Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Anisotropic resonance energy transfer with strained phosphorene

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Resonance energy transfer between emitters near phosphorene depends sharply on the crystal direction of their separation and is strongly modulated by uniaxial strain, with the largest effects along the zigzag direction.

desk verdict Solid z-dipole RET calculation with strained phosphorene; the directionality and strain claims hold for that geometry, but the abstract overstates generality. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07121 v1 pith:L4ZRE5CJ submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.opticsquant-ph

J. Oliveira-Cony , C. Farina , P. P. Abrantes , Tarik P. Cysne This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords resonanceenergytransferphosphoreneuniaxialstrainanisotropic2DmaterialsdyadicGreenfunctionFresnelreflectioncoefficientszigzag-armchairanisotropyquantumemitters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that the rate of resonance energy transfer between two quantum emitters placed near a phosphorene sheet on a silicon-carbide substrate depends strongly on which crystalline direction the emitters are separated along: large changes occur along the zigzag direction while the armchair direction barely matters. It further predicts that uniaxial strain applied to phosphorene can modulate this transfer rate dramatically, with a sharp change near the strain value (approximately 11.8% at Fermi energy 0.7 eV) where phosphorene crosses from metallic to insulating. The authors argue via a toy model that such directional sensitivity is a generic feature of any anisotropic two-dimensional material, not a peculiarity of phosphorene. This matters because strain is an experimentally accessible knob for controlling energy transport in nanophotonic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the scattered dyadic Green function $G_{zz}^{(S)}$ evaluated with both emitters' transition dipoles along the $z$-axis, which reduces the normalized RET rate to $|1 + G_{zz}^{(S)}/G_{zz}^{(0)}|^2$. The medium enters through the $p$-polarized Fresnel reflection coefficient $r_{p,p}$ of the phosphorene/SiC interface, built from the anisotropic conductivity tensor of strained phosphorene (with in-plane components $\sigma_{xx}$ and $\sigma_{yy}$) and SiC's Drude-Lorentz permittivity. The conductivity tensor, computed via linear response from a two-band tight-binding model with strain included via Harrison's prescription, is what encodes both the armchair/zigzag anisotropy and the strain-induced metal-insulator transition.

What would settle it

Measure the normalized RET rate of two emitters with out-of-plane transition dipoles at fixed height $z=0.01\lambda$ above a phosphorene/SiC interface, comparing separations along the armchair and zigzag axes at $\lambda=10\ \mu$m; the paper's Fig. 4 predicts a large contrast, so observing no directional difference would falsify the central claim. Likewise, a strain sweep across 11.8% should show a sharp change in the rate, and its absence would rule out the strain-modulation mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors compute the normalized RET rate, defined as the squared ratio of the scattered-plus-free dyadic Green function to its free-space value, for two z-oriented electric dipole emitters above a phosphorene/SiC interface. Using a low-energy tight-binding model with Harrison's strain prescription for the optical conductivity, they find that the rate is nearly independent of separation when the emitters are placed along the armchair (x) axis, but oscillates and changes by orders of magnitude when they are separated along the zigzag (y) axis. Applying uniaxial strain along the zigzag direction produces a strong, non-monotonic modulation of the rate, with a discontinuous change at the metallic-to-insulating transition. The same qualitative anisotropy is reproduced in a toy model with isotropic conductivity replaced by an anisotropic diagonal tensor, leading to the conclusion that directional RET control is a general property of anisotropic media.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes both emitters' transition dipole moments point perpendicular to the phosphorene plane, keeping only the $zz$ component of the Green function and $p$-polarized reflection; if real emitters have in-plane dipole components, the demonstrated armchair/zigzag contrast could weaken, reverse, or shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Placing emitter pairs along the zigzag axis of phosphorene gives a sensitive, strain-tunable control of energy transfer efficiency in the near field.
  • Near the strain-driven metal-insulator transition (about 11.8% for $E_F=0.7$ eV), small changes in strain can switch the RET rate abruptly, offering a switching mechanism.
  • The anisotropy effect persists for generic anisotropic 2D materials, so similar directional control should be observable in other systems with anisotropic optical conductivity.
  • The normalized RET rate oscillates with separation and with height above the interface, so both position and crystal orientation must be fixed in any device design.
  • The formalism generalizes straightforwardly to other dipole orientations, extending the prediction beyond the $z$-oriented case analyzed here.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The $z$-oriented dipole assumption likely understates the effect for in-plane dipoles, which also couple to $s$-polarized and mixed ($\sigma_{LT}$) reflection channels; the directional contrast may reverse or shift for such emitters.
  • Because the toy model ties the anisotropy to the ratio $F$ of in-plane conductivities, a direct experimental test could use materials with continuously tunable $F$, such as twisted heterostructures or strain-gradient samples.
  • The metal-insulator transition point depends on Fermi energy, so the strain value at which the RET jump occurs can be tuned by gating, suggesting a combined strain-plus-voltage control scheme.
  • The paper's oscillation pattern hints that the RET rate could be used as a spectroscopic probe of the phosphorene conductivity tensor, with the amplitude of the zigzag/armchair contrast encoding the degree of anisotropy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the resonance energy transfer (RET) rate between two quantum emitters near a phosphorene/SiC interface, combining a dyadic Green function formalism with a low-energy tight-binding model for strained phosphorene. The normalized RET rate is computed for emitters whose transition dipole moments are oriented perpendicular to the phosphorene plane, and the authors find that the rate depends strongly on whether the emitters are separated along the armchair or zigzag direction, with the zigzag direction showing much larger sensitivity to both separation distance and applied uniaxial strain. A toy model with an anisotropic conductivity tensor is used to argue that this direction dependence is a generic feature of anisotropic two-dimensional media. All numerical results are presented for a single Fermi energy (EF = 0.7 eV) and fixed scattering rates (η1 = η2 = 25 meV).

Significance. The paper's strength is that it uses a standard and complete formalism, and it makes specific, falsifiable predictions: the normalized RET rate near phosphorene should exhibit a pronounced zigzag/armchair asymmetry and a strong, non-monotonic strain dependence, including a sharp change near the metal-insulator transition. The toy model elegantly shows that the effect does not rely on the detailed electronic structure of phosphorene but on the general presence of anisotropic conductivity. However, the significance is tempered by the fact that all numerical results assume vertically oriented dipoles, a special geometry that is not stated in the abstract or conclusions. If the directional contrast does not survive for more general emitter orientations, the headline claim would be overgeneralized. The paper is nonetheless a useful theoretical contribution to strain-controlled energy transfer in anisotropic two-dimensional materials.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. II, Eq. (11)] The direction-dependent RET claim is computed only for the case where both transition dipole moments are along the z-axis, which reduces the Green function to its zz component and retains only the p-polarized reflection coefficient. This is a clean setup, but the abstract and conclusions present the direction dependence and strain modulation as general properties, without the vertical-dipole qualification. For dipoles with in-plane or random orientations, the free-space Green function itself depends on the in-plane separation direction through the dipole orientation factor, and the normalized rate involves additional Green function components, including s-polarized and cross-polarized (σ_LT) contributions in the Fresnel coefficients. The paper does not demonstrate that the zigzag/armchair contrast survives such deviations. This is a load-bearing concern because the headline claim is overgeneralized. The authors should either extend the calculation to other dipole orientations, provide an orientation-averaged result, or explicitly qualify the abstract and conclusions to state that the demonstrated anisotropy applies to vertically oriented dipoles.
  2. [Sec. IIIB, Fig. 5] All strain-dependent results are shown for a single Fermi energy (EF = 0.7 eV) and fixed scattering rates (η1 = η2 = 25 meV). The sharp modification of the RET rate near εy = 11.8% is tied to a metal-insulator transition whose position depends on EF. Without a sensitivity analysis over EF and the scattering rates, the quantitative range and robustness of the strain-modulation claim are not established. Adding such an analysis, or at least a discussion of how the critical strain shifts with EF, would strengthen the paper substantially.
  3. [Appendix A] The conductivity model is central to the results, but the paper only references Ref. [58] and shows plots of the conductivity without providing the closed-form expressions for σ_xx(ω, εµ) and σ_yy(ω, εµ), nor the tight-binding parameters used. This makes independent reproduction difficult. I recommend giving the explicit conductivity formulas or providing a code/data repository, especially since the quantitative RET rates and the location of the strain-driven transition depend on these inputs.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 and Sec. IIIB] In the caption of Fig. 1, strain εx is described as being applied along the x-direction (armchair), but the main text and subsequent figures focus on strain εy along the y-direction (zigzag). Please clarify the convention in both the figure and the text.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (13)] The toy model uses σ_xx = σ0(0.33 + i1.63) with σ0 = e²/ℏ, but the choice of these numerical values is not explained. Please state the frequency or the physical motivation for this choice, or clarify that it is an arbitrary illustrative value.
  3. [Sec. IIIB] The text refers to a 'discontinuous change in the RET rate' at the metal-insulator transition (εy = 11.8%). The plotted curves may show a sharp but continuous variation; the term 'discontinuous' should be used only if the model actually produces a discontinuity, otherwise rephrase to 'sharp change'.
  4. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B4)-(B6)] The definitions of kz1 and kz2 are given in the text but could be stated explicitly near the equations for clarity, especially because the paper deals with a vacuum/SiC interface with different permittivities.
  5. [Sec. II, after Eq. (10)] The statement that generalization to other dipole orientations is 'straightforward and follows analogously' is an unsubstantiated handwave. Given the importance of the dipole orientation for the central claim, it would be more honest to say that such a generalization involves additional Green function components and to briefly indicate what terms would appear.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the RET rates and their strain dependence are genuine outputs of a Green-function calculation fed by an independently computed anisotropic conductivity tensor; self-citations supply real evidence and do not make the derivation circular.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: tight-binding conductivity of strained phosphorene (Appendix A, following the approach reviewed in Ref. [58], with the Hamiltonian and strain prescription from external Refs. [67, 70, 71]) yields the anisotropic Fresnel coefficients (Appendix B), which enter the scattered Green function (Eq. (10)), giving the normalized RET rate (Eq. (11)). The headline directional anisotropy is computed, not assumed: the free-space Green function in Eq. (9) is isotropic (it depends only on r = |r_B - r_A|), so the zigzag/armchair contrast originates from the k-parallel-direction dependence of sigma_L in r_p,p, with the specific magnitudes being genuine outputs of the integrals. The strain modulation, oscillations, and the discontinuity at the metal-insulator transition are likewise computed outputs rather than fitted values; no parameter is fitted to the RET data. The self-citations to Ref. [58] for the conductivity approach, the scattering scales eta1 = eta2 = 25 meV, and the 11.8% transition strain are load-bearing inputs, but that prior work is an independent, peer-reviewed computation grounded in external tight-binding and strain models whose stated assumptions do not include the RET rate, so under the stated rules it is real evidence and does not raise the circularity score. The Sec. IV toy model is explicitly illustrative ('This simple toy model allows us to isolate the impacts of the interface anisotropy on RET') and its conclusion that anisotropic media produce direction-dependent RET follows from the structure of the Fresnel coefficients; the paper does not present the toy model as a first-principles prediction. The restriction to z-oriented dipoles (Sec. II) narrows the scope of the directional claim, but that is a correctness or generality caveat, not a circularity. Overall, the derivation is self-contained given the conductivity input, with no step reducing by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the standard planar Green function formalism, the tight-binding conductivity model from prior work, and a specific emitter orientation (z-dipoles). No target quantity is fitted in this paper; the free parameters are either inherited from the prior model (EF, eta, tight-binding hoppings) or chosen for illustration (toy-model sigma and F).

free parameters (5)
  • Fermi energy E_F = 0.7 eV
    Chosen and held fixed in all main plots; controls the intraband (Drude) contribution and the strain value of the metal-insulator transition (11.8%).
  • Electronic scattering rates eta_1, eta_2 = 25 meV
    Taken from Ref. [58]; broaden the conductivity resonances and affect the magnitude of the RET modulation.
  • Toy model conductivity sigma_xx = sigma_0 (0.33 + i 1.63)
    Arbitrary complex conductivity chosen to illustrate the generic anisotropic effect; not derived from a microscopic model.
  • Toy model anisotropy parameter F = varied (e.g., F = 0.1, 1, 10)
    Ad hoc knob that sets sigma_yy = F sigma_xx; controls which direction shows the larger RET variation.
  • Tight-binding hopping parameters = from Ref. [67]
    Underpin the conductivity tensor via linear response; taken from prior DFT-fitted model and not reproduced in this paper.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math The electromagnetic field obeys Maxwell's equations with standard Fresnel boundary conditions at a planar interface.
    Used throughout Sec. II and Appendix B to obtain the reflection coefficients and Green function.
  • domain assumption The QEs are electric dipoles in the weak-coupling regime, so the RET rate is proportional to |d_B . G . d_A|^2.
    Invoked in Sec. II in the derivation of the normalized RET rate Eq. (5).
  • domain assumption Both transition dipole moments are oriented along the z-axis.
    Stated in Sec. II; simplifies the scattered Green function to the zz component and restricts the claim to this orientation.
  • domain assumption Phosphorene can be described as a zero-thickness sheet with local optical conductivities sigma_xx and sigma_yy.
    Used in Eq. (12) and Appendix B; ignores nonlocal and finite-thickness effects.
  • domain assumption Uniaxial strain modifies the tight-binding hoppings according to Harrison's prescription.
    Invoked in Appendix A following Refs. [70,71]; the resulting conductivity changes drive the strain modulation result.
  • domain assumption The SiC substrate is semi-infinite with a Drude-Lorentz permittivity.
    Used in Appendix B with parameters from Refs. [86,87].
  • ad hoc to paper The toy model conductivity tensor with sigma_yy = F sigma_xx captures the essential physics of anisotropic 2D media.
    Introduced in Sec. IV to isolate the effect of anisotropy; the specific sigma_xx value is chosen, not derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anisotropic resonance energy transfer with strained phosphorene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L4ZRE5CJ

@misc{pith2026250207121,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anisotropic resonance energy transfer with strained phosphorene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L4ZRE5CJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07121}
}
read the original abstract

We analyze the resonance energy transfer (RET) rate between quantum emitters (QEs) near a phosphorene/SiC interface under the effects of uniaxial strain. Using a low-energy tight-binding model, we describe the electronic structure of strained phosphorene in an experimentally feasible situation. Due to the anisotropic electronic structure of phosphorene, we demonstrate that the RET rate drastically depends on the direction in which the QEs are separated relative to the phosphorene lattice. More specifically, we obtain a large variation in the RET rate when the QEs are separated along the zigzag direction, in contrast to a rather small variation when separated along the armchair direction of phosphorene's crystalline structure. Furthermore, our results reveal that the RET rate can be highly modulated by uniaxial strain in phosphorene when considering emitters placed along the zigzag direction. Finally, by means of a simple toy model, we also show that this anisotropy in the RET rate is a general characteristic produced by anisotropic 2D materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07121 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two QEs separated by a distance r and both at a distance z from a phosphorene/SiC interface, in which uniax￾ial strain may be applied. In this sketch, strain ϵx is applied along the x−direction (armchair). To calculate the RET rate, we use the dyadic Green function formalism by solving the Helmholtz equation [(∇r × ∇r×) − k 2 (r, ω)]G(r, r ′ ; ω) = δ(r − r ′ )1 (4) for the planar geometry described above [7, 80], wh… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Normalized RET rate as a function of z for different distances between the QEs placed along the x−axis [panels (a) and (b)] and y−axis [panels (c) and (d)]. We set λ = 1.5 µm in the first row and λ = 10 µm in the second row. [45, 81–83]. (iii) While the normalized RET rate barely changes for QEs separated along the x−axis (armchair), it is drastically changed when the separation is along the y−axis (zigzag). In [PI… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Normalized RET rate as a function of the distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Normalized RET rate as a function of the distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized RET rate as a function of the distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real and imaginary parts of phosphorene’s opti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Real and imaginary parts of phosphorene’s optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spontaneous emission and Purcell effect: some aspects

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A pedagogical review of spontaneous emission and the Purcell effect, with standard worked examples and summaries of recent studies on engineered environments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [58]

    P. P. Abrantes, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, F. S. S. Rosa, C. Farina, F. A. Pinheiro, and T. P. Cysne, Control- ling electric and magnetic Purcell effects in phosphorene via strain engineering, Physical Review B108, 155427 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Morgner, B

    J. Morgner, B. Tu, C. König, T. Sailer, F. Heiße, H. Bekker, B. Sikora, C. Lyu, V. Yerokhin, Z. Harman, et al., Stringent test of QED with hydrogen-like tin, Na- ture 622, 53 (2023)

    2023

  3. [2]

    Aguillard, T

    D. Aguillard, T. Albahri, D. Allspach, A. Anisenkov, K. Badgley, S. Baeßler, I. Bailey, L. Bailey, V. Baranov, E. Barlas-Yucel,et al., Detailed report on the measure- ment of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm, Physical Review D110, 032009 (2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    Loetzsch, H

    R. Loetzsch, H. Beyer, L. Duval, U. Spillmann, D. Ba- naś, P. Dergham, F. Kröger, J. Glorius, R. Grisenti, M. Guerra, et al., Testing quantum electrodynamics in extreme fields using helium-like uranium, Nature 625, 673 (2024)

    2024

  5. [4]

    Milonni, The Quantum Vacuum (Academic Press, 2013)

    P. Milonni, The Quantum Vacuum (Academic Press, 2013)

    2013

  6. [5]

    Milton, Casimir Effect (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2001)

    K. Milton, Casimir Effect (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2001)

    2001

  7. [6]

    Dalvit, P

    D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, and F. da Rosa, Casimir Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011)

    2011

  8. [7]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of nano-optics (Cambridge university press, 2012)

    2012

Show all 87 references
  1. [8]

    Dodonov, Fifty years of the dynamical Casimir effect, Physics 2, 67 (2020)

    V. Dodonov, Fifty years of the dynamical Casimir effect, Physics 2, 67 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    D. L. Andrews and B. S. Sherborne, Resonant excitation transfer: A quantum electrodynamical study, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics86, 4011 (1987)

    1987

  3. [10]

    Jones and D

    G. Jones and D. Bradshaw, Resonance energy transfer: From fundamental theory to recent applications, Fron- tiers in Physics7, 100 (2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    D. L. Andrews and R. H. Lipson, Molecular Photophysics and Spectroscopy (IOP Pub- lishing, 2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Förster, Energy migration and fluorescence, Journal of Biomedical Optics17, 011002 (2012), originally pub- lished in 1946

    T. Förster, Energy migration and fluorescence, Journal of Biomedical Optics17, 011002 (2012), originally pub- lished in 1946

    2012

  6. [13]

    Chen, S.-H

    N.-T. Chen, S.-H. Cheng, C.-P. Liu, J. S. Souris, C.- T. Chen, C.-Y. Mou, and L.-W. Lo, Recent advances in nanoparticle-based Förster resonance energy transfer for biosensing, molecular imaging and drug release profiling, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, 16598 (2012)

    2012

  7. [14]

    Geißler, S

    D. Geißler, S. Stufler, H.-G. Löhmannsröben, and N. Hildebrandt, Six-color time-resolved Förster res- onance energy transfer for ultrasensitive multiplexed biosensing, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 1102 (2013)

    2013

  8. [15]

    S. A. Hussain, D. Dey, S. Chakraborty, J. Saha, A. Datta Roy, S. Chakraborty, P. Debnath, and D.Bhattacharjee,Fluorescenceresonanceenergytransfer (FRET) sensor, Journal of Spectroscopy and Dynamics (2014)

    2014

  9. [16]

    L. Yang, C. Cui, L. Wang, J. Lei, and J. Zhang, Dual- shell fluorescent nanoparticles for self-monitoring of pH- responsive molecule-releasing in a visualized way, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces8, 19084 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    A. K. Verma, A. Noumani, A. K. Yadav, and P. R. Solanki, FRET based biosensor: Principle applications recent advances and challenges, Diagnostics (Basel)13, 7 1375 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    T. Ha, J. Fei, S. Schmid, N. K. Lee, R. L. Gonza- lez Jr, S. Paul, and S. Yeou, Fluorescence resonance en- ergy transfer at the single-molecule level, Nature Reviews Methods Primers4, 21 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    H. Sahoo, Förster resonance energy transfer – a spec- troscopic nanoruler: Principle and applications, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews 12, 20 (2011)

    2011

  13. [20]

    K. V. Baryshnikova, M. I. Petrov, and T. A. Vartanyan, Plasmon nanoruler for monitoring of transient interac- tions, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Let- ters 9, 711 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Fang, W. Huang, Q. Li, H. Jiang, C. Wang, and H. Liu, Plasmon resonance energy transfer nanoruler for pinpointing molecular distance and interaction on the living cell membrane, Nano Letters23, 7750 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    A. J. P. Teunissen, C. Pérez-Medina, A. Meijerink, and W. J. M. Mulder, Investigating supramolecular systems using Förster resonance energy transfer, Chemical Soci- ety Reviews47, 7027 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    M. J. Mayoral, D. Serrano-Molina, J. Camacho-García, E. Magdalena-Estirado, M. Blanco-Lomas, E. Fadaei, and D. González-Rodríguez, Understanding complex supramolecular landscapes: non-covalent macrocycliza- tionequilibriaexaminedbyfluorescenceresonanceenergy transfer, Chemical...

    2018

  17. [24]

    Rajdev and S

    P. Rajdev and S. Ghosh, Fluorescence resonance energy transfer(FRET):Apowerfultoolforprobingamphiphilic polymer aggregates and supramolecular polymers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B123, 327 (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    J. L. Banal, B. Zhang, D. J. Jones, K. P. Ghiggino, and W. W. H. Wong, Emissive molecular aggregates and en- ergy migration in luminescent solar concentrators, Ac- counts of Chemical Research50, 49 (2017)

    2017

  19. [26]

    Tummeltshammer, M

    C. Tummeltshammer, M. Portnoi, S. A. Mitchell, A.-T. Lee, A.J.Kenyon, A.B.Tabor,andI.Papakonstantinou, On the ability of Förster resonance energy transfer to enhance luminescent solar concentrator efficiency, Nano Energy 32, 263 (2017)

    2017

  20. [27]

    Zhang, G

    B. Zhang, G. Lyu, E. A. Kelly, and R. C. Evans, Förster resonance energy transfer in luminescent solar concentra- tors, Advanced Science9, 2201160 (2022)

    2022

  21. [28]

    G. P. Gorbenko, V. Trusova, and J. G. Molotkovsky, Förster resonance energy transfer study of cytochrome c—lipid interactions, Journal of Fluorescence 28, 79 (2017)

    2017

  22. [29]

    Bartnik, A

    K. Bartnik, A. Barth, M. Pilo-Pais, A. H. Crevenna, T. Liedl, and D. C. Lamb, A DNA origami platform for single-pair Förster resonance energy transfer investiga- tion of DNA–DNA interactions and ligation, Journal of the American Chemical Society142, 815 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    X. Fan, S. Wang, X. Yang, C. Zhong, G. Chen, C. Yu, Y. Chen, T. Wu, H. Kuo, Y. Lin, and Z. Chen, Bright- ened bicomponent perovskite nanocomposite based on Förster resonance energy transfer for micro-LED dis- plays, Advanced Materials35, 2300834 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    Y. Li, M. Qian, Y. Liu, and X. Qiu, Approach: Sensitive detection of exosomal biomarkers by aptamer-mediated proximity ligation assay and time-resolved Förster reso- nance energy transfer, Biosensors14, 233 (2024)

    2024

  25. [32]

    Yablonovitch, Photonic crystals, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 173 (1994)

    E. Yablonovitch, Photonic crystals, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 173 (1994)

    1994

  26. [33]

    W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, F. S. S. Rosa, F. A. Pinheiro, and C. Farina, Molding the flow of light with a magnetic field: plasmonic cloaking and directional scattering, JOSA A 31, 1969 (2014)

    2014

  27. [34]

    W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, B. Amorim, G. Bastos, F. A. Pin- heiro, F. S. S. Rosa, N. M. R. Peres, and C. Farina, Ac- tive magneto-optical control of spontaneous emission in graphene, Physical Review B92, 205415 (2015)

    2015

  28. [35]

    de Melo e Souza, W

    R. de Melo e Souza, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, F. S. S. Rosa, and C. Farina, Influence of a surface in the nonretarded interaction between two atoms, Physical Review A91, 052708 (2015)

    2015

  29. [36]

    Szilard, W

    D. Szilard, W. Kort-Kamp, F. Rosa, F. Pinheiro, and C. Farina, Hysteresis in the spontaneous emission in- duced by VO2 phase change, JOSA B36, C46 (2019)

    2019

  30. [37]

    N. D. Chinh, Strong enhancement and inhibition of the interatomic van der Waals interaction inside a cylindri- cal waveguide, The European Physical Journal D74, 1 (2020)

    2020

  31. [38]

    Casabone, C

    B. Casabone, C. Deshmukh, S. Liu, D. Serrano, A. Fer- rier, T. Hümmer, P. Goldner, D. Hunger, and H. de Ried- matten, Dynamic control of Purcell enhanced emission of erbium ions in nanoparticles, Nature Communications 12, 3570 (2021)

    2021

  32. [39]

    G. S. Agarwal, Control of the Purcell effect via unexcited atoms and exceptional points, Physical Review Research 6, L012050 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    W. L. Barnes, Fluorescence near interfaces: The role of photonic mode density, Journal of Modern Optics45, 661 (1998)

    1998

  34. [41]

    Barnes and P

    W. Barnes and P. Andrew, Quantum optics: Energy transfer under control, Nature400, 505 (1999)

    1999

  35. [42]

    P. P. Abrantes, D. Szilard, F. S. S. Rosa, and C. Fa- rina, Resonance energy transfer at percolation transition, Modern Physics Letters A35, 2040022 (2020)

    2020

  36. [43]

    P. P. Abrantes, G. Bastos, D. Szilard, C. Farina, and F. S. S. Rosa, Tuning resonance energy transfer with magneto-optical properties of graphene, Physical Review B 103, 174421 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    S. H. Nayem, B. Sikder, and S. Z. Uddin, Anisotropic energy transfer near multi-layer black phosphorus, 2D Materials 10, 045022 (2023)

    2023

  38. [45]

    Lezhennikova, K

    K. Lezhennikova, K. Rustomji, B. T. Kuhlmey, T. An- tonakakis, P. Jomin, S. Glybovski, C. M. de Sterke, J. Wenger, R. Abdeddaim, and S. Enoch, Experimen- tal evidence of Förster energy transfer enhancement in the near field through engineered metamaterial surface waves, Commun...

    2023

  39. [46]

    E. K. Beutler, J. P. Camden, and D. J. Masiello, Reso- nance energy transfer in the presence of a spherical cavity and dispersive substrate, Physical Review B110, 155435 (2024)

    2024

  40. [47]

    Reserbat-Plantey, I

    A. Reserbat-Plantey, I. Epstein, I. Torre, A. T. Costa, P. A. D. Gonçalves, N. A. Mortensen, M. Polini, J. C. W. Song, N. M. R. Peres, and F. H. L. Koppens, Quantum nanophotonics in two-dimensional materials, ACS Pho- tonics 8, 85 (2021)

    2021

  41. [48]

    Y. Meng, H. Zhong, Z. Xu, T. He, J. S. Kim, S. Han, S. Kim, S. Park, Y. Shen, M. Gong, Q. Xiao, and S.- H. Bae, Functionalizing nanophotonic structures with 2D van der Waals materials, Nanoscale Horizons 8, 1345 (2023)

    2023

  42. [49]

    A. A. Banishev, H. Wen, J. Xu, R. K. Kawakami, G. L. Klimchitskaya, V. M. Mostepanenko, and U. Mohideen, Measuring the Casimir force gradient from graphene on 8 a SiO2 substrate, Physical Review B87, 205433 (2013)

    2013

  43. [50]

    Cysne, W

    T. Cysne, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, D. Oliver, F. A. Pinheiro, F. S. S. Rosa, and C. Farina, Tuning the Casimir-Polder interaction via magneto-optical effects in graphene, Physical Review A90, 052511 (2014)

    2014

  44. [51]

    L. M. Woods, D. A. R. Dalvit, A. Tkatchenko, P.Rodriguez-Lopez, A.W.Rodriguez,andR.Podgornik, Materials perspective on Casimir and van der Waals in- teractions,ReviewsofModernPhysics 88,045003(2016)

    2016

  45. [52]

    Rodriguez-Lopez, W

    P. Rodriguez-Lopez, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, D. A. R. Dalvit, and L. M. Woods, Casimir force phase transi- tions in the graphene family, Nature Communications8, 14699 (2017)

    2017

  46. [53]

    Silvestre, T

    M. Silvestre, T. P. Cysne, D. Szilard, F. A. Pinheiro, and C. Farina, Tuning quantum reflection in graphene with an external magnetic field, Physical Review A100, 033605 (2019)

    2019

  47. [54]

    M. Liu, Y. Zhang, G. L. Klimchitskaya, V. M. Mostepa- nenko, and U. Mohideen, Demonstration of an unusual thermal effect in the Casimir force from graphene, Phys- ical Review Letters126, 206802 (2021)

    2021

  48. [55]

    P. P. Abrantes, T. P. Cysne, D. Szilard, F. S. S. Rosa, F. A. Pinheiro, and C. Farina, Probing topological phase transitions via quantum reflection in the graphene family materials, Physical Review B104, 075409 (2021)

    2021

  49. [56]

    Gaudreau, K

    L. Gaudreau, K. J. Tielrooij, G. E. D. K. Prawiroat- modjo, J. Osmond, F. J. G. de Abajo, and F. H. L. Kop- pens, Universal distance-scaling of nonradiative energy transfer to graphene, Nano Letters13, 2030 (2013)

    2013

  50. [57]

    A. Raja, A. Montoya-Castillo, J. Zultak, X.-X. Zhang, Z. Ye, C. Roquelet, D. A. Chenet, A. M. van der Zande, P. Huang, S. Jockusch, J. Hone, D. R. Reichman, L. E. Brus, and T. F. Heinz, Energy transfer from quantum dots to graphene and MoS2: The role of absorption and screenin...

    2016

  51. [59]

    Cavicchi, M

    L. Cavicchi, M. Peralta, Álvaro Moreno, M. Vergniory, P. Jarillo-Herrero, C. Felser, G. C. L. Rocca, F. H. L. Koppens, and M. Polini, Recognizing molecular chirality via twisted 2D materials (2024), arXiv:2409.05839 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    B. Zhao, B. Guizal, Z. M. Zhang, S. Fan, and M. Antezza, Near-field heat transfer between graphene/hBN multilay- ers, Physical Review B95, 245437 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    L. Ge, K. Gong, Y. Cang, Y. Luo, X. Shi, and Y. Wu, Magnetically tunable multiband near-field radiative heat transfer between two graphene sheets, Physical Review B 100, 035414 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    H. Wu, Y. Huang, L. Cui, and K. Zhu, Active magneto- optical control of near-field radiative heat transfer be- tween graphene sheets, Physical Review Applied 11, 054020 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Iqbal, S

    N. Iqbal, S. Zhang, S. Wang, Z. Fang, Y. Hu, Y. Dang, M. Zhang, Y. Jin, J. Xu, B. Ju, and Y. Ma, Measuring near-field radiative heat transfer in a graphene-SiC het- erostructure,PhysicalReviewApplied 19,024019(2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    L. Li, Y. Yu, G. J. Ye, Q. Ge, X. Ou, H. Wu, D. Feng, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Black phosphorus field-effect transistors, Nature Nanotechnology9, 372 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    H. Liu, A. T. Neal, Z. Zhu, Z. Luo, X. Xu, D. Tománek, and P. D. Ye, Phosphorene: An unexplored 2D semi- conductor with a high hole mobility, ACS Nano8, 4033 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    J. Lu, J. Yang, A. Carvalho, H. Liu, Y. Lu, and C. H. Sow, Light–matter interactionsin phosphorene, Accounts of Chemical Research49, 1806 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    A. N. Rudenko and M. I. Katsnelson, Quasiparticle band structure and tight-binding model for single- and bilayer black phosphorus, Physical Review B89, 201408 (2014)

    2014

  60. [68]

    M. G. Menezes and R. B. Capaz, Tight binding parametrization of few-layer black phosphorus from first- principles calculations, Computational Materials Science 143, 411 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    A. S. Rodin, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, Strain- induced gap modification in black phosphorus, Physical Review Letters112, 176801 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    Taghizadeh Sisakht, F

    E. Taghizadeh Sisakht, F. Fazileh, M. H. Zare, M. Zare- nia, and F. M. Peeters, Strain-induced topological phase transition in phosphorene and in phosphorene nanorib- bons, Physical Review B94, 085417 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Midtvedt, C

    D. Midtvedt, C. H. Lewenkopf, and A. Croy, Multi-scale approach for strain-engineering of phosphorene, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 185702 (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    Nemilentsau, T

    A. Nemilentsau, T. Low, and G. Hanson, Anisotropic 2D materialsfortunablehyperbolicplasmonics,PhysicalRe- view Letters116, 066804 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    van Veen, A

    E. van Veen, A. Nemilentsau, A. Kumar, R. Roldán, M. I. Katsnelson, T. Low, and S. Yuan, Tuning two- dimensional hyperbolic plasmons in black phosphorus, Physical Review Applied12, 014011 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    L. Sun, G. Zhang, S. Zhang, and J. Ji, Enhanced spon- taneous emission of quantum emitter in monolayer and double layer black phosphorus, Optics Express25, 14270 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Thiyam, P

    P. Thiyam, P. Parashar, K. V. Shajesh, O. I. Malyi, M. Boström, K. A. Milton, I. Brevik, and C. Persson, Distance-dependent sign reversal in the Casimir-Lifshitz torque, Physical Review Letters120, 131601 (2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    H. Mu, T. Wang, D. Zhang, W. Liu, T. Yu, and Q. Liao, Mechanical modulation of spontaneous emission of nearby nanostructured black phosphorus, Optics Ex- press 29, 1037 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    Sikder, S

    B. Sikder, S. H. Nayem, and S. Z. Uddin, Deep ultraviolet spontaneous emission enhanced by layer dependent black phosphorus plasmonics, Optics Express30, 47152 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    Z. Tao, I. R. Lavor, H. Dong, A. Chaves, D. Neilson, and M. V. Milošević, Chiral propagation of plasmon polari- tons due to competing anisotropies in a twisted photonic heterostructure, Nano Letters24, 15745 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: 60th Anniversary Edition, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Amorim, P

    B. Amorim, P. A. D. Gonçalves, M. I. Vasilevskiy, and N. M. R. Peres, Impact of graphene on the polarizability of a neighbour nanoparticle: A dyadic Green’s function study, Applied Sciences7, 1158 (2017)

    2017

  73. [81]

    V. D. Karanikolas, C. A. Marocico, and A. L. Bradley, Tunable and long-range energy transfer effi- ciency through a graphene nanodisk, Physical Review B 93, 035426 (2016)

    2016

  74. [82]

    Ding, L.-Y

    W. Ding, L.-Y. Hsu, and G. C. Schatz, Plasmon-coupled resonance energy transfer: A real-time electrodynamics approach, The Journal of Chemical Physics146, 064109 9 (2017)

    2017

  75. [83]

    Wu, Y.-C

    J.-S. Wu, Y.-C. Lin, Y.-L. Sheu, and L.-Y. Hsu, Char- acteristic distance of resonance energy transfer coupled with surface plasmon polaritons, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters9, 7032 (2018)

    2018

  76. [84]

    Rodriguez-Lopez, D.-N

    P. Rodriguez-Lopez, D.-N. Le, I. V. Bondarev, M. An- tezza, and L. M. Woods, Giant anisotropy and Casimir phenomena: The case of carbon nanotube metasurfaces, Physical Review B109, 035422 (2024)

    2024

  77. [85]

    X. Li, H. Liu, C. Ke, W. Tang, M. Liu, F. Huang, Y. Wu, Z. Wu, and J. Kang, Review of anisotropic 2D materials: Controlled growth, optical anisotropy modulation, and photonic applications, Laser & Photonics Reviews 15, 2100322 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    Wald,Advanced Classical Electromagnetism (Prince- ton University Press, 2022)

    R. Wald,Advanced Classical Electromagnetism (Prince- ton University Press, 2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    E. D. Palik, Handbook of optical constants of solids, Vol. 3 (Academic press, 1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.