REVIEW 2 cited by
Kaleidoscope: In-language Exams for Massively Multilingual Vision Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) has mainly relied on English-language benchmarks, leaving significant gaps in both multilingual and multicultural coverage. While multilingual benchmarks have expanded, both in size and languages, many rely on translations of English datasets, failing to capture cultural nuances. In this work, we propose Kaleidoscope, as the most comprehensive exam benchmark to date for the multilingual evaluation of vision-language models. Kaleidoscope is a large-scale, in-language multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs across diverse languages and visual inputs. Kaleidoscope covers 18 languages and 14 different subjects, amounting to a total of 20,911 multiple-choice questions. Built through an open science collaboration with a diverse group of researchers worldwide, Kaleidoscope ensures linguistic and cultural authenticity. We evaluate top-performing multilingual vision-language models and find that they perform poorly on low-resource languages and in complex multimodal scenarios. Our results highlight the need for progress on culturally inclusive multimodal evaluation frameworks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
NeoBabel: A Multilingual Open Tower for Visual Generation
A 2B multilingual text-to-image model trained on 124M translated pairs matches or beats larger English-only baselines on English while scoring higher on the authors' multilingual benchmark extensions.
-
Assessing the Role of Data Quality in Training Bilingual Language Models
A quality filter trained only on English labels can select better French, German, and Chinese pretraining data, improving bilingual model performance and cutting the monolingual-bilingual gap to about 1%.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.