Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

InstructionBench: An Instructional Video Understanding Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.05040 v2 pith:FT2QKMZX submitted 2025-04-07 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords instructionalvideoinstructionbenchmodelsbenchmarkreasoningunderstandingvideos
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite progress in video large language models (Video-LLMs), research on instructional video understanding, crucial for enhancing access to instructional content, remains insufficient. To address this, we introduce InstructionBench, an Instructional video understanding Benchmark, which challenges models' advanced temporal reasoning within instructional videos characterized by their strict step-by-step flow. Employing GPT-4, we formulate Q&A pairs in open-ended and multiple-choice formats to assess both Coarse-Grained event-level and Fine-Grained object-level reasoning. Our filtering strategies exclude questions answerable purely by common-sense knowledge, focusing on visual perception and analysis when evaluating Video-LLM models. The benchmark finally contains 5k questions across over 700 videos. We evaluate the latest Video-LLMs on our InstructionBench, finding that closed-source models outperform open-source ones. However, even the best model, GPT-4o, achieves only 53.42% accuracy, indicating significant gaps in temporal reasoning. To advance the field, we also develop a comprehensive instructional video dataset with over 19k Q&A pairs from nearly 2.5k videos, using an automated data generation framework, thereby enriching the community's research resources. All data are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/sunwhw/InstructionBench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CausalStep: A Benchmark for Explicit Stepwise Causal Reasoning in Videos

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CausalStep introduces a stepwise video QA protocol and reports that top multimodal models (chain success rate 51%) remain far below human performance (79%) on explicit causal chains.

  2. MAGNET: A Multi-agent Framework for Finding Audio-Visual Needles by Reasoning over Multi-Video Haystacks

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AVHaystacks is a new 3100-question benchmark for audio-visual QA across 500 videos, and the MAGNET multi-agent pipeline beats current baselines on it.

  3. Deep Temporal Reasoning in Video Language Models: A Cross-Linguistic Evaluation of Action Duration and Completion through Perfect Times

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Video-language models perform far below humans on a new quadrilingual benchmark that tests understanding of action completion and duration through grammatical aspect.

  4. $I^2G$: Generating Instructional Illustrations via Text-Conditioned Diffusion

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pairwise-conditioned diffusion model generates instructional illustrations from procedural text and is finetuned with a text-image alignment reward.

Pith tools