Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 cited by

Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06034 v1 pith:WBRFFGSC submitted 2025-03-08 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords rank-r1reasoningfine-tuningdatasetsllm-basedmethodsrankingrelevance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce Rank-R1, a novel LLM-based reranker that performs reasoning over both the user query and candidate documents before performing the ranking task. Existing document reranking methods based on large language models (LLMs) typically rely on prompting or fine-tuning LLMs to order or label candidate documents according to their relevance to a query. For Rank-R1, we use a reinforcement learning algorithm along with only a small set of relevance labels (without any reasoning supervision) to enhance the reasoning ability of LLM-based rerankers. Our hypothesis is that adding reasoning capabilities to the rerankers can improve their relevance assessement and ranking capabilities. Our experiments on the TREC DL and BRIGHT datasets show that Rank-R1 is highly effective, especially for complex queries. In particular, we find that Rank-R1 achieves effectiveness on in-domain datasets at par with that of supervised fine-tuning methods, but utilizing only 18\% of the training data used by the fine-tuning methods. We also find that the model largely outperforms zero-shot and supervised fine-tuning when applied to out-of-domain datasets featuring complex queries, especially when a 14B-size model is used. Finally, we qualitatively observe that Rank-R1's reasoning process improves the explainability of the ranking results, opening new opportunities for search engine results presentation and fruition.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structure-aware Relative Policy Optimization for Ranking

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dividing pairwise reward differences by top-weighted Kendall-tau distance in group-relative policy optimization improves listwise ranking performance.

  2. TabRank: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Table Re-Rankers

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Conditioning a table reranker on teacher chain-of-thought traces during training, without supervising generation of the traces, improves out-of-distribution table retrieval accuracy over base, naive SFT, and standard ...

  3. Tool-Adaptive LLM Reranker

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pointwise LLM reranking cast as an agentic MDP with language-preserving warm-up and asymmetric cost-aware RL yields adaptive tool use, SOTA NDCG, and high throughput.

  4. MemSifter: Offloading LLM Memory Retrieval via Outcome-Driven Proxy Reasoning

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MemSifter trains a 4B proxy with an outcome-driven, rank-sensitive RL reward to sift LLM memory, and on eight benchmarks it matches or beats embedding, graph, and long-context baselines.

  5. Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CRUMB is a new benchmark for complex, multi-aspect retrieval tasks on which state-of-the-art retrieval models score poorly, and query rewriting does not rescue the best models.

  6. ERank: Fusing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning for Effective and Efficient Text Reranking

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ERank trains a pointwise reasoning-LLM reranker with fine-grained integer scoring and a listwise reinforcement-learning reward, reporting nDCG@10 of 40.2 on BRIGHT for its 32B variant with BM25 hybrid scoring.

  7. MM-R5: MultiModal Reasoning-Enhanced ReRanker via Reinforcement Learning for Document Retrieval

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MM-R5, a 7B multimodal re-ranker trained with SFT and GRPO, achieves state-of-the-art page-level recall on MMDocIR by generating per-page reasoning chains.

  8. Training LLMs for EHR-Based Reasoning Tasks via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 3B model trained with a small SFT warm-up followed by verifiable-reward RL matches or exceeds far larger models on EHR-based medical calculation, trial matching, and diagnosis tasks.

  9. From Token to Action: State Machine Reasoning to Mitigate Overthinking in Information Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A state-machine framework that replaces token-level chain-of-thought with discrete query-refinement and reranking actions reduces token use by 74% while improving nDCG@10 on retrieval benchmarks.

  10. Don't "Overthink" Passage Reranking: Is Reasoning Truly Necessary?

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Standard pointwise rerankers beat reasoning-based pointwise rerankers under identical training, and removing the reasoning process at inference partially recovers the gap.

  11. Rank-K: Test-Time Reasoning for Listwise Reranking

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rank-K, a reasoning-model-based listwise reranker distilled from DeepSeek R1 traces, beats RankZephyr on several benchmarks but only marginally on TREC DL 2019/2020.

  12. CORE: A Unified Cascaded Ordinal Relevance Estimation Framework for E-commerce Search

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Cascaded binary relevance decisions with step-level GRPO and PostCoT distillation improve offline accuracy and cut online bad-case rate by 15.94% versus flat multi-class baselines.

  13. REARANK: Reasoning Re-ranking Agent via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Training a listwise reranker with reinforcement learning and explicit reasoning on only 179 annotated queries yields reranking quality comparable to GPT-4.

  14. RAGtifier: Evaluating RAG Generation Approaches of State-of-the-Art RAG Systems for the SIGIR LiveRAG Competition

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A RAG pipeline using InstructRAG, Pinecone, and BGE placed third in the 2025 LiveRAG Challenge, though internal evaluation only weakly predicted official scores.

Pith tools