Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Temperature-dependent radiative lifetime measurement of the $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$ state of sodium molecules

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports the first temperature-extrapolated measurement of the radiative lifetime of the $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$ state of Na2, obtaining $43.5\pm1.7$ ns at room temperature, in agreement with the computed $43.334$ ns from…

desk verdict Good Stern-Volmer data for a new Na2 rovibrational level, but the 43.5 ns room-temperature lifetime rests on a 300 K linear extrapolation that has no physical basis. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02691 v2 pith:SNT5MTBP submitted 2025-02-04 physics.atom-ph physics.atm-clusphysics.chem-phphysics.optics

Kshitiz Rai , Shakil Bin Kashem , Henry Pierce , Seth Ashman , S. Burcin Bayram This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.atm-clusphysics.chem-phphysics.optics
keywords radiativelifetimesodiumdimerStern-Volmerextrapolationdouble-resonancespectroscopytime-correlatedphotoncountingtemperaturedependence6^1Sigma_g^+statebound-freetransitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish the zero-collision radiative lifetime of a specific high-lying excited state of the sodium dimer, $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$. Because the measurement must be made in a hot vapor where sodium atoms and argon buffer gas collide with the molecules, the authors remove both collision effects in two steps: first extrapolating measured effective lifetimes to zero argon pressure at each temperature (Stern–Volmer plot), then extrapolating those argon-collision-free lifetimes from 593–653 K down to 293 K to subtract sodium-atom collisional quenching. The result is $43.5\pm1.7$ ns at room temperature, which matches the theoretical value $43.334$ ns computed from the sum of decay rates over all allowed electronic channels including bound-free transitions. If correct, this validates the transition-dipole and potential-curve calculations for this level and provides a benchmark for deriving transition dipole moments from experimental lifetimes.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on two consecutive extrapolations. The first is a Stern–Volmer plot, where the inverse effective lifetime is plotted against argon buffer-gas pressure and linearly fitted to zero pressure to remove argon collisions. The second is a linear fit of these zero-pressure lifetimes against cell temperature, extrapolated down to 293 K to remove sodium-atom collisional quenching. The theoretical comparison uses the LEVEL program for bound-bound Einstein A coefficients and the BCONT program for bound-free transition intensities, both fed by ab initio potential curves and transition dipole moments; the summed inverse decay rates give the predicted $43.334$ ns lifetime. A double-resonance excitation scheme through the intermediate $A^1\Sigma_u^+(10,30)$ level selects the target gerade state and suppresses background.

What would settle it

Directly measure the lifetime of the $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$ level at or near room temperature, for example in a molecular beam or cell where sodium vapor density is negligible so no temperature extrapolation is needed; if the directly measured value differs from $43.5\pm1.7$ ns by more than the combined experimental uncertainties, the linear temperature-extrapolation procedure is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the radiative lifetime of the ro-vibrational level $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$ of gas-phase Na2 is $43.5\pm1.7$ ns at room temperature. The authors measure effective lifetimes in an argon-buffered heatpipe at four temperatures between 593 K and 653 K, extrapolate each isotherm to zero argon pressure using the Stern–Volmer relationship, and then linearly extrapolate these argon-collision-free lifetimes as a function of temperature down to 293 K. The observed decrease of lifetime with temperature is attributed to collisions with sodium atoms, whose number density rises sharply over this range. The final value agrees with the theoretical lifetime of $43.334$ ns obtained from LEVEL and BCONT calculations that include both bound-bound and bound-free decays to seven electronic states; omitting bound-free transitions would raise the predicted lifetime to about 130 ns.

Load-bearing premise

The room-temperature lifetime is obtained by a linear fit to four measured points in the range 593–653 K and then extrapolating that line down to 293 K, which assumes the radiative lifetime is constant and that the temperature effect is entirely a linear collisional quenching rate with no change in mechanism or curvature over 300 K.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The measured lifetime of $43.5\pm1.7$ ns supports the theoretical value of $43.334$ ns that includes bound-free decay channels, implying that continuum transitions dominate the total decay rate of this state.
  • The agreement provides an experimental check on the ab initio potential curves and transition dipole moments used in the LEVEL and BCONT calculations for Na2.
  • The two-step Stern–Volmer plus temperature-extrapolation procedure offers a method for extracting zero-collision radiative lifetimes of other gerade states of alkali dimers measured in heatpipe ovens.
  • The lifetime value serves as a benchmark for deriving electronic transition dipole moments of the $6^1\Sigma_g^+$ state from experimental data.
  • For the $(v=9,J=31)$ level, this is the first reported room-temperature radiative lifetime obtained by temperature extrapolation, giving a reference point for cold-molecule experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linearity of the lifetime-versus-temperature fit is assumed without a physical model; re-analyzing the data using the temperature-dependent sodium vapor pressure and a computed quenching cross section could test whether the slope remains linear over the full 300 K extrapolation.
  • The same two-step extrapolation could be applied to the previously measured shorter-than-theory lifetimes of nearby vibrational levels, potentially resolving that discrepancy if their temperature dependence follows a similar linear pattern.
  • If an independent room-temperature measurement confirms the extrapolated value, the bound-free transition dipole moments used in the calculation would be validated for high-lying gerade states of alkali dimers, with implications for similar molecules.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved double-resonance lifetime measurements of the Na2 6^1Σ_g^+(v=9,J=31) level. Argon-pressure Stern-Volmer scans at four oven temperatures (593–653 K) yield argon-collision-free lifetimes between 27.2 and 23.9 ns. The authors extrapolate these four values linearly in temperature to 20 °C and obtain 43.5 ± 1.7 ns, which they compare with a calculated bound-bound plus bound-free lifetime of 43.334 ns quoted from a private communication. The central claim is the room-temperature radiative lifetime and its agreement with theory.

Significance. A reliable experimental radiative lifetime for this high-lying shelf state would be valuable for testing transition-dipole-moment calculations and for cold- and ultracold-molecule applications. The double-resonance excitation scheme and the Stern-Volmer pressure scans are appropriate, and the deposition of the data in a public repository is a strength. However, the room-temperature result is produced by an unsupported linear extrapolation, and the claimed agreement with theory is not established. The useful contribution of the paper, as written, is the temperature-dependent collision-affected lifetime data at 593–653 K, not the claimed zero-collision radiative lifetime at room temperature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 5] The central claim (43.5 ± 1.7 ns at 20 °C) is obtained by linearly extrapolating four argon-collision-free lifetimes (27.2, 26.3, 25.4, and 23.9 ns at 593–653 K) down to 293 K. The paper provides no physical justification for a linear τ(T) dependence. The text itself attributes the temperature effect to Na2*(v=9,J=31)–Na collisions; for that mechanism the appropriate form is 1/τ(T) = 1/τ_rad + k n_Na(T), which is strongly nonlinear over a range in which the sodium density changes by at least an order of magnitude and, per the numbers quoted in Section III, by a factor of about 500. If τ_rad were 43.5 ns, the quenching rate at 593 K would be 1/27.2 − 1/43.5 ≈ 0.0138 ns⁻¹; scaling this rate by the quoted density increase to 653 K gives a predicted lifetime far below the measured 23.9 ns. Fitting the same four points instead to 1/τ = 1/τ_rad + A n_Na(T) yields τ_rad in the range ≈27–28 ns, close to the measured high-temperature values and far from 43.5 ns. The reported agreement with 43.334 ns is therefore an artifact of the chosen linear fit function.
  2. [Section III] The sodium density numbers are internally inconsistent and lack units. The text states that the sodium atom number density increases from 1.3 × 10^7 at 593.15 K (320 °C) to 6.3 × 10^9 at 653.15 K (380 °C), but then states that the molecular density at 380 °C is 2.7 × 10^6 and calls the atomic density 'approximately on the order of three times higher.' The quoted values imply a ratio of roughly 2300, not 3, and the factor of about 485 between the two atomic densities is itself difficult to reconcile with the weak temperature dependence of the measured lifetimes under the proposed Na-quenching model. Without corrected densities and units, the quantitative analysis cannot be checked.
  3. [Section III and Ref. [31]] The theoretical comparison value 43.334 ns is taken from a private communication by co-author S. Ashman (Ref. [31]). Because the comparison target is neither peer-reviewed nor documented with a reproducible calculation or an uncertainty, the abstract's and conclusion's claims of 'excellent agreement' are not substantiated. The authors should either provide a complete, reproducible lifetime calculation with uncertainties or cite an independently published value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 and Section III] The y-axis label and Fig. 5 caption call the plotted quantities 'radiative lifetime'; as plotted they are argon-collision-free lifetimes that still contain Na-quenching contributions. Please relabel them as 'argon-collision-free lifetime' and reserve 'radiative lifetime' for the extrapolated value.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract says 'extrapolations to the zero buffer gas pressure, called Stern-Volmer plot'; please use the plural 'plots' and state that the plotted quantity is inverse lifetime versus argon pressure.
  3. [Throughout] The name of the fitting function is written inconsistently as 'Gausmod' and 'Gaussmod'; please use the software's proper name and verify the spelling.
  4. [References] Reference [1] appears to be incorrectly cited: the author name and journal citation 'Nature 20, 701 (2024)' do not match the standard review literature on cold and ultracold molecules; please verify and correct.
  5. [Figure captions] The arXiv rendering of the figure captions contains embedded font artifacts (e.g., '/s54/s49' sequences); these should be cleaned before publication so that the captions are readable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured value is independent of the theoretical comparison, though the theoretical number is a private communication by a co-author.

full rationale

The central result, 43.5 ± 1.7 ns, is derived from Stern-Volmer extrapolations to zero argon pressure at four temperatures, followed by a linear extrapolation of those four collision-free lifetimes to 20 C. Nothing in the paper makes this value equal to the theoretical 43.334 ns by construction; the theoretical value is not fed into the fits or used in the extrapolation. The only self-referential element is Ref [31], a private communication by co-author S. Ashman, which provides the theoretical lifetime used for the agreement claim. This is a self-citation and, because it is a private communication, it weakens the independent confirmation value of the comparison, but it is not load-bearing for the experiment itself: the measured lifetime would be the same if the theoretical value were deleted. The linear T-extrapolation is an empirical modeling assumption that could be physically wrong (a collisional model would instead suggest 1/tau depending on n_Na(T)), but that is a validity concern, not a circular reduction. No circular step can be exhibited with a specific equation or fit-to-prediction identity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claimed lifetime depends on two empirical fit parameters (slope and intercept of the τ vs T line) and on three domain assumptions: temperature-independent radiative lifetime, linear temperature dependence, and the Stern-Volmer model. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Slope of linear temperature fit (dτ/dT) = -0.055 ns/K (estimated from Fig. 5)
    A straight line is fitted to argon-collision-free lifetimes vs temperature in Fig. 5. The slope and intercept are used to extrapolate to 293 K. The linear model is empirical, with no derivation from collision kinetics.
  • Intercept of linear temperature fit (radiative lifetime at 20°C) = 43.5 ± 1.7 ns
    The extrapolated intercept is the central claimed result. Its reported uncertainty comes from the regression, not from the uncertainty in the model choice.
  • Gaussmod fit parameters (decay constant and Gaussian IRF width) = Not reported per run
    Each decay histogram is fitted with an exponentially modified Gaussian in Origin 2023. The fitted decay constant becomes the reported lifetime; the IRF width is fitted but no separate instrument response measurement is described.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The radiative lifetime of the 6^1Σ_g^+(v=9,J=31) level is independent of temperature; all observed temperature dependence arises from Na2*-Na collisional quenching.
    Invoked in Sec III to justify extrapolating to 293 K. No low-temperature or low-density measurement supports it.
  • domain assumption The argon-collision-free lifetime varies linearly with temperature over 593-653 K and continues linearly to 293 K.
    Used in the Fig. 5 linear fit. A kinetic model would predict an exponential dependence on Na density, so the linear form is an approximation without stated justification.
  • standard math The Stern-Volmer relation (1/τ_eff = 1/τ_0 + k_q p_Ar) holds for Ar quenching in the pressure range used.
    Standard bimolecular quenching model; used in Fig. 4 to extract argon-collision-free lifetimes.
  • standard math LEVEL and BCONT calculations with the cited potential curves and transition dipole moments give the correct radiative lifetime.
    The theoretical comparison relies on these standard programs. The inputs are from prior literature and a private communication.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Temperature-dependent radiative lifetime measurement of the $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$ state of sodium molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SNT5MTBP

@misc{pith2026250202691,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Temperature-dependent radiative lifetime measurement of the $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$ state of sodium molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SNT5MTBP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02691}
}
abstract

We report the measurement of radiative lifetimes of the $6^1\Sigma_g^+(v=9,J=31)$ state of gas-phase molecular sodium using a high-resolution double-resonance spectroscopy. Measurements were done using a time-correlated photon counting technique at various pressures and temperatures. Lifetimes were extracted from extrapolations to the zero buffer gas pressure, called Stern-Volmer plot, and the temperature-dependence of the radiative lifetimes were measured over a temperature range from 593 K to 653 K. Our result agrees well within the error limits with the theoretical calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02691 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. Two pul [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Na [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Comparison of experimentally observed fluorescence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Stern-Volmer plots at four different temperature set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The radiative lifetime of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Ashman, Providence College, Private Communication s (2024)

    S. Ashman, Providence College, Private Communication s (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Benini, Cold and ultracold molecules, Nature 20, 701 (2024)

    L. Benini, Cold and ultracold molecules, Nature 20, 701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    Brogi and M

    M. Brogi and M. Line, Retriving temperature and abundance s of exoplanet atmospheres with high-resolution cross-section spectroscopy, Astron. J. 157, 114 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    Crossfield, Observations of exoplanet atmospheres, P ub

    I. Crossfield, Observations of exoplanet atmospheres, P ub. Astro. Soc. Pac. 127, 941 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [4]

    Y. P. Varshni and R. C. Shukla, Alkali hydride molecules: Potential energy curves and the nature of their binding, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 130 (1963)

    work page 1963

  6. [5]

    J. J. Park, Y.-K. Lu, A. O. Jamison, T. V. Tscherbul, and W. Ketterle, A Feshbach resonance in collisions between triplet ground-state molecules, Nat ure 614, 54 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Tiemann, The potential barrier of the B 1Γ u state of Na 2, Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 5, 77 (1987)

    E. Tiemann, The potential barrier of the B 1Γ u state of Na 2, Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 5, 77 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [7]

    C. C. Tsai, T. J. Whang, J. T. Bahns, and W. C. Stwalley, The 3 1Σ + g “shelf” state of Na 2, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8480 (1993). 11

    work page 1993

Show all 52 references
  1. [8]

    Magnier, M

    S. Magnier, M. Aubert-Frécon, O. Bouty, F. Masnou-Seeuws , P. Millié, and V. N. Ostrovsky, Structures in the long range potential curves of the Na 2 molecule: Comparison between ab initio and asymptotic calculations, J. Phys. B 27, 1723 (1994)

    1994

  2. [9]

    C. C. Tsai, J. T. Bahns, H. Wang, T. J. Whang, and W. C. Stwall ey, Optical–optical dou- ble resonance spectroscopy of the 4 1Σ + g shelf state of Na 2 using an ultrasensitive ionization detector, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 25 (1994)

    1994

  3. [10]

    C. C. Tsai, J. T. Bahns, and W. C. Stwalley, Optical–optic al double resonance spec- troscopy of the 5 1Σ + g shelf state of Na 2 using an ultrasensitive ionization detector, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 768 (1994)

    1994

  4. [11]

    C. C. Tsai, J. T. Bahns, and W. C. Stwalley, Optical-optic al double resonance spec- troscopy of the 6 1Σ + g shelf state of Na 2 using an ultrasensitive ionization detector, J. Chem. Phys. 167, 429 (1994)

    1994

  5. [12]

    I. Y. Yurova, O. Dulieu, S. Magnier, F. Masnou-Seeuws, a nd V. N. Ostrovskii, Structures in the long-range potential curves of Na 2. II. Application to the semiclassical study of the energy pooling process between two excited sodium atoms, J. Phys. B 27, 3659 (1994)

    1994

  6. [13]

    P. Qi, J. Bai, E. Ahmed, A. M. Lyyra, S. Kotochigova, A. J. R oss, C. Effantin, P. Zal- icki, J. Vigué, G. Chawla, R. W. Field, T. J. Whang, W. C. Stwal ley, H. Knöckel, E. Tie- mann, J. Shang, L. Li, and T. Bergeman, New spectroscopic data , spin-orbit functions, and global an...

    2007 doi

  7. [14]

    Stwalley, Up and away in the potential landscape of di atomic molecule potential energy curves, J

    W. Stwalley, Up and away in the potential landscape of di atomic molecule potential energy curves, J. Mol. Spectros. 330, 14 (2016)

    2016

  8. [15]

    Demtröder, M

    W. Demtröder, M. McClintock, and R. N. Zare, Spectrosco py of Na 2 using laser-induced fluorescence, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 5495 (1969)

    1969

  9. [16]

    Demtröder and M

    W. Demtröder and M. Stock, Molecular constants and pote ntial curves of Na 2, from laser- induced fluorescence, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 55, 476 (1975)

    1975

  10. [17]

    Kusch and M

    P. Kusch and M. Hessel, Perturbations in the A 1Σ + u state of Na 2, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 4087 (1975)

    1975

  11. [18]

    R. H. Callender, J. I. Gersten, R. W. Leigh, and J. L. Yang , Laser-induced atomic fluorescence from Na 2, Phys. Rev. A 14, 1672 (1976)

    1976

  12. [19]

    Babaky and K

    O. Babaky and K. Hussein, The ground state X 1Σ + g of Na 2, Can. J. Phys. 67, 912 (1989). 12

    1989

  13. [20]

    H. K. Chung, K. Kirby, and J. F. Babb, Thoeretical study of the absorption spectra of the sodium dimer, Phys. Rev. A 63, 032516 (2001)

    2001

  14. [21]

    M. S. Kashem, M. Davies, L. Pant, and S. B. Bayram, Molecula r spectroscopy as a lab- oratory experiment: Measurement of important parameters o f sodium diatomic molecules, Am. J. Phys. 91, 1015 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    Baumgartner, W

    G. Baumgartner, W. Demtröder, and M. Stock, Lifetime-me asurements of alkali-molecules excited by different laserlines, Z. Phys. A 232, 462 (1970)

    1970

  16. [23]

    Ducas, M

    T. Ducas, M. Littman, M. Zimmerman, and D. Kleppner, Rad iative lifetimes of selected vi- brational levels in the A 1Σ u state of Na 2, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 842 (1976)

    1976

  17. [24]

    Demtröder, W

    W. Demtröder, W. Stetzenbach, M. Stock, and J. Witt, Lif etimes and Franck-Condon factors for the B1Π u → X 1Σ + g system of Na 2, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 61, 382 (1976)

    1976

  18. [25]

    Mehdizadeh, K

    E. Mehdizadeh, K. Ahmed, and W. Demtröder, Lifetimes, p opulations and deactivation mech- anisms of the C 1Π u, 2 3Π g and 2 1Σ + u states of Na 2, Appl. Phys. B 59, 509 (1994)

    1994

  19. [26]

    Anunciado, S

    R. Anunciado, S. Ashman, and L. Hüwel, Vibrationally re solved lifetime of the 2 1Σ + u state of Na2, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 174306 (2016)

    2016

  20. [27]

    Jayasundara, R

    N. Jayasundara, R. Anunciado, E. Burgess, S. Ashman, and L. Hüwel, Ro- vibrational level dependence of the radiative lifetime of t he Na 2 41Σ + g shelf state, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 064301 (2019)

    2019

  21. [28]

    Wagle, L

    D. Wagle, L. Pant, J. Converse, S. Wenner, Z. Saglam, and S. Bayram, Rovibrationally resolved radiative lifetime and collisional cross section measurem ents of the 61Σ + g (v=6,8,J= 31) state of molecular sodium, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 261, 107438 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    Sanli, B

    A. Sanli, B. Beser, J. Edwardson, S. Magnier, E. H. Ahmed, a nd A. Lyyra, Electronic tran- sition dipole moment and radiative lifetime calculations o f sodium dimer ion-pair states, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 104304 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    Saaranen, D

    M. Saaranen, D. Wagle, E. McLaughlin, A. Paladino, S. As hman, and S. Bayram, Time- resolved double-resonance spectroscopy: Lifetime measur ement of the 6 1Σ + g (7,31) electronic state of molecular sodium, J. Chem. Phys. 149, 204302 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Vidal and J

    C. Vidal and J. Cooper, Heat-pipe oven: A new, well-defin ed metal vapor device for spectro- scopic measurements, J. App. Phys. 40, 3370 (1969). 13

    1969

  25. [33]

    Vidal and F

    C. Vidal and F. Haller, Heat-pipe oven applications. i. isothermal heater of well defined tem- perature. II. production of metal vapor-gas mixtures, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 42, 1779 (1971)

    1971

  26. [34]

    Nesmeyanov, Vapor pressure of the elements (Academic Press, 1963)

    A. Nesmeyanov, Vapor pressure of the elements (Academic Press, 1963)

    1963

  27. [35]

    LeRoy, LEVEL: A computer program for solving the radi al Schrödinger equation for bound and quasibound levels, J

    R. LeRoy, LEVEL: A computer program for solving the radi al Schrödinger equation for bound and quasibound levels, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf er 186, 167 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    M. G. Littman and H. J. Metcalf, Spectrally narrow pulse d dye laser without beam expander, Appl. Opt. 17, 2224 (1978)

    1978

  29. [37]

    Magnier, P

    S. Magnier, P. Millie, O. Dulieu, and F. Masnou-Seeuws, Potential curves for the ground and excited states of the Na 2 molecule up to the (3s+5p) dissociation limit: Results of tw o different effective potential calculations, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7113 (1993)

    1993

  30. [38]

    P. F. Bernath, Spectra of atoms and molecules (Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Atkins and J

    P. Atkins and J. De Paula, Elements of physical chemistry (Oxford University Press, USA, 2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure-I

    G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure-I. Spectra of Di atomic Molecules (D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1950)

    1950

  33. [41]

    Duck and E

    I. Duck and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Toward an understanding o f the spin-statistics theorem, Am. J. Phys. 66, 284 (1998)

    1998

  34. [42]

    Radzig and B

    A. Radzig and B. Smirnov, Reference Data on Atoms, Molecules, and Ions (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985)

    1985

  35. [43]

    Stern and M

    O. Stern and M. Volmer, Über die abklingungszeit der fluo reszenz (The extinction period of fluorescence), Physik. Zeitschr. 20, 183 (1919)

    1919

  36. [44]

    Baumgartner, H

    G. Baumgartner, H. Kornmeier, and W. Preuss, Time spectr oscopy in the a1Σ + u states of Li 2 and Na 2. Lifetimes and electronic dipole moment of the A − X transition, Chem. Phys. Lett. 107, 13 (1984)

    1984

  37. [45]

    Na2-TemperatureDependent-Li fetime-Measurements

    S. B. Bayram, Dataset for "Na2-TemperatureDependent-Li fetime-Measurements", Harvard Dataverse, V1, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/72QECB (2025)

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    R. J. Le Roy and G. T. Kraemer, BCONT 2.2: A computer progra m for calculating bound- continuum transition intensities for diatomic molecules, Chemical Physics Research Report CP-650R2 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    Tiemann, H

    E. Tiemann, H. Knöckel, and H. Richling, Long-range int eraction at the asymptote 3s+3 of Na2, Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 37, 323 (1996). 14

    1996

  40. [48]

    Camacho, A

    J. Camacho, A. Pardo, and J. Poyato, A study of the B 1Π u → X 1Σ + g system of Na 2, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, 1935 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    Grochola, W

    A. Grochola, W. Jastrzębski, and P. Kowalczyk, The C 1Π u state of Na 2 re- visited: A comprehensive study by polarization labeling sp ectroscopy technique, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 232, 291 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    Grochola, W

    A. Grochola, W. Jastrzębski, and P. Kowalczyk, New anal ysis of the D(4) 1Π u state of Na 2 using polarization labelling spectroscopy, Mol. Phys. 104, 2569 (2006)

    2006

  43. [51]

    Pashov, W

    A. Pashov, W. Jastrzębski, W. Jasniecki, V. Bednarska, a nd P. Kowalczyk, Accurate potential curve for the double minimum 2 1Σ + u state of Na 2, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 203, 264 (2000)

    2000

  44. [52]

    Grochola, P

    A. Grochola, P. Kowalczyk, W. Jastrzębski, and P. Pasho v, A regularized inverted perturbation approach method: Potential energy curve of th e 4 1Σ + u state in Na 2, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 5754 (2004). 15

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.