Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 5 cited by

Improved post-Newtonian waveform model for inspiralling precessing-eccentric compact binaries

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read pyEFPE derives exact closed-form Newtonian Fourier mode amplitudes and a numerically stable multiple-scale spin-precession solver, yielding frequency-domain inspiral waveforms for precessing-eccentric compact binaries that are accurate…

desk verdict A genuinely useful engineering paper that fills a real gap in eccentric-precessing waveform modeling, with one concrete typo in Eq. (63c) that needs checking before the code version is trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03929 v2 pith:XNSB5HTE submitted 2025-02-06 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM

Gonzalo Morras , Geraint Pratten , Patricia Schmidt This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords gravitationalwaveseccentricbinariesspinprecessionpost-Newtonianapproximationfrequency-domainwaveformmultiplescaleanalysisBesselfunctionsparameterestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

pyEFPE is a frequency-domain post-Newtonian waveform model built to describe the inspiral of compact binaries that are simultaneously spinning, with misaligned spins that precess, and eccentric. The paper's central claim is that this combination can be modeled accurately and fast enough for data analysis by writing the Newtonian Fourier mode amplitudes exactly in closed form as Bessel functions, rewriting the multiple-scale-analysis treatment of spin precession to avoid large numerical cancellations, and adding recently derived 2.5PN and 3PN spin corrections to the evolution equations. The authors validate the model against established waveforms in quasi-circular and eccentric aligned-spin limits and show that it recovers the parameters of simulated signals, including one produced by a different precessing model. A sympathetic reader would care because eccentric-precessing binaries are expected in several formation channels, and no widely available frequency-domain model previously covered both effects during the inspiral.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Fourier coefficient $N^{22}_{j-2}$: the amplitude of the $(l,m)=(2,2)$ gravitational-wave mode when the co-precessing waveform is expanded in harmonics of the mean anomaly. Eq. (31) gives it exactly as a combination of Bessel functions $J_j(je)$, $J_{j\pm 1}(je)$, and $J_{j\pm 2}(je)$, derived by writing the mode as a total derivative with respect to the mean anomaly, integrating by parts, and applying Bessel's integral representation. This identity replaces the infinite nested sums of the previous model. The second load-bearing mechanism is the multiple-scale analysis of spin precession, whose secular and periodic parts are expressed through Jacobi elliptic functions and elliptic integrals; the paper rewrites the cubic-polynomial roots and the Euler-angle integrations to avoid the numerical cancellation that plagued earlier implementations.

What would settle it

Run the full 2PN precession equations numerically for a binary in the transitional-precession or nutational-resonance region and compare the Fourier-domain phase of the dominant harmonic with pyEFPE over the same frequency band; an accumulated phase disagreement large enough to shift the detector-weighted match by more than the noise-driven threshold would show that the timescale-separation assumption fails exactly where the paper flags it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that the leading-order gravitational-wave modes of an eccentric binary can be Fourier-decomposed exactly: the $N^{22}_{j-2}$ amplitudes, which earlier work expressed as truncated nested sums, satisfy the closed-form Bessel-function expression of Eq. (31). This removes the main accuracy bottleneck of the amplitude sector. The paper further claims that the multiple-scale-analysis solution for spin precession can be rewritten in a numerically stable form, that the evolution equations gain accuracy from newly derived aligned-spin eccentric post-Newtonian corrections, and that the resulting waveform pyEFPE matches other models in the relevant limits and recovers simulated signals in Bayesian parameter estimation. If these claims hold, pyEFPE is the first publicly available, efficient frequency-domain model for inspiral signals containing both orbital eccentricity and spin precession.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes radiation reaction is slow compared with spin precession and that the direction of the total angular momentum stays fixed, so binaries that pass through strong nutational resonances or transitional precession fall outside its validity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Eq. (31) removes the need to truncate infinite nested sums for the Newtonian mode amplitudes, making amplitude evaluation exact at that order and faster.
  • The added 2.5PN and 3PN aligned-spin eccentric corrections improve the inspiral phase evolution, especially for longer signals where small phase errors accumulate.
  • Interpolating the slowly varying waveform amplitudes yields up to an order-15 speedup, with 95% of tested mismatches below $10^{-6}$, bringing parameter-estimation runtimes from months to days.
  • pyEFPE recovers the injected parameters of both its own eccentric-precessing signals and quasi-circular precessing signals generated by a different precessing model, with the eccentric chirp mass absorbing the eccentricity-chirp-mass degeneracy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because Eq. (31) is exact at Newtonian order and built from standard Bessel functions, the same integration-by-parts route is a natural template for deriving analytic higher-PN mode amplitudes, which the model currently lacks.
  • For low-mass binaries the orbital and precession timescales are cleanly separated, and the paper's recovery shows only mild correlation between initial eccentricity and the effective precession spin parameter; a testable prediction is that eccentricity and precession can be disentangled for such systems, while high-mass systems will need the higher-PN and merger terms the model omits.
  • The phase-based cycle-counting argument implies parameter accuracy is limited by the accumulated orbital and periastron-advance cycles, suggesting pyEFPE-type models will be especially powerful for long low-frequency signals expected in future space-based detectors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces pyEFPE, a frequency-domain post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for compact binaries that combine spin precession with orbital eccentricity. The model builds on the EFPE line of work by deriving closed-form Newtonian Fourier mode amplitudes, reformulating the multiple-scale-analysis spin-precession solution for numerical stability, adding recently derived PN eccentric-spin corrections, and implementing an amplitude-interpolation scheme that yields up to an order-of-magnitude speedup. The authors validate the model through phenomenological checks, mismatches against SpinTaylorT4, TaylorF2, IMRPhenomXP, and TaylorF2Ecc in limiting regimes, and Bayesian parameter-estimation studies with pyEFPE and IMRPhenomXP injections.

Significance. If the printed equations are correct, pyEFPE would be a useful and timely public tool for precessing-eccentric inspiral science, with the closed-form Bessel amplitudes and the interpolation speedup being concrete practical advances. The limit comparisons and the parameter-estimation demonstrations are appropriate first steps. However, two central equations in the amplitude and precession sections appear to be internally inconsistent as printed, and the full precessing-eccentric regime is not directly validated against an independent model or direct numerical integration. The manuscript is therefore promising but needs substantive corrections and one additional validation step before the central accuracy claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Eq. (63c)] The printed discriminant contains p_perp^2(p_par^2 + 8 p_perp)/27, but expanding (p/3)^3 - (q/2)^2 from Eqs. (61)-(62) gives p_par^2 p_perp^2/3 + 8 p_perp^3/27 + p_par d_perp (p_par^2 + p_perp) - d_perp^2/4, all divided by y^6. The first term is therefore missing a factor of 9. Because G enters Y_3, Y_plus/minus, delta_chi_plus/minus, delta_chi_av, delta_chi_diff, and the Euler-angle solutions (Eqs. 63-71, 78-81), this is a load-bearing expression. Please state whether the pyEFPE code implements the corrected factor; if the code uses Eq. (63c) as printed, the MSA precession dynamics are numerically incorrect.
  2. [§II.C, Eq. (31)] The closed-form Newtonian amplitude formula fails the circular-orbit limit. Setting e = 0 and j = 2 in Eq. (31) gives N^22_0 = 3/2, whereas Eq. (20b) evaluated at e = 0 gives H_hat_22 = 2 e^{-2i lambda}, and Eq. (36b) correspondingly gives ||H_hat_22||^2 = 4; equivalently the Parseval sum of Eq. (31) at e = 0 is 9/4, not 4. The formula also produces a non-vanishing N^22_{-4} at e = 0. Since this equation is a central claimed improvement of the paper, the printed expression must be corrected or the derivation checked; the good limit agreement in Sec. VII suggests the code may already use a corrected form.
  3. [§VII.A and §IV.B/VI.B] The combined precessing-eccentric regime is not directly validated. All mismatch comparisons in Sec. VII.A are performed in limiting cases: quasi-circular precessing (Figs. 8, 10, 11) or eccentric aligned-spin (Figs. 12, 13). The only full-regime test, the pyEFPE self-injection in Sec. VII.B.1, is a self-consistency check and provides no external benchmark. In addition, Eq. (111) drops the periodic part delta_Delta_J^2 and Sec. VI.B fixes J(t) = J_0, with the authors noting possible failure for nutational resonances or transitional precession. Given the paper's central claim of accuracy for precessing-eccentric inspirals, please add a direct test of the combined regime, for example by comparing the MSA solution against direct numerical integration of the precession equations of Eq. (42) together with radiation reaction for a parameter scan in eccentricity and spin orientation, and quantify where the MSA/adiabatic assumptions break down.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§II.C, Eq. (36b)] The left-hand side of Eq. (36b) is labeled ||H_hat_20||^2, but the expression shown is for the (2,2) mode; it should read ||H_hat_22||^2.
  2. [§II.C, Eq. (29)] If Eq. (31) is meant to follow from Eq. (29), the final term involving sin 2u appears to need a factor of 2 in the coefficient; please verify the consistency of Eqs. (29) and (31) carefully.
  3. [§V, Eq. (109)-(110)] The SUA linear system is described as correcting a factor-of-1/2 typo, but the reader would benefit from a short derivation or a direct reference to the original system in Ref. [87], since the substitution a_k -> a_k/2 changes the interpretation of Eq. (110b).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all load-bearing inputs are external PN/Keplerian results, and validation uses independent waveform models.

full rationale

pyEFPE's central derivation chain is self-contained and noncircular. Equation (31) derives closed-form Newtonian Fourier mode amplitudes from the Keplerian parametrization and standard Bessel-function integrals, not from the model's outputs. The MSA spin-precession solution is re-derived from the PN spin equations and analytic elliptic-function solutions, with prior EFPE papers [74-76] used as background formalism and typo sources, not as evidence for the predictions. The PN phasing and spin contributions come from externally derived calculations, notably Ref. [55], and the paper explicitly corrects rather than imports their content. Validation is external: mismatch comparisons are made against independent approximants (SpinTaylorT4, TaylorF2, TaylorF2Ecc, IMRPhenomXP), and the parameter-estimation study includes an IMRPhenomXP injection as an independent benchmark. The pyEFPE-with-pyEFPE injection is a self-consistency and sampler check, not a claim of independent physical validation, so it is not circular. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled in through self-citation. Stated limitations, such as the MSA failing in strong nutational resonances or transitional precession and the fixed J-frame approximation, are acknowledged domain restrictions rather than circular argumentation. Possible algebraic typos, e.g. in Eq. (63c), are correctness concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new physical entities such as particles, forces, or dimensions. The free parameters are implementation tolerances and interpolation settings that affect accuracy and speed, while the main physical and mathematical assumptions are the standard post-Newtonian and multiple-scale approximations used in waveform modeling.

free parameters (4)
  • Amplitude tolerance epsilon_N = 1e-3 (default)
    Controls how many Fourier modes N^lm_p are kept in the strain sum, Eq. (39). Chosen by hand as an accuracy/speed tradeoff; the likelihood-error bound in App. B links it to SNR.
  • SUA order kmax = 3 (default)
    Number of shifted evaluation points in the shifted uniform asymptotics Fourier approximation, Eq. (109). Chosen empirically as a compromise.
  • Interpolation points per precession cycle Np and extra Chebyshev points Nextra = Np=40, Nextra=2 (defaults)
    Used for amplitude interpolation in Sec. VI D; chosen as a compromise between accuracy and runtime.
  • Gimbal-lock regularization floor epsilon_D = not specified in text
    In Eqs. (84)-(85), D+/- is clamped to prevent 0/0 indeterminacies in the elliptic-integral expressions for the Euler angles; this effectively switches off precession near alignment.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Quasi-Keplerian parametrization of the orbit with secular periastron advance only, ignoring small periodic orbital corrections.
    Invoked in Sec. II A, Eq. (2), to write the orbital phase in terms of lambda and delta-lambda.
  • domain assumption Newtonian quadrupole order for waveform amplitudes: only l=2, m=0, +/-2 modes contribute.
    Sec. II C; the model omits higher-order modes and amplitude PN corrections, as acknowledged in the conclusion.
  • domain assumption Radiation-reaction timescale is much longer than the spin-precession timescale, justifying precession averaging.
    Secs. III and IV; used to replace oscillating spin quantities by their precession averages in Eq. (111).
  • domain assumption The periodic part of the total-angular-momentum fluctuation, deltaDeltaJ^2, and the evolution of the J-frame direction are negligible.
    Eq. (98) and Sec. VI B; the authors note failure in nutational resonance or transitional precession.
  • domain assumption Spin-precession equations are accurate to 2PN, and 3PN spin corrections are included only in the aligned-spin sector.
    Sec. III and App. C; mismatches with 3PN SpinTaylorT4 grow for long signals.
  • domain assumption The shifted uniform asymptotics (SUA) approximation with series reversion gives accurate frequency-domain waveforms.
    Secs. V and VI C; validated against FFT-based models in limiting cases.
  • ad hoc to paper Gimbal-lock regularization via Eq. (85) preserves the accuracy of the Euler angles.
    Clamping D+/- to epsilon_D is not derived from physics and introduces discontinuities seen in Fig. 6 and interpolation mismatches in Fig. 5.
  • standard math Standard Bessel, Jacobi elliptic, and Wigner D-matrix identities are used.
    Used in Secs. II, III, and App. F; these are established mathematical tools.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Improved post-Newtonian waveform model for inspiralling precessing-eccentric compact binaries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XNSB5HTE

@misc{pith2026250203929,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Improved post-Newtonian waveform model for inspiralling precessing-eccentric compact binaries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XNSB5HTE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03929}
}
read the original abstract

The measurement of spin-precession and orbital eccentricity in gravitational-wave (GW) signals is a key priority in GW astronomy, as these effects not only provide insights into the astrophysical formation and evolution of compact binaries but also, if neglected, could introduce significant biases in parameter estimation, searches, and tests of General Relativity. Despite the growing potential of upcoming LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing runs and future detectors to measure eccentric-precessing signals, accurately and efficiently modeling them remains a challenge. In this work, we present pyEFPE, a frequency-domain post-Newtonian (PN) waveform model for the inspiral of precessing-eccentric compact binaries. pyEFPE improves upon previous models by introducing analytical expressions for the Fourier mode amplitudes, enhancing the numerical stability of the multiple scale analysis framework, and adding recently derived PN corrections, critical to accurately describe signals in GW detectors. Additionally, we simplify the numerical implementation and introduce a scheme to interpolate the amplitudes, achieving a speedup of up to ~O(15) in the waveform computations, making the model practical for data analysis applications. We thoroughly validate pyEFPE by comparing it to other waveform models in the quasi-circular and eccentric-spin-aligned limits, finding good agreement. Additionally, we demonstrate pyEFPE's capability to analyze simulated GW events, accurately recovering the parameters of signals described by both pyEFPE and IMRPhenomXP. While pyEFPE still lacks important physical effects, such as higher-order PN corrections, higher-order modes, mode asymmetries, tidal interactions or the merger-ringdown phase, it represents a significant step towards more complete waveform models, offering a flexible and efficient framework that can be extended in future work to incorporate these effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03929 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Number of Fourier modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Histogram of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Frequency domain polarizations for a highly-eccentric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Time-domain polarizations for the same highly eccentric BNS-like system of Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Real part of the exact and interpolated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Violin plots showing the distribution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Scatter plot of the mismatches between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Violin plots showing the distribution of the mis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Scatter plot of the mismatches between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of the most important intrinsic parameters of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of the most important intrinsic parameters of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Corner plot showing the joint and marginalised 1D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of the chirp mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Here we show the relative error between the exact solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Relative error in the log-likelihood, 2 log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: Plot of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of the most important parameters of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of the most important parameters of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23: Corner plot showing the joint posterior distributions of the most important parameters of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_23.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors compute tail-of-tail contributions to the effective-one-body Q potential through p_r^12 and derive new second-order self-force redshift predictions for eccentric binaries.

  2. Chase Orbits, not Time: A Scalable Paradigm for Long-Duration Eccentric Gravitational-Wave Surrogates

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Eccentric inspiral waveforms are modeled against mean anomaly rather than time, yielding an order-of-magnitude compression and a 2.77e6 M surrogate that is ~20x faster to evaluate.

  3. Black-hole - neutron-star mergers: new numerical-relativity simulations and multipolar effective-one-body model with spin precession and eccentricity

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new catalog of 52 numerical-relativity BHNS merger simulations is used to calibrate TEOBResumS-Dalí, an improved effective-one-body waveform model with multipolar ringdown, spin precession, and eccentricity.

  4. Testing the nature of GW200105 by probing the frequency evolution of eccentricity

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GW200105's recovered eccentricity as a function of frequency is consistent with the general-relativistic decay law at 68% confidence, supporting the eccentric-orbit interpretation.

  5. Revisiting GW150914 with a non-planar, eccentric waveform model

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a waveform model that includes both eccentricity and spin precession, the authors confirm GW150914 was a quasi-circular, slowly spinning black hole merger, with eccentricity below 0.08 at 15 Hz.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

198 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Evolution of y and e2 We obtain the non-spinning evolution of y and e2 from the evolution of x = (1 − e2)y2 = (M ω)2/3 and e, given in Ref. [193]. As was noted in Ref. [117], Ref. [193] has an error in the expression for d e/dt, coming from the fact that they obtained it by just transforming the eccentricity from ADM to harmonic coordinates (i.e. eADM → e...

    2016

  2. [2]

    (87d)), we need an expression for the periastron advance k, which we express as the following PN series: k = y2 4X n=0 knyn

    Evolution of the argument of periastron δλ For the evolution equation of the argument of periastron δλ (Eq. (87d)), we need an expression for the periastron advance k, which we express as the following PN series: k = y2 4X n=0 knyn. (C10) The non-spinning part of kn can be obtained from Ref. [193], by taking the expression of the periastron advance k in t...

  3. [3]

    Therefore, to compute their averages it will suffice to do δχ → ⟨δχ⟩ 41 and δχ2 → δχ2 , which can be computed with Eq

    Precession averaged fully spinning spin-spin coefficients The precession averages for most of the PN coefficients given in Appendices C 1 and C 2 are straight-forward, since they are written in terms of δχ and δχ2. Therefore, to compute their averages it will suffice to do δχ → ⟨δχ⟩ 41 and δχ2 → δχ2 , which can be computed with Eq. (82) and Eq. (92) respe...

    1961

  4. [4]

    Substituting the definition of y, given in Eq. (43b), we can compute the time to coalescence in terms of the initial frequency and eccentricity as τc = 5 256 GMc c3 −5/3 πf GW,22 0 −8/3 (1 − e2 0)7/2F (e0) , (D8) where we have reintroduced the universal constants G and c and we have defined the chirp mass as Mc = ν3/5M = (m1m2)3/5 (m1 + m2)1/5 . (D9) Appe...

    2000

  5. [5]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA), KAGRA: 2.5 Generation In- terferometric Gravitational Wave Detector, Nature As- tron. 3, 35 (2019), arXiv:1811.08079 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 198 references
  1. [9]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr- qc]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Mandel and A

    I. Mandel and A. Farmer, Merging stellar-mass binary black holes, Phys. Rept. 955, 1 (2022), arXiv:1806.05820 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Mapelli, Formation channels of single and binary stellar-mass black holes, in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy , edited by C

    M. Mapelli, Formation channels of single and binary stellar-mass black holes, in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy , edited by C. Bambi, S. Katsanevas, and K. D. Kokkotas (Springer, Singapore, 2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Gerosa and M

    D. Gerosa and M. Fishbach, Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave sig- natures, Nature Astron. 5, 749 (2021), arXiv:2105.03439 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Mandel and F

    I. Mandel and F. S. Broekgaarden, Rates of compact object coalescences, Living Rev. Rel. 25, 1 (2022), arXiv:2107.14239 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Zevin, C. Pankow, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Illuminating Black Hole Binary Formation Channels with Spins in Advanced LIGO, Astrophys. J. Lett. 832, L2 (2016), arXiv:1609.05916 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gerosa, E

    D. Gerosa, E. Berti, R. O’Shaughnessy, K. Belczynski, M. Kesden, D. Wysocki, and W. Gladysz, Spin orien- tations of merging black holes formed from the evolu- tion of stellar binaries, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084036 (2018), arXiv:1808.02491 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Banerjee, A

    S. Banerjee, A. Olejak, and K. Belczynski, Symmetry Breaking in Merging Binary Black Holes from Young Massive Clusters and Isolated Binaries, Astrophys. J. 953, 80 (2023), arXiv:2302.10851 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Naoz, The eccentric kozai-lidov effect and its appli- cations, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 54, 441–489 (2016)

    S. Naoz, The eccentric kozai-lidov effect and its appli- cations, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 54, 441–489 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Samsing, Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters, Phys

    J. Samsing, Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Tagawa, B

    H. Tagawa, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, I. Bartos, K. Omukai, and J. Samsing, Eccentric Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei, Astrophys. J. Lett. 907, L20 (2021), arXiv:2010.10526 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Zevin, I

    M. Zevin, I. M. Romero-Shaw, K. Kremer, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, Implications of Eccentric Observa- tions on Binary Black Hole Formation Channels, Astro- phys. J. Lett. 921, L43 (2021), arXiv:2106.09042 [astro- ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gayathri, J

    V. Gayathri, J. Healy, J. Lange, B. O’Brien, M. Szczep- anczyk, I. Bartos, M. Campanelli, S. Klimenko, C. O. Lousto, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Eccentricity estimate for black hole mergers with numerical relativity simula- tions, Nature Astron. 6, 344 (2022), arXiv:2009.05461 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gamba, M

    R. Gamba, M. Breschi, G. Carullo, S. Albanesi, P. Ret- tegno, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, GW190521 as a dy- namical capture of two nonspinning black holes, Nature Astron. 7, 11 (2023), arXiv:2106.05575 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    I. M. Romero-Shaw, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Four Eccentric Mergers Increase the Evidence that LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA’s Binary Black Holes Form Dynamically, Astrophys. J. 940, 171 (2022), arXiv:2206.14695 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gupte et al

    N. Gupte et al. , Evidence for eccentricity in the pop- ulation of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo- KAGRA, (2024), arXiv:2404.14286 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Fumagalli and D

    G. Fumagalli and D. Gerosa, Spin-eccentricity interplay in merging binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124055 (2023), arXiv:2310.16893 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Fumagalli, I

    G. Fumagalli, I. Romero-Shaw, D. Gerosa, V. De Ren- zis, K. Kritos, and A. Olejak, Residual eccentricity as a systematic uncertainty on the formation channels of binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063012 (2024), arXiv:2405.14945 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    I. M. Romero-Shaw, D. Gerosa, and N. Loutrel, Eccen- tricity or spin precession? Distinguishing subdominant effects in gravitational-wave data, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc. 519, 5352 (2023), arXiv:2211.07528 [astro- ph.HE]

    2023

  22. [30]

    Chatziioannou, N

    K. Chatziioannou, N. Cornish, A. Klein, and N. Yunes, Detection and Parameter Estimation of Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Inspirals with Analytical Double-Precessing Templates, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104023 (2014), arXiv:1404.3180 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Pratten, P

    G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, R. Buscicchio, and L. M. Thomas, Measuring precession in asymmetric com- pact binaries, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043096 (2020), arXiv:2006.16153 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Favata, C

    M. Favata, C. Kim, K. G. Arun, J. Kim, and H. W. Lee, Constraining the orbital eccentricity of inspiralling compact binary systems with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023003 (2022), arXiv:2108.05861 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    McIsaac, C

    C. McIsaac, C. Hoy, and I. Harry, Search technique to observe precessing compact binary mergers in the ad- vanced detector era, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123016 (2023), arXiv:2303.17364 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    K. S. Phukon, P. Schmidt, and G. Pratten, Geomet- ric template bank for the detection of spinning low- mass compact binaries with moderate orbital eccentric- 50 ity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043040 (2025), arXiv:2412.06433 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gadre, K

    B. Gadre, K. Soni, S. Tiwari, A. Ramos-Buades, M. Haney, and S. Mitra, Detectability of eccentric bi- nary black holes with matched filtering and unmod- eled pipelines during the third observing run of LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044013 (2024), arXiv:2405.04186 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Schmidt et al

    S. Schmidt et al. , Searching for gravitational-wave signals from precessing black hole binaries with the GstLAL pipeline, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023038 (2024), arXiv:2403.17186 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Saini, M

    P. Saini, M. Favata, and K. G. Arun, Systematic bias on parametrized tests of general relativity due to neglect of orbital eccentricity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084031 (2022), arXiv:2203.04634 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Narayan, N

    P. Narayan, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, and A. Gupta, Effect of ignoring eccentricity in testing general relativ- ity with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064003 (2023), arXiv:2306.04068 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    M. A. Shaikh, S. A. Bhat, and S. J. Kapadia, A study of the inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency test with gravitational-wave signals from compact binaries in eccentric orbits, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024030 (2024), arXiv:2402.15110 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. A. Bhat, P. Saini, M. Favata, C. Gandevikar, C. K. Mishra, and K. G. Arun, Parametrized tests of general relativity using eccentric compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124062 (2024), arXiv:2408.14132 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Sesana, Black Hole Science With the Laser Inter- ferometer Space Antenna, Front

    A. Sesana, Black Hole Science With the Laser Inter- ferometer Space Antenna, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8, 601646 (2021), arXiv:2105.11518 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Amaro-Seoane et al

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel. 26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Colpi et al

    M. Colpi et al. (LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    J. M. Bardeen and J. A. Petterson, The Lense-Thirring Effect and Accretion Disks around Kerr Black Holes, Astrophys. J. Lett. 195, L65 (1975)

    1975

  37. [45]

    Bogdanovic, C

    T. Bogdanovic, C. S. Reynolds, and M. C. Miller, Alignment of the spins of supermassive black holes prior to merger, Astrophys. J. Lett. 661, L147 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703054

    2007 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Lense and H

    J. Lense and H. Thirring, Ueber den Einfluss der Eigen- rotation der Zentralkoerper auf die Bewegung der Plan- eten und Monde nach der Einsteinschen Gravitations- theorie, Phys. Z. 19, 156 (1918)

    1918

  39. [47]

    P. J. Armitage and P. Natarajan, Eccentricity of su- permassive black hole binaries coalescing from gas rich mergers, Astrophys. J. 634, 921 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0508493

    2005

  40. [48]

    A. I. Macfadyen and M. Milosavljevic, An Eccentric Circumbinary Accretion Disk and the Detection of Bi- nary Massive Black Holes, Astrophys. J.672, 83 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0607467

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Dotti, M

    M. Dotti, M. Colpi, F. Haardt, and L. Mayer, Massive black hole binaries in gaseous nuclear discs, Mem. Soc. Ast. It. 79, 1294 (2008), arXiv:0807.3626 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hayasaki, A new mechanism for massive binary black hole coalescences, Publ

    K. Hayasaki, A new mechanism for massive binary black hole coalescences, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 61, 65 (2009), arXiv:0805.3408 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Cuadra, P

    J. Cuadra, P. J. Armitage, R. D. Alexander, and M. C. Begelman, Massive black hole binary mergers within sub-pc scale gas discs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.393, 1423 (2009), arXiv:0809.0311 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Haiman, B

    Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, and K. Menou, The Population of Viscosity- and Gravitational Wave-driven Supermassive Black Hole Binaries Among Luminous Active Galactic Nuclei, Astrophys. J. 700, 1952 (2009), arXiv:0904.1383 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Zrake, C

    J. Zrake, C. Tiede, A. MacFadyen, and Z. Haiman, Equilibrium Eccentricity of Accreting Binaries, Astro- phys. J. Lett. 909, L13 (2021), arXiv:2010.09707 [astro- ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Boetzel, A

    Y. Boetzel, A. Susobhanan, A. Gopakumar, A. Klein, and P. Jetzer, Solving post-Newtonian accurate Ke- pler Equation, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044011 (2017), arXiv:1707.02088 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Moore and N

    B. Moore and N. Yunes, A 3PN Fourier Domain Waveform for Non-Spinning Binaries with Moderate Eccentricity, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 185003 (2019), arXiv:1903.05203 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Boetzel, C

    Y. Boetzel, C. K. Mishra, G. Faye, A. Gopakumar, and B. R. Iyer, Gravitational-wave amplitudes for compact binaries in eccentric orbits at the third post-Newtonian order: Tail contributions and postadiabatic corrections, Phys. Rev. D 100, 044018 (2019), arXiv:1904.11814 [gr- qc]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    G. Cho, S. Tanay, A. Gopakumar, and H. M. Lee, Gen- eralized quasi-Keplerian solution for eccentric, nonspin- ning compact binaries at 4PN order and the associated inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064010 (2022), arXiv:2110.09608 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Paul and C

    K. Paul and C. K. Mishra, Spin effects in spherical har- monic modes of gravitational waves from eccentric com- pact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024023 (2023), arXiv:2211.04155 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Henry and M

    Q. Henry and M. Khalil, Spin effects in gravitational waveforms and fluxes for binaries on eccentric orbits to the third post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104016 (2023), arXiv:2308.13606 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Sridhar, S

    O. Sridhar, S. Bhattacharyya, K. Paul, and C. K. Mishra, Spin effects in the phasing formula of eccentric compact binary inspirals till the third post-Newtonian order, (2024), arXiv:2412.10909 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Chiaramello and A

    D. Chiaramello and A. Nagar, Faithful analytical effective-one-body waveform model for spin-aligned, moderately eccentric, coalescing black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 101, 101501 (2020), arXiv:2001.11736 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Nagar, A

    A. Nagar, A. Bonino, and P. Rettegno, Effective one- body multipolar waveform model for spin-aligned, qua- sicircular, eccentric, hyperbolic black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104021 (2021), arXiv:2101.08624 [gr- qc]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Khalil, A

    M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, Radiation-reaction force and multipolar waveforms for eccentric, spin-aligned binaries in the effective-one- body formalism, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024046 (2021), arXiv:2104.11705 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, and S. Os- sokine, Effective-one-body multipolar waveforms for ec- centric binary black holes with nonprecessing spins, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044035 (2022), arXiv:2112.06952 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Albanesi, A

    S. Albanesi, A. Placidi, A. Nagar, M. Orselli, and S. Bernuzzi, New avenue for accurate analytical wave- 51 forms and fluxes for eccentric compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 105, L121503 (2022), arXiv:2203.16286 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Albanesi, A

    S. Albanesi, A. Nagar, S. Bernuzzi, A. Placidi, and M. Orselli, Assessment of effective-one-body radiation reactions for generic planar orbits, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104031 (2022), arXiv:2202.10063 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Placidi, S

    A. Placidi, S. Albanesi, A. Nagar, M. Orselli, S. Bernuzzi, and G. Grignani, Exploiting Newton- factorized, 2PN-accurate waveform multipoles in effective-one-body models for spin-aligned noncircu- larized binaries, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104030 (2022), arXiv:2112.05448 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Nagar, D

    A. Nagar, D. Chiaramello, R. Gamba, S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, V. Fantini, M. Panzeri, and P. Rettegno, Effective-one-body waveform model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries. II. High accuracy by improving logarithmic terms in resummations, Phys. Rev. D ...

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Nagar, R

    A. Nagar, R. Gamba, P. Rettegno, V. Fantini, and S. Bernuzzi, Effective-one-body waveform model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries: The importance of radiation reaction, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084001 (2024), arXiv:2404.05288 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Gamboa, M

    A. Gamboa, M. Khalil, and A. Buonanno, Third post- Newtonian dynamics for eccentric orbits and aligned spins in the effective-one-body waveform model SEOB- NRv5EHM, (2024), arXiv:2412.12831 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Gamboa et al

    A. Gamboa et al. , Accurate waveforms for eccen- tric, aligned-spin binary black holes: The multipo- lar effective-one-body model SEOBNRv5EHM, (2024), arXiv:2412.12823 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Islam, V

    T. Islam, V. Varma, J. Lodman, S. E. Field, G. Khanna, M. A. Scheel, H. P. Pfeiffer, D. Gerosa, and L. E. Kid- der, Eccentric binary black hole surrogate models for the gravitational waveform and remnant properties: compa- rable mass, nonspinning case, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064022...

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    K. Paul, A. Maurya, Q. Henry, K. Sharma, P. Satheesh, Divyajyoti, P. Kumar, and C. K. Mishra, ESIGMAHM: An Eccentric, Spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown wave- form model with Higher Modes for the detection and characterization of binary black holes, (2024), arXiv:2409.13866 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Csizmadia, G

    P. Csizmadia, G. Debreczeni, I. Racz, and M. Vasuth, Gravitational waves from spinning eccentric binaries, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 245002 (2012), arXiv:1207.0001 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Ireland, O

    B. Ireland, O. Birnholtz, H. Nakano, E. West, and M. Campanelli, Eccentric Binary Black Holes with Spin via the Direct Integration of the Post-Newtonian Equa- tions of Motion, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024015 (2019), arXiv:1904.03443 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Phys

    M. van de Meent, Gravitational self-force on generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1711.09607 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Klein and P

    A. Klein and P. Jetzer, Spin effects in the phasing of gravitational waves from binaries on eccentric orbits, Phys. Rev. D 81, 124001 (2010), arXiv:1005.2046 [gr- qc]

    2010 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Klein, Y

    A. Klein, Y. Boetzel, A. Gopakumar, P. Jetzer, and L. de Vittori, Fourier domain gravitational waveforms for precessing eccentric binaries, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104043 (2018), arXiv:1801.08542 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Klein, EFPE: Efficient fully precessing eccentric gravitational waveforms for binaries with long inspirals, (2021), arXiv:2106.10291 [gr-qc]

    A. Klein, EFPE: Efficient fully precessing eccentric gravitational waveforms for binaries with long inspirals, (2021), arXiv:2106.10291 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    J. N. Arredondo, A. Klein, and N. Yunes, Efficient gravitational-wave model for fully-precessing and mod- erately eccentric, compact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044044 (2024), arXiv:2402.06804 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    X. Liu, Z. Cao, and Z.-H. Zhu, Effective-one-body numerical-relativity waveform model for eccentric spin- precessing binary black hole coalescence, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 195019 (2024), arXiv:2310.04552 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Gamba, D

    R. Gamba, D. Chiaramello, and S. Neogi, Toward efficient effective-one-body models for generic, non- planar orbits, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024031 (2024), arXiv:2404.15408 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathemati- cal Methods for Scientists and Engineers 1: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory (Springer, New York, 1999)

    1999

  76. [84]

    Klein, N

    A. Klein, N. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Gravitational wave- forms for precessing, quasicircular binaries via multi- ple scale analysis and uniform asymptotics: The near spin alignment case, Phys. Rev. D 88, 124015 (2013), arXiv:1305.1932 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Chatziioannou, A

    K. Chatziioannou, A. Klein, N. Yunes, and N. Cor- nish, Gravitational Waveforms for Precessing, Quasicir- cular Compact Binaries with Multiple Scale Analysis: Small Spin Expansion, Phys. Rev. D 88, 063011 (2013), arXiv:1307.4418 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Kesden, D

    M. Kesden, D. Gerosa, R. O’Shaughnessy, E. Berti, and U. Sperhake, Effective potentials and morphological transitions for binary black-hole spin precession, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 081103 (2015), arXiv:1411.0674 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Gerosa, M

    D. Gerosa, M. Kesden, U. Sperhake, E. Berti, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Multi-timescale analysis of phase transitions in precessing black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 92, 064016 (2015), arXiv:1506.03492 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Chatziioannou, A

    K. Chatziioannou, A. Klein, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish, Constructing Gravitational Waves from Generic Spin- Precessing Compact Binary Inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104004 (2017), arXiv:1703.03967 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Gerosa, G

    D. Gerosa, G. Fumagalli, M. Mould, G. Cavallotto, D. P. Monroy, D. Gangardt, and V. De Renzis, Efficient multi-timescale dynamics of precessing black-hole bina- ries, Phys. Rev. D108, 024042 (2023), arXiv:2304.04801 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, pyefpe code repository (2025)

    2025

  83. [91]

    Klein, N

    A. Klein, N. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Fast Frequency- domain Waveforms for Spin-Precessing Binary Inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124029 (2014), arXiv:1408.5158 [gr- qc]

    2014 arXiv

  84. [92]

    C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun, and B. R. Iyer, Third post- Newtonian gravitational waveforms for compact binary systems in general orbits: Instantaneous terms, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084040 (2015), arXiv:1501.07096 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Schmidt, M

    P. Schmidt, M. Hannam, S. Husa, and P. Ajith, Tracking the precession of compact binaries from their gravitational-wave signal, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024046 (2011), arXiv:1012.2879 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  86. [94]

    O’Shaughnessy, B

    R. O’Shaughnessy, B. Vaishnav, J. Healy, Z. Meeks, and D. Shoemaker, Efficient asymptotic frame selection for binary black hole spacetimes using asymptotic radia- tion, Phys. Rev. D 84, 124002 (2011), arXiv:1109.5224 [gr-qc]. 52

    2011 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Boyle, R

    M. Boyle, R. Owen, and H. P. Pfeiffer, A geometric approach to the precession of compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 84, 124011 (2011), arXiv:1110.2965 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Schmidt, M

    P. Schmidt, M. Hannam, and S. Husa, Towards mod- els of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: A simple approximate mapping between precessing and non-precessing inspiral signals, Phys. Rev. D 86, 104063 (2012), arXiv:1207.3088 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, General relativistic celes- tial mechanics of binary systems. i. the post-newtonian motion, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Phys. Th´ eor.43, 107 (1985)

    1985

  90. [98]

    Colwell, Solving Kepler’s Equation over Three Cen- turies (Willmann-Bell, 1993)

    P. Colwell, Solving Kepler’s Equation over Three Cen- turies (Willmann-Bell, 1993)

    1993

  91. [99]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Schaefer, Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars, Nuovo Cim. B 101, 127 (1988)

    1988

  92. [100]

    Sch¨ afer and N

    G. Sch¨ afer and N. Wex, Second post-Newtonian motion of compact binaries, Phys. Lett. A 174, 196 (1993), pro- vided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System

    1993

  93. [101]

    Wex, The second post-Newtonian motion of compact binary-star systems with spin, Class

    N. Wex, The second post-Newtonian motion of compact binary-star systems with spin, Class. Quant. Grav. 12, 983 (1995)

    1995

  94. [102]

    Memmesheimer, A

    R.-M. Memmesheimer, A. Gopakumar, and G. Schae- fer, Third post-Newtonian accurate generalized quasi- Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in ec- centric orbits, Phys. Rev. D70, 104011 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0407049

    2004

  95. [103]

    Damour, A

    T. Damour, A. Gopakumar, and B. R. Iyer, Phasing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064028 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404128

    2004 arXiv

  96. [104]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qu- sailah, Tail effects in the 3PN gravitational wave energy flux of compact binaries in quasi-elliptical orbits, Phys. Rev. D 77, 064034 (2008), arXiv:0711.0250 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  97. [105]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299 (1980)

    1980

  98. [106]

    L. E. Kidder, Using full information when computing modes of post-Newtonian waveforms from inspiralling compact binaries in circular orbit, Phys. Rev. D 77, 044016 (2008), arXiv:0710.0614 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  99. [107]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell, Gravitational Two-Body Problem with Arbitrary Masses, Spins, and Quadrupole Moments, Phys. Rev. D 12, 329 (1975)

    1975

  100. [108]

    T. A. Apostolatos, C. Cutler, G. J. Sussman, and K. S. Thorne, Spin-induced orbital precession and its modu- lation of the gravitational waveforms from merging bi- naries, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6274 (1994)

    1994

  101. [109]

    Boyle, L

    M. Boyle, L. E. Kidder, S. Ossokine, and H. P. Pfeif- fer, Gravitational-wave modes from precessing black- hole binaries, (2014), arXiv:1409.4431 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Ramos-Buades, P

    A. Ramos-Buades, P. Schmidt, G. Pratten, and S. Husa, Validity of common modeling approximations for pre- cessing binary black holes with higher-order modes, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103014 (2020), arXiv:2001.10936 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Buonanno, Y.-b

    A. Buonanno, Y.-b. Chen, and M. Vallisneri, Detect- ing gravitational waves from precessing binaries of spin- ning compact objects: Adiabatic limit, Phys. Rev. D 67, 104025 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 74, 029904 (2006)], arXiv:gr-qc/0211087

    2003 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathemat- ical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover Publications, Incorporated, 1974)

    1974

  105. [113]

    D. E. Amos, Algorithm 644: A portable package for bessel functions of a complex argument and nonnegative order, ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 12, 265–273 (1986)

    1986

  106. [114]

    Virtanen et al

    P. Virtanen et al. , SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods 17, 261 (2020)

    2020

  107. [115]

    Colleoni, F

    M. Colleoni, F. A. R. Vidal, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, T. Dietrich, M. Haney, and G. Pratten, IMRPhe- nomXP NRTidalv2: An improved frequency-domain precessing binary neutron star waveform model, (2023), arXiv:2311.15978 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  108. [116]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell, The gravitational interaction: spin, rotation, and quantum effects - a review., General Relativity and Gravitation 11, 149 (1979)

    1979

  109. [117]

    Damour, Coalescence of two spinning black holes: an effective one-body approach, Phys

    T. Damour, Coalescence of two spinning black holes: an effective one-body approach, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124013 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103018

    2001 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Racine, Analysis of spin precession in binary black hole systems including quadrupole-monopole interac- tion, Phys

    E. Racine, Analysis of spin precession in binary black hole systems including quadrupole-monopole interac- tion, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044021 (2008), arXiv:0803.1820 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Ajith et al

    P. Ajith et al. , Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241101 (2011), arXiv:0909.2867 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Schmidt, I

    P. Schmidt, I. W. Harry, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Nu- merical Relativity Injection Infrastructure, (2017), arXiv:1703.01076 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Ebersold, Y

    M. Ebersold, Y. Boetzel, G. Faye, C. K. Mishra, B. R. Iyer, and P. Jetzer, Gravitational-wave amplitudes for compact binaries in eccentric orbits at the third post- Newtonian order: Memory contributions, Phys. Rev. D 100, 084043 (2019), arXiv:1906.06263 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Cutler et al., The Last three minutes: issues in grav- itational wave measurements of coalescing compact bi- naries, Phys

    C. Cutler et al., The Last three minutes: issues in grav- itational wave measurements of coalescing compact bi- naries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2984 (1993), arXiv:astro- ph/9208005

    1993

  115. [123]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery,Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  116. [124]

    F. J. Harris, On the use of windows for harmonic anal- ysis with the discrete fourier transform, Proceedings of the IEEE 66, 51 (1978)

    1978

  117. [125]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), A guide to LIGO–Virgo detector noise and extraction of tran- sient gravitational-wave signals, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 055002 (2020), arXiv:1908.11170 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Talbot, E

    C. Talbot, E. Thrane, S. Biscoveanu, and R. Smith, In- ference with finite time series: Observing the gravita- tional Universe through windows, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043049 (2021), arXiv:2106.13785 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  119. [127]

    B. S. Sathyaprakash and S. V. Dhurandhar, Choice of filters for the detection of gravitational waves from co- alescing binaries, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3819 (1991)

    1991

  120. [128]

    Cutler and E

    C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral wave form?, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9402014

    1994

  121. [129]

    S. Droz, D. J. Knapp, E. Poisson, and B. J. Owen, Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Validity of the stationary phase approximation to the Fourier transform, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124016 (1999), 53 arXiv:gr-qc/9901076

    1999 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Dormand and P

    J. Dormand and P. Prince, A family of embedded runge- kutta formulae, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 6, 19 (1980)

    1980

  123. [131]

    L. F. Shampine, Some practical runge-kutta formulas, Mathematics of Computation 46, 135 (1986)

    1986

  124. [132]

    Pratten et al

    G. Pratten et al. , Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of pre- cessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estell´ es, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, Next generation of accurate and ef- ficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124037 (2023), arXiv:...

    2023 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Varma, S

    V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole sim- ulations with unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Research. 1, 033015 (2019), arXiv:1905.09300 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Cabero, A

    M. Cabero, A. B. Nielsen, A. P. Lundgren, and C. D. Capano, Minimum energy and the end of the inspiral in the post-Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064016 (2017), arXiv:1602.03134 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  128. [136]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Ro- tating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation, Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1972)

    1972

  129. [137]

    X. Zhao, M. Kesden, and D. Gerosa, Nutational reso- nances, transitional precession, and precession-averaged evolution in binary black-hole systems, Phys. Rev. D96, 024007 (2017), arXiv:1705.02369 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  130. [138]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO Algorithm Li- brary - LALSuite, free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  131. [139]

    Schmidt, F

    P. Schmidt, F. Ohme, and M. Hannam, Towards mod- els of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries II: Modelling precession effects with a single effective pre- cession parameter, Phys. Rev. D 91, 024043 (2015), arXiv:1408.1810 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Gerosa, M

    D. Gerosa, M. Mould, D. Gangardt, P. Schmidt, G. Pratten, and L. M. Thomas, A generalized preces- sion parameter χp to interpret gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064067 (2021), arXiv:2011.11948 [gr- qc]

    2021 arXiv

  133. [141]

    L. N. Trefethen, Approximation Theory and Approxi- mation Practice, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 128 (SIAM, 2013) p. 318

    2013

  134. [142]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Prospects for observing and localiz- ing gravitational-wave transients with advanced LIGO, advanced virgo and KAGRA, Living Reviews in Rela- tivity 23, 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 (2020)

    2020 doi

  135. [143]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Noise curves used for Simulations in the update of the Observing Scenarios Paper , Tech. Rep. LIGO-T2000012 (LIGO Virgo KAGRA Collaboration, 2020)

    2020

  136. [144]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963)

    1963

  137. [145]

    L. S. Finn and D. F. Chernoff, Observing binary inspi- ral in gravitational radiation: One interferometer, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2198 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9301003

    1993 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Harry, S

    I. Harry, S. Privitera, A. Boh´ e, and A. Buonanno, Searching for Gravitational Waves from Compact Bi- naries with Precessing Spins, Phys. Rev. D 94, 024012 (2016), arXiv:1603.02444 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Talbot and E

    C. Talbot and E. Thrane, Measuring the binary black hole mass spectrum with an astrophysically moti- vated parameterization, Astrophys. J. 856, 173 (2018), arXiv:1801.02699 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Buonanno, B

    A. Buonanno, B. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084043 (2009), arXiv:0907.0700 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Sturani, Note on the derivation of the angular mo- mentum and spin precessing equations in SpinTaylor codes (2015)

    R. Sturani, Note on the derivation of the angular mo- mentum and spin precessing equations in SpinTaylor codes (2015)

    2015

  142. [150]

    Isoyama, R

    S. Isoyama, R. Sturani, and H. Nakano, Post-Newtonian templates for gravitational waves from compact bi- nary inspirals 10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7 31-1 (2020), arXiv:2012.01350 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Gerosa, M

    D. Gerosa, M. Kesden, R. O’Shaughnessy, A. Klein, E. Berti, U. Sperhake, and D. Trifir` o, Precessional in- stability in binary black holes with aligned spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 141102 (2015), arXiv:1506.09116 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Varma, M

    V. Varma, M. Mould, D. Gerosa, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Up-down instability of binary black holes in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064003 (2021), arXiv:2012.07147 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Pratten, S

    G. Pratten, S. Husa, C. Garcia-Quiros, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estelles, and R. Jaume, Setting the cornerstone for a family of models for gravitational waves from compact binaries: The dominant harmonic for nonprecessing quasicircular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 06...

    2020 arXiv

  146. [154]

    A. H. Nitz, A. Lundgren, D. A. Brown, E. Ochsner, D. Keppel, and I. W. Harry, Accuracy of gravitational waveform models for observing neutron-star–black-hole binaries in Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 88, 124039 (2013), arXiv:1307.1757 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Kumar, K

    P. Kumar, K. Barkett, S. Bhagwat, N. Afshari, D. A. Brown, G. Lovelace, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szil´ agyi, Ac- curacy and precision of gravitational-wave models of inspiraling neutron star-black hole binaries with spin: Comparison with matter-free numerical relativity in the low...

    2015 arXiv

  148. [156]

    P¨ urrer and C.-J

    M. P¨ urrer and C.-J. Haster, Gravitational waveform ac- curacy requirements for future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023151 (2020), arXiv:1912.10055 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Maggiore et al

    M. Maggiore et al. (ET), Science Case for the Ein- stein Telescope, JCAP 03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro- ph.CO]

    1912 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Branchesi et al

    M. Branchesi et al. , Science with the Einstein Tele- scope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP 07, 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  151. [159]

    Reitze et al

    D. Reitze et al. , Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribu- tion to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Boh´ eet al

    A. Boh´ eet al. , Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detec- tors, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044028 (2017), arXiv:1611.03703 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Boyle et al., The SXS Collaboration catalog of binary 54 black hole simulations, Class

    M. Boyle et al., The SXS Collaboration catalog of binary 54 black hole simulations, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 195006 (2019), arXiv:1904.04831 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Moore, M

    B. Moore, M. Favata, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Gravitational-wave phasing for low-eccentricity inspi- ralling compact binaries to 3PN order, Phys. Rev. D 93, 124061 (2016), arXiv:1605.00304 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  155. [163]

    S. A. Usman et al., The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 215004 (2016), arXiv:1508.02357 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Zackay, T

    B. Zackay, T. Venumadhav, J. Roulet, L. Dai, and M. Zaldarriaga, Detecting gravitational waves in data with non-stationary and non-Gaussian noise, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063034 (2021), arXiv:1908.05644 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  157. [165]

    Aubin et al., The MBTA pipeline for detecting com- pact binary coalescences in the third LIGO–Virgo ob- serving run, Class

    F. Aubin et al., The MBTA pipeline for detecting com- pact binary coalescences in the third LIGO–Virgo ob- serving run, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 095004 (2021), arXiv:2012.11512 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  158. [166]

    A. H. Nitz, S. Kumar, Y.-F. Wang, S. Kastha, S. Wu, M. Sch¨ afer, R. Dhurkunde, and C. D. Capano, 4- OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Com- pact Binary Mergers, Astrophys. J. 946, 59 (2023), arXiv:2112.06878 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Sakon et al., Template bank for compact binary merg- ers in the fourth observing run of Advanced LIGO, Ad- vanced Virgo, and KAGRA, Phys

    S. Sakon et al., Template bank for compact binary merg- ers in the fourth observing run of Advanced LIGO, Ad- vanced Virgo, and KAGRA, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044066 (2024), arXiv:2211.16674 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Klimenko, I

    S. Klimenko, I. Yakushin, A. Mercer, and G. Mitsel- makher, Coherent method for detection of gravitational wave bursts, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 114029 (2008), arXiv:0802.3232 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Lynch, S

    R. Lynch, S. Vitale, R. Essick, E. Katsavounidis, and F. Robinet, Information-theoretic approach to the gravitational-wave burst detection problem, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104046 (2017), arXiv:1511.05955 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Drago et al

    M. Drago et al. , Coherent WaveBurst, a pipeline for unmodeled gravitational-wave data analysis 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100678 (2020), arXiv:2006.12604 [gr-qc]

    2020

  163. [171]

    Bayes, Rev., An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances, Phil

    T. Bayes, Rev., An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 53, 370 (1764)

  164. [172]

    Veitch et al., Parameter estimation for compact bina- ries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library, Phys

    J. Veitch et al., Parameter estimation for compact bina- ries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library, Phys. Rev. D 91, 042003 (2015), arXiv:1409.7215 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  165. [173]

    Thrane and C

    E. Thrane and C. Talbot, An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: parame- ter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical mod- els, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 36, e010 (2019), [Er- ratum: Publ.Astron.Soc.Austral. 37, e036 (2020)], arXiv:1809.02...

    2019 arXiv

  166. [174]

    R. E. Kass and A. E. Raftery, Bayes factors, Journal of the american statistical association 90, 773 (1995)

    1995

  167. [175]

    Ashton et al

    G. Ashton et al. , BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian in- ference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astro- phys. J. Suppl. 241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro- ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  168. [176]

    R. J. E. Smith, G. Ashton, A. Vajpeyi, and C. Tal- bot, Massively parallel Bayesian inference for transient gravitational-wave astronomy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 498, 4492 (2020), arXiv:1909.11873 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  169. [177]

    I. M. Romero-Shaw et al. , Bayesian inference for com- pact binary coalescences with bilby: validation and ap- plication to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295 (2020), arXiv:2006.00714 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  170. [178]

    J. S. Speagle, DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evi- dences, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132 (2020), arXiv:1904.02180 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  171. [179]

    C. L. Rodriguez, B. Farr, V. Raymond, W. M. Farr, T. B. Littenberg, D. Fazi, and V. Kalogera, Basic Pa- rameter Estimation of Binary Neutron Star Systems by the Advanced LIGO/Virgo Network, Astrophys. J.784, 119 (2014), arXiv:1309.3273 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  172. [180]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck), Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Chatziioannou, N

    K. Chatziioannou, N. Cornish, A. Klein, and N. Yunes, Spin-Precession: Breaking the Black Hole–Neutron Star Degeneracy, Astrophys. J. Lett. 798, L17 (2015), arXiv:1402.3581 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Roebber et al

    E. Roebber et al. , Milky Way Satellites Shining Bright in Gravitational Waves, Astrophys. J. Lett. 894, L15 (2020), arXiv:2002.10465 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  175. [183]

    Buscicchio, A

    R. Buscicchio, A. Klein, E. Roebber, C. J. Moore, D. Gerosa, E. Finch, and A. Vecchio, Bayesian pa- rameter estimation of stellar-mass black-hole bina- ries with LISA, Phys. Rev. D 104, 044065 (2021), arXiv:2106.05259 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  176. [184]

    Klein et al

    A. Klein et al. , The last three years: multiband gravitational-wave observations of stellar-mass binary black holes, (2022), arXiv:2204.03423 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Pratten, P

    G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, H. Middleton, and A. Vec- chio, Precision tracking of massive black hole spin evo- lution with LISA, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124045 (2023), arXiv:2307.13026 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Buscicchio, J

    R. Buscicchio, J. Torrado, C. Caprini, G. Nardini, N. Karnesis, M. Pieroni, and A. Sesana, Stellar-mass black-hole binaries in LISA: characteristics and com- plementarity with current-generation interferometers, JCAP 01, 084, arXiv:2410.18171 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  179. [187]

    Ghosh, P

    S. Ghosh, P. Kolitsidou, and M. Hannam, First frequency-domain phenomenological model of the mul- tipole asymmetry in gravitational-wave signals from binary-black-hole coalescence, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024061 (2024), arXiv:2310.16980 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  180. [188]

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detec- tors, Phys. Rev. D 77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  181. [189]

    H. Yang, W. E. East, V. Paschalidis, F. Pretorius, and R. F. P. Mendes, Evolution of Highly Eccentric Binary Neutron Stars Including Tidal Effects, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044007 (2018), arXiv:1806.00158 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  182. [190]

    Schmidt and T

    P. Schmidt and T. Hinderer, Frequency domain model of f -mode dynamic tides in gravitational waveforms from compact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 100, 021501 (2019), arXiv:1905.00818 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  183. [191]

    LaHaye, H

    M. LaHaye, H. Yang, B. Bonga, and Z. Lyu, Effi- cient fully precessing gravitational waveforms for bi- naries with neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043018 (2023), arXiv:2212.04657 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  184. [192]

    Dones, Q

    E. Dones, Q. Henry, and L. Bernard, Tidal contributions to the full gravitational waveform to the second-and-a- half post-Newtonian order, (2024), arXiv:2412.14249 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  185. [193]

    Jaranowski and A

    P. Jaranowski and A. Krolak, Gravitational-Wave 55 Data Analysis. Formalism and Sample Applications: The Gaussian Case, Living Rev. Rel. 8, 3 (2005), arXiv:0711.1115 [gr-qc]

    2005 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Morras, J

    G. Morras, J. F. N. Siles, and J. Garcia-Bellido, Effi- cient reduced order quadrature construction algorithms for fast gravitational wave inference, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123025 (2023), arXiv:2307.16610 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  187. [195]

    Tulczyjew, Equations of motion of rotating bodies in general relativity theory, Acta Phys

    W. Tulczyjew, Equations of motion of rotating bodies in general relativity theory, Acta Phys. Polon. 18, 37 (1959), [Erratum: Acta Phys. Polon. 18, 534 (1959)]

    1959

  188. [196]

    W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. I. Momentum and angular momentum, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 314, 499 (1970)

    1970

  189. [197]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and S. Sinha, Third post-Newtonian angular momentum flux and the secular evolution of orbital elements for inspiralling compact bi- naries in quasi-elliptical orbits, Phys. Rev. D80, 124018 (2009), arXiv:0908.3854 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  190. [198]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments, Oxford Master Series in Physics (Oxford University Press, 2007) p. 572

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.