REVIEW 4 cited by
Towards Interpretable Protein Structure Prediction with Sparse Autoencoders
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Protein language models have revolutionized structure prediction, but their nonlinear nature obscures how sequence representations inform structure prediction. While sparse autoencoders (SAEs) offer a path to interpretability here by learning linear representations in high-dimensional space, their application has been limited to smaller protein language models unable to perform structure prediction. In this work, we make two key advances: (1) we scale SAEs to ESM2-3B, the base model for ESMFold, enabling mechanistic interpretability of protein structure prediction for the first time, and (2) we adapt Matryoshka SAEs for protein language models, which learn hierarchically organized features by forcing nested groups of latents to reconstruct inputs independently. We demonstrate that our Matryoshka SAEs achieve comparable or better performance than standard architectures. Through comprehensive evaluations, we show that SAEs trained on ESM2-3B significantly outperform those trained on smaller models for both biological concept discovery and contact map prediction. Finally, we present an initial case study demonstrating how our approach enables targeted steering of ESMFold predictions, increasing structure solvent accessibility while fixing the input sequence. To facilitate further investigation by the broader community, we open-source our code, dataset, pretrained models https://github.com/johnyang101/reticular-sae , and visualizer https://sae.reticular.ai .
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Induction Meets Biology: Mechanisms of Repeat Detection in Protein Language Models
Protein language models complete repeats by combining induction heads that copy the aligned residue from the other repeat copy with neurons encoding amino-acid similarity; the approximate-repeat circuit contains and g...
-
Two Stages of Folding: Convergent Mechanisms in AI Protein Folding Trunks
Causal interventions show ESMFold's folding trunk first transfers sequence chemistry into its pairwise representation (blocks 0–7), then builds pairwise spatial features that control output geometry (blocks 25+).
-
Design-CP: Context Parallelism for Design of Protein Nanoparticles
Context-parallel inference for RFdiffusion 3 enables end-to-end all-atom design of large symmetric protein nanoparticles on multi-GPU hardware without retraining.
-
Mechanistic Interpretability of Antibody Language Models Using SAEs
TopK SAEs uncover biologically meaningful latent features in antibody language models without guaranteeing causal steering, whereas Ordered SAEs provide reliable generative control at the cost of complex activation patterns.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.