Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 190 references

Mapping the Landscape of Generative AI in Network Monitoring and Management

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new survey claims to be the first to focus primarily on generative AI for network monitoring and management, mapping 189 works into a two-axis taxonomy of five use cases and five architecture families.

desk verdict A useful but over-inclusive map: most of the 189 entries are not GenAI under the paper's own definition. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08576 v2 pith:UXFH45TB submitted 2025-02-12 cs.NI cs.AIcs.LG

Giampaolo Bovenzi , Francesco Cerasuolo , Domenico Ciuonzo , Davide Di Monda , Idio Guarino , Antonio Montieri , Valerio Persico , Antonio Pescapè This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NIcs.AIcs.LG
keywords generativeAInetworkmonitoringandmanagementtrafficgenerationclassificationintrusiondetectionloganalysisdigitalassistancesurveytaxonomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey claims to be the first literature review centered specifically on generative AI for network monitoring and management, and it maps 189 works into five use cases: traffic generation, traffic classification, intrusion detection, log analysis, and network digital assistance. The authors categorize each work by GenAI architecture, training strategy, input representation, dataset, and code availability, with an explicit emphasis on reproducibility. They argue that earlier surveys either covered networking only at a general level or focused on lower-layer telecom aspects and GAN-based methods, while this one centers the latest Transformer, diffusion, and state-space models. If the mapping is accurate, it gives researchers and practitioners a structured entry point to the field and exposes gaps such as scarce code release and reliance on outdated intrusion datasets.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is a two-axis taxonomy: five NMM use cases (traffic generation, traffic classification, intrusion detection, log analysis, and digital assistance) cross-referenced with five GenAI architecture families (full encoder-decoder, encoder-only, decoder-only, sequential denoising or diffusion, and selective state-space models). Supporting machinery includes the datagram-to-token and datagram-to-image transformations that adapt raw traffic to model inputs, together with a per-work record of architecture, training strategy, input, datasets, and code availability. The taxonomy does the work of converting a scattered literature into a reproducible map and of supporting claims about dominance (BERT and GPT families) and gaps (few code releases, outdated intrusion datasets).

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to replicate the survey's selection by defining a systematic search protocol (databases, queries, inclusion and exclusion rules) and comparing the resulting corpus with the 189 works; if a substantial number of post-2021 Transformer-based NMM papers are missing, or if including GAN- and VAE-based papers changes the use-case distribution materially, the landscape claim would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that no prior survey of recent GenAI advances has network monitoring and management as its primary focus, and that the 189 works reviewed here form a coherent landscape that can be classified along two orthogonal axes: NMM use case and GenAI architecture. For each of the five use cases, the survey provides a taxonomy of solutions with details on the base model, whether and how it was pre-trained and fine-tuned, the traffic object and data format fed to the model (text tokens versus images), the datasets used, and whether code is released. A model-centric view groups architectures into full encoder-decoder, encoder-only, decoder-only, sequential denoising (diffusion), and selective state-space models, and shows that BERT- and GPT-family models dominate while Mamba has only recently begun to appear. The authors also derive cross-cutting observations: most traffic-classification works train from scratch on networking corpora, most intrusion-detection works fine-tune pre-trained models, and only six of the reviewed frameworks publish their code.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 189 reviewed works are a representative sample of the GenAI-for-NMM literature, which depends on unpublished selection criteria: works from 2021 onward, Transformer-based or newer architectures, and exclusion of GANs, variational autoencoders, and normalizing flows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Newcomers to the field can locate the state of the art per use case and per architecture without re-reading all 189 reviewed papers.
  • The finding that only six reviewed works release code implies that reproducibility in this literature is currently low and that establishing shared benchmarks would be a high-value next step.
  • Because traffic-classification models are largely pre-trained from scratch on networking corpora while intrusion-detection models are mostly fine-tuned from general-purpose language models, the two tasks likely need different advancement strategies.
  • The prevalence of older intrusion datasets such as CIC-IDS2017 and KDD'99 indicates that evaluation on contemporary traffic remains an open problem.
  • The recent appearance of Mamba-based solutions in traffic generation and classification suggests state-space models will be an active area for NMM research.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One implicit consequence is that the five-use-case split is a classification choice rather than a natural kind: intrusion detection and traffic classification overlap heavily, and a different survey could merge them and arrive at different counts.
  • The deliberate exclusion of GANs, variational autoencoders, and normalizing flows means the 189-work figure describes only the post-Transformer slice of the literature, not the whole GenAI-for-NMM field.
  • A testable extension would be to apply the same taxonomy to a differently selected corpus, for example one that includes GAN- and VAE-based works, and compare the resulting use-case and architecture distributions to see whether the reported dominance of BERT and GPT families persists.
  • The emphasis on reproducibility could be operationalized as a living table that tracks code availability and dataset currency over time, turning the static survey into a continuously checkable resource.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper surveys applications of generative AI (GenAI) to network monitoring and management (NMM), organizing 189 works into five use cases: network traffic generation, traffic classification, intrusion detection, system log analysis, and digital assistance. It provides per-work tables with architecture, training strategy, input representation, datasets, and code availability, along with a model-centric overview, a dataset/platform review, and a discussion of limitations and future directions. The paper positions itself as the first NMM-centered GenAI survey, contrasting its depth with related surveys that focus on IoT, cybersecurity, or lower-layer telecom issues.

Significance. If the scope is clarified, this is a useful reference-level survey. Its strengths are the breadth and granularity of the tables, the explicit marking of inferred entries with an asterisk, the attention to code and dataset availability, and the inclusion of very recent Diffusion and State Space Model works that other surveys have not systematically covered. The model-centric view in Sec. V and the dataset lifecycle discussion in Sec. VI are valuable contributions. The central claims, however, rest on an implicit and internally inconsistent definition of what counts as GenAI, and the absence of a search protocol prevents independent verification of completeness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III-A, Sec. III-C, Tables IV–V] The paper's formal definition of GenAI in Sec. III-A is learning pmod(x) ≈ pd(x) and sampling new data, and Sec. III-C explicitly says Encoder-Only models are 'designed for text understanding and analysis rather than generation.' Nevertheless, Tables IV and V classify many purely discriminative models as GenAI solutions, including BERT-based classifiers [90, 92, 95, 96, 100, 65], a ViT classifier [93], and RoBERTa/ALBERT classifiers [86, 88]. These models do not sample from pmod(x), so the 189-work corpus is not a GenAI corpus under the paper's own definition. This changes the object of the survey, inflates the use-case counts, and makes the claimed 'GenAI landscape' unfalsifiable: any Transformer-based NMM work could in principle be included. The operative selection rule appears to be 'Transformer-architecture onward,' not 'generative.'
  2. [Sec. II-C, Sec. III-B, Sec. IV] The manuscript never reports a search protocol. It states the time window (2021 onward), the architectural focus (Transformer onward), and the exclusion of GANs, VAEs, and normalizing flows, but it does not give the databases queried, the query strings, the search dates, the screening rules, or any flow diagram of the selection process. Because the paper's stated contribution is a reproducible-oriented map of the landscape and its novelty depends on the representativeness of the 189 reviewed works, the absence of this protocol means a different research group could assemble a different corpus and reach a different landscape using the same stated criteria. Completeness cannot be independently assessed.
  3. [Sec. II-C, Sec. III-A] The formal definition of GenAI in Sec. III-A also covers VAEs, GANs, and normalizing flows, but Sec. II-C deliberately excludes these families. This is a defensible editorial choice, yet it means the survey is not a map of 'GenAI for NMM' as formally defined; it is a map of a chosen subset, roughly 'modern Transformer-based generative and representation-learning models.' The title and the positioning claim in Sec. II-C should be adjusted to reflect this narrowed scope, or the formal definition should be revised, so that the claimed first landscape does not overreach.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III-C, footnote 3] The 1.7-trillion-parameter estimate for GPT-4 is cited to a blog post (the-decoder.com); this should be replaced by a verifiable primary source or explicitly labeled as an unconfirmed estimate.
  2. [Sec. VI-A] The sentence 'all the works falling within the NTC ... train from scratch the GenAI architecture' appears to contradict Table IV, where every NTC entry shows a pre-training stage; please rephrase to avoid an inconsistency with the table.
  3. [Tables III–VII] The tables are information-dense and use many abbreviations (NetPT, TO, PT&FT, etc.); consider adding a unified glossary near the first table and possibly moving the full tables to an appendix or supplement for readability.
  4. [Sec. II-A] Several factual claims about industry efforts (e.g., the Huawei Net Master corpus size and TIM's GenAI integration) rely on vendor press releases; a brief note distinguishing vendor-reported figures from independently verifiable facts would strengthen the survey's reliability.
  5. [Sec. IV-F] Typo: 'TaleQnAD' should be 'TeleQuAD' (or 'TeleQnA,' depending on the intended dataset name).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the survey makes no predictive or derived claim, and the few self-citations are illustrative references rather than load-bearing evidence.

full rationale

This is a literature survey, so there is no derivation chain in which an output is constructed from its own inputs. The central claims are that no prior survey primarily focuses on GenAI for NMM, that 189 works are taxonomized across five use cases, and that the corpus covers GenAI from the Transformer onward while excluding GANs, VAEs, and normalizing flows. These are scope and bibliographic judgments, not fitted predictions or theorem derivations. The authors' own prior work appears only as cited examples within the surveyed literature (e.g., references [32], [33], [60], and [184]) and is not used to justify the existence, size, or contents of the corpus. The selection criteria are stated in the paper (Transformer onward, five architecture families, exclusion of GANs/VAEs/normalizing flows), even though no search protocol is given; the absence of a protocol is a reproducibility limitation, not circular reasoning. The inclusion of encoder-only discriminative models such as BERT and ViT in the NID/NTC tables creates an internal tension with the paper's formal definition of GenAI as sampling new data, but that is a scope or definitional inconsistency rather than a circular reduction, because the survey's descriptive claims do not depend on those models being generative by construction. No step in the paper reduces a claimed result to its own input or to a self-citation chain, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its content is taxonomic, so the central output depends on the framing assumptions listed above, especially the five-use-case partition and the implicit representativeness of the selected works.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The GenAI-for-NMM literature can be partitioned into five use cases: NTG, NTC, NID, NSLA, NDA.
    This taxonomy is introduced by the authors in Sec. IV-A to organize the survey; it is not derived from a prior framework or from a data-driven clustering.
  • domain assumption GANs, VAEs, and normalizing flows are less relevant than Transformer-based, diffusion, and SSM models for current GenAI-for-NMM work.
    Stated in Sec. II-C as a scope decision: these families are 'considered less relevant compared to the latest advancements in GenAI.'
  • domain assumption Works published before 2021 and architectures before the Transformer do not need to be surveyed for the current landscape.
    Sec. III-B states the survey 'focuses only on works that take advantage of the most recent advances in GenAI, specifically from the Transformer architecture onward,' and Tables III-VII cover works from 2021 to 2024.
  • domain assumption The 189 works selected by the authors are representative of the overall GenAI-for-NMM literature.
    No search protocol or inclusion/exclusion criteria are provided, so representativeness rests on the authors' expertise and implicit selection.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mapping the Landscape of Generative AI in Network Monitoring and Management." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UXFH45TB

@misc{pith2026250208576,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mapping the Landscape of Generative AI in Network Monitoring and Management},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UXFH45TB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08576}
}
read the original abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) models such as LLMs, GPTs, and Diffusion Models have recently gained widespread attention from both the research and the industrial communities. This survey explores their application in network monitoring and management, focusing on prominent use cases, as well as challenges and opportunities. We discuss how network traffic generation and classification, network intrusion detection, networked system log analysis, and network digital assistance can benefit from the use of GenAI models. Additionally, we provide an overview of the available GenAI models, datasets for large-scale training phases, and platforms for the development of such models. Finally, we discuss research directions that potentially mitigate the roadblocks to the adoption of GenAI for network monitoring and management. Our investigation aims to map the current landscape and pave the way for future research in leveraging GenAI for network monitoring and management.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08576 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. outlines the organization of the present survey, sketch￾ing the details of the sections constituting the manuscript. II. MOTIVATION OF GENAI IN NETWORK MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT: CONTEXT AND RELATED WORKS In this section, we examine the increasing interest from both public and private stakeholders in using GenAI to support NMM processes (Sec. II-A). Next, we discuss related surveys that analyze the impact of GenAI m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Timeline of GenAI development: while introducing VAN-based and GAN-based solutions, this work primarily focuses on developments from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Overview of the general workflow of Diffusion Models, including (a) forward and (b) reverse diffusion processes. C. Recent Advancements on GenAI Focusing on the most recent advancements in GenAI, namely from Transformer onward, we can identify five categories of architecture divided according to the nature of the underlying layers. We identify three variants of the Transformer architecture, namely the (i) full encod… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of the general workflow of Mamba: the Convolutional (Conv) layer extracts relevant features from input data, focusing on spatial or temporal patterns; the Selective SSM layer filters and selects the most relevant latent states from the extracted features. chit…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Overview of NMM use cases, leveraging GenAI, explored in this [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Possible interactions among NTC, NTG, NDA, NSLA, and NID to enhance network management efficiency, highlighting the key pathways and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pipeline for NMM use cases with GenAI models, detailing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Limitations (left-side), represented by roadblocks that highlight the current challenges in the adoption and implementation of GenAI for network monitoring and management. Future directions (right-side), grouped into five categories distinguished by different colors, a…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

190 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [93]

    Network Intru- sion Detection via Flow-to-Image Conversion and Vision Transformer Classification,

    C. M. K. Ho, K.-C. Yow, Z. Zhu, and S. Aravamuthan, “Network Intru- sion Detection via Flow-to-Image Conversion and Vision Transformer Classification,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 97 780–97 793, 2022

    2022

  2. [1]

    Harnessing the power of llms in practice: A survey on chatgpt and beyond,

    J. Yang, H. Jin, R. Tang, X. Han, Q. Feng, H. Jiang, S. Zhong, B. Yin, and X. Hu, “Harnessing the power of llms in practice: A survey on chatgpt and beyond,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1–32, 2024

    2024

  3. [2]

    Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market Size Worldwide from 2020 to 2030,

    “Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market Size Worldwide from 2020 to 2030,” https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1449838/generative- ai-market-size-worldwide

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [3]

    When Digital Twin Meets Generative AI: Intelligent Closed-Loop Network Management

    X. Huang, H. Yang, C. Zhou, X. Shen, and W. Zhuang, “When Digital Twin Meets Generative AI: Intelligent Closed-Loop Network Management,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03025 , 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [4]

    The Age of Generative AI and AI-generated Everything,

    H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, P. Zhang, S. Cui, X. Shen, S. Mao, Z. Han, A. Jamalipour et al., “The Age of Generative AI and AI-generated Everything,” IEEE Network, 2024

    2024

  6. [5]

    Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems,

    A. Lavin, C. M. Gilligan-Lee, A. Visnjic, S. Ganju, D. Newman, S. Ganguly, D. Lange, A. G. Baydin, A. Sharma, A. Gibson et al. , “Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 6039, 2022

    2022

  7. [6]

    Landing AI on Networks: An Equipment Ven- dor Viewpoint on Autonomous Driving Networks,

    D. Rossi and L. Zhang, “Landing AI on Networks: An Equipment Ven- dor Viewpoint on Autonomous Driving Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 3670–3684, 2022

    2022

  8. [7]

    The Networking Channel,

    “The Networking Channel,” https://networkingchannel.eu/library/

Show all 190 references
  1. [8]

    AT&T’s new Generative AI Tool Will Help Employees Be More Effective, Creative, and Innovative,

    “AT&T’s new Generative AI Tool Will Help Employees Be More Effective, Creative, and Innovative,” https://about.att.com/blogs/2023/ generative-ai.html

    2023

  2. [9]

    Cisco Artificial Intelligence,

    “Cisco Artificial Intelligence,” https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/ solutions/artificial-intelligence/ai-assistant/index.html

  3. [10]

    How to Make Better Use of Network Insights with Gen- erative AI,

    “How to Make Better Use of Network Insights with Gen- erative AI,” https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2024/2/how-to-make- better-use-of-network-insights-with-generative-ai

    2024

  4. [11]

    European Innovation Council,

    “European Innovation Council,” https://eic.ec.europa.eu/index_en

  5. [12]

    Huawei Introduces AI Technologies to Accelerate Network Trans- formation Towards All Intelligence in the Net5.5G Era,

    “Huawei Introduces AI Technologies to Accelerate Network Trans- formation Towards All Intelligence in the Net5.5G Era,” https://www. huawei.com/en/news/2024/4/has-net-5-point-5g-ai

    2024

  6. [13]

    Welcome to the Large Generative Al Models inTelecom (GenAlNet) Emerging TechnologyInitiative website,

    “Welcome to the Large Generative Al Models inTelecom (GenAlNet) Emerging TechnologyInitiative website,” https://genainet.committees. comsoc.org/

  7. [14]

    IETF Side Meetings,

    “IETF Side Meetings,” https://wiki.ietf.org/en/meeting/119/ sidemeetings

  8. [15]

    Specializing Large Language Models for Telecom Networks,

    “Specializing Large Language Models for Telecom Networks,” https://aiforgood.itu.int/event/specializing-large-language-models-for- telecom-networks/

  9. [16]

    Generative AI implications for Telco Operations,

    “Generative AI implications for Telco Operations,” https://www.bell- labs.com/institute/white-papers/generative-ai-implications-for-telco- operations/

  10. [17]

    Telefónica Partners with Microsoft to Incorporate Generative AI into Kernel,

    “Telefónica Partners with Microsoft to Incorporate Generative AI into Kernel,” https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/press- room/telefonica-partners-with-microsoft-to-incorporate-generative-ai- into-kernel/

  11. [18]

    Generative AI: the challenge of TIM for the future of IT,

    “Generative AI: the challenge of TIM for the future of IT,” https:// www.gruppotim.it/it/newsroom/notiziario-tecnico-tim/Anno-2023/n3- 2023/Generative_AI_la_sfida_TIM_per_il_futuro_dell_IT.html

    2023

  12. [19]

    Empowering IoT with Generative AI: Applications, Case Studies, and Limitations,

    S. Sai, M. Kanadia, and V . Chamola, “Empowering IoT with Generative AI: Applications, Case Studies, and Limitations,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 38–43, 2024

    2024

  13. [20]

    A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Cyber Defences: Opportunities and Directions,

    M. Hassanin and N. Moustafa, “A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Cyber Defences: Opportunities and Directions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14487 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Machine Learning Techniques for IoT Security: Current Research and Future Vision with Generative AI and Large Language Models,

    F. Alwahedi, A. Aldhaheri, M. A. Ferrag, A. Battah, and N. Tihanyi, “Machine Learning Techniques for IoT Security: Current Research and Future Vision with Generative AI and Large Language Models,” Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems , vol. 4, pp. 167–185, 2024

    2024

  15. [22]

    Applying Generative Machine Learning to Intrusion Detection: A Systematic Mapping Study and Review,

    J. Halvorsen, C. Izurieta, H. Cai, and A. Gebremedhin, “Applying Generative Machine Learning to Intrusion Detection: A Systematic Mapping Study and Review,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 10, 2024

    2024

  16. [23]

    Large Language Model (LLM) for Telecom- munications: A Comprehensive Survey on Principles, Key Techniques, and Opportunities,

    H. Zhou, C. Hu, Y . Yuan, Y . Cui, Y . Jin, C. Chen, H. Wu, D. Yuan, L. Jiang, D. Wu et al., “Large Language Model (LLM) for Telecom- munications: A Comprehensive Survey on Principles, Key Techniques, and Opportunities,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10825 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    At the dawn of generative AI era: A tutorial-cum-survey on new frontiers in 6G wireless intelligence,

    A. Celik and A. M. Eltawil, “At the dawn of generative AI era: A tutorial-cum-survey on new frontiers in 6G wireless intelligence,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2024

    2024

  18. [25]

    Generative AI in Mobile Networks: a Survey,

    A. Karapantelakis, P. Alizadeh, A. Alabassi, K. Dey, and A. Nikou, “Generative AI in Mobile Networks: a Survey,” Annals of Telecommu- nications, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 2024

    2024

  19. [26]

    Large Language Models for Networking: Workflow, Advances and Challenges,

    C. Liu, X. Xie, X. Zhang, and Y . Cui, “Large Language Models for Networking: Workflow, Advances and Challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12901, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Large Language Models for Networking: Applications, En- abling Techniques, and Challenges,

    Y . Huang, H. Du, X. Zhang, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Wang, and T. Huang, “Large Language Models for Networking: Applications, En- abling Techniques, and Challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17474, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Tele- com’s Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Vision: Beyond the GenAI Frontier,

    C. Chaccour, A. Karapantelakis, T. Murphy, and M. Dohler, “Tele- com’s Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Vision: Beyond the GenAI Frontier,” IEEE Network, 2024

    2024

  22. [29]

    Generative AI and Large Language Models for Cyber Security: All Insights You Need,

    M. A. Ferrag, F. Alwahedi, A. Battah, B. Cherif, A. Mechri, and N. Tihanyi, “Generative AI and Large Language Models for Cyber Security: All Insights You Need,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12750 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Unleashing the Power of Edge-Cloud Generative AI in Mobile Networks: A Survey of AIGC Services,

    M. Xu, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Mao, Z. Han, A. Jamalipour, D. I. Kim, X. Shen et al. , “Unleashing the Power of Edge-Cloud Generative AI in Mobile Networks: A Survey of AIGC Services,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2024

    2024

  24. [31]

    Toward Scalable Generative AI via Mixture of Experts in Mobile Edge Networks,

    J. Wang, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, D. I. Kim, and K. B. Letaief, “Toward Scalable Generative AI via Mixture of Experts in Mobile Edge Networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06942 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Characterization and prediction of mobile-app traffic using Markov modeling,

    G. Aceto, G. Bovenzi, D. Ciuonzo, A. Montieri, V . Persico, and A. Pescapé, “Characterization and prediction of mobile-app traffic using Markov modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 907–925, 2021

    2021

  26. [33]

    Synthetic and Privacy-Preserving Traffic Trace Gen- eration using Generative AI Models for Training Network Intrusion Detection Systems,

    G. Aceto, F. Giampaolo, C. Guida, S. Izzo, A. Pescapè, F. Piccialli, and E. Prezioso, “Synthetic and Privacy-Preserving Traffic Trace Gen- eration using Generative AI Models for Training Network Intrusion Detection Systems,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications , p. 10...

    2024

  27. [34]

    Knowledge enhanced GAN for IoT traffic generation,

    S. Hui, H. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Yang, Z. Liu, D. Jin, and Y . Li, “Knowledge enhanced GAN for IoT traffic generation,” in ACM Web Conference (WWW), 2022, pp. 3336–3346

    2022

  28. [35]

    CFLOW-AD: real-time unsupervised anomaly detection with localization via conditional nor- malizing flows,

    D. Gudovskiy, S. Ishizaka, and K. Kozuka, “CFLOW-AD: real-time unsupervised anomaly detection with localization via conditional nor- malizing flows,” in IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2022, pp. 98–107

    2022

  29. [36]

    Auto-encoding variational Bayes,

    D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational Bayes,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2014

    2014

  30. [37]

    Attention is All You Need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is All You Need,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  31. [38]

    NICE: Non-linear independent components estimation,

    L. Dinh, D. Krueger, and Y . Bengio, “NICE: Non-linear independent components estimation,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Workshop Track, 2015

    2015

  32. [39]

    Network Traffic Generation: A Survey and Methodology,

    O. A. Adeleke, N. Bastin, and D. Gurkan, “Network Traffic Generation: A Survey and Methodology,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2022. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOL. XX, NO. X, XXXX 2025 29

    2022

  33. [40]

    Generative Adversarial Nets,

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y . Bengio, “Generative Adversarial Nets,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 27, 2014

    2014

  34. [41]

    Conditional generative adversarial nets,

    M. Mirza and S. Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784 , 2014

    2014 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks,

    A. Radford, L. Metz, and S. Chintala, “Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2016

    2016

  36. [43]

    Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric,

    A. B. L. Larsen, S. K. Sønderby, H. Larochelle, and O. Winther, “Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric,” in International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2016, pp. 1558–1566

    2016

  37. [44]

    Density estimation using Real NVP,

    L. Dinh, J. Sohl-Dickstein, and S. Bengio, “Density estimation using Real NVP,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2017

    2017

  38. [45]

    On the opportunities and risks of foundation models,

    R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman, S. Arora, S. von Arx, M. S. Bernstein, J. Bohg, A. Bosselut, E. Brunskill et al. , “On the opportunities and risks of foundation models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  39. [46]

    BERT: Pre- training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understand- ing,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre- training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understand- ing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 , 2018

    2018 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training,

    A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, T. Salimans, I. Sutskever et al., “Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training,” OpenAI Tech Report, 2018

    2018

  41. [48]

    Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Mod- els,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Mod- els,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  42. [49]

    Understanding diffusion objectives as the elbo with simple data augmentation,

    D. Kingma and R. Gao, “Understanding diffusion objectives as the elbo with simple data augmentation,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  43. [50]

    Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces,

    A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Memory-efficient fine-tuning of compressed large language models via sub-4-bit integer quantization,

    J. Kim, J. H. Lee, S. Kim, J. Park, K. M. Yoo, S. J. Kwon, and D. Lee, “Memory-efficient fine-tuning of compressed large language models via sub-4-bit integer quantization,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  45. [52]

    LoRa: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,

    E. J. Hu, Y . Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y . Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, and W. Chen, “LoRa: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2022

    2022

  46. [53]

    NetDiffusion: Network Data Augmenta- tion Through Protocol-Constrained Traffic Generation,

    X. Jiang, S. Liu, A. Gember-Jacobson, A. N. Bhagoji, P. Schmitt, F. Bronzino, and N. Feamster, “NetDiffusion: Network Data Augmenta- tion Through Protocol-Constrained Traffic Generation,” Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems , vol. 8, no. 1, ...

    2024

  47. [54]

    Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models,

    N. Ding, Y . Qin, G. Yang, F. Wei, Z. Yang, Y . Su, S. Hu, Y . Chen, C.- M. Chan, W. Chen et al., “Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models,” Nature Machine Intelligence , vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 220–235, 2023

    2023

  48. [55]

    Available: https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml/blob/ master/docs/gguf.md

    “GGUF.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml/blob/ master/docs/gguf.md

  49. [56]

    Using Large Language Models to Understand Telecom Standards,

    A. Karapantelakis, M. Shakur, A. Nikou, F. Moradi, C. Orlog, F. Gaim, H. Holm, D. D. Nimara, and V . Huang, “Using Large Language Models to Understand Telecom Standards,” in IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning for Communication and Networking (ICMLCN) , 2024

    2024

  50. [57]

    NetGPT: Genera- tive Pretrained Transformer for Network Traffic,

    X. Meng, C. Lin, Y . Wang, and Y . Zhang, “NetGPT: Genera- tive Pretrained Transformer for Network Traffic,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09513, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Towards the Deployment of Machine Learning Solutions in Network Traffic Classification: A Systematic Survey,

    F. Pacheco, E. Exposito, M. Gineste, C. Baudoin, and J. Aguilar, “Towards the Deployment of Machine Learning Solutions in Network Traffic Classification: A Systematic Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1988–2014, 2018

    1988

  52. [59]

    Network Traffic Classification: Techniques, Datasets, and Challenges,

    A. Azab, M. Khasawneh, S. Alrabaee, K.-K. R. Choo, and M. Sarsour, “Network Traffic Classification: Techniques, Datasets, and Challenges,” Digital Communications and Networks , 2022

    2022

  53. [60]

    AI- powered Internet Traffic Classification: Past, Present, and Future,

    G. Aceto, D. Ciuonzo, A. Montieri, V . Persico, and A. Pescape, “AI- powered Internet Traffic Classification: Past, Present, and Future,”IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 1–7, 2023

    2023

  54. [61]

    ET-BERT: A Con- textualized Datagram Representation with Pre-training Transformers for Encrypted Traffic Classification,

    X. Lin, G. Xiong, G. Gou, Z. Li, J. Shi, and J. Yu, “ET-BERT: A Con- textualized Datagram Representation with Pre-training Transformers for Encrypted Traffic Classification,” in ACM Web Conference (WWW), 2022, p. 633–642

    2022

  55. [62]

    NetMamba: Efficient Network Traffic Classification via Pre-training Unidirectional Mamba,

    T. Wang, X. Xie, W. Wang, C. Wang, Y . Zhao, and Y . Cui, “NetMamba: Efficient Network Traffic Classification via Pre-training Unidirectional Mamba,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11449 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    A Survey on Data-driven Network Intrusion Detection,

    D. Chou and M. Jiang, “A Survey on Data-driven Network Intrusion Detection,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 1–36, 2021

    2021

  57. [64]

    FlowTransformer: A Transformer Framework for Flow-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems,

    L. D. Manocchio, S. Layeghy, W. W. Lo, G. K. Kulatilleke, M. Sarhan, and M. Portmann, “FlowTransformer: A Transformer Framework for Flow-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 241, p. 122564, 2024

    2024

  58. [65]

    Revolutionizing Cyber Threat Detec- tion With Large Language Models: A Privacy-Preserving BERT-based Lightweight Model for IoT/IIoT Devices,

    M. A. Ferrag, M. Ndhlovu, N. Tihanyi, L. C. Cordeiro, M. Debbah, T. Lestable, and N. S. Thandi, “Revolutionizing Cyber Threat Detec- tion With Large Language Models: A Privacy-Preserving BERT-based Lightweight Model for IoT/IIoT Devices,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, pp. 23 733–23 750, 2024

    2024

  59. [66]

    A Survey on Automated Log Analysis for Reliability Engineering,

    S. He, P. He, Z. Chen, T. Yang, Y . Su, and M. R. Lyu, “A Survey on Automated Log Analysis for Reliability Engineering,” ACM computing surveys, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–37, 2021

    2021

  60. [67]

    LogGPT: Log Anomaly Detection via GPT,

    X. Han, S. Yuan, and M. Trabelsi, “LogGPT: Log Anomaly Detection via GPT,” in IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) , 2023, pp. 1117–1122

    2023

  61. [68]

    LogPrécis: Unleashing Language Models for Automated Malicious Log Analysis: Précis: A Concise Summary of Essential Points, Statements, or Facts,

    M. Boffa, I. Drago, M. Mellia, L. Vassio, D. Giordano, R. Valentim, and Z. B. Houidi, “LogPrécis: Unleashing Language Models for Automated Malicious Log Analysis: Précis: A Concise Summary of Essential Points, Statements, or Facts,” Computers & Security , vol. 141, p. 103805, 2024

    2024

  62. [69]

    Network Management Challenges and Trends in Multi-Layer and Multi-Vendor Settings for Carrier-Grade Networks,

    A. Martinez, M. Yannuzzi, V . López, D. López, W. Ramírez, R. Serral- Gracià, X. Masip-Bruin, M. Maciejewski, and J. Altmann, “Network Management Challenges and Trends in Multi-Layer and Multi-Vendor Settings for Carrier-Grade Networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials...

    2014

  63. [70]

    Network Management in the Era of Ecosystems: Systematic Review and Management Framework,

    L. Aarikka-Stenroos and P. Ritala, “Network Management in the Era of Ecosystems: Systematic Review and Management Framework,” Industrial Marketing Management , vol. 67, pp. 23–36, 2017

    2017

  64. [71]

    A Review of IoT Network Management: Current Status and Perspectives,

    M. Aboubakar, M. Kellil, and P. Roux, “A Review of IoT Network Management: Current Status and Perspectives,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences , vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 4163–4176, 2022

    2022

  65. [72]

    Network Meets ChatGPT: Intent Autonomous Management, Control and Operation,

    J. Wang, L. Zhang, Y . Yang, Z. Zhuang, Q. Qi, H. Sun, L. Lu, J. Feng, and J. Liao, “Network Meets ChatGPT: Intent Autonomous Management, Control and Operation,” Journal of Communications and Information Networks, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 239–255, 2023

    2023

  66. [73]

    New Directions in Automated Traffic Analysis,

    J. Holland, P. Schmitt, N. Feamster, and P. Mittal, “New Directions in Automated Traffic Analysis,” in ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) , 2021, pp. 3366–3383

    2021

  67. [74]

    Flowpic: A generic representation for encrypted traffic classification and applications identification,

    T. Shapira and Y . Shavitt, “Flowpic: A generic representation for encrypted traffic classification and applications identification,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1218–1232, 2021

    2021

  68. [75]

    NetDiffus: Network Traffic Gen- eration by Diffusion Models through Time-Series Imaging,

    N. Sivaroopan, D. Bandara, C. Madarasingha, G. Jourjon, A. P. Jayasumana, and K. Thilakarathna, “NetDiffus: Network Traffic Gen- eration by Diffusion Models through Time-Series Imaging,” Computer Networks, vol. 251, p. 110616, 2024

    2024

  69. [76]

    Multi-Class Network Traffic Generators and Classifiers Based on Neural Networks,

    R. F. Bikmukhamedov and A. F. Nadeev, “Multi-Class Network Traffic Generators and Classifiers Based on Neural Networks,” in Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications, 2021, pp. 1–7

    2021

  70. [77]

    PAC-GPT: A Novel Approach to Generating Synthetic Network Traffic With GPT-3,

    D. K. Kholgh and P. Kostakos, “PAC-GPT: A Novel Approach to Generating Synthetic Network Traffic With GPT-3,” IEEE Access , vol. 11, pp. 114 936–114 951, 2023

    2023

  71. [78]

    LENS: A Foundation Model for Network Traffic,

    Q. Wang, C. Qian, X. Li, Z. Yao, and H. Shao, “LENS: A Foundation Model for Network Traffic,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03646 , 2024

    2024

  72. [79]

    TrafficGPT: Breaking the Token Barrier for Efficient Long Traffic Analysis and Generation,

    J. Qu, X. Ma, and J. Li, “TrafficGPT: Breaking the Token Barrier for Efficient Long Traffic Analysis and Generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05822, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Feasibility of state space models for network traffic generation,

    A. Chu, X. Jiang, S. Liu, A. Bhagoji, F. Bronzino, P. Schmitt, and N. Feamster, “Feasibility of state space models for network traffic generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02784 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  74. [81]

    NetDiff: A Service-Guided Hierarchical Diffusion Model for Network Flow Trace Generation,

    S. Zhang, T. Li, D. Jin, and Y . Li, “NetDiff: A Service-Guided Hierarchical Diffusion Model for Network Flow Trace Generation,” Proc. ACM Netw., vol. 2, no. CoNEXT3, Aug. 2024

    2024

  75. [82]

    Lightweight diffusion model for synthe- sizing malicious network traffic,

    F. Li, H. Wu, and J. Zhang, “Lightweight diffusion model for synthe- sizing malicious network traffic,” in NAECON 2024 - IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference , 2024, pp. 409–413

    2024

  76. [83]

    Bench- marking of Synthetic Network Data: Reviewing Challenges and Ap- proaches,

    M. Wolf, J. Tritscher, D. Landes, A. Hotho, and D. Schlör, “Bench- marking of Synthetic Network Data: Reviewing Challenges and Ap- proaches,” Computers & Security , vol. 145, p. 103993, 2024

    2024

  77. [84]

    Imaging Time-series to Improve Classifica- tion and Imputation,

    Z. Wang and T. Oates, “Imaging Time-series to Improve Classifica- tion and Imputation,” in 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), ML Track , 2015, pp. 3939–3945

    2015

  78. [85]

    net- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOL. XX, NO. X, XXXX 2025 30 Found: Foundation Model for Network Security,

    S. Guthula, N. Battula, R. Beltiukov, W. Guo, and A. Gupta, “net- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOL. XX, NO. X, XXXX 2025 30 Found: Foundation Model for Network Security,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17025, 2023

    2025 arXiv

  79. [86]

    An LLM-based Framework for Finger- printing Internet-connected Devices,

    A. Sarabi, T. Yin, and M. Liu, “An LLM-based Framework for Finger- printing Internet-connected Devices,” in ACM on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), 2023, p. 478–484

    2023

  80. [87]

    LAMBERT: Leveraging Attention Mechanisms to Improve the BERT Fine-Tuning Model for Encrypted Traffic Classification,

    T. Liu, X. Ma, L. Liu, X. Liu, Y . Zhao, N. Hu, and K. Z. Ghafoor, “LAMBERT: Leveraging Attention Mechanisms to Improve the BERT Fine-Tuning Model for Encrypted Traffic Classification,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 11, 2024

    2024

  81. [88]

    Encrypted Traffic Classification Framework Based on Albert,

    H. Li, Y . Zhang, M. Gu, J. Bai, Z. Xiao, and Y . Wang, “Encrypted Traffic Classification Framework Based on Albert,” in IGARSS 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , 2024, pp. 10 019–10 024

    2024

  82. [89]

    Intrusion Detection Method using Bi-directional GPT for In-vehicle Controller Area Networks,

    M. Nam, S. Park, and D. S. Kim, “Intrusion Detection Method using Bi-directional GPT for In-vehicle Controller Area Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 124 931–124 944, 2021

    2021

  83. [90]

    Securing Critical Infrastructures: Deep-Learning- Based Threat Detection in IIoT,

    K. Yu, L. Tan, S. Mumtaz, S. Al-Rubaye, A. Al-Dulaimi, A. K. Bashir, and F. A. Khan, “Securing Critical Infrastructures: Deep-Learning- Based Threat Detection in IIoT,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 76–82, 2021

    2021

  84. [91]

    An Extreme Semi-supervised Framework Based on Transformer for Network Intrusion Detection,

    Y . Li, X. Yuan, and W. Li, “An Extreme Semi-supervised Framework Based on Transformer for Network Intrusion Detection,” in 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2022, pp. 4204–4208

    2022

  85. [92]

    An Attack Detection Framework Based on BERT and Deep Learning,

    Y . E. Seyyar, A. G. Yavuz, and H. M. Ünver, “An Attack Detection Framework Based on BERT and Deep Learning,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 68 633–68 644, 2022

    2022

  86. [94]

    RTIDS: A Robust Transformer-Based Approach for Intrusion Detection System,

    Z. Wu, H. Zhang, P. Wang, and Z. Sun, “RTIDS: A Robust Transformer-Based Approach for Intrusion Detection System,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 64 375–64 387, 2022

    2022

  87. [95]

    A Security Model Based on LightGBM and Transformer to Protect Healthcare Systems from Cyberattacks,

    A. Ghourabi, “A Security Model Based on LightGBM and Transformer to Protect Healthcare Systems from Cyberattacks,” IEEE Access , vol. 10, pp. 48 890–48 903, 2022

    2022

  88. [96]

    Intrusion Detection Technology Based on Large Language Models,

    H. Lai, “Intrusion Detection Technology Based on Large Language Models,” in IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Algorithms and Soft Computing Techniques (EASCT) , 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  89. [97]

    HuntGPT: Integrating Machine Learning- Based Anomaly Detection and Explainable AI with Large Language Models (LLMs),

    T. Ali and P. Kostakos, “HuntGPT: Integrating Machine Learning- Based Anomaly Detection and Explainable AI with Large Language Models (LLMs),” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2309.16021, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  90. [98]

    TNN-IDS: Transformer Neural Network-based Intrusion Detection System for MQTT-enabled IoT Networks,

    S. Ullah, J. Ahmad, M. A. Khan, M. S. Alshehri, W. Boulila, A. Koubaa, S. U. Jan, and M. M. I. Ch, “TNN-IDS: Transformer Neural Network-based Intrusion Detection System for MQTT-enabled IoT Networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 237, p. 110072, 2023

    2023

  91. [99]

    Robust Unsupervised Network Intrusion Detection with Self-supervised Masked Context Reconstruction,

    W. Wang, S. Jian, Y . Tan, Q. Wu, and C. Huang, “Robust Unsupervised Network Intrusion Detection with Self-supervised Masked Context Reconstruction,” Computers & Security , vol. 128, p. 103131, 2023

    2023

  92. [100]

    A Lightweight IoT Intrusion Detection Model based on Improved BERT- of-Theseus,

    Z. Wang, J. Li, S. Yang, X. Luo, D. Li, and S. Mahmoodi, “A Lightweight IoT Intrusion Detection Model based on Improved BERT- of-Theseus,” Expert Systems with Applications , vol. 238, p. 122045, 2024

    2024

  93. [101]

    GPT and Interpolation-based Data Augmentation for Multiclass Intrusion Detection in IIoT,

    F. S. Melícias, T. F. Ribeiro, C. Rabadão, L. Santos, and R. L. d. C. Costa, “GPT and Interpolation-based Data Augmentation for Multiclass Intrusion Detection in IIoT,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  94. [102]

    GPT-2C: A Parser for Honeypot Logs using Large Pre- trained Language Models,

    F. Setianto, E. Tsani, F. Sadiq, G. Domalis, D. Tsakalidis, and P. Kostakos, “GPT-2C: A Parser for Honeypot Logs using Large Pre- trained Language Models,” in IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) , 2021, pp. 649–653

    2021

  95. [103]

    Robust and Transferable Anomaly Detection in Log Data using Pre-Trained Language Models,

    H. Ott, J. Bogatinovski, A. Acker, S. Nedelkoski, and O. Kao, “Robust and Transferable Anomaly Detection in Log Data using Pre-Trained Language Models,” in IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Cloud Intelligence (CloudIntelligence), 2021, pp. 19–24

    2021

  96. [104]

    RAGLog: Log Anomaly Detection using Retrieval Augmented Generation,

    J. Pan, S. L. Wong, and Y . Yuan, “RAGLog: Log Anomaly Detection using Retrieval Augmented Generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05261, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  97. [105]

    LogGPT: Exploring ChatGPT for Log- based Anomaly Detection,

    J. Qi, S. Huang, Z. Luan, S. Yang, C. Fung, H. Yang, D. Qian, J. Shang, Z. Xiao, and Z. Wu, “LogGPT: Exploring ChatGPT for Log- based Anomaly Detection,” in IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing & Communications, Data Science & Systems, Smart City & Depen...

    2023

  98. [106]

    LILAC: Log Parsing using LLMs with Adaptive Parsing Cache,

    Z. Jiang, J. Liu, Z. Chen, Y . Li, J. Huang, Y . Huo, P. He, J. Ge, and M. R. Lyu, “LILAC: Log Parsing using LLMs with Adaptive Parsing Cache,” Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering , vol. 1, pp. 137–160, 2024

    2024

  99. [107]

    Log Anomaly Detection Through GPT-2 for Large Scale Systems,

    Y . Ji, J. Han, Y . Zhao, S. Zhang, and Z. Gong, “Log Anomaly Detection Through GPT-2 for Large Scale Systems,” ZTE Communications , vol. 21, no. 3, p. 70, 2023

    2023

  100. [108]

    An Assessment of ChatGPT on Log Data,

    P. Mudgal and R. Wouhaybi, “An Assessment of ChatGPT on Log Data,” in 1st International Conference on AI-generated Content (AIGC), 2023, pp. 148–169

    2023

  101. [109]

    Design and Development of a Log Management System Based on Cloud Native Architecture,

    Y . Sun, Y . Chen, H. Zhao, and S. Peng, “Design and Development of a Log Management System Based on Cloud Native Architecture,” in 9th IEEE International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI) , 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  102. [110]

    Web Content Filtering through Knowledge Distillation of Large Language Models,

    T. Vörös, S. P. Bergeron, and K. Berlin, “Web Content Filtering through Knowledge Distillation of Large Language Models,” in IEEE International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2023, pp. 357–361

    2023

  103. [111]

    CYGENT: A Cyber- security Conversational Agent with Log Summarization Powered by GPT-3,

    P. Balasubramanian, J. Seby, and P. Kostakos, “CYGENT: A Cyber- security Conversational Agent with Log Summarization Powered by GPT-3,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17160 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Large Language Models and Unsupervised Feature Learning: Implications for Log Analysis,

    E. Karlsen, X. Luo, N. Zincir-Heywood, and M. Heywood, “Large Language Models and Unsupervised Feature Learning: Implications for Log Analysis,” Annals of Telecommunications, pp. 1–19, 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    IoT device labeling using large language models,

    B. Meyuhas, A. Bremler-Barr, and T. Shapira, “IoT device labeling using large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01586, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Dom-BERT: Detecting Malicious Domains with Pre-training Model,

    Y . Tian and Z. Li, “Dom-BERT: Detecting Malicious Domains with Pre-training Model,” in International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement (PAM). Springer, 2024, pp. 133–158

    2024

  107. [115]

    Logfit: Log anomaly detection using fine-tuned language models,

    C. Almodovar, F. Sabrina, S. Karimi, and S. Azad, “Logfit: Log anomaly detection using fine-tuned language models,” IEEE Transac- tions on Network and Service Management , 2024

    2024

  108. [116]

    Observations on LLMs for Telecom Domain: Capabilities and Limitations,

    S. Soman and R. HG, “Observations on LLMs for Telecom Domain: Capabilities and Limitations,” in 3rd ACM International Conference on AI-ML Systems (AIMLSystems) , 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  109. [117]

    Making network configuration human friendly,

    C. Wang, M. Scazzariello, A. Farshin, D. Kostic, and M. Chiesa, “Making network configuration human friendly,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06342, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Enhancing Network Management Using Code Generated by Large Language Models,

    S. K. Mani, Y . Zhou, K. Hsieh, S. Segarra, T. Eberl, E. Azulai, I. Frizler, R. Chandra, and S. Kandula, “Enhancing Network Management Using Code Generated by Large Language Models,” in 22nd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets) , 2023, pp. 196–204

    2023

  111. [119]

    What Do LLMs Need to Synthesize Correct Router Configurations?

    R. Mondal, A. Tang, R. Beckett, T. Millstein, and G. Varghese, “What Do LLMs Need to Synthesize Correct Router Configurations?” in 22nd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets) , 2023, pp. 189– 195

    2023

  112. [120]

    Unlocking Telecom Domain Knowledge Using LLMs,

    S. Roychowdhury, N. Jain, and S. Soman, “Unlocking Telecom Domain Knowledge Using LLMs,” in 16th IEEE International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS) , 2024, pp. 267– 269

    2024

  113. [121]

    Large Language Models Empowered Autonomous Edge AI for Connected Intelligence,

    Y . Shen, J. Shao, X. Zhang, Z. Lin, H. Pan, D. Li, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Large Language Models Empowered Autonomous Edge AI for Connected Intelligence,” IEEE Communications Magazine , 2024

    2024

  114. [122]

    Utilizing Large Language Models to Translate RFC Protocol Specifi- cations to CPSA Definitions,

    M. Duclos, I. A. Fernandez, K. Moore, S. Mittal, and E. Zieglar, “Utilizing Large Language Models to Translate RFC Protocol Specifi- cations to CPSA Definitions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00890, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Linguis- tic Intelligence in Large Language Models for Telecommunications,

    T. Ahmed, N. Piovesan, A. De Domenico, and S. Choudhury, “Linguis- tic Intelligence in Large Language Models for Telecommunications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15818 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Telecom Language Models: Must They Be Large?

    N. Piovesan, A. De Domenico, and F. Ayed, “Telecom Language Models: Must They Be Large?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04666 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Deploying Stateful Network Functions Efficiently using Large Language Models,

    H. Ghasemirahni, A. Farshin, M. Scazzariello, M. Chiesa, and D. Kosti ´c, “Deploying Stateful Network Functions Efficiently using Large Language Models,” in 4th ACM-EUROSYS Workshop on Ma- chine Learning and Systems (EuroMLSys) , 2024, pp. 28–38

    2024

  118. [126]

    Leveraging Fine-Tuned Retrieval-Augmented Gener- ation with Long-Context Support: For 3GPP Standards,

    O. Erak, N. Alabbasi, O. Alhussein, I. Lotfi, A. Hussein, S. Muhaidat, and M. Debbah, “Leveraging Fine-Tuned Retrieval-Augmented Gener- ation with Long-Context Support: For 3GPP Standards,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11775, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Hermes: A large language model framework on the journey to autonomous networks,

    F. Ayed, A. Maatouk, N. Piovesan, A. De Domenico, M. Debbah, and Z.-Q. Luo, “Hermes: A large language model framework on the journey to autonomous networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06490 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    ECU-IoHT: A Dataset for Analyzing Cyberattacks in In- ternet of Health Things,

    M. Ahmed, S. Byreddy, A. Nutakki, L. F. Sikos, and P. Haskell- Dowland, “ECU-IoHT: A Dataset for Analyzing Cyberattacks in In- ternet of Health Things,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 122, p. 102621, 2021

    2021

  121. [129]

    LLM Maybe LongLM: Self-Extend LLM Context Window Without Tuning,

    H. Jin, X. Han, J. Yang, Z. Jiang, Z. Liu, C.-Y . Chang, H. Chen, and X. Hu, “LLM Maybe LongLM: Self-Extend LLM Context Window Without Tuning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01325 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  122. [130]

    XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding,

    Z. Yang, Z. Dai, Y . Yang, J. Carbonell, R. R. Salakhutdinov, and Q. V . IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOL. XX, NO. X, XXXX 2025 31 Le, “XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding,” Advances in Neural Information Processing ...

    2025

  123. [131]

    A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,

    Y . Yao, J. Duan, K. Xu, Y . Cai, Z. Sun, and Y . Zhang, “A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” High-Confidence Computing, p. 100211, 2024

    2024

  124. [132]

    A Detailed Analysis of the KDD CUP 99 Data Set,

    M. Tavallaee, E. Bagheri, W. Lu, and A. A. Ghorbani, “A Detailed Analysis of the KDD CUP 99 Data Set,” in IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications (CISDA), 2009, pp. 1–6

    2009

  125. [133]

    Web Analyzing Traffic Challenge: Description and Results,

    C. Raıssi, J. Brissaud, G. Dray, P. Poncelet, M. Roche, and M. Teisseire, “Web Analyzing Traffic Challenge: Description and Results,” in Euro- pean Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML/PKDD) , 2007, pp. 47–52

    2007

  126. [134]

    CSIC 2010 Web Application Attacks

    “CSIC 2010 Web Application Attacks.” [Online]. Available: https:// www.kaggle.com/datasets/ispangler/csic-2010-web-application-attacks

    2010

  127. [135]

    HttpParamsDataset

    “HttpParamsDataset.” [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/ datasets/evg3n1j/httpparamsdataset

  128. [136]

    UNSW-NB15: A Comprehensive Data Set for Network Intrusion Detection Systems (UNSW-NB15 Network Data Set),

    N. Moustafa and J. Slay, “UNSW-NB15: A Comprehensive Data Set for Network Intrusion Detection Systems (UNSW-NB15 Network Data Set),” in IEEE Military Communications and Information Systems Conference (MilCIS), 2015, pp. 1–6

    2015

  129. [137]

    IoT SENTINEL: Automated Device-Type Identification for Security Enforcement in IoT,

    M. Miettinen, S. Marchal, I. Hafeez, N. Asokan, A.-R. Sadeghi, and S. Tarkoma, “IoT SENTINEL: Automated Device-Type Identification for Security Enforcement in IoT,” in IEEE 37th International Con- ference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) , 2017, pp. 2177– 2184

    2017

  130. [138]

    Characterization of Encrypted and VPN Traffic using Time-related Features,

    G. Draper-Gil, A. H. Lashkari, M. S. I. Mamun, and A. A. Ghorbani, “Characterization of Encrypted and VPN Traffic using Time-related Features,” in International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP) , 2016, pp. 407–414

    2016

  131. [139]

    Characterization of Tor Traffic using Time based Features,

    A. H. Lashkari, G. D. Gil, M. S. I. Mamun, and A. A. Ghorbani, “Characterization of Tor Traffic using Time based Features,” in In- ternational Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP), vol. 2, 2017, pp. 253–262

    2017

  132. [140]

    Classifying IoT Devices in Smart Environments Using Network Traffic Characteristics,

    A. Sivanathan, H. H. Gharakheili, F. Loi, A. Radford, C. Wijenayake, A. Vishwanath, and V . Sivaraman, “Classifying IoT Devices in Smart Environments Using Network Traffic Characteristics,” IEEE Transac- tions on Mobile Computing , vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1745–1759, 2018

    2018

  133. [141]

    USTC-TFC2016

    “USTC-TFC2016.” [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/ datasets/randasrour/ustctfc2016

  134. [142]

    Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization,

    I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, A. A. Ghorbani et al. , “Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization,” ICISSp, vol. 1, pp. 108–116, 2018

    2018

  135. [143]

    Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep Learning,

    P. Sirinam, M. Imani, M. Juarez, and M. Wright, “Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep Learning,” in ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 2018, pp. 1928–1943

    2018

  136. [144]

    LabeledFlows2017 Dataset,

    “LabeledFlows2017 Dataset,” https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jsrojas/ ip-network-traffic-flows-labeled-with-87-apps

  137. [145]

    FlowPrint: Semi-Supervised Mobile-App Fingerprinting on Encrypted Network Traffic,

    T. Van Ede, R. Bortolameotti, A. Continella, J. Ren, D. J. Dubois, M. Lindorfer, D. Choffnes, M. Van Steen, and A. Peter, “FlowPrint: Semi-Supervised Mobile-App Fingerprinting on Encrypted Network Traffic,” in Network and Distributed System Security symposium (NDSS), vol. 27, 2020

    2020

  138. [146]

    NL2Bash: A Corpus and Semantic Parser for Natural Language Interface to the Linux Operating System,

    X. V . Lin, C. Wang, L. Zettlemoyer, and M. D. Ernst, “NL2Bash: A Corpus and Semantic Parser for Natural Language Interface to the Linux Operating System,” in Language Resource and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 2018

    2018

  139. [147]

    Developing Realistic Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack Dataset and Taxonomy,

    I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, S. Hakak, and A. A. Ghorbani, “Developing Realistic Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack Dataset and Taxonomy,” in IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST) , 2019, pp. 1–8

    2019

  140. [148]

    IoTFinder: Efficient Large-Scale Identification of IoT Devices via Passive DNS Traffic Analysis,

    R. Perdisci, T. Papastergiou, O. Alrawi, and M. Antonakakis, “IoTFinder: Efficient Large-Scale Identification of IoT Devices via Passive DNS Traffic Analysis,” in IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) , 2020, pp. 474–489

    2020

  141. [149]

    Online Shopping Store - Web Server Logs,

    F. Zaker, “Online Shopping Store - Web Server Logs,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/eliasdabbas/web- server-access-logs

    2019

  142. [150]

    LabeledFlows2019 Dataset,

    “LabeledFlows2019 Dataset,” https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jsrojas/ labeled-network-traffic-flows-114-applications

  143. [151]

    Apache Web Server - Access Log Pre-processing for Web Intrusion Detection,

    M. A. A. Hilmi, K. A. Cahyanto, and M. Mustamiin, “Apache Web Server - Access Log Pre-processing for Web Intrusion Detection,”

  144. [152]

    De- tection of DoH Tunnels using Time-series Classification of Encrypted Traffic,

    M. MontazeriShatoori, L. Davidson, G. Kaur, and A. H. Lashkari, “De- tection of DoH Tunnels using Time-series Classification of Encrypted Traffic,” inIEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Com- puting, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on...

    2020

  145. [153]

    CyberLab Honeynet Dataset,

    U. Sedlar, M. Kren, L. Štefani ˇc Južni ˇc, and M. V olk, “CyberLab Honeynet Dataset,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.3687527

    2020

  146. [154]

    Loghub: A Large Collection of System Log Datasets for AI-driven Log Analytics,

    J. Zhu, S. He, P. He, J. Liu, and M. R. Lyu, “Loghub: A Large Collection of System Log Datasets for AI-driven Log Analytics,” in IEEE 34th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineer- ing (ISSRE), 2023, pp. 355–366

    2023

  147. [155]

    One MUD to Rule Them All: IoT Location Impact,

    A. Bremler-Barr, B. Meyuhas, and R. Shister, “One MUD to Rule Them All: IoT Location Impact,” in IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) , 2022, pp. 1–5

    2022

  148. [156]

    Machine Learning based IoT Intrusion Detection Sys- tem: An MQTT Case Study (MQTT-IoT-IDS2020 Dataset),

    H. Hindy, E. Bayne, M. Bures, R. Atkinson, C. Tachtatzis, and X. Bellekens, “Machine Learning based IoT Intrusion Detection Sys- tem: An MQTT Case Study (MQTT-IoT-IDS2020 Dataset),” in Inter- national Networking Conference . Springer, 2020, pp. 73–84

    2020

  149. [157]

    A New Distributed Architecture for Evaluating AI- based Security Systems at the Edge: Network TON_IoT Datasets,

    N. Moustafa, “A New Distributed Architecture for Evaluating AI- based Security Systems at the Edge: Network TON_IoT Datasets,” Sustainable Cities and Society , vol. 72, p. 102994, 2021

    2021

  150. [158]

    fwaf-dataset

    “fwaf-dataset.” [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ evg3n1j/fwaf-dataset

  151. [159]

    Dataset of EU SPIRIT Project,

    E. S. Consortium, “Dataset of EU SPIRIT Project,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4767861

    2021 doi

  152. [160]

    Towards the Development of a Realistic Multidimensional IoT Profiling Dataset,

    S. Dadkhah, H. Mahdikhani, P. K. Danso, A. Zohourian, K. A. Truong, and A. A. Ghorbani, “Towards the Development of a Realistic Multidimensional IoT Profiling Dataset,” in 19th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security & Trust (PST) , 2022, pp. 1–11

    2022

  153. [161]

    Edge-IIoTset: A New Comprehensive Realistic Cyber Security Dataset of IoT and IIoT Applications for Centralized and Federated Learning,

    M. A. Ferrag, O. Friha, D. Hamouda, L. Maglaras, and H. Janicke, “Edge-IIoTset: A New Comprehensive Realistic Cyber Security Dataset of IoT and IIoT Applications for Centralized and Federated Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 40 281–40 306, 2022

    2022

  154. [162]

    CICIoT2023: A Real-Time Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Attacks in IoT Environment,

    E. C. P. Neto, S. Dadkhah, R. Ferreira, A. Zohourian, R. Lu, and A. A. Ghorbani, “CICIoT2023: A Real-Time Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Attacks in IoT Environment,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 13, p. 5941, 2023

    2023

  155. [163]

    SPEC5G: A Dataset for 5G Cellular Network Protocol Analysis,

    I. Karim, K. S. Mubasshir, M. M. Rahman, and E. Bertino, “SPEC5G: A Dataset for 5G Cellular Network Protocol Analysis,” in 13th In- ternational Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computation...

    2023

  156. [164]

    TeleQnA: A Benchmark Dataset to Assess Large Language Models Telecommunications Knowledge,

    A. Maatouk, F. Ayed, N. Piovesan, A. De Domenico, M. Debbah, and Z.-Q. Luo, “TeleQnA: A Benchmark Dataset to Assess Large Language Models Telecommunications Knowledge,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15051, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  157. [165]

    A Search Engine Backed by Internet-Wide Scanning,

    Z. Durumeric, D. Adrian, A. Mirian, M. Bailey, and J. A. Halderman, “A Search Engine Backed by Internet-Wide Scanning,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communica- tions Security (CCS) , 2015, pp. 542–553

    2015

  158. [166]

    Zoonet: a Proactive Telemetry System for Large-Scale Cloud Networks,

    S. Zhu, J. Lu, B. Lyu, T. Pan, C. Jia, X. Cheng, D. Kang, Y . Lv, F. Yang, X. Xue et al. , “Zoonet: a Proactive Telemetry System for Large-Scale Cloud Networks,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies , 2022, pp. 321–336

    2022

  159. [167]

    Network Telemetry: Towards a Top-Down Approach,

    M. Yu, “Network Telemetry: Towards a Top-Down Approach,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review , vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 11– 17, 2019

    2019

  160. [168]

    A Survey on Big Data for Network Traffic Monitoring and Analysis,

    A. D’Alconzo, I. Drago, A. Morichetta, M. Mellia, and P. Casas, “A Survey on Big Data for Network Traffic Monitoring and Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 800–813, 2019

    2019

  161. [169]

    NetBench: A Large-Scale and Comprehensive Network Traffic Benchmark Dataset for Foundation Models,

    C. Qian, X. Li, Q. Wang, G. Zhou, and H. Shao, “NetBench: A Large-Scale and Comprehensive Network Traffic Benchmark Dataset for Foundation Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10319 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  162. [170]

    AI/ML for network security: The emperor has no clothes,

    A. S. Jacobs, R. Beltiukov, W. Willinger, R. A. Ferreira, A. Gupta, and L. Z. Granville, “AI/ML for network security: The emperor has no clothes,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2022, pp. 1537–1551

    2022

  163. [171]

    Troubleshooting an Intrusion Detection Dataset: the CICIDS2017 Case Study,

    G. Engelen, V . Rimmer, and W. Joosen, “Troubleshooting an Intrusion Detection Dataset: the CICIDS2017 Case Study,” in IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 2021, pp. 7–12

    2021

  164. [172]

    A Survey on Federated Learning,

    C. Zhang, Y . Xie, H. Bai, B. Yu, W. Li, and Y . Gao, “A Survey on Federated Learning,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 216, p. 106775, 2021

    2021

  165. [173]

    A Review of Applications in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOL. XX, NO. X, XXXX 2025 32 Federated Learning,

    L. Li, Y . Fan, M. Tse, and K.-Y . Lin, “A Review of Applications in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOL. XX, NO. X, XXXX 2025 32 Federated Learning,” Computers & Industrial Engineering , vol. 149, p. 106854, 2020

    2025

  166. [174]

    Federated Learning-Empowered AI-Generated Content in Wireless Networks,

    X. Huang, P. Li, H. Du, J. Kang, D. Niyato, D. I. Kim, and Y . Wu, “Federated Learning-Empowered AI-Generated Content in Wireless Networks,” IEEE Network, 2024

    2024

  167. [175]

    Green AI,

    R. Schwartz, J. Dodge, N. A. Smith, and O. Etzioni, “Green AI,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 54–63, 2020

    2020

  168. [176]

    A Review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and Prospects,

    P. P. Ray, “A Review on TinyML: State-of-the-art and Prospects,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1595–1623, 2022

    2022

  169. [177]

    TinyML Meets IoT: A Comprehensive Survey,

    L. Dutta and S. Bharali, “TinyML Meets IoT: A Comprehensive Survey,” Internet of Things , vol. 16, p. 100461, 2021

    2021

  170. [178]

    Quantum Machine Learning: A Classi- cal Perspective,

    C. Ciliberto, M. Herbster, A. D. Ialongo, M. Pontil, A. Rocchetto, S. Severini, and L. Wossnig, “Quantum Machine Learning: A Classi- cal Perspective,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , vol. 474, no. 2209, p. 20170551, 2018

    2018

  171. [179]

    Machine Learning & Artificial Intelli- gence in the Quantum Domain: A Review of Recent Progress,

    V . Dunjko and H. J. Briegel, “Machine Learning & Artificial Intelli- gence in the Quantum Domain: A Review of Recent Progress,” Reports on Progress in Physics , vol. 81, no. 7, p. 074001, 2018

    2018

  172. [180]

    Beyond deep reinforcement learning: A tutorial on generative diffusion models in network optimization,

    H. Du, R. Zhang, Y . Liu, J. Wang, Y . Lin, Z. Li, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Cui et al., “Beyond deep reinforcement learning: A tutorial on generative diffusion models in network optimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05384, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Enhancing deep reinforcement learning: A tutorial on generative diffusion models in network optimization,

    ——, “Enhancing deep reinforcement learning: A tutorial on generative diffusion models in network optimization,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2024

    2024

  174. [182]

    Explainable AI: A Brief Survey on History, Research Areas, Approaches and Challenges,

    F. Xu, H. Uszkoreit, Y . Du, W. Fan, D. Zhao, and J. Zhu, “Explainable AI: A Brief Survey on History, Research Areas, Approaches and Challenges,” in Natural language processing and Chinese computing: 8th cCF international conference . Springer, 2019, pp. 563–574

    2019

  175. [183]

    Explainable AI (XAI): Core Ideas, Techniques, and Solutions,

    R. Dwivedi, D. Dave, H. Naik, S. Singhal, R. Omer, P. Patel, B. Qian, Z. Wen, T. Shah, G. Morgan et al., “Explainable AI (XAI): Core Ideas, Techniques, and Solutions,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–33, 2023

    2023

  176. [184]

    A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Internet Traffic Classification and Prediction, and Intrusion Detection,

    A. Nascita, G. Aceto, D. Ciuonzo, A. Montieri, V . Persico, and A. Pescapé, “A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Internet Traffic Classification and Prediction, and Intrusion Detection,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2024

    2024

  177. [185]

    Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problems,

    J. Kaddour, A. Lynch, Q. Liu, M. J. Kusner, and R. Silva, “Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.15475, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence,

    M. K. Sarker, L. Zhou, A. Eberhart, and P. Hitzler, “Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence,” AI Communications , vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 197– 209, 2021

    2021

  179. [187]

    Hitzler and M

    P. Hitzler and M. K. Sarker, Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: The State of the Art . IOS press, 2022

    2022

  180. [188]

    Blockchain Challenges and Opportunities: A Survey,

    Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H.-N. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, “Blockchain Challenges and Opportunities: A Survey,” International Journal of Web and Grid Services , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 352–375, 2018

    2018

  181. [189]

    Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications,

    M. Pilkington, “Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications,” in Research handbook on digital transformations . Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016, pp. 225–253. Giampaolo Bovenzi is an Assistant Professor at DIETI of the University of Napoli Federico II, since October 2023. ...

    2016

  182. [2020]

    Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2022924107

    [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2022924107

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.