Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 107 references

Advancements in Functorial Homological Mirror Symmetry

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the failure of the Donaldson-Thomas degeneracy formula to guarantee transversality for non-ideal sheaves is the same failure as the absence of a nonabelian virtual fundamental class in Rozansky-Witten theory.

desk verdict A useful roadmap, not a research result: the central link between stability/transversality and nonabelian gauging is asserted, not derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06951 v4 pith:PV2SZPTX submitted 2025-02-10 hep-th math-phmath.AGmath.MPmath.SG

Veronica Pasquarella This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.AGmath.MPmath.SG
keywords homologicalmirrorsymmetryDonaldson-ThomasinvariantsRozansky-WittentheoryvirtualfundamentalclassTyurindegenerationshiftedsymplecticstructuresCoulombbranchestopologicalstring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a stubborn technical obstruction in enumerative geometry—the failure of the Donaldson-Thomas degeneracy formula, which governs counts of stable sheaves when a threefold splits into pieces, to keep stability and transversality together when sheaves are not ideal—is the same obstruction that blocks nonabelian gauge symmetry in a three-dimensional topological field theory. The paper's central claim is that the missing ingredient in both settings is a nonabelian virtual fundamental class, the homology class that makes a count of geometric objects well-defined even when the moduli space is singular. If the claim is right, counting stable sheaves on glued Calabi-Yau threefolds and counting BPS black-hole microstates in string theory would both require one new piece of mathematics: a virtual fundamental class that exists when the gauge symmetry is nonabelian. The paper does not construct that class; it identifies where the construction must live and why the standard tools built from shifted symplectic structures stop at the abelian case.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the categorified Donaldson-Thomas degeneracy formula for a Tyurin degeneration, written in the paper as Eqs. (3.36)-(3.43). A Tyurin degeneration splits a Calabi-Yau threefold into two Fano varieties meeting along an anticanonical divisor; the formula identifies the virtual class of curves in the original threefold with the virtual class of a fiber product of moduli spaces on the two pieces, the identification holding by deformation invariance. For ideal sheaves the numerical data factorises cleanly between the two pieces and the intersection is transverse; for non-ideal sheaves the splitting of a sheaf develops a nonzero torsion term, so the transverse intersection fails and one must pass to derived intersection theory. The paper reads this torsion as the signature of nonabelian gauging: in the abelian Rozansky-Witten setup a symmetric obstruction theory supplies a virtual fundamental class through the square-root virtual pullback, while in the nonabelian setup the two projections in the relevant correspondence are not isomorphic, so no such pullback exists. The missing object that the argument points to is a nonabelian virtual fundamental class, together with the enlarged Fukaya category whose Lagrangian intersections would define it.

What would settle it

Compute both sides of the degeneracy formula, Eqs. (3.36) and (3.43), for a concrete Tyurin degeneration of a quintic threefold with a non-ideal sheaf whose splitting has nonzero torsion; if the two sides disagree, the formula from [88] fails and the paper's dictionary between transversality and nonabelian gauging cannot hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's finding is a dictionary between two stubborn facts. On the enumerative side, when a Calabi-Yau threefold degenerates into two Fano pieces glued along an anticanonical divisor, the Donaldson-Thomas degeneracy formula can hold with stability and transversality together for ideal sheaves, but for non-ideal sheaves the sheaf-splitting short exact sequence develops a nonzero torsion term and transversality fails. On the field-theory side, coupling the three-dimensional Rozansky-Witten theory to a gauge group in the abelian case admits a symmetric obstruction theory and hence a virtual fundamental class, while the nonabelian case involves two non-isomorphic projections and no virtual fundamental class is defined. The paper asserts that these are not parallel problems but the same problem: the degeneracy formula's failure to hold stability and transversality together for non-ideal sheaves is the nonabelian case of Rozansky-Witten gauging, and the missing ingredient in both is a nonabelian virtual fundamental class. The claim is offered as a research finding and as a program; the enlarged Fukaya category expected to carry the missing class is posited but not constructed.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central claim rests on a referenced formula for Donaldson-Thomas invariants of non-ideal sheaves that is listed as 'to appear'; if that formula does not exist or does not apply to non-ideal sheaves, the claimed link to nonabelian gauge symmetry has no basis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the correspondence holds, every example where the Donaldson-Thomas degeneracy formula fails for non-ideal sheaves is also an example where nonabelian Rozansky-Witten invariants lack a virtual fundamental class.
  • The abelian case already extends the degeneracy formula past ideal sheaves, and the paper credits that extension to a single deformation-quantisation step, making gauging and deformation quantisation the same operation in the abelian sector.
  • A constructed nonabelian virtual fundamental class would make the degeneracy formula valid for non-ideal sheaves and would yield an enlarged Fukaya category whose Lagrangian intersections foliate the Coulomb branch of the associated three-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theory.
  • On the physics side, the missing class corresponds to new fields beyond the D4-D2-D0 brane system, so black-hole microstate counting would acquire nonabelian contributions not visible in the current abelian calculation.
  • Moore-Tachikawa varieties, as the two-dimensional boundary of the three-dimensional Rozansky-Witten theory, are the natural home for this extension; classifying their two-dimensional TFTs by Coulomb branches is the paper's proposed route to functorial homological mirror symmetry for singular varieties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One concrete test the paper does not perform: take a quintic Tyurin degeneration and a non-ideal sheaf where the torsion term in Eq. (3.39) is nonzero, and compute whether the two sides of the degeneracy formula differ by exactly the correction that nonabelian holonomy would contribute in the q-deformed Yang-Mills partition function.
  • The paper's dictionary suggests a classification principle the author leaves implicit: ideal sheaves correspond to abelian sectors and non-ideal sheaves to nonabelian sectors; one could try to define a 'nonabelian stability' whose semistable objects are precisely the non-ideal sheaves.
  • If the enlarged Fukaya category exists, its Hochschild cohomology should recover the full Coulomb-branch algebra of the associated three-dimensional theory, not just the abelian part; this is a testable prediction for the Coulomb-branch construction.
  • The cobordism calculations in the paper evaluate topological string amplitudes at critical points of a Morse function; the author's own remark suggests that amplitudes at non-critical points of the flow should carry the nonabelian information, which would give a physical handle on the missing virtual class.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that a categorified Donaldson-Thomas degeneracy formula for non-ideal sheaves, attributed to Katzarkov, Kontsevich, and Sheshmani [88], corresponds to nonabelian gauging in Rozansky-Witten theory, and that functorial homological mirror symmetry must be enlarged by abelianisation, an enlarged Fukaya category, and a nonabelian virtual fundamental class. It reviews symmetric obstruction theories, Tyurin degenerations, perturbative topological string theory, cohomological field theories, Moore-Tachikawa varieties, and abelianisation, and it concludes with the stated research programme. The central claim is asserted rather than derived, and the key objects needed to substantiate it are deferred to unpublished or ongoing work.

Significance. If the proposed link between stability/transversality of non-ideal sheaves and nonabelian gauging in Rozansky-Witten theory were established, it could genuinely advance the functorial formulation of homological mirror symmetry and its string-theory applications. The paper also honestly delineates open problems and collects a broad set of relevant background results. However, as submitted, no theorem, proof, or calculation establishes the central claim, and the crucial nonabelian virtual fundamental class, the enlarged Fukaya category, and the derivation connecting Eq. (3.43) to two distinct "?Coh(X)" objects are all either admitted to be missing or relegated to unpublished work. The expository value is real, but the paper does not meet the standard of a research article claiming a main finding.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 1 and Section 7] The stated "main finding" is an assertion, not a result. No theorem, proof, or calculation links the degeneracy formula for non-ideal sheaves to nonabelian gauging in the Rozansky-Witten setup. The paper's own Section 6.3, point 1, says "We need to understand how the virtual fundamental class can be defined in the nonabelian case," and the Conclusions state that work on the nonabelian counterpart is ongoing. Since the claimed finding is explicitly identified as open, the central claim is not established in this manuscript.
  2. [Section 3.1.1, Eq. (3.43)] The glued virtual class entering the degeneracy formula is defined by deformation invariance and is attributed to reference [88], which is listed only as "to appear" with no title or arXiv identifier. The text states that for non-ideal sheaves the ordinary degeneracy technique fails and one must resort to derived intersection theory from [88]. Because the paper gives no independent derivation and the referenced work is unpublished, the central premise of the paper is not checkable from the manuscript alone.
  3. [Section 6.2.1 and Section 6.3] Only the abelian symmetric obstruction theory virtual class is constructed, in Eq. (6.16). Section 6.3, point 4, admits that shifted symplectic structures do not provide the answer for the nonabelian setup, and point 1 states that the virtual fundamental class in the nonabelian case still needs to be understood. Thus the very object needed to support the claimed relation between non-ideal sheaves and nonabelian gauging is absent, and no argument is given that such an object would satisfy Eq. (3.43).
  4. [Section 6.2, Eq. (6.5)] The paper asserts that the presence of two distinct projections in Eq. (6.5) prevents a direct morphism between the relevant spaces and implies that the KRS-objects involve two distinct "?Coh(X)" categories, but it does not derive how these two projections correspond to the two sides of the degeneracy formula. Similarly, the correspondence "Gauging <-> deformation quantisation" in Eq. (1.1) is posited rather than proved. This step is load-bearing for the claimed identification and needs a concrete derivation or a precise theorem.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.2)] Equation (4.2) reads "deg(L1)+deg(L1) = -chi(Sigma_g)", which as written is a tautological constraint; it should presumably read "deg(L1)+deg(L2)". Please correct this typo.
  2. [Section 6.2] The notation "?Coh(X)" appears in the text and in a footnote before the concept is discussed in Section 6.2.1, and the subsection heading is not followed by an explicit definition of the notation itself. Please define "?Coh(X)" at first use.
  3. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typos that impede readability, including "symeplectic", "copleteness", "wasy", "degeracy", "Fukawa", "Lagrnagian", "homolorphic", "extented", and "ranches". A thorough proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [Reference [88]] Reference [88] is load-bearing for the central claim but is cited only as "to appear" with no title, authors' initials, or preprint identifier. A complete citation, or an indication that the result is available elsewhere, is necessary for the reader to assess the dependence.
  5. [Figures and cross-references] There are cross-reference problems: the caption of Figure 10 refers to "the LHS of figure 10" and "the RHS of figure 10" within its own caption, and Section 5.2 refers to "figure 10" where a different figure appears to be meant. Please renumber and clarify the figure references.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity is present: the central claim is asserted but not derived, and the only self-citation is peripheral.

full rationale

Walking the paper's derivation chain discloses no step in which a claimed prediction or first-principles result is identical by construction to a fitted input or to a load-bearing self-citation. The central claim, stated in Section 1 and the Conclusions, is that stability and transversality in the degeneracy formula for non-ideal sheaves correspond to abelian versus nonabelian gauging in the Rozansky-Witten setup, but this is asserted rather than derived: Section 6.3, point 1, explicitly says "We need to understand how the virtual fundamental class can be defined in the nonabelian case," point 4 says shifted symplectic structures do not provide the answer, and the Conclusions describe work on the nonabelian counterpart as ongoing. The non-ideal-sheaf degeneracy formula is imported from Katzarkov-Kontsevich-Sheshmani [88], listed as "to appear"; reliance on an unpublished external work is an evidentiary gap, not a circular reduction, because that cited result is not an input of the present paper and is not being redisguised as an output. The only self-citation is [94], invoked for the peripheral technical point that the identity bordism must be removed for hyperkähler quotients in the Moore-Tachikawa functor; this point is not load-bearing for the main claim and no conclusion is forced by it. There are no fitted parameters, no predictions that reduce to their fitting data, and no author-imported uniqueness theorem. The fair verdict is no significant circularity, with the important caveat that the central claim is unsupported rather than circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper introduces no numerical parameters fitted to data and no new physical entities, so its free-parameter count is zero. It relies instead on a chain of imported mathematical structures, most centrally the unpublished categorified DT degeneracy formula of [88], and it posits two missing constructions, new Lagrangian submanifolds and a nonabelian virtual fundamental class, that are not independently evidenced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Functorial HMS: the derived Fukaya category is equivalent to the derived category of coherent sheaves, and this equivalence is functorial via Fourier-Mukai transforms.
    Invoked throughout, e.g., Eq. (A.1) and (A.2), and used to translate A-model and B-model statements in Sections 3, 5 and 6. It is the framework being extended, not proved here.
  • standard math PTVV shifted symplectic structures: mapping stacks transpose n-shifted symplectic forms, and Lagrangian intersections produce (n-1)-shifted symplectic structures.
    Section 2.1.1 Theorems 1 to 3 are imported from the published work [69] and treated as background.
  • domain assumption Tyurin degeneration: a CY threefold degenerating into two Fano varieties glued along an anticanonical divisor is analogous to gluing oriented manifolds with boundary.
    Section 3.1, Eq. (3.30) to (3.33), imported from [99] and [100], underlies the factorisation formula (3.36).
  • ad hoc to paper The categorified DT degeneracy formula for non-ideal sheaves by Katzarkov, Kontsevich and Sheshmani is correct and applicable.
    Section 3.1.1, Eq. (3.38) to (3.43), defines the glued virtual class via deformation invariance. This is the central input for the main finding, but [88] is listed as 'to appear' and cannot be checked.
  • domain assumption Moore-Tachikawa axioms: KW_G(T*G) is isomorphic to G x K and KW_{G x G}(T*G) to Z_G, as stated in Eq. (5.40).
    Section 5.2 notes these equivalences are taken by Moore and Tachikawa as axioms for constructing the 2D TFT.
  • domain assumption Coulomb branches of 3D N=4 SCFTs classify 2D TFTs, following Teleman, Xie-Yau, and Braverman-Finkelberg-Nakajima.
    Sections 5.3 and 6.1 use this as background to argue the Moore-Tachikawa functor becomes well-defined once the Coulomb branch is identified.
invented entities (2)
  • Enlarged Fukaya category with new Lagrangian submanifolds
    purpose: To provide a preferred foliation of the BFN or Coulomb branch space in the nonabelian HMS setup.
    Section 6.1 and 6.3 propose introducing new Lagrangians whose pairwise intersections foliate the Coulomb branch; no construction, invariants, or examples are given.
  • Nonabelian virtual fundamental class
    purpose: To define DT invariants in the nonabelian setup where two distinct '?CohpXq' are involved and no single deformation-quantisation step exists.
    Section 6.3 lists it as the main open problem and states the paper is currently working toward it; the object is posited but not constructed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advancements in Functorial Homological Mirror Symmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PV2SZPTX

@misc{pith2026250206951,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advancements in Functorial Homological Mirror Symmetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PV2SZPTX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06951}
}
read the original abstract

Mostly inspired by recent work by Katzarkov, Kontsevich, and Sheshmani, combined with previous work by Aganagic, Ooguri, Saulina and Vafa with regard to BPS black hole microstate counting in terms of topological field theory calculations, we will show how these tools can be applied to concrete setups arising from String Theory, and why the formalism of functorial Homological Mirror Symmetry needs to be further developed. A crucial ingredient will turn out being cobordism techniques for evaluating invariants.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [88]

    Katzarkov, M

    L. Katzarkov, M. Kontsevich, A. Sheshmani,to appear

  2. [1]

    E. Witten. Two dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space. Survey in Diff. Geom. 1 (1991), 243-310, DOI: 10.4310/SDG.1990.v1.n1.a5

    doi:10.4310/sdg.1990.v1.n1.a5 1991

  3. [2]

    Kontsevich (1995).Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry

    M. Kontsevich (1995).Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry. In: Chatterji, S.D. (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Birkh¨ auser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9078-6 11

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9078-6 1995

  4. [3]

    Strominger, S.-T

    A. Strominger, S.-T. Yau, E. Zaslow, Mirror symmetry is T-duality, Nuclear Physics B, Volume 479, Issues 1–2, 1996, Pages 243-259, ISSN 0550-3213, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00434-8

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00434-8 1996

  5. [4]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Cohomological Hall algebra, exponential Hodge structures and motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.5(2011), 231-352 doi:10.4310/CNTP.2011.v5.n2.a1 [arXiv:1006.2706 [math.AG]]

    arXiv 2011

  6. [5]

    Motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants: summary of results

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants: Summary of results, [arXiv:0910.4315 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0910.4315 . – 35 –

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0910.4315

  7. [6]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations, [arXiv:0811.2435 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0811.2435

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0811.2435

  8. [7]

    Katzarkov, M

    L. Katzarkov, M. Kontsevich and T. Pantev,Hodge theoretic aspects of mirror symmetry, Proc. Symp. Pure Math.78(2008), 87-174 doi:10.1090/pspum/078/2483750 [arXiv:0806.0107 [math.AG]]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 107 references
  1. [8]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Notes on A8-Algebras, A8-Categories and Non-Commutative Geometry, Lect. Notes Phys.757(2009), 153-220 doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68030-7 6 [arXiv:math/0606241 [math.RA]]

    2009 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Kontsevich,Deformation quantization of algebraic varieties, Lett

    M. Kontsevich,Deformation quantization of algebraic varieties, Lett. Math. Phys.56(2006), 271-294 doi:10.1023/A:1017957408559 [arXiv:math/0106006 [math.AG]]

    2006 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Y. j. Chen, M. Kontsevich and A. S. Schwarz,Symmetries of WDVV equations, Nucl. Phys. B730(2005), 352-363 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.09.025 [arXiv:hep-th/0508221 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Fronsdal and M

    C. Fronsdal and M. Kontsevich,Quantization on curves, Lett. Math. Phys.79(2007), 109-129 doi:10.1007/s11005-006-0137-8 [arXiv:math-ph/0507021 [math-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations, [arXiv:math/0011041 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0011041

    doi arXiv

  6. [13]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Deformations of algebras over operads and Deligne’s conjecture, [arXiv:math/0001151 [math.QA]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0001151

    doi arXiv

  7. [14]

    Kontsevich,Operads and motives in deformation quantization, Lett

    M. Kontsevich,Operads and motives in deformation quantization, Lett. Math. Phys.48 (1999), 35-72 doi:10.1023/A:1007555725247 [arXiv:math/9904055 [math]]

    1999 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Barannikov and M

    S. Barannikov and M. Kontsevich,Frobenius Manifolds and Formality of Lie Algebras of Polyvector Fields, doi:10.1155/S1073792898000166 [arXiv:alg-geom/9710032 [math.AG]]

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kontsevich,Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds

    M. Kontsevich,Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. 1., Lett. Math. Phys.66 (2003), 157-216 doi:10.1023/B:MATH.0000027508.00421.bf [arXiv:q-alg/9709040 [math.QA]]

    2003

  10. [17]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. I. Manin,Quantum cohomology of a product, Invent. Math.124 (1996), 313-339 doi:10.1007/s002220050055 [arXiv:q-alg/9502009 [math.QA]]

    1996 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Manin,Gromov-Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enumerative geometry, Commun. Math. Phys.164(1994), 525-562 doi:10.1007/BF02101490 [arXiv:hep-th/9402147 [hep-th]]

    1994 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Hosono, T

    S. Hosono, T. J. Lee, B. H. Lian and S. T. Yau,Mirror symmetry for double cover Calabi–Yau varieties, J. Diff. Geom.127(2024) no.1, 409-431 doi:10.4310/jdg/1717356161 [arXiv:2003.07148 [math.AG]]

    2024

  13. [20]

    B. H. Lian and S. T. Yau,Period Integrals of CY and General Type Complete Intersections, Invent. Math.191(2013), 1 doi:10.1007/s00222-012-0391-6 [arXiv:1105.4872 [math.AG]]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Hosono, B

    S. Hosono, B. H. Lian, K. Oguiso and S. T. Yau,Fourier-Mukai partners of a K3 surface of Picard number one, [arXiv:math/0211249 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0211249

    doi arXiv

  15. [22]

    Hosono, B

    S. Hosono, B. H. Lian, K. Oguiso and S. T. Yau,Fourier-Mukai number of a K3 surface, [arXiv:math/0202014 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0202014

    doi arXiv

  16. [23]

    B. H. Lian, C. H. Liu, K. f. Liu and S. T. Yau,The S**1 fixed points in Quot schemes and – 36 – mirror principle computations, [arXiv:math/0111256 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0111256

    doi arXiv

  17. [24]

    B. H. Lian, L. Kefeng and S. T. Yau,A Survey of Mirror Principle, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.33(2002), 3-10, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0010064

    2002 doi arXiv

  18. [25]

    B. H. Lian, A. Todorov and S. T. Yau,Maximal unipotent monodromy for complete intersection CY manifolds, [arXiv:math/0008061 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0008061

    doi arXiv

  19. [26]

    B. H. Lian, C. H. Liu and S. T. Yau,A Reconstruction of Euler data, [arXiv:math/0003071 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0003071

    doi arXiv

  20. [27]

    B. H. Lian, K. F. Liu and S. T. Yau,Mirror principle. 2., Asian J. Math.3(1999), 109-146, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/9905006

    1999 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    B. H. Lian, K. Liu and S. T. Yau,The Candelas-de la Ossa-Green-Parkes formula, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.67(1998), 106-114 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(98)00126-1

    1998 doi

  22. [30]

    B. H. Lian, K. F. Liu and S. T. Yau,Mirror principle. 1., Asian J. Math.1(1997), 729-763, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.alg-geom/9712011

    1997 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Seidel,FukayaA 8-structures associated to Lefschetz fibrations

    P. Seidel,FukayaA 8-structures associated to Lefschetz fibrations. III, J. Diff. Geom.117 (2021) no.3, 485-589 doi:10.4310/jdg/1615487005

    2021

  24. [32]

    Seidel,Formal groups and quantum cohomology, Geom

    P. Seidel,Formal groups and quantum cohomology, Geom. Topol.27(2023) no.8, 2937-3060 doi:10.2140/gt.2023.27.2937 [arXiv:1910.08990 [math.SG]]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Seidel,FukayaA 8-categories associated to Lefschetz fibrations

    P. Seidel,FukayaA 8-categories associated to Lefschetz fibrations. II½, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.20(2016), 883-944 doi:10.4310/ATMP.2016.v20.n4.a5 [arXiv:1404.1352 [math.SG]]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Seidel,Lagrangian homology spheres inpA mqMilnor fibres, [arXiv:1202.1955 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.1955

    P. Seidel,Lagrangian homology spheres inpA mqMilnor fibres, [arXiv:1202.1955 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.1955

    1955 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Seidel,FukayaA 8-structures associated to Lefschetz fibrations, I, J

    P. Seidel,FukayaA 8-structures associated to Lefschetz fibrations, I, J. Symplectic Geom.10 (2012) no.3, 325-388 doi:10.4310/jsg.2012.v10.n3.a1 [arXiv:0912.3932 [math.SG]]

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Seidel,Homological mirror symmetry for the quartic surface, [arXiv:math/0310414 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0310414

    P. Seidel,Homological mirror symmetry for the quartic surface, [arXiv:math/0310414 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0310414

    doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Abouzaid, S

    M. Abouzaid, S. Ganatra, H. Iritani and N. Sheridan,The Gamma and Strominger–Yau–Zaslow conjectures : a tropical approach to periods, Geom. Topol.24(2020) no.5, 2547-2602 doi:10.2140/gt.2020.24.2547 [arXiv:1809.02177 [math.AG]]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Abouzaid and C

    M. Abouzaid and C. Manolescu,A sheaf-theoretic model for SL(2,C) Floer homology, J. Eur. Math. Soc.22(2020) no.11, 3641-3695 doi:10.4171/jems/994 [arXiv:1708.00289 [math.GT]]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Abouzaid, D

    M. Abouzaid, D. Auroux and L. Katzarkov,Lagrangian fibrations on blowups of toric varieties and mirror symmetry for hypersurfaces., Publ. Math. , Inst. Hautes ´Etud. Sci.123 (2016), 199-282 doi:10.1007/s10240-016-0081-9

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    Abouzaid and I

    M. Abouzaid and I. Smith,Khovanov homology from Floer cohomology, J. Am. Math. Soc. 32(2019) no.1, 1-79 doi:10.1090/jams/902 [arXiv:1504.01230 [math.SG]]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Abouzaid, D

    M. Abouzaid, D. Auroux, A. I. Efimov, L. Katzarkov and D. Orlov,Homological mirror symmetry for punctured spheres, J. Am. Math. Soc.26(2013) no.4, 1051-1083 doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-2013-00770-5 – 37 –

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    Bocklandt and M

    R. Bocklandt and M. Abouzaid,Noncommutative mirror symmetry for punctured surfaces, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.368(2016) no.1, 429-469 doi:10.1090/tran/6375 [arXiv:1111.3392 [math.AG]]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Abouzaid and P

    M. Abouzaid and P. Seidel,Altering symplectic manifolds by homologous recombination, [arXiv:1007.3281 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1007.3281

    doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Abouzaid and M

    M. Abouzaid and M. Boyarchenko,Local structure of generalized complex manifolds, [arXiv:math/0412084 [math.DG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0412084

    doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    Auroux, A

    D. Auroux, A. I. Efimov and L. Katzarkov,Lagrangian Floer theory for trivalent graphs and homological mirror symmetry for curves, Selecta Math.30(2024) no.5, 95 doi:10.1007/s00029-024-00988-6

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Cavenaghi, L

    L. Cavenaghi, L. Grama and L. Katzarkov,New look at Milnor Spheres, [arXiv:2404.19088 [math.DG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.19088

    doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    R. P. Horja and L. Katzarkov,Discriminants and toric K-theory, Adv. Math.453(2024), 109831 doi:10.1016/j.aim.2024.109831 [arXiv:2205.00903 [math.AG]]

    2024

  40. [48]

    Haiden, L

    F. Haiden, L. Katzarkov and C. Simpson,Spectral Networks and Stability Conditions for Fukaya Categories with Coefficients, Commun. Math. Phys.405(2024) no.11, 264 doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05138-9 [arXiv:2112.13623 [math.AG]]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Katzarkov, E

    L. Katzarkov, E. Lupercio, L. Meersseman and A. Verjovsky,Quantum (non-commutative) toric geometry: Foundations, Adv. Math.391(2021), 107945 doi:10.1016/j.aim.2021.107945

    2021

  42. [50]

    Borisov, L

    D. Borisov, L. Katzarkov, A. Sheshmani and S. T. Yau,Strictification and gluing of Lagrangian distributions on derived schemes with shifted symplectic forms, Adv. Math.438 (2024), 109477 doi:10.1016/j.aim.2023.109477 [arXiv:1908.00651 [math.AG]]

    2024

  43. [51]

    Kasprzyk, L

    A. Kasprzyk, L. Katzarkov, V. Przyjalkowski and D. Sakovics,Projecting Fanos in the mirror, [arXiv:1904.02194 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.02194

    1904 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Ballard, D

    M. Ballard, D. Deliu, D. Favero, M. U. Isik and L. Katzarkov,On the derived categories of degree d hypersurface fibrations, Math. Ann.371(2018) no.1-2, 337-370 doi:10.1007/s00208-017-1613-4

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Katzarkov and L

    L. Katzarkov and L. Soriani,Homological mirror symmetry, coisotropic branes and P=W, Eur. J. Math.4(2018) no.3, 1141-1160 doi:10.1007/s40879-018-0273-6

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    Ballard, D

    M. Ballard, D. Favero and L. Katzarkov,Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients and derived categories, J. Reine Angew. Math.2019(2019) no.746, 235-303 doi:10.1515/crelle-2015-0096

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    Katzarkov, E

    L. Katzarkov, E. Lupercio, L. Meersseman and A. Verjovsky,Non-commutative Toric Varieties, [arXiv:1308.2774 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1308.2774

    doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dimitrov, F

    G. Dimitrov, F. Haiden, L. Katzarkov and M. Kontsevich,Dynamical systems and categories, doi:10.1090/conm/621 [arXiv:1307.8418 [math.CT]]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Rebhan, L

    A. Rebhan, L. Katzarkov, J. Knapp, R. Rashkov and E. Scheidegger,Strings, gauge fields, and the geometry behind: The legacy of Maximilian Kreuzer, World Scientific, 2013, ISBN 978-981-4412-54-4 doi:10.1142/8561

    2013 doi

  50. [58]

    R. S. Garavuso, L. Katzarkov, M. Kreuzer and A. Noll,Super Landau-Ginzburg mirrors and algebraic cycles, JHEP03(2011), 017 [erratum: JHEP08(2011), 063] doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)063 [arXiv:1101.1368 [hep-th]]. – 38 –

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kapustin, L

    A. Kapustin, L. Katzarkov, D. Orlov and M. Yotov,Homological Mirror Symmetry for manifolds of general type, Open Math.7(2009) no.4, 571-605 doi:10.2478/s11533-009-0056-x [arXiv:1004.0129 [math.AG]]

    2009 arXiv

  52. [60]

    H. L. Chang, J. Li, W. P. Li and C. C. M. Liu,An effective theory of GW and FJR W invariants of quintics Calabi–Yau manifolds, J. Diff. Geom.120(2022) no.2, 251-306 doi:10.4310/jdg/1645207466

    2022

  53. [61]

    Li and C

    J. Li and C. C. M. Liu,Counting curves in quintic Calabi–Yau threefolds and Landau–Ginzburg models, Surveys Diff. Geom.24(2019) no.1, 173-203 doi:10.4310/sdg.2019.v24.n1.a5

    2019 doi

  54. [62]

    H. L. Chang, J. Li, W. P. Li and C. C. M. Liu,An effective theory of GW and FJR W invariants of quintics Calabi-Yau manifolds, [arXiv:1603.06184 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.06184

    doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    Banerjee, P

    S. Banerjee, P. Longhi and M. Romo,ModellingA-branes with foliations, [arXiv:2309.07748 [hep-th]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.07748

    doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    T. J. Lee, B. H. Lian and M. Romo,Non-commutative resolutions as mirrors of singular Calabi–Yau varieties, [arXiv:2307.02038 [hep-th]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.02038

    doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    Guo and M

    J. Guo and M. Romo,Hybrid models for homological projective duals and noncommutative resolutions, Lett. Math. Phys.112(2022) no.6, 117 doi:10.1007/s11005-022-01605-3 [arXiv:2111.00025 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Jockers, V

    H. Jockers, V. Kumar, J. M. Lapan, D. R. Morrison and M. Romo,Two-Sphere Partition Functions and Gromov-Witten Invariants, Commun. Math. Phys.325(2014), 1139-1170 doi:10.1007/s00220-013-1874-z [arXiv:1208.6244 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Hodge theoretic aspects of mirror symmetry

    Katzarkov, Ludmil, Maxim Kontsevich and Tony Pantev. “Hodge theoretic aspects of mirror symmetry.” arXiv: Algebraic Geometry (2008): n. pag

    2008

  60. [68]

    Dragos Oprea, Framed sheaves over treefolds and symmetric obstruction theories. Doc. Math. 18 (2013), pp. 323–342 DOI 10.4171/DM/399

    2013 doi

  61. [69]

    Shifted symplectic structures

    Pantev, Tony; To¨ en, Bertrand; Vaqui´ e, Michel; Vezzosi, Gabriele. Shifted symplectic structures. Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES, Volume 117 (2013), pp. 271-328. doi : 10.1007/s10240-013-0054-1. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1007/s10240-013-0054-1/

    2013 doi

  62. [70]

    C. Brav, V. Bussi, D. Dupont, D. Joyce and B. Szendroi,Symmetries and stabilization for sheaves of vanishing cycles, [arXiv:1211.3259 [math.AG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1211.3259

    doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    C. Brav, V. Bussi and D. Joyce,A Darboux theorem for derived schemes with shifted symplectic structure, J. Am. Math. Soc.32(2018) no.2, 399-443 doi:10.1090/jams/910 [arXiv:1305.6302 [math.AG]]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Ben-Bassat, C

    O. Ben-Bassat, C. Brav, V. Bussi and D. Joyce,A ‘Darboux theorem’ for shifted symplectic structures on derived Artin stacks, with applications, Geom. Topol.19(2015) no.3, 1287-1359 doi:10.2140/gt.2015.19.1287 [arXiv:1312.0090 [math.AG]]

    2015 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Brav and T

    C. Brav and T. Dyckerhoff,Relative Calabi–Yau structures II: shifted Lagrangians in the moduli of objects, Selecta Math.27(2021) no.4, 63 doi:10.1007/s00029-021-00642-5 [arXiv:1812.11913 [math.AG]]. – 39 –

    2021 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Qin,Coisotropic branes on tori and Homological mirror symmetry, arXiv:2207.10647 [math.SG], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.10647

    Y. Qin,Coisotropic branes on tori and Homological mirror symmetry, arXiv:2207.10647 [math.SG], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.10647

    doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    Qin,Shifted symplectic structure on Poisson Lie algebroid and generalized complex geometry, arXiv:2407.15598 [math.SG], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.15598

    Y. Qin,Shifted symplectic structure on Poisson Lie algebroid and generalized complex geometry, arXiv:2407.15598 [math.SG], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.15598

    doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    Aganagic, I

    M. Aganagic, I. Danilenko, Y. Li, V. Shende and P. Zhou,Quiver Hecke algebras from Floer homology in Couloumb branches, [arXiv:2406.04258 [math.SG]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.04258

    doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    Gukov, P

    S. Gukov, P. Koroteev, S. Nawata, D. Pei and I. Saberi,Branes and DAHA Representations, Springer, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-28153-2, 978-3-031-28154-9 doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28154-9 [arXiv:2206.03565 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Losev, N

    A. Losev, N. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili,On four dimensional mirror symmetry, Fortsch. Phys.48(2000), 163-166

    2000

  71. [79]

    Losev and V

    A. Losev and V. Lysov,Tropical Mirror, SIGMA20(2024), 072 doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2024.072 [arXiv:2204.06896 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Losev and V

    A. Losev and V. Lysov,Tropical Mirror Symmetry: Correlation functions, [arXiv:2301.01687 [hep-th]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.01687 Focus to learn more

    doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    Losev and V

    A. Losev and V. Lysov,Tropical mirror for toric surfaces, [arXiv:2305.00423 [hep-th]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.00423

    doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    Frenkel and A

    E. Frenkel and A. Losev,Mirror symmetry in two steps: A-I-B, Commun. Math. Phys.269 (2006), 39-86 doi:10.1007/s00220-006-0114-1 [arXiv:hep-th/0505131 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Donagi, B

    R. Donagi, B. A. Ovrut, T. Pantev and D. Waldram,Standard model bundles on nonsimply connected Calabi-Yau threefolds, JHEP08(2001), 053 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/08/053 [arXiv:hep-th/0008008 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Donagi, B

    R. Donagi, B. A. Ovrut, T. Pantev and D. Waldram,Standard model bundles, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.5(2002), 563-615 doi:10.4310/ATMP.2001.v5.n3.a5 [arXiv:math/0008010 [math.AG]]

    2002 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Donagi, B

    R. Donagi, B. A. Ovrut, T. Pantev and D. Waldram,Nonperturbative vacua in heterotic M theory, Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000), 1049-1056 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/5/314

    2000 doi

  78. [86]

    Donagi, B

    R. Donagi, B. A. Ovrut, T. Pantev and D. Waldram,Standard models from heterotic M theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.5(2002), 93-137 doi:10.4310/ATMP.2001.v5.n1.a4 [arXiv:hep-th/9912208 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Cicoli, I

    M. Cicoli, I. G. Etxebarria, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, P. Shukla and R. Valandro,The Standard Model quiver in de Sitter string compactifications, JHEP08(2021), 109 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)109 [arXiv:2106.11964 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [89]

    Pandharipande.Cohomological Field Theory Calculations, Proc

    R. Pandharipande.Cohomological Field Theory Calculations, Proc. Int. Cong. of Math. – 2018 Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 1 (869–898), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.02528

    2018 doi arXiv

  81. [90]

    Black Holes, q-Deformed 2d Yang-Mills, and Non-perturbative Topological Strings

    Aganagic, Mina, Hirosi Ooguri, Natalia Saulina and Cumrun Vafa. “Black Holes, q-Deformed 2d Yang-Mills, and Non-perturbative Topological Strings.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2004): n. pag., https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0411280

    2004 doi arXiv

  82. [91]

    G. W. Moore, and Y. Tachikawa. (2011). On 2d TQFTs whose values are holomorphic – 40 – symplectic varieties. 10.1090/pspum/085/1379, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0609042

    2011 doi arXiv

  83. [92]

    Crooks, M

    P. Crooks, M. Mayrand. The Moore-Tachikawa conjecture via shifted symplectic geometry. arXiv:2409.03532 [math.SG], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.03532

    doi arXiv

  84. [93]

    G. W. Moore, and G. B. Segal.D-branes and K-theory in 2D topological field theory.arXiv: High Energy Physics - Theory (2006): n. pag

    2006

  85. [94]

    Pasquarella

    V. Pasquarella. Moore-Tachikawa Varieties: Beyond Duality. e-Print: 2310.01489 [hep-th]. DOI: 10.22128/jhap.2023.741.1061. Published in: JHAP 3 (2023) 4, 39-56

    2023

  86. [95]

    C. Teleman. The structure of 2D semi-simple field theories. Invent. math. 188, 525–588 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-011-0352-5

    2012 doi

  87. [96]

    Three dimensional canonical singularity and five dimensional NN= 1 SCFT

    Xie, Dan and Shing-Tung Yau. “Three dimensional canonical singularity and five dimensional NN= 1 SCFT.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (2017): 1-34. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.00799

    2017 doi arXiv

  88. [97]

    The rˆ ole of Coulomb branches in 2D gauge theory

    Teleman, Constantin. “The rˆ ole of Coulomb branches in 2D gauge theory.” Journal of the European Mathematical Society (2018): n. pag., https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.10124

    2018 doi

  89. [98]

    Braverman, M

    A. Braverman, M. Finkelberg, and H. Nakajima,Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of3-dimensionalN“4gauge theories, II, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.22 (2018), 1071-1147 doi:10.4310/ATMP.2018.v22.n5.a1 [arXiv:1601.03586 [math.RT]]

    2018 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Mirror symmetry, Tyurin degenerations and fibrations on Calabi-Yau manifolds

    Doran, Charles F., Andrew Harder and Alan Thompson. “Mirror symmetry, Tyurin degenerations and fibrations on Calabi-Yau manifolds.” arXiv: Algebraic Geometry (2016): n. pag., https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.08110

    2016 doi arXiv

  91. [100]

    Calabi-Yau structures, spherical functors, and shifted symplectic structures

    Katzarkov, Ludmil, Pranav S. Pandit and Theodore C Spaide. “Calabi-Yau structures, spherical functors, and shifted symplectic structures.” Advances in Mathematics (2017): n. pag., https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.07789

    2017 doi arXiv

  92. [101]

    Givental, A. (2000). On the WDVV equation in quantum K -theory. The Michigan Mathematical Journal, 48(1), 295–304. doi:10.1307/mmj/1030132720

    2000

  93. [102]

    Gauge theory and mirror symmetry

    Teleman, Constantin. “Gauge theory and mirror symmetry.” arXiv: Mathematical Physics (2014): n. pag., https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.6305

    2014 doi arXiv

  94. [103]

    Kapustin, L

    A. Kapustin, L. Rozansky and N. Saulina,Three-dimensional topological field theory and symplectic algebraic geometry I, Nucl. Phys. B816(2009), 295-355 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.01.027 [arXiv:0810.5415 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Sheridan

    N. Sheridan. On the Homological Mirror Symmetry Conjecture for the Pair of Pants, J. Diff. Geom.89(2011) 271-367, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1012.3238

    2011 doi arXiv

  96. [105]

    Safronov

    P. Safronov. Shifted Geometric Quantisation, 2020, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.05730

    2020 doi arXiv

  97. [106]

    Pomerleano, C

    D. Pomerleano, C. Teleman. Quantization commutes with reduction again: the quantum GIT conjecture I. arXiv:2405.20301 [math.SG], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.20301

    doi arXiv

  98. [107]

    Fukaya Categories and Picard-Lefschetz Theory

    Seidel, Paul. “Fukaya Categories and Picard-Lefschetz Theory.” (2008), DOI 10.4171/063

    2008 doi

  99. [108]

    Webster,Koszul duality between Higgs and Coulomb categoriesO, [arXiv:1611.06541 [math.RT]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.06541

    B. Webster,Koszul duality between Higgs and Coulomb categoriesO, [arXiv:1611.06541 [math.RT]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.06541. – 41 –

    doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.