Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

GOTO065054+593624: a 8.5 mag amplitude dwarf nova identified in real time via Kilonova Seekers

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read GOTO0650 is a WZ Sge-type dwarf nova with an 8.5-mag outburst, ten echo outbursts, and a likely 90-minute orbit, making it a candidate period bouncer.

desk verdict A well-observed new WZ Sge dwarf nova with a secure classification, but the 73-year recurrence rests on a single plate whose astrometric association is not rigorously established. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11524 v2 pith:CECD7QUZ submitted 2025-01-20 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

T. L. Killestein , G. Ramsay , M. Kennedy , L. Kelsey , D. Steeghs , S. Littlefair , B. Godson , J. Lyman
show 57 more authors
M. Pursiainen B. Warwick C. Krawczyk L. K. Nuttall E. Wickens S. D. Alexandrov C. M. da Silva R. Leadbeater K. Ackley M. J. Dyer F. Jiménez-Ibarra K. Ulaczyk D. K. Galloway V. S. Dhillon P. O'Brien K. Noysena R. Kotak R. P. Breton E. Pallé D. Pollacco A. Kumar D. O'Neill T. Butterley R. Wilson S. Mattila A. Sahu R. Starling C. Y. Wang Q. Liu A. Li Z. Dai H. Feng W. Yuan R. Billington A. G. Bull S. Gaudenzi V. Gonano H. Krawczyk M. T. Mazzucato A. Pasqua J. A. da Silva Campos M. Torres-Guerrero N. N. Antonov S. J. Bean E.T. Boeneker S. M. Brincat G. S. Darlington F. Dubois F.-J. Hambsch D. Messier A. Oksanen G. Poyner F. D. Romanov I. D. Sharp T. Tordai T. Vanmunster K. Wenzel
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords dwarfnovaecataclysmicvariablesWZSgestarsperiodbouncersaccretiondiskssuperhumpsechooutburstscitizenscience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that GOTO0650, a transient discovered in October 2024, is a WZ Sge-type dwarf nova—a rare accreting binary whose outbursts are so large and infrequent that they are hard to catch. The evidence is an outburst amplitude of about 8.5 magnitudes, a superhump period that implies an orbital period near 90 minutes, ten echo outbursts after the main eruption, and a candidate historical superoutburst in 1951 that points to a roughly 73-year recurrence. The authors argue the quiescent white dwarf is about 11,000 K, close to known period-bouncer candidates, which makes GOTO0650 a candidate period bouncer: a system that has passed the orbital-period minimum and whose donor has become a brown dwarf. If the classification holds, the object helps bridge the gap between the predicted and observed numbers of such evolved binaries.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism that carries the classification is the accretion-disk thermal-viscous instability as it plays out in an extremely low mass-transfer binary: the main superoutburst, the superhump signal from the 3:1 tidal resonance, and the train of echo outbursts are all read as repeated disk instability events. The paper uses the 3:1 resonance superhump relation to convert the ~91-minute superhump period to an orbital period of about 90 minutes, and white-dwarf model grids to convert the quiescent colours to an effective temperature of $11100^{+2200}_{-1500}$ K. The echo outburst train is the identifying mechanism: short-duration rebrightenings after a WZ Sge superoutburst are seen in only a small set of systems, and their shortening recurrence intervals here are compared with the behaviour of the best-known echo-outburst system.

What would settle it

Measure the orbital period directly from a quiescent radial-velocity curve: if it is not near the 88.5-90.4 minutes inferred from superhumps, or if the implied mass ratio is not as low as a post-minimum donor requires, the period-bouncer classification fails. Alternatively, deep UV photometry that resolves the Balmer jump would reveal whether the quiescent spectral energy distribution is really a single ~11,000 K white dwarf.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that GOTO0650 is a WZ Sge-type dwarf nova, a low-mass-transfer cataclysmic variable whose outbursts exceed about 6 magnitudes and recur on timescales of years to decades. Its 2024 superoutburst rose to V = 13.04, an amplitude of roughly 8.5 magnitudes over the quiescent g = 21.84 level, and was followed by a steady plateau decline, a short achromatic dip at day +14, and the appearance of ordinary superhumps at day +13.8 with a period near 91 minutes; converting that superhump period to an orbital period gives about 90 minutes. The post-outburst phase produced ten echo outbursts with recurrence times shortening from 13.5 to 6.5 days, and an archival photographic plate from 1951 appears to record a previous superoutburst, implying a recurrence time of roughly 73 years. In quiescence the spectrum shows narrow Balmer emission with weak He II, and the quiescent colours fit a white-dwarf-atmosphere model with effective temperature about 11,000 K, a value the authors compare with known period-bouncer candidates. The paper therefore identifies GOTO0650 as a candidate period bouncer—a system that has evolved past the orbital-period minimum—pending radial-velocity confirmation.

Load-bearing premise

The period-bouncer interpretation assumes the quiescent light is overwhelmingly the white dwarf; if the accretion disk or accretion column contributes much of the quiescent flux, the 11,000 K white-dwarf temperature and the analogy to other period bouncers break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If confirmed as a period bouncer, GOTO0650 joins the small set of post-period-minimum binaries, providing a direct test of the prediction that 40-70% of cataclysmic variables should be bouncers.
  • The ten echo outbursts with decreasing recurrence intervals give a rare empirical sequence against which accretion-disk instability and mass-retention models can be compared.
  • A 73-year recurrence from the 1951 archival detection implies that many high-amplitude WZ Sge systems may be missed by surveys that do not cover decades; future outbursts of GOTO0650 can be predicted from this cadence.
  • The high-state spectrum (pure Balmer absorption, no emission) and quiescent spectrum (narrow Balmer emission, weak He II) provide a template for classifying similar high-amplitude transients found by ongoing surveys.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension the paper leaves open is to model the echo sequence as a relaxation oscillator: the observed shrinkage from 13.5 to 6.5 days between outbursts, followed by a longer 16.0-day gap before the tenth echo, could be tested against a simple critical-surface-density threshold in the outer disk, using the published burst times as a time series.
  • If the 11,000 K white-dwarf temperature is confirmed, GOTO0650 lies near the cool edge of the white-dwarf instability strip; high-speed photometry in deep quiescence could search for non-radial pulsations that would make it a laboratory for white-dwarf cooling in cataclysmic variables.
  • The 1951 plate detection is a single point; searching other archival plate collections for independent detections would confirm the 73-year recurrence and could reveal whether the system's outbursts are strictly periodic or clustered.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the real-time discovery and multi-wavelength follow-up of GOTO065054+593624 (GOTO0650), a dwarf nova with a measured outburst amplitude of about 8.5 mag. Using GOTO, LCO, TTT, pt5m, Swift/UVOT, Einstein Probe/FXT, AAVSO, and archival photometry, the authors characterize the 2024 superoutburst: a bright plateau, a shallow dip, ten echo outbursts, superhumps first detected about 13.8 d after discovery, and a clear spectral transition from high-state Balmer absorption to quiescent Balmer emission with very weak He II. The quiescent SED is modelled as a ~11,000 K white dwarf, and the authors use the superhump period and evolutionary models to infer a ~90 min orbital period. They identify GOTO0650 as a WZ Sge type dwarf nova and a candidate period bouncer, and they interpret a candidate 1951 DASCH plate detection as a historical superoutburst, implying a recurrence time of 73 years.

Significance. If the central claims hold, GOTO0650 is a valuable addition to the small sample of well-observed WZ Sge systems, and it is among the few candidate period bouncers with comprehensive outburst coverage. The dataset is genuinely rich: dense multi-facility photometry, contemporaneous spectroscopy, UV and X-ray monitoring, and a machine-readable photometry table are all provided. The paper also makes a clear and credible case that citizen-scientist involvement (Kilonova Seekers) enabled the rapid follow-up. However, two load-bearing assumptions need attention: the identification of the 1951 DASCH source as GOTO0650, which underpins the 73-year recurrence-time claim, and the assumption that the quiescent Pan-STARRS SED is dominated by the white dwarf, which underpins the period-bouncer candidacy via the 11,000 K temperature and the comparison to QZ Lib and EZ Lyn.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1 and §5] The identification of the 1951 DASCH detection as a superoutburst of GOTO0650 is not established with sufficient rigor. The initial positional offset is 13 arcsec on a plate with 4 arcsec/pix scale; the re-fit with a smaller cutout yields 'better concordance (≈2 pixels)' but no quoted uncertainty, no astrometric solution RMS, and no distortion model. This association is then used in §5 to state that there was an outburst 73 years ago and to infer a recurrence time of 'many years or decades.' I request a quantitative astrometric analysis—including the uncertainties in the plate solution and source centroid—or, failing that, a clear downgrading of the claim to a tentative candidate with the recurrence-time statement revised accordingly.
  2. [§4.5] The white-dwarf temperature derived from the quiescent SED (Teff = 11,100 K) and the resulting comparison to the period-bouncer candidates QZ Lib and EZ Lyn rest on the assumption that the Pan-STARRS fluxes are dominated by the white dwarf. The paper itself states 'We here assume that we are indeed seeing the WD, when components from the disk and accretion column may be present,' but it does not test the sensitivity of the inference to a possible disk or accretion contribution. Since the period-bouncer candidacy leans on this temperature, the authors should either estimate the maximum plausible non-WD contribution from the existing photometry and spectral limits, or explicitly reframe the temperature and the period-bouncer comparison as a hypothesis requiring NUV or higher-resolution spectroscopic confirmation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §5] The phrasing 'a 8.5 mag' (abstract) and 'an WZ Sge type' (§5) should be corrected to 'an 8.5 mag' and 'a WZ Sge type'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption reads 'MJD 33,3703.06' with an extra comma; it should be 'MJD 33703.06'.
  3. [§4.2] The sentence 'Between E2 and E9 the recurrence time decreases from 13.5 d to 6.5, with an increase between E10 and E9 of 16.0 d' is confusingly worded; I suggest 'The interval between E9 and E10 increased to 16.0 d' for clarity.
  4. [§4.5] The text 'the Bergeron 10 model grids' should be expanded to identify the grid as the Montreal white-dwarf model atmospheres (Holberg & Bergeron 2006; Tremblay et al. 2011) to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [§3.1] The abbreviation for the American Association of Variable Star Observers appears with variable spacing ('AA VSO' and 'AAVSO'); please standardize throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WZ Sge classification and period-bouncer candidacy rest on external calibrations and independently obtained data, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

This is an observational characterization paper rather than a derivation. The central classification of GOTO0650 as a WZ Sge-type dwarf nova is based on measured outburst amplitude (~8.5 mag), a superhump period of ~91 min converted to an orbital period via the external Kato & Osaki (2013) relation, and the observed train of ten echo outbursts compared with independent WZ Sge literature (Patterson et al. 1998; Kato 2015). These are external calibrations applied to new data, not inputs defined by the paper. The distance is obtained from the Patterson (2011) peak-MV relation for WZ Sge systems and is then used to derive X-ray luminosity and quiescent absolute magnitude; this is a standard external calibration and, while uncertain, is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The SED modelling uses PanSTARRS colors against Bergeron/Bedard model grids to infer an 11,000 K white dwarf temperature, with the authors explicitly flagging the assumption that the flux is WD-dominated: 'We here assume that we are indeed seeing the WD, when components from the disk and accretion column may be present.' This weakens the period-bouncer interpretation but is not circular. The 1951 DASCH detection is a fragile astrometric association (13 arcsec initial offset, reduced to about 2 pixels by a qualitative re-fit with no quoted uncertainty), but the inference of a 73-year recurrence time is an empirical claim about an external plate archive, not a result forced by the paper's own construction. Self-citations to the Kilonova Seekers project and GOTO instrument papers document data provenance and discovery methodology; they do not supply the physical classification criteria. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, and no fitted-input-as-prediction step is present. The score of 1 reflects minor self-citations and acknowledged fragility in the historical-outburst association and SED assumptions, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All physical interpretations rely on literature calibrations (Patterson 2011, Kato & Osaki 2013, Knigge et al. 2011) and one explicit assumption about the SED composition. No new particles, forces, or physical mechanisms are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • White dwarf effective temperature (Teff) = 11100 +2200 -1500 K
    Fitted to PanSTARRS quiescent colors using Bergeron model grids and emcee sampling; log g is unconstrained and reddening is prior-dominated.
  • White dwarf surface gravity (log g) = unconstrained
    Free parameter in the SED fit; the posterior is effectively flat over the model grid.
  • Distance to GOTO0650 = 510 +80 -60 pc
    Adopted from the Patterson (2011) empirical peak-MV relation for WZ Sge systems rather than a geometric parallax; propagates into X-ray luminosity and SED scaling.
  • Foreground reddening E(B-V) = 0.056
    Fixed from Lallement/Vergely 3D reddening maps at the adopted distance; the posterior shown in Figure 14 is prior-dominated.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Peak absolute magnitude MV = 4.5 +/- 0.3 for WZ Sge systems (Patterson 2011)
    Used to derive distance and hence physical luminosities; Section 4.
  • domain assumption The quiescent SED is dominated by the white dwarf
    Section 4.5: 'we assume that we are indeed seeing the WD, when components from the disk and accretion column may be present'.
  • domain assumption Superhump period excess follows the 3:1 resonance relation of Kato & Osaki (2013)
    Used to translate superhump period to orbital period and mass ratio; Section 4.3.
  • domain assumption Knigge et al. (2011) evolutionary tracks correctly map mass ratio to pre/post-period-minimum status
    Basis for the q=0.05 vs q=0.12 interpretation and period bouncer candidacy; Section 4.3.
  • domain assumption The 1951 DASCH detection is the same object as GOTO0650
    Section 3.1: source offset by 13 arcsec, astrometrically re-solved to ~2 pixels after accounting for plate distortion.
  • domain assumption Foreground reddening E(B-V)=0.056 from Lallement/Vergely 3D maps
    Applied to all photometry and spectra; Section 3.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of GOTO065054+593624: a 8.5 mag amplitude dwarf nova identified in real time via Kilonova Seekers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CECD7QUZ

@misc{pith2026250111524,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: GOTO065054+593624: a 8.5 mag amplitude dwarf nova identified in real time via Kilonova Seekers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CECD7QUZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11524}
}
read the original abstract

Dwarf novae are astrophysical laboratories for probing the nature of accretion, binary mass transfer, and binary evolution -- yet their diverse observational characteristics continue to challenge our theoretical understanding. We here present the discovery of, and subsequent observing campaign on GOTO065054+593624 (hereafter GOTO0650), a dwarf nova of the WZ Sge type, discovered in real-time by citizen scientists via the Kilonova Seekers citizen science project, which has an outburst amplitude of 8.5 mag. An extensive dataset charts the photometric and spectroscopic evolution of this object, covering the 2024 superoutburst. GOTO0650 shows an absence of visible emission lines during the high state, strong H and barely-detected HeII emission, and high-amplitude echo outbursts with a rapidly decreasing timescale. The comprehensive dataset presented here marks GOTO0650 as a candidate period bouncer, and highlights the important contribution that citizen scientists can make to the study of Galactic transients.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11524 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. GOTO discovery triplet of GOTO0650 as seen by citizen sci￾entists on the Kilonova Seekers project, with science frame, historical reference image, and difference image. The inner box corresponds to a scale of ≈ 80 arcsec across. The labelling indicates the time of ob￾servation of this source, and the GOTO site and survey mode that the observation was taken from. Below the science image are a series of subframes show… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Harvard photographic plates retrieved via DASCH depicting a historical GOTO0650 superoutburst on MJD 33,3703.06 (1951.15), af￾ter correcting the alignment for additional distortion. We also show an image taken on MJD 33683.11 (1951.037). 3.2. Spectroscopy We obtained a number of spectra with the Alhambra Faint Ob￾ject Spectrograph (ALFOSC) mounted on the NOT at Roque de los Muchachos Observatory, La Palma. Specifica… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Collated photometry of GOTO0650 (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The g − r colour of GOTO0650, as a function of apparent mag￾nitude. The colour scale shows the phase relative to discovery. A clear change in source colour with magnitude is visible showing a strong red￾dening on the way down to the low state. Article number, page 6 of…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The high-cadence V-band photometry around the dip observed in GOTO0650 from AAVSO, LCO, pt5m, and TTT. The blue curve is a spline interpolation of the data. The vertical dashed line shows the initial onset of superhumps as the dip began. The g − r and r − i colour indi…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The inter-burst timescale for the echo outbursts observed in GOTO0650, with error bars corresponding to the half-width of a typical outburst. GOTO0650 shows a marked evolution towards more frequent echo outbursts. mine an orbital period of 90.4 or 88.5 min (post/pre-pe…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Equivalent widths and uncertainties for the most prominent ab￾sorption features in the high state for GOTO0650. Uncertainties are es￾timated via Monte Carlo resampling of the spectra. The EWs show an overall increase over time, with a marked jump around the time of th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The spectral of GOTO0650 split into high and low state for visualisation purposes. All spectra are flux-calibrated to contempora￾neous photometry, and corrected for Galactic extinction. Key spectral features are indicated by dashed lines, and the telescope and epoch o…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The NOT/ALFOSC gr7 spectrum of GOTO0650 obtained at +28.1 d, at the bottom of the decline off plateau (g ≈ 19). A 5-pixel variance-weighted boxcar filter has been applied to reduce noise. The inset panel is centred on the prominent Hα emission line, showing ten￾tative…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The Balmer lines as observed in the +36 d spectrum obtained at the peak of the first echo outburst. There are clear differences be￾tween the line profiles moving to higher-ionisation lines, with the vary￾ing line profiles well-explained by the differences in amplitude…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Posterior distributions from modelling of the available PanSTARRS photometry of GOTO0650 in quiescence. The reddening parameter is essentially prior-dominated, but a reasonable constraint on effective temperature is obtained. each chain (5× the integrated autocorrelat…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The fits and residuals to the seven X-ray spectra taken using the EP FXT instrument using an absorbed power law. X-ray observations of GW Lib and SSS J122222-311525 show a decline in X-ray flux from maximum optical light (Neustroev et al. 2018). The X-ray luminosity o…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging the Gap: OPTICAM Reveals the Hidden Spin of the WZ Sge Star GOTO 065054.49+593624.51

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 148.5 second periodic modulation in the g-band of GOTO 0650 during outburst decline is interpreted as the white dwarf spin period.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2010, ApJ, 711, 389 Bédard, A., Bergeron, P., Brassard, P., & Fontaine, G

    Aviles, A., Zharikov, S., Tovmassian, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 389 Bédard, A., Bergeron, P., Brassard, P., & Fontaine, G. 2020, ApJ, 901, 93

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002

    2019

  3. [3]

    R., Pala, A

    Belloni, D., Schreiber, M. R., Pala, A. F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5717

    2020

  4. [4]

    2016, Photutils: Photometry tools, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.011

    Bradley, L., Sipocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2016, Photutils: Photometry tools, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.011

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Bridging the Gap: OPTICAM Reveals the Hidden Spin of the WZ Sge Star GOTO 065054.49+593624.51

    Brown, T. M., Baliber, N., Bianco, F. B., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 1031 Castro Segura, N., Irving, Z. A., Vincentelli, F. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.11669

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

    2019

  8. [8]

    J., Ackley, K., Jiménez-Ibarra, F., et al

    Dyer, M. J., Ackley, K., Jiménez-Ibarra, F., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 13094, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X, ed. H. K. Marshall, J. Spyromilio, & T. Usuda, 130941X

    work page 2024

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    J., Dhillon, V

    Dyer, M. J., Dhillon, V . S., Littlefair, S., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 10704, Observa- tory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems VII, 107040C

    2018

  2. [10]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63

    1999

  3. [11]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 Gaia Collaboration, Montegriffo, P., Bellazzini, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A33

    2013

  4. [12]

    L., Kemper, E., & Suntzeff, N

    Gilliland, R. L., Kemper, E., & Suntzeff, N. 1986, ApJ, 301, 252

    1986

  5. [13]

    M., Cheng, F., et al

    Godon, P., Sion, E. M., Cheng, F., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 1018

    2006

  6. [14]

    & Nelson, L

    Goliasch, J. & Nelson, L. 2015, ApJ, 809, 80

    2015

  7. [15]

    & Weare, J

    Goodman, J. & Weare, J. 2010, Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 5, 65

    2010

  8. [16]

    2012, in IAU Symposium, V ol

    Grindlay, J., Tang, S., Los, E., & Servillat, M. 2012, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 285, New Horizons in Time Domain Astronomy, ed. E. Gri ffin, R. Hanisch, & R. Seaman, 29–34

    2012

  9. [17]

    K., Butterley, T., Dhillon, V

    Hardy, L. K., Butterley, T., Dhillon, V . S., Littlefair, S. P., & Wilson, R. W. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4316

    2015

  10. [18]

    2009, PASJ, 61, 697

    Hiroi, K., Moritani, Y ., Nogami, D., et al. 2009, PASJ, 61, 697

    2009

  11. [19]

    Holberg, J. B. & Bergeron, P. 2006, AJ, 132, 1221

    2006

  12. [20]

    & Marsh, T

    Horne, K. & Marsh, T. R. 1986, MNRAS, 218, 761

    1986

  13. [21]

    B., Nelson, L

    Howell, S. B., Nelson, L. A., & Rappaport, S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 897

    2001

  14. [22]

    T., Breedt, E., et al

    Inight, K., Gänsicke, B. T., Breedt, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 4867

    2023

  15. [23]

    T., Poyner, G., van Cauteren, P., & Vanmunster, T

    Jensen, L. T., Poyner, G., van Cauteren, P., & Vanmunster, T. 1995, The Messen- ger, 80, 43

    1995

  16. [24]

    2004, PASJ, 56, S109

    Kato, T., Nogami, D., Matsumoto, K., & Baba, H. 2004, PASJ, 56, S109

    2004

  17. [25]

    & Osaki, Y

    Kato, T. & Osaki, Y . 2013, PASJ, 65, 115

    2013

  18. [26]

    2011, ApJS, 194, 28

    Knigge, C., Baraffe, I., & Patterson, J. 2011, ApJS, 194, 28

    2011

  19. [27]

    S., Shappee, B

    Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502

    2017

  20. [28]

    L., Babusiaux, C., & Cox, N

    Lallement, R., Vergely, J. L., Babusiaux, C., & Cox, N. L. J. 2022, A&A, 661, A147

    2022

  21. [29]

    W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M., & Roweis, S

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M., & Roweis, S. 2010, AJ, 139, 1782

    2010

  22. [30]

    Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447

    1976

  23. [31]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.16279

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    H., Harbeck, D.-R., et al

    McCully, C., V olgenau, N. H., Harbeck, D.-R., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 10707, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy V , ed. J. C. Guzman & J. Ib- sen, 107070K

    2018

  25. [33]

    & Meyer-Hofmeister, E

    Meyer, F. & Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 2015, PASJ, 67, 52

    2015

  26. [34]

    V ., Page, K

    Neustroev, V . V ., Page, K. L., Kuulkers, E., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A13

    2018

  27. [35]

    & Meyer, F

    Osaki, Y . & Meyer, F. 2002, A&A, 383, 574

    2002

  28. [36]

    F., Gänsicke, B

    Pala, A. F., Gänsicke, B. T., Breedt, E., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3799

    2020

  29. [37]

    F., Gänsicke, B

    Pala, A. F., Gänsicke, B. T., Townsley, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2855 Article number, page 12 of 14 Killestein et al.: GOTO0650: a high amplitude dwarf nova

    2017

  30. [38]

    F., Schmidtobreick, L., Tappert, C., Gänsicke, B

    Pala, A. F., Schmidtobreick, L., Tappert, C., Gänsicke, B. T., & Mehner, A. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 2523

    2018

  31. [39]

    2011, MNRAS, 411, 2695

    Patterson, J. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2695

    2011

  32. [40]

    A., et al

    Patterson, J., Augusteijn, T., Harvey, D. A., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 748

    1996

  33. [41]

    R., et al

    Patterson, J., Kemp, J., Skillman, D. R., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 1290

    1998

  34. [42]

    W., et al

    Patterson, J., Masi, G., Richmond, M. W., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 721

    2002

  35. [43]

    S., Steele, I

    Piascik, A. S., Steele, I. A., Bates, S. D., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 9147, Ground- based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V , ed. S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 91478H

    2014

  36. [44]

    2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

    Prochaska, J., Hennawi, J., Westfall, K., et al. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

    2020

  37. [45]

    E., Garnavich, P., et al

    Ridden-Harper, R., Tucker, B. E., Garnavich, P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 5551

    2019

  38. [46]

    Roming, P. W. A., Kennedy, T. E., Mason, K. O., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 95

    2005

  39. [47]

    Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835

    1982

  40. [48]

    R., Belloni, D., & Schwope, A

    Schreiber, M. R., Belloni, D., & Schwope, A. D. 2024, A&A, 682, L7

    2024

  41. [49]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

    2014

  42. [50]

    2018, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 128, 75

    Shears, J. 2018, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 128, 75

    2018

  43. [51]

    W., Young, D

    Shingles, L., Smith, K. W., Young, D. R., et al. 2021, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 7, 1

    2021

  44. [52]

    K., Ackley, K., et al

    Steeghs, D., Galloway, D. K., Ackley, K., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2405

    2022

  45. [53]

    A., Smith, R

    Steele, I. A., Smith, R. J., Rees, P. C., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical In- strumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 5489, Ground-based Telescopes, ed. J. Oschmann, Jacobus M., 679–692

    2004

  46. [54]

    2004, AJ, 128, 1882

    Szkody, P., Henden, A., Fraser, O., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1882

    2004

  47. [55]

    2021, PASJ, 73, 753

    Tampo, Y ., Isogai, K., Kojiguchi, N., et al. 2021, PASJ, 73, 753

    2021

  48. [56]

    2023, PASJ, 75, 619

    Tampo, Y ., Kato, T., Kojiguchi, N., et al. 2023, PASJ, 75, 619

    2023

  49. [57]

    L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A

    Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A. N., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 064505

    2018

  50. [58]

    L., Stubbs, C

    Tonry, J. L., Stubbs, C. W., Lykke, K. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 99

    2012

  51. [59]

    T., Echevarria, J., Zharikov, S., & Ramirez, A

    Tovmassian, G., Gänsicke, B. T., Echevarria, J., Zharikov, S., & Ramirez, A. 2022, ApJ, 939, 14

    2022

  52. [60]

    E., Bergeron, P., & Gianninas, A

    Tremblay, P. E., Bergeron, P., & Gianninas, A. 2011, ApJ, 730, 128 Van Grootel, V ., Dupret, M. A., Fontaine, G., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A87

    2011

  53. [61]

    L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N

    Vergely, J. L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N. L. J. 2022, A&A, 664, A174 V oges, W., Aschenbach, B., Boller, T., et al. 1999, A&A, 349, 389

    2022

  54. [62]

    2003, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge University Press)

    Warner, B. 2003, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge University Press)

    2003

  55. [63]

    F., Sion, E

    Welsh, W. F., Sion, E. M., Godon, P., et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 509

    2003

  56. [64]

    2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed

    Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y ., & Ling, Z. 2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Sangangelo, 86 1 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Turku, Vesilin- nantie 5, Turku, FI-20014, Finland. 2 Department of Physics, University of Warw...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.