Multidisciplinary Science in the Multimessenger Era

Aaron C. Trigg; Aimee Hungerford; Alejandro C\'ardenas-Avenda\~no; Amy Gall; Andrea Richard; Anna Y. Q. Ho; Athina Meli; Bindu Rani; Bronson Messer; Carolyn Kuranz

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Multidisciplinary Science in the Multimessenger Era

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Time-domain and multimessenger astrophysics will only reach its potential through end-to-end, chained simulations that cross disciplines and agencies.

desk verdict A useful and well-organized community white paper whose central programmatic claim—that TDAMM needs an NNSA-style end-to-end approach and can be done mostly by aligning existing programs—is coherent but under-supported on cost and coordination. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03577 v3 pith:U7MCHAD6 submitted 2025-02-05 astro-ph.HE gr-qcnucl-exnucl-thphysics.atom-ph

Eric Burns , Christopher L. Fryer , Ivan Agullo , Jennifer Andrews , Elias Aydi , Matthew G. Baring , Eddie Baron , Peter G. Boorman

show 77 more authors

Mohammad Ali Boroumand Eric Borowski Floor S. Broekgaarden Poonam Chandra Emmanouil Chatzopoulos Hsin-Yu Chen Kelly A. Chipps Francesca Civano Luca Comisso Alejandro Cárdenas-Avendaño Phong Dang Catherine M. Deibel Tarraneh Eftekhari Courey Elliott Ryan J. Foley Christopher J. Fontes Amy Gall Gwendolyn R. Galleher Gabriela Gonzalez Fan Guo Maria C. Babiuc Hamilton J. Patrick Harding Joseph Henning Falk Herwig William Raphael Hix Anna Y. Q. Ho Kelly Holley-Bockelmann Rebekah Hounsell C. Michelle Hui Thomas Brian Humensky Aimee Hungerford Robert I. Hynes Weidong Jin Heather Johns Maria Gatu Johnson Jamie A. Kennea Carolyn Kuranz Gavin P. Lamb Kristina D. Launey Tiffany R. Lewis Ioannis Liodakis Daniel Livescu Stuart Loch Nicholas R. MacDonald Thomas Maccarone Lea Marcotulli Athina Meli Bronson Messer M. Coleman Miller Valarie Milton Elias R. Most Darin C. Mumma Matthew R. Mumpower Michela Negro Eliza Neights Peter Nugent Dheeraj R Pasham David Radice Bindu Rani Jocelyn S. Read Rene Reifarth Emily Reily Lauren Rhodes Andrea Richard Paul M. Ricker Christopher J. Roberts Hendrik Schatz Peter Shawhan Endre Takacs John A. Tomsick Aaron C. Trigg Todd Urbatsch Nicole Vassh V. Ashley Villar Zorawar Wadiasingh Gaurav Waratkar Michael Zingale

This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HEgr-qcnucl-exnucl-thphysics.atom-ph

keywords time-domainastronomymultimessengerastrophysicsmultidisciplinaryscienceend-to-endmodelingexplosivetransientsnuclearuncertaintyquantificationpolicy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the next leap in understanding explosive cosmic events will not come from any single telescope, detector, or theory group, but from end-to-end modeling that chains simulations across several branches of physics. Time-domain and multimessenger astrophysics—the study of how sources vary over time and what gravitational waves, neutrinos, and light say about them—has reached the point where observational data outgrow the approximate models astronomy traditionally uses. The authors contend that the same management approach used to solve complex nuclear-security problems, spelling out every step and chaining simulations so each output feeds the next, should be applied to sources such as supernovae, novae, and neutron-star mergers. They conclude that no single discipline, facility, or agency can do this alone, and that most of the needed investment could come from aligning existing programs rather than new money.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the chained-simulation, end-to-end workflow: break a problem into stages, build or adapt a simulation for each stage, connect them so the output of one becomes the input of the next, and use uncertainty quantification to find and fix the weakest link. The paper illustrates this with core-collapse supernovae, whose understanding requires linking progenitor evolution, collapse, shock breakout, photospheric emission, nebular phase, and remnant formation—each stage drawing on a different discipline and a different set of observing facilities. A second supporting mechanism is sustained community organization, modeled on the nuclear-astrophysics center structure, which builds curated cross-disciplinary data resources and trains generalist scientists.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to run a well-observed transient, such as a nearby binary neutron-star merger, through two parallel efforts—an integrated chained-simulation team spanning all relevant disciplines and independent discipline-by-discipline teams—and see whether the chained approach yields measurably tighter and more accurate predictions of the observed light curves, spectra, and multimessenger signals.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that progress in the physics of the cosmos is now limited less by data than by integration. Approximate single-physics models, long adequate for astronomy, cannot interpret the combined gravitational-wave, neutrino, and multiwavelength observations that new facilities are producing. The paper's proposed remedy is to treat each major source—especially explosive transients—as a chain of simulation stages, from progenitor to remnant, with the output of each stage feeding the next and with uncertainties tracked and reduced at the weakest link. This is presented as a transferable method rather than a new instrument: the hard part is organizational, and the majority of the required work is aligning knowledge and codes that already exist.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an end-to-end management model built for a single mission-driven agency can be transplanted into open academic science by aligning existing funding programs, without major new money, and that researchers will cooperate despite the incentive structure the paper itself describes as rewarding competition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Explosive transients—supernovae, novae, and neutron-star mergers—will be the first sources to reach full end-to-end modeling, because their community links and data resources are most mature.
Joint community observing plans with immediate public data would replace competing proprietary proposals for rare events, improving the chance that rare transients are fully characterized.
Investment in atomic data and non-equilibrium (non-LTE) modeling would unlock heavy-element identifications in kilonovae and expand the scientific return of major infrared and X-ray missions.
The approach implies funding mechanisms that deliberately span physics and astronomy, not just larger grants within existing single-discipline programs.
If the method works, it would also create a pipeline of generalist scientists with the multiphysics and computational skills needed outside academia.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: the paper's claim that most of the needed investment can come from aligning existing programs is untested; if agency incentives cannot be aligned, the real recommendation would become a request for a large new interagency budget, a scenario the paper does not price.
Editorial extension: the success story the paper relies on is two decades of funded community organization in nuclear astrophysics, which suggests the transferable unit is the center, not just the simulation chain; other fields would likely need a similar decade-long investment before end-to-end modeling could begin.
Editorial extension: the paper's logic implies a measurable definition of progress—convergence among independent codes on the same transient—so a near-term test would be whether chained interdisciplinary models shrink the order-of-magnitude disagreements seen in current kilonova light-curve calculations.
Editorial extension: the same end-to-end logic could eventually be applied to jetted sources such as active galactic nuclei and gamma-ray bursts; the paper says these have similar promise but need more mature plasma-physics communities first.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a workshop white paper, not a research result, so review it on its own terms: as a synthesis and a programmatic argument. Read that way, it is actually useful. The overview of the relevant disciplines and source classes is broad but well organized, and the paper does a fair job of citing the existing strategic landscape (Astro 2020, P5, the nuclear LRP, prior TDAMM reports). The genuinely new content is a handful of concrete proposals: the end-to-end chain for core-collapse supernovae, community-driven observing plans, authorship/referencing reforms, an atomic-data analog of REACLib, and a narrow-field gamma-ray spectropolarimeter. Those are specific enough to argue about, which is more than most white papers offer.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points. The executive summary and §1.2 rest the whole recommendation on the claim that an NNSA-style end-to-end approach is necessary and that 'the majority of the needed investment can be done through alignment of existing programs, without requiring additional funds.' That second premise is doing real feasibility work, but it is never quantified. NNSA operates under single-agency authority with a ~$24B budget; open TDAMM science is split across NSF, NASA, and DOE with different statutory mandates and PI-driven incentives. The paper itself concedes in §1.3.4 that the incentive structure is a Nash equilibrium and that coordination has not happened despite the 2003 NRC recommendation. Those admissions make the no-new-funds claim less, not more, credible. The later asks—larger TCANs, a NASA CAREER award, strategic atomic-spectroscopy support—also imply new resources without reconciliation. If the alignment premise fails, the central recommendation silently becomes a call for new large-scale funding.

There are also a couple of minor overclaims: §1.1.2 says DESI's ~3σ evidence, if confirmed, 'would falsify both ΛCDM and General Relativity.' That is too strong. The Hubble-tension discussion is more carefully caveated ('If true'), but still frames a >5σ measurement disagreement as falsification of ΛCDM without engaging the modeling uncertainties. These are small blemishes in a long document, not fatal.

Who should read this? Program officers, early-career researchers wanting a map of the field, and anyone drafting a proposal that touches TDAMM. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject, but the referee should push hard on the cost and coordination analysis. I would not cite it as a scientific result, but I might cite it as a statement of community priorities. Bring it to a reading group only if people are interested in science-policy arguments; it is not a technical paper.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This white paper, produced from the 3rd TDAMM Workshop, argues that progress in time-domain and multimessenger (TDAMM) astrophysics requires an integrated, end-to-end modeling approach analogous to that used by the NNSA, spanning simulations, experiments, and observations across NASA, NSF, and DOE. It reviews six science goals (origin of the elements, cosmology, extreme matter, black-hole energy extraction, QED photon splitting, and out-of-equilibrium physics), surveys ten relevant disciplines and eleven source classes, and makes recommendations on observing plans, incentives, authorship, data curation, community organization, workforce development, and funding. The central claims are that a true end-to-end approach is beyond any individual discipline, facility, or agency, and that most of the needed investment can be achieved by aligning existing programs without requiring additional funds.

Significance. If the central thesis is accepted, the paper provides a useful framework for interagency coordination and a concrete prioritization of explosive transients as the source class most ready for end-to-end treatment. Its strengths are the breadth of synthesis, the explicit chain-of-simulations example for core-collapse supernovae, the identification of specific gaps (atomic spectroscopy, a high-energy transient monitor, rapid X-ray response), and the documentation of the JINA/CeNAM model as a successful community-organization template. The paper is not a derivation-based research article; its value lies in synthesis and policy recommendations. However, the feasibility argument is not quantitative: the no-new-funds claim is asserted rather than demonstrated, and several specific recommendations imply additional resources. The paper would be significantly strengthened by a budget/coordination gap analysis or an explicit revision of the funding claim.

major comments (2)

[Executive Summary and §1.2] The feasibility of the central recommendation rests on the claim that "the majority of the needed investment can be done through alignment of existing programs, without requiring additional funds." This claim is load-bearing but unsupported. The paper's only evidence is the NNSA heuristic that about 95% of required effort is aligning existing components and 5% is new work, but this heuristic is asserted, not derived, and it is applied without accounting for the structural differences between NNSA (single-agency authority, ~$24B mission budget) and open TDAMM science split across NSF, NASA, and DOE with separate statutory mandates and PI-driven incentives that the paper itself describes in §1.3.4. The paper's own recommendations contradict the no-new-funds claim: §1.3.2 asks for "equivalent, and preferably enhanced, funding" for community-driven observing plans; §1.3.11 asks for larger TCANs, a NASA CAREER award, and bolstered NASA theory budgets; and §1.3.12 lists new facility needs. Please either provide a budget/coordination gap analysis with an inventory of realignable programs, or revise the claim to acknowledge that meaningful new investment is required. This is not a wording issue; if the claim is false, the central recommendation silently becomes a call for substantial new funding.
[§1.2] The claim that "a true end-to-end approach is needed for transformational understanding" is presented as a finding rather than an argued conclusion. The core-collapse supernova chain example illustrates what an integrated modeling chain would look like, but it does not establish that this is the only route to transformational understanding, and the paper's admission later in §1.2 that "the best facilities to build or the best observing plans to follow... cannot be known with certainty" until the integrated work is done creates a circularity that is not resolved. Since this is the paper's central thesis, please provide a more systematic argument for why existing PI-driven or discipline-specific approaches are insufficient, and clarify how the community should prioritize investments while the end-to-end chains are still under construction.

minor comments (4)

[§1.1.2] The statement that confirmation of the DESI dark-energy evidence "would falsify both ΛCDM and General Relativity" is a scientific overstatement: it would falsify ΛCDM, but evolving dark energy can be accommodated by dynamical dark-energy models within general relativity; falsifying GR itself would require model-specific tests. Please qualify or correct this sentence.
[Global] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and formatting issues, including "hysicsrofessional," "T able," "W orkshop," "F ourth," "F an Guo," and the incomplete phrase "rad transport calculations" in §1 Synthesis. A careful proofreading pass is needed before publication.
[§1.3.11] The phrase "a single SciDAC or PFC exceeds the total budget of TCAN" is used to motivate larger TCANs, but no program budgets are cited. Adding a source or a footnote would make the comparison verifiable and would strengthen the recommendation.
[§1.3.12] The sentence "Though if hundreds of millions of dollars does come available, we'd love to be the ones to spend it" is informal and, more importantly, undercuts the paper's no-new-funds message. Consider removing it or replacing it with a substantive statement about how additional resources would be prioritized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: this white paper makes an analogy-based funding recommendation, not a fitted prediction or derived result

full rationale

The paper contains no equations, fits, or derived predictions that could reduce to their own inputs. Its central claim, 'A true end-to-end approach is needed for transformational understanding in the physics of the cosmos through TDAMM science' (Section 1.2), is an argued recommendation supported by analogy to NNSA practice and by Decadal priorities, not a result computed from the paper's own assumptions. The Executive Summary's assertion that 'the majority of the needed investment can be done through alignment of existing programs, without requiring additional funds' is an unsupported empirical premise, but that is a weakness in evidence and cost analysis, not circularity. The only self-referential element is advocacy: the authors find 'the TDAMM Workshop series to be particularly beneficial' (Section 1.3.9) and recommend continued investment in CeNAM, a program with substantial author overlap. This is institutional self-promotion and a potential conflict-of-interest, but it does not function as a load-bearing logical premise for any scientific claim. Section 1.3.5 notes a possible 'circular problem' in model development within the field; that is a substantive observation about a community bottleneck, not a circular step of this paper itself. No step reduces by construction to its inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear because the paper is a qualitative roadmap. The axioms listed are the background assumptions that must hold for the central recommendation to be sensible.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Astrophysical observations are now reaching the point where approximate physics models are insufficient.
Invoked in the Preface and Executive Summary to justify the need for higher-fidelity end-to-end models; if approximate models remained adequate, the paper's main recommendation would lose its motivation.
domain assumption The NNSA end-to-end approach is an appropriate template for open academic astrophysics.
Section 1.2 presents NNSA as the model to emulate; the paper does not demonstrate transferability across agencies with different incentive structures and no single-entity authority.
domain assumption The Astro 2020 Decadal's TDAMM priority is accepted as a correct starting point.
The paper builds all of its science prioritization (Section 1.5) on the Decadal's 'New Windows on the Dynamic Universe' recommendation without independently justifying the choice.
domain assumption The success of the JINA/CeNAM community organization model is representative and scalable.
Section 1.3.7 generalizes from this single nuclear astrophysics case to other disciplines such as atomic physics and plasma physics; a single positive case is weak inductive evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multidisciplinary Science in the Multimessenger Era." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U7MCHAD6

@misc{pith2026250203577,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multidisciplinary Science in the Multimessenger Era},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U7MCHAD6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03577}
}

read the original abstract

Astrophysical observations of the cosmos allow us to probe extreme physics and answer foundational questions on our universe. Modern astronomy is increasingly operating under a holistic approach, probing the same question with multiple diagnostics including how sources vary over time, how they appear across the electromagnetic spectrum, and through their other signatures, including gravitational waves, neutrinos, cosmic rays, and dust on Earth. Astrophysical observations are now reaching the point where approximate physics models are insufficient. Key sources of interest are explosive transients, whose understanding requires multidisciplinary studies at the intersection of astrophysics, gravity, nuclear science, plasma physics, fluid dynamics and turbulence, computation, particle physics, atomic, molecular, and optical science, condensed matter and materials science, radiation transport, and high energy density physics. This white paper provides an overview of the major scientific advances that lay at the intersection of physics and astronomy and are best probed through time-domain and multimessenger astrophysics, an exploration of how multidisciplinary science can be fostered, and introductory descriptions of the relevant scientific disciplines and key astrophysical sources of interest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03577 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Pair cascades over a range of magnetic field strengths and orientations (parallel or perpendicular). Straight lines are electrons and positrons, with photons as wavy lines. Borrowed from Baring & Harding (2001a) The second is astrophysical soft gamma-ray observations of magnetars, which are neutron stars with magnetic fields up to around 1015 G, being well in excess of the quantum critical field of 4.4 × 1013 G wher… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Reach of ground-based gravitational-wave observations of merger transients. Triangles mark events recorded before O4, which started in 2023. O5, A#, and CE40 represent planned and nominal detector upgrades from the next few years until ∼2040. Figure from (Evans et al. 2023). • What is the nature of matter under extreme conditions? The cold neutron-star equation of state, up to 5-6 times nuclear density, imprints on … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Schematic delineation on the chart of nuclides of the nuclear reaction sequences that power cosmic events and/or are responsible for the synthesis of the elements. Most of the reaction sequences involve unstable nuclei (stable nuclei are black) and most are related to TDAMM sites such as neutron star mergers (r-process), supernovae (r-process, weak r-process, n-process, p-process, νp-process), novae (rp-process), an… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (16 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Table and chart showing the number of spectral transitions in the NIST ASD database (ASD Kramida et al. 2024). Of particular note are the large number of charge states relevant for TDAMM that have no or only a small number of transitions in the database. Atomic Spectra…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The first JWST late-time infrared spectrum of a kilonova (Levan et al. 2024); figure from NASA, ESA, CSA, Joseph Olmsted (STScI). A line complex is evident, which was also seen in the kilonova following the multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star merger in 20…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Image of the Space Simulator, first commodity machine in the top 100 of the top 500 list (Warren et al. 2003) and a slice of the 3-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulation it was designed to model (Fryer & Warren 2002). Since the rise in computing in the 1940s, c…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Comparison of 3 codes studying the implosion of a shell. Although designed to test instabilities in the implosion of a National Ignition Facility capsule for Inertial Confinement Fusion, the physics is relevant to understand the growth of convective instabilities in a …

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: A montage of radiation flow studies. From top left moving clockwise: radishock experiment (Coffing et al. 2024), supernova blastwave through a clumpy medium (Fryer et al. 2020) and simulations and experimental design for an experiment studying radiation flow through an…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Schematic denoting the approximate size scales associated with the key physical regions pertaining to this white paper (Created by P. Boorman). Other systems / events can provide a smaller-size shorter-time scale AGN analog. For example, in the X-ray binary community, …

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Advanced nuclear burning in massive stars. They lie in cocentric layers with lighter elements farther away from the core. However, simulations show that the shock generally stalls in the outer core, losing energy to neutrino radiation and nuclear dissociation. After c…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: The temporal stages of relevance for CCSN. These are the stellar progenitor, collapse and explosion, the shock propagation and breakout, the photospheric phase, the nebular phase, and lastly as supernova remnants. Pre-solar grains are generated in the later phases and…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Post explosion supernova ejecta CSM interaction creates a forward shock moving in the CSM and a reverse shock in the ejecta, separated by contact discontinuity. The interaction results in variety of emission. alone are insufficient, radiation-hydrodynamics calculation…

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: A summary of the transient activity of magnetars, borrowed from Negro et al. (2024) Comment: Magnetars are among the most extreme objects in the universe. Their properties and emission involve particularly rare processes. They present a unique but complex opportunity …

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: The afterglow of a structured jet, including a cocoon component, and a two-component kilonova. Solid lines indicate the combined lightcurves at u- and i-bands for observers at 0.0, 15.0, and 30.0 degrees from the jet central axis. No bright GRB is expected for the two…

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: A representation of the simulation and modeling required to understand thermonuclear supernovae. The integrated loop contains the various stages of these events. In between each step are shown the relevant measurements, observables, and knowledge required to integrate…

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: A summary of the processes and stages involve in a tidal disruption event Komossa (2015) Finally, TDEs may serve as natural sites for neutrino production via charged pion decay of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs; Dai & Fang 2017; Hayasaki & Yamazaki 2019). Jetted…

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: An artist’s annotated depiction of a low-mass X-ray binary (Image credit: Robert Hynes). to perform. Nonetheless, the prediction of infinities in the theory, and its lack of formulation with quantum principles, convinces most physicists that general relativity is only…

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: A representation of the structure and emissions from GRBs. A central engine powers relativistic jets in two directions. These outflows release the prompt gamma-ray signature. This is followed by an external shock generated as the jet propagates through the surrounding…

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: A fast radio burst, borrowed from Lorimer et al. (2007). The main image shows the direct frequency evolution, with the decay due to dispersion by astrophysical plasmas. The inset shows the de-dispersed signature. Prevailing theories for FRB sources implicate magnetars…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

4th TDAMM Workshop White Paper
astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A community white paper arguing TDAMM science is becoming follow-up-limited, and proposing pre-negotiated community observing plans with infrastructure, policy, and capability recommendations.
The Heavy Element Enrichment History of the Universe from Neutron Star Mergers with Habitable Worlds Observatory
astro-ph.HE 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

A whitepaper arguing that HWO, with rapid, deep UV-optical-IR follow-up of gravitational-wave-detected neutron star mergers, could map the cosmic history of r-process enrichment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.co...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t...
[3]

I-process Nucleosynthesis and Mass Retention Efficiency in He-shell Flash Evolution of Rapidly Accreting White Dwarfs

thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

arXiv 2016
[4]

G., Abbott , R., Abouelfettouh , I., et al

Abac , A. G., Abbott , R., Abouelfettouh , I., et al. 2024, , 970, L34

2024
[5]

P., et al

Abbott, B. P., et al. 2017, , 119, 161101

2017
[6]

P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T

Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2017, , 848, L12

2017
[7]

2020, , 247, 33

Abdollahi , S., Acero , F., Ackermann , M., et al. 2020, , 247, 33

2020
[8]

U., Albert , A., Alfaro , R., et al

Abeysekara , A. U., Albert , A., Alfaro , R., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 911

2017

Show all 300 references

[9]

A., Chen , X., Kato , S., Lasota , J.-P., & Regev , O

Abramowicz , M. A., Chen , X., Kato , S., Lasota , J.-P., & Regev , O. 1995, , 438, L37

1995
[10]

A., Abi, B., Acciarri, R., et al

Abud, A. A., Abi, B., Acciarri, R., et al. 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06100

2022
[11]

2024, , 627, 281

Abuter , R., Allouche , F., Amorim , A., et al. 2024, , 627, 281

2024
[12]

2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03002

Adame, A., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03002

2024 arXiv
[13]

2021, Physical review letters, 126, 172502

Adhikari, D., Albataineh, H., Androic, D., et al. 2021, Physical review letters, 126, 172502

2021
[14]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.18334

Adhikari , S., Pe \ n il , P., Dom \' nguez , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.18334

2024 arXiv
[15]

Adler , S. L. 1971, Annals of Physics, 67, 599

1971
[16]

M., et al

Agazie , G., Anumarlapudi , A., Archibald , A. M., et al. 2023, , 951, L8

2023
[17]

2024, in EAS2024, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 2260

Agudo , I. 2024, in EAS2024, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 2260

2024
[18]

X., B., et al

Aharonian , F., An , Q., Axikegu , L. X., B., et al. 2021, , 126, 241103

2021
[19]

2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02063

Ahumada, T., Andrews, J., Antier, S., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02063

2024 arXiv
[20]

2023, A New Era Of Discovery: The 2023 Long-Range Plan For Nuclear Science, Tech

Aidala, C., Aprahamian, A., Bedaque, P., et al. 2023, A New Era Of Discovery: The 2023 Long-Range Plan For Nuclear Science, Tech. rep., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

2023
[21]

2023, , 954, L49

Ajello , M., Murase , K., & McDaniel , A. 2023, , 954, L49

2023
[22]

2020, , 892, 105

Ajello , M., Angioni , R., Axelsson , M., et al. 2020, , 892, 105

2020
[23]

2022, , 263, 24

Ajello , M., Baldini , L., Ballet , J., et al. 2022, , 263, 24

2022
[24]

C., et al

Albert , A., Alfaro , R., Arteaga-Vel \'a zquez , J. C., et al. 2023, , 944, L29

2023
[25]

2022, Frontiers in Physics, 10, doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.942726

Aliotta, M., & Langanke, K. 2022, Frontiers in Physics, 10, doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.942726. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.942726

2022
[26]

An , H., & Romani , R. W. 2020, , 904, 27

2020
[27]

H., Jermyn , A

Anders , E. H., Jermyn , A. S., Lecoanet , D., & Brown , B. P. 2022, , 926, 169

2022
[28]

C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al

Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 947, 83

2023
[29]

2020, , 491, 972

Andrassy , R., Herwig , F., Woodward , P., & Ritter , C. 2020, , 491, 972

2020
[30]

2022, , 659, A193

Andrassy , R., Higl , J., Mao , H., et al. 2022, , 659, A193

2022
[31]

W., Kool , E

Andreoni , I., Coughlin , M. W., Kool , E. C., et al. 2021, , 918, 63

2021
[32]

W., Perley , D

Andreoni , I., Coughlin , M. W., Perley , D. A., et al. 2022, , 612, 430

2022
[33]

2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04793

Andreoni, I., Margutti, R., Banovetz, J., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04793

2024 arXiv
[34]

R., Woosley , S

Angus , C. R., Woosley , S. E., Foley , R. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.02174

2024 arXiv
[35]

A., Kasen , D., et al

Arcavi , I., Howell , D. A., Kasen , D., et al. 2017, , 551, 210

2017
[36]

2021, , 592, 704

Arcodia , R., Merloni , A., Nandra , K., et al. 2021, , 592, 704

2021
[37]

2024 a , , 684, A64

Arcodia , R., Liu , Z., Merloni , A., et al. 2024 a , , 684, A64

2024
[38]

2024 b , , 684, A64

---. 2024 b , , 684, A64

2024
[39]

2023, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 31, 1

Arcones, A., & Thielemann, F.-K. 2023, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 31, 1

2023
[40]

D., Meakin , C., Hirschi , R., et al

Arnett , W. D., Meakin , C., Hirschi , R., et al. 2019, , 882, 18

2019
[41]

F., Swisdak , M., et al

Arnold , H., Drake , J. F., Swisdak , M., et al. 2021 a , , 126, 135101

2021
[42]

2021 b , , 126, 135101

---. 2021 b , , 126, 135101

2021
[43]

D., Simon , P., Bilbao , P

Arrowsmith , C. D., Simon , P., Bilbao , P. J., et al. 2024, Nature Communications, 15, 5029

2024
[44]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.19176

Asai , S., Ballarino , A., Bose , T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.19176

2024 arXiv
[45]

B., Abdo , A

Atwood , W. B., Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., et al. 2009, , 697, 1071

2009
[46]

2020, A Community Plan for Fusion Energy and Discovery Plasma Sciences, , , arXiv:2011.04806

Baalrud, S., Ferraro, N., Garrison, L., et al. 2020, A Community Plan for Fusion Energy and Discovery Plasma Sciences, , , arXiv:2011.04806. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04806

2020 arXiv
[47]

2010, Report of the Workshop on Opportunities in Plasma Astrophysics, arXiv:2203.02406

Bale , S., Bhattacharjee , A., Cattaneo , F., et al. 2010, Report of the Workshop on Opportunities in Plasma Astrophysics, arXiv:2203.02406

2010 arXiv
[48]

H., Lott , B., & The Fermi-LAT collaboration

Ballet , J., Bruel , P., Burnett , T. H., Lott , B., & The Fermi-LAT collaboration . 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.12546

2023 arXiv
[49]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07236

Banados , E., Momjian , E., Connor , T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07236

2024 arXiv
[50]

G., & Harding , A

Baring , M. G., & Harding , A. K. 2001 a , , 547, 929

2001
[51]

2001 b , , 547, 929

---. 2001 b , , 547, 929

2001
[52]

2007, , 308, 109

---. 2007, , 308, 109

2007
[53]

1967, , 18, 379

Barkat , Z., Rakavy , G., & Sack , N. 1967, , 18, 379

1967
[54]

2005, , 356, 1029

Baskin , A., & Laor , A. 2005, , 356, 1029

2005
[55]

1969, Nature, 224, 673

Baym, G., Pethick, C., & Pines, D. 1969, Nature, 224, 673

1969
[56]

C., McKee , C

Begelman , M. C., McKee , C. F., & Shields , G. A. 1983, , 271, 70

1983
[57]

Bell , A. R. 1978, , 182, 147

1978
[58]

2020, , 635, L7

Belladitta , S., Moretti , A., Caccianiga , A., et al. 2020, , 635, L7

2020
[59]

Beloborodov , A. M. 2020, , 896, 142

2020
[60]

2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 487, 1426

Beniamini, P., Hotokezaka, K., van der Horst, A., & Kouveliotou, C. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 487, 1426. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1391

2019 doi
[61]

2023, , 520, 1872

Beniamini , P., Wadiasingh , Z., Hare , J., et al. 2023, , 520, 1872

2023
[62]

Beniamini, P., Wadiasingh, Z., Trigg, A., et al. 2024, Extragalactic Magnetar Giant Flares: Population Implications, Rates and Prospects for Gamma-Rays, Gravitational Waves and Neutrinos, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:2411.16846. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16846

2024 arXiv
[63]

W., Deller , A

Bera , A., James , C. W., Deller , A. T., et al. 2024, , 969, L29

2024
[64]

2016, European Physical Journal A, 52, 72

Best , A., Caciolli , A., F \"u l \"o p , Z., et al. 2016, European Physical Journal A, 52, 72

2016
[65]

A., & Wilson , J

Bethe , H. A., & Wilson , J. R. 1985, , 295, 14

1985
[66]

C., Surman , R., & Hix , W

Beun , J., McLaughlin , G. C., Surman , R., & Hix , W. R. 2006, , 73, 093007

2006
[67]

1987, , 154, 1

Blandford , R., & Eichler , D. 1987, , 154, 1

1987
[68]

D., & McKee , C

Blandford , R. D., & McKee , C. F. 1982, , 255, 419

1982
[69]

D., & Ostriker, J

Blandford, R. D., & Ostriker, J. P. 1978, Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters to the Editor, vol. 221, Apr. 1, 1978, p. L29-L32., 221, L29

1978
[70]

D., & Znajek, R

Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. 1977, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 179, 433

1977
[71]

F., Satyapal , S., & Ellison , S

Blecha , L., Snyder , G. F., Satyapal , S., & Ellison , S. L. 2018, , 478, 3056

2018
[72]

P., et al

Blondin , S., Blinnikov , S., Callan , F. P., et al. 2022, , 668, A163

2022
[73]

S., Giannios , D., Metzger , B

Bloom , J. S., Giannios , D., Metzger , B. D., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 203

2011
[74]

2024, Universe, 10, 148

Boccioli , L., & Roberti , L. 2024, Universe, 10, 148

2024
[75]

D., Ravi , V., Belov , K

Bochenek , C. D., Ravi , V., Belov , K. V., et al. 2020, , 587, 59

2020
[76]

D., Ravi , V., & Dong , D

Bochenek , C. D., Ravi , V., & Dong , D. 2021, , 907, L31

2021
[77]

R., & Pines, D

Bohr, A., Mottelson, B. R., & Pines, D. 1958, Physical Review, 110, 936

1958
[78]

D., Leroy , A

Bolatto , A. D., Leroy , A. K., Levy , R. C., et al. 2021, , 923, 83

2021
[79]

G., Gandhi , P., Buchner , J., et al

Boorman , P. G., Gandhi , P., Buchner , J., et al. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.07339

2024
[80]

G., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Annuar , A., et al

Boorman , P. G., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Annuar , A., et al. 2024 b , Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1335459

2024
[81]

A., Morra, G., & Mora, P

Boroumand, M. A., Morra, G., & Mora, P. 2024, Journal of Applied Physics, 135

2024
[82]

2019, Galaxies, 7, 20

B \"o ttcher , M. 2019, Galaxies, 7, 20

2019
[83]

N., & Alexander , D

Brandt , W. N., & Alexander , D. M. 2015, , 23, 1

2015
[84]

2009, in astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Vol

Brickhouse , N., Cowan , J., Drake , P., et al. 2009, in astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Vol. 2010, P68

2009
[85]

J., Milam , S., et al

Brickhouse , N., Ferland , G. J., Milam , S., et al. 2020, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 52, 0202

2020
[86]

R., et al

Brightman , M., Masini , A., Ballantyne , D. R., et al. 2016, , 826, 93

2016
[87]

R., et al

Brightman , M., Balokovi \'c , M., Ballantyne , D. R., et al. 2017, , 844, 10

2017
[88]

C., Levan , A

Brown , G. C., Levan , A. J., Stanway , E. R., et al. 2015, , 452, 4297

2015
[89]

2014, , 564, A125

Buchner , J., Georgakakis , A., Nandra , K., et al. 2014, , 564, A125

2014
[90]

2015, , 802, 89

---. 2015, , 802, 89

2015
[91]

M., Burbidge, G

Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1957, Reviews of modern physics, 29, 547

1957
[92]

2020, Living Reviews in Relativity, 23, 4

Burns, E. 2020, Living Reviews in Relativity, 23, 4

2020
[93]

2021, , 907, L28

Burns , E., Svinkin , D., Hurley , K., et al. 2021, , 907, L28

2021
[94]

2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04485

Burns, E., Coughlin, M., Ackley, K., et al. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04485

2023 arXiv
[95]

N., Kennea , J

Burrows , D. N., Kennea , J. A., Ghisellini , G., et al. 2011, , 476, 421

2011
[96]

C., Fryxell , B., Plewa , T., et al

Calder , A. C., Fryxell , B., Plewa , T., et al. 2002, , 143, 201

2002
[97]

2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828

Caleb , M., Heywood , I., Rajwade , K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828

2022
[98]

L., et al

Caleb , M., Lenc , E., Kaplan , D. L., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1159

2024
[99]

2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 438, 3291

Camero, A., Papitto, A., Rea, N., et al. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 438, 3291. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2432

2014 doi
[100]

1957 a , The Astronomical Journal, 62, 9

Cameron, A. 1957 a , The Astronomical Journal, 62, 9

1957
[101]

Cameron, A. G. W. 1957 b , Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 69, 201

1957
[102]

P., & Ransom , S

Camilo , F., Reynolds , J., Johnston , S., Halpern , J. P., & Ransom , S. M. 2008, , 679, 681

2008
[103]

2007 a , The Astrophysical Journal, 659, L37

Camilo, F., Reynolds, J., Johnston, S., et al. 2007 a , The Astrophysical Journal, 659, L37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/516630

2007 doi
[104]

M., et al

Camilo, F., Cognard, I., Ransom, S. M., et al. 2007 b , The Astrophysical Journal, 663, 497. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/518226

2007 doi
[105]

2024, , 109, 015501

Carenza , P., Co' , G., Giannotti , M., et al. 2024, , 109, 015501

2024
[106]

2021, , 126, 071102

Carenza , P., Fore , B., Giannotti , M., Mirizzi , A., & Reddy , S. 2021, , 126, 071102

2021
[107]

J., stgaard , N., G \"o C \"u s , E., et al

Castro-Tirado , A. J., stgaard , N., G \"o C \"u s , E., et al. 2021, , 600, 621

2021
[108]

A., & Metzger, B

Cehula, J., Thompson, T. A., & Metzger, B. D. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528, 5323. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae358

2024 doi
[109]

D., et al

Cendes , Y., Berger , E., Alexander , K. D., et al. 2024, , 971, 185

2024
[110]

B., Krimm , H

Cenko , S. B., Krimm , H. A., Horesh , A., et al. 2012, , 753, 77

2012
[111]

B., Paris , M

Chadwick , M. B., Paris , M. W., & Haines , B. M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.00647

2023 arXiv
[112]

2008, Living Reviews in Relativity, 11, 10

Chamel , N., & Haensel , P. 2008, Living Reviews in Relativity, 11, 10

2008
[113]

1949, , 110, 329

Chandrasekhar , S. 1949, , 110, 329

1949
[114]

J., Wharton , R

Chatterjee , S., Law , C. J., Wharton , R. S., et al. 2017, , 541, 58

2017
[115]

Chatzopoulos , E., & Wheeler , J. C. 2012 a , , 748, 42

2012
[116]

2012 b , , 760, 154

---. 2012 b , , 760, 154

2012
[117]

Chen , B., Kantowski , R., Baron , E., Knop , S., & Hauschildt , P. H. 2007, , 380, 104

2007
[118]

J., Liodakis , I., Middei , R., et al

Chen , C.-T. J., Liodakis , I., Middei , R., et al. 2024, , 974, 50

2024
[119]

R., Piro , A

Chen , Y., Drout , M. R., Piro , A. L., et al. 2023, , 955, 43

2023
[120]

Chevalier, R., & Blondin, J. M. 1995, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 444, no. 1, p. 312-317, 444, 312

1995
[121]

Chevalier , R. A. 1982, , 259, 302

1982
[122]

1989, , 346, 847

---. 1989, , 346, 847

1989
[123]

A., & Fransson , C

Chevalier , R. A., & Fransson , C. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Murdin , 875

2017
[124]

C., Bandura , K

CHIME/FRB Collaboration , Andersen , B. C., Bandura , K. M., et al. 2020, , 587, 54

2020
[125]

C., et al

CHIME/FRB Collaboration , Amiri , M., Andersen , B. C., et al. 2021, , 257, 59

2021
[126]

X., Wood , S

Coffing , S. X., Wood , S. R., Byvank , T., et al. 2024, Physics of Plasmas, 31, 113301

2024
[127]

A., Grasberger , W

Colgate , S. A., Grasberger , W. H., & White , R. H. 1961, , 66, 280

1961
[128]

Combi, L., & Siegel, D. M. 2023, Phys. Rev. Lett., 131, 231402

2023
[129]

Comisso , L., & Asenjo , F. A. 2021, , 103, 023014

2021
[130]

R., & Muzio , M

Comisso , L., Farrar , G. R., & Muzio , M. S. 2024, , 977, L18

2024
[131]

2019, , 886, 122

Comisso , L., & Sironi , L. 2019, , 886, 122

2019
[132]

M., Scholz , P., Pearlman , A

Cook , A. M., Scholz , P., Pearlman , A. B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.11895

2024
[133]

J., & Wadiasingh , Z

Cooper , A. J., & Wadiasingh , Z. 2024, , 533, 2133

2024
[134]

L., Margutti , R., Terreran , G., et al

Coppejans , D. L., Margutti , R., Terreran , G., et al. 2020, , 895, L23

2020
[135]

Coppi , P. S. 2000, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, Vol. 5, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division \#5, 23.11

2000
[136]

L., Belczynski , K., et al

C \^o t \'e , B., Fryer , C. L., Belczynski , K., et al. 2018, , 855, 99

2018
[137]

A., Campana, S., & Esposito, P

Coti Zelati, F., Rea, N., Pons, J. A., Campana, S., & Esposito, P. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 961. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2679

2017 doi
[138]

B., Burns, E., et al

Cunningham, V., Cenko, S. B., Burns, E., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 879, 40

2019
[139]

P., Sirota , S., Kaspi , V

Curtin , A. P., Sirota , S., Kaspi , V. M., et al. 2024, , 972, 125

2024
[140]

H., Amthor, A

Cyburt, R. H., Amthor, A. M., Ferguson, R., et al. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 189, 240

2010
[141]

2017, , 469, 1354

Dai , L., & Fang , K. 2017, , 469, 1354

2017
[142]

C., & Miller , M

Dai , L., McKinney , J. C., & Miller , M. C. 2017, , 470, L92

2017
[143]

2021, , 920, 46

Dai , S., Lu , J., Wang , C., et al. 2021, , 920, 46

2021
[144]

R., Kuiper , L., Hermsen , W., et al

den Hartog , P. R., Kuiper , L., Hermsen , W., et al. 2008, , 489, 245

2008
[145]

A., Herwig , F., Battino , U., et al

Denissenkov , P. A., Herwig , F., Battino , U., et al. 2017, , 834, L10

2017
[146]

A., Truran , J

Denissenkov , P. A., Truran , J. W., Pignatari , M., et al. 2014, , 442, 2058

2014
[147]

D., Peterson , B

Denney , K. D., Peterson , B. M., Dietrich , M., Vestergaard , M., & Bentz , M. C. 2009, , 692, 246

2009
[148]

Dessart , L., & Hillier , D. J. 2011, , 410, 1739

2011
[149]

L., Ehlert , S

Di Gesu , L., Marshall , H. L., Ehlert , S. R., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1245

2023
[150]

2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38, 153001

Di Valentino , E., Mena , O., Pan , S., et al. 2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38, 153001

2021
[151]

W., Jin , C., Blaes , O., & Ward , M

Done , C., Davis , S. W., Jin , C., Blaes , O., & Ward , M. 2012, , 420, 1848

2012
[152]

2023, Proc

Donello, M., Palkar, G., Naderi, M., Del Rey Fern \'a ndez, D., & Babaee, H. 2023, Proc. R. Soc. A, 479, 20230320

2023
[153]

R., Chornock , R., Soderberg , A

Drout , M. R., Chornock , R., Soderberg , A. M., et al. 2014, , 794, 23

2014
[154]

Duncan, R. C. 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 498, L45. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/311303

1998 doi
[155]

C., & Thompson , C

Duncan , R. C., & Thompson , C. 1992, , 392, L9

1992
[156]

2019, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 51, 357

Duraisamy, K., Iaccarino, G., & Xiao, H. 2019, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 51, 357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547

2019 doi
[157]

Durant , M., & van Kerkwijk , M. H. 2005, , 627, 376

2005
[158]

2019, , 870, 123

Edelson , R., Gelbord , J., Cackett , E., et al. 2019, , 870, 123

2019
[159]

2017, , 849, 162

Eftekhari , T., & Berger , E. 2017, , 849, 162

2017
[160]

D., et al

Eftekhari , T., Tchekhovskoy , A., Alexander , K. D., et al. 2024 a , , 974, 149

2024
[161]

2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.23336

Eftekhari , T., Dong , Y., Fong , W., et al. 2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.23336

2024 arXiv
[162]

R., Ferrazzoli , R., Marinucci , A., et al

Ehlert , S. R., Ferrazzoli , R., Marinucci , A., et al. 2022, , 935, 116

2022
[163]

Eichler , D., Livio , M., Piran , T., & Schramm , D. N. 1989, , 340, 126

1989
[164]

P., Lyu , J., et al

Endsley , R., Stark , D. P., Lyu , J., et al. 2023, , 520, 4609

2023
[165]

A., Yoder, N

Engstrom, T. A., Yoder, N. C., & Crespi, V. H. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 818, 183. https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/183

2016 doi
[166]

2010, , 722, L162

Enoto , T., Nakazawa , K., Makishima , K., et al. 2010, , 722, L162

2010
[167]

2023, , 678, A50

EPTA Collaboration , InPTA Collaboration , Antoniadis , J., et al. 2023, , 678, A50

2023
[168]

1966, Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 626

Erber , T. 1966, Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 626

1966
[169]

2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13745

Evans, M., Corsi, A., Afle, C., et al. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13745

2023 arXiv
[170]

2019, , 875, L1

Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration , Akiyama , K., Alberdi , A., et al. 2019, , 875, L1

2019
[171]

Fabian , A. C. 1999, , 308, L39

1999
[172]

C., Lohfink , A., Kara , E., et al

Fabian , A. C., Lohfink , A., Kara , E., et al. 2015, , 451, 4375

2015
[173]

C., Zoghbi , A., Wilkins , D., et al

Fabian , A. C., Zoghbi , A., Wilkins , D., et al. 2012, , 419, 116

2012
[174]

C., Murase , K., & Oikonomou , F

Fang , K., Kotera , K., Miller , M. C., Murase , K., & Oikonomou , F. 2016, , 2016, 017

2016
[175]

R., & Piran , T

Farrar , G. R., & Piran , T. 2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1411.0704

2014 arXiv
[176]

2023, Physics Reports, 1010, 1, advances in QED with intense background fields

Fedotov, A., Ilderton, A., Karbstein, F., et al. 2023, Physics Reports, 1010, 1, advances in QED with intense background fields. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157323000352

2023
[177]

E., & Couch , S

Fields , C. E., & Couch , S. M. 2020, , 901, 33

2020
[178]

D., & Smith , N

Fox , O. D., & Smith , N. 2019, , 488, 3772

2019
[179]

L., Benz , W., & Herant , M

Fryer , C. L., Benz , W., & Herant , M. 1996, , 460, 801

1996
[180]

L., Fontes , C

Fryer , C. L., Fontes , C. J., Warsa , J. S., et al. 2020, , 898, 123

2020
[181]

L., & Warren , M

Fryer , C. L., & Warren , M. S. 2002, , 574, L65

2002
[182]

L., Keiter , P

Fryer , C. L., Keiter , P. A., Sharma , V., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.16677

2023 arXiv
[183]

M., Kusenko , A., & Petraki , K

Fuller , G. M., Kusenko , A., & Petraki , K. 2009, Physics Letters B, 670, 281

2009
[184]

2012, , 85, 032801

Gandolfi , S., Carlson , J., & Reddy , S. 2012, , 85, 032801

2012
[185]

2023, Frontiers in Physics, 11, doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1180821

Gatu Johnson, M., Hale, G., Paris, M., Wiescher, M., & Zylstra, A. 2023, Frontiers in Physics, 11, doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1180821. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2023.1180821

2023
[186]

2004, , 611, 1005

Gehrels , N., Chincarini , G., Giommi , P., et al. 2004, , 611, 1005

2004
[187]

2007, , 463, 79

Gilli , R., Comastri , A., & Hasinger , G. 2007, , 463, 79

2007
[188]

G., Marklund, M., & Bulanov, S

Gonoskov, A., Blackburn, T. G., Marklund, M., & Bulanov, S. S. 2022, Rev. Mod. Phys., 94, 045001. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045001

2022 doi
[189]

C., Fong , W.-f., Kilpatrick , C

Gordon , A. C., Fong , W.-f., Kilpatrick , C. D., et al. 2023, , 954, 80

2023
[190]

2006, , 449, L31

G \"o tz , D., Mereghetti , S., Tiengo , A., & Esposito , P. 2006, , 449, L31

2006
[191]

2018, , 563, 657

Gravity Collaboration , Sturm , E., Dexter , J., et al. 2018, , 563, 657

2018
[192]

2022, , 935, 157

Guarini , E., Tamborra , I., & Margutti , R. 2022, , 935, 157

2022
[193]

2014, , 113, 155005

Guo , F., Li , H., Daughton , W., & Liu , Y.-H. 2014, , 113, 155005

2014
[194]

2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 080501

Guo , F., Liu , Y.-H., Li , X., et al. 2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 080501

2020
[195]

2024, , 220, 43

Guo , F., Liu , Y.-H., Zenitani , S., & Hoshino , M. 2024, , 220, 43

2024
[196]

H. E. S. S. Collaboration , Abdalla , H., Abramowski , A., et al. 2018, , 612, A2

2018
[197]

H. E. S. S. Collaboration , Aharonian , F., Ait Benkhali , F., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1341

2023
[198]

1991, , 380, L51

Haardt , F., & Maraschi , L. 1991, , 380, L51

1991
[199]

K., Baring , M

Harding , A. K., Baring , M. G., & Gonthier , P. L. 1997, , 476, 246

1997
[200]

K., Kalapotharakos , C., Barnard , M., & Venter , C

Harding , A. K., Kalapotharakos , C., Barnard , M., & Venter , C. 2018, , 869, L18

2018
[201]

K., & Lai , D

Harding , A. K., & Lai , D. 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2631

2006
[202]

2018, The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars, 401

Haskell, B., & Sedrakian, A. 2018, The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars, 401

2018
[203]

2019, , 886, 114

Hayasaki , K., & Yamazaki , R. 2019, , 886, 114

2019
[204]

S., Lamb , G., et al

Hayes , F., Heng , I. S., Lamb , G., et al. 2023, , 954, 92

2023
[205]

R., Fryer , C

Herant , M., Benz , W., Hix , W. R., Fryer , C. L., & Colgate , S. A. 1994, , 435, 339

1994
[206]

V., Edelson , R., Horne , K., et al

Hern \'a ndez Santisteban , J. V., Edelson , R., Horne , K., et al. 2020, , 498, 5399

2020
[207]

R., Mao , H., et al

Herwig , F., Woodward , P. R., Mao , H., et al. 2023, , 525, 1601

2023
[208]

2010, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 015003

Hild , S., Chelkowski , S., Freise , A., et al. 2010, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 015003

2010
[209]

D., et al

Hiramatsu , D., Berger , E., Metzger , B. D., et al. 2023, , 947, L28

2023
[210]

Ho , A. Y. Q., Phinney , E. S., Ravi , V., et al. 2019, , 871, 73

2019
[211]

Ho , A. Y. Q., Perley , D. A., Yao , Y., et al. 2022, , 938, 85

2022
[212]

Ho , A. Y. Q., Perley , D. A., Gal-Yam , A., et al. 2023 a , , 949, 120

2023
[213]

Ho , A. Y. Q., Perley , D. A., Chen , P., et al. 2023 b , , 623, 927

2023
[214]

Holoien , T. W. S., Brown , J. S., Auchettl , K., et al. 2018, , 480, 5689

2018
[215]

F., Hernquist , L., Cox , T

Hopkins , P. F., Hernquist , L., Cox , T. J., et al. 2006, , 163, 1

2006
[216]

J., Caballero , O

Horowitz , C. J., Caballero , O. L., & Berry , D. K. 2009, , 79, 026103

2009
[217]

2024 a , , 626, 500

Hu , C.-P., Narita , T., Enoto , T., et al. 2024 a , , 626, 500

2024
[218]

G., Harding , A

Hu , K., Baring , M. G., Harding , A. K., & Wadiasingh , Z. 2022, , 940, 91

2022
[219]

G., Wadiasingh , Z., & Harding , A

Hu , K., Baring , M. G., Wadiasingh , Z., & Harding , A. K. 2019, , 486, 3327

2019
[220]

X., Nichols , K

Hu , S. X., Nichols , K. A., Shaffer , N. R., et al. 2024 b , Physics of Plasmas, 31, 040501

2024
[221]

L., et al

Huppenkothen , D., D'Angelo , C., Watts , A. L., et al. 2014, , 787, 128

2014
[222]

2022, , 601, 526

Hurley-Walker , N., Zhang , X., Bahramian , A., et al. 2022, , 601, 526

2022
[223]

J., et al

Hurley-Walker , N., Rea , N., McSweeney , S. J., et al. 2023, , 619, 487

2023
[224]

G., Ackermann , M., et al

IceCube Collaboration , Aartsen , M. G., Ackermann , M., et al. 2018, Science, 361, 147

2018
[225]

2022, Science, 378, 538

IceCube Collaboration , Abbasi , R., Ackermann , M., et al. 2022, Science, 378, 538

2022
[226]

G., Levan , A

Inkenhaag , A., Jonker , P. G., Levan , A. J., et al. 2023, , 525, 4042

2023
[227]

2019, , 487, 4884

Ioka , K., & Nakamura , T. 2019, , 487, 4884

2019
[228]

L., Belloni , T., Stella , L., et al

Israel , G. L., Belloni , T., Stella , L., et al. 2005, , 628, L53

2005
[229]

2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 38097, 1

Izzo , L., Chrimes , A., Malesani , D., et al. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 38097, 1

2024
[230]

2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 953, L12

Jiang, N., Zhou, Z., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, T. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 953, L12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acebe3

2023 doi
[231]

C., Nelson , A., Woodward , P., et al

Joggerst , C. C., Nelson , A., Woodward , P., et al. 2014, Journal of Computational Physics, 275, 154

2014
[232]

A., Fields, B

Johnson, J. A., Fields, B. D., & Thompson, T. A. 2020, Philosophical transactions of the royal society A, 378, 20190301

2020
[233]

2014, , 797, 83

Jones , S., Hirschi , R., & Nomoto , K. 2014, , 797, 83

2014
[234]

2013, , 772, 150

Jones , S., Hirschi , R., Nomoto , K., et al. 2013, , 772, 150

2013
[235]

2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol

Kallman , T., Bautista , M., Betancourt-Martinez , G., et al. 2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51, 156

2019
[236]

S., Dov c iak , M., Papadakis , I

Kammoun , E. S., Dov c iak , M., Papadakis , I. E., Caballero-Garc \' a , M. D., & Karas , V. 2021 a , , 907, 20

2021
[237]

S., Papadakis , I

Kammoun , E. S., Papadakis , I. E., & Dov c iak , M. 2021 b , , 503, 4163

2021
[238]

A., et al

Kara , E., Mehdipour , M., Kriss , G. A., et al. 2021, , 922, 151

2021
[239]

E., Kevrekidis, I

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., et al. 2021, Nature Review Physics, 3, 422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

2021 doi
[240]

M., & Beloborodov , A

Kaspi , V. M., & Beloborodov , A. M. 2017, , 55, 261

2017
[241]

Kato , T. N. 2007, , 668, 974

2007
[242]

A., Racusin, J

Kennea, J. A., Racusin, J. L., Burns, E., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03980

2024 arXiv
[243]

K., & Kasen , D

Khatami , D. K., & Kasen , D. N. 2024, , 972, 140

2024
[244]

D., Tejos , N., Andersen , B

Kilpatrick , C. D., Tejos , N., Andersen , B. C., et al. 2024, , 964, 121

2024
[245]

2022, , 602, 585

Kirsten , F., Marcote , B., Nimmo , K., et al. 2022, , 602, 585

2022
[246]

2024, Nature Astron., 8, 298

Kiuchi, K., Reboul-Salze, A., Shibata, M., & Sekiguchi, Y. 2024, Nature Astron., 8, 298

2024
[247]

I., & Lugaro, M

Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Lugaro, M. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 900, 179

2020
[248]

2015, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 7, 148

Komossa, S. 2015, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 7, 148

2015
[249]

1998, , 393, 235

Kouveliotou , C., Dieters , S., Strohmayer , T., et al. 1998, , 393, 235

1998
[250]

Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Y., Reader, J., & Team, N. A. 2024, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 5.12), Online, NIST, available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [Mon Dec 23 2024], doi:10.18434/T4W30F

2024 doi
[251]

2004, , 613, 1173

Kuiper , L., Hermsen , W., & Mendez , M. 2004, , 613, 1173

2004
[252]

V., Norman, G

Kuksin, A., Morozov, I. V., Norman, G. E., Stegailov, V. V., & Valuev, I. A. 2005, Molecular Simulation, 31, 1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927020500375259

2005 doi
[253]

2017, , 468, 2726

Kumar , P., Lu , W., & Bhattacharya , M. 2017, , 468, 2726

2017
[254]

C., Park , H

Kuranz , C. C., Park , H. S., Huntington , C. M., et al. 2018, Nature Communications, 9, 1564

2018
[255]

P., & Kobayashi , S

Lamb , G. P., & Kobayashi , S. 2018, , 478, 733

2018
[256]

K., Gourgouliatos , K

Lander , S. K., Gourgouliatos , K. N., Wadiasingh , Z., & Antonopoulou , D. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.08020

2024
[257]

A., Papadakis , I

Langis , D. A., Papadakis , I. E., Kammoun , E., Panagiotou , C., & Dov c iak , M. 2024, , 691, A252

2024
[258]

M., & Prakash , M

Lattimer , J. M., & Prakash , M. 2001, , 550, 426

2001
[259]

M., & Prakash, M

Lattimer, J. M., & Prakash, M. 2004, Science, 304, 536

2004
[260]

M., & Schramm , D

Lattimer , J. M., & Schramm , D. N. 1974, , 192, L145

1974
[261]

J., Bhardwaj , M., Burke-Spolaor , S., et al

Law , C. J., Bhardwaj , M., Burke-Spolaor , S., et al. 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, 16701, 1

2024
[262]

2025, Nature Astronomy, 1

Lee, Y., Caleb, M., Murphy, T., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 1

2025
[263]

Leidi , G., Andrassy , R., Higl , J., Edelmann , P. V. F., & R \"o pke , F. K. 2023, , 679, A132

2023
[264]

2021, , 915, 80

Leung , S.-C., Fuller , J., & Nomoto , K. 2021, , 915, 80

2021
[265]

J., Wynn , G

Levan , A. J., Wynn , G. A., Chapman , R., et al. 2006, , 368, L1

2006
[266]

J., Tanvir , N

Levan , A. J., Tanvir , N. R., Cenko , S. B., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 199

2011
[267]

J., Gompertz, B

Levan, A. J., Gompertz, B. P., Salafia, O. S., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 737

2024
[268]

2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 418, 659

Levin, Y., & van Hoven, M. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 418, 659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19515.x

2011
[269]

K., Lin , L., Xiong , S

Li , C. K., Lin , L., Xiong , S. L., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 378

2021
[270]

2022, , 931, 56

Li , X., Ge , M., Lin , L., et al. 2022, , 931, 56

2022
[271]

2023, , 945, 86

Linial , I., & Sari , R. 2023, , 945, 86

2023
[272]

R., & Erkes , J

Linscott , I. R., & Erkes , J. W. 1980, , 236, L109

1980
[273]

W., Filippenko , A

Liodakis , I., Romani , R. W., Filippenko , A. V., et al. 2018, , 480, 5517

2018
[274]

P., Agudo , I., et al

Liodakis , I., Marscher , A. P., Agudo , I., et al. 2022, , 611, 677

2022
[275]

2023, , 669, A75

Liu , Z., Malyali , A., Krumpe , M., et al. 2023, , 669, A75

2023
[276]

R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777

2007
[277]

Lynden-Bell, D., & Pringle, J. E. 1974, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 168, 603. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/168.3.603

1974 doi
[278]

2021, , 922, 166

Lyutikov , M. 2021, , 922, 166

2021
[279]

P., Prochaska , J

Macquart , J. P., Prochaska , J. X., McQuinn , M., et al. 2020, , 581, 391

2020
[280]

A., Burns, E., et al

Macquet, A., Bizouard, M. A., Burns, E., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 918, 80. https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac0efd

2021 doi
[281]

2024, , 975, 271

Mao , H., Woodward , P., Herwig , F., et al. 2024, , 975, 271

2024
[282]

2020, , 889, 164

Marcotulli , L., Paliya , V., Ajello , M., et al. 2020, , 889, 164

2020
[283]

M., et al

Marcotulli , L., Ajello , M., Urry , C. M., et al. 2022, , 940, 77

2022
[284]

2016, Reports on Progress in Physics, 79, 046901

Marcowith , A., Bret , A., Bykov , A., et al. 2016, Reports on Progress in Physics, 79, 046901

2016
[285]

Margalit , B., Berger , E., & Metzger , B. D. 2019, , 886, 110

2019
[286]

Margalit , B., & Metzger , B. D. 2018, , 868, L4

2018
[287]

2021, , 923, L14

Margalit , B., & Quataert , E. 2021, , 923, L14

2021
[288]

D., Chornock , R., et al

Margutti , R., Metzger , B. D., Chornock , R., et al. 2019, , 872, 18

2019
[289]

E., Ingram , A., et al

Marin , F., Gianolli , V. E., Ingram , A., et al. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 35

2024
[290]

F., Vasconcellos, C

Marranghello, G. F., Vasconcellos, C. A., & de Freitas Pacheco, J. A. 2002, Physical Review D, 66, 064027

2002
[291]

P., Di Gesu , L., Jorstad , S

Marscher , A. P., Di Gesu , L., Jorstad , S. G., et al. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 50

2024
[292]

L., Liodakis , I., Marscher , A

Marshall , H. L., Liodakis , I., Marscher , A. P., et al. 2024, , 972, 74

2024
[293]

2016, , 589, A59

Masini , A., Comastri , A., Balokovi \'c , M., et al. 2016, , 589, A59

2016
[294]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.01581

Masterson , M., Kara , E., Panagiotou , C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.01581

2025 arXiv
[295]

2021, , 652, A1

Mastrogiovanni , S., Duque , R., Chassande-Mottin , E., Daigne , F., & Mochkovitch , R. 2021, , 652, A1

2021
[296]

E., Schultz , P

Mattsson , A. E., Schultz , P. A., Desjarlais , M. P., Mattsson , T. R., & Leung , K. 2005, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 13, R1

2005
[297]

R., H \"o flich , P

Maund , J. R., H \"o flich , P. A., Steele , I. A., et al. 2023, , 521, 3323

2023
[298]

M., & Lazzati , D

Mauney , C. M., & Lazzati , D. 2016, , 133, 31

2016
[299]

2018, Molecular Astrophysics, 12, 1

---. 2018, Molecular Astrophysics, 12, 1

2018
[300]

M., Connolly , S

McHardy , I. M., Connolly , S. D., Horne , K., et al. 2018, , 480, 2881

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.co...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t...

[3] [3]

I-process Nucleosynthesis and Mass Retention Efficiency in He-shell Flash Evolution of Rapidly Accreting White Dwarfs

thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

arXiv 2016

[4] [4]

G., Abbott , R., Abouelfettouh , I., et al

Abac , A. G., Abbott , R., Abouelfettouh , I., et al. 2024, , 970, L34

2024

[5] [5]

P., et al

Abbott, B. P., et al. 2017, , 119, 161101

2017

[6] [6]

P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T

Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2017, , 848, L12

2017

[7] [7]

2020, , 247, 33

Abdollahi , S., Acero , F., Ackermann , M., et al. 2020, , 247, 33

2020

[8] [8]

U., Albert , A., Alfaro , R., et al

Abeysekara , A. U., Albert , A., Alfaro , R., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 911

2017