Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Large Language Models to Diffusion Finetuning

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Finetuning with L2D makes LLM accuracy rise monotonically with diffusion steps.

desk verdict Genuinely novel method, well-engineered, but math benchmark contamination undermines the test-time scaling headline; worth refereeing with mandatory contamination checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15781 v2 pith:IXWHSV5R submitted 2025-01-27 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Edoardo Cetin , Tianyu Zhao , Yujin Tang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords diffusionlanguagemodelstest-timecomputescalingLLMfinetuningcross-entropyrectifiedflowclassifier-freeguidanceadaptiveODEsolversautoregressiveLLMs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes L2D, a finetuning method that turns a frozen, cross-entropy-pretrained LLM into a diffusion model without modifying the original weights. Its central claim is that accuracy on downstream tasks rises monotonically as the number of diffusion steps at inference grows, and that a single diffusion step reproduces the original model's single-step output. The authors report consistent gains over base models and over LoRA and full finetuning baselines across four LMs on GSM8K, MATH, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU, and MMLU-Pro, and show that L2D composes with beam search, chain-of-thought prompting, and RL-distilled reasoning models. In short, the method turns test-time compute into monotone accuracy gains without sacrificing autoregressive behavior.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the parallel diffusion path $f_{\theta_d}$, a compact transformer initialized from the frozen LM's own layers and optimized with LoRA, which consumes a noised token embedding $x_t$ and outputs vocabulary logits. A timestep-conditioned gate $w_d(t) = w_{\theta_d}(t) - w_{\theta_d}(0)$ forces the path to vanish at $t=0$, which is the mechanism that preserves the original single-step output. The path is trained with a cross-entropy loss rather than mean-squared error, tying the diffusion objective directly to next-token prediction, and inference follows the constant-velocity ODE $dx_t = (\hat{x} - x_t)/(1-t)\, dt$, which turns iterative token sampling into a continuous denoising trajectory.

What would settle it

Retrain L2D on the same corpus with metamathqa-50k and numina-cot-100k removed, then measure GSM8K and MATH accuracy as a function of diffusion steps; if the accuracy-versus-steps curve flattens or the large gains disappear, the monotone-scaling claim rests on train/evaluation overlap.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

L2D recasts next-token prediction as the single-step case of a continuous diffusion process over token embeddings. During training, the base LM is frozen and a small parallel diffusion path $f_{\theta_d}$ is trained with cross-entropy to predict the target token from the interpolated embedding $x_t = t x_1 + (1-t) x_0$ across all timesteps $t$. During inference, the model starts from pure noise $x_0 \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^2 I)$, repeatedly samples a token embedding $\hat{x}$ from its logits, and integrates the rectified-flow ODE $dx_t = (\hat{x} - x_t)/(1-t)\, dt$. The paper's claim is that this procedure yields monotonically increasing accuracy with more steps, that one step equals the original model, and that the added parameters are a small fraction of the base LM's size.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim that accuracy rises monotonically with diffusion steps rests on the benchmark gains being genuine, but the training corpus contains metamathqa-50k and numina-cot-100k, datasets derived from the same families as GSM8K and MATH, so the reported math improvements may be partly memorization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A user can trade compute for accuracy on demand: more diffusion steps yield monotonically higher scores up to the tested budgets, with over 90% of the gain available at the default 15-step budget.
  • Because the original weights are never modified, L2D can be applied on top of instruction-tuned, LoRA-tuned, or fully finetuned checkpoints, and it recovers coding performance that full finetuning degrades.
  • Classifier-free guidance makes one L2D model switchable between general and task-specialist modes by adjusting the guidance strength $w_g$.
  • Adaptive ODE solvers let the model spend compute per token; knowledge-heavy tasks like MMLU and MMLU-Pro trigger more steps than arithmetic word problems, reducing reliance on hand-written chain-of-thought prompts.
  • Because the objective is cross-entropy, the method is claimed to apply to any foundation model pretrained with that loss, not only the four models tested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: the training corpus includes metamathqa-50k and numina-cot-100k, which are built from the same problem families as GSM8K and MATH, so the headline math improvements are likely upper bounds until re-measured on problem sets that provably do not overlap with training.
  • Editorial: if the monotone scaling curve is real, the per-token step counts emitted by the adaptive solver could be reused as a difficulty signal for sampling or reward shaping, a direction the paper only gestures at in future work.
  • Editorial: monotonicity is reported on a single 1B model up to 127 steps; whether the curve continues, flattens, or later bends downward at much larger budgets remains an open empirical question.
  • Editorial: since the diffusion path is initialized from the LM's own blocks, the approach may carry over to non-transformer architectures that still provide token embeddings and cross-entropy logits, though the paper does not test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes L2D, a method that appends a parallel diffusion path—trained with a cross-entropy loss on noisy token embeddings—to a frozen pre-trained LLM, enabling iterative denoising at inference time. The authors report performance gains across math, coding, and general-knowledge tasks on Llama 3.2 1B, Qwen 2.5 1.5B/7B, and Llama 3.1 8B, and claim monotonic accuracy improvements with more diffusion steps, preserved single-step capabilities, and compatibility with classifier-free guidance and adaptive ODE solvers.

Significance. If the reported results are robust, L2D is a novel and parameter-efficient way to endow autoregressive LLMs with test-time compute scaling while leaving the base model's one-step behavior unchanged. The paper's strengths include a clean architectural design that reuses the frozen LM path, thorough ablations (learning rate, sigma, initialization, velocity computation, solvers, schedules), and publicly available code. However, the empirical validation is currently compromised by overlap between the training corpus and the math evaluation benchmarks, and by an overstated monotonicity claim. The central test-time-scaling thesis is therefore not yet convincingly established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix B.1, Table 1] The training corpus includes metamathqa-50k, which is constructed by rewriting GSM8K and MATH problems, and numina-cot-100k, which overlaps with competition math problems; these are the same benchmarks used for evaluation (GSM8K and MATH in Table 1). The paper reports no overlap analysis, n-gram deduplication, or evaluation on an uncontaminated math benchmark. As a result, the large math improvements (e.g., Llama 3.2 1B GSM8K 13.86→38.86; Qwen 2.5 7B GSM8K 5.61→82.80) may be substantially inflated by memorization of test-derived data, and the central claim that L2D provides general test-time compute scaling is not established on the tasks where it looks strongest. The authors should either remove all test-derived data from training, measure and report overlap rates, or add results on a held-out math benchmark (e.g., AIME 2024 or a freshly collected set) with the same evaluation protocol.
  2. [Abstract, Table 18] The abstract claims that 'by increasing the number of diffusion steps, we show our finetuned models achieve monotonically increasing accuracy,' but Table 18 shows per-task decreases on general-knowledge tasks: MMLU drops from 41.99 at 15 steps to 41.87 at 127 steps, and MMLU-Pro drops from 15.35 to 14.96. Monotonicity holds only for the aggregate average or for certain task subsets. The claim should be qualified (e.g., 'on average' or 'on the math and coding tasks') and the per-task behavior should be discussed, since the unqualified statement is contradicted by the authors' own full results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (7)] The classifier-free guidance formula uses (1 - w_g) rather than the standard (w_g - 1) term. With w_g > 1, the expression as written mixes toward the unconditional prediction instead of pushing away from it. Please verify the sign and ensure the equation matches the implementation.
  2. [Table 14] The parameter count for Llama 3.2 1B full finetuning is listed as 7615M, which appears to be a copy-paste error from the 8B model; it should be 1235M.
  3. [Figure 1] Figure 1 reports the aggregate scaling curve but no per-task breakdown or variance across seeds; adding per-task curves or a small table would help readers assess the monotonicity claim.
  4. [Table 17] The column header 'Paramseters' contains a typo; it should read 'Parameters'.
  5. [Section 4.3, Table 18] The 'tuned w_g' results appear to select the guidance strength based on test-set performance. Please clarify whether a validation split was used and report the selected w_g values per task category.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: L2D's scaling behavior is empirical, and the single-step preservation property is an explicit construction, not a disguised prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical: L2D trains a LoRA diffusion path with a cross-entropy loss (Eq. 3) and measures accuracy at increasing diffusion-step budgets on evaluation benchmarks; the monotone scaling shown in Figure 1 is a reported measurement, not a quantity forced by a fitted parameter or by the loss definition. The parametrization wd(t) = wθd(t) - wθd(0) (Eq. 6) does make the t = 0 output equal to the frozen base LM by construction, but the paper explicitly presents this as an intended design property ('this practice ensures that L2D will never trade off the powerful single-step capabilities of the pre-trained LM'), not as an empirically derived prediction, so it is a transparent construction rather than circular reasoning. The training-data overlap concern involving metamathqa-50k and numina-cot-100k (Appendix B.1) is a validity threat to the evaluation and to the test-time-scaling claim, but it is not a derivation step that reduces to its own inputs. The reference list contains no self-citations by the present authors, and no 'uniqueness theorem' or load-bearing prior result is imported from the authors' own earlier work to force the method's choices. Therefore, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard flow-matching mathematics, on CDCD-style cross-entropy diffusion assumptions, and on the implicit cleanliness of the math evaluation benchmarks. The benchmark-cleanliness assumption is the most fragile, because the training corpus includes MetaMathQA and NuminaMath-CoT, which overlap with GSM8K and MATH. The method introduces no new physical or conceptual entities beyond the architectural 'diffusion path', which is a parameterized module, not an invented entity.

free parameters (3)
  • sigma (base distribution noise scale) = 64
    Defines the signal-to-noise schedule; tuned via ablation over 32, 64, 128 in Table 7 with best average at 64 (35.50 vs 34.96 and 34.75).
  • d-bar (diffusion embedding dimension) = 256
    Dimensionality of the diffusion token space; chosen in Section 4.1; the paper notes d-bar=16 could lower parameter count.
  • wg (classifier-free guidance strength) = Tuned per domain (e.g., 3 for math, 1.5 for coding)
    Extension hyperparameter swept in Table 19; the 'tuned wg' row in Table 2 selects the best per-domain value on the evaluation set.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Gaussian corruption process and the rectified-flow ODE define a valid generative process for token embeddings.
    Sections 2.1-2.3 assume the flow-matching theory of Liu et al. (2022) and Lipman et al. (2024), including the constant-velocity ODE dxt = (x-hat - xt)/(1-t) dt, without re-deriving it.
  • domain assumption Cross-entropy loss on normalized token embeddings is a valid training objective for continuous diffusion over categorical data.
    Adopted from Dieleman et al. (2022) in Section 2.2; the paper uses this equivalence as the basis of the L2D loss (Eq. 3) without proving it.
  • domain assumption Unit-norm rescaling of vocabulary embeddings in Eq. 5 keeps the diffusion process well-conditioned.
    Section 3.2 relies on Dieleman et al. (2022) to prevent unbounded embedding magnitudes from minimizing the corruption effect.
  • domain assumption Evaluation benchmarks GSM8K and MATH are not substantially memorized from the L2D training corpus.
    Implicit in the evaluation design of Section 4; questionable because Appendix B.1 includes metamathqa-50k, a dataset constructed from GSM8K and MATH rewrites, and numina-cot-100k, which contains overlapping competition math problems.
  • domain assumption Zero-initialized output weighting wd(0) = 0 preserves the original LM's single-step behavior while allowing the diffusion path to take over for t > 0.
    Section 3.2, Eq. 6. The T=1 preservation is exact by construction, but the claim that the path learns a useful denoising trajectory is an empirical inductive-bias assumption.
  • domain assumption Sampling an individual token embedding, rather than taking the expectation over the vocabulary, yields a valid stochastic ODE velocity with beneficial self-correction.
    Section 2.3 and Appendix C.4; the paper relies on this empirical choice, citing Karras et al. (2022) for the benefit of stochasticity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Language Models to Diffusion Finetuning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IXWHSV5R

@misc{pith2026250115781,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Language Models to Diffusion Finetuning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IXWHSV5R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15781}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a new finetuning method to provide pre-trained large language models (LMs) the ability to scale test-time compute through the diffusion framework. By increasing the number of diffusion steps, we show our finetuned models achieve monotonically increasing accuracy, directly translating to improved performance across downstream tasks. Furthermore, our finetuned models can expertly answer questions on specific topics by integrating powerful guidance techniques, and autonomously determine the compute required for a given problem by leveraging adaptive ODE solvers. Our method is universally applicable to any foundation model pre-trained with a cross-entropy loss and does not modify any of its original weights, fully preserving its strong single-step generation capabilities. We show our method is more effective and fully compatible with traditional finetuning approaches, introducing an orthogonal new direction to unify the strengths of the autoregressive and diffusion frameworks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15781 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Test-time compute scaling with L2D. Our framework empowers LMs with the scaling properties of diffusion, yielding increasingly higher inference performance with additional steps. Established as the predominant approach in visual domains, the diffusion framework offers properties that appear partic￾ularly complementary to the LM paradigm (Sohl-Dickstein et al., 2015; Song & Ermon, 2019; Ho et al., 2020; Dhariwal & Ni… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. L2D LMs overview. Training-time sampling of diffu￾sion tokens x 1:k t (bottom) and architecture diagram for L2D (top). tecture, where the hidden representation of the diffusion token xt is propagated, affecting the frozen “main” LM path only at the final layer. In this section, we provide details about each specific L2D component, highlighting how our choices ensure scalability and efficiency advantages over prior d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Diffusion performance evolution. Performance with the progression of the timestep t within L2D’s diffusion process. the focus of our targeted training dataset, while optimiz￾ing a small fraction of the original weights (less than 6% for Llama 1B and 3.5% for Llama 8B). Although expect￾edly more limited, we still find some benefits in general knowledge tasks, indicating that the inductive bias from multi-step inferen… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Classifier-free guidance Performance on the math (left) and coding tasks (right) varying L2D’s guidance strength wg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CANDI: Hybrid Discrete-Continuous Diffusion Models

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CANDI combines masked and Gaussian corruption in one noising process, letting discrete diffusion models use continuous gradients for joint updates and guidance.

  2. A Survey on Latent Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes latent reasoning methods into vertical recurrence, horizontal recurrence, and infinite-depth diffusion, arguing that silent reasoning can beat explicit chain-of-thought.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., et al

    Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774,

    arXiv

  2. [3]

    Implementation hyper-parameters of the weight finetuning baselines and L2D. Hyper-parameter Weight finetuning L2D Flow hidden dimensionality ¯d – 256 Timestep embedding dimensionality – 256 Diffusion path conditioning hidden dimensionality – 256 Noise scaling ratio σ – 64 Optimizer AdamW AdamW Warmup steps 100 100 Maximum learning rate 1 × 10−5 1 × 10−4 F...

    work page

  3. [4]

    Overview of evaluation datasets for the considered tasks and their characteristics. Dataset (subset) Huggingface Repository Split Few-shot split Size InstructHumanEval codeparrot/instructhumaneval test test 159 MBPP (full) google-research-datasets/mbpp test prompt 499 GSM8K (main) openai/gsm8k test train 1,319 MATH lighteval/MATH test train 4,347 MMLU (al...

    work page 2022

  4. [5]

    Generative flows on discrete state-spaces: Enabling multimodal flows with applications to protein co-design

    Campbell, A., Yim, J., Barzilay, R., Rainforth, T., and Jaakkola, T. Generative flows on discrete state-spaces: Enabling multimodal flows with applications to protein co-design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04997,

    arXiv

  5. [6]

    Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y ., Joseph, N., Brockman, G., et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374,

    arXiv

  6. [9]

    Training verifiers to solve math word problems

    Cobbe, K., Kosaraju, V ., Bavarian, M., Chen, M., Jun, H., Kaiser, L., Plappert, M., Tworek, J., Hilton, J., Nakano, R., Hesse, C., and Schulman, J. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168,

    arXiv

  7. [11]

    H., Doucet, A., Strudel, R., Dyer, C., Durkan, C., et al

    Dieleman, S., Sartran, L., Roshannai, A., Savinov, N., Ganin, Y ., Richemond, P. H., Doucet, A., Strudel, R., Dyer, C., Durkan, C., et al. Continuous diffusion for categorical data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15089,

    arXiv

  8. [12]

    The llama 3 herd of models

    Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Yang, A., Fan, A., et al. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783,

    arXiv

Show all 57 references
  1. [14]

    Gat, I., Remez, T., Shaul, N., Kreuk, F., Chen, R

    URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=hQwb-lbM6EL. Gat, I., Remez, T., Shaul, N., Kreuk, F., Chen, R. T., Syn- naeve, G., Adi, Y ., and Lipman, Y . Discrete flow match- ing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15595,

    arXiv

  2. [15]

    Deepseek-r1: In- centivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning

    Guo, D., Yang, D., Zhang, H., Song, J., Zhang, R., Xu, R., Zhu, Q., Ma, S., Wang, P., Bi, X., et al. Deepseek-r1: In- centivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948,

    arXiv

  3. [17]

    David helps goliath: Inference-time collaboration be- tween small specialized and large general diffusion lms

    Han, X., Kumar, S., Tsvetkov, Y ., and Ghazvininejad, M. David helps goliath: Inference-time collaboration be- tween small specialized and large general diffusion lms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14771,

    arXiv

  4. [18]

    Diffu- sionbert: Improving generative masked language models with diffusion models

    He, Z., Sun, T., Wang, K., Huang, X., and Qiu, X. Diffu- sionbert: Improving generative masked language models with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15029,

    arXiv

  5. [20]

    J., Shen, Y ., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y ., Wang, S., Wang, L., and Chen, W

    Hu, E. J., Shen, Y ., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y ., Wang, S., Wang, L., and Chen, W. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685,

    arXiv

  6. [21]

    Hui, B., Yang, J., Cui, Z., Yang, J., Liu, D., Zhang, L., Liu, T., Zhang, J., Yu, B., Lu, K., et al. Qwen2. 5-coder technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12186,

    arXiv

  7. [22]

    Openai o1 system card

    Jaech, A., Kalai, A., Lerer, A., Richardson, A., El-Kishky, A., Low, A., Helyar, A., Madry, A., Beutel, A., Car- ney, A., et al. Openai o1 system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16720,

    arXiv

  8. [23]

    D., Singh, A., Baumli, K., Iqbal, S., Bishop, C., Roelofs, R., et al

    Kumar, A., Zhuang, V ., Agarwal, R., Su, Y ., Co-Reyes, J. D., Singh, A., Baumli, K., Iqbal, S., Bishop, C., Roelofs, R., et al. Training language models to self-correct via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12917,

    arXiv

  9. [24]

    Improving the training of rectified flows

    Lee, S., Lin, Z., and Fanti, G. Improving the training of rectified flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20320,

    arXiv

  10. [25]

    T., Lopez-Paz, D., Ben-Hamu, H., and Gat, I

    Lipman, Y ., Havasi, M., Holderrieth, P., Shaul, N., Le, M., Karrer, B., Chen, R. T., Lopez-Paz, D., Ben-Hamu, H., and Gat, I. Flow matching guide and code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06264,

    arXiv

  11. [26]

    Don’t throw away your value model! generating more preferable text with value- guided monte-carlo tree search decoding

    Liu, J., Cohen, A., Pasunuru, R., Choi, Y ., Hajishirzi, H., and Celikyilmaz, A. Don’t throw away your value model! generating more preferable text with value- guided monte-carlo tree search decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15028,

    arXiv

  12. [27]

    Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow

    Liu, X., Gong, C., and Liu, Q. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003,

    arXiv

  13. [28]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101,

    Loshchilov, I. Decoupled weight decay regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101,

    arXiv

  14. [29]

    Discrete diffusion model- ing by estimating the ratios of the data distribution

    Lou, A., Meng, C., and Ermon, S. Discrete diffusion model- ing by estimating the ratios of the data distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16834,

    arXiv

  15. [30]

    Lovelace, J., Kishore, V ., Chen, Y ., and Weinberger, K. Q. Diffusion guided language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04220,

    arXiv

  16. [31]

    K., Ivison, H., Tae, J., Henderson, J., Belt- agy, I., Peters, M

    Mahabadi, R. K., Ivison, H., Tae, J., Henderson, J., Belt- agy, I., Peters, M. E., and Cohan, A. Tess: Text-to- text self-conditioned simplex diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08379,

    arXiv

  17. [32]

    L., Fei-Fei, L., Hajishirzi, H., Zettlemoyer, L., Liang, P., Cand `es, E., and Hashimoto, T

    Muennighoff, N., Yang, Z., Shi, W., Li, X. L., Fei-Fei, L., Hajishirzi, H., Zettlemoyer, L., Liang, P., Cand `es, E., and Hashimoto, T. s1: Simple test-time scaling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.19393,

    arXiv

  18. [33]

    Step- by-step diffusion: An elementary tutorial

    Nakkiran, P., Bradley, A., Zhou, H., and Advani, M. Step- by-step diffusion: An elementary tutorial. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08929,

    arXiv

  19. [35]

    S., Arriola, M., Schiff, Y ., Gokaslan, A., Marro- quin, E., Chiu, J

    Sahoo, S. S., Arriola, M., Schiff, Y ., Gokaslan, A., Marro- quin, E., Chiu, J. T., Rush, A., and Kuleshov, V . Simple and effective masked diffusion language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07524,

    arXiv

  20. [37]

    Scaling llm test- time compute optimally can be more effective than scal- ing model parameters

    Snell, C., Lee, J., Xu, K., and Kumar, A. Scaling llm test- time compute optimally can be more effective than scal- ing model parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03314,

    arXiv

  21. [39]

    P., Kumar, A., Er- mon, S., and Poole, B

    Song, Y ., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Er- mon, S., and Poole, B. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020b. Strudel, R., Tallec, C., Altch´e, F., Du, Y ., Ganin, Y ., Men- sch, A., Grath...

    2011 arXiv

  22. [40]

    M., Hauth, A., et al

    Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Wu, Y ., Alayrac, J.-B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A. M., Hauth, A., et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805,

    arXiv

  23. [41]

    Inference-time alignment in diffu- sion models with reward-guided generation: Tutorial and review

    Uehara, M., Zhao, Y ., Wang, C., Li, X., Regev, A., Levine, S., and Biancalani, T. Inference-time alignment in diffu- sion models with reward-guided generation: Tutorial and review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09685,

    arXiv

  24. [42]

    Towards understanding chain-of-thought prompting: An empirical study of what matters

    Wang, B., Min, S., Deng, X., Shen, J., Wu, Y ., Zettlemoyer, L., and Sun, H. Towards understanding chain-of-thought prompting: An empirical study of what matters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10001,

    arXiv

  25. [43]

    Seqdif- fuseq: Text diffusion with encoder-decoder transformers

    Yuan, H., Yuan, Z., Tan, C., Huang, F., and Huang, S. Seqdif- fuseq: Text diffusion with encoder-decoder transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10325,

    arXiv

  26. [44]

    A reparameter- ized discrete diffusion model for text generation

    Zheng, L., Yuan, J., Yu, L., and Kong, L. A reparameter- ized discrete diffusion model for text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05737,

    arXiv

  27. [47]

    coding",

    library, which we use in our implementation to compute the diffusion path with L2D. B. Datasets B.1. Training Dataset Composition Our targeted training and validation data used for L2D and our baselines is a carefully extracted combination of different subsets of the recent la...

    2024

  28. [48]

    Similarly, pass@1, pass@5, and pass@10 are calculated by verifying model generations on unit tests

    and BigCode Evaluation Har- ness (Ben Allal et al., 2022), we include one unit test case in each prompt. Similarly, pass@1, pass@5, and pass@10 are calculated by verifying model generations on unit tests. GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K, Cobbe et al

    2022

  29. [50]

    Classifier-free guidance categories of the training and evaluation task datasets. Dataset Category Guidance Category SmolTalk metamathqa-50k math SmolTalk numina-cot-100k math SmolTalk openhermes-100k general knowledge SmolTalk self-oss-instruct/coding coding SmolTalk self-oss...

    2022

  30. [52]

    and MBPP (Austin et al., 2021b) coding benchmarks, together with performance on the PIQA (Bisk et al., 2020), ARC-Easy, and ARC-Challenge (Clark et al.,

    2020

  31. [53]

    best-of-N

    Performance and aggregated statistics for L2D evaluated with the ˆx estimate proposed by Dieleman et al. (2022) to compute the velocity. Method/Metric Mathematics Coding General knowledge Overall GSM8K MATH HumanEval MBPP MMLU MMLU-Pro Average Score Parameters Llama 3.2 1B Ins...

    2022

  32. [54]

    for the diffusion timestep t. Method/Metric Mathematics Coding General knowledge Overall GSM8K MATH HumanEval MBPP MMLU MMLU-Pro Average Score Parameters Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 13.86 10.00 45.26 50.00 38.46 13.63 28.54 - + L2D 38.86 17.18 47.80 51.80 41.99 15.35 35.50 73M + L2D...

    2024

  33. [55]

    <think>/<answer>

    Performance and aggregated statistics for L2D and our main ablations across all Llama and Qwen models for additional pass@k settings and tasks. Method/Task Coding extended results Additional tasks Overall HumanEval@5 HumanEval@1 MBPP@5 MBPP@1 ARC-Easy ARC-Challenge PIQA Parame...

    2022

  34. [56]

    As discussed in the main text, we find the effects of adaptive solvers and test-time advances like classifier-free guidance to be of remarkable importance, considerably beyond simply scaling the number of training parameters. We find these results quite analogous to similar fi...

    2022

  35. [57]

    task implementation, with a more permissive answer extraction, eight chain-of-thought prompts, and greedy sampling, matching the task implementation from Dubey et al. (2024). Method/Task Mathematics GSM8K GSM8K (greedy/relaxed) Parameters Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 13.86 39.24 - + ...

    2024

  36. [64]

    As suggested by Dieleman et al. (2022), we note that the optimal diffusion schedule might evolve throughout training, with recent diffusion advances like time-warping being immediate directions for potential future improvements of our framework. 15 Large Language Models to Dif...

    2022

  37. [128]

    Extended Results D.1

    41.06 18.45 44.03 46.83 42.09 16.06 34.75 73M D. Extended Results D.1. Inference ODE Solvers Our main experiments in Section 4 were collected with a second-order midpoint solver, an empirically robust choice in the traditional diffusion framework for different computational bu...

    2021

  38. [1969]

    M., Wen, Y ., Zhang, W., and Wang, J

    Feng, X., Wan, Z., Wen, M., McAleer, S. M., Wen, Y ., Zhang, W., and Wang, J. Alphazero-like tree-search can guide large language model decoding and training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17179,

    arXiv

  39. [2015]

    Denoising diffusion im- plicit models

    Song, J., Meng, C., and Ermon, S. Denoising diffusion im- plicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020a. Song, Y . and Ermon, S. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32,

    2010 arXiv

  40. [2016]

    Savinov, N., Chung, J., Binkowski, M., Elsen, E., and Oord, A. v. d. Step-unrolled denoising autoencoders for text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.06749,

    arXiv

  41. [2017]

    and Salimans, T

    Ho, J. and Salimans, T. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598,

    arXiv

  42. [2018]

    Chen, T., Zhang, R., and Hinton, G

    URL https:// github.com/rtqichen/torchdiffeq. Chen, T., Zhang, R., and Hinton, G. Analog bits: Gen- erating discrete data using diffusion models with self- conditioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04202,

    arXiv

  43. [2019]

    J., and Neubig, G

    11 Large Language Models to Diffusion Finetuning Reid, M., Hellendoorn, V . J., and Neubig, G. Diffuser: Discrete diffusion via edit-based reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.16886,

    arXiv

  44. [2020]

    Training diffusion models with reinforcement learning

    Black, K., Janner, M., Du, Y ., Kostrikov, I., and Levine, S. Training diffusion models with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13301,

    arXiv

  45. [2021]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional trans- formers for language understanding

    Devlin, J. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional trans- formers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805,

    arXiv

  46. [2022]

    Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge

    Clark, P., Cowhey, I., Etzioni, O., Khot, T., Sabharwal, A., Schoenick, C., and Tafjord, O. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge. arXiv:1803.05457v1,

    arXiv

  47. [2023]

    V ., R´e, C., and Mirhoseini, A

    Brown, B., Juravsky, J., Ehrlich, R., Clark, R., Le, Q. V ., R´e, C., and Mirhoseini, A. Large language monkeys: Scaling inference compute with repeated sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21787,

    arXiv

  48. [2024]

    and Li, Y

    Allen-Zhu, Z. and Li, Y . Physics of language models: Part 1, context-free grammar. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13673, 2023a. Allen-Zhu, Z. and Li, Y . Physics of language models: Part 3.1, knowledge storage and extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.14316, 2023b. Austin, J., Joh...

    arXiv

  49. [2025]

    Ssd-lm: Semi- autoregressive simplex-based diffusion language model for text generation and modular control

    Han, X., Kumar, S., and Tsvetkov, Y . Ssd-lm: Semi- autoregressive simplex-based diffusion language model for text generation and modular control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17432,

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.