REVIEW 1 cited by
Investigating the Relationship Between Debiasing and Artifact Removal using Saliency Maps
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The widespread adoption of machine learning systems has raised critical concerns about fairness and bias, making mitigating harmful biases essential for AI development. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between debiasing and removing artifacts in neural networks for computer vision tasks. First, we introduce a set of novel XAI-based metrics that analyze saliency maps to assess shifts in a model's decision-making process. Then, we demonstrate that successful debiasing methods systematically redirect model focus away from protected attributes. Finally, we show that techniques originally developed for artifact removal can be effectively repurposed for improving fairness. These findings provide evidence for the existence of a bidirectional connection between ensuring fairness and removing artifacts corresponding to protected attributes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data
A position paper reviewing why evaluating AI explanations is difficult, illustrated by the author's bias-detection and human-survey case studies and by concept-drift explanation methods.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.