Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

PairJudge RM: Perform Best-of-N Sampling with Knockout Tournament

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.13007 v2 pith:F3GCK6BL submitted 2025-01-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsparijudgerewardcandidateknockoutpairwisesamplingsolutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Best-of-N (BoN) sampling, a common strategy for test-time scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs), relies on reward models to select the best candidate solution from multiple generations. However, traditional reward models often assign arbitrary and inconsistent scores, limiting their effectiveness. To address this, we propose a Pairwise Judge Reward Model (PariJudge RM) combined with a knockout tournament for BoN sampling. Instead of assigning absolute scores, given one math problem, PariJudge RM judges two candidate solutions' correctness with chain-of-thought reasoning simultaneously. This approach eliminates the need for scoring and enables cross-validation of solutions through parallel judgment. In the knockout tournament, PariJudge RM conducts pairwise Judgment between candidate solutions and eliminates the incorrect ones iteratively. We construct PairJudge-432K, a large-scale dataset of 432K pairwise judgments derived from NumiaMath and annotated using \texttt{gemini-1.5-flash}, and train the PariJudge RM via supervised fine-tuning. Experiments on MATH-500 and the Olympiad Bench demonstrate significant improvements over baseline reward models. And a 40\% to 60\% relative improvement is achieved on the top 50\% challenging problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Z-Reward: Beyond Scalar Rewards by Internalizing Reasoning into Score Distributions

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Z-Reward trains a 27B reasoning teacher VLM on score distributions via GDSO and distills it via RISD into a 9B student, reaching 89.6% and 88.6% human preference accuracy with 41.3% optimization gain over SFT baseline.

  2. GenSelect: A Generative Approach to Best-of-N

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Asking a reasoning LLM to compare and select the best among N math solutions at once beats pointwise scoring and majority voting on competition math benchmarks.

  3. Reward Reasoning Model

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Reward models that think before judging, trained via reinforcement learning without human-written reasoning traces, outperform standard reward models and improve with more test-time compute.

Pith tools