REVIEW 2 cited by
History-Independent Concurrent Hash Tables
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
A history-independent data structure does not reveal the history of operations applied to it, only its current logical state, even if its internal state is examined. This paper studies history-independent concurrent dictionaries, in particular, hash tables, and establishes inherent bounds on their space requirements. This paper shows that there is a lock-free history-independent concurrent hash table, in which each memory cell stores two elements and two bits, based on Robin Hood hashing. Our implementation is linearizable, and uses the shared memory primitive LL/SC. The expected amortized step complexity of the hash table is $O(c)$, where $c$ is an upper bound on the number of concurrent operations that access the same element, assuming the hash table is not overpopulated. We complement this positive result by showing that even if we have only two concurrent processes, no history-independent concurrent dictionary that supports sets of any size, with wait-free membership queries and obstruction-free insertions and deletions, can store only two elements of the set and a constant number of bits in each memory cell. This holds even if the step complexity of operations on the dictionary is unbounded.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quadratic Probing Revisited: Smoothed Analysis and the Fall of Robin Hood
In smoothed quadratic probing, anti-Robin Hood ordering achieves O(log ε^{-1}) expected query time while Robin Hood ordering degrades to Θ(ε^{-1/2}); almost all random fixed-offset degree-2 probing schemes are optimal...
-
Succinct and Fast Tiny Pointer Hash Tables
Two practical hash-table designs—Chained-TPHT and Flattened-TPHT—use byte-sized pointers and key quotienting to reach 105.4% and 83.4% space efficiency with constant-time operations and high throughput.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.