Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models as Theory of Mind Aware Generative Agents with Counterfactual Reflection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.15355 v1 pith:SYXRCAVA submitted 2025-01-26 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords tom-agentagentsgenerativementalstatesbdisbehaviorsconfidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent studies have increasingly demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) possess significant theory of mind (ToM) capabilities, showing the potential for simulating the tracking of mental states in generative agents. In this study, we propose a novel paradigm called ToM-agent, designed to empower LLMs-based generative agents to simulate ToM in open-domain conversational interactions. ToM-agent disentangles the confidence from mental states, facilitating the emulation of an agent's perception of its counterpart's mental states, such as beliefs, desires, and intentions (BDIs). Using past conversation history and verbal reflections, ToM-Agent can dynamically adjust counterparts' inferred BDIs, along with related confidence levels. We further put forth a counterfactual intervention method that reflects on the gap between the predicted responses of counterparts and their real utterances, thereby enhancing the efficiency of reflection. Leveraging empathetic and persuasion dialogue datasets, we assess the advantages of implementing the ToM-agent with downstream tasks, as well as its performance in both the first-order and the \textit{second-order} ToM. Our findings indicate that the ToM-agent can grasp the underlying reasons for their counterpart's behaviors beyond mere semantic-emotional supporting or decision-making based on common sense, providing new insights for studying large-scale LLMs-based simulation of human social behaviors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Zing: Social Mind for LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Coordinated evaluation (SoMBench), staged training (Zing), and typed inference supports (Actio) measurably improve LLM social reasoning, with large remaining headroom on a 3,481-item benchmark.

  2. Towards High-Level Semantic Intelligence

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey proposing that AI's next stage should be understood as High-Level Semantic Intelligence: mastering humor, sarcasm, metaphor, empathy, persuasion, and narrative across modalities.

  3. Causal MAS: A Survey of Large Language Model Architectures for Discovery and Effect Estimation

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey that defines and catalogs multi-agent LLM systems for causal reasoning, discovery, and effect estimation, including their architectures, benchmarks, and applications.

Pith tools