REVIEW 5 cited by
Parameters vs. Context: Fine-Grained Control of Knowledge Reliance in Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge. However, conflicts between parametric knowledge and retrieved context pose challenges, particularly when retrieved information is unreliable or the model's internal knowledge is outdated. In such cases, LLMs struggle to determine whether to rely more on their own parameters or the conflicted context. To address this, we propose **CK-PLUG**, a plug-and-play method for controlling LLMs' reliance on parametric and contextual knowledge. We introduce a novel knowledge consistency metric, Confidence Gain, which detects knowledge conflicts by measuring entropy shifts in token probability distributions after context insertion. CK-PLUG then enables fine-grained control over knowledge preference by adjusting the probability distribution of tokens with negative confidence gain through a single tuning parameter. Experiments demonstrate CK-PLUG's ability to significantly regulate knowledge reliance in counterfactual RAG scenarios while maintaining generation fluency and knowledge accuracy. For instance, on Llama3-8B, memory recall (MR) of RAG response can be adjusted within a broad range (9.9%-71.9%), compared to the baseline of 42.1%. Moreover, CK-PLUG supports adaptive control based on the model's confidence in both internal and external knowledge, achieving consistent performance improvements across various general RAG tasks. Our code is available at: $\href{https://github.com/byronBBL/CK-PLUG}{\text{this https URL}}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
PURPOSE: Poisoning Conflict Resolution in RAG via Proxy-Fact-Grounded Updates
A black-box poisoning attack that frames false information as a fact-compatible update defeats conflict-resolution safeguards in RAG on most tested settings.
-
On Improving Faithfulness of Podcasts from Documents
AI-generated podcasts often add unsupported claims; a turn-level detector plus rewrite pass improves measured faithfulness across five models and in- and out-of-domain documents.
-
CRiT-QA: Evaluating Multi-hop Reasoning with Counterfactual Chains and Distractor Traps
CRiT-QA forces multi-hop QA models to follow counterfactual evidence chains while rejecting type-consistent distractors, revealing large performance collapses relative to standard benchmarks.
-
"Lost-in-the-Later": Framework for Quantifying Contextual Grounding in Large Language Models
LLMs ground answers in early context far more than later context, and chain-of-thought prompting or reasoning models reduce contextual grounding rather than improving it.
-
RefineX: Learning to Refine Pre-training Data at Scale from Expert-Guided Programs
A deletion-only program refiner, trained on expert end-to-end edits converted via minimum edit distance, improves LLM pretraining data and downstream accuracy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.