Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MinorBench: A hand-built benchmark for content-based risks for children

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.10242 v1 pith:NHXZTC5B submitted 2025-03-13 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords childrenllmsrisksbenchmarkcontent-basedevaluateminorbenchminors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly entering children's lives - through parent-driven adoption, schools, and peer networks - yet current AI ethics and safety research do not adequately address content-related risks specific to minors. In this paper, we highlight these gaps with a real-world case study of an LLM-based chatbot deployed in a middle school setting, revealing how students used and sometimes misused the system. Building on these findings, we propose a new taxonomy of content-based risks for minors and introduce MinorBench, an open-source benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on their ability to refuse unsafe or inappropriate queries from children. We evaluate six prominent LLMs under different system prompts, demonstrating substantial variability in their child-safety compliance. Our results inform practical steps for more robust, child-focused safety mechanisms and underscore the urgency of tailoring AI systems to safeguard young users.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EduZone: A Framework for Evaluating LLM Safety for K-12 Students and Teachers

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EduZone is a new evaluation framework and 5.2K-prompt dataset showing that LLMs are substantially more vulnerable to education-specific risks and adaptive multi-turn attacks than to conventional safety risks.

  2. Benchmarking the Pedagogical Knowledge of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors release an open benchmark of 1,143 pedagogical knowledge questions from Chilean teacher exams and report accuracy, cost, and size trade-offs for 97 large language models.

Pith tools