REVIEW 2 cited by
Navi-plus: Managing Ambiguous GUI Navigation Tasks with Follow-up Questions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Graphical user interfaces (GUI) automation agents are emerging as powerful tools, enabling humans to accomplish increasingly complex tasks on smart devices. However, users often inadvertently omit key information when conveying tasks, which hinders agent performance in the current agent paradigm that does not support immediate user intervention. To address this issue, we introduce a $\textbf{Self-Correction GUI Navigation}$ task that incorporates interactive information completion capabilities within GUI agents. We developed the $\textbf{Navi-plus}$ dataset with GUI follow-up question-answer pairs, alongside a $\textbf{Dual-Stream Trajectory Evaluation}$ method to benchmark this new capability. Our results show that agents equipped with the ability to ask GUI follow-up questions can fully recover their performance when faced with ambiguous user tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Software Engineering for and with GUI Agent
A survey of 336 GUI-agent papers finds rapid growth alongside weak engineering support for recovery, human oversight, maintainability, and privacy, and calls for lifecycle-centered testing and governance.
-
Plover: Steering GUI Agents through Plan-Centric Interaction
An expert repairing visible plans rescued 23 of 26 failed GUI automation runs, turning 17 into full and 6 into partial successes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.