Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Secondary spins of extreme mass ratio inspirals: A probe to the formation channels

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A kludge EMRI waveform including secondary spin shows the spin is measurable to absolute uncertainty about 0.1 at SNR 20 for eccentric and inclined orbits, and that high secondary spins would mark Hills-channel EMRIs.

desk verdict A useful forecast with a clean physical mechanism, but the headline precision numbers rest on a single spin orientation and a kludge waveform—worth refereeing, not believing at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00856 v4 pith:DWGOGZKQ submitted 2025-02-02 astro-ph.HE

Qiuxin Cui , Wen-Biao Han , Zhen Pan This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords extrememass-ratioinspiralssecondaryblackholespingravitationalwaveparameterestimationFisherinformationmatrixEMRIformationchannelsHillsmechanismMathisson-Papapetrou-Dixonequationsspacebornedetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the spin of the stellar-mass black hole in an extreme mass-ratio inspiral (EMRI) is measurable from future spaceborne gravitational-wave observations, and that a measured high spin would single out the Hills formation channel. The authors build a kludge (approximate) waveform model that evolves a spinning secondary through a Kerr spacetime using Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon equations plus post-Newtonian radiation reaction, then forecast parameter precision with a Fisher matrix. For eccentric and inclined orbits the absolute uncertainty on the dimensionless spin is about 0.1 at signal-to-noise ratio 20; for near-circular, near-equatorial orbits the spin is almost unconstrained. They then inject a synthetic EMRI population with spin distributions for the dry (loss-cone) and Hills (binary-disruption) formation channels and show that the branch ratio of the two channels can be recovered from 121 detectable events. The caveat they state is that the waveform model is not self-consistent, so the quantitative precision may be over- or underestimated.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the coupling between the secondary spin and the orbital motion through the spin-curvature (Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon) force, integrated numerically together with post-Newtonian fluxes to produce a kludge trajectory, and then a quadrupole-approximation gravitational waveform with time-delay-interferometry response. The load-bearing step is that the spin enters the dynamics at linear order through terms like $-\tfrac{1}{2m} R^{\mu}_{\rho\kappa\lambda} p^{\rho} S^{\kappa\lambda}$; on circular equatorial orbits the coupling terms built from $p_r$ vanish, decoupling spin from the waveform, while eccentric ($p_r \neq 0$) and inclined ($p_\theta \neq 0$) orbits switch on the coupling and make $s$ measurable. The population inference then uses a hierarchical Bayesian likelihood that treats each event's spin measurement as a Gaussian of width $\Delta s$ from the Fisher forecast.

What would settle it

Recompute the spin measurement uncertainty with a waveform that includes the first post-adiabatic dissipative spin terms (spin-dependent radiation reaction); if the resulting $\Delta s$ for, say, $e_0 = 0.2$, $\iota_0 = 0.5$ at SNR 20 moves outside roughly 0.05–0.2, the quantitative precision claim fails. A cheaper check is full Bayesian parameter estimation on one injected loud event: if the spin posterior is bimodal or strongly non-Gaussian, the Fisher approximation at the heart of the forecasts is not reliable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the secondary spin, previously thought unmeasurable from EMRI waveforms because equatorial-circular studies found errors far larger than 1, becomes a measurable parameter once the orbit has eccentricity and inclination. The reason is mechanical: the spin-curvature force in the MPD equations couples to the orbital momentum; for circular equatorial orbits the relevant momentum components vanish, while for eccentric orbits $p_r \neq 0$ and for inclined orbits $p_\theta \neq 0$, activating the coupling and imprinting the spin on the phase. At SNR 20 the forecast absolute uncertainty is $\Delta s \approx 0.1$, nearly independent of the spin value $s$, because the waveform depends on $s$ mostly linearly. As an astrophysical application, the paper proposes that dry EMRIs (formed by scattering in galactic nuclei) inherit low natal spins from isolated massive-star collapse, while Hills EMRIs (formed when a binary is tidally disrupted by the supermassive black hole) contain a bimodal spin population from tidally spun-up second-born black holes, so a robust detection of high secondary spin marks the Hills channel. A population injection–inference test with 121 detectable EMRIs recovers the dry fraction $f_{\mathrm{dry}}$ and the spread $\sigma_1$ of the low-spin component.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the simplified kludge waveform—linear conservative spin-curvature force only, spinless radiation reaction—captures the secondary spin's effect on the waveform phase accurately enough that the Fisher-based errors on the spin are representative.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For generic EMRI sources with non-negligible eccentricity or inclination, the secondary black hole's spin becomes a recoverable source parameter, adding a new observable to spaceborne gravitational-wave astronomy.
  • A confident detection of a high secondary spin will identify that EMRI as a Hills-channel event, even though dry and Hills sources have nearly identical orbital distributions.
  • With roughly 120 detected EMRIs, the fraction of dry versus Hills EMRIs can be constrained at the population level, giving a formation-channel census of galactic nuclei.
  • Secondary-spin measurements also carry information about stellar evolution, specifically the natal spins of isolated and binary massive stars and the efficiency of tidal spin-up.
  • For wet EMRIs, spin measurability depends on whether the accretion disk aligns orbits: coherent-disk sources would be hardest to assign spins, while misaligned sources could probe accretion history.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-independence of $\Delta s$ on the spin value suggests the measurement is essentially a phase-sensitivity question; with a more realistic waveform that changes the spin–phase correlation, the apparent plateau near 0.1 may break.
  • The population recovery assumed each event's spin likelihood is a single Gaussian; real parameter-estimation posteriors are often multimodal, so the recovered $f_{\mathrm{dry}}$ and $\sigma_1$ could carry biases not visible in this injection test.
  • The same mechanism implies that the spin orientation components ($s_\parallel$, $s_\perp$) become measurable for generic orbits, which the paper deliberately sets aside and which could sharpen channel discrimination.
  • A direct next test is to repeat the Fisher forecast at SNR 100 and check whether $\Delta s$ scales as $1/\rho$; a deviation would flag the need for a full Bayesian treatment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a kludge EMRI waveform model that includes the secondary (stellar-mass black hole) spin via the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with a conservative linear spin-curvature force, and uses Fisher information matrix forecasts with a Taiji/LISA TDI response to estimate the measurement precision of the secondary spin magnitude s. The authors find that Δs ≈ 0.1 can be achieved at SNR 20 for moderate-to-high eccentricity and inclination, while equatorial circular orbits give essentially no spin information. They then propose a population model for the secondary spin distribution of dry (loss-cone) and Hills EMRIs, and perform an injection-recovery study with hierarchical Bayesian inference, concluding that the Hills high-spin peak and the dry fraction f_dry could be measured from ~121 detectable events. The paper is explicit that the waveform model is not self-consistent, that same-order dissipative spin terms are omitted, and that Fisher methods have known limitations; the astrophysical conclusions are presented as an example application.

Significance. If the claimed secondary-spin measurability and the population discrimination hold, this would be an interesting new diagnostic for EMRI formation channels, complementing the orbital-eccentricity and orientation probes that otherwise leave dry and Hills EMRIs nearly degenerate. The paper's strength is that it goes beyond the equatorial/circular treatments of earlier work and identifies, through Eq. (44), a physically transparent coupling mechanism (spin-curvature force ∝ S^θ p_r) that should make the spin more visible for eccentric and inclined orbits. The authors also give a self-contained population model (Eqs. 45-55) and use a proper hierarchical likelihood, and they are candid about the model's caveats. The significance is therefore real but conditional: the quantitative Δs values and the recovered population are built on a Fisher analysis in a regime where it is known to be unreliable, on a waveform that omits same-order dissipative spin terms, and on a single initial spin orientation, so the headline numbers should be read as model-dependent forecasts rather than robust predictions.

major comments (4)
  1. [§II A and §III C] The forecast fixes the initial spin orientation to S^r_0 = S^φ_0 = 0 in Eq. (18), and the same orientation is used for every point in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, and for all 121 detectable events in the population study of Sec. III C, which samples orbital elements and extrinsic angles but never S^r_0 or S^φ_0. The spin-curvature force in Eq. (41) depends on the full spin vector, and the explicit equatorial example in Eq. (44) shows that the effect is proportional to S^θ p_r; an orientation with suppressed S^θ would suppress the very coupling the measurement relies on. Because the headline claim of 'generic eccentric and inclined' precision (Abstract) is exactly these Fisher forecasts, the paper needs to demonstrate that Δs is robust to random initial spin orientations, or at least to quote the range of Δs obtained by varying S^r_0 and S^φ_0. As written, the claimed precision and the recovered Hills high-spin peak in Fig. 5 may reflect a single favorable geometry.
  2. [§II A, Eqs. (15)-(17)] The waveform model is not self-consistent at the order used for the forecast: the conservative linear spin-curvature force is included in Eq. (17), but the radiation-reaction terms in Eq. (15) are the spinless PN fluxes of Ref. [75], so the same-order (1PA) dissipative spin effects are absent. The paper itself acknowledges in Sec. I that the model 'may overestimate or underestimate the accuracy of the secondary spin measurements' and repeats this caveat in the Conclusion. This is not a cosmetic limitation: the Fisher derivative ∂h/∂s, which sets Δs in Eq. (40), is built from the waveform phase evolution, and an omitted force at the same order in the mass ratio can change that phase coherently over the 10^4-10^5 cycles quoted in Sec. I. The quantitative values Δs ≈ 0.1 in Figs. 2-3 and the population-level conclusions built on them therefore should be presented as conditional on this omission, and the authors should either estimate the size of the neglected dissipative spin terms (e.g., using the recent flux results cited as Refs. [33,34,36]) or clearly label the numbers as order-of-magnitude illustrations rather than forecasts.
  3. [§III B and §III C, Eqs. (56)-(58)] The formation-channel demonstration is an injection-recovery test that uses the same spin distribution P(s|Λ) of Eqs. (45)-(54) to generate the injected events and the same Fisher-based likelihood of Eq. (58) to analyze them, with the per-event width Δs taken from the same kludge model that was used to simulate the injections. Such a test verifies internal consistency of the likelihood and prior, but it cannot validate the claim that the secondary spin can actually separate dry from Hills EMRIs; if Δs were systematically underestimated by a factor of a few, or if the true population differed from the assumed mixture, the recovered bimodal structure in Fig. 5 would weaken or disappear. A more informative test would use a different waveform model or a full Bayesian analysis for a subset of events, or would at least vary the measurement-error model in the recovery. As it stands, the population statement is conditional on the very model whose precision is the object of the forecast.
  4. [§II B, Eq. (40)] The Fisher information matrix is used at SNR = 20 for an 18-parameter problem (Eq. 29) with strong parameter correlations, a regime where the FIM is known to be unreliable for EMRI-type signals; the paper cites Refs. [84,85] and concedes in the Conclusion that the 'insufficiently verified use of Fisher-Matrix analysis' may introduce uncertainties. Since the central quantitative claims (Δs ≈ 0.1, and the population inference built on Δs via Eq. 58) depend directly on the inverse FIM, the authors should provide at least one validation check, for example a full Bayesian posterior for a few representative eccentric/inclined configurations, or a comparison with a different fiducial waveform or a higher-order Fisher treatment. Without such a check, the reported uncertainties are formal Cramér-Rao bounds, not expected measurement errors, and the abstract's 'reasonably good precision' should be softened accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (16a)] The definition of the semi-latus rectum as p = r_max r_min / (r_max + r_min) appears to miss the standard factor of 2; for Keplerian orbits p = 2 r_max r_min / (r_max + r_min). Please check whether this is a typo or an intentional nonstandard convention, since p0 is used as an input for the waveforms in Figs. 1-3.
  2. [Sec. I] The names 'Mathison-Papapetrous-Dixon' should be 'Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon', and 'Taji' in the detector discussion should be 'Taiji'.
  3. [Eq. (15c)] The notation '2g2θθ pθFθ' in Eq. (15c) is garbled; it should presumably read 2 g_{θθ}^2 p_θ F_θ.
  4. [Sec. III C] The phrase 'When sampling the 2nd spin s' is informal; please write 'when sampling the secondary spin s'.
  5. [Sec. IV] The Conclusions state 'we forecast the LISA measurement precision' although the calculations use the Taiji response; the earlier remark that Taiji and LISA have nearly identical sensitivity is fine, but the wording should be made consistent throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measurability forecast is a self-contained Fisher analysis of a kludge waveform, and the population study is an explicitly framed injection-recovery test rather than an independent empirical validation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that the secondary spin may be measured to moderate precision for generic eccentric and inclined EMRIs, is obtained from a waveform model built on the MPD equations (Eqs. 3-5), the spin-curvature force (Eq. 41), and a Fisher information matrix forecast (Eqs. 38-40). The secondary spin enters through the waveform derivative with respect to s, which is not fitted to the astrophysical spin distributions. The population analysis in Sec. III is an injection-recovery experiment: the simulated detectable events are drawn from P(s|Lambda_0) and analyzed with the same family P(s|Lambda) using a likelihood whose variance is the previously computed Fisher uncertainty. This tests the statistical pipeline's ability to recover assumed population parameters; it does not independently confirm the astrophysical model, and the paper explicitly states that 'this conclusion depends on the validity of Eqs. (53,54)'. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness theorem is invoked, and no known result is repackaged as new. The fixed initial spin orientation (S^r_0 = S^phi_0 = 0) and the omission of same-order dissipative spin terms are modeling limitations that the paper acknowledges ('may overestimate or underestimate the accuracy of the secondary spin measurements'); these affect robustness and correctness risk, but they do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, fields, or exotic entities are introduced; the spin is standard black hole angular momentum. The central claim rests on the fidelity of the kludge waveform, the validity of the Fisher approximation, and the astrophysical spin-distribution parameterizations, all of which are acknowledged in the text.

free parameters (5)
  • sigma1 = 0.1 (fiducial injection; inferred in posterior)
    Width of the low-spin Gaussian for dry-channel and first-born BHs, Eq. (45). Chosen to match LVK low-spin observations; a free parameter of the population model.
  • sigma2 = 0.1 (fiducial injection; inferred in posterior)
    Width of the high-spin Gaussian peak for tidally locked second-born BHs, Eq. (49).
  • log10_s2min = -4 (fiducial)
    Log of the minimum spin of non-synchronized second-born BHs, from binary evolution Ref. [68]; poorly constrained by the injection (Sec. III C).
  • eta = 0.4 (fiducial)
    Fraction of wide binaries among second-born BHs, Eq. (50); derived from a logUniform separation distribution and Ref. [68].
  • fdry = 0.5 (true injection; recovered in posterior)
    Fraction of EMRIs from the dry channel in the mixed population, Eq. (55); highly uncertain in advance and the key parameter recovered by the population inference.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with the Tulczyjew-Dixon spin supplementary condition describe the motion of the spinning secondary black hole.
    Standard GR extended-body formalism, adopted in Sec. II A (Eqs. 3-6).
  • domain assumption Spin effects can be truncated at linear order in the spin vector S (Eqs. 41-43).
    Linear spin approximation is common for EMRI modeling; higher-order spin and finite-size effects are neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper The spinless PN radiation reaction fluxes of Ref. [75] can drive the inspiral even when the secondary is spinning.
    The paper discards S-dependent terms in F_mu and acknowledges this may over- or underestimate the measurement precision (Sec. I).
  • standard math The quadrupole formula (Eqs. 19-21) is adequate for the emitted gravitational waveform.
    Leading-order radiation formula for h_TT; used throughout the literature for kludge EMRI waveforms.
  • domain assumption The Fisher information matrix yields a faithful estimate of parameter uncertainties at SNR 20.
    Invoked in Sec. II B with explicit warning of known inadequacies (Refs [84,85]); no Bayesian cross-check is performed.
  • ad hoc to paper Dry EMRIs have a low-spin Gaussian distribution P1(s) (Eq. 45), and Hills EMRIs follow an equal mixture of P1 and P2 (Eq. 54), with P2 built from a logUniform wide-binary component and a Gaussian peak at s=1 (Eqs. 47-50).
    These parameterizations are motivated by LVK and binary evolution literature, but the exact functional forms, the equal first- and second-born capture fraction, and the fiducial eta about 0.4 are assumed for the injection. The paper acknowledges the conclusion depends on their validity.
  • domain assumption Binary separations in the Hills channel are logUniformly distributed between Ab,min and Ab,max with values from Ref. [68].
    Used to derive eta = log(Ab,max/Ab,sync)/log(Ab,max/Ab,min) in Sec. III A.
  • domain assumption The EMRI rate model and the rho greater than or equal to 20 detection threshold adequately describe the detectable population, leading to Ndet = 121.
    Rates from Refs [47,55] and a fixed SNR threshold determine the injected detectable population in Sec. III C.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Secondary spins of extreme mass ratio inspirals: A probe to the formation channels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DWGOGZKQ

@misc{pith2026250200856,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Secondary spins of extreme mass ratio inspirals: A probe to the formation channels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DWGOGZKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00856}
}
read the original abstract

Extreme mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs), consisting of a secondary (stellar mass) black hole (BH) orbiting around a supermassive BH, are one of the primary targets for future spaceborne gravitational wave (GW) detectors. The spin of the secondary BH encodes the formation history of the stellar mass BH and the formation process of the EMRI. In this work, we construct a kludge EMRI waveform model taking the secondary spin into account and preliminarily forecast the measurement precision of the secondary spin by future spaceborne GW detectors with the Fisher information matrix. We find the secondary spin might be measured with reasonably good precision for generic eccentric and inclined EMRIs, with the caveat that the predictive precision may be constrained by the model's inherent simplifications. As an example of its astrophysical applications, we propose that the secondary spin can be used for distinguishing dry (loss cone) EMRIs (where the secondary BHs were born in the collapse of individual massive stars and are of low spin) and Hills EMRIs (where the secondary BHs are remnants of massive star binaries and the secondary spins follow a bimodal distribution).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00856 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The characteristic strain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The expected measurement uncertainties [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Posterior distribution of the population parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Distributions of secondary spins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coherent End-to-End Search for Generic Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hierarchical search that uses the clustering of high-likelihood secondary maxima recovers generic EMRI signals in 14-dimensional parameter space from simulated LISA data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [75]

    Improved approx- imate inspirals of test bodies into Kerr black holes,

    Jonathan R. Gair and Kostas Glampedakis, “Improved approx- imate inspirals of test bodies into Kerr black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 064037 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0510129 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2006

  2. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, C. Affeldt, M. Agathos, K. Agat- suma, N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar, L. Aiello, A. Ain, P. Ajith, B. Allen, A. Allocca, P. A. Altin, S. B. Anderson, W. G. An- derson, K. Arai, M. A. Arain, M. C. Araya, C. C. Arceneaux, ...

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, C. Affeldt, D. Agar- wal, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar, L. Aiello, A. Ain, P. Ajith, S. Akcay, T. Akutsu, S. Albanesi, A. Allocca, P. A. Altin, A. Amato, C. Anand, S. Anand, A. Ananyeva, S. B. Anderson, W. G. Anderson, M. Ando, T. And...

    arXiv 2023

  4. [3]

    Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna,

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, John Baker, Enrico Barausse, Peter Bender, Emanuele Berti, Pierre Binetruy, Michael Born, Daniele Bortoluzzi, Jordan Camp, Chiara Caprini, Vitor Cardoso, Monica Colpi, John Conklin, Neil Cornish, Curt Cutler, Karsten Danzmann, Rita Dolesi, Luigi Ferraioli, Valerio Ferroni, Ewan Fitzsimons, Jonathan Gair, ...

    arXiv 2017

  5. [4]

    Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,

    Wen-Hong Ruan, Zong-Kuan Guo, Rong-Gen Cai, and Yuan- Zhong Zhang, “Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,” In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics A 35, 2050075 (2020)

    2020

  6. [5]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,

    Jun Luo, Li-Sheng Chen, Hui-Zong Duan, Yun-Gui Gong, Shoucun Hu, Jianghui Ji, Qi Liu, Jianwei Mei, Vadim Mi- lyukov, Mikhail Sazhin, Cheng-Gang Shao, Viktor T. Toth, Hai- Bo Tu, Yamin Wang, Yan Wang, Hsien-Chi Yeh, Ming-Sheng Zhan, Yonghe Zhang, Vladimir Zharov, and Ze-Bing Zhou, “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,” Classi- cal and Quantu...

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Testing General Relativity with Low- Frequency, Space-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors,

    Jonathan R. Gair, Michele Vallisneri, Shane L. Larson, and John G. Baker, “Testing General Relativity with Low- Frequency, Space-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors,” Liv- ing Reviews in Relativity 16, 7 (2013), arXiv:1212.5575 [gr- qc]. 11

    arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Environmental e ffects in extreme mass ratio inspirals: perturbations to the environ- ment in Kerr,

    Conor Dyson, Thomas F. M. Spieksma, Richard Brito, Maarten van de Meent, and Sam Dolan, “Environmental e ffects in extreme mass ratio inspirals: perturbations to the environ- ment in Kerr,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.09806 (2025), arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Tidal res- onance in extreme mass-ratio inspirals,

    B ´eatrice Bonga, Huan Yang, and Scott A. Hughes, “Tidal res- onance in extreme mass-ratio inspirals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101103 (2019), arXiv:1905.00030 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Observ- able signatures of extreme mass-ratio inspiral black hole bina- ries embedded in thin accretion disks,

    Bence Kocsis, Nicol ´as Yunes, and Abraham Loeb, “Observ- able signatures of extreme mass-ratio inspiral black hole bina- ries embedded in thin accretion disks,” Phys. Rev. D84, 024032 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Imprint of Accretion Disk-Induced Migration on Gravitational Waves from Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals,

    Nicol ´as Yunes, Bence Kocsis, Abraham Loeb, and Zolt ´an Haiman, “Imprint of Accretion Disk-Induced Migration on Gravitational Waves from Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 171103 (2011), arXiv:1103.4609 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Probing accretion physics with gravitational waves,

    Lorenzo Speri, Andrea Antonelli, Laura Sberna, Stanislav Babak, Enrico Barausse, Jonathan R. Gair, and Michael L. Katz, “Probing accretion physics with gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. X 13, 021035 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    De- tectability of gas-rich E/IMRI’s in LISA band: observable sig- nature of transonic accretion flow,

    Sangita Chatterjee, Soumen Mondal, and Prasad Basu, “De- tectability of gas-rich E/IMRI’s in LISA band: observable sig- nature of transonic accretion flow,” MNRAS 526, 5612–5627 (2023), arXiv:2307.12144 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Constraining accretion physics with gravitational waves from eccentric extreme-mass-ratio inspi- rals,

    Francisco Duque, Shubham Kejriwal, Laura Sberna, Lorenzo Speri, and Jonathan Gair, “Constraining accretion physics with gravitational waves from eccentric extreme-mass-ratio inspi- rals,” (2024), arXiv:2411.03436 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Dynamic Signatures of Black Hole Binaries with Superradiant Clouds,

    Jun Zhang and Huan Yang, “Dynamic Signatures of Black Hole Binaries with Superradiant Clouds,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 043020 (2020), arXiv:1907.13582 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Gravitational floating orbits around hairy black holes,

    Jun Zhang and Huan Yang, “Gravitational floating orbits around hairy black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 064018 (2019), arXiv:1808.02905 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Extreme mass-ratio inspi- rals into black holes surrounded by scalar clouds,

    Richard Brito and Shreya Shah, “Extreme mass-ratio inspi- rals into black holes surrounded by scalar clouds,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 084019 (2023), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 109902 (2024)], arXiv:2307.16093 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals in Ultra- light Dark Matter,

    Francisco Duque, Caio F. B. Macedo, Rodrigo Vicente, and Vitor Cardoso, “Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals in Ultra- light Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 121404 (2024), arXiv:2312.06767 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Republication of: New mechanics of ma- terial systems,

    Myron Mathisson, “Republication of: New mechanics of ma- terial systems,” General Relativity and Gravitation 42, 1011– 1048 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Spinning Test-Particles in General Relativity. I,

    A. Papapetrou, “Spinning Test-Particles in General Relativity. I,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 209, 248–258 (1951)

    1951

  13. [21]

    Dynamics of Extended Bodies in General Rela- tivity. I. Momentum and Angular Momentum,

    W. G. Dixon, “Dynamics of Extended Bodies in General Rela- tivity. I. Momentum and Angular Momentum,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 314, 499–527 (1970)

    1970

  14. [22]

    Dynamics of Extended Bodies in General Rela- tivity. III. Equations of Motion,

    W. G. Dixon, “Dynamics of Extended Bodies in General Rela- tivity. III. Equations of Motion,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 277, 59–119 (1974)

    1974

  15. [23]

    Gravi- tational waves induced by a spinning particle falling into a ro- tating black hole,

    Yasushi Mino, Masaru Shibata, and Takahiro Tanaka, “Gravi- tational waves induced by a spinning particle falling into a ro- tating black hole,” Phys. Rev. D53, 622–634 (1996)

    1996

  16. [24]

    Gravitational waves from a spinning particle in circu- lar orbits around a rotating black hole,

    Takahiro Tanaka, Yasushi Mino, Misao Sasaki, and Masaru Shibata, “Gravitational waves from a spinning particle in circu- lar orbits around a rotating black hole,” Phys. Rev. D54, 3762– 3777 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9602038 [gr-qc]

    1996 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gravitational radiation from a spinning com- pact object around a supermassive Kerr black hole in circular orbit,

    Wen-Biao Han, “Gravitational radiation from a spinning com- pact object around a supermassive Kerr black hole in circular orbit,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 084013 (2010), arXiv:1008.3324 [gr- qc]

    2010 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Importance of including small body spin e ffects in the modelling of extreme and inter- mediate mass-ratio inspirals,

    E. A. Huerta and Jonathan R. Gair, “Importance of including small body spin e ffects in the modelling of extreme and inter- mediate mass-ratio inspirals,” Phys. Rev. D 84, 064023 (2011), arXiv:1105.3567 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    E. A. Huerta, Jonathan R. Gair, and Duncan A. Brown, “Im- portance of including small body spin e ffects in the modelling of intermediate mass-ratio inspirals. II. Accurate parameter ex- traction of strong sources using higher-order spin effects,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 064023 (2012...

    2012 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Assessing the detectability of the secondary spin in extreme mass-ratio inspirals with fully relativistic numerical waveforms,

    Gabriel Andres Piovano, Richard Brito, Andrea Maselli, and Paolo Pani, “Assessing the detectability of the secondary spin in extreme mass-ratio inspirals with fully relativistic numerical waveforms,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 124019 (2021), arXiv:2105.07083 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    General formalism for dirty extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,

    Ye Jiang and Wen-Biao Han, “General formalism for dirty extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,” Science China Physics, Mechan- ics, and Astronomy 67, 270411 (2024), arXiv:2312.04320 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Distinguishability of binary extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in low frequency band,

    Ye Jiang, Wen-Biao Han, Xing-Yu Zhong, Ping Shen, Zi- Ren Luo, and Yue-Liang Wu, “Distinguishability of binary extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in low frequency band,” European Physical Journal C 84, 478 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Prospects for determining the nature of the secondaries of extreme mass- ratio inspirals using the spin-induced quadrupole deformation,

    Mostafizur Rahman and Arpan Bhattacharyya, “Prospects for determining the nature of the secondaries of extreme mass- ratio inspirals using the spin-induced quadrupole deformation,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 024006 (2023), arXiv:2112.13869 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Precisely computing bound orbits of spinning bodies around black holes. II. Generic orbits,

    Lisa V . Drummond and Scott A. Hughes, “Precisely computing bound orbits of spinning bodies around black holes. II. Generic orbits,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 124041 (2022), arXiv:2201.13335 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Asymptotic gravitational- wave fluxes from a spinning test body on generic orbits around a Kerr black hole,

    Viktor Skoup ´y, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Lisa V . Drum- mond, and Scott A. Hughes, “Asymptotic gravitational- wave fluxes from a spinning test body on generic orbits around a Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 044041 (2023), arXiv:2303.16798 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Spinning particles near Kerr black holes: Orbits and gravitational-wave fluxes through the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism,

    Gabriel Andres Piovano, Christiana Pantelidou, Jake Mac Uil- liam, and V ojt ˇech Witzany, “Spinning particles near Kerr black holes: Orbits and gravitational-wave fluxes through the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.05769 (2024), arXiv:2410.05769 [gr-qc]

    2024

  27. [35]

    Hamilton-Jacobi equation for spinning par- ticles near black holes,

    V ojtˇech Witzany, “Hamilton-Jacobi equation for spinning par- ticles near black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 104030 (2019), arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Post-Newtonian expan- sions of extreme mass ratio inspirals of spinning bodies into Schwarzschild black holes,

    Viktor Skoup ´y and V ojtˇech Witzany, “Post-Newtonian expan- sions of extreme mass ratio inspirals of spinning bodies into Schwarzschild black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 084061 (2024), arXiv:2406.14291 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Extreme mass-ratio inspiral and waveforms for a spinning body into a Kerr black hole via osculating geodesics and near-identity transforma- tions,

    Lisa V . Drummond, Philip Lynch, Alexandra G. Hanselman, Devin R. Becker, and Scott A. Hughes, “Extreme mass-ratio inspiral and waveforms for a spinning body into a Kerr black hole via osculating geodesics and near-identity transforma- tions,” Phys. Rev. D109, 064030 (2024), a...

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Analytic solution for the motion of spinning particles in Kerr space-time,

    Viktor Skoup ´y and V ojtˇech Witzany, “Analytic solution for the motion of spinning particles in Kerr space-time,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.16855 (2024), arXiv:2411.16855 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gravitational waves from a spinning particle plunging into a Kerr black hole,

    Motoyuki Saijo, Kei-Ichi Maeda, Masaru Shibata, and Yasushi Mino, “Gravitational waves from a spinning particle plunging into a Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. D58, 064005 (1998)

    1998

  32. [40]

    Assessing the im- portance of first postadiabatic terms for small-mass-ratio bina- 12 ries,

    Ollie Burke, Gabriel Andres Piovano, Niels Warburton, Philip Lynch, Lorenzo Speri, Chris Kavanagh, Barry Wardell, Adam Pound, Leanne Durkan, and Jeremy Miller, “Assessing the im- portance of first postadiabatic terms for small-mass-ratio bina- 12 ries,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 12404...

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Evolutionary roads leading to low e ffective spins, high black hole masses, and O1 /O2 rates for LIGO /Virgo bi- nary black holes,

    K. Belczynski, J. Klencki, C. E. Fields, A. Olejak, E. Berti, G. Meynet, C. L. Fryer, D. E. Holz, R. O’Shaughnessy, D. A. Brown, T. Bulik, S. C. Leung, K. Nomoto, P. Madau, R. Hirschi, E. Kaiser, S. Jones, S. Mondal, M. Chruslinska, P. Drozda, D. Gerosa, Z. Doctor, M. Giersz, ...

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Model independent tests of the Kerr bound with extreme mass ratio inspirals,

    Gabriel Andres Piovano, Andrea Maselli, and Paolo Pani, “Model independent tests of the Kerr bound with extreme mass ratio inspirals,” Physics Letters B 811, 135860 (2020), arXiv:2003.08448 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Distinguishing Compact Ob- jects in Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals by Gravitational Waves,

    Lujia Xu, Shucheng Yang, Wenbiao Han, Xingyu Zhong, Run- dong Tang, and Yuanhao Zhang, “Distinguishing Compact Ob- jects in Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals by Gravitational Waves,” Universe 11, 18 (2025), arXiv:2209.01110 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    The Orbital Statistics of Stellar Inspiral and Relaxation near a Massive Black Hole: Characterizing Gravitational Wave Sources,

    Clovis Hopman and Tal Alexander, “The Orbital Statistics of Stellar Inspiral and Relaxation near a Massive Black Hole: Characterizing Gravitational Wave Sources,” Astrophys. J.629, 362–372 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503672 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    On Strong Mass Segre- gation Around a Massive Black Hole: Implications for Lower- Frequency Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics,

    Miguel Preto and Pau Amaro-Seoane, “On Strong Mass Segre- gation Around a Massive Black Hole: Implications for Lower- Frequency Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics,” Astroph.J.Lett. 708, L42–L46 (2010), arXiv:0910.3206 [astro-ph.GA]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Steady-state Relativistic Stel- lar Dynamics Around a Massive Black hole,

    Ben Bar-Or and Tal Alexander, “Steady-state Relativistic Stel- lar Dynamics Around a Massive Black hole,” Astrophys. J.820, 129 (2016), arXiv:1508.01390 [astro-ph.GA]

    2016 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V . Extreme mass-ratio inspirals,

    Stanislav Babak, Jonathan Gair, Alberto Sesana, Enrico Ba- rausse, Carlos F. Sopuerta, Christopher P. L. Berry, Emanuele Berti, Pau Amaro-Seoane, Antoine Petiteau, and Antoine Klein, “Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V . Extreme mass-ratio inspirals,” Phys. Re...

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals,

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, “Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals,” Living Reviews in Relativity 21, 4 (2018), arXiv:1205.5240 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Extreme mass ratio inspirals and tidal dis- ruption events in nuclear clusters - I. Time-dependent rates,

    Luca Broggi, Elisa Bortolas, Matteo Bonetti, Alberto Sesana, and Massimo Dotti, “Extreme mass ratio inspirals and tidal dis- ruption events in nuclear clusters - I. Time-dependent rates,” MNRAS 514, 3270–3284 (2022), arXiv:2205.06277 [astro- ph.GA]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hyper-velocity and tidal stars from binaries dis- rupted by a massive Galactic black hole,

    J. G. Hills, “Hyper-velocity and tidal stars from binaries dis- rupted by a massive Galactic black hole,” Nature (London)331, 687–689 (1988)

    1988

  43. [51]

    Binary Encounters with Supermassive Black Holes: Zero-Eccentricity LISA Events,

    M. Coleman Miller, Marc Freitag, Douglas P. Hamilton, and Vanessa M. Lauburg, “Binary Encounters with Supermassive Black Holes: Zero-Eccentricity LISA Events,” Astroph.J.Lett. 631, L117–L120 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507133 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gravitational-wave background from compact objects embed- ded in active galactic nuclei accretion disks,

    G ¨unter Sigl, Jeremy Schnittman, and Alessandra Buonanno, “Gravitational-wave background from compact objects embed- ded in active galactic nuclei accretion disks,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 024034 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0610680 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Starbursts near supermassive black holes: young stars in the Galactic Centre, and gravitational waves in LISA band,

    Yuri Levin, “Starbursts near supermassive black holes: young stars in the Galactic Centre, and gravitational waves in LISA band,” MNRAS 374, 515–524 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0603583 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Formation rate of extreme mass ra- tio inspirals in active galactic nuclei,

    Zhen Pan and Huan Yang, “Formation rate of extreme mass ra- tio inspirals in active galactic nuclei,” Phys. Rev. D103, 103018 (2021), arXiv:2101.09146 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Wet extreme mass ratio inspirals may be more common for spaceborne gravi- tational wave detection,

    Zhen Pan, Zhenwei Lyu, and Huan Yang, “Wet extreme mass ratio inspirals may be more common for spaceborne gravi- tational wave detection,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 063007 (2021), arXiv:2104.01208 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Supercritical Accretion of Stellar- mass Compact Objects in Active Galactic Nuclei,

    Zhen Pan and Huan Yang, “Supercritical Accretion of Stellar- mass Compact Objects in Active Galactic Nuclei,” Astrophys. J. 923, 173 (2021), arXiv:2108.00267 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mass-gap ex- treme mass ratio inspirals,

    Zhen Pan, Zhenwei Lyu, and Huan Yang, “Mass-gap ex- treme mass ratio inspirals,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 083005 (2022), arXiv:2112.10237 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    In situ extreme mass ra- tio inspirals via subparsec formation and migration of stars in thin, gravitationally unstable AGN discs,

    Andrea Derdzinski and Lucio Mayer, “In situ extreme mass ra- tio inspirals via subparsec formation and migration of stars in thin, gravitationally unstable AGN discs,” MNRAS521, 4522– 4543 (2023), arXiv:2205.10382 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Extreme mass-ratio gravitational-wave sources: mass segregation and post binary tidal-disruption captures,

    Yael Raveh and Hagai B. Perets, “Extreme mass-ratio gravitational-wave sources: mass segregation and post binary tidal-disruption captures,” MNRAS 501, 5012–5020 (2021), arXiv:2011.13952 [astro-ph.GA]

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nu- clei with quasiperiodic eruptions,

    Cong Zhou, Lei Huang, Kangrou Guo, Ya-Ping Li, and Zhen Pan, “Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nu- clei with quasiperiodic eruptions,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 103031 (2024), arXiv:2401.11190 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nu- clei with quasiperiodic eruptions. II. Population analysis,

    Cong Zhou, Binyu Zhong, Yuhe Zeng, Lei Huang, and Zhen Pan, “Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nu- clei with quasiperiodic eruptions. II. Population analysis,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 083019 (2024), arXiv:2405.06429 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nuclei with quasi- periodic eruptions – III: Long term evolution,

    Cong Zhou, Yuhe Zeng, and Zhen Pan, “Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nuclei with quasi- periodic eruptions – III: Long term evolution,” (2024), arXiv:2411.18046 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Constraints on bi- nary black hole populations from LIGO–Virgo detections,

    Javier Roulet and Matias Zaldarriaga, “Constraints on bi- nary black hole populations from LIGO–Virgo detections,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 484, 4216–4229 (2019), arXiv:1806.10610 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating,

    Jim Fuller and Linhao Ma, “Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating,” Astroph.J.Lett. 881, L1 (2019), arXiv:1907.03714 [astro-ph.SR]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [67]

    The expected spins of gravitational wave sources with iso- lated field binary progenitors,

    Matias Zaldarriaga, Doron Kushnir, and Juna A. Kollmeier, “The expected spins of gravitational wave sources with iso- lated field binary progenitors,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473, 4174–4178 (2018), arXiv:1702.00885 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [68]

    The origin of spin in binary black holes: Predicting the distributions of the main observables of Advanced LIGO,

    Simone S. Bavera, Tassos Fragos, Ying Qin, Emmanouil Za- partas, Coenraad J. Neijssel, Ilya Mandel, Aldo Batta, Sebas- tian M. Gaebel, Chase Kimball, and Simon Stevenson, “The origin of spin in binary black holes: Predicting the distributions of the main observables of Advance...

    2020 arXiv

  59. [69]

    An alternative interpretation of GW190412 as a binary black hole merger with a rapidly spinning secondary,

    Ilya Mandel and Tassos Fragos, “An alternative interpretation of GW190412 as a binary black hole merger with a rapidly spinning secondary,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 895, L28 (2020), arXiv:2004.09288 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [70]

    Which Black Hole Is Spinning? Probing the Ori- gin of Black Hole Spin with Gravitational Waves,

    Christian Adamcewicz, Shanika Galaudage, Paul D. Lasky, and Eric Thrane, “Which Black Hole Is Spinning? Probing the Ori- gin of Black Hole Spin with Gravitational Waves,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 964, L6 (2024), arXiv:2311.05182 [astro-ph.HE]. 13

    2024 arXiv

  61. [71]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

    LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group, Niayesh Af- shordi, Sarp Akc ¸ay, Pau Amaro Seoane, Andrea Antonelli, Josu C. Aurrekoetxea, Leor Barack, Enrico Barausse, Robert Benkel, Laura Bernard, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Emanuele Berti, Matteo Bonetti, B ´eatrice Bonga, Gabriele Bozzo...

    2023 arXiv

  62. [72]

    Conserved Quantities of Spin- ning Test Particles in General Relativity. I,

    R. R ¨udiger and Roger Penrose, “Conserved Quantities of Spin- ning Test Particles in General Relativity. I,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sci- ences 375, 185–193 (1981)

    1981

  63. [73]

    Conserved Quantities of Spinning Test Particles in General Relativity. II,

    R. Rudiger, “Conserved Quantities of Spinning Test Particles in General Relativity. II,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 385, 229–239 (1983)

    1983

  64. [74]

    Complete set of quasi- conserved quantities for spinning particles around Kerr,

    Geo ffrey Comp`ere and Adrien Druart, “Complete set of quasi- conserved quantities for spinning particles around Kerr,” Sci- Post Physics 12, 012 (2022), arXiv:2105.12454 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [76]

    Celestial mechanics in Kerr spacetime,

    W. Schmidt, “Celestial mechanics in Kerr spacetime,” Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity 19, 2743–2764 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0202090 [gr-qc]

    2002

  66. [77]

    Cancellation of laser noise in an unequal-arm interferometer detector of gravitational radiation,

    Massimo Tinto and J. W. Armstrong, “Cancellation of laser noise in an unequal-arm interferometer detector of gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D59, 102003 (1999)

    1999

  67. [78]

    Time- delay interferometry for LISA,

    Massimo Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, and J. W. Armstrong, “Time- delay interferometry for LISA,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 082003 (2002)

    2002

  68. [79]

    Time delay interferometry with moving spacecraft arrays,

    Massimo Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, and J. W. Armstrong, “Time delay interferometry with moving spacecraft arrays,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 082001 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310017 [gr-qc]

    2004 arXiv

  69. [80]

    Time-Delay Inter- ferometry,

    Massimo Tinto and Sanjeev V . Dhurandhar, “Time-Delay Inter- ferometry,” Living Reviews in Relativity17, 6 (2014)

    2014

  70. [81]

    Assessing the data-analysis impact of LISA orbit approximations using a GPU-accelerated response model,

    Michael L. Katz, Jean-Baptiste Bayle, Alvin J. K. Chua, and Michele Vallisneri, “Assessing the data-analysis impact of LISA orbit approximations using a GPU-accelerated response model,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 103001 (2022), arXiv:2204.06633 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [82]

    Gravitational- wave sensitivity curves,

    C. J. Moore, R. H. Cole, and C. P. L. Berry, “Gravitational- wave sensitivity curves,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 32, 015014 (2015), arXiv:1408.0740 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [83]

    Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform\?

    Curt Cutler and ´Eanna E. Flanagan, “Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform\?” Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658–2697 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9402014 [gr-qc]

    1994 arXiv

  73. [84]

    Inadequacies of the Fisher information matrix in gravitational-wave parameter estimation,

    Carl L. Rodriguez, Benjamin Farr, Will M. Farr, and Ilya Mandel, “Inadequacies of the Fisher information matrix in gravitational-wave parameter estimation,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 084013 (2013), arXiv:1308.1397 [astro-ph.IM]

    2013 arXiv

  74. [85]

    Use and abuse of the Fisher informa- tion matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter- estimation prospects,

    Michele Vallisneri, “Use and abuse of the Fisher informa- tion matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter- estimation prospects,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0703086 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  75. [86]

    The Origin of Inequality: Isolated Formation of a 30 +10 M⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger,

    A. Olejak, M. Fishbach, K. Belczynski, D. E. Holz, J. P. Lasota, M. C. Miller, and T. Bulik, “The Origin of Inequality: Isolated Formation of a 30 +10 M⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger,” As- troph.J.Lett. 901, L39 (2020), arXiv:2004.11866 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [87]

    Tidal friction in close binary systems

    J. P. Zahn, “Tidal friction in close binary systems.” Astron- omy&Astrophysics 57, 383–394 (1977)

    1977

  77. [88]

    Rudolf Kippenhahn and Alfred Weigert, Stellar Structure and Evolution , 2nd ed., Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  78. [89]

    Bi- nary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, “Bi- nary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,” Astroph.J.Lett. 882, L24 (2019), arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [90]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3,

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabora- tion, and the KAGRA Collaboration, “The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2111.03634 (2021), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [91]

    DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences,

    Joshua S. Speagle, “DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences,” MNRAS 493, 3132–3158 (2020), arXiv:1904.02180 [astro- ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [92]

    Science Opportunities of Wet Extreme Mass-Ratio In- spirals,

    Zhenwei Lyu, Zhen Pan, Junjie Mao, Ning Jiang, and Huan Yang, “Science Opportunities of Wet Extreme Mass-Ratio In- spirals,” (2024), arXiv:2501.03252 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  82. [93]

    Spin Evolution of Stellar-mass Black Holes Em- bedded in AGN Disks: Orbital Eccentricity Produces Retro- grade Circumstellar Flows,

    Ya-Ping Li, Yi-Xian Chen, Douglas N. C. Lin, and Zhuox- iao Wang, “Spin Evolution of Stellar-mass Black Holes Em- bedded in AGN Disks: Orbital Eccentricity Produces Retro- grade Circumstellar Flows,” Astrophys. J. Lett.928, L1 (2022), arXiv:2203.05539 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [94]

    Chaotic gas accretion by black holes embedded in AGN discs as cause of low-spin sig- natures in gravitational wave events,

    Yi-Xian Chen and Douglas N. C. Lin, “Chaotic gas accretion by black holes embedded in AGN discs as cause of low-spin sig- natures in gravitational wave events,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522, 319–329 (2023), arXiv:2303.17097 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.