REVIEW 10 cited by
A Comprehensive Survey of Reward Models: Taxonomy, Applications, Challenges, and Future
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Reward Model (RM) has demonstrated impressive potential for enhancing Large Language Models (LLM), as RM can serve as a proxy for human preferences, providing signals to guide LLMs' behavior in various tasks. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of relevant research, exploring RMs from the perspectives of preference collection, reward modeling, and usage. Next, we introduce the applications of RMs and discuss the benchmarks for evaluation. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the challenges existing in the field and dive into the potential research directions. This paper is dedicated to providing beginners with a comprehensive introduction to RMs and facilitating future studies. The resources are publicly available at github\footnote{https://github.com/JLZhong23/awesome-reward-models}.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Agents Don't Just Agree, They Remember: Benchmarking Persistent Sycophancy in Stateful Personal Agents
Stateful personal agents convert conversational sycophancy into durable memory commits that raise later failure rates by about 27 points once claims are written to state.
-
Toward Robust LLM-Based Judges: Taxonomic Bias Evaluation and Debiasing Optimization
JudgeBiasBench measures 12 LLM-judge bias types under a 4-dimension taxonomy, and bias-aware GRPO/InfoNCE training cuts BSR substantially while preserving general evaluation performance.
-
GM-PRM: A Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning
A generative multimodal process reward model that produces step-level critiques and corrections improves average math accuracy for six multimodal LLMs by 2.9 to 5.9 points under a refinement-based Best-of-N strategy.
-
The Other Mind: How Language Models Exhibit Human Temporal Cognition
Larger LLMs develop a subjective 'present' around the current date, and their year similarity judgments follow a logarithmic Weber-Fechner compression, with supporting neural and representational evidence.
-
Uncertainty-aware Reward Design Process
URDP couples LLM-based reward component design with uncertainty-weighted Bayesian optimization, reporting better reward quality and efficiency than Eureka and Text2Reward on three benchmarks.
-
RAG-Zeval: Towards Robust and Interpretable Evaluation on RAG Responses through End-to-End Rule-Guided Reasoning
RAG-Zeval uses rule-guided RL with ranking rewards on synthetic responses to train a 7B model that evaluates RAG faithfulness and correctness competitively with 70B-class judges.
-
Guided by Gut: Efficient Test-Time Scaling with Reinforced Intrinsic Confidence
Guided by Gut lets an LLM guide its own search using token-level confidence and step novelty, with a RL fine-tuning step to calibrate that confidence, achieving PRM-level accuracy at far lower compute and memory.
-
Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation
A taxonomy-driven survey arguing that reward design is the central mechanism shaping reliable LLM reasoning, with maps of reward paradigms, reward-hacking failure modes, and benchmark pitfalls.
-
Reward Reasoning Model
Reward models that think before judging, trained via reinforcement learning without human-written reasoning traces, outperform standard reward models and improve with more test-time compute.
-
Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle
A survey that maps reinforcement learning methods, datasets, benchmarks, and open-source tools across the full training lifecycle of large language models, focusing on verifiable-reward reasoning.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.