Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Euclidean Domains with Nearly Maximal Yamabe Quotient

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read If the Yamabe quotient of a domain in R3 is nearly maximal, the domain is nearly a ball.

desk verdict New quantitative stability theorems for Escobar's Yamabe inequality in R³, built with capacitary level sets and a medial-axis flow; the core holds up and the two main gaps are repairable. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12347 v1 pith:GJUFAWSR submitted 2025-01-21 math.DG math.AP

Liam Mazurowski , Xuan Yao This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 53C2153C24
keywords Yamabequotientconformalinvariantstabilityofrigiditycapacitarypotentialalmost-umbilicestimatemedialaxisGromov-Hausdorffdistancequasi-conformalitycoefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a quantitative stability theorem for the sharp conformal inequality Q(Ω) ≤ Q(B): if a smooth, bounded domain Ω in R3 with connected boundary has Yamabe quotient within δ of the ball's Yamabe quotient, then Ω is close to a ball in a precise sense. Concretely, for every ε>0 there is δ>0 such that Q(B)-Q(Ω)<δ implies B(x,r) ⊂ Ω ⊂ B(x,r(1+ε)), and after scaling Ω is Gromov-Hausdorff ε-close to the unit ball with its induced length metric; for δ small enough Ω is diffeomorphic to a ball. The proof works through level sets of the capacitary potential of the exterior domain, converting the deficit Q(B)-Q(Ω) into a weighted integral of the trace-free second fundamental form of those level sets, then applying an almost-umbilic estimate and a medial-axis flow argument. The same results hold for the boundary Sobolev quotient, and the paper shows that geometric features known to make the quasi-conformal coefficient large—spikes, ridges, and hairs—force a definite Yamabe deficit as well.

What carries the argument

The engine is the capacitary potential u of the exterior domain: Δu = 0 outside Ω, u = 1 on ∂Ω, u → 0 at infinity, and its logarithm w = −log u, whose level sets Σ_t = {w = t} foliate the exterior. The paper computes two level-set quantities, W(t) = ∫_{Σ_t} |∇w|^2 and U(t) = ∫_{Σ_t} H|∇w|, and uses monotonicity formulas from [34] to get ODE-type inequalities W′(t) = 2W(t) − U(t) and U′(t) ≤ 8π − U(t) + W(t) − ⋯, with equality for balls. A carefully chosen test function f = s(w)|∇w|^{1/2} with s(t) = $e^{{t/2}}$(1 + $e^{{2t}}$)^{-1/2} is then substituted into the Yamabe quotient of the exterior domain; the monotonicity formulas show its quotient is at most Q*(B), and tracking the losses yields a weighted bound ∫ b(τ) ∫_{Σ_τ} ∥Å∥^2 da dτ ≤ Q*(B) − Q*(Ω). A small deficit therefore produces a level set with small total trace-free second fundamental form; the almost-umbilic estimate [15] turns that into closeness to a round sphere, and a capacity comparison (Proposition 27) propagates roundness to ∂Ω. For the interior-domain results, conformal inversion and the medial-axis flow [29] are used to select a smallest ball B(x,r) ⊂ Ω whose boundary touches ∂Ω in two separated directions; the structural proposition applies to every such ball, and the flow pushes out a contradiction unless Ω already lies in B(x, r(1+ε)).

What would settle it

Find one smooth bounded domain with connected boundary whose Yamabe quotient is closer than δ to Q(B) but which contains a long thin hair or neck, so that no ball satisfies B(x,r) ⊂ Ω ⊂ B(x,r(1+ε)) for a fixed small ε; the theorem predicts this cannot happen. A more targeted check is to compute the capacitary potential of a solid torus and inspect its regular level sets: a disconnected regular level set would invalidate the level-set connectedness assumption without changing the hypothesis on ∂Ω.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a stability theorem: the sharp inequality Q(Ω) ≤ Q(B)—where Q is the Yamabe quotient of a smooth bounded Euclidean domain and B is the unit ball, with equality exactly for balls—is quantitatively stable in R3. If Q(B)-Q(Ω) is smaller than δ, then Theorem 1 produces a ball B(x,r) with B(x,r) ⊂ Ω ⊂ B(x,r(1+ε)); Theorem 2 says that after translation and scaling the domain, equipped with its induced length metric, is Gromov-Hausdorff ε-close to the unit ball; Theorem 3 says a sufficiently small deficit forces Ω to be diffeomorphic to a ball. The authors compute the dependence δ = O($ε^{9}$) with a constant that is not explicit, and they transfer all three theorems to the Sobolev quotient Q(Ω, ∂Ω). The final section establishes a qualitative comparison with the coefficient of quasi-conformality K: spikes, ridges, and hairs, which are known to force K away from 1 by definite amounts [22], also force Q(B)-Q(Ω) to be bounded away from 0 by definite amounts.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the claim, cited to the authors' own prior preprint [33, Lemma 6] and not proved here, that when ∂Ω is connected every regular level set of w = −log u in the exterior domain is connected; Proposition 22's Gauss-Bonnet and Willmore estimates need closed connected level surfaces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Q(Ω) is within δ of Q(B), then for the same ε there is a two-sided ball inclusion with radii ratio 1+ε, so the deficit controls Hausdorff distance from a round ball in a quantitative way.
  • With the induced length metric, a nearly maximal quotient forces the domain to be Gromov-Hausdorff close to the unit ball, so geodesic distances inside Ω are nearly Euclidean at the scale of the domain.
  • A uniform deficit threshold guarantees Ω is diffeomorphic to a ball, so the stability regime is topologically trivial and the boundary is a smoothly embedded sphere.
  • The same stability holds for the Sobolev quotient Q(Ω, ∂Ω), so the result is not an artifact of the particular boundary term in the Yamabe functional.
  • Spikes, ridges, and hairs each force a definite gap Q(B) − Q(Ω) > δ > 0, matching the known quantitative lower bounds for the coefficient of quasi-conformality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the rate δ = O(ε^9), with a constant inherited from the almost-umbilic estimate [15], is probably not sharp; testing whether the exponent 9 can be lowered is a concrete open problem.
  • Editorial inference: all machinery is three-dimensional because the Gauss-Bonnet and Willmore controls act on closed surfaces in R3, so the theorem should not be expected to generalize verbatim to domains in R4 or higher.
  • Editorial inference: the spike/ridge/hair comparison suggests there may be a direct quantitative inequality between Q(B) − Q(Ω) and K(Ω) − 1 near the round ball; the paper does not state such an inequality, but its structural proposition is a natural tool for trying to prove one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies quantitative stability for Escobar's rigidity theorem in R3: for smooth bounded domains with connected boundary, the Yamabe quotient Q(Ω) is maximized by balls, and equality holds only for balls. The authors prove that if Q(B)−Q(Ω) is sufficiently small then Ω is Hausdorff-close to a ball (Theorem 1), GH-close to the unit ball in its induced length metric (Theorem 2), and diffeomorphic to a ball (Theorem 3), with the quantitative deficit δ=O(ε^9) recorded in Remark 5. The proof uses the capacitary potential of the exterior domain, a test function built from it, Miao's monotonicity formulas, the De Lellis–Müller almost-umbilic estimate, and medial-axis/flow arguments to convert a nearly round level set into containment of Ω in a slightly larger ball. A final section draws qualitative consequences for Gehring's coefficient of quasi-conformality in the presence of spikes, ridges, and hairs.

Significance. If correct, these results constitute a substantial advance: they give the first quantitative stability for the Euclidean Yamabe quotient of domains, confirming Escobar's heuristic that Q(Ω) measures distance from a ball, and they connect this invariant with quasiconformal geometry. The proof strategy is well suited to the problem: the test function is constructed from the capacitary potential without fitted parameters, the deficit is expressed through an explicit ∫|Å|² term, and the dependence on the De Lellis–Müller constant is stated honestly. The medial-axis arguments are original in this context and give a concrete route from a nearly umbilical level set to global containment. However, the proof of the main theorem contains a repairable gap in the case split, and a load-bearing connectivity lemma is cited to an unpublished preprint rather than proved; these issues must be fixed before the results can be considered established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 1] The case split in the proof of Theorem 1 is not exhaustive. Case 1 assumes there is x∈Ω with |x|≥1 and B(x,ε/2)⊂Ω, while Case 2 assumes that every x∈Ω with |x|≥1 satisfies d(x,∂Ω)≤ε/4. A point with ε/4<d(x,∂Ω)<ε/2 satisfies neither condition, and such points are not a priori excluded by the standing assumptions, including Proposition 35. The subsequent flow argument in Case 2 only needs the bound R≤ε/2: since R(C(ε,y))−R(y)≤ε/2, the average of ∥∇∥² over [0,ε] is at most 1/2, giving a time with ∥∇∥²≤1/2. Thus the gap is repairable by replacing ε/4 by ε/2 in Case 2, but as written the contradiction is not established for all configurations. This same gap propagates to Theorem 3, whose proof states that 'Case 1' gives R(x)≤ε/2 for x∈Ω\B(0,1); that statement belongs to the repaired Case 2.
  2. [Section 3.1, first paragraph and Proposition 22] The paper asserts without proof that connectedness of ∂Ω implies connectedness of every regular level set Σ_t={w=t}, citing [33, Lemma 6], an unpublished preprint by the same authors. This fact is load-bearing: Proposition 22 applies Gauss–Bonnet and the Willmore bound ∫H²≥16π for closed connected surfaces; if Σ_t had k components, the bounds would become 4πk and 16πk and the constant 8π in Proposition 22 would fail. The lemma is true by a standard strong-minimum-principle argument applied to the capacitary potential u in a bounded component of {u≤t}, but the manuscript should include that proof or cite a published, accessible reference instead of relying on an unpublished preprint.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3, Proposition 28] The interval for s is misstated: for t∈[−log(1−η/2), −log(1−η)], one has s=e^{−t}∈[1−η, 1−η/2], not s∈[η/2, η]; the displayed interval contradicts the statement '1−η<s<1' in the proposition.
  2. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 3] The phrase 'By Case 1 of the proof of Theorem 1' is incorrect; the needed fact, that R(x)≤ε/2 for every x∈Ω\B(0,1), comes from Case 2 (after the repair described above).
  3. [Section 5] The comparison with the coefficient of quasi-conformality is formulated for nonsmooth features such as spikes and ridges, whereas Q is only defined for smooth domains; the parenthetical smoothing argument should be made quantitative, since the smoothing scale affects the stated lower bound δ(1/10,θ(α)).
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical slips, including 'quasi-confromality' in Section 1.1 and 'Haussdorff' in Definition 36; these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: near-roundness is derived from Q via Miao monotonicity, De Lellis-Muller almost-umbilicity, and medial-axis flow, none of which is an input renamed as a conclusion; one load-bearing self-citation is independent support rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is not circular. The near-roundness conclusion is never assumed: the test function f = s(w)|∇w|^{1/2} is constructed from the capacitary potential with no parameter fitted to the target result, and the deficit estimate in Proposition 24 genuinely bounds the Willmore-type quantity ∫ b(τ)∫_{Στ}|˚A|^2 by Q*(B)-Q*(Ω). The subsequent steps (almost-umbilic estimate of De Lellis-Muller, the capacity comparison in Proposition 27, the conformal inversion argument in Proposition 35, and the medial-axis flow of Lieutier) convert that small |˚A|^2 into Hausdorff, Gromov-Hausdorff, and diffeomorphism closeness. The main external inputs—Miao's monotonicity formulas, the De Lellis-Muller estimate, and Gehring-Vaisala's quasiconformality bounds—are independent of the present authors and are not fitted to Ω. The only point of concern is Section 3.1, where 'The assumption that ∂Ω is connected ensures that Σ_t is connected for all regular values t (see [33, Lemma 6])' is cited to the authors' own preprint. This connectedness is used in Proposition 22 when applying Gauss-Bonnet and the Willmore energy estimate to closed connected surfaces, and Proposition 24 inherits it; so the self-citation is load-bearing in the proof. However, [33, Lemma 6] is a separate parameter-free geometric lemma whose assumptions do not include the Yamabe quotient or near-roundness, so it is independent support rather than a circular reduction of the theorem to itself. A missing proof of that lemma would be a gap, not evidence that the derivation is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof rests on external estimates from Miao, De Lellis-Muller, and Lieutier, plus a connected-level-set fact from the authors' own prior work. No constants are fitted to data; the arbitrary 45-degree angle in the definition of A(Ω) is not a fitted parameter because any fixed positive angle works and all proofs go through unchanged. No new geometric entity is postulated.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Miao's monotonicity formulas for the capacitary potential, including 3W(t)≤U(t)+4π, U(t)≥8π, W(t)≥4π, and the sharpened U(t)≥8π + ∫∫e^{-τ}|Å|² estimate.
    Invoked in Propositions 19 and 22 as the engine of the new proof of Escobar's inequality. These are external results from [34], not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption De Lellis-Muller almost-umbilic estimate: a closed surface with small ∫|Å|² is W^{2,2}-close to a round sphere with controlled parameters.
    Used in Proposition 29 to convert the small trace-free second fundamental form into explicit geometric closeness; the constant is non-explicit.
  • domain assumption Connectedness of every regular level set {w=t} for w=−log u whenever ∂Ω is connected.
    Invoked at the start of Section 3.1 and cited to [33, Lemma 6], a preprint by the same authors. Needed so that Gauss-Bonnet and the Willmore lower bound apply to each closed level surface.
  • domain assumption Lieutier's medial-axis flow C exists, is continuous, and satisfies the radius evolution identities R(C(t,x))=R(x)+∫∥∇(C(τ,x))∥²dτ.
    Used in Theorem 1 and Theorem 3 to locate a smaller ball in A(Ω) and to build the homotopy that proves diffeomorphism to a ball.
  • standard math Willmore inequality ∫H²≥16π for closed connected surfaces smoothly embedded in R3.
    Used in Proposition 22 and in the proof of Proposition 24 to obtain the sharpened lower bound on U(t).
  • standard math Gauss-Bonnet theorem ∫K=4π for each closed connected regular level surface.
    Used in Proposition 22 to replace the ∫(H²−2K) term by ∫K plus the Willmore term.
  • standard math Existence, smoothness, and decay of the capacitary potential u for smooth bounded domains, together with the asymptotic expansion of u near infinity.
    Used throughout Section 3 to define w=−log u and to justify integrability in Proposition 21.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Euclidean Domains with Nearly Maximal Yamabe Quotient." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GJUFAWSR

@misc{pith2026250112347,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Euclidean Domains with Nearly Maximal Yamabe Quotient},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GJUFAWSR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12347}
}
abstract

Let $\Omega$ be a smooth, bounded domain in $\mathbb R^3$ with connected boundary. It follows from work of Escobar that the Yamabe quotient of $\Omega$ is at most the Yamabe quotient of a ball, and equality holds if and only if $\Omega$ is a ball. We show that if equality almost holds then the following things are true: (i)$\Omega$ is diffeomorphic to a ball; (ii) There is a small number $\epsilon > 0$ such that $B(x,r) \subset \Omega \subset B(x,r(1+\epsilon))$; (iii) After suitable scaling, $\Omega$ is Gromov-Hausdorff close to the unit ball when considered as a metric space with its induced length metric. We also give a qualitative comparison between $Q$ and the coefficient of quasi-conformality studied in the theory of quasi-conformal maps.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sharp geometric inequalities for closed hypersurfaces in manifolds with nonnegative ricci curvature

    Virginia Agostiniani, Mattia Fogagnolo, and Lorenzo Mazzieri. Sharp geometric inequalities for closed hypersurfaces in manifolds with nonnegative ricci curvature. Inventiones mathematicae, 222(3):1033–1101, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Riemannian penrose inequality via nonlinear potential theory

    Virginia Agostiniani, Carlo Mantegazza, Lorenzo Mazzieri, and Francesca Oronzio. Riemannian penrose inequality via nonlinear potential theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11642 , 2022

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Monotonicity formulas in potential theory

    Virginia Agostiniani and Lorenzo Mazzieri. Monotonicity formulas in potential theory. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , 59(1):6, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    A green’s function proof of the positive mass theorem

    Virginia Agostiniani, Lorenzo Mazzieri, and Francesca Oronzio. A green’s function proof of the positive mass theorem. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 405(2):54, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    On the Stability of Llarull's Theorem in Dimension Three

    Brian Allen, Edward Bryden, and Demetre Kazaras. On the stability of llarull’s theorem in dimension three. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18567, 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    ´Equations diff´ erentielles non lin´ eaires et probleme de yamabe concernant la courbure scalaire.J

    Thierry Aubin. ´Equations diff´ erentielles non lin´ eaires et probleme de yamabe concernant la courbure scalaire.J. Math. Pures Appl.(9) , 55:269–296, 1976

    work page 1976

  7. [7]

    Minkowski Inequality on complete Riemannian manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature

    Luca Benatti, Mattia Fogagnolo, and Lorenzo Mazzieri. Minkowski inequality on complete riemannian manifolds with nonnegative ricci curvature. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06063 , 2021

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    A transformation for extracting new descriptions of shape

    Harry Blum. A transformation for extracting new descriptions of shape. Models for the perception of speech and visual form , pages 362–380, 1967

    work page 1967

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Harmonic functions and the mass of 3-dimensional asymptotically flat riemannian manifolds

    Hubert L Bray, Demetre P Kazaras, Marcus A Khuri, and Daniel L Stern. Harmonic functions and the mass of 3-dimensional asymptotically flat riemannian manifolds. The Journal of Geometric Analysis , 32(6):184, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Monotonicity of the p-green functions

    Pak-Yeung Chan, Jianchun Chu, Man-Chun Lee, and Tin-Yau Tsang. Monotonicity of the p-green functions. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2024(9):7998–8025, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Problemes de neumann non lin´ eaires sur les vari´ et´ es riemanniennes.Journal of Functional Analysis, 57(2):154–206, 1984

    Pascal Cherrier. Problemes de neumann non lin´ eaires sur les vari´ et´ es riemanniennes.Journal of Functional Analysis, 57(2):154–206, 1984

    1984

  4. [12]

    New monotonicity formulas for ricci curvature and applications

    Tobias Holck Colding. New monotonicity formulas for ricci curvature and applications. i. Acta Math, 209:229–263, 2012

    2012

  5. [13]

    Ricci curvature and monotonicity for harmonic functions

    Tobias Holck Colding and William P Minicozzi. Ricci curvature and monotonicity for harmonic functions. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , 49:1045–1059, 2014. 24 LIAM MAZUROWSKI AND XUAN YAO

    2014

  6. [14]

    Singularities of ricci flow and diffeomorphisms

    Tobias Holck Colding and William P Minicozzi II. Singularities of ricci flow and diffeomorphisms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06240, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Optimal rigidity estimates for nearly umbilical surfaces.Journal of Differential Geometry, 69(1):075–110, 2005

    Camillo De Lellis and Stefan M¨ uller. Optimal rigidity estimates for nearly umbilical surfaces.Journal of Differential Geometry, 69(1):075–110, 2005

    2005

  8. [16]

    Some stability results of positive mass theorem for uniformly asymptotically flat 3-manifolds

    Conghan Dong. Some stability results of positive mass theorem for uniformly asymptotically flat 3-manifolds. Annales math´ ematiques du Qu´ ebec, pages 1–25, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Stability for the 3d riemannian penrose inequality

    Conghan Dong. Stability for the 3d riemannian penrose inequality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10299 , 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Stability of euclidean 3-space for the positive mass theorem

    Conghan Dong and Antoine Song. Stability of euclidean 3-space for the positive mass theorem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07414, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Conformal deformation of a riemannian metric to a scalar flat metric with constant mean curvature on the boundary

    Jos´ e F Escobar. Conformal deformation of a riemannian metric to a scalar flat metric with constant mean curvature on the boundary. Annals of Mathematics , 136(1):1–50, 1992

    1992

  12. [20]

    The yamabe problem on manifolds with boundary.Journal of Differential Geometry , 35(1):21–84, 1992

    Jos´ e F Escobar. The yamabe problem on manifolds with boundary.Journal of Differential Geometry , 35(1):21–84, 1992

    1992

  13. [21]

    Rings and quasiconformal mappings in space

    Frederick W Gehring. Rings and quasiconformal mappings in space. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 103(3):353–393, 1962

    1962

  14. [22]

    The coefficients of quasiconformality of domains in space.Acta Mathematica, 114(1):1– 70, 1965

    FW Gehring and J V¨ ais¨ al¨ a. The coefficients of quasiconformality of domains in space.Acta Mathematica, 114(1):1– 70, 1965

    1965

  15. [23]

    Monotone quantities of p-harmonic functions and their applications

    Sven Hirsch, Pengzi Miao, and Luen-Fai Tam. Monotone quantities of p-harmonic functions and their applications. Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly , 20(2):599–644, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Stability of llarull’s theorem in all dimensions.Advances in Mathematics, 458:109980, 2024

    Sven Hirsch and Yiyue Zhang. Stability of llarull’s theorem in all dimensions.Advances in Mathematics, 458:109980, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    The inverse mean curvature flow and the riemannian penrose inequality

    Gerhard Huisken and Tom Ilmanen. The inverse mean curvature flow and the riemannian penrose inequality. Journal of Differential Geometry , 59(3):353–437, 2001

    2001

  18. [26]

    Unconstrained degrees of freedom for gravitational waves, beta-foliations and spherically symmetric initial data

    Jacek Jezierski and Jerzy Kijowski. Unconstrained degrees of freedom for gravitational waves, beta-foliations and spherically symmetric initial data. arXiv preprint gr-qc/0501073 , 2005

    2005 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Stability of the positive mass theorem under ricci curvature lower bounds

    Demetre Kazaras, Marcus Khuri, and Dan Lee. Stability of the positive mass theorem under ricci curvature lower bounds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05202 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Unconstrained degrees of freedom of gravitational field and the positivity of gravitational energy

    J Kijowski. Unconstrained degrees of freedom of gravitational field and the positivity of gravitational energy. Gravitation, Geometry and Relativistic Physics , 212:40, 1984

    1984

  21. [29]

    Any open bounded subset of Rn has the same homotopy type as its medial axis

    Andr´ e Lieutier. Any open bounded subset of Rn has the same homotopy type as its medial axis. Computer-Aided Design, 36(11):1029–1046, 2004

    2004

  22. [30]

    Monotone quantities for p-harmonic functions and the sharp p-penrose inequality

    Liam Mazurowski and Xuan Yao. Monotone quantities for p-harmonic functions and the sharp p-penrose inequality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19784 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    The yamabe invariant of RP3 via harmonic functions

    Liam Mazurowski and Xuan Yao. The yamabe invariant of RP3 via harmonic functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00854, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Mass, conformal capacity, and the volumetric penrose inequality

    Liam Mazurowski and Xuan Yao. Mass, conformal capacity, and the volumetric penrose inequality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09626, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    On the stability of the yamabe invariant of s3

    Liam Mazurowski and Xuan Yao. On the stability of the yamabe invariant of s3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00815, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Mass, capacitary functions, and the mass-to-capacity ratio

    Pengzi Miao. Mass, capacitary functions, and the mass-to-capacity ratio. Peking Mathematical Journal, pages 1–54, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Comparison theorems for three-dimensional manifolds with scalar curvature bound

    Ovidiu Munteanu and Jiaping Wang. Comparison theorems for three-dimensional manifolds with scalar curvature bound. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.12103 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Adm mass, area and capacity in asymptotically flat 3-manifolds with nonnegative scalar cur- vature

    Francesca Oronzio. Adm mass, area and capacity in asymptotically flat 3-manifolds with nonnegative scalar cur- vature. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.06688 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Conformal deformation of a riemannian metric to constant scalar curvature.Journal of Differential Geometry, 20(2):479–495, 1984

    Richard Schoen. Conformal deformation of a riemannian metric to constant scalar curvature.Journal of Differential Geometry, 20(2):479–495, 1984

    1984

  30. [38]

    On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity

    Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau. On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity. Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics , 65:45–76, 1979

    1979

  31. [39]

    Monotonicity of the yamabe invariant under connect sum over the boundary

    Fernando Schwartz. Monotonicity of the yamabe invariant under connect sum over the boundary. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry , 35:115–131, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Scalar curvature and harmonic maps to s1

    Daniel L Stern. Scalar curvature and harmonic maps to s1. Journal of Differential Geometry, 122(2):259–269, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Remarks concerning the conformal deformation of riemannian structures on compact manifolds

    Neil S Trudinger. Remarks concerning the conformal deformation of riemannian structures on compact manifolds. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Classe di Scienze , 22(2):265–274, 1968

    1968

  34. [42]

    A new proof of the positive energy theorem

    Edward Witten. A new proof of the positive energy theorem. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 80(3):381– 402, 1981

    1981

  35. [43]

    New monotonicity for p-capacitary functions in 3-manifolds with non- negative scalar curvature

    Chao Xia, Jiabin Yin, and Xingjian Zhou. New monotonicity for p-capacitary functions in 3-manifolds with non- negative scalar curvature. Advances in Mathematics , 440:109526, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    On a deformation of riemannian structures on compact manifolds

    Hidehiko Yamabe. On a deformation of riemannian structures on compact manifolds. Osaka Mathematical Journal, 12(1):21–37, 1960

    1960

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.