Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 129 references

The Role of Integrity Monitoring in Connected and Automated Vehicles: Current State-of-Practice and Future Directions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that integrity monitoring for cooperative V2X-based positioning is almost non-existent, and maps the standards and datasets needed to build it.

desk verdict Useful survey of integrity monitoring for CAVs with a genuinely new cooperative/V2X angle, but the headline 'almost non-existent' gap claim rests on an undocumented corpus. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04874 v3 pith:VD36IYCO submitted 2025-02-07 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

Saswat Priyadarshi Nayak , Matthew Barth This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords integritymonitoringconnectedandautomatedvehiclescooperativepositioningV2XcommunicationRequiredNavigationPerformanceautonomousdrivingsafetydatasetsfaultdetectionexclusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a review that sets out to show a specific gap: vehicle positioning systems that combine GNSS with onboard sensors have a mature integrity-monitoring toolbox, but cooperative positioning that fuses perception data shared over vehicle-to-vehicle or vehicle-to-infrastructure links has essentially no integrity monitoring at all. It surveys four families of integrity techniques—RAIM-style residual tests, Kalman-filter residuals, model/coherence cross-checks, and set-theoretic bounded-error methods—and maps them against automotive safety standards and public V2X datasets. The conclusion is that V2X perception datasets are plentiful but built for 3D detection, tracking, and trajectory forecasting, not for benchmarking trust in shared position information. A sympathetic reader would take the paper's contribution to be a well-scoped gap analysis that turns "we should do cooperative integrity monitoring" into a concrete agenda: define RNP parameters for cooperative positioning, run sensitivity analyses in mixed traffic, inject faults into V2X data, and benchmark against existing datasets.

What carries the argument

The organizing machinery is the Required Navigation Performance (RNP) framework—accuracy, availability, continuity, and integrity risk—with protection level (PL) as a bound on position error and alert limit (AL) as the tolerable error threshold, visualized by the Stanford-ESA integrity diagram. The paper uses this framework to classify every surveyed method's output into nominal, unavailable, misleading, or hazardously misleading states, and it builds the gap argument by showing that cooperative perception-based positioning has no equivalent PL/AL treatment.

What would settle it

A single peer-reviewed study that implements a functioning integrity monitor for V2V/V2I shared-perception positioning—computing protection levels, alert limits, and integrity risk on a real-world V2X dataset—would contradict the paper's central claim that such integrity evaluation is almost non-existent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that integrity evaluation for cooperative positioning solutions built on V2V- and V2I-shared perception data is almost non-existent, despite the abundance of perception-oriented V2X datasets. Existing cooperative work uses external information such as DSRC range measurements, signals of opportunity, or UWB ranging mainly to reduce GNSS errors, not to certify the trustworthiness of shared perception itself. The paper further finds that the public V2X datasets it reviews are designed primarily for 3D detection, tracking, and trajectory forecasting, so they lack the fault-injection and ground-truth error structure needed to benchmark integrity.

Load-bearing premise

The gap claim depends on the reviewed papers, standards, and datasets being representative of the whole field, but the paper gives no systematic search protocol to show that they are.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the gap is real, safety-critical CAV applications that rely on shared perception cannot currently certify a bound on position error, so they should be treated as unproven until an integrity layer exists.
  • Existing V2X datasets would need to be extended or re-annotated with fault injections, communication-loss episodes, and ground-truth error labels before they can serve as integrity benchmarks.
  • Standards bodies would need to add RNP-style integrity requirements to cooperative-perception message standards rather than only defining message formats and communication performance.
  • The research priority shifts from improving detection accuracy to quantifying protection levels, alert limits, time-to-alert, and integrity risk for cooperative positioning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One implication the paper leaves implicit is that most V2X datasets, as released, are not ready-made integrity benchmarks because they were collected for perception accuracy rather than for measuring how errors propagate through shared fusion.
  • A natural testable extension is to adapt RAIM-style residual tests to cooperative perception by treating shared feature associations or V2V range measurements as pseudorange-like observables, then computing protection levels on existing datasets.
  • Another implication for deployment is that without a single agreed RNP definition, different OEMs could certify different safety claims for the same cooperative maneuver, which the paper's standardization call implicitly warns against.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper surveys integrity monitoring (IM) for vehicle positioning in connected and automated vehicles (CAVs), covering both standalone and cooperative approaches. It reviews IM techniques (RAIM, Kalman-filter residuals, coherence-based methods, set-theoretic methods), automotive safety standards, and public V2X datasets. The central claim, stated in the conclusion, is that integrity evaluation for cooperative positioning solutions involving V2V- and V2I-based perception sensors is 'almost non-existent,' even though abundant V2X perception datasets exist. The paper then proposes future directions including sensitivity analysis, fault injection, RNP standardization, and benchmarking IM algorithms on V2X datasets.

Significance. If the central gap claim is reliable, the paper identifies a genuinely under-addressed area: integrity monitoring for cooperative perception data shared over V2X. The paper usefully organizes a broad literature (standalone and cooperative IM, standards such as ISO 26262/ISO 21448, SAE J2945, ETSI ITS-G5) and compiles recent V2X datasets in a single table. Its concrete suggestions for future work—sensitivity analyses, fault injection, and RNP chart development—are reasonable and potentially valuable to the community. However, the significance of the survey hinges on the trustworthiness of the gap analysis, which is currently weakened by the absence of a systematic review methodology.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section VII (Conclusions); Section VI (Research Gaps)] The central claim that cooperative IM for V2X perception is 'almost non-existent' is a strong negative existential assertion about the literature, but the paper reports no systematic search protocol: no databases queried, no keyword set, no date range, no inclusion/exclusion criteria. Without such a protocol, the claimed gap could be an artifact of the search rather than a property of the field. The paper should either provide a reproducible search methodology or substantially soften the claim to match the evidence it actually presents, which in Section III-C is described as 'limited' rather than 'almost non-existent.'
  2. [Section III-C (Cooperative Integrity Monitoring); Section VII] The definition of 'cooperative integrity monitoring' shifts between the body and the conclusion. Section III-C discusses cooperative IM works that are not based on V2X perception-data sharing (e.g., Xiong et al. [49] on GNSS/UWB, Ansari [34] on DSRC relative positioning, Liu et al. [47] on hybrid RAIM), while the conclusion narrows the claim to 'V2V and V2I-based perception sensors.' The paper should explicitly define the scope (integrity risk evaluation for shared perception data) and then map each surveyed work to that definition, so that the reader can verify where the gap actually lies rather than infer it from an undefined term.
  3. [Section V and Table VI (V2X Datasets)] The paper asserts that V2X perception datasets are 'available in abundance' and can be used for integrity benchmarking, but Table VI shows that most listed datasets have 'N.A.' for V2X communication protocol, and the text itself acknowledges these datasets were collected without active V2X communication and are designed for 3D detection, tracking, and trajectory forecasting. The suitability of these datasets for cooperative-IM benchmarking is therefore asserted, not demonstrated. The paper should either explain how such datasets can be repurposed (e.g., by imposing communication constraints in post-processing, as it briefly suggests) or restrict the claim to the few datasets that include active V2X communication (e.g., Berlin-V2X, V2AIX, TiHAN-V2X).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV (Automotive Safety Standards)] The standard number 'ISO 21488' appears to be an error: the Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) standard is ISO 21448. The sentence should be corrected and the later reference to ISO 21448 harmonized.
  2. [Throughout] Figure references are inconsistent, e.g., 'fig1', 'fig2', 'fig3' instead of 'Fig. 1', 'Fig. 2', 'Fig. 3'; the captions in the text should follow a consistent style.
  3. [Section IV] There is a typo 'Artifical Intelligence' in the discussion of AI-based safety frameworks; it should read 'Artificial Intelligence.'
  4. [Section II and Section IV] The citations [2] and [13] are referred to as 'Nigel et al.' but the authors are Williams and Barth (or Williams et al.); the in-text names should match the reference list.
  5. [Section IV (SAE J2735)] The message 'Signal Phase and Timing' is misspelled as 'Singal Phase and Timing'; also 'DRSC' in the J2945/9 discussion should be 'DSRC.'
  6. [Section V, Table VI] The dataset name is written inconsistently as 'TIHAN-V2X' in the text and 'TiHAN-V2X' in the table; please unify the spelling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Minor self-citation, no circular derivation: the survey's gap claim is external and not forced by its inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a literature review and gap analysis, not a derivation of quantitative results. Its central claim, stated in Section VII, is that 'The integrity evaluation for cooperative positioning solutions involving V2V and V2I-based perception sensors are almost non-existent, even if various perception data-based V2X datasets are available in abundance.' That claim is an assessment of the surveyed literature rather than an output derived from fitted parameters or prior results of the authors. The only self-referential content is a small cluster of the authors' own prior papers, references [52]-[54], used to support the uncontroversial statement that sharing perception data via V2V/V2I 'has proven to enhance the detection of surrounding vehicles and improve localization performance.' These citations are illustrative, not load-bearing: the survey's gap claim would stand without them, and the related cooperative IM examples in Section III-C come from independent groups (e.g., Xiong et al. [49], Schoen et al. [50], Liu et al. [47]). No equation in the paper is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction; the technical content on RAIM, Kalman residual methods, model-based integrity, and set-theoretic methods is standard textbook material. The paper does have a genuine weakness: it reports no systematic search protocol, and its negative-existential claim could conceivably be an artifact of the chosen corpus. However, that is a methodology/correctness concern, not circularity. There is no constructed equivalence between the paper's conclusions and its assumptions, and no self-citation chain that forces the outcome. Consistent with the reviewer guidance, 'This is not standard consensus' or an undocumented literature search is not a circularity argument. The appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a minor self-citation note that does not raise the score above 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its conclusions rest on the representativeness of the selected literature and datasets, and on the accuracy of cited quantitative results. Two domain assumptions capture that dependence.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The surveyed literature and V2X datasets are a representative sample of the state of the art in integrity monitoring.
    Invoked implicitly in Sections III.C, V, and VI; the paper draws 'almost non-existent' conclusions about cooperative IM from this corpus without a stated systematic search protocol.
  • domain assumption Quantitative statements from cited works, such as the 66% RMSE reduction in [48] and the performance takeaways in Table II, are accurate as reported.
    The paper is a secondary source and does not re-run experiments or verify primary data.
  • standard math Standard mathematical results used in RAIM and Kalman filtering, including least-squares estimation and chi-square test statistics, hold under the stated noise assumptions.
    Section III.A applies textbook GNSS integrity equations; these are uncontroversial background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Role of Integrity Monitoring in Connected and Automated Vehicles: Current State-of-Practice and Future Directions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VD36IYCO

@misc{pith2026250204874,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Role of Integrity Monitoring in Connected and Automated Vehicles: Current State-of-Practice and Future Directions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VD36IYCO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04874}
}
read the original abstract

Positioning integrity refers to the trust in the performance of a navigation system. Accurate and reliable position information is needed to meet the requirements of connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV) applications, particularly in safety-critical scenarios. Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) and its variants have been widely studied for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based vehicle positioning, often fused with kinematic (e.g., Odometry) and perception sensors (e.g., camera). However, integrity monitoring (IM) for cooperative positioning solutions leveraging Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication has received comparatively limited attention. This paper reviews existing research in the field of positioning IM and identifies various research gaps. Particular attention has been placed on identifying research that highlights cooperative IM methods. It also examines key automotive safety standards and public V2X datasets to map current research priorities and uncover critical gaps. Finally, the paper outlines promising future directions, highlighting research topics aimed at advancing and benchmarking positioning integrity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04874 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fundamental operations of vehicle platooning, showcasing research opportunities and challenges in protocol design, trajectory planning, and vehicle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Identified research gaps in Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Stanford-ESA integrity diagram to monitor positioning integrity. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Vehicle’s positioning performance transitioning from nominal operation to misleading information and finally to hazardously misleading information. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic overview of four integrity-monitoring approaches: (a) Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) evaluates pseudorange residuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Timeline of major Cooperative ITS and Connected Vehicle pilot projects in Europe (top row) and the United States (bottom row) from 1999 through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of V2X datasets from object detection & tracking to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    Integrity for Multi-Sensor Cooperative Positioning,

    J. Xiong, J. W. Cheong, Z. Xiong, A. G. Dempster, S. Tian, and R. Wang, “Integrity for Multi-Sensor Cooperative Positioning,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 792–807, 2 2021

    2021

  2. [34]

    A Runtime Integrity Monitoring Framework for Real-Time Relative Positioning Systems Based on GPS and DSRC,

    K. Ansari, Y . Feng, and M. Tang, “A Runtime Integrity Monitoring Framework for Real-Time Relative Positioning Systems Based on GPS and DSRC,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 980–992, 4 2015

    2015

  3. [47]

    A hybrid integrity monitoring method using vehicular wireless communication in difficult environments for GNSS,

    J. Liu, C. Rizos, and B. g. Cai, “A hybrid integrity monitoring method using vehicular wireless communication in difficult environments for GNSS,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 23, p. 100229, 6 2020

    2020

  4. [1]

    Control of connected and automated vehicles: State of the art and future challenges,

    J. Guanetti, Y . Kim, and F. Borrelli, “Control of connected and automated vehicles: State of the art and future challenges,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 45, pp. 18–40, 1 2018

    2018

  5. [2]

    A qualitative analysis of vehicle position- ing requirements for connected vehicle applications,

    N. Williams and M. Barth, “A qualitative analysis of vehicle position- ing requirements for connected vehicle applications,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 225–242, 2021

    2021

  6. [3]

    Survey on Ranging Sensors and Cooperative Techniques for Relative Positioning of Vehicles,

    F. de Ponte M ¨uller, “Survey on Ranging Sensors and Cooperative Techniques for Relative Positioning of Vehicles,” Sensors 2017, Vol. 17, Page 271 , vol. 17, no. 2, p. 271, 1 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/2/ 271/htmhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/2/271

    2017

  7. [4]

    Principles of GNSS Inertial and Multi-Sensor Integrated Navigation Systems - GNSS Technology and Applications,

    P. D. Groves, “Principles of GNSS Inertial and Multi-Sensor Integrated Navigation Systems - GNSS Technology and Applications,” GNSS Technology and Applications Series , p. 522, 2008

    2008

  8. [5]

    Odometer-Aided Ultra-Tight GPS/MIMU Integration for Land Vehicle Navigation in Urban Canyons,

    S. Liu and S. Li, “Odometer-Aided Ultra-Tight GPS/MIMU Integration for Land Vehicle Navigation in Urban Canyons,” 28th Saint Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems, ICINS 2021, 2021

    2021

Show all 129 references
  1. [6]

    Augmen- tation of GNSS by low-cost MEMS IMU, OBD-II, and digital altimeter for improved positioning in urban area,

    J. H. Lim, W. J. Yoo, L. W. Kim, Y . D. Lee, and H. K. Lee, “Augmen- tation of GNSS by low-cost MEMS IMU, OBD-II, and digital altimeter for improved positioning in urban area,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 18, no. 11, 2018

    2018

  2. [7]

    3D LiDAR Aided GNSS NLOS Mitigation in Urban Canyons,

    W. Wen and L.-t. Hsu, “3D LiDAR Aided GNSS NLOS Mitigation in Urban Canyons,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1–13, 2022

    2022

  3. [8]

    Integrity Monitoring of GNSS/INS Based Positioning Systems for Autonomous Vehicles: State-of-the-Art and Open Challenges,

    H. Jing, Y . Gao, S. Shahbeigi, and M. Dianati, “Integrity Monitoring of GNSS/INS Based Positioning Systems for Autonomous Vehicles: State-of-the-Art and Open Challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Intelli- gent Transportation Systems, 2022. 17

    2022

  4. [9]

    GNSS Integrity and Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM),

    S. Pullen and M. Joerger, “GNSS Integrity and Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM),” Position, Navigation, and Timing Tech- nologies in the 21st Century , pp. 591–617, 12 2020

    2020

  5. [10]

    A review of system integration and current integrity monitoring methods for positioning in intelligent transport systems,

    T. Hassan, A. El-Mowafy, and K. Wang, “A review of system integration and current integrity monitoring methods for positioning in intelligent transport systems,” IET Intelligent Transport Systems , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–60, 1 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //onlinelibrary....

    2021 doi

  6. [11]

    Analysis and improvement of car-following stability for connected automated vehicles with multiple information uncertainties,

    S. Li, B. Zhou, and M. Xu, “Analysis and improvement of car-following stability for connected automated vehicles with multiple information uncertainties,” Applied Mathematical Modelling , vol. 123, pp. 790– 809, 11 2023

    2023

  7. [12]

    Distributed Model Predictive Control for Vehicle Platoon With Mixed Disturbances and Model Uncertainties,

    X. Hu, L. Xie, L. Xie, S. Lu, W. Xu, and H. Su, “Distributed Model Predictive Control for Vehicle Platoon With Mixed Disturbances and Model Uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 17 354–17 365, 10 2022

    2022

  8. [13]

    Position Uncertainty-Tolerant Cooperative Merging Application for Mixed Multilane Traffic,

    N. Williams, G. Wu, and M. Barth, “Position Uncertainty-Tolerant Cooperative Merging Application for Mixed Multilane Traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 143–153, 3 2022

    2022

  9. [14]

    A Review of Connected and Automated Vehicle Platoon Merging and Splitting Operations,

    Q. Li, Z. Chen, and X. Li, “A Review of Connected and Automated Vehicle Platoon Merging and Splitting Operations,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 22 790– 22 806, 12 2022

    2022

  10. [15]

    Platoon Control of Connected Multi-Vehicle Systems under V2X Communications: Design and Ex- periments,

    Y . Li, W. Chen, S. Peeta, and Y . Wang, “Platoon Control of Connected Multi-Vehicle Systems under V2X Communications: Design and Ex- periments,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1891–1902, 5 2020

    1902

  11. [16]

    Modeling and Optimization of Connected and Automated Vehicle Platooning Cooperative Control with Measurement Errors,

    W. Luo, X. Li, J. Hu, and W. Hu, “Modeling and Optimization of Connected and Automated Vehicle Platooning Cooperative Control with Measurement Errors,” Sensors 2023, Vol. 23, Page 9006 , vol. 23, no. 21, p. 9006, 11 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/...

    2023

  12. [17]

    Uncertainty, Efficiency, and Stability of Mixed Traffic Flow: Stochastic Model-Based Analyses,

    L. Lu, F. Zheng, and X. Liu, “Uncertainty, Efficiency, and Stability of Mixed Traffic Flow: Stochastic Model-Based Analyses,” Transportation Research Record , 1 2024. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03611981231215338

    2024 doi

  13. [18]

    Impact of Positioning Uncertainty on Autonomous Intersection Management System,

    S. Chamideh, W. T ¨arneberg, and M. Kihl, “Impact of Positioning Uncertainty on Autonomous Intersection Management System,” in 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) . IEEE, 9 2023, pp. 1912–1919. [Online]. Available: https://ieeex...

    2023

  14. [19]

    Autonomous Intersection Crossing With Vehicle Location Uncertainty,

    C. Vitale, P. Kolios, and G. Ellinas, “Autonomous Intersection Crossing With Vehicle Location Uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 17 546–17 561, 10 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9721150/

    2022

  15. [20]

    Optimizing vehicle re-ordering events in coordinated autonomous intersection crossings under cavs’ location uncertainty,

    C. Vitale, P. Kolios, and G.Ellinas, “Optimizing vehicle re-ordering events in coordinated autonomous intersection crossings under cavs’ location uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 3473–3488, 2023

    2023

  16. [21]

    Safe Intersection Management With Coop- erative Perception for Mixed Traffic of Human-Driven and Autonomous Vehicles,

    S. Aoki and R. Rajkumar, “Safe Intersection Management With Coop- erative Perception for Mixed Traffic of Human-Driven and Autonomous Vehicles,”IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 3, pp. 251– 265, 2022

    2022

  17. [22]

    A new imu-aided multiple gnss fault detection and exclusion algorithm for integrated navigation in urban environments,

    R. Sun, J. Wang, Q. Cheng, Y . Mao, and W. Y . Ochieng, “A new imu-aided multiple gnss fault detection and exclusion algorithm for integrated navigation in urban environments,” GPS Solut., vol. 25, no. 4, oct 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10291-021-01181-4

    2021 doi

  18. [23]

    Navigation system integrity monitoring using redundant measurements,

    M. A. STURZA, “Navigation system integrity monitoring using redundant measurements,” NAVIGATION, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 483–501,

  19. [24]

    An Integrity Assessment Framework for Multi-modal Vehicle Localization,

    A. Balakrishnan, S. A. Rodriguez F., and R. Reynaud, “An Integrity Assessment Framework for Multi-modal Vehicle Localization,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) . IEEE, 10 2019, pp. 2976–2983. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore. ieee.org/do...

    2019

  20. [25]

    Context-aware gps integrity monitoring for intelligent transport systems,

    T. Binjammaz, A. H. Al-Bayatti, and A. Al-Hargan, “Context-aware gps integrity monitoring for intelligent transport systems,” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. co...

    2016

  21. [26]

    Sensor-Based Prognostic Health Management of Advanced Driver Assistance System for Autonomous Vehicles: A Recent Survey,

    I. Raouf, A. Khan, S. Khalid, M. Sohail, M. M. Azad, and H. S. Kim, “Sensor-Based Prognostic Health Management of Advanced Driver Assistance System for Autonomous Vehicles: A Recent Survey,” Mathematics 2022, Vol. 10, Page 3233 , vol. 10, no. 18, p. 3233, 9 2022. [Online]. Ava...

    2022

  22. [27]

    Systematic literature review: Anomaly detection in connected and autonomous vehicles,

    J. R. V . Solaas, E. Mariconti, and N. Tuptuk, “Systematic literature review: Anomaly detection in connected and autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , pp. 1–16, 2024

    2024

  23. [28]

    Recent Advances in Sensor Integrity Monitoring Methods - A Review,

    F. A. Costa De Oliveira, F. S. Torres, and A. Garcia-Ortiz, “Recent Advances in Sensor Integrity Monitoring Methods - A Review,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 10 256–10 279, 6 2022

    2022

  24. [29]

    Integrity for autonomous driving: A survey,

    M. Worner, F. Schuster, F. Dolitzscher, C. G. Keller, M. Haueis, and K. Dietmayer, “Integrity for autonomous driving: A survey,” Proceed- ings of the IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, PLANS 2016, pp. 666–671, 5 2016

    2016

  25. [30]

    The stanford - ESA integrity diagram: A new tool for the user domain SBAS integrity assessment,

    M. Tossaint, J. Samson, F. Toran, J. Ventura-Traveset, M. Hernandez- Pajares, J. M. Juan, J. Sanz, and P. Ramos-Bosch, “The stanford - ESA integrity diagram: A new tool for the user domain SBAS integrity assessment,” Navigation, Journal of the Institute of Navigation, vol. 54,...

    2007

  26. [31]

    GNSS Position Integrity in Urban Environments: A Review of Literature,

    N. Zhu, J. Marais, D. Betaille, and M. Berbineau, “GNSS Position Integrity in Urban Environments: A Review of Literature,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2762–2778, 9 2018

    2018

  27. [32]

    A review of the evolution of the integrity methods applied in gnss,

    P. Zabalegui, G. De Miguel, A. P ´erez, J. Mendizabal, J. Goya, and I. Adin, “A review of the evolution of the integrity methods applied in gnss,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 45 813–45 824, 2020

    2020

  28. [33]

    Comparison and evaluation of integrity algorithms for vehicle dynamic state estimation in different scenarios for an application in automated driving,

    G. Gottschalg and S. Leinen, “Comparison and evaluation of integrity algorithms for vehicle dynamic state estimation in different scenarios for an application in automated driving,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2021

    2021

  29. [35]

    Integrity of Visual Nav- igation—Developments, Challenges, and Prospects,

    C. Zhu, M. Meurer, and C. G ¨unther, “Integrity of Visual Nav- igation—Developments, Challenges, and Prospects,” NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation , vol. 69, no. 2, p. 69, 6 2022. [Online]. Available: https://navi.ion.org/content/69/2/navi.518https: //navi.ion...

    2022

  30. [36]

    Integrity Monitoring of Multimodal Perception System for Vehicle Localization,

    A. Balakrishnan, S. R. Florez, and R. Reynaud, “Integrity Monitoring of Multimodal Perception System for Vehicle Localization,” Sensors 2020, Vol. 20, Page 4654 , vol. 20, no. 16, p. 4654, 8

    2020

  31. [37]

    Set-Theoretic Approaches in Analysis, Estimation and Control of Nonlinear Systems,

    B. Chachuat, B. Houska, R. Paulen, N. Peri ´c, J. Rajyaguru, and M. E. Villanueva, “Set-Theoretic Approaches in Analysis, Estimation and Control of Nonlinear Systems,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 981–995, 1 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc...

    2015

  32. [38]

    Advances in Deterministic Approaches for Bounding Uncertainty and Integrity Monitoring of Autonomous Navigation,

    J. Su and S. Sch ¨on, “Advances in Deterministic Approaches for Bounding Uncertainty and Integrity Monitoring of Autonomous Navigation,” 35th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GNSS+ 2022 , vol. 2, pp. 1442–1454, 2022....

    2022

  33. [39]

    A Comprehensive Survey on the Integrity of Localization Systems,

    E. Maharmeh, Z. Alsayed, and F. Nashashibi, “A Comprehensive Survey on the Integrity of Localization Systems,” Sensors 2025, Vol. 25, Page 358 , vol. 25, no. 2, p. 358, 1

    2025

  34. [40]

    Integrity concept for sensor fusion algorithms used in a prototype vehicle for automated driving,

    G. Gottschalg, M. Becker, and S. Leinen, “Integrity concept for sensor fusion algorithms used in a prototype vehicle for automated driving,” 2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020 , 11 2020

    2020

  35. [41]

    Integrity monitoring of vision-based automotive lane detection methods,

    C. Mario and J. H. Rife, “Integrity monitoring of vision-based automotive lane detection methods,” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:113952716

    2010

  36. [42]

    High integrity localization with multi-lane camera measurements,

    J. Al Hage, P. Xu, and P. Bonnifait, “High integrity localization with multi-lane camera measurements,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Sympo- sium, Proceedings, vol. 2019-June, pp. 1232–1238, 6 2019

    2019

  37. [43]

    Using sky-pointing fish-eye camera and LiDAR to aid GNSS single-point positioning in urban canyons,

    X. Bai, W. Wen, and L. T. Hsu, “Using sky-pointing fish-eye camera and LiDAR to aid GNSS single-point positioning in urban canyons,” pp. 908–914, 2020

    2020

  38. [44]

    Conservative Uncertainty Estimation in Map- Based Vision-Aided Navigation,

    Z. Zhu and C. Taylor, “Conservative Uncertainty Estimation in Map- Based Vision-Aided Navigation,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 941–949, 4 2017

    2017

  39. [45]

    Cooperative vision for swarm navigation,

    C. Zhu, “Cooperative vision for swarm navigation,” Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universit ¨at M ¨unchen, 2019. [Online]. Available: https: //elib.dlr.de/133488/ 18

    2019

  40. [46]

    Cooperative position prediction: Beyond vehicle-to-vehicle relative positioning,

    K. Ansari, “Cooperative position prediction: Beyond vehicle-to-vehicle relative positioning,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1121–1130, 3 2020

    2020

  41. [48]

    Autonomous Integrity Monitoring for Vehicular Navigation With Cellular Signals of Opportunity and an IMU,

    M. Maaref and Z. M. Kassas, “Autonomous Integrity Monitoring for Vehicular Navigation With Cellular Signals of Opportunity and an IMU,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5586–5601, 6 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Integrity and Collaboration in Dynamic Sensor Networks,

    S. Sch ¨on, C. Brenner, H. Alkhatib, M. Coenen, H. Dbouk, N. Garcia- Fernandez, C. Fischer, C. Heipke, K. Lohmann, I. Neumann, U. Nguyen, J. A. Paffenholz, T. Peters, F. Rottensteiner, J. Schachtschneider, M. Sester, L. Sun, S. V ogel, R. V oges, and B. Wagner, “Integrity and ...

    2018

  43. [51]

    Vehicle positioning for C-ITS in Australia (background document),

    D. Green, J. Gaffney, P. Bennett, Y . Feng, M. Higgins, and J. Millner, “Vehicle positioning for C-ITS in Australia (background document),” pp. 1–79, 4 2013. [Online]. Available: https://austroads. com.au/publications/connected-and-automated-vehicles/ap-r431-13

    2013

  44. [52]

    Cyber Mobility Mirror: A Deep Learning-based Real-World Object Perception Platform Using Roadside LiDAR,

    Z. Bai, S. Member, S. P. Nayak, X. Zhao, G. Wu, S. Member, M. J. Barth, X. Qi, Y . Liu, E. Akin Sisbot, and K. Oguchi, “Cyber Mobility Mirror: A Deep Learning-based Real-World Object Perception Platform Using Roadside LiDAR,” SSRN Electronic Journal , 2 2022. [Online]. Availab...

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Evaluation of Infrastructure-Assisted Cooperative Tracking of Vehi- cles Using Various Motion Models,

    S. P. Nayak, G. Wu, M. Barth, Y . Liu, E. A. Sisbot, and K. Oguchi, “Evaluation of Infrastructure-Assisted Cooperative Tracking of Vehi- cles Using Various Motion Models,”2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, PLANS 2023 , pp. 243–253, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Infrastructure-Assisted Cooperative State Estimation of Ego-Vehicle via Augmentation of Asynchronous Kinematic Measurements,

    S. Nayak, G. Wu, M. Barth, Y . Liu, E. A. Sisbot, and K. Oguchi, “Infrastructure-Assisted Cooperative State Estimation of Ego-Vehicle via Augmentation of Asynchronous Kinematic Measurements,” in Proceedings of the International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation,...

    2024

  47. [55]

    Collaboration-enhanced receiver integrity monitoring (cerim),

    J. H. Rife, “Collaboration-enhanced receiver integrity monitoring (cerim),” 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) , pp. 13–18, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7488196

    2011

  48. [56]

    Determination of Required Positioning Integrity Parameters for Design of Vehicle Safety Applications,

    Y . Feng, C. Wang, and C. Karl, “Determination of Required Positioning Integrity Parameters for Design of Vehicle Safety Applications,” pp. 129–141, 2 2018. [Online]. Available: http: //www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?jp=p&articleID=15556

    2018

  49. [57]

    On the Validation of Multi-sensor High Integrity Positioning solutions for the Connected Car: The P-CAR Infrastructure,

    F. Valentini, E. Cinque, V . Sulli, F. Rispoli, M. Pratesi, F. Santucci, and A. Neri, “On the Validation of Multi-sensor High Integrity Positioning solutions for the Connected Car: The P-CAR Infrastructure,” in Proceedings of the International Technical Meeting of The Institut...

    2022

  50. [58]

    Application of Functional Safety in Autonomous Vehicles Using ISO 26262 Standard: A Survey,

    M. A. Gosavi, B. B. Rhoades, and J. M. Conrad, “Application of Functional Safety in Autonomous Vehicles Using ISO 26262 Standard: A Survey,” Conference Proceedings - IEEE SOUTHEASTCON , vol. 2018-April, 10 2018

    2018

  51. [59]

    Safety in Use and Automated Driving in Consideration of the New ISO 21448,

    M. G ¨otze, M. Witt, N. Willer, and F. Raisch, “Safety in Use and Automated Driving in Consideration of the New ISO 21448,” ATZ worldwide 2023 125:4 , vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 38–43, 3

    2023

  52. [60]

    GNSS Functional Safety for the Autonomous Vehicle,

    F. Pisoni, G. Avellone, D. D. Grazia, A. Silverio, J. Durand, J. Garcia, E. D. Tijero, and E. Falletti, “GNSS Functional Safety for the Autonomous Vehicle,”Proceedings of the 32nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GNS...

    2019

  53. [61]

    Demonstration of a Functionally Safe GNSS/INS Positioning Software Library for Autonomous Land Vehicles,

    E. Infante, R. Gaum, and L. Norman, “Demonstration of a Functionally Safe GNSS/INS Positioning Software Library for Autonomous Land Vehicles,” pp. 295–315, 9 2024. [Online]. Available: http://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?jp=p&articleID=19742

    2024

  54. [62]

    Safety Integrity Levels for Artificial Intelligence,

    S. Diemert, L. Millet, J. Groves, and J. Joyce, “Safety Integrity Levels for Artificial Intelligence,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , vol. 14182 LNCS, pp. 397–409,

  55. [63]

    Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Safety Standards for Machine Learning-based Road Vehicle Functions,

    S. Burton, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Safety Standards for Machine Learning-based Road Vehicle Functions,” SAE Research Report EPR2024017 , 8 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sae. org/content/epr2024017

    2024

  56. [64]

    Validation Challenges of Safety of the Intended Functionalities (SOTIF) Risks/Hazards,

    S. Krishnan, P. K. Venkatesh, S. Krishnan, and P. K. Venkatesh, “Validation Challenges of Safety of the Intended Functionalities (SOTIF) Risks/Hazards,” SAE Technical Papers , 10 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-28-0005

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    Safety of the Intended Functionality Validation for Automated Driving Systems by Using Perception Performance Insufficiencies Injection,

    V . J. E. Jim ´enez, G. Macher, D. Watzenig, and E. Brenner, “Safety of the Intended Functionality Validation for Automated Driving Systems by Using Perception Performance Insufficiencies Injection,” Vehicles 2024, Vol. 6, Pages 1164-1184 , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1164–1184, 7

    2024

  58. [66]

    A Safety Analysis and Verification Framework for Autonomous Vehicles Based on the Identification of Triggering Events,

    A. Huang, X. Xing, T. Zhou, and J. Chen, “A Safety Analysis and Verification Framework for Autonomous Vehicles Based on the Identification of Triggering Events,” in SAE Technical Papers , no. 2021. SAE International, 1 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.4271/2021-01-5010

    2021 doi

  59. [67]

    Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/ 978-3-031-40953-0 34

    [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/ 978-3-031-40953-0 34

  60. [68]

    Design of Sensor Data Processing Software for the ISO 23150 Standard: Application to Autonomous Vehicle Software,

    J. Y . Han, J. H. Park, H. J. Kim, and S. Lee, “Design of Sensor Data Processing Software for the ISO 23150 Standard: Application to Autonomous Vehicle Software,” Electronics 2023, Vol. 12, Page 4505 , vol. 12, no. 21, p. 4505, 11 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.co...

    2023

  61. [69]

    ISO 16505:2019 - Road vehicles — Ergonomic and performance aspects of Camera Monitor Systems — Requirements and test procedures

    “ISO 16505:2019 - Road vehicles — Ergonomic and performance aspects of Camera Monitor Systems — Requirements and test procedures.” [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/72000. html

    2019

  62. [70]

    Complying with ISO 26262 and ISO/SAE 21434: A Safety and Security Co-Analysis Method for Intelligent Connected Vehicle,

    Y . Li, W. Liu, Q. Liu, X. Zheng, K. Sun, and C. Huang, “Complying with ISO 26262 and ISO/SAE 21434: A Safety and Security Co-Analysis Method for Intelligent Connected Vehicle,” Sensors 2024, Vol. 24, Page 1848 , vol. 24, no. 6, p. 1848, 3 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ww...

    2024

  63. [71]

    Review on V2X, I2X, and P2X Communications and Their Applications: A Comprehensive Analysis over Time,

    J. M. L. Dom ´ınguez and T. J. Mateo Sanguino, “Review on V2X, I2X, and P2X Communications and Their Applications: A Comprehensive Analysis over Time,” Sensors 2019, Vol. 19, Page 2756 , vol. 19, no. 12, p. 2756, 6 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/1...

    2019

  64. [72]

    C-ITS: Three observations on LTE-V2X and ETSI-ITS G5,

    A. Turley, K. Moerman, A. Filippi, and V . Martinez, “C-ITS: Three observations on LTE-V2X and ETSI-ITS G5,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:54546491

    2018

  65. [73]

    Automotive Regulatory Guide – 2023 - ACEA - European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association

    “Automotive Regulatory Guide – 2023 - ACEA - European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association.” [Online]. Available: https: //www.acea.auto/publication/automotive-regulatory-guide-2023/

    2023

  66. [74]

    DRIVE C2X Deliverable D11.6 Version 1.0 2 (Final Report),

    M. Schulze, T. M ¨akinen, T. Kessel, S. Metzner, and H. Stoyanov, “DRIVE C2X Deliverable D11.6 Version 1.0 2 (Final Report),” Eu- ropean Union’s Seventh Framework Programme, Tech. Rep., 2014

    2014

  67. [75]

    Car2x-From Research to Product De- velopment: How Automotive OEMs and Suppliers are Successfully Completing Production Car2x Projects,

    H.-W. Schaal and T. L ¨offler, “Car2x-From Research to Product De- velopment: How Automotive OEMs and Suppliers are Successfully Completing Production Car2x Projects,” VECTOR, Tech. Rep., 2012

    2012

  68. [76]

    SCOOP Project : connected road and vehicle

    “SCOOP Project : connected road and vehicle.” [Online]. Available: https://www.scoop.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/en/

  69. [77]

    NordicWay 3 Final report: Evaluation Report,

    S. Innamaa, “NordicWay 3 Final report: Evaluation Report,” VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Tech. Rep., 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nordicway.net/

    2024

  70. [78]

    V2N2X Communications: Architecture, Solution Blueprint, and Use Case Examples

    “V2N2X Communications: Architecture, Solution Blueprint, and Use Case Examples.” [Online]. Available: https://5gaa.org/content/uploads/

  71. [79]

    Performance comparison between LTE-V2X and ITS-G5 under realistic urban scenarios,

    M. Karoui, A. Freitas, and G. Chalhoub, “Performance comparison between LTE-V2X and ITS-G5 under realistic urban scenarios,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 2020-May, 5 2020

    2020

  72. [80]

    CONCORDA approach: Connected Corridor for Driving Automation

    E. Catana, “CONCORDA approach: Connected Corridor for Driving Automation.” Hamburg, Germany: 27th ITS World Congress, 2021, pp. 11–15. [Online]. Available: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/359258448 CONCORDA approach Connected Corridor for Driving Automation Proceedin...

    2021

  73. [81]

    Modelling the C-ITS architectures: C-MobILE case study,

    R. Ferrandez, Y . Dajsuren, P. Karkhanis, M. F ¨unfrocken, and M. Pil- lado, “Modelling the C-ITS architectures: C-MobILE case study,” in 25th ITS World Congress 2018 , Copenhagen, Denmark, 11 2018

    2018

  74. [82]

    5GMOBIX D2.2: 5G architecture and technologies for CCAM specifications,

    K. Trichias, “5GMOBIX D2.2: 5G architecture and technologies for CCAM specifications,” Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.5g-mobix.com/assets/files/5G-MOBIX-D2. 2-5G-architecture-and-technologies-for-CCAM-specifications-V1.0. pdf

    2019

  75. [83]

    5G Architecture for Cross-border Mobility Services: The 5G-Routes Project Approach,

    J. Rodriguez, G. Gomez, J. Baranda, A. Lindenbergs, and M. Manni, “5G Architecture for Cross-border Mobility Services: The 5G-Routes Project Approach,” in 15th ITS European Congress , Lisbon, Portugal, 5 2023, pp. 22–24

    2023

  76. [84]

    EN 302 637-2 - V1.3.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehic- ular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Part 2: Specification of Cooperative Awareness Basic Service,

    “EN 302 637-2 - V1.3.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehic- ular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Part 2: Specification of Cooperative Awareness Basic Service,” Tech. Rep., 2014

    2014

  77. [85]

    Documents: C-Roads

    “Documents: C-Roads.” [Online]. Available: https://www.c-roads.eu/ platform/documents.html

  78. [86]

    EN 302 665 - V1.1.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Communications Architecture,

    “EN 302 665 - V1.1.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Communications Architecture,” Tech. Rep., 2010. [Online]. Available: http://portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI support.asp

    2010

  79. [87]

    Rep., 2017

    “EN 302 571 - V2.1.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Radiocommunications equipment operating in the 5 855 MHz to 5 925 MHz frequency band; Harmonised Standard covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of Directive 2014/53/EU,” Tech. Rep., 2017. [Online]. Availa...

    2014

  80. [88]

    Rep., 2011

    “TR 102 863 - V1.1.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Local Dynamic Map (LDM); Rationale for and guidance on standardization,” Tech. Rep., 2011

    2011

  81. [89]

    Traffic optimization for signalized corridors (tosco) phase 2 project,

    R. Goudy, R. K. Deering, V . V . Kumar, S. Hussain, T. Yumak, N. Probert, D. Tian, K. Balke, D. Florence, Y . Fan, N. Bruettner, K. Sommerwerk, D. Bondarenko, C. A. M. Partners, and V . to Infrastructure (V2I) Consortium, “Traffic optimization for signalized corridors (tosco) ...

    2022

  82. [90]

    Safety Pilot Model Deployment: Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Future Connected Vehicle Activities,

    K. Gay and V . Kniss, “Safety Pilot Model Deployment: Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Future Connected Vehicle Activities,” Tech. Rep., 9 2015. [Online]. Available: https://rosap.ntl. bts.gov/view/dot/4361

    2015

  83. [91]

    Rep., 2019

    “EN 302 637-3 - V1.3.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehic- ular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Part 3: Specifications of Decentralized Environmental Notification Basic Service,” Tech. Rep., 2019

    2019

  84. [92]

    Data Infrastructure for Connected Vehicle Applications,

    X. Wang, S. Shen, D. Bezzina, J. R. Sayer, H. X. Liu, and Y . Feng, “Data Infrastructure for Connected Vehicle Applications,” Transporta- tion Research Record, vol. 2674, no. 5, pp. 85–96, 5 2020

    2020

  85. [93]

    USDOT ITS Research - Connected Vehicle Pilot Deployment Program

    “USDOT ITS Research - Connected Vehicle Pilot Deployment Program.” [Online]. Available: https://www.its.dot.gov/pilots/overview. htm

  86. [94]

    Honda Global — SAFE SW ARM

    “Honda Global — SAFE SW ARM.” [Online]. Available: https: //global.honda/en/innovation/CES/2020/safe swarm.html

    2020

  87. [95]

    ITS America National V2X Deployment Plan: An Infrastructure & Automaker Collaboration,

    ITS America, “ITS America National V2X Deployment Plan: An Infrastructure & Automaker Collaboration,” Connected Vehicles, ITS America, Tech. Rep., 4 2023. [Online]. Available: https://itsa.org/ advocacy-material/its-america-national-v2x-deployment-plan/

    2023

  88. [96]

    Saving Lives with Connectivity: A Plan to Accelerate V2X Deployment Non-Binding Contents,

    US-DOT ITS Joint Program Office, “Saving Lives with Connectivity: A Plan to Accelerate V2X Deployment Non-Binding Contents,” Tech. Rep., 8 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.its.dot.gov/research areas/emerging tech/pdf/Accelerate V2X Deployment final.pdf

    2024

  89. [97]

    Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) For Partially Automated Truck Platooning,

    S. E. Shladover, L. Yang, H. Ramezani, J. Spring, C. Nowakowski, D. Nelson, D. Thompson, A. Kailas, and B. McAuliffe, “Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) For Partially Automated Truck Platooning,” Tech. Rep., 2018. [Online]. Available: https://rosap.ntl. bts.gov/view/dot/43776

    2018

  90. [98]

    [Online]

    V2X Vehicular Applications Technical Committee, Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) Performance Requirements for V2V Safety Awareness , oct 2018. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.4271/J2945/2 201810

    2018 doi

  91. [99]

    [Online]

    Infrastructure Applications Technical Committee, Road Safety Applications, may 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 4271/J2945/4 202305

    2023

  92. [100]

    [Online]

    V2X Core Technical Committee, High-Precision Positioning for V2X Systems, aug 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J2945/ 7 202308

    2023 doi

  93. [101]

    [Online]

    V2X Vehicular Applications Technical Committee, Vulnerable Road User Safety Message Minimum Performance Requirements , mar 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J2945/9 201703

    2017 doi

  94. [102]

    [Online]

    On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles , apr 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J3016 202104

    2021 doi

  95. [103]

    [Online]

    V2X Core Technical Committee, On-Board System Requirements for V2V Safety Communications , apr 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J2945/1 202004

    2020 doi

  96. [104]

    FHW A Cooperative Automation Research: CARMA Proof of-Concept TSMO Use Case Testing: CARMA Cooperative Perception Low-Level Concept of Operations — FHW A,

    Y . Lou, D. Hale, M. McConnel, A. Ghiasi, M. Jannat, and S. Racha, “FHW A Cooperative Automation Research: CARMA Proof of-Concept TSMO Use Case Testing: CARMA Cooperative Perception Low-Level Concept of Operations — FHW A,” 11 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2194...

    2022 doi

  97. [105]

    OpenCDA: An Open Cooperative Driving Automation Framework Integrated with Co- Simulation,

    R. Xu, Y . Guo, X. Han, X. Xia, H. Xiang, and J. Ma, “OpenCDA: An Open Cooperative Driving Automation Framework Integrated with Co- Simulation,” IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, vol. 2021-September, pp. 1155–1162, 9 2021

    2021

  98. [106]

    Towards Interactive and Learnable Cooperative Driving Automation: a Large Language Model-Driven Decision-Making Framework,

    S. Fang, J. Liu, M. Ding, Y . Cui, C. Lv, S. Member, P. Hang, and J. Sun, “Towards Interactive and Learnable Cooperative Driving Automation: a Large Language Model-Driven Decision-Making Framework,” 9

  99. [107]

    [Online]

    V2X Vehicular Applications Technical Committee, Application Protocol and Requirements for Maneuver Sharing and Coordinating Service, mar 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J3186 202303

    2023 doi

  100. [108]

    [Online]

    Advanced Applications Technical Committee, V2X Sensor-Sharing for Cooperative and Automated Driving , aug 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J3224 202208

    2022 doi

  101. [109]

    [Online]

    Cooperative Driving Automation(CDA) Committee, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Cooperative Driving Automation for On-Road Motor Vehicles , jul 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.4271/J3216 202107

    2021 doi

  102. [110]

    [Online]

    Cooperative Driving Automation(CDA) committee, Cooperative Driving Automation (CDA) Feature - Infrastructure-Based Prescriptive Cooperative Merge , mar 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J3256 202403

    2024 doi

  103. [111]

    [Online]

    Cooperative Driving Automation(CDA) Committee, Cooperative Driving Automation (CDA) Feature: Perception Status Sharing for Occluded Pedestrian Collision Avoidance , aug 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J3251 202308

    2023 doi

  104. [112]

    A Survey on Autonomous Driving Datasets: Statistics, Annotation Quality, and a Future Outlook,

    M. Liu, E. Yurtsever, J. Fossaert, X. Zhou, W. Zimmer, Y . Cui, B. L. Zagar, and A. C. Knoll, “A Survey on Autonomous Driving Datasets: Statistics, Annotation Quality, and a Future Outlook,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12812v2

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12812v2

  106. [114]

    V2V4Real: A Real-world Large-scale Dataset for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Perception,

    R. Xu, X. Xia, J. Li, H. Li, S. Zhang, Z. Tu, Z. Meng, H. Xiang, X. Dong, R. Song, H. Yu, B. Zhou, and J. Ma, “V2V4Real: A Real-world Large-scale Dataset for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Perception,” Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and ...

    2023 arXiv

  107. [115]

    DAIR-V2X: A Large-Scale Dataset for Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Object Detection,

    H. Yu, Y . Luo, M. Shu, Y . Huo, Z. Yang, Y . Shi, Z. Guo, H. Li, X. Hu, J. Yuan, and Z. Nie, “DAIR-V2X: A Large-Scale Dataset for Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Object Detection,” Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn...

    2022 arXiv

  108. [116]

    [Online]

    Cooperative Driving Automation(CDA) Committee, Cooperative Infrastructure CDA Feature: Cooperative Permissive Left Turn Across Opposing Traffic with Infrastructure Guidance , jun 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/J3282 202406

    2024 doi

  109. [117]

    V2X-Real: a Largs-Scale Dataset for Vehicle-to-Everything Cooperative Perception,

    H. Xiang, Z. Zheng, X. Xia, R. Xu, L. Gao, Z. Zhou, X. Han, X. Ji, M. Li, Z. Meng, L. Jin, M. Lei, Z. Ma, Z. He, H. Ma, Y . Yuan, Y . Zhao, and J. Ma, “V2X-Real: a Largs-Scale Dataset for Vehicle-to-Everything Cooperative Perception,” 3 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv...

    2024 arXiv

  110. [118]

    V2X-Seq: A Large-Scale Sequential Dataset for Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 20 Perception and Forecasting,

    H. Yu, W. Yang, H. Ruan, Z. Yang, Y . Tang, X. Gao, X. Hao, Y . Shi, Y . Pan, N. Sun, J. Song, J. Yuan, P. Luo, and Z. Nie, “V2X-Seq: A Large-Scale Sequential Dataset for Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 20 Perception and Forecasting,” pp. 5486–5495, 5 2023. [Online]. Availa...

    2023 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Berlin V2X: A Machine Learning Dataset from Multiple Vehicles and Radio Access Technologies,

    R. Hernang ´omez, P. Geuer, A. Palaios, D. Sch ¨aufele, C. Watermann, K. Taleb-Bouhemadi, M. Parvini, A. Krause, S. Partani, C. Vielhaus, M. Kasparick, D. F. K ¨ulzer, F. Burmeister, F. H. P. Fitzek, H. D. Schotten, G. Fettweis, and S. Sta ´nczak, “Berlin V2X: A Machine Learni...

    2023

  112. [120]

    V2X- Sim: Multi-Agent Collaborative Perception Dataset and Benchmark for Autonomous Driving,

    Y . Li, D. Ma, Z. An, Z. Wang, Y . Zhong, S. Chen, and C. Feng, “V2X- Sim: Multi-Agent Collaborative Perception Dataset and Benchmark for Autonomous Driving,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 10 914–10 921, 10 2022

    2022

  113. [121]

    V2AIX: A Multi-Modal Real-World Dataset of ETSI ITS V2X Messages in Public Road Traffic,

    G. Kueppers, J.-P. Busch, L. Reiher, and L. Eckstein, “V2AIX: A Multi-Modal Real-World Dataset of ETSI ITS V2X Messages in Public Road Traffic,” 3 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2403.10221v2

    2024 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Tihan-v2x: A comprehensive dataset for dynamic c-v2x communication within the indian context,

    A. Sahu, P. Pydimarri, P. Rajalakshmi, S. V . Srikanth, and M. Prasad, “Tihan-v2x: A comprehensive dataset for dynamic c-v2x communication within the indian context,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/f2kd-9g03 Saswat Priyadarshi Nayak received the B. Tech...

    2024 doi

  115. [123]

    TUMTraf V2X Cooperative Perception Dataset,

    W. Zimmer, G. A. Wardana, S. Sritharan, X. Zhou, R. Song, and A. C. Knoll, “TUMTraf V2X Cooperative Perception Dataset,” 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 22 668–22 677, 6 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/docu...

    2024

  116. [127]

    H-V2X: A Large Scale Highway Dataset for BEV Perception,

    C. Liu, M. Zhu, and C. Ma, “H-V2X: A Large Scale Highway Dataset for BEV Perception,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) . Springer, Cham, 2025, vol. 15059 LNCS, pp. 139–157. [...

    2025

  117. [1988]

    Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10

    [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/j.2161-4296.1988.tb00975.x

    1988

  118. [2020]

    Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/16/ 4654/htmhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/16/4654

    [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/16/ 4654/htmhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/16/4654

  119. [2023]

    Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s38311-022-1456-9

    [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s38311-022-1456-9

  120. [2024]

    Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8921/6/3/55/ htmhttps://www.mdpi.com/2624-8921/6/3/55

    [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8921/6/3/55/ htmhttps://www.mdpi.com/2624-8921/6/3/55

  121. [2025]

    Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/2/ 358/htmhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/2/358

    [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/2/ 358/htmhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/2/358

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.