arxiv: 2504.11909 · v1 · submitted 2025-04-16 · 🌀 gr-qc

Deflection of Light due to Kerr Sen Black Hole in Heterotic String Theory using Material Medium Approach

Saswati Roy , Shubham Kala , Atanu Singha , Hemwati Nandan , A. K. Sen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords light deflectionKerr-Sen black holeheterotic string theorymaterial medium approachframe-dragginggravitational lensing

0

0 comments

The pith

Light deflection by a Kerr-Sen black hole is obtained from the refractive index of an effective material medium that includes frame-dragging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the material medium approach, previously applied to static spherical metrics, to the Kerr-Sen black hole spacetime of heterotic string theory. Frame-dragging is incorporated to find the local speed of light rays, from which the refractive index is constructed and the trajectory is traced. In the far-field limit this produces a deflection angle that is compared with the angles obtained for the Kerr and Schwarzschild solutions in general relativity. A sympathetic reader would care because the method supplies an optical route to quantify how string-theory modifications to black-hole geometry alter observable light bending.

Core claim

Considering the far-field approximation, the deflection of light in the Kerr-Sen spacetime is calculated by deriving the refractive index after incorporating frame-dragging effects on light-ray velocity, and the resulting angle is compared with the corresponding results for the Kerr and Schwarzschild black holes of general relativity.

What carries the argument

The refractive index of the effective material medium, obtained by computing the velocity of light rays that include frame-dragging in the Kerr-Sen geometry.

If this is right

The deflection angle depends on the specific rotation and charge parameters of the Kerr-Sen solution.
Quantitative differences appear between the string-theory case and both the Kerr and Schwarzschild cases in general relativity.
The far-field deflection can be obtained without solving the full geodesic equation.
The same refractive-index construction can be applied to other rotating charged solutions beyond general relativity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the method holds, deflection measurements around candidate string-theory black holes could distinguish them from general-relativity black holes.
The optical analogy may connect to other lensing observables such as image positions or time delays in the same spacetime.
A mismatch between the refractive-index prediction and geodesic results would bound the domain where the material-medium model applies.

Load-bearing premise

The refractive-index construction that works for static spherical metrics remains valid once frame-dragging is present in the spacetime.

What would settle it

An independent calculation of the light deflection angle via null geodesics in the Kerr-Sen metric that disagrees with the refractive-index result for the same parameters would show the extension fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.11909 by A. K. Sen, Atanu Singha, Hemwati Nandan, Saswati Roy, Shubham Kala.

Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Schematic view for the deflection of light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The variation of horizon radii with respect to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The possible regions of the photon sphere as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The possible regions of the photon sphere as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The variation of frame dragging with various parameter and its comparison with other BHs in GR. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The variation of refractive index with radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The variation of refractive index with rotation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The three dimensional view of variation of refrac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗

Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The variation of deflection angle with im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗

Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: This plot compares the results of Roy et al. 2015 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The deflection of light in the gravitational field of a massive body can be analyzed through diverse theoretical approaches. The null geodesic approach is commonly employed to calculate light deflection within strong and weak field limits. Alternatively, several studies have explored the gravitational deflection of light using the material medium approach. For a static, non-rotating spherical mass, the deflection in a Schwarzschild field can be determined by expressing the metric in an isotropic form and evaluating the refractive index to trace the light ray's trajectory. In this study, we extend the above-mentioned approach to the Kerr-Sen black hole spacetime in heterotic string theory, a solution representing a rotating, charged solution in heterotic string theory. The frame-dragging effects inherent to the Kerr-Sen geometry are incorporated to compute the velocity of light rays, enabling the derivation of the refractive index in this field. Considering the far-field approximation, we calculate the deflection of light in the Kerr-Sen spacetime and compare our results with those obtained for the Kerr and Schwarzschild black hole solution in GR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This extends the material-medium refractive index method to Kerr-Sen but the frame-dragging step needs explicit verification against geodesics.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper takes the material-medium approach already used for Schwarzschild light deflection and applies it to the Kerr-Sen black hole. They rewrite the metric in isotropic form, fold in frame-dragging to get an effective light velocity, build the refractive index from that, and then compute the far-field deflection angle for comparison with Kerr and Schwarzschild results in GR. That comparison is the new piece of content relative to earlier papers on the same method. The setup follows the known Kerr-Sen line element and the standard prescription, with no fitted parameters or circular definitions. The far-field expansion itself looks routine. The soft spot is the unverified carry-over of the refractive-index construction once g_tφ terms appear. The original method was derived under static spherical symmetry, and the abstract states they incorporate rotation into the velocity but does not show that the resulting n produces the same deflection as direct null-geodesic integration in the same limit. If the full text contains that cross-check or an error estimate, the results stand; otherwise the comparisons rest on an assumption that may not hold. The citation pattern is standard and points to the relevant prior work on both the metric and the method. This is useful mainly for specialists who want an alternative calculational route for light deflection in heterotic-string black holes or who already work with the material-medium analogy. A reader focused on Kerr-Sen phenomenology or on testing different lensing techniques could extract the numerical differences for reference. It is not going to shift observational practice, but the extension is reasonable enough to warrant checking. I would send it to peer review so referees can examine the derivation steps and confirm whether the rotating case is handled rigorously.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends the material-medium approach for light deflection—previously applied to static spherical metrics by rewriting them in isotropic form and defining a refractive index n from the metric components—to the Kerr-Sen black hole in heterotic string theory. Frame-dragging is incorporated to obtain the light velocity and thence n; the deflection angle is then computed in the far-field limit and compared with the corresponding results for Kerr and Schwarzschild black holes in GR.

Significance. If the refractive-index construction is shown to reproduce the standard null-geodesic deflection once g_tφ terms are present, the work would supply an alternative calculational route for light bending around rotating string-theory black holes. At present the significance is modest because the central step—validity of the isotropic-form n prescription under frame-dragging—remains unverified, so the reported numerical comparisons rest on an unproven equivalence.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and the section deriving the refractive index] The manuscript states that frame-dragging is incorporated to compute the velocity of light rays and thence the refractive index, yet supplies no explicit demonstration that this n, when inserted into the ray-tracing equation, reproduces the deflection angle obtained by direct integration of the null geodesics of the Kerr-Sen metric in the same far-field limit. Because the original isotropic-coordinate construction was derived under static spherical symmetry, the off-diagonal terms introduce an unverified step that is load-bearing for the claimed comparison with Kerr and Schwarzschild results.

minor comments (2)

[Title and abstract] The title and abstract use the spelling 'Kerr Sen' without the hyphen; consistent hyphenation 'Kerr-Sen' should be adopted throughout.
[Metric and refractive-index section] A brief statement of the coordinate system in which the isotropic form is written would clarify how the g_tφ component is handled when extracting the effective speed of light.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed reading and the identification of the central methodological point. We address the concern directly below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and the section deriving the refractive index] The manuscript states that frame-dragging is incorporated to compute the velocity of light rays and thence the refractive index, yet supplies no explicit demonstration that this n, when inserted into the ray-tracing equation, reproduces the deflection angle obtained by direct integration of the null geodesics of the Kerr-Sen metric in the same far-field limit. Because the original isotropic-coordinate construction was derived under static spherical symmetry, the off-diagonal terms introduce an unverified step that is load-bearing for the claimed comparison with Kerr and Schwarzschild results.

Authors: We agree that the extension of the isotropic refractive-index construction to a metric containing a non-zero g_tφ component requires explicit verification before the numerical comparisons with the Kerr and Schwarzschild cases can be regarded as robust. The manuscript derives n from the coordinate velocity that includes frame-dragging, but does not demonstrate that the resulting ray equation reproduces the far-field null-geodesic deflection of the Kerr-Sen spacetime. In the revised manuscript we will add this check: we will compute the deflection angle by direct integration of the null geodesics of the Kerr-Sen metric in the same far-field limit and compare it with the result obtained from the refractive-index ray-tracing equation. This addition will also confirm the consistency of the Kerr and Schwarzschild limits reported in the paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies known Kerr-Sen metric and extends material-medium method without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper takes the established Kerr-Sen line element as given, expresses it in isotropic form, incorporates frame-dragging to obtain light velocity and refractive index n, then integrates the ray trajectory in the far-field limit to obtain the deflection angle. This sequence is a direct calculation rather than a self-definitional loop, a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, or a central claim resting only on self-citation. No equation is shown to equal its own input by construction, and the comparison to Kerr/Schwarzschild cases follows from performing the same procedure on each metric. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the standard Kerr-Sen metric (taken from heterotic string theory literature) and on the material-medium formalism previously developed for static metrics; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The Kerr-Sen line element is the correct rotating charged solution in heterotic string theory.
Invoked when the metric is used to construct the refractive index.
domain assumption The material-medium refractive-index prescription extends to stationary spacetimes once frame-dragging is included.
This is the central modeling choice that allows the deflection calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5730 in / 1341 out tokens · 37955 ms · 2026-05-22T20:36:33.570815+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

(1 − rg−2b 4ρ )2 + 2rg α ρ dϕ cdt (1 + rg−2b 4ρ )2 + 2b ρ # c2dt2 − 1 + rg − 2b 4ρ 2 (1 + rg − 2b 4ρ )2 + 2b ρ dρ2 − ρ2 1 + rg − 2b 4ρ 2 (1 + rg − 2b 4ρ )2 + 2b ρ (dθ2 + dϕ2) =

and for static charged body by RN and JNW met- ric [37]. To express the above line element, expressed by Eq. (14), in isotropic form, we introduce a new radial coordinate ρ with the following transformation equation, r = ρ(1 + rg − 2b 4ρ )2 (15) or, ρ = 1 2 r + (b − rg 2 ) + r (r + (b − rg 2 ))2 − (b − rg 2 )2 (16) which in turn leads to, dr dρ = (1 + rg ...

work page 2015
[2]

K. Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das gravitationsfeld eines massenpunktes nach der einsteinschen theorie, Sitzungs- berichte der k¨ oniglich preussischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften , 189 (1916)

work page 1916
[3]

R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Physical review letters 11, 237 (1963)

work page 1963
[4]

Reissner, ¨Uber die eigengravitation des elektrischen feldes nach der einsteinschen theorie, Annalen der Physik 355, 106 (1916)

H. Reissner, ¨Uber die eigengravitation des elektrischen feldes nach der einsteinschen theorie, Annalen der Physik 355, 106 (1916)

work page 1916
[5]

Nordstr¨ om, On the energy of the gravitation field in einstein’s theory, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings Series B Physical Sciences 20, 1238 (1918)

G. Nordstr¨ om, On the energy of the gravitation field in einstein’s theory, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings Series B Physical Sciences 20, 1238 (1918)

work page 1918
[6]

A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Reality of the schwarzschild singularity, Physical Review Letters 20, 878 (1968)

work page 1968
[7]

E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Ex- ton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, Metric of a rotating, charged mass, Journal of mathematical physics 6, 918 (1965)

work page 1965
[8]

Fujii and K.-i

Y. Fujii and K.-i. Maeda, The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

work page 2003
[9]

Lectures on String Theory

D. Tong, Lectures on string theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:0908.0333 (2009)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[10]

Aspects of warped braneworld models

S. SenGupta, Aspects of warped braneworld models, arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.1092 (2008)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[11]

Thiemann, Lectures on loop quantum gravity, in Quantum gravity: From theory to experimental search (Springer, 2003) pp

T. Thiemann, Lectures on loop quantum gravity, in Quantum gravity: From theory to experimental search (Springer, 2003) pp. 41–135

work page 2003
[12]

Mignemi and N

S. Mignemi and N. Stewart, Charged black holes in effec- tive string theory, Physical Review D 47, 5259 (1993)

work page 1993
[13]

G. W. Gibbons and K.-i. Maeda, Black holes and mem- branes in higher-dimensional theories with dilaton fields, Nuclear Physics B 298, 741 (1988)

work page 1988
[14]

Sen, Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory, Physical Review Letters 69, 1006 (1992)

A. Sen, Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory, Physical Review Letters 69, 1006 (1992)

work page 1992
[15]

Gravitational lensing by a charged black hole of string theory

A. Bhadra, Gravitational lensing by a charged black hole of string theory, Phys. Rev. D 67, 103009 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0306016

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[16]

G. N. Gyulchev and S. S. Yazadjiev, Kerr-sen dilaton- axion black hole lensing in the strong deflection limit, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 75, 023006 (2007)

work page 2007
[17]

G. N. Gyulchev and S. S. Yazadjiev, Analytical kerr-sen dilaton-axion black hole lensing in the weak deflection limit, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 81, 023005 (2010)

work page 2010
[18]

H. M. Siahaan, Destroying kerr-sen black holes, Physical Review D 93, 064028 (2016)

work page 2016
[19]

Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole, Annals of Physics 82, 548 (1974)

R. Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole, Annals of Physics 82, 548 (1974). 16

work page 1974
[20]

S. V. M. C. Xavier, P. V. Cunha, L. C. Crispino, and C. A. Herdeiro, Shadows of charged rotating black holes: Kerr–newman versus kerr–sen, International Journal of Modern Physics D 29, 2041005 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

M. Guo, S. Song, and H. Yan, Observational signature of a near-extremal kerr-sen black hole in the heterotic string theory, Physical Review D 101, 024055 (2020)

work page 2020
[22]

Uniyal, H

R. Uniyal, H. Nandan, and K. Purohit, Null geodesics and observables around the kerr–sen black hole, Classical and Quantum Gravity 35, 025003 (2017)

work page 2017
[23]

Uniyal, H

R. Uniyal, H. Nandan, and P. Jetzer, Bending angle of light in equatorial plane of kerr–sen black hole, Physics Letters B 782, 185 (2018)

work page 2018
[24]

C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravi- tation (Macmillan, 1973)

work page 1973
[25]

Weinberg, Principles and applications of the general theory of relativity: gravitation and cosmology (Wiley, 1972)

S. Weinberg, Principles and applications of the general theory of relativity: gravitation and cosmology (Wiley, 1972)

work page 1972
[26]

Schneider, J

P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. Falco, Gravitational lenses springer-verlag, Berlin Inc., New York (1992)

work page 1992
[27]

Tamm, The electrodynamics of anisotropic media in the special theory of relativity, Zh

I. Tamm, The electrodynamics of anisotropic media in the special theory of relativity, Zh. Rus. Fiz.-Khim. Ob- shchestva, Otd. Fiz 56, 248 (1924)

work page 1924
[28]

Balazs, Effect of a gravitational field, due to a rotating body, on the plane of polarization of an electromagnetic wave, Physical Review 110, 236 (1958)

N. Balazs, Effect of a gravitational field, due to a rotating body, on the plane of polarization of an electromagnetic wave, Physical Review 110, 236 (1958)

work page 1958
[29]

Plebanski, Electromagnetic waves in gravitational fields, Physical Review 118, 1396 (1960)

J. Plebanski, Electromagnetic waves in gravitational fields, Physical Review 118, 1396 (1960)

work page 1960
[30]

Mashhoon, Influence of gravitation on the propagation of electromagnetic radiation, Physical Review D 11, 2679 (1975)

B. Mashhoon, Influence of gravitation on the propagation of electromagnetic radiation, Physical Review D 11, 2679 (1975)

work page 1975
[31]

Fischbach and B

E. Fischbach and B. S. Freeman, Second-order contri- bution to the gravitational deflection of light, Physical Review D 22, 2950 (1980)

work page 1980
[32]

Evans and M

J. Evans and M. Rosenquist, F= ma optics, Am. J. Phys 54, 876 (1986)

work page 1986
[33]

Evans, K

J. Evans, K. K. Nandi, and A. Islam, The optical– mechanical analogy in general relativity: New methods for the paths of light and of the planets, American Jour- nal of Physics 64, 1404 (1996)

work page 1996
[34]

Sereno, Gravitational lensing in metric theories of gravity, Physical Review D 67, 064007 (2003)

M. Sereno, Gravitational lensing in metric theories of gravity, Physical Review D 67, 064007 (2003)

work page 2003
[35]

Sereno, Weak field limit of reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole lensing, Physical Review D 69, 023002 (2004)

M. Sereno, Weak field limit of reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole lensing, Physical Review D 69, 023002 (2004)

work page 2004
[36]

Sen, A more exact expression for the gravitational deflection of light, derived using material medium ap- proach, Astrophysics 53, 560 (2010)

A. Sen, A more exact expression for the gravitational deflection of light, derived using material medium ap- proach, Astrophysics 53, 560 (2010)

work page 2010
[37]

Roy and A

S. Roy and A. Sen, Trajectory of a light ray in kerr field: A material medium approach, Astrophysics and Space Science 360, 1 (2015)

work page 2015
[38]

Roy and A

S. Roy and A. Sen, Deflection of light ray due to a charged body using material medium approach, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung A 72, 1113 (2017)

work page 2017
[39]

del Barco, An accurate equation for the gravitational bending of light by a static massive object, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society535, 2504 (2024)

O. del Barco, An accurate equation for the gravitational bending of light by a static massive object, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society535, 2504 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

M. L. Ruggiero, Effects of gravitational waves on electro- magnetic fields, The European Physical Journal C 85, 1 (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

D. Wu, P. Wu, H. Yu, and S.-Q. Wu, Are ultraspinning kerr-sen-ads 4 black holes always superentropic?, Physi- cal Review D 102, 044007 (2020)

work page 2020
[42]

A. Y. Burinskii, Some properties of the kerr solution to low energy string theory, Physical Review D 52, 5826 (1995)

work page 1995
[43]

J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsk` y, Exact space-times in Einstein’s general relativity(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

work page 2009
[44]

Zhang and J

M. Zhang and J. Jiang, Escape probability of particle from kerr-sen black hole, Nuclear Physics B 964, 115313 (2021)

work page 2021
[45]

Feng and H

X.-H. Feng and H. L¨ u, On the size of rotating black holes, The European Physical Journal C 80, 1 (2020)

work page 2020
[46]

L. D. Landau, The classical theory of fields , Vol. 2 (Else- vier, 2013)

work page 2013
[47]

Born and E

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of optics: electromag- netic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light (Elsevier, 2013)

work page 2013
[48]

Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes, Vol

S. Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes, Vol. 69 (Oxford University Press, 1998)

work page 1998
[49]

The geometry of photon surfaces

C.-M. Claudel, K. S. Virbhadra, and G. F. R. Ellis, The Geometry of photon surfaces, J. Math. Phys. 42, 818 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0005050

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[50]

S. V. Iyer and E. C. Hansen, Light’s Bending Angle in the Equatorial Plane of a Kerr Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D 80, 124023 (2009), arXiv:0907.5352 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[51]

Hsiao, D.-S

Y.-W. Hsiao, D.-S. Lee, and C.-Y. Lin, Equatorial light bending around Kerr-Newman black holes, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064070 (2020), arXiv:1910.04372 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020