REVIEW 2 cited by
Text2World: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Symbolic World Model Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, there has been growing interest in leveraging large language models (LLMs) to generate symbolic world models from textual descriptions. Although LLMs have been extensively explored in the context of world modeling, prior studies encountered several challenges, including evaluation randomness, dependence on indirect metrics, and a limited domain scope. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel benchmark, Text2World, based on planning domain definition language (PDDL), featuring hundreds of diverse domains and employing multi-criteria, execution-based metrics for a more robust evaluation. We benchmark current LLMs using Text2World and find that reasoning models trained with large-scale reinforcement learning outperform others. However, even the best-performing model still demonstrates limited capabilities in world modeling. Building on these insights, we examine several promising strategies to enhance the world modeling capabilities of LLMs, including test-time scaling, agent training, and more. We hope that Text2World can serve as a crucial resource, laying the groundwork for future research in leveraging LLMs as world models. The project page is available at https://text-to-world.github.io/.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
3D and 4D World Modeling: A Survey
A survey that defines 3D/4D world modeling, organizes methods into VideoGen, OccGen, and LiDARGen categories, and compiles datasets, metrics, and benchmark numbers.
-
Make Planning Research Rigorous Again!
A position paper calling for LLM-based planning research to reuse the rigor, benchmarks, and tools of the classical automated planning community.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.