Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Neurophysiological correlates to the human brain complexity through $q$-statistical analysis of electroencephalogram

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the q parameter of q-statistics, fitted to EEG event-interval distributions, is a valid first-approach measure of human neural complexity, supported by higher q for pooled channels, declining q with age, and q's…

desk verdict Useful exploratory extension of the authors' own q-EEG method, but the q–spectrum correlations are not yet separated from the threshold-crossing event-definition confound, so the complexity claim outruns the controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06057 v1 pith:YKQCLMDX submitted 2025-02-09 q-bio.NC cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.med-ph

Dimitri Marques Abramov , Daniel de Freitas Quintanilha , Henrique Santos Lima , Roozemeria Pereira Costa , Carla Kamil-Leite , Vladimir V. Lazarev , Constantino Tsallis This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NCcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.med-ph
keywords q-statisticsneuralcomplexityelectroencephalogramevent-intervaldistributionthetabandbetaagingfunctionalstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the index $q$ of $q$-statistics—a generalization of Boltzmann–Gibbs statistical mechanics in which $q$ measures the non-additivity of entropy—can serve as a first-pass measure of human neural complexity when fitted to EEG event-interval distributions. The authors fitted $q$ to ongoing EEG from 70 adults across seven functional states, both at 20 individual scalp channels and for all channels pooled into one distribution. They found that pooled-channel $q$ is higher than the average of single-channel $q$, that $q$ declines with age, and that $q$ correlates positively with theta-band power and negatively with beta1-band power. The authors interpret this pattern as evidence that $q$ captures system-level, non-local complexity of brain activity rather than a property of any single site, and they propose $q$-statistics as a viable way to describe human neural complexity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the parameter $q$ of the $q$-exponential distribution used by $q$-statistics, fitted to the empirical distribution of time intervals between EEG events. An event is defined as the signal amplitude crossing down through a threshold of $-1.0$ standard deviation of the negative part of the signal, and intervals from 80 to 120 ms—the $\alpha$-band Posterior Dominant Rhythm—are removed before fitting. The fitted function is $y = a x^c / [1+(q-1)b x^h]^{1/(q-1)}$, where $q=1$ recovers the ordinary Boltzmann–Gibbs exponential and $q>1$ produces the heavier tails that the paper associates with long-range correlations and non-additive entropy. The machinery does the argument by converting a messy, high-dimensional EEG into one scalar per recording (per channel or per pooled cloud), whose statistical behavior can then be compared across ages, functional states, and spectral bands.

What would settle it

Take the real EEG segments, randomize the Fourier phases while preserving the power spectrum, rebuild the signal, and apply the same threshold-crossing event definition and q fit; if the surrogate q values reproduce the original q values and the same theta/beta correlations, then q is not measuring complexity beyond spectral content.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that $q$-statistics can describe human neural complexity. Using the $q$-exponential distribution fitted to the intervals between threshold-crossing events in the EEG, the paper reports three converging findings: $q$ is higher when all 20 channels are pooled than when single-channel $q$ values are averaged, $q$ is negatively correlated with age at the global level (most strongly in resting open-eyes, $r=-0.50$), and $q$ is positively correlated with theta-band power and negatively with beta1-band power across states and channels. The authors also find that functional states do not change pooled $q$, while single-channel $q$ responds to states in anatomically sensible ways, such as lower posterior $q$ with eyes closed and higher posterior $q$ during preferred music. On the strength of these patterns, the paper concludes that, as a first approach, $q$-statistics can describe human neural complexity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that q measures neural complexity itself rather than just EEG spectral composition, because the intervals q is fitted to are defined by threshold crossings whose frequency is directly shaped by low-frequency power, and the paper does not separate q from the power spectrum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $q$ is a valid complexity measure, then one fitted scalar per EEG recording can summarize system-level neural complexity without source reconstruction or explicit connectivity estimation.
  • The negative age correlation implies $q$-statistics could be used to track age-related changes in brain complexity in longitudinal or clinical settings.
  • The positive $q$–theta and negative $q$–beta1 correlations imply that complexity in this measurement is carried by slow, integrative oscillations rather than by fast, local processing.
  • The stable pooled $q$ across functional states, alongside state-dependent single-channel $q$, implies that global complexity may index stable individual characteristics while local subsystems reconfigure during tasks.
  • The higher pooled-channel $q$ relative to averaged single-channel $q$ implies that whole-brain complexity is non-additive, consistent with long-range correlations across scalp sites.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper does not perform: phase-randomize each EEG segment to preserve its power spectrum while destroying temporal structure; if $q$ and its theta/beta correlations survive, then $q$ is carrying spectral information rather than complexity.
  • Because the theta/beta1 ratio shows the strongest correlation with $q$ in the paper's table, a practical extension is to test whether that ratio alone can predict $q$ in new data; if it can, the distinct contribution of $q$ as a complexity measure would need re-evaluation.
  • The paper's own dissociation between theta power and $q$ in the Oddball state suggests $q$ may index the integration or informativeness of oscillations rather than their amplitude; a targeted test would compare $q$ across two states matched for theta power but differing in task complexity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies Tsallis q-statistics to EEG threshold-crossing interval distributions in 66 adults across seven functional states, estimating a q parameter for all channels pooled and per channel. The authors report four main findings: q is higher for all channels pooled than for the average of single channels; q is negatively correlated with age; functional states modulate q locally but not globally; and q is positively correlated with theta power and negatively with beta1 power. They interpret q as a measure of neural complexity and claim the results support q-statistics as a first approach to describing human brain complexity.

Significance. If the interpretation were fully supported, the paper would offer a relatively simple, computationally light EEG complexity index that tracks age and spectral correlates of integration, with potential clinical applications in ADHD and other neuropsychiatric conditions. The study has strengths: a reasonably sized sample (66 adults), seven well-defined functional states, openly described fitting equations and bounds, and supplementary datasets. However, the central inference that q measures neural complexity independently of the power spectrum is not established by the analyses presented, because the event intervals used to estimate q are threshold crossings of the same signal whose band powers are then correlated with q. The q–theta/q–beta1 correlations, the AllCh-versus-single-channel difference, and even the age effect can all be reproduced by spectral content alone under plausible null models. The paper would need surrogate-data or partial-correlation controls, or comparisons with established complexity measures, before its main claim can be accepted as evidence rather than as a restatement of spectral composition.

major comments (4)
  1. [Data Processing and Curve Fitting; Spectral Composition and Complexity (Table 3, Figure 8)] The q parameter is estimated from the distribution of intervals between downward crossings of a −1 SD threshold of the EEG signal. For a stationary signal, the distribution of threshold-crossing intervals is determined by the autocorrelation function and hence by the power spectrum. A theta-dominant signal will produce longer, more clustered intervals, while a beta-dominant signal will produce shorter, more regular intervals. The reported positive correlation between q and theta power and negative correlation with beta1 power may therefore be a mathematical consequence of the event definition rather than evidence about neural complexity. The manuscript provides no surrogate data analysis, no partial correlations controlling for band powers, and no comparison with other complexity measures. Since the abstract's central claim rests on these correlations, this confound is load-bearing and needs to be addressed.
  2. [Complexity (Table 1)] The finding that q(AllCh) is higher than the mean q of single channels is interpreted as evidence of nonlocal correlations. However, pooling interval distributions from 20 heterogeneous channels broadens the pooled distribution relative to each channel's distribution, which can raise the fitted q even if the channels are independent stationary processes. The analysis as presented does not control for this pooling artifact; for example, the authors do not compare the observed AllCh q with q obtained by pooling independent realizations from a single channel, or with a shuffled-channel surrogate. Without such a control, Table 1 does not by itself support the hierarchical-complexity interpretation.
  3. [Results, Sample and Table 2] The negative correlation between q and age is offered as external validation of q as a complexity measure. Since q is correlated with theta and beta1 power, and EEG spectral composition slows with age, the age–q correlation may be mediated entirely by the same spectral confound identified above. The manuscript does not report partial correlations of q with age after controlling for band powers, nor does it show that the age effect survives such controls. The age correlation is therefore not currently an independent anchor for the construct validity of q.
  4. [Results, Sample and Table 1] The exclusion procedure for AllCh fits is described as visual inspection of convergence, with 35 EEG signals of specific functional states excluded, yet Table 1 reports N = 66 for every state. The relationship between the reported N and the exclusions is unclear; if the 35 exclusions are distributed across states, the effective sample sizes in Tables 1–3 need to be stated per state. More importantly, visual post hoc exclusion of non-convergent fits can bias q estimates and inflate correlations. The authors should report the number of excluded cases per state, provide quantitative convergence criteria, and ideally rerun the main analyses with alternative exclusion rules.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'applied to the ongoing and EEG and its spectral power' appears to contain a typo; it should likely read 'applied to the ongoing EEG and its spectral power'.
  2. [Data Processing and Curve Fitting] The text states amplitudes are 'truncated at amplitudes of 100mV'; since EEG amplitudes are in microvolts, this should be '100 µV' (and likewise for the negative threshold description).
  3. [Results, Complexity] In the sentence reporting theta power differences, 't-stat=2.40m' appears to contain a typographical artifact; it should be 't-stat=2.40'.
  4. [Experimental Procedures] The ADHD screening scale is referred to as 'ARSR' in the text but is commonly abbreviated 'ASRS'; the abbreviation should be corrected for consistency with the cited instrument.
  5. [Table 3] 'alfa' should be spelled 'alpha' for consistency with the band nomenclature used elsewhere, and 'teta' should be 'theta'.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The q–theta and q–beta1 correlations are baked into the threshold-crossing interval definition, and the identification of q with neural complexity is imported from the authors' own prior work, so the central claim is only partially anchored externally.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Data Processing and Curve Fitting; Results, Spectral Composition and Complexity (Table 3)]
    "Regularities were assessed through the frequency distribution of event intervals. These events were defined when the negative amplitude of the signal exceeded the threshold of −1.0 standard deviation of the negative part of the signal ... The Pearson's correlations between absolute (δ, θ, α, β1, β2, and γ) and relative (θ/β1 or α/β1) band powers with q parameter were studied for both AllCh and each single EEG channel."

    q is fitted to the distribution of intervals between downcrossings of a fixed amplitude threshold on the same EEG record from which the band powers are derived. The paper itself links interval regularity to autocorrelation, and level-crossing interval statistics are largely controlled by the autocorrelation function, hence by the power spectrum: low-frequency (theta) content lengthens and clusters intervals, raising the fitted q; high-frequency (beta) content shortens and regularizes intervals, lowering q. The reported q–theta positive and q–beta1 negative correlations therefore restate the spectral content already embedded in the event definition rather than providing independent evidence that q measures neural complexity.

  2. self citation load bearing [Final considerations]
    "We initially sought to reaffirm the strong relationship between the parameter q (an index which qualifies the nonadditive entropy) and the NC demonstrated in our previous works [21, 23], highlighting some evidences of nonlocal correlations behavior of q and confirming the inverse relationship between age and NC, consistently with what is available in the literature."

    The construct validity of q as neural complexity is not derived in this paper; it is explicitly imported from [21,23], whose author sets overlap with the present paper. This identification is load-bearing: every correlation, channel comparison, and state effect is interpreted as a property of NC only after equating q with NC. The age correlation is an external anchor, but it shows only that q declines with age, a property shared by raw spectral measures, and cannot independently establish the q-to-NC mapping. The central interpretation thus rests on a self-citation chain rather than on an external benchmark.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Results, Complexity (Table 1); Discussion, 'NC has different characteristics at global and local levels of brain activity']
    "In all FS, the q(AllCh) was significantly higher than the average q value of the single channels (Table 1). ... The q values from all channels (AllCh) are larger than the averaged q values coming from the single channels, demonstrating that the behavior of NC is not linear amidst the parts and the whole, being larger in the latter one."

    AllCh is the interval distribution obtained by pooling all 20 single-channel interval series into one 'cloud.' Pooling heterogeneous distributions mechanically broadens the pooled interval distribution, which by itself can raise the fitted q relative to the average of the individually fitted q values, even if the channels are statistically independent. The conclusion that the difference demonstrates nonlocal correlations or hierarchical NC therefore follows only if one already assumes q is a valid complexity measure, the premise imported from the authors' prior work, and ignores the purely distributional effect of pooling. The comparison is an estimator artifact, not an independent measurement of interactions.

full rationale

The main reduction is in the operational definition of q. The paper fits q to the distribution of intervals between threshold crossings of the EEG and then correlates q with band powers computed from that same EEG. Because threshold-crossing interval statistics are largely determined by the autocorrelation function, and hence by the power spectrum, the observed q–theta positive and q–beta1 negative correlations are substantially a restatement of how the event intervals were constructed, not an independent neurophysiological discovery. The paper provides no surrogate analysis, no partial correlation controlling for band power, and no comparison with an established complexity measure, so this part of the evidence is circular in effect: the spectral content is already inside the quantity being called complexity. The identification of q with neural complexity is also explicitly imported from the authors' prior publications [21,23] rather than independently validated here, making the interpretive frame self-referential. The AllCh-versus-single-channel comparison suffers from a related problem: pooling channels broadens the fitted distribution and can raise q mechanically, so interpreting it as evidence of nonlocal correlations depends entirely on the imported q=NC premise. Some independent content remains, most notably the negative age correlation, which is anchored outside the self-citation chain. However, age-related spectral slowing could produce the same correlation, so this anchor does not fully separate q from the power spectrum. Overall, the headline claim that q-statistics can describe human neural complexity is only partially supported: one of the three main findings reduces largely to the estimator definition, and the central construct is carried by prior self-cited work. A score of 6 reflects this partial circularity rather than a fully forced derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a heavily parametrized fit (b, c, h, q) applied to event-interval histograms, plus several hand-set analysis choices (threshold, bin removal, band boundaries). The key conceptual assumption, that q is independent of spectral content, is not tested. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • q (Tsallis entropic index) = ~1.13 to 1.35 per channel/state
    The paper's measure of neural complexity; fitted to event-interval distributions via least squares with bounds [1.01, 2].
  • b (scale parameter of q-exponential) = fitted, e.g., 0.1463 in Figure 1
    Scale parameter of the q-exponential; fitted per distribution.
  • c (left-tail exponent) = fitted, e.g., 2.2473 in Figure 1
    Controls the left tail of the distribution; authors relate it to degeneracy of states.
  • h (exponent in q-exponential argument) = fitted, e.g., 1.0792 in Figure 1
    Exponent in the q-exponential; fitted per distribution.
  • Event threshold (-1.0 SD) = hand-set
    Threshold for defining inter-event intervals; no justification for this specific value.
  • PDR suppression (80-120 ms bin removal) = hand-set
    Removes posterior dominant rhythm peak before fitting; effect on q not analyzed.
  • Band power boundaries = hand-set (theta 4.19-8 Hz, beta1 15-25 Hz, etc.)
    Chosen band definitions with small gaps; affects all spectral correlations.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The probability distribution of EEG event intervals is described by the q-exponential with prefactor, Eq. (3).
    Introduced in Methods; motivated by prior work, but no goodness-of-fit statistics are reported beyond an RMSE threshold.
  • domain assumption The parameter q measures neural complexity through non-additive entropy.
    Assumed from q-statistics literature; no derivation linking q to brain complexity is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption Threshold-crossing intervals at -1.0 SD of the negative signal capture brain complexity.
    Chosen in Methods; the choice is not justified against other thresholds.
  • ad hoc to paper Suppressing the 80-120 ms PDR bins does not bias the q estimate.
    Applied to avoid PDR peak; potential effect on fitted q is not analyzed.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed q-theta and q-beta correlations reflect neural complexity rather than a mathematical coupling between interval statistics and spectral power.
    Central interpretation in Discussion; no control analysis with surrogates or partial correlations is provided.
  • domain assumption Pooling all channels into one interval distribution yields a valid global complexity measure.
    Used to compute AllCh q; mixture broadening may inflate q without indicating long-range brain correlations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neurophysiological correlates to the human brain complexity through $q$-statistical analysis of electroencephalogram." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YKQCLMDX

@misc{pith2026250206057,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neurophysiological correlates to the human brain complexity through $q$-statistical analysis of electroencephalogram},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YKQCLMDX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06057}
}
abstract

The prospects of assessing neural complexity (NC) by $q$-statistics of the systemic organization of different types and levels of brain activity were studied. In 70 adult subjects, NC was assessed via the parameter $q$ of $q$-statistics, applied to the ongoing and EEG and its spectral power of 20 scalp points (channels). The NC were estimated both globally for all channels (AllCh) and locally (for each single channel) in different Functional States (FSs). The values of $q$ was compared among FSs and single channels, as well they were correlated with the power of $\theta$ (4-8Hz), $\beta_1$ (15-25Hz) and others EEG bands, in each FS. The value of $q$ across all FSs was higher for AllCh than for the single channels FSs. Consistently with previous studies, we found a negative correlation between NC and age. The FSs did not influence the $q$ of the EEG in AllCh, although locally the FS modulated $q$ in a consistent manner (e.g., reducing $q$ in posterior sites with eyes closed). The $q$ was correlated positively with the power of the $\theta$ and negatively with that of the $\beta_1$ band in general. These findings support the idea that, as a first approach, $q$-statistics can describe the human NC. The relationship between $q$ and $\theta$ power aligns with greater NC during FSs such as listening music and resting with eyes open, which is consistent with high-order representations rather than low-informative attentional tasks (OddBall).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06057 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two examples of the q-exponential function (equation 3) fitted to empirical probability distributions of occurrence of event intervals collected from the EEG signal (all 20 channels). Each event is defined when the signal amplitude crosses down the threshold of -1.0 standard deviation of the negative part of the signal. The gray dots (event intervals between 80 and 120 ms) were removed from the fitting process becau… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Power spectra of the frequency signals (0 to 50Hz), averaged across all subjects for each functional state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The ages of the subjects negatively correlate to respective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effect of the functional state (FS) on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The t-values (t-test) for the paired comparisons of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The t-values (t-test) for the paired comparisons of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pearson correlations between θ (all FSs) and α (preferred music) relative powers and the value of the q parameter (all channels). The relative powers were obtained by dividing the absolute θ (4-8 Hz) or α (8-12 Hz) powers by the β1 (15-25 Hz) power. Correlation coeffic…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pearson correlation between the value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On the Role of Complementarity in Biogenesis: A Critical Phenomenon Approach

    Ferreira, R., Tsallis, C. On the Role of Complementarity in Biogenesis: A Critical Phenomenon Approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 117:303-317 (1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Self-Organizing Systems: The Emergence of Order

    Yates, E. Self-Organizing Systems: The Emergence of Order. New York: Springer (1987)

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    Complex systems biology

    Ma’ayan, A. Complex systems biology. Journal of the Royal Society Interface , 14(134):20170391 (2017). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0391

    work page arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Kanai, R., Tsuchiya, N. Qualia. Current Biology, 22(10):R392-R396 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.033 2012

  5. [5]

    E., Jensen, O

    Lisman, J. E., Jensen, O. The θ − γ neural code . Neuron, 77(6):1002-1016 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007. 15 Running Title for Header

    doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007 2013

  6. [6]

    K., Nordmark, J., Liljefors, J., Herman, P.Beta: bursts of cognition

    Lundqvist, M., Miller, E. K., Nordmark, J., Liljefors, J., Herman, P.Beta: bursts of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(7):662-676 (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.03.010

    doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.03.010 2024

  7. [7]

    International Journal of Psychophysiology, 157:82-99 (2020)

    Karaka¸ s, S.A review of theta oscillation and its functional correlates. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 157:82-99 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.008 2020

  8. [8]

    S., Gazzaniga, M

    Bassett, D. S., Gazzaniga, M. S. Understanding complexity in the human brain . Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5):200-209 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.006

    doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.006 2011

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Kelso, J. A. S. Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. MIT Press, Massachusetts (1995), p. 334

    1995

  2. [10]

    Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen [Further Studies on Thermal Equilibrium Between Gas Molecules]

    Boltzmann, L. Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen [Further Studies on Thermal Equilibrium Between Gas Molecules]. Wien. Ber., 66:275 (1872)

  3. [11]

    Gibbs, J. W. Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics—Developed with Especial Reference to the Rational Foundation of Thermodynamics. C. Scribner’s Sons (1902)

    1902

  4. [12]

    (eds)Nonextensive Entropy—Interdisciplinary Applications

    Gell-Mann, M., Tsallis, C. (eds)Nonextensive Entropy—Interdisciplinary Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics – Approaching a Complex World

    Tsallis, C. Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics – Approaching a Complex World. 2nd ed. Springer (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics

    Tsallis, C. Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 52:479-487 (1988)

    1988

  7. [15]

    J., Beck, C

    Mitsokapas, E., Schäfer, B., Harris, R. J., Beck, C. Statistical characterization of airplane delays . Scientific Reports, 11:7855 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    S., Malacarne, L

    Picoli, S., Mendes, R. S., Malacarne, L. C., Paupitz, R. q-distributions in complex systems: A brief review, Braz J Phys. 39(2):468-474 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Nonextensive statistical mechanics and economics

    Tsallis, C., Anteneodo, C., Borland, L., Osorio, R. Nonextensive statistical mechanics and economics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 324(1-2):89-100 (2003)

    2003

  10. [18]

    Predicting COVID-19 peaks around the world

    Tsallis, C., Tirnakli, U. Predicting COVID-19 peaks around the world. Frontiers in Physics, 8:217 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    P., Glazier, J

    Upadhyaya, A., Rieu, J. P., Glazier, J. A., Sawada, Y . Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 293(3-4):549-558 (2001)

    2001

  12. [20]

    D., Wester, R.Tunnelling measured in a very slow ion-molecule reaction

    Wild, R., Nötzold, M., Simpson, M., Tran, T. D., Wester, R.Tunnelling measured in a very slow ion-molecule reaction. Nature, (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05727-z

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    M., Tsallis, C., Lima, H

    Abramov, D. M., Tsallis, C., Lima, H. S. Neural complexity through a nonextensive statistical-mechanical approach of human electroencephalograms. Scientific Reports, 13(1):10318 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41598-023- 37219-5

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Reichl, L. E. A Modern Course in Statistical Physics. Physics Books Co., New York (2005), pp. 197-231

    2005

  15. [23]

    M., Lima, H

    Abramov, D. M., Lima, H. S., Lazarev, V ., Galhanone, P. R., Tsallis, C. Identifying attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder through the electroencephalogram complexity. Physica A, 653:130093 (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2024.130093

    2024

  16. [24]

    L., editors

    Niedermeyer, E., da Silva, F. L., editors. Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    J., van Straaten, E

    Stam, C. J., van Straaten, E. C. The organization of physiological brain networks . Clinical Neurophysiology, 123(6):1067-1087 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.011

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    A., Solomon, E

    Herweg, N. A., Solomon, E. A., Kahana, M. J.Theta Oscillations in Human Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(3):208-227 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.006

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    V .The relationship of theory and methodology in EEG studies of mental activity

    Lazarev, V . V .The relationship of theory and methodology in EEG studies of mental activity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62:384-393 (2006)

    2006

  20. [28]

    V ., Morales, S., Buzzell, G

    Tan, E., Troller-Renfree, S. V ., Morales, S., Buzzell, G. A., McSweeney, M., Antúnez, M., Fox, N. A. Theta activity and cognitive functioning: Integrating evidence from resting-state and task-related developmen- tal electroencephalography (EEG) research . Developmental Cognit...

    2024

  21. [29]

    C., Barry, R

    Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Näätänen, R., Polich, J., Rein- vang, I., Van Petten, C. Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400 . Clinical...

    2009 doi

  22. [30]

    A., Friston, K

    Vuust, P., Heggli, O. A., Friston, K. J., Kringelbach, M. L. Music in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23(5):287-305 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41583-022-00578-5

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Aging and efficiency in living systems: Complexity, adaptation and self-organization

    Chatterjee, A., Georgiev, G., Iannacchione, G. Aging and efficiency in living systems: Complexity, adaptation and self-organization. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 163:2-7 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2017.02.009

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    L., Peng, C

    Goldberger, A. L., Peng, C. K., Lipsitz, L. A. What is physiologic complexity and how does it change with aging and disease?. Neurobiology of Aging, 23(1):23-26 (2002). doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00266-4

    2002 doi

  25. [33]

    Hong, S. L. The dynamics of structural and functional complexity across the lifespan . Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 11(2):219-234 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Neuropsy- chobiology, 75(4):151-161 (2017)

    Ishii, R., Canuet, L., Aoki, Y ., Hata, M., Iwase, M., Ikeda, S., Nishida, K., Ikeda, M.Healthy and Pathological Brain Aging: From the Perspective of Oscillations, Functional Connectivity, and Signal Complexity. Neuropsy- chobiology, 75(4):151-161 (2017). doi: 10.1159/000486870

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    López Pérez, D., Bokde, A. L. W., Kerskens, C. M. Complexity analysis of heartbeat-related signals in brain MRI time series as a potential biomarker for ageing and cognitive performance. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 232(1):123-133 (2023). doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-...

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Manor, B., Lipsitz, L. A. Physiologic complexity and aging: implications for physical function and rehabilitation. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry , 45:287-293 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.08.020

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    Escala de Auto-avaliação para Diagnóstico do Transtorno de Déficit de Atenção/Hiperatividade em Adultos

    Adler, L., Kessler, R., Spencer, T. Escala de Auto-avaliação para Diagnóstico do Transtorno de Déficit de Atenção/Hiperatividade em Adultos. Harvard University, v. 1.1. www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/ncs/ftpdir/adhd/

  30. [38]

    A., Rudin, C., Faraone, S

    Ustun, B., Adler, L. A., Rudin, C., Faraone, S. V ., Spencer, T. J., Berglund, P., Gruber, M. J., Kessler, R. C.The World Health Organization Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(5):520-527 (2017). doi: 10.10...

    2017

  31. [39]

    The Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s Version (AQ-Child)

    Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Allison, C. The Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s Version (AQ-Child). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7):1230-1240 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10803-007- 0504-z

    2008 doi

  32. [40]

    S., Hino, A

    Reis, R. S., Hino, A. A. F., Rodrigues-Anez, C. R. Perceived Stress Scale: Reliability and Validity Study in Brazil. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(1):107-114 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Pearson Clinical Brasil (2004)

    Wechsler, D.WAIS-III - Escala Wechsler de Inteligência para Adultos: manual técnico. Pearson Clinical Brasil (2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    Neuron, 111(16):2469-2487 (2023)

    Menon, V .20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis. Neuron, 111(16):2469-2487 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.023

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    Raichle, M. E. The brain’s default mode network . Annual Review of Neuroscience , 38:433-447 (2015). doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    L., Amaral, L

    Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. Ch., Peng, C. K., Stanley, H. E.Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterations with disease and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(Suppl 1):2466-2472 (2002). doi...

    2002 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Ponce-Meza, J

    Hernández, R. M., Ponce-Meza, J. C., Saavedra-López, M. Á., Campos Ugaz, W. A., Chanduvi, R. M., Monteza, W. C. Brain Complexity and Psychiatric Disorders. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 18(4):493-502 (2023). doi: 10.18502/ijps.v18i4.13637

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    C., Tsai, S

    Yang, A. C., Tsai, S. J.Is mental illness complex? From behavior to brain. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 45:42-53 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.09.015

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    V ., Gómez-Ariza, C

    Aguerre, N. V ., Gómez-Ariza, C. J., Ibáñez-Molina, A. J., Bajo, M. T. Electrophysiological correlates of dispositional mindfulness: A quantitative and complexity EEG study. British Journal of Psychology, 114(3):566- 579 (2023). doi: 10.1111/bjop.12636

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    S., Dougherty, D

    Gu, C., Chou, T., Widge, A. S., Dougherty, D. D. EEG complexity in emotion conflict task in individuals with psychiatric disorders. Behavioural Brain Research, 467:114997 (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114997

    2024

  41. [49]

    X., Woltering, S

    Gu, C., Liu, Z. X., Woltering, S. Electroencephalography complexity in resting and task states in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brain Communications, 4(2):fcac054 (2022). doi: 10.1093/brain- comms/fcac054

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Brain Complexity in Children with Mild and Severe Autism Spectrum Disorders: Analysis of Multiscale Entropy in EEG

    Hadoush, H., Alafeef, M., Abdulhay, E. Brain Complexity in Children with Mild and Severe Autism Spectrum Disorders: Analysis of Multiscale Entropy in EEG. Brain Topography, 32(5):914-921 (2019). doi: 10.1007/s10548- 019-00711-1. 17 Running Title for Header

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    J., Pham, T., Chen, S

    Lau, Z. J., Pham, T., Chen, S. H. A., Makowski, D. Brain entropy, fractal dimensions and predictability: A review of complexity measures for EEG in healthy and neuropsychiatric populations. European Journal of Neuroscience, 56(7):5047-5069 (2022). doi: 10.1111/ejn.15800

    2022 doi

  44. [52]

    Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(10):2070-2077 (2017)

    Seeck, M., Koessler, L., Bast, T., Leijten, F., Michel, C., Baumgartner, C., Beniczky, S.The standardized EEG elec- trode array of the IFCN. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(10):2070-2077 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.254

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Hanlon, C

    Hogeveen, J., Medalla, M., Ainsworth, M., Galeazzi, J. M., Hanlon, C. A., Mansouri, F. A., Costa, V . D. What Does the Frontopolar Cortex Contribute to Goal-Directed Cognition and Action?. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(45):8508-8513 (2022). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1143-22.2022

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    L., Rolls, E

    Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T. The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: ev- idence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology . Progress in Neurobiology , 72(5):341-372 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.006

    2004 doi

  47. [55]

    A., Koechlin, E., Rosa, M

    Mansouri, F. A., Koechlin, E., Rosa, M. G. P., Buckley, M. J. Managing competing goals - a key role for the frontopolar cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(11):645-657 (2017). doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.111

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    M., Nguyen, D

    Pana, R. M., Nguyen, D. K. Anterior Cingulate Epilepsy: A Review . Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology , 40(6):501-506 (2023). doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000973

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    B., Mohlberg, H., Gerboga, F., Caspers, S., Amunts, K.Cytoarchitectonic Characterization and Functional Decoding of Four New Areas in the Human Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex

    Wojtasik, M., Bludau, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Mohlberg, H., Gerboga, F., Caspers, S., Amunts, K.Cytoarchitectonic Characterization and Functional Decoding of Four New Areas in the Human Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 14:2 (2020). doi: 10.3389/fnana.2020.00002

    2020

  50. [58]

    A., Macaluso, E

    Foudil, S. A., Macaluso, E. The influence of the precuneus on the medial temporal cortex determines the subjective quality of memory during the retrieval of naturalistic episodes. Scientific Reports, 14(1):7943 (2024). doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58298-y

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    S., Ritchey, M., Fernyhough, C

    Simons, J. S., Ritchey, M., Fernyhough, C. Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Subjective Experience of Remem- bering. Annual Review of Psychology, 73:159-186 (2022). doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-030221-025439

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    Cohen, Y . E. Multimodal activity in the parietal cortex . Hearing Research, 258(1-2):100-105 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.011

    2009 doi

  53. [61]

    Mesulam, M. M. From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121(Pt 6):1013-1052 (1998). doi: 10.1093/brain/121.6.1013

    1998 doi

  54. [62]

    Leech, R., Saygin, A. P. Distributed processing and cortical specialization for speech and environmental sounds in human temporal cortex. Brain and Language, 116(2):83-90 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.11.001

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    Brain Lateralization: A Comparative Perspective

    Güntürkün, O., Ströckens, F., Ocklenburg, S. Brain Lateralization: A Comparative Perspective. Physiological Reviews, 100(3):1019-1063 (2019). doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    Zatorre, R. J. Hemispheric asymmetries for music and speech: Spectrotemporal modulations and top-down influences. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16:1075511 (2022). doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1075511

    2022

  57. [65]

    McNaughton, N., Vann, S. D. Construction of complex memories via parallel distributed cortical-subcortical iterative integration. Trends in Neurosciences, 45(7):550-562 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.04.006

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    Low frequency oscillations drive EEG’s complexity changes during wakefulness and sleep

    González, J., Mateos, D., Cavelli, M., Mondino, A., Pascovich, C., Torterolo, P., Rubido, N. Low frequency oscillations drive EEG’s complexity changes during wakefulness and sleep. Neuroscience, 494:1-11 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.04.025

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    Cortical networks complexity in EEG theta rhythm during silent reading in children with dyslexia

    Stokic, M., Milosavljevic, Z., Pecenica, D., Subotic, M. Cortical networks complexity in EEG theta rhythm during silent reading in children with dyslexia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123(7):e85 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    Bhattacharya, J., Lee, E. J. Modulation of EEG Theta Band Signal Complexity by Music Therapy. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 26(01):1650001 (2016). doi: 10.1142/s0218127416500012

    2016 doi

  61. [69]

    Theta oscillations in the hippocampus

    Buzsáki, G. Theta oscillations in the hippocampus . Neuron, 33(3):325-340 (2002). doi: 10.1016/s0896- 6273(02)00586-x

    2002 doi

  62. [70]

    Neural circuits underlying the generation of theta oscillations

    Pignatelli, M., Beyeler, A., Leinekugel, X. Neural circuits underlying the generation of theta oscillations. Journal of Physiology Paris, 106(3-4):81-92 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.09.007

    2012 doi

  63. [71]

    Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94(3):175-182 (1995)

    Fernández, T., Harmony, T., Rodríguez, M., Bernal, J., Silva, J., Reyes, A., Marosi, E.EEG activation patterns during the performance of tasks involving different components of mental calculation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94(3):175-182 (1995). doi: ...

    1995 doi

  64. [72]

    H.Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles

    Pfurtscheller, G., Lopes da Silva, F. H.Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110:1842-1857 (1999). doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8

    1999 doi

  65. [73]

    Influence of phosphatidylserine on cognitive performance and cortical activity after induced stress

    Baumeister J, Barthel T, Geiss KR, Weiss M. Influence of phosphatidylserine on cognitive performance and cortical activity after induced stress. Nutritional Neuroscience. 11:103–110 (2008). doi: 10.1179/147683008X301478 18 Running Title for Header

    2008 doi

  66. [74]

    T., Tipper, C

    Grafton, S. T., Tipper, C. M.Decoding intention: A neuroergonomic perspective. NeuroImage, 59:14-24 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.064

    2012 doi

  67. [75]

    W., Watson, B., Cross, N., Wang, D., Coeytaux, A., Bartlett, D., Wong, K., Grunstein, R

    Vakulin, A., D’Rozario, A., Kim, J. W., Watson, B., Cross, N., Wang, D., Coeytaux, A., Bartlett, D., Wong, K., Grunstein, R. Quantitative sleep EEG and polysomnographic predictors of driving simulator performance in obstructive sleep apnea. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(2):142...

    2016 doi

  68. [76]

    A., Veselis, R

    Feshchenko, V . A., Veselis, R. A., Reinsel, R. A. Comparison of the EEG effects of midazolam, thiopen- tal, and propofol: the role of underlying oscillatory systems . Neuropsychobiology, 35:211-220 (1997). doi: 10.1159/000119347

    1997 doi

  69. [77]

    M., Asano, E

    Nishida, M., Zestos, M. M., Asano, E. Spatial-temporal patterns of electrocorticographic spectral changes during midazolam sedation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127:1223-1232 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.10.044

    2016 doi

  70. [78]

    Event related synchronization (ERS): an electrophysiological correlate of cortical areas at rest

    Pfurtscheller, G. Event related synchronization (ERS): an electrophysiological correlate of cortical areas at rest. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 83:62-69 (1992)

    1992

  71. [79]

    K., Fries, P

    Engel, A. K., Fries, P. Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo? . Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2):156-165 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015. 19

    2010 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.