Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

REALM-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Agent Systems on Real-world, Dynamic Planning and Scheduling Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.18836 v2 pith:GB3LHC6S submitted 2025-02-26 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords planningbenchmarkmulti-agentevaluationincludingreal-worldschedulingsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This benchmark suite provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing both individual LLMs and multi-agent systems in Real-world planning and scheduling scenarios. The suite encompasses 14 designed planning and scheduling problems that progress from basic to highly complex, incorporating key aspects such as multi-agent coordination, inter-agent dependencies, and dynamic environmental disruptions. Each problem can be scaled along three dimensions: the number of parallel planning threads, the complexity of inter-dependencies, and the frequency of unexpected disruptions requiring Real-time adaptation. The benchmark includes 14 detailed problem specifications, 15 comparison methods including Random, LPT, SPT, STPT, MPSR, DRL-Liu, GP, GEP, LSO, SPT/TWKR, DRL-Chen, DRL-Zhang, 2+ evaluation metrics, and baseline implementations using 3+ LLMs including GPT-4o, Claude-3.7, DeepSeek-R1, and 4 contemporary frameworks including LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, and Swarm, enabling rigorous testing of both single-agent and multi-agent planning capabilities. Through standardized evaluation criteria and scalable complexity, this benchmark aims to be opened to public, and drive progress in developing more adaptable, robust, and scalable AI planning systems for Real-world applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MCPEval: Automatic MCP-based Deep Evaluation for AI Agent Models

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MCPEval is an automated MCP-based framework that generates, verifies, and scores LLM agent tool-use tasks; its experiments reveal a consistent gap between how well agents execute tool calls and how well they synthesiz...

  2. Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that groups graph-empowered AI agent research into planning, execution, memory, and multi-agent coordination, plus agents-for-graphs and applications.

  3. AGI Requires a Coordination Layer on Top of Pattern Repositories

    cs.AI 2025-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims AGI requires a System-2 coordination layer on top of LLM pattern repositories, formalized by an anchoring score S = ρd − dr − γ log k.

  4. Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.

Pith tools