Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 cited by

Synthetic Data Generation & Multi-Step RL for Reasoning & Tool Use

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.04736 v2 pith:EHL5ZXW5 submitted 2025-04-07 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords datamulti-stepreasoninggenerationswirlsynthetictaskstool
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning has been shown to improve the performance of large language models. However, traditional approaches like RLHF or RLAIF treat the problem as single-step. As focus shifts toward more complex reasoning and agentic tasks, language models must take multiple steps of text generation, reasoning and environment interaction before generating a solution. We propose a synthetic data generation and RL methodology targeting multi-step optimization scenarios. This approach, called Step-Wise Reinforcement Learning (SWiRL), iteratively generates multi-step reasoning and tool use data, and then learns from that data. It employs a simple step-wise decomposition that breaks each multi-step trajectory into multiple sub-trajectories corresponding to each action by the original model. It then applies synthetic data filtering and RL optimization on these sub-trajectories. We evaluated SWiRL on a number of multi-step tool use, question answering, and mathematical reasoning tasks. Our experiments show that SWiRL outperforms baseline approaches by 21.5%, 12.3%, 14.8%, 11.1%, and 15.3% in relative accuracy on GSM8K, HotPotQA, CofCA, MuSiQue, and BeerQA, respectively. Excitingly, the approach exhibits generalization across tasks: for example, training only on HotPotQA (text question-answering) improves zero-shot performance on GSM8K (a math dataset) by a relative 16.9%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Masked Diffusion Language Models are Strong and Steerable Text-Based World Models for Agentic RL

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Masked diffusion language models, not larger autoregressive LLMs, are the better building block for text-based world models in agentic RL, improving rollout fidelity, diversity, and downstream task success.

  2. Agent Learning via Early Experience

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training agents to predict consequences of their own alternative actions (implicit world modeling) or to reflect on why expert actions were better (self-reflection) consistently improves task success, OOD generalizati...

  3. Distilling Tool Knowledge into Language Models via Back-Translated Traces

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-MATH-7B on LLM-back-translated traces from a SymPy tool agent gives small gains on AIME, AMC, and Olympiad Bench and small losses on MATH500 and GSM8K.

  4. Visual Agentic Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reinforcement fine-tuning with verifiable rewards enables open-source vision-language models to use web search and image-processing code, improving visual QA and multi-hop reasoning.

  5. Chained Recursive Language Models for Multi-Iteration Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Chained fresh-root model calls with plain-text artifacts improve reported long-context reasoning accuracy over a single-call baseline, but the evidence lacks error bars and compute-matched comparison.

  6. Agent-as-Tool: A Study on the Hierarchical Decision Making with Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-level agent that separates planning from tool execution, fine-tuned with GRPO on 180 samples, beats a modified Search-R1 on the Bamboogle QA benchmark.

  7. Revisiting Test-Time Scaling: A Survey and a Diversity-Aware Method for Efficient Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ADAPT, a diversity-aware prefix fine-tuning method, improves best-of-N sampling efficiency for a 1.5B reasoning model, reaching 80% accuracy at N=32 versus N=256 for the baseline.

  8. CRScore++: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Tool and AI Feedback for Code Review

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage SFT+DPO pipeline using linter and code-smell tool outputs plus an LLM judge improves generated code review comments and appears to transfer from Python to Java and JavaScript, though the judge-based evalua...

  9. Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SPaRK, an offline RL method that rewards diverse tool use, reports 40.8% MMLU-Pro accuracy versus 33.0% without diversity, but missing controls and an underspecified reward weaken the claim.

  10. MOTIF: Modular Thinking via Reinforcement Fine-tuning in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-round modular thinking RL fine-tuning method improves a 3B model's pass@1 on MATH500 and AIME2024 over vanilla GRPO in one run, with sample-efficiency claims based on 15% of training questions.

  11. Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes LLM-powered deep research agents into static versus dynamic workflows and single versus multi agent architectures, and reviews their benchmarks and open challenges.

  12. Get Experience from Practice: LLM Agents with Record & Replay

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    AgentRR is a proposed paradigm that records agent traces, generalizes them into multi-level experiences, and replays them under safety checks to make LLM agents cheaper, faster, and more reliable.

  13. Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that maps reinforcement learning methods, datasets, benchmarks, and open-source tools across the full training lifecycle of large language models, focusing on verifiable-reward reasoning.

  14. RACE-Align: Retrieval-Augmented and Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Preference Alignment for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    RACE-Align generates preference pairs from RAG-grounded chain-of-thought answers and applies DPO to align a 1.7B model, showing improved reasoning scores in TCM QA but lacking statistical support.

Pith tools