This constitutes a partial revision to strengthen the presentation without altering the core observational results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (energy derivation): the procedures used to compute E_G, E_B, and E_K from column-density, velocity, and polarization maps are unspecified in the provided text, yet the hierarchy is presented as direct evidence for the primary/secondary force ordering; without these steps the energy comparison cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the specific computational procedures for the energies were not described in the text. We will add a new subsection to the Methods section that details the calculations: E_G derived from the gravitational potential using the column-density map, E_B estimated from the polarization angle dispersion and assumed field strength, and E_K from the C^{18}O velocity dispersion, including the relevant equations, assumptions, and any averaging over the mapped region. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims follow from observational measurements

full rationale

The paper reports direct observational results from JCMT SCUBA-2/POL-2 dust polarization and HARP C18O line data at ~0.05 pc resolution. The central claims rest on measured position-angle alignments among G, B, and K fields plus the derived energy ordering EG > EB > EK, from which the authors infer gravity-driven flows and magnetic regulation. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented that reduce any prediction or uniqueness claim to the inputs by construction. The interpretation of active dragging versus passive advection is an inference step, not a definitional or statistical closure within the paper's own formalism. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and externally falsifiable via the raw polarization and velocity maps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard astrophysical assumptions about interpreting polarization and line data; no new free parameters or entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dust polarization at 850 μm traces the plane-of-sky magnetic field direction
    Standard assumption in submillimeter polarimetry used to infer B-field orientation from SCUBA-2/POL-2 data.
  • domain assumption Energy densities EG, EB, EK can be estimated from observed column densities, velocity dispersions, and polarization angles
    Invoked to establish the hierarchy EG > EB > EK and the regulatory role of magnetic tension.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6102 in / 1518 out tokens · 28590 ms · 2026-05-23T05:50:23.040345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The role of massive stars in astrophysics

    Kennicutt, Robert C. The role of massive stars in astrophysics. Proceedings of the Inter- national Astronomical Union 1(S227), 3–11 (2005). Cambridge University Press

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Urquhart, J. S. et al. ATLASGAL–properties of compact H ii regions and their natal clumps. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435, 400–428 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    The spine of the swan: a Herschel study of the DR21 ridge and filaments in Cygnus X

    Hennemann, M, Motte, F, Schneider, N, Didelon, P, Hill, T, Arzoumanian, D, Bontemps, Sylvain, Csengeri, T, André, Ph, Konyves, V , others. The spine of the swan: a Herschel study of the DR21 ridge and filaments in Cygnus X. Astronomy & Astrophysics 543, L3 (2012). EDP Sciences

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    The origin of OB clusters: from 10 pc to 0.1 pc

    Liu, Hauyu Baobab, Quintana-Lacaci, Guillermo, Wang, Ke, Ho, Paul TP, Li, Zhi-Yun, Zhang, Qizhou, Zhang, Zhi-Yu. The origin of OB clusters: from 10 pc to 0.1 pc. The Astrophysical Journal 745, 1, 61 (2011). IOP Publishing

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Discovery of an extremely wide-angle bipolar outflow in afgl 5142

    Liu, Tie, Zhang, Qizhou, Kim, Kee-Tae, Wu, Yuefang, Lee, Chang-Won, Goldsmith, Paul F, Li, Di, Liu, Sheng-Yuan, Chen, Huei-Ru, Tatematsu, Ken’ichi, others. Discovery of an extremely wide-angle bipolar outflow in afgl 5142. The Astrophysical Journal 824, 1, 31 (2016). IOP Publishing

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Global collapse of molec- ular clouds as a formation mechanism for the most massive stars

    Peretto, Nicolas, Fuller, GA, Duarte-Cabral, Ana, Avison, A, Hennebelle, P, Pineda, JE, André, Ph, Bontemps, Sylvain, Motte, F, Schneider, N, others. Global collapse of molec- ular clouds as a formation mechanism for the most massive stars. Astronomy & Astro- physics 555, A112 (2013). EDP Sciences

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    SDC13 infrared dark clouds: Longitudinally collapsing filaments?

    Peretto, Nicolas, Fuller, GA, André, Ph, Arzoumanian, D, Rivilla, VM, Bardeau, S, Puer- tas, S Duarte, Fernandez, JP Guzman, Lenfestey, C, Li, G-X, others. SDC13 infrared dark clouds: Longitudinally collapsing filaments?. Astronomy & Astrophysics 561, A83 (2014). EDP Sciences

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    High-mass star for- mation through filamentary collapse and clump-fed accretion in G22

    Yuan, Jinghua, Li, Jin-Zeng, Wu, Yuefang, Ellingsen, Simon P, Henkel, Christian, Wang, Ke, Liu, Tie, Liu, Hong-Li, Zavagno, Annie, Ren, Zhiyuan, others. High-mass star for- mation through filamentary collapse and clump-fed accretion in G22. The Astrophysical Journal 852, 1, 12 (2017). IOP Publishing

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    ATOMS: ALMA Three-millimeter Observations of Massive Star-forming regions– XI

    Zhou, Jian-Wen, Liu, Tie, Evans, Neal J, Garay, Guido, Goldsmith, Paul F, Gómez, Gilberto C, Vázquez-Semadeni, Enrique, Liu, Hong-Li, Stutz, Amelia M, Wang, Ke, oth- ers. ATOMS: ALMA Three-millimeter Observations of Massive Star-forming regions– XI. From inflow to infall in hub-filament systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 514, 4, ...

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Global hierarchical collapse in molecular clouds

    Vázquez-Semadeni, Enrique, Palau, Aina, Ballesteros-Paredes, Javier, Gómez, Gilberto C., Zamora-Avilés, Manuel (2019). Global hierarchical collapse in molecular clouds. To- wards a comprehensive scenario. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490(3), 3061–3097. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/mnras/stz2736. arXiv, 1903.11247, astro-ph.GA. ht...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2736 2019

  11. [11]

    C., González-Samaniego, A

    Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Gómez, G. C., González-Samaniego, A. (2024). Multiscale ac- cretion in dense cloud cores and the delayed formation of massive stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 530(3), 3445–3457. Oxford University Press

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Zhang, Q., Wang, Y ., Pillai, T., Rathborne, J. (2009). Fragmentation at the earliest phase of massive star formation. The Astrophysical Journal, 696(1), 268. IOP Publishing

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Gravitational collapse in turbulent molecular clouds

    Klessen, Ralf S, Heitsch, Fabian, Mac Low, Mordecai-Mark. Gravitational collapse in turbulent molecular clouds. I. Gasdynamical turbulence. The Astrophysical Journal 535, 2, 887 (2000). IOP Publishing

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    Inefficient star formation through turbulence, magnetic fields and feedback

    Federrath, Christoph. Inefficient star formation through turbulence, magnetic fields and feedback. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450, 4, 4035–4042 (2015). Oxford University Press

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Gravity, magnetic field, and turbulence: relative importance and impact on fragmentation in the infrared dark cloud G34.43+00.24

    Tang, Ya-Wen, Koch, Patrick M, Peretto, Nicolas, Novak, Giles, Duarte-Cabral, Ana, Chapman, Nicholas L, Hsieh, Pei-Ying, Yen, Hsi-Wei. Gravity, magnetic field, and turbulence: relative importance and impact on fragmentation in the infrared dark cloud G34.43+00.24. The Astrophysical Journal 878, 1, 10 (2019). IOP Publishing

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Magnetic fields in star formation: from clouds to cores

    Pattle, Kate, Fissel, Laura, Tahani, Mehrnoosh, Liu, Tie, Ntormousi, Evangelia. Magnetic fields in star formation: from clouds to cores. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11179 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Dynamics of cluster-forming hub-filament systems-The case of the high-mass star-forming complex Monoceros R2

    Treviño-Morales, SP, Fuente, A, Sánchez-Monge, Á, Kainulainen, J, Didelon, P, Suri, S, Schneider, N, Ballesteros-Paredes, J, Lee, Y-N, Hennebelle, P, others. Dynamics of cluster-forming hub-filament systems-The case of the high-mass star-forming complex Monoceros R2. Astronomy & Astrophysics 629, A81 (2019). EDP Sciences

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Filament coalescence and hub structure in Mon R2-Implications for massive star and cluster formation

    Kumar, MSN, Arzoumanian, D, Men’Shchikov, A, Palmeirim, P, Matsumura, M, Inut- suka, Si. Filament coalescence and hub structure in Mon R2-Implications for massive star and cluster formation. Astronomy & Astrophysics 658, A114 (2022). EDP Sciences

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    M., Liu, T., Tamura, M., Furuya, R

    Wang, J.-W., Lai, S.-P., Eswaraiah, C., Pattle, K., Di Francesco, J., Johnstone, D., Koch, P. M., Liu, T., Tamura, M., Furuya, R. S., others (2019). JCMT BISTRO Survey: Magnetic Fields within the Hub-filament Structure in IC 5146. The Astrophysical Journal, 876(1),

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    M., Galván-Madrid, R., Lai, S.-P., Liu, H

    Wang, J.-W., Koch, P. M., Galván-Madrid, R., Lai, S.-P., Liu, H. B., Lin, S.-J., Pattle, K. (2020). Formation of the Hub–Filament System G33.92+0.11: Local Interplay between Gravity, Velocity, and Magnetic Field. The Astrophysical Journal,905(2), 158. IOP Pub- lishing

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    D., Linz, H., Henning, T., Gieser, C., Kuiper, R., Vlemmings, W., Hennebelle, P., Feng, S., Smith, R., et al

    Beuther, H., Soler, J. D., Linz, H., Henning, T., Gieser, C., Kuiper, R., Vlemmings, W., Hennebelle, P., Feng, S., Smith, R., et al. (2020). Gravity and rotation drag the magnetic field in high-mass star formation. The Astrophysical Journal,904(2), 168. IOP Publishing

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    M., Clarke, S

    Wang, J.-W., Koch, P. M., Clarke, S. D., Fuller, G., Peretto, N., Tang, Y .-W., Yen, H.-W., Lai, S.-P., Ohashi, N., Arzoumanian, D., et al. (2024). Filamentary network and magnetic field structures revealed with BISTRO in the high-mass star-forming region NGC 2264: Global properties and local magnetogravitational configurations. The Astrophysical Jour- na...

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Planck 2018 results

    Collaboration, Planck, Aghanim, N, Akrami, Y , Alves, MIR, Ashdown, M, Aumont, J, Baccigalupi, C, Ballardini, M, Banday, AJ, Barreiro, RB, others. Planck 2018 results. A&a 641, A12 (2020)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    The relation between the column density structures and the magnetic field orientation in the Vela C molecular complex.Astronomy & Astrophysics 603, A64 (2017)

    Soler, JD, Ade, PAR, Angilè, FE, Ashton, P, Benton, SJ, Devlin, MJ, Dober, B, Fissel, LM, Fukui, Y , Galitzki, N, others. The relation between the column density structures and the magnetic field orientation in the Vela C molecular complex.Astronomy & Astrophysics 603, A64 (2017). EDP Sciences

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Using Herschel and Planck observations to delineate the role of magnetic fields in molecular cloud structure

    Soler, Juan D. Using Herschel and Planck observations to delineate the role of magnetic fields in molecular cloud structure. Astronomy & Astrophysics 629, A96 (2019). EDP Sciences

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    What are we learning from the relative orientation between density structures and the magnetic field in molecular clouds?

    Soler, Juan D, Hennebelle, Patrick. What are we learning from the relative orientation between density structures and the magnetic field in molecular clouds?. Astronomy & Astrophysics 607, A2 (2017). EDP Sciences

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    The magnetic field structure in molecular cloud filaments

    Gómez, Gilberto C, Vázquez-Semadeni, Enrique, Zamora-Avilés, Manuel (2018). The magnetic field structure in molecular cloud filaments. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 480, 3, 2939–2944. Oxford University Press

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Magnetized filamentary gas flows feeding the young embedded cluster in Serpens South

    Pillai, Thushara GS, Clemens, Dan P, Reissl, Stefan, Myers, Philip C, Kauffmann, Jens, Lopez-Rodriguez, Enrique, Alves, Felipe O, Franco, GAP, Henshaw, Jonathan, Menten, Karl M, others. Magnetized filamentary gas flows feeding the young embedded cluster in Serpens South. Nature Astronomy 4, 12, 1195–1201 (2020). Nature Publishing Group UK London

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Arzoumanian, Doris, Furuya, Ray S, Hasegawa, Tetsuo, Tahani, M, Sadavoy, S, Hull, Charles LH, Johnstone, D, Koch, Patrick M, Inutsuka, S-i, Doi, Yasuo, others. Dust polarized emission observations of NGC 6334-BISTRO reveals the details of the com- plex but organized magnetic field structure of the high-mass star-forming hub-filament network. Astronomy & A...

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    B-fields in Star-forming Region Observations (BISTRO): Magnetic fields in the filamentary structures of Serpens Main

    Kwon, Woojin, Pattle, Kate, Sadavoy, Sarah, Hull, Charles LH, Johnstone, Doug, Ward- Thompson, Derek, Di Francesco, James, Koch, Patrick M, Furuya, Ray, Doi, Yasuo, others. B-fields in Star-forming Region Observations (BISTRO): Magnetic fields in the filamentary structures of Serpens Main. The Astrophysical Journal 926, 2, 163 (2022). IOP Publishing

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    ATOMS: ALMA Three-millimeter Observations of Massive Star-forming Regions - IX

    Liu, Hong-Li, Tej, Anandmayee, Liu, Tie, Goldsmith, Paul F., Stutz, Amelia, Ju- vela, Mika, Qin, Sheng-Li, Xu, Feng-Wei, Bronfman, Leonardo, Evans, Neal J., Saha, Anindya, Issac, Namitha, Tatematsu, Ken’ichi, Wang, Ke, Li, Shanghuo, Zhang, Siju, Baug, Tapas, Dewangan, Lokesh, Wu, Yue-Fang, Zhang, Yong, Lee, Chang Won, Liu, Xun-Chuan, Zhou, Jianwen, Soam, ...

    work page doi:10.1093/mn- 2022

  32. [32]

    M., Padovani, M., Galli, D., Hull, C

    Sanhueza, P., Girart, J. M., Padovani, M., Galli, D., Hull, C. L. H., Zhang, Q., Cortes, P., Stephens, I. W., Fernández-López, M., Jackson, J. M., et al. (2021). Gravity-driven 26 magnetic field at 1000 au scales in high-mass star formation. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 915(1), L10. IOP Publishing

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    C., Girart, J

    Cortes, P. C., Girart, J. M., Sanhueza, P., Liu, J., Martin, S., Stephens, I. W., Beuther, H., Koch, P. M., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Sanchez-Monge, A., et al. (2024). MagMar III–Resisting the Pressure: Is the Magnetic Field Overwhelmed in NGC 6334I?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14663

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    eprint: https://academic.oup.com/ mnras/article-pdf/350/2/506/3888238/350-2-506.pdf

    Curran, R. L., Chrysostomou, A. (2007). Magnetic fields in mas- sive star-forming regions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society, 382(2), 699–716. Oxford University Press. 10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2007.12399.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12399.x. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/382/2/699/3426399/mnras0382-0699.pdf

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2007

  35. [35]

    Interferometric mapping of magnetic fields in star-forming regions

    Lai, Shih-Ping (2001). Interferometric mapping of magnetic fields in star-forming regions. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. October. Physics: Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001PhDT.........1L. Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    Beuther, H., Gieser, C., Soler, J. D., Zhang, Q., Rao, R., Semenov, D., Henning, Th., Pudritz, R., Peters, T., Klaassen, P., others Density distributions, magnetic field structures and fragmentation in high-mass star formation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11874 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Vlemmings, W. H. T., Diamond, P. J., van Langevelde, H. J., Torrelles, J. M. (2006). The magnetic field in the star-forming region Cepheus A from H2O maser polarization observations. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 448(2), 597–

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    The Magnetic Field in the Star-forming Region Cepheus A from Water Maser Polarization Observations

    EDP Sciences. 10.1051/0004-6361:20054275. arXiv, astro-ph/0510452, astro-ph. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...448..597V , Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054275

  39. [39]

    The Tai Chi in Star Formation

    Li, Hua-bai (2017). The Tai Chi in Star Formation. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. 2053-

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    10.1088/978-1-6817-4293-9

    978-1-6817-4293-9. 10.1088/978-1-6817-4293-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/978- 1-6817-4293-9

    work page doi:10.1088/978-1-6817-4293-9

  41. [41]

    VLBA Determination of the distance to nearby star-forming regions

    Dzib, Sergio, Loinard, Laurent, Rodríguez, Luis F, Mioduszewski, Amy J, and Torres, Rosa M. VLBA Determination of the distance to nearby star-forming regions. VI. The distance to the young stellar object HW 9 in Cepheus A. The Astrophysical Journal 733, 1, 71 (2011). IOP Publishing

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Yu, Zhi-Yao, Nagahama, Tomoo, & Fukui, Yasuo. (1996). The New Observation of C18O (J= 1–0) Molecular Emission in the Cepheus OB3 Molecular Cloud. The Astrophysical Journal, 471(2), 867. IOP Publishing

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    Observa- tions of new far infrared sources in the Cepheus OB 3 molecular cloud

    Koppenaal, K., Sargent, A.I., Nordh, L., Van Duinen, R.J., Aalders, J.W.G. Observa- tions of new far infrared sources in the Cepheus OB 3 molecular cloud. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 75(1-2), L1–L3 (1979)

    work page 1979

  44. [44]

    J., Moeckel, N., Bally, J

    Cunningham, N. J., Moeckel, N., Bally, J. (2009). A Pulsed, Precessing Jet in Cepheus A. The Astrophysical Journal, 692(2), 943. IOP Publishing

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    J., Torstensson, K

    Sanna, A., Moscadelli, L., Surcis, G., Van Langevelde, H. J., Torstensson, K. J. E., & Sobolev, A. M. (2017). Planar infall of CH3OH gas around Cepheus A HW2. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 603, A94. EDP Sciences. 27

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Pattle, Kate, Ward-Thompson, Derek, Berry, David, Hatchell, Jennifer, Chen, Huei-Ru, Pon, Andy, Koch, Patrick M., Kwon, Woojin, Kim, Jongsoo, Bastien, Pierre, et al. (2017). The JCMT BISTRO survey: the magnetic field strength in the Orion A filament. The Astrophysical Journal, 846(2), 122. IOP Publishing

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Greaves, J. S. & Holland, W. S. & Jenness, T. & Chrysostomou, A. & Berry, D. S. & Mur- ray, A. G. & Tamura, M. & Robson, E. I. & Ade, P. A. R. & Nartallo, R. & others (2003). A submillimetre imaging polarimeter at the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 340(2), 353–361. The Royal Astronomical Society

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    C., McPhee, C

    Matthews, B. C., McPhee, C. A., Fissel, L. M., & Curran, R. L. (2009). The Legacy of SCUPOL: 850 µm Imaging Polarimetry from 1997 to 2005. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 182(1), 143. IOP Publishing

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Curran, R. L. & Chrysostomou, A. (2007). Magnetic fields in massive star-forming re- gions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382(2), 699–716. Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford, UK

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    E., Ray, T

    Pudritz, R. E., Ray, T. P. (2019). The role of magnetic fields in protostellar outflows and star formation. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 54. Frontiers Media SA

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Mignon-Risse, R., González, M., Commerçon, B. (2023). The role of magnetic fields in the formation of multiple massive stars. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 673, A134. EDP Sciences

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Oliva, A., Kuiper, R. (2023). Modeling disks and magnetic outflows around a forming massive star—I. Investigating the two-layer structure of the accretion disk. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 669, A80. EDP Sciences

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Polarization properties and magnetic field structures in the high-mass star- forming region W51 observed with ALMA

    Koch, Patrick M, Tang, Ya-Wen, Ho, Paul TP, Yen, Hsi-Wei, Su, Yu-Nung, Takakuwa, Shigehisa. Polarization properties and magnetic field structures in the high-mass star- forming region W51 observed with ALMA. The Astrophysical Journal 855, 39 (2018), IOP Publishing

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Koch, Patrick M., Tang, Ya-Wen, Ho, Paul T. P. Magnetic field strength maps for molec- ular clouds: a new method based on a polarization–intensity gradient relation. The Astro- physical Journal 747(1), 79 (2012). IOP Publishing

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    M., Terzieva, R., & Herbst, E

    Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., Terzieva, R., & Herbst, E. (1998). The ionization fraction in dense cloud cores. The Astrophysical Journal, 499(1), 234. IOP Publishing

    work page 1998

  56. [56]

    Blackman, E. G. (2013). On deriving flux freezing in magnetohydrodynamics by direct differentiation. European Journal of Physics, 34(2), 489. IOP Publishing

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Das, H. K. & Gronke, M. (2024). Magnetic fields in multiphase turbulence: impact on dy- namics and structure. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 527(1), 991–

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Oxford University Press

    work page

  59. [59]

    Davis Jr, L. (1951). The strength of interstellar magnetic fields. Physical Review, 81(5),

    work page 1951

  60. [60]

    Chandrasekhar, S., Fermi, E. (1953). Problems of gravitational stability in the presence of a magnetic field. Astrophysical Journal, 116–141. American Astronomical Society

    work page 1953

  61. [61]

    Skalidis, R., Tassis, K. (2021). High-accuracy estimation of magnetic field strength in the interstellar medium from dust polarization. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 647, A186. EDP Sciences

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Camacho, V ., Vázquez-Semadeni, E., Palau, A., Zamora-Avilés, M. (2023). The kinetic and magnetic energy budget of hub-filament systems during the gravitational fragmen- tation of molecular clouds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523(3), 3376–3392. Oxford University Press

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Fragmentation of shocked flows: gravity, turbulence, and cooling

    Heitsch, Fabian, Hartmann, Lee W., Burkert, Andreas. Fragmentation of shocked flows: gravity, turbulence, and cooling. The Astrophysical Journal 683, 2, 786 (2008). IOP Publishing

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    Effects of magnetic field strength and orientation on molecular cloud formation

    Heitsch, Fabian, Stone, James M., Hartmann, Lee W.. Effects of magnetic field strength and orientation on molecular cloud formation. The Astrophysical Journal 695, 1, 248 (2009). IOP Publishing

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    Two-fluid magnetohydrodynamic simulations of converging HI flows in the interstellar medium

    Inoue, Tsuyoshi, Inutsuka, Shu-ichiro. Two-fluid magnetohydrodynamic simulations of converging HI flows in the interstellar medium. I. Methodology and basic results. The Astrophysical Journal 687, 1, 303 (2008). IOP Publishing

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    Two-fluid magnetohydrodynamics simulations of converging H i flows in the interstellar medium

    Inoue, Tsuyoshi, Inutsuka, Shu-ichiro. Two-fluid magnetohydrodynamics simulations of converging H i flows in the interstellar medium. II. Are molecular clouds generated directly from a warm neutral medium?. The Astrophysical Journal 704, 1, 161 (2009). IOP Publishing

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    Formation of turbulent and magnetized molecular clouds via accretion flows of H i clouds

    Inoue, Tsuyoshi, Inutsuka, Shu-ichiro. Formation of turbulent and magnetized molecular clouds via accretion flows of H i clouds. The Astrophysical Journal 759, 1, 35 (2012). IOP Publishing

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    Molecular cloud evolution–IV

    Vázquez-Semadeni, Enrique, Banerjee, Robi, Gómez, Gilberto C., Hennebelle, Patrick, Duffin, Dennis, Klessen, Ralf S.. Molecular cloud evolution–IV . Magnetic fields, ambipo- lar diffusion and the star formation efficiency.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 414, 3, 2511–2527 (2011). Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford, UK

    work page 2011

  69. [69]

    Accretion and diffusion time-scales in sheets and fil- aments

    Heitsch, Fabian, Hartmann, Lee. Accretion and diffusion time-scales in sheets and fil- aments. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443, 1, 230–240 (2014). Oxford University Press

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    Reconnection diffusion in turbulent fluids and its implications for star for- mation

    Lazarian, A. Reconnection diffusion in turbulent fluids and its implications for star for- mation. Space Science Reviews 181, 1–59 (2014). Springer

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Impact of magnetic fields on molecular cloud formation and evolution

    Körtgen, Bastian, Banerjee, Robi. Impact of magnetic fields on molecular cloud formation and evolution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451, 3, 3340–3353 (2015). Oxford University Press

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Magnetic suppression of turbulence and the star formation activity of molecular clouds

    Zamora-Avilés, Manuel, Vázquez-Semadeni, Enrique, Körtgen, Bastian, Banerjee, Robi, Hartmann, Lee (2018). Magnetic suppression of turbulence and the star formation activity of molecular clouds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474(4), 4824–

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Oxford University Press. 29

    work page

  74. [74]

    Magnetic field regulated infall on the disc around the massive protostar Cepheus A HW2

    Vlemmings, WHT, Surcis, G, Torstensson, KJE, van Langevelde, HJ (2010). Magnetic field regulated infall on the disc around the massive protostar Cepheus A HW2. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 404(1), 134–143. Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford, UK

    work page 2010

  75. [75]

    Ulrich, R. K. (1976). An infall model for the T Tauri phenomenon. Astrophysical Journal, 210, 377–391

    work page 1976

  76. [76]

    Cassen, P., Moosman, A. (1981). On the formation of protostellar disks. Icarus, 48(3), 353–376. Elsevier

    work page 1981

  77. [77]

    Chevalier, R. A. (1983). The environments of T Tauri stars. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), 268, 753–765. Research supported by the University of Virginia

    work page 1983

  78. [78]

    K., Menten, K

    Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T. K., Menten, K. M., Walmsley, C. M., Wyrowski, F. Massive molecular outflows. Astronomy & Astrophysics 383, 892–904 (2002). EDP Sciences

    work page 2002

  79. [79]

    R., Brand, J., Sridharan, T

    Zhang, Q., Hunter, T. R., Brand, J., Sridharan, T. K., Cesaroni, R., Molinari, S., Wang, J., Kramer, M. (2005). Search for CO Outflows toward a Sample of 69 High-Mass Protostellar Candidates. II. Outflow Properties. The Astrophysical Journal, 625(2), 864. 10.1086/429660, https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/429660

    work page doi:10.1086/429660 2005

  80. [80]

    Spitzer-IRAC GLIMPSE of high mass protostellar objects- II

    Grave, JMC & Kumar, MSN. Spitzer-IRAC GLIMPSE of high mass protostellar objects- II. SED modelling of a bona fide sample. Astronomy & Astrophysics 498, 1, 147–159 (2009), EDP Sciences

    work page 2009

Showing first 80 references.