Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Control Barrier Functions via Minkowski Operations for Safe Navigation among Polytopic Sets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00364 v3 pith:VEAUH333 submitted 2025-04-01 cs.RO math.OC

Control Barrier Functions via Minkowski Operations for Safe Navigation among Polytopic Sets

classification cs.RO math.OC
keywords controlpolytopicdistancefunctionsobstaclessafesetsbarrier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Safely navigating around obstacles while respecting the dynamics, control, and geometry of the underlying system is a key challenge in robotics. Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) generate safe control policies by considering system dynamics and geometry when calculating safe forward-invariant sets. Existing CBF-based methods often rely on conservative shape approximations, like spheres or ellipsoids, which have explicit and differentiable distance functions. In this paper, we propose an optimization-defined CBF that directly considers the exact Signed Distance Function (SDF) between a polytopic robot and polytopic obstacles. Inspired by the Gilbert-Johnson-Keerthi (GJK) algorithm, we formulate both (i) minimum distance and (ii) penetration depth between polytopic sets as convex optimization problems in the space of Minkowski difference operations (the MD-space). Convenient geometric properties of the MD-space enable the derivatives of implicit SDF between two polytopes to be computed via differentiable optimization. We demonstrate the proposed framework in three scenarios including pure translation, initialization inside an unsafe set, and multi-obstacle avoidance. These three scenarios highlight the generation of a non-conservative maneuver, a recovery after starting in collision, and the consideration of multiple obstacles via pairwise CBF constraint, respectively.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adaptive Evolution Factor Risk Ellipse Framework for Reliable and Safe Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    An adaptive risk-field-plus-MPC controller with a sigmoid evolution factor and TTC/TWH-based risk ellipses is claimed to achieve collision-free overtaking and lane changes in simulation.

  2. Safe and Efficient Lane-Changing for Autonomous Vehicles: An Improved Double Quintic Polynomial Approach with Time-to-Collision Evaluation

    cs.RO 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0

    An optimization-based double quintic lane-change planner that penalizes low time-to-collision is proposed and tested in simulation.