Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Estimating LLM Uncertainty with Evidence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.00290 v5 pith:H7IOBD4N submitted 2025-02-01 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords uncertaintytokenevidencellmslogtokureliabilityestimatingestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the past few years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and are widely applied in various domains. However, LLMs face the issue of hallucinations, generating responses that may be unreliable when the models lack relevant knowledge. To be aware of potential hallucinations, uncertainty estimation methods have been introduced, and most of them have confirmed that reliability lies in critical tokens. However, probability-based methods perform poorly in identifying token reliability, limiting their practical utility. In this paper, we reveal that the probability-based method fails to estimate token reliability due to the loss of evidence strength information which is accumulated in the training stage. Therefore, we present Logits-induced token uncertainty (LogTokU), a framework for estimating decoupled token uncertainty in LLMs, enabling real-time uncertainty estimation without requiring multiple sampling processes. We employ evidence modeling to implement LogTokU and use the estimated uncertainty to guide downstream tasks. The experimental results demonstrate that LogTokU has significant effectiveness and promise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can You Trust the Confidence? ConfBench for Vision-Language Models on Document Extraction

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision-language models vary widely in how trustworthy their confidence scores are on document extraction, with stronger models and OCR-plus-image input helping most, as measured on the new ConfBench benchmark.

  2. INSIGHT: INference-time Sequence Introspection for Generating Help Triggers in Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Token-level uncertainty sequences from a VLA policy, classified by a small transformer, predict when a robot should request human help better than static uncertainty scores.

Pith tools