Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model Confidence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13943 v2 pith:IT7Y52YP submitted 2025-02-19 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords reasoningmethodmodelprmsstepadaptivestepapproachesconfidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current approaches for training Process Reward Models (PRMs) often involve breaking down responses into multiple reasoning steps using rule-based techniques, such as using predefined placeholder tokens or setting the reasoning step's length into a fixed size. These approaches overlook the fact that specific words do not typically mark true decision points in a text. To address this, we propose AdaptiveStep, a method that divides reasoning steps based on the model's confidence in predicting the next word. This division method provides more decision-making information at each step, enhancing downstream tasks, such as reward model learning. Moreover, our method does not require manual annotation. We demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments with AdaptiveStep-trained PRMs in mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks. Experimental results indicate that the outcome PRM achieves state-of-the-art Best-of-N performance, surpassing greedy search strategy with token-level value-guided decoding, while also reducing construction costs by over 30% compared to existing open-source PRMs. In addition, we provide a thorough analysis and case study on the PRM's performance, transferability, and generalization capabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AdapThink: Adaptive Thinking Preferences for Reasoning Language Model

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AdapThink is an RL post-training framework that adaptively reduces overthinking and underthinking in reasoning language models by rewarding confidence-appropriate reasoning depth and diverse training samples.

  2. Reward-Driven Interaction: Enhancing Proactive Dialogue Agents through User Satisfaction Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-task user satisfaction model with SimCSE-style contrastive learning and domain-intent classification shows small gains on DuerOS, but test-set threshold tuning and input-label leakage weaken the evidence.

Pith tools