Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Reentrant localization transition in a dimerized quasiperiodic dipolar chain

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a dimerized chain of dipolar emitters, increasing the quasiperiodic modulation strength drives part of the spectrum through extended, critical, localized, critical, and localized phases, and the reentrant critical phase survives the…

desk verdict Credible numerical evidence for a reentrant localization transition in an all-to-all dipolar chain, but the generality claim rests on one hand-picked quasiperiodic period. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16514 v2 pith:IATXWJJB submitted 2025-01-27 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.dis-nn

Thomas F. Allard , Guillaume Weick This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords reentrantlocalizationtransitionquasiperiodicdipolarchainall-to-allcouplingAubry-Andrémodelmultifractalanalysisdisorder-enhancedtransportopenquantumsystemdimerized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Reentrant localization transitions are the counterintuitive sequence in which a portion of an eigenspectrum localizes as quasiperiodic disorder increases, then becomes critical again, then localizes again. This paper asks whether such a transition can survive in a realistic chain of dipolar emitters in which every emitter interacts with every other through a 1/$r^{3}$ quasistatic Coulomb coupling, rather than only with nearest neighbors. It establishes that it does survive: for a dimerized chain with asymmetric quasiperiodic modulation of the intra- and interdimer spacings, eigenstates pass through extended, critical, localized, critical, and localized phases as the modulation strength grows. The reentrant critical window is shown to be genuine by finite-size scaling and multifractal analysis, and transport simulations show it appears as disorder-enhanced propagation in low-loss emitters. The result matters because it identifies a concrete, experimentally accessible platform where an anomalous localization transition is not killed by long-range interactions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimerized quasiperiodic dipolar chain, a tight-binding Hamiltonian with all-to-all coupling strength $\Omega_{s,s'}^{m,m'} = -2\omega_0 (a / r_{s,s'}^{m,m'})^3$, where the emitter spacings are quasiperiodically modulated as $d_{1,m} = d_1[1+\Delta_1 \cos(2\pi m\beta)]$ and $d_{2,m} = d_2[1+\Delta_2 \cos(2\pi m\beta)]$. The mechanism that produces the reentrant transition is the combination of a nonzero average dimerization $\epsilon = (d_1-d_2)/(d_1+d_2)$ and an asymmetric quasiperiodic strength ratio $\Gamma = \Delta_2/\Delta_1$: this asymmetry creates a cusp-shaped intermediate region in the $(\epsilon, \Delta_1)$ plane, and along a line of fixed $\epsilon$ the spectrum re-enters a critical phase near $\Delta_1 \approx 0.34$. The quantitative signatures are the inverse participation ratio, the normalized participation ratio, and the indicator $\eta = \log_{10}(\langle \mathrm{IPR}\rangle\langle \mathrm{NPR}\rangle)$, with multifractal exponents $\tau_q$ extracted from generalized IPRs confirming criticality.

What would settle it

Compute the averaged NPR at $\Delta_1 \approx 0.34$ for $\beta$ set to the golden ratio $(\sqrt{5}+1)/2$ while keeping $\epsilon = -0.24$ and $\Gamma = 1.75$; if a reentrant peak persists in the $N\to\infty$ limit, the period-dependence claim is wrong. Alternatively, in a driven chain with golden-ratio spacing modulation and $\gamma/\omega_0 = 10^{-5}$, the absence of a transport enhancement between $\Delta_1 = 0.29$ and $0.34$ would falsify the prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Hamiltonian (1), describing 2N longitudinally polarized dipolar emitters with quasistatic coupling $\Omega_{s,s'}^{m,m'} = -2\omega_0 (a / r_{s,s'}^{m,m'})^3$ and spacings $d_{1,m} = d_1[1+\Delta_1 \cos(2\pi m\beta)]$ and $d_{2,m} = d_2[1+\Delta_2 \cos(2\pi m\beta)]$, exhibits a reentrant localization transition at dimerization $\epsilon = -0.24$ and quasiperiodic strength ratio $\Gamma = 1.75$, with incommensurate period $\beta = (\sqrt{13}+3)/2 + (\sqrt{5}+1)/2$. As $\Delta_1$ increases, the spectrum passes from extended ($\Delta_1 \lesssim 0.04$) to a first critical phase ($0.04 \lesssim \Delta_1 \lesssim 0.25$), to a localized phase ($0.25 \lesssim \Delta_1 \lesssim 0.32$), then re-enters a second critical phase ($0.32 \lesssim \Delta_1 \lesssim 0.35$) before a final localized phase ($\Delta_1 \gtrsim 0.35$). The authors argue this demonstrates that reentrant localization transitions survive all-to-all $1/r^3$ couplings, and they connect the transition to an interplay between dimerization and the asymmetry of the quasiperiodic modulation, $\Gamma = \Delta_2/\Delta_1 \neq 1$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on a hand-picked irrational spacing period: with the usual golden-ratio period the reentrant transition disappears from the parameter region allowed by the dipolar approximation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reentrant localization transition survives the all-to-all quasistatic dipolar coupling, so the effect is not limited to nearest-neighbor models.
  • The reentrant critical phase at $\Delta_1 \approx 0.34$ is a genuine multifractal phase: the averaged NPR tends to a finite value as $N\to\infty$ and the generalized IPR shows nontrivial $q$-dependent scaling.
  • Approximately 10% of eigenstates, near the upper edge of the low-energy band, undergo the reentrant transition; the rest of the spectrum stays localized or extended depending on energy.
  • In driven-dissipative transport, the reentrant critical phase manifests as quasiperiodic disorder-enhanced transport: propagation at $\Delta_1 = 0.34$ is up to two orders of magnitude stronger than at $\Delta_1 = 0.29$, provided the damping rate is low ($\gamma/\omega_0 = 10^{-5}$).
  • The transition is fragile: at a higher damping rate ($\gamma/\omega_0 = 10^{-3}$), the reentrant enhancement is barely detectable, showing that losses are detrimental.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper finds no reentrant transition for the golden-ratio period, the reentrant window is likely a property of the specific irrational period rather than a generic consequence of all-to-all dipolar coupling; sweeping $\beta$ over other quadratic irrationals would map out how universal the effect is.
  • Since the reentrant eigenstates sit at the upper edge of the bright low-energy band for longitudinal dipoles, far-field emission measurements on a driven chain could detect the reentrant window without site-resolved imaging.
  • For transverse polarization the same physics shifts to the high-energy (again bright) band, so a two-polarization experiment would show whether the transition is carried by the bright band or by the band-edge geometry.
  • The disorder-enhanced transport found at $\gamma/\omega_0 = 10^{-5}$ suggests that in low-loss platforms such as microwave antenna arrays the reentrant effect could act as a tunable switch, where increasing the spacing modulation first suppresses and then partially restores propagation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a dimerized chain of dipolar emitters with all-to-all 1/r^3 quasistatic coupling and quasiperiodically modulated intra- and interdimer spacings. By exact numerical diagonalization of the bosonic Hamiltonian (1), the authors compute the averaged IPR, NPR, and the indicator η, and report a reentrant localization transition (RLT) for a particular set of parameters: β = (√13+3)/2 + (√5+1)/2, Γ = 1.75, ε = −0.24, with d1 + d2 = 15a. The RLT appears as an extended–critical–localized–critical–localized sequence as Δ1 increases. Finite-size scaling and a multifractal analysis of the generalized IPR are used to support the critical nature of the reentrant phase. The paper also simulates driven-dissipative transport with a Lindblad master equation and shows that low losses can expose disorder-enhanced transport associated with the reentrant phase.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides an explicit example of an RLT in a model with all-to-all power-law couplings, going beyond the nearest-neighbor models where RLTs are usually studied. The numerical evidence is credible in several respects: the phase diagram shows distinct regions, the finite-size scaling in Figs. 3 and 4 is consistent with a genuine intermediate phase, and the multifractal analysis in the Appendix indicates nontrivial τ_q at the reentrant point. The authors are also transparent about the fact that the golden-ratio choice for β does not produce an RLT in their parameter window. However, the central claim of robustness to all-to-all interactions is currently tied to one specially chosen incommensurate period, and the manuscript would benefit from either a systematic study of the β dependence or a more careful statement of the scope of the result. The transport simulations are suggestive but do not independently establish the RLT; they mainly illustrate how losses degrade the signal.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.B (paragraph after Eq. (10))] The paper explicitly states that with the usual golden-ratio value for β no RLT is found for Hamiltonian (1) in the parameter region allowed by the dipolar constraint (10), and therefore β is fixed to the sum of the bronze and golden ratios. Since all subsequent numerical evidence in Figs. 2–8 and the Appendix is obtained at this single β, the abstract and conclusion statements about the robustness of RLTs to all-to-all coupling are too broad. At minimum, the authors should either scan over a range of incommensurate periods or rational approximants to show how the RLT window depends on β, or restrict the claims to this specific quasiperiodic sequence. Without such a test, the result is a model-specific demonstration, not a demonstration of robustness.
  2. [II and III.B (constraint (10))] The choice d1 + d2 = 15a is fixed before scanning parameters, but the allowed region in Eq. (10) depends on d1 and d2. It is therefore possible that the absence of an RLT for the golden-ratio β is an artifact of this particular average spacing rather than an intrinsic property of the model. The authors should show whether changing d1 + d2 (or equivalently the allowed Δ1 range) can bring the RLT window into the allowed region for a standard β such as the golden ratio, or explicitly state that the reported effect is conditional on both the chosen β and the chosen average spacing.
  3. [Appendix, Eq. (13) and Fig. 8] The multifractal exponents τ_q are extracted by linear regression of ⟨IPR_q⟩ versus N, but the manuscript reports no error bars, no number of system sizes used, and no regression residuals. This matters because the reentrant critical phase occupies a narrow window (0.32 ≲ Δ1 ≲ 0.35) and the distinction between a finite positive τ_q for small q and τ_q = 0 for larger q is the main quantitative evidence for multifractality. Please provide uncertainty estimates for τ_q and specify the list of system sizes included in the fits.
minor comments (5)
  1. [I (Introduction)] There is a typo in the Introduction: “stength” should be “strength”.
  2. [II (Eq. (9))] The sentence defining η uses “η < −log10 N”; since the inequality is asymptotic, it may be clearer to write “η ≲ −log10 N” or to specify that this holds in the thermodynamic limit.
  3. [IV (Fig. 7 caption)] The caption states “a chain composed of 500 emitters” whereas the main text describes N = 250 dimers; this is consistent if each dimer has two emitters, but the caption should say “250 dimers (500 emitters)” to avoid confusion.
  4. [Appendix (Fig. 8)] The caption does not state which values of N are used in the linear regressions beyond “from N = 1000 to N = 10000”; listing the exact system sizes would improve reproducibility.
  5. [V (Conclusion)] The conclusion claims that the study demonstrates “the robustness of this phenomenon to all-to-all interactions”; please temper this statement to reflect that the demonstration is for a specific incommensurate period and parameter set, unless new β-scan data are added.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the reentrant localization transition is obtained by direct numerical diagonalization of the stated Hamiltonian, and the disclosed beta selection is a transparent parameter search, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a numerical phase-diagram result for the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1). The localization diagnostics (IPR, NPR, eta, and the generalized IPR) are computed directly from eigenvectors produced by exact diagonalization, and no parameter is fitted to the target conclusion. The only notable parameter choice is the incommensurate period beta. The text explicitly states that with the golden-ratio beta no RLT is found within the dipolar constraint (10), so beta is then fixed to the sum of the bronze and golden ratios following Ref. [53]. This is a transparent, pre-disclosed parameter search rather than a hidden fit: the RLT near Delta1 ~ 0.34 is then confirmed by finite-size scaling (Fig. 4) and by a multifractal analysis (Fig. 8). The self-citations (Refs. [68], [69], [75], [77]) are used only for the second-quantization scheme, the quasistatic-dipole justification, band-asymmetry interpretation, and prior disorder-enhanced-transport context; none of them supplies the existence of the RLT or the phase boundaries. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it is said to predict, and no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The overbroad generality statement about robustness to all-to-all interactions is a scope-of-claim concern, not a circularity, because the numerical evidence is self-contained for the parameters actually studied. Therefore the paper receives a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. The central result rests on three hand-chosen dimensionless parameters (beta, Gamma, epsilon), which are not fitted to data but selected to make the RLT appear in the numerically allowed regime. The physical modeling assumptions (quasistatic dipoles, Markovian dissipation, dipolar constraint) are standard for the platform.

free parameters (3)
  • Incommensurate period beta = (sqrt(13)+3)/2 + (sqrt(5)+1)/2
    Chosen by hand because the golden ratio yields no RLT in the allowed parameter region; the paper states this explicitly in Sec. IIIB. The entire RLT demonstration depends on this value.
  • Quasiperiodic strength ratio Gamma = Delta2/Delta1 = 1.75
    Selected from the phase diagram in Fig. 2; Gamma=1 gives no RLT, while Gamma=1.75 produces the cusp-like intermediate phase used for the central claim.
  • Average dimerization epsilon = -0.24
    Chosen at the cusp of the intermediate phase in Fig. 2(b); the paper fixes this value for the detailed RLT analysis and transport simulations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Quasistatic dipole-dipole coupling with rotating wave approximation captures the physics; retardation is neglected.
    Sec. II: longitudinally polarized dipoles are chosen to minimize retardation effects, so only the quasistatic Coulomb part is retained.
  • domain assumption Dipolar approximation is valid only for inter-emitter distances >= 3a, enforced by the constraint in Eq. (10).
    Sec. IIIB: the parameter space is restricted by requiring d1m, d2m >= 3a to avoid multipole corrections.
  • domain assumption Dissipation is described by a Lindblad master equation with a Markovian bath at rate gamma.
    Sec. IV, Eq. (12): the open quantum system simulation assumes Markovian, phenomenological Ohmic or radiative losses.
  • standard math IPR, NPR, and multifractal scaling diagnostics correctly identify localized, extended, and critical phases.
    Sec. IIIA and Appendix: these are standard eigenvector localization diagnostics used without modification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reentrant localization transition in a dimerized quasiperiodic dipolar chain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IATXWJJB

@misc{pith2026250116514,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reentrant localization transition in a dimerized quasiperiodic dipolar chain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IATXWJJB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16514}
}
read the original abstract

Reentrant localization transitions, that is, the transitions of a portion of the eigenspectrum from localized to critical and then again to localized as the quasiperiodic modulation strength is increased, have been recently unveiled in various quasiperiodic models. However, both the physical mechanisms underlying these transitions and how they may extend to systems with long-range coupling and dissipation remain elusive. Here we investigate the fate of such a phenomenon in a dimerized quasiperiodic chain of lossy dipolar emitters with all-to-all coupling. We demonstrate that in this model, reentrant transitions survive to all-to-all couplings and occur from an interplay between the chain dimerization and an asymmetric quasiperiodic modulation of the emitter spacings. Transport simulations through a driven-dissipative open quantum system approach complete our study and reveal the detrimental effects of emitter losses on the reentrant localization transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16514 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of the dimerized quasiperiodic dipolar chain under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Localization phase diagrams of the model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. NPR [see Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Eigenspectrum as a function of the quasiperiodic strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Steady-state amplitude of the dipole moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Scaling of the generalized IPR [see Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr ´e, Analyticity breaking and Anderson lo- calization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc. 3, 133 (1980)

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    P. G. Harper, Single band motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Proc. Phys. Soc. A 68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  3. [3]

    G. A. Dom ´ınguez-Castro and R. Paredes, The Aubry-Andr ´e model as a hobbyhorse for understanding the localization phe- nomenon, Eur. J. Phys. 40, 045403 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    S. Y . Jitomirskaya, Metal-insulator transition for the almost Mathieu operator, Ann. Math. 150, 1159 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Avila and S

    A. Avila and S. Jitomirskaya, The ten Martini problem, Ann. Math. 170, 303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    and photonic lattices of evanescently coupled waveguides with quasiperiodically modulated widths [7]. Many extensions of the AA model with specific forms of onsite energy modulation [8, 9], quasiperiodically mod- ulated couplings [10–13] (also termed off-diagonal modula- tion), dimerized chains with the latter modulation [14–21], or also with richer physi...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zac- canti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose-Einstein condensate, Na- ture 453, 895 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Lahini, R

    Y . Lahini, R. Pugatch, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Morandotti, N. Davidson, and Y . Silberberg, Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 013901 (2009)

    2009

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    D. R. Grempel, S. Fishman, and R. E. Prange, Localization in an incommensurate potential: An exactly solvable model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 833 (1982)

    1982

  2. [10]

    Ganeshan, J

    S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, Nearest neighbor 9 tight binding models with an exact mobility edge in one dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 146601 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    J. H. Han, D. J. Thouless, H. Hiramoto, and M. Kohmoto, Crit- ical and bicritical properties of Harper’s equation with next- nearest-neighbor coupling, Phys. Rev. B 50, 11365 (1994)

    1994

  4. [12]

    Chang, K

    I. Chang, K. Ikezawa, and M. Kohmoto, Multifractal properties of the wave functions of the square-lattice tight-binding model with next-nearest-neighbor hopping in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 55, 12971 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    Y . E. Kraus, Y . Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, and O. Zilber- berg, Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106402 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Li, Y .-Y

    H. Li, Y .-Y . Wang, Y .-H. Shi, K. Huang, X. Song, G.-H. Liang, Z.-Y . Mei, B. Zhou, H. Zhang, J.-C. Zhang, S. Chen, S. P. Zhao, Y . Tian, Z.-Y . Yang, Z. Xiang, K. Xu, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of critical phase transition in a generalized Aubry- Andr´e-Harper model ...

    2023

  7. [15]

    F. Liu, S. Ghosh, and Y . D. Chong, Localization and adiabatic pumping in a generalized Aubry-Andr ´e-Harper model, Phys. Rev. B 91, 014108 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    J. C. C. Cestari, A. Foerster, and M. A. Gusm ˜ao, Fate of topological states in incommensurate generalized Aubry-Andr´e models, Phys. Rev. B 93, 205441 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Liu and H

    T. Liu and H. Guo, Topological phase transition in the quasiperiodic disordered Su-Schriffer-Heeger chain, Phys. Lett. A 382, 3287 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Longhi, Topological Anderson phase in quasi-periodic waveguide lattices, Opt

    S. Longhi, Topological Anderson phase in quasi-periodic waveguide lattices, Opt. Lett. 45, 4036 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    T. Xiao, D. Xie, Z. Dong, T. Chen, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Obser- vation of topological phase with critical localization in a quasi- periodic lattice, Sci. Bull. 66, 2175 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    T. Liu, X. Xia, S. Longhi, and L. Sanchez-Palencia, Anoma- lous mobility edges in one-dimensional quasiperiodic models, SciPost Phys. 12, 027 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    T. V . C. Ant˜ao, D. A. Miranda, and N. M. R. Peres, Coexistence of one-dimensional and two-dimensional topology and genesis of Dirac cones in the chiral Aubry-Andr ´e model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195436 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    T. Liu, P. Wang, and G. Xianlong, Phase diagram of the off- diagonal Aubry-Andr´e model, arXiv:1609.06939

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    S. Iyer, V . Oganesyan, G. Refael, and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization in a quasiperiodic system, Phys. Rev. B87, 134202 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    X. Deng, S. Ray, S. Sinha, G. V . Shlyapnikov, and L. Santos, One-dimensional quasicrystals with power-law hopping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 025301 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    G. A. Dom ´ınguez-Castro and R. Paredes, Localization of pairs in one-dimensional quasicrystals with power-law hopping, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134208 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Liu, J.-M

    G.-J. Liu, J.-M. Zhang, S.-Z. Li, and Z. Li, Emergent strength- dependent scale-free mobility edge in a nonreciprocal long- range Aubry-Andr ´e-Harper model, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012222 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Jazaeri and I

    A. Jazaeri and I. I. Satija, Localization transition in incommen- surate non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. E63, 036222 (2001)

    2001

  20. [28]

    Yuce, PT symmetric Aubry-Andr´e model, Phys

    C. Yuce, PT symmetric Aubry-Andr´e model, Phys. Lett. A 378, 2024 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Jiang, L.-J

    H. Jiang, L.-J. Lang, C. Yang, S.-L. Zhu, and S. Chen, Inter- play of non-Hermitian skin effects and Anderson localization in nonreciprocal quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054301 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-Hermitian qua- sicrystals, Phys

    S. Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-Hermitian qua- sicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 237601 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    B. X. Wang and C. Y . Zhao, Topological quantum optical states in quasiperiodic cold atomic chains, Phys. Rev. A 103, 013727 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Y . Hu, K. Yan, and X. Chen, Emergent mobility edges and in- termediate phases in one-dimensional quasiperiodic plasmonic chains, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013322 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    D. S. Citrin, Surface plasmon polaritons in a class of quasiperi- odic nanoparticle Gauss chains, Plasmonics 10.1007/s11468- 024-02389-z (2024)

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Ramakumar, A

    R. Ramakumar, A. Das, and S. Sil, Lattice bosons in a quasi- disordered environment: The effects of a superlattice potential on single particle and many particle properties, Physica A 436, 814 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Goblot, A

    V . Goblot, A. ˇStrkalj, N. Pernet, J. L. Lado, C. Dorow, A. Lemaˆıtre, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, I. Sagnes, S. Ravets, A. Amo, J. Bloch, and O. Zilberberg, Emergence of criticality through a cascade of delocalization transitions in quasiperiodic chains, Nat. Phys. 16, 832 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    S. Roy, T. Mishra, B. Tanatar, and S. Basu, Reentrant localiza- tion transition in a quasiperiodic chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 106803 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Jiang, Y

    X.-P. Jiang, Y . Qiao, and J.-P. Cao, Mobility edges and reen- trant localization in one-dimensional dimerized non-Hermitian quasiperiodic lattice, Chin. Phys. B 30, 097202 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    C. Wu, J. Fan, G. Chen, and S. Jia, Non-Hermiticity-induced reentrant localization in a quasiperiodic lattice, New J. Phys. 23, 123048 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Han and L

    W. Han and L. Zhou, Dimerization-induced mobility edges and multiple reentrant localization transitions in non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054204 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Padhan, M

    A. Padhan, M. K. Giri, S. Mondal, and T. Mishra, Emergence of multiple localization transitions in a one-dimensional quasiperi- odic lattice, Phys. Rev. B 105, L220201 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    S. Roy, S. Chattopadhyay, T. Mishra, and S. Basu, Critical anal- ysis of the reentrant localization transition in a one-dimensional dimerized quasiperiodic lattice, Phys. Rev. B 105, 214203 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    H. Wang, X. Zheng, J. Chen, L. Xiao, S. Jia, and L. Zhang, Fate of the reentrant localization phenomenon in the one- dimensional dimerized quasiperiodic chain with long-range hopping, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075128 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    R. Qi, J. Cao, and X.-P. Jiang, Multiple localization transitions and novel quantum phases induced by a staggered on-site po- tential, Phys. Rev. B 107, 224201 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    E. Guan, G. Wang, X.-W. Guan, and X. Cai, Reentrant localiza- tion and mobility edges in a spinful Aubry-Andr´e-Harper model with a non-Abelian potential, Phys. Rev. A108, 033305 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Q. Dai, Z. Lu, and Z. Xu, Emergence of multifractality through cascadelike transitions in a mosaic interpolating Aubry-Andr´e- Fibonacci chain, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144207 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Gonc ¸alves, B

    M. Gonc ¸alves, B. Amorim, E. V . Castro, and P. Ribeiro, Renor- malization group theory of one-dimensional quasiperiodic lat- tice models with commensurate approximants, Phys. Rev. B 108, L100201 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Shimasaki, M

    T. Shimasaki, M. Prichard, H. E. Kondakci, a. E. Pagett, Y . Bai, P. Dotti, A. Cao, A. R. Dardia, T.-C. Lu, T. Grover, and D. M. Weld, Anomalous localization in a kicked quasicrystal, Nat. Phys. 20, 409 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Padhan, S

    A. Padhan, S. R. Padhi, and T. Mishra, Complete delocaliza- tion and reentrant topological transition in a non-Hermitian quasiperiodic lattice, Phys. Rev. B 109, L020203 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Ganguly, S

    S. Ganguly, S. Sarkar, K. Mondal, and S. K. Maiti, Phenomenon of multiple reentrant localization in a double-stranded helix with transverse electric field, Sci. Rep. 14, 3059 (2024). 10

    2024

  42. [50]

    Guo, Multiple intermediate phases in the interpolating Aubry-Andr´e-Fibonacci model, Phys

    C. Guo, Multiple intermediate phases in the interpolating Aubry-Andr´e-Fibonacci model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174203 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    D. A. Miranda, T. V . C. Ant˜ao, and N. M. R. Peres, Mechanical Su-Schrieffer-Heeger quasicrystal: Topology, localization, and mobility edge, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195427 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Tabanelli, C

    H. Tabanelli, C. Castelnovo, and A. ˇStrkalj, Reentrant local- ization transitions and anomalous spectral properties in off- diagonal quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 184208 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Z. Lu, Y . Zhang, and Z. Xu, Reentrant localization transitions in a topological Anderson insulator: A study of a generalized Su– Schrieffer–Heeger quasicrystal, Front. Phys. 20, 24204 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    P. S. Nair, D. Joy, and S. Sanyal, Emergent scale and anomalous dynamics in certain quasi-periodic systems, arXiv:2302.14053

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Li and Z

    S.-Z. Li and Z. Li, Emergent recurrent extension phase transi- tion in a quasiperiodic chain, arXiv:2304.11811

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Li and Z

    S.-Z. Li and Z. Li, The multiple re-entrant localization in a phase-shift quasiperiodic chain, arXiv:2305.12321

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Chang, Q.-B

    P.-J. Chang, Q.-B. Zeng, J. Pi, D. Ruan, and G.-L. Long, Investigation of reentrant localization transition in one- dimensional quasi-periodic lattice with long-range hopping, arXiv:2412.13518

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Vaidya, C

    S. Vaidya, C. J ¨org, K. Linn, M. Goh, and M. C. Rechtsman, Reentrant delocalization transition in one-dimensional photonic quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033170 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    X. Li, H. Xu, J. Wang, L.-Z. Tang, D.-W. Zhang, C. Yang, T. Su, C. Wang, Z. Mi, W. Sun, X. Liang, M. Chen, C. Li, Y . Zhang, K. Linghu, J. Han, W. Liu, Y . Feng, P. Liu, G. Xue, J. Zhang, Y . Jin, S.-L. Zhu, H. Yu, S. P. Zhao, and Q.-K. Xue, Mapping the topology-localization p...

    2024

  53. [61]

    Zuo and D

    Z.-W. Zuo and D. Kang, Reentrant localization transition in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with random-dimer disorder, Phys. Rev. A 106, 013305 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Z.-S. Xu, J. Gao, A. Iovan, I. M. Khaymovich, V . Zwiller, and A. W. Elshaari, Observation of reentrant metal-insulator transi- tion in a random-dimer disordered ssh lattice, npj Nanophoton. 1, 8 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    C. R. Mann, T. J. Sturges, G. Weick, W. L. Barnes, and E. Mar- iani, Manipulating type-I and type-II Dirac polaritons in cavity- embedded honeycomb metasurfaces, Nat. Commun. 9, 2194 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Pirmoradian, B

    F. Pirmoradian, B. Zare Rameshti, M. Miri, and S. Saeidian, Topological magnon modes in a chain of magnetic spheres, Phys. Rev. B 98, 224409 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    N. S. Mueller, Y . Okamura, B. G. M. Vieira, S. Juergensen, H. Lange, E. B. Barros, F. Schulz, and S. Reich, Deep strong light-matter coupling in plasmonic nanoparticle crystals, Nature 583, 780 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    A. P. Slobozhanyuk, A. N. Poddubny, A. E. Miroshnichenko, P. A. Belov, and Y . S. Kivshar, Subwavelength topological edge states in optically resonant dielectric structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 123901 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    B. X. Wang and C. Y . Zhao, Topological phonon polaritons in one-dimensional non-Hermitian silicon carbide nanoparticle chains, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165435 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Browaeys, D

    A. Browaeys, D. Barredo, and T. Lahaye, Experimental inves- tigations of dipole-dipole interactions between a few Rydberg atoms, J. Phys. B 49, 152001 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    C. A. Downing and G. Weick, Topological collective plasmons in bipartite chains of metallic nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B 95, 125426 (2017)

    2017

  62. [70]

    T. F. Allard and G. Weick, Quantum theory of plasmon polari- tons in chains of metallic nanoparticles: From near- to far-field coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B 104, 125434 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, P. Massignan, T. L. Hughes, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological Anderson insulator in disordered atomic wires, Science 362, 929 (2018)

    2018

  64. [72]

    M. Ren, Y . Yu, B. Wu, X. Qi, Y . Wang, X. Yao, J. Ren, Z. Guo, H. Jiang, H. Chen, X.-J. Liu, Z. Chen, and Y . Sun, Realization of gapped and ungapped photonic topological Anderson insula- tors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 066602 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Ganeshan, K

    S. Ganeshan, K. Sun, and S. Das Sarma, Topological zero- energy modes in gapless commensurate Aubry-Andr ´e-Harper models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 180403 (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    Li and S

    X. Li and S. Das Sarma, Mobility edge and intermediate phase in one-dimensional incommensurate lattice potentials, Phys. Rev. B 101, 064203 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    S. Y . Park and D. Stroud, Surface-plasmon dispersion relations in chains of metallic nanoparticles: An exact quasistatic calcu- lation, Phys. Rev. B 69, 125418 (2004)

    2004

  68. [76]

    C. A. Downing and G. Weick, Topological plasmons in dimer- ized chains of nanoparticles: Robustness against long-range quasistatic interactions and retardation effects, Eur. Phys. J. B 91, 253 (2018)

    2018

  69. [77]

    N. C. Ch ´avez, F. Mattiotti, J. A. M ´endez-Berm´udez, F. Bor- gonovi, and G. L. Celardo, Disorder-enhanced and disorder- independent transport with long-range hopping: Application to molecular chains in optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 153201 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    T. F. Allard and G. Weick, Disorder-enhanced transport in a chain of lossy dipoles strongly coupled to cavity photons, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245424 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.