Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 42 references

Improved quasi-invariance result for the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equation

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the Gaussian measure class is preserved by the periodic BO-BBM flow for every Sobolev regularity s > 1/2, matching the equation's global well-posedness range.

desk verdict The paper makes a real threshold improvement in quasi-invariance for BO-BBM, but Proposition 3.5 contains a concrete exponent mismatch that must be fixed before the proof is complete. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.17180 v1 pith:SNNN3YKG submitted 2025-01-24 math.AP math.PR

Justin Forlano This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.PR MSC 35Q5376B15
keywords Benjamin-Ono-BBMequationquasi-invarianceGaussianmeasuresSobolevregularitycriticaldispersionexponentialintegrabilityvariationalformulatrilinearsymbol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the flow of the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equation transports each Gaussian measure $\mu_s$ on mean-zero Sobolev functions to an equivalent measure for every regularity $s>1/2$, the same range where the equation is known to be globally well-posed. This matters because earlier quasi-invariance results required $s>1$, leaving a whole low-regularity regime open despite the existence of a global flow. The paper also proves a quantitative version: after inserting a conserved-energy cut-off, the transported density lies in $L^p$ for some $p=p(|t|,R)>1$ that tends to $1$ as $|t|\to\infty$, with bounds uniform in the frequency truncation. The main technical burden is the critical dispersion, which the paper handles by combining a variational formula for exponential moments with an iteration of short-time density bounds.

What carries the argument

The central object is the trilinear operator $Q_{s,N}(u)$, defined through the symmetrized decomposition (3.5)--(3.8), which measures the infinitesimal change of the Gaussian Sobolev norm under the truncated flow. Its symbol $\Psi_s(n_1,n_2,n_3)$ is controlled by Lemma 3.1, which places the derivative on the lowest-frequency factor and gives the needed gain. The exponential-integrability lemma (Lemma 3.3) is proved by a variational representation for exponential functionals, bounding $\lambda|Q_{s,N}(Y_N+V_N)|$ against $\frac12\|V_N\|^2_{H^{s+1/2}}$ via dyadic decompositions and random-oscillation estimates. Short-time $L^p$ bounds on the transported density follow (Lemma 3.4), and a recursive exponent-iteration argument (Proposition 3.5) extends them to arbitrarily long times.

What would settle it

Fix a regularity $\frac12<s\le 1$ and a small time $t$, and compute the second-moment quantity $QI_{s,N}(t)$ for increasing truncation $N$. If it grows like any positive power of $N$ (or even like $(\log N)^2$) for some $s>\frac12$, the uniform exponential-integrability bound of Lemma 3.3 is false and Theorem 1.1 collapses; the paper's own calculation shows this divergence only for $0<s\le\frac12$. Alternatively, check numerically whether the limit in (3.22) holds for an initial datum on the Gaussian support; a nonzero limiting error in $H^{\sigma'}$ would break the identification of $f_{t,R}$ as the Radon-Nikodym derivative.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 establishes that for every $s>\frac12$ and every $t\in\mathbb{R}$, the pushforward of the Gaussian measure $\mu_s$ by the BO-BBM flow is mutually absolutely continuous with respect to $\mu_s$. Moreover, for each $t>0$ and $R>0$ there is an integrability exponent $p=p(|t|,R)>1$, decaying to $1$ as $|t|\to\infty$, such that the Radon-Nikodym derivative $f_{t,R}$ of the localized transported measure lies in $L^p(d\mu_{s,R})$ with a bound uniform in the frequency truncation. The proof reaches this by writing the log-density as an integral of a trilinear operator $Q_{s,N}$, symmetrizing that operator so the derivative falls on the lowest frequency, proving a uniform exponential-integrability bound for $Q_{s,N}$ against a cut-off ball, and then iterating short-time $L^p$ estimates to arbitrary times. A separate calculation gives a lower bound on a variance criterion that grows like $N^{1-2s}$ for $0<s<\frac12$ and like $(\log N)^2$ at $s=\frac12$, which the paper reads as evidence that quasi-invariance should fail for $0<s\le\frac12$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the finite-dimensional truncated flows converge to the full flow uniformly on the Gaussian-measure support, exactly as asserted in (3.22); the paper cites global well-posedness and calls this standard, but gives neither a proof nor a reference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quasi-invariance now holds on the same Sobolev regularity range where the equation is known to be globally well-posed, so the gap between the dynamics and the measure-transport theory is closed.
  • For any fixed time and energy cut-off, the localized transported density has some $L^p$ integrability uniformly in the frequency truncation, making the transported measure a well-defined $L^p$ object rather than merely absolutely continuous.
  • The integrability exponent must tend to $1$ as $|t|\to\infty$, a loss attributed to critical dispersion; this predicts that no uniform-in-time higher integrability should be expected for this model.
  • For $s\le\frac12$, the variance criterion $QI_{s,N}(t)$ diverges polynomially (or logarithmically at $s=\frac12$), giving concrete evidence for the paper's conjecture that the transported measure becomes singular in that range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension would be to compute $QI_{s,N}(t)$ for $s$ just above $\frac12$; if it grows even logarithmically for some $s>\frac12$, the uniform exponential-integrability bound would need an extra cancellation, suggesting the true threshold is lower than the well-posedness range.
  • The same two-step recipe—symmetrized trilinear symbol, variational exponential moments, and iteration of short-time bounds—could be tested on other equations with borderline dispersion, such as fractional BBM at the critical exponent, to see whether the same $p(|t|,R)\to1$ pattern appears.
  • Removing the energy cut-off would require identifying the density without localization; a first testable step would be to check whether $f_{t,R}$ converges as $R\to\infty$ on bounded sets of the Gaussian support, which the paper leaves open.
  • The paper's divergence computation for $s\le\frac12$ suggests a possible numerical experiment: simulate the finite-dimensional truncated densities $f_t^N$ for small $s$ and observe whether their $L^p$ norms grow with $N$, which would corroborate the expected singularity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equation and proves that the Gaussian measures μ_s, for every s > 1/2, are quasi-invariant under the flow. Theorem 1.1 states that the transported measure (Φ_t)_#μ_s is mutually absolutely continuous with respect to μ_s, and moreover the Radon-Nikodym derivative f_{t,R} satisfies a localised L^p bound with p = p(|t|,R) > 1 tending to 1 as |t| → ∞. The proof combines the variational formula for exponential integrability with a dyadic decomposition of the relevant trilinear operator and a long-time iteration argument adapted from Forlano–Tolomeo. The paper also proves a complementary lower bound (Proposition 1.2) showing that a natural 'quasi-invariance benchmark' quantity diverges for 0 < s ≤ 1/2, which supports the conjecture that quasi-invariance fails there.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a substantial improvement over the earlier quasi-invariance result of Genovese–Luca–Tzvetkov, which required s > 1. The paper reaches the full range s > 1/2 in which periodic BO-BBM is globally well-posed, and it does so in the critical-dispersion regime where the integrability exponent must necessarily deteriorate in time. The quantitative nature of the density bound (1.11) and the accompanying negative result in Proposition 1.2 are valuable additions. The paper is generally careful, with detailed dyadic estimates and explicit use of the Gaussian structure, and it builds on recent techniques from Coe–Tolomeo and Forlano–Tolomeo, giving clear credit to those works.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3, Proposition 3.5, Eq. (3.14)] The proof sets q(0)τ_R = c0/R with q(0) = r1(p-1)/(p-r1). The recursive inequality (3.16) requires a uniform bound on ‖f^N_τ 1_BR‖_{L^p} for p > q(0). Lemma 3.4, however, only supplies an L^p bound under the condition p τ_R ≤ c0/R. Since (3.14) implies p τ_R = p c0/(q(0)R) > c0/R, Lemma 3.4 cannot be invoked at the point where (3.18) is obtained. The final exponential bound in Proposition 3.5, namely exp(∼C(R)(R(p-1)t/c0 + 1)), matches the choice p τ_R = c0/R, indicating that (3.14) is a typo. The author should replace (3.14) by p τ_R = c0/R and then verify the subsequent estimates, in particular (3.20) and the treatment of general t, under this corrected scaling.
  2. [§3, Proof of Theorem 1.1, Eq. (3.22)] The limit lim_{N→∞} ‖Φ_t(u0) − Φ^N_t(Π_{≤N}u0)‖_{C([-T,T];H^{σ'})} = 0 is asserted to follow from global well-posedness and 'a standard argument', but no proof or reference is supplied. This convergence is essential for the dominated-convergence steps (3.24) and (3.25) that identify the limiting object f_{t,R} as the Radon-Nikodym derivative. The author should provide a proof, for instance by combining the continuity of the solution map for (1.1) with the fact that Φ^N_t(Π_{≤N}u0) solves the projected equation (3.1), or give a precise reference for this approximation statement.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Case 4] In the paragraph for Case 4, the displayed estimate has inconsistent notation: the left-hand side is written as Q^{(1)}_{s,N}(Y_{N_1}, V_{N_2}, Y_{N_3}) while the right-hand side uses \v_{N_1}, \Y_{N_2}, \v_{N_3}. The intended case is (Y_{N_1}, V_{N_2}, V_{N_3}); the notation should be corrected to avoid confusion.
  2. [§3, Lemma 3.4 proof] In the chain of estimates for the L^p norm of f^N_t 1_{B_R}, the displayed identity involving the subtraction 'μ_{s,N}(B_R)' after the exponential integral is not an identity. The middle step with the subtraction should be removed or replaced by an inequality; the final bound is unaffected.
  3. [§1] The statement that the global well-posedness at σ = 1/2 from [22] 'extends without additional complication to the periodic setting' would benefit from a brief explanation, since the entire paper works on the torus and this is the only place where the real-line result is invoked.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the transported-density L^p bounds are re-derived from explicit truncation-flow estimates; cited prior works are tools, not conclusions.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 1.1) is a genuinely new quantitative bound on the Radon–Nikodym derivative f_{t,R}, obtained through a chain of explicit estimates: Lemma 3.3 proves exponential integrability of the generator Q_{s,N}, Lemma 3.4 converts it to short-time L^p bounds, Proposition 3.5 iterates those bounds to arbitrary times, and the proof of Theorem 1.1 passes to the full flow via (3.22). None of these steps assumes the conclusion: the densities f_t^N are defined by Liouville's theorem and the explicit formula (3.2), and the L^p norms are bounded rather than fitted. The variational formula cited from [15] and the iteration strategy cited from [16] are tools whose assumptions do not include quasi-invariance or the target bound, and the model-specific estimates for Q_{s,N} are reproved in Sections 4.1–4.2. There is no fitted-input-called-prediction step, no renaming of a known result as a new one, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work to force the choice of method. The unproved convergence assertion (3.22) and the reviewer's algebraic concern about the displayed choice of τ_R in (3.14) are real correctness/completeness issues, but they are not circularity: fixing them would not make the theorem an input to its own proof. The paper relies on the author's earlier work, but not in a way that reduces the central claim to a self-citation. Overall, no significant circularity; the appropriate score is low, reflecting only the presence of self-citations as methodological inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard tools (variational formula, Isserlis theorem, Sobolev calculus) and on the already established global well-posedness of BO-BBM. The most fragile input is the asserted convergence (3.22), which is load-bearing for the passage to the infinite-dimensional flow but not proven in detail.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Global well-posedness of BO-BBM on H^sigma(T) for sigma > 1/2, with the endpoint sigma = 1/2 via the periodic extension of [22].
    Invoked in the introduction and in the proof of Theorem 1.1 to define the flow on the support of mu_s for s > 1/2. The endpoint statement is an unproved periodic extension in this paper.
  • domain assumption Convergence of truncated flows (3.22) to the full flow in H^{sigma'} for every sigma' < sigma.
    Assumed to follow from 'a standard argument' and used to pass from finite-dimensional densities f^N_t to the limiting density f_{t,R}. Not proven in the text.
  • standard math Boue-Dupuis / Ustunel variational formula (simplified form in [15, Lemma 2.6]) for exponential moments of functionals of Gaussian measures.
    Used in (4.1) to bound the exponential integrability of Q_{s,N}; cited from the author's own prior work [15].
  • standard math Isserlis' theorem (Wick's formula) for moments of complex Gaussians.
    Used throughout Section 4 to compute expectations of products of random Fourier coefficients.
  • domain assumption Conservation of the energy E(u) and invariance of the ball B_R under the flow.
    Used in Lemma 3.4 and the proof of Theorem 1.1; the conservation law comes from the equation's structure (see [25]).
  • standard math Sobolev embedding and fractional Leibniz rule estimates.
    Used repeatedly in Section 4, e.g., H^{1/2}(T) embeds in L^4(T).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Improved quasi-invariance result for the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SNNN3YKG

@misc{pith2026250117180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Improved quasi-invariance result for the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SNNN3YKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.17180}
}
read the original abstract

We extend recent results of Genovese-Luca-Tzvetkov (2022) regarding the quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures under the flow of the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM (BO-BBM) equation to the full range where BO-BBM is globally well-posed. The main difficulty is due to the critical nature of the dispersion which we overcome by combining the approach of Coe-Tolomeo (2024) with an iteration argument due to Forlano-Tolomeo (2024) to obtain long-time higher integrability bounds on the transported density.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Albert, J

    J. Albert, J. Bona, Comparisons between model equations for long waves , J. Nonlinear Sci. 1 (1991) 345–374

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    Angulo, M

    J. Angulo, M. Scialom, C. Banquet, The regularized Benjamin–Ono and BBM equations: Well-pose dness and nonlinear stability , J. Differential Equations 250 (2011) 4011–4036

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Barashkov, M

    N. Barashkov, M. Gubinelli, A variational method for Φ 4 3, Duke Math. J. 169 (2020), no. 17, 3339–3415

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Benjamin, Internal waves of permanent form in fluids of great depth , J

    T. Benjamin, Internal waves of permanent form in fluids of great depth , J. Fluid Mech. 29 (1967) 559–592

    work page 1967

  5. [5]

    Benjamin, J

    T. Benjamin, J. Bona, J. Mahony, Models equations for long waves in nonlinear dispersive sys tems, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 272 (1972) 47–78

    work page 1972

  6. [6]

    J.L. Bona, H. Kalisch, Models for internal waves in deep water , Discrete Cont. Dyn. Systems 6 (2000) 1–20

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Bou´ e, P

    M. Bou´ e, P. Dupuis, A variational representation for certain functionals of Br ownian motion , Ann. Probab. 26 (1998), no. 4, 1641–1659

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation , Comm

    J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation , Comm. Math. Phys. 176(2): 421-445 (1996)

    work page 1996

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    N. Burq, L. Thomann, Almost sure scattering for the one dimensional nonlinear Sc hr¨ odinger equation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 296(2024), no.1480, vii+87 pp

    2024

  2. [10]

    N. Burq, N. Tzvetkov, Random data Cauchy theory for supercritical wave equations . II. A global existence result, Invent. Math. 173 (2008), no. 3, 477–496

    2008

  3. [11]

    J. Coe, L. Tolomeo, Sharp quasi-invariance threshold for the cubic Szeg¨ o equa tion, arXiv:2404.14950 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Debussche, Y

    A. Debussche, Y. Tsutsumi, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures transported by the c ubic NLS with third- order dispersion on T, J. Funct. Anal. 281 (2021), no. 3, 109032, 23 pp

    2021

  5. [13]

    Forlano, K

    J. Forlano, K. Seong, Transport of Gaussian measures under the flow of one-dimensi onal fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations,Comm. PDE, 47 (2022), no. 6, 1296–1337

    2022

  6. [14]

    Forlano, L

    J. Forlano, L. Tolomeo, On the unique ergodicity for a class of 2 dimensional stochas tic wave equations , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 377 (2024), 345–394

    2024

  7. [15]

    Forlano, L

    J. Forlano, L. Tolomeo, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures of negative regular ity for fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, to appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc

  8. [16]

    Forlano, L

    J. Forlano, L. Tolomeo, Quasi-invariance of the Gaussian measure for the two-dimen sional stochastic cubic nonlinear wave equation , arXiv:2409.20451 [math.PR]. QI FOR BO-BBM 21

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Forlano, W

    J. Forlano, W. J. Trenberth, On the transport of Gaussian measures under the one-dimensi onal fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 36 (2019), no. 7, 1987–2025

    2019

  10. [18]

    Genovese, R

    G. Genovese, R. Luc´ a, N. Tzvetkov, Transport of Gaussian measures with exponential cut-off for Hamiltonian PDEs, J. Anal. Math.150 (2023), no.2, 737–787

    2023

  11. [19]

    Genovese, R

    G. Genovese, R. Luc´ a, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures for the periodic Ben jamin-Ono- BBM equation, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.11(2023), no.2, 6 51–684

    2023

  12. [20]

    G´ erard, T

    P. G´ erard, T. Kappeler, P. Topalov, Sharp well-posedness results of the Benjamin-Ono equation in H s(T,R) and qualitative properties of its solution , Acta Math. 231 (2023), no. 1, 31–88

    2023

  13. [21]

    Gunaratnam, T

    T. Gunaratnam, T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, H. Weber, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the nonlinear wave equation in three dimensions , Probab. Math. Phys. 3 (2022), no. 2, 343–379

    2022

  14. [22]

    J. He, Y. Mammeri, Remark on the well-posedness of weakly dispersive equation s, SMAI 2017—8e Biennale Fran¸ caise des Math´ ematiques Appliqu´ ees et Industrielles, 111–120. ESAIM Proc. Surveys, 64 EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, 2018

    2017

  15. [23]

    Killip, T

    R. Killip, T. Laurens, M. Vi¸ san, Sharp well-posedness for the Benjamin-Ono equation , Invent. Math. 236 (2024), no. 3, 999–1054

    2024

  16. [24]

    Knezevitch, Transport of low regularity Gaussian measures for the 1d qui ntic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tion arXiv:2406.07116 [math.AP]

    A. Knezevitch, Transport of low regularity Gaussian measures for the 1d qui ntic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tion arXiv:2406.07116 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Mammeri, Long time bounds for the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equatio n, Nonlinear Anal

    Y. Mammeri, Long time bounds for the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equatio n, Nonlinear Anal. 71 (2009), no.10, 5010–5021

    2009

  18. [26]

    T. Oh, K. Seong, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth ord er nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tion in negative Sobolev spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 281 (2021), no. 9, 109150, 49 pp

    2021

  19. [27]

    T. Oh, P. Sosoe, N. Tzvetkov, An optimal regularity result on the quasi-invariant Gaussi an measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. ´Ec. polytech. Math. 5 (2018), 793–841

    2018

  20. [28]

    T. Oh, Y. Tsutsumi, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with third order dispersion , C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 357 (2019), no. 4, 366–381

    2019

  21. [29]

    T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth ord er nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Probab. Theory Related Fields 169 (2017), 1121–1168

    2017

  22. [30]

    T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the two-dimensiona l defocusing cubic nonlinear wave equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 22 (2020), no. 6, 1785–1826

    2020

  23. [31]

    Ono, Algebraic solitary waves in stratified fluids , J

    H. Ono, Algebraic solitary waves in stratified fluids , J. Phys. Soc. Japan 39 (1975) 1082–1091

    1975

  24. [32]

    Planchon, N

    F. Planchon, N. Tzvetkov, N. Visciglia, Transport of Gaussian measures by the flow of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Math. Ann. 378 (2020), no. 1-2, 389–423

    2020

  25. [33]

    Planchon, N

    F. Planchon, N. Tzvetkov, N. Visciglia, Modified energies for the periodic generalized KdV equation and applications, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 40 (2023), no. 4, 863–917

    2023

  26. [34]

    Sosoe, W

    P. Sosoe, W. Trenberth, T. Xian, Quasi-invariance of fractional Gaussian fields by the nonli near wave equa- tion with polynomial nonlinearity , Differential Integral Equations 33 (2020), no. 7-8, 393–43 0

    2020

  27. [35]

    Simon, The P (Φ)2 Euclidean (quantum) field theory , Princeton Series in Physics

    B. Simon, The P (Φ)2 Euclidean (quantum) field theory , Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1974. xx+392 pp

    1974

  28. [36]

    C. Sun, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures for the 3d energy cri tical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, arXiv:2308.12758 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Thomann, N

    L. Thomann, N. Tzvetkov, Gibbs measure for the periodic derivative nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equation , Non- linearity 23 (2010), no. 11, 2771–2791

    2010

  30. [38]

    Tolomeo, Global well-posedness of the two-dimensional stochastic n onlinear wave equation on an unbounded domain, Ann

    L. Tolomeo, Global well-posedness of the two-dimensional stochastic n onlinear wave equation on an unbounded domain, Ann. Probab. 49(3): 1402-1426 (May 2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Tolomeo, Unique ergodicity for a class of stochastic hyperbolic equa tions with additive space-time white noise, Comm

    L. Tolomeo, Unique ergodicity for a class of stochastic hyperbolic equa tions with additive space-time white noise, Comm. Math. Phys. 377 (2020), no. 2, 1311–1347

    2020

  32. [40]

    Tolomeo, Ergodicity for the hyperbolic P (Φ) 2-model, arXiv:2310.02190 [math.PR]

    L. Tolomeo, Ergodicity for the hyperbolic P (Φ) 2-model, arXiv:2310.02190 [math.PR]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for one dimensional Ham iltonian PDE’s, Forum Math

    N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for one dimensional Ham iltonian PDE’s, Forum Math. Sigma 3 (2015), e28, 35 pp

    2015

  34. [42]

    ¨Ust¨ unel,Variational calculation of Laplace transforms via entropy on Wiener space and applications , J

    A. ¨Ust¨ unel,Variational calculation of Laplace transforms via entropy on Wiener space and applications , J. Funct. Anal. 267 (2014), no. 8, 3058–3083. Justin Forlano, School of Mathematics, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia, and, School of Mathematics, The University of...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.