Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Topological linear and nonlinear gap modes in defected dimer lattice with fourth-order diffraction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a defected dimer lattice with fourth-order diffraction, in-phase, out-of-phase, and edge linear modes each spawn power-thresholdless gap solitons whose stability window widens as the diffraction strength grows.

desk verdict A workmanlike numerical study of gap solitons in a defected dimer lattice with fourth-order diffraction, but the 'topological' label is only established for the edge modes and the numerical details are missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14639 v2 pith:NV2HVCIY submitted 2025-04-20 physics.optics nlin.PS

Xiaoyang Wang , Qidong Fu , Changming Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsnlin.PS
keywords topologicalgapsolitonsdimerlatticefourth-orderdiffractiondefectmodesZakphasenonlinearSchrödingerequationopticalwaveguidearrays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a one-dimensional dimer waveguide lattice with a single unit-cell defect at its center, described by a nonlinear Schrödinger equation that includes fourth-order diffraction. It claims that in the nontrivial dimerization regime, the spectral gap contains four localized linear modes: an in-phase defect mode, an out-of-phase defect mode, and two edge modes. Under both focusing and defocusing cubic nonlinearity, each linear mode gives rise to a family of power-thresholdless gap solitons that bifurcate from it. The paper further argues that the fourth-order diffraction coefficient is a useful control: as this coefficient grows, the spectral gap widens and the stability window of the solitons broadens, with the sign of the nonlinearity determining which soliton type is stabilized.

What carries the argument

The central object is a one-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a fourth-order diffraction term, a deep super-Gaussian dimer lattice potential, and a missing unit cell at the center. The classification machinery is the Zak phase of the infinite periodic dimer lattice, which separates trivial from nontrivial regimes. The argument then runs through the linear eigenproblem of a 34-waveguide chain with a central defect, whose four in-gap eigenvalues produce the seed modes, and through continuation of those modes in the propagation constant using Newton iteration to obtain soliton families. Stability is assessed by linearized perturbation analysis with eigenvalues and corroborated by direct propagation.

What would settle it

Remove the central defect or terminate the chain differently and recompute the linear spectrum and eigenmodes of the finite chain; if the four in-gap eigenvalues and their profiles persist almost unchanged, the topological defect-mode label is doing no work. Alternatively, shift the defect from the chain center to an off-center unit cell and check whether the number of in-gap modes and their in-phase and out-of-phase ordering follow the Zak-phase prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, within the nontrivial dimerized regime (dimerization parameter greater than one, meaning the intra-cell waveguide spacing exceeds the inter-cell spacing), a defected dimer lattice hosts three types of localized gap modes—an in-phase defect mode, an out-of-phase defect mode, and two edge modes—and that each of these linear modes is the seed of a nonlinear soliton family. The solitons are power-thresholdless: their power tends to zero as the propagation constant approaches the linear eigenvalue, confirming bifurcation from the linear modes. The fourth-order diffraction term plays a dual role: it increases the size of the spectral gap and shifts the stability map so that, for example, in-phase solitons become stable for focusing nonlinearity when the diffraction strength is large, while out-of-phase solitons are stabilized for defocusing nonlinearity. The Zak phase of the infinite periodic lattice is computed to classify the regime as topologically nontrivial, and the in-gap modes are identified as topological defect and edge states.

Load-bearing premise

The paper labels the in-gap modes as topological using a Zak phase computed for the infinite, defect-free periodic lattice, then applies that label to a finite 34-waveguide chain with a central unit-cell defect, without demonstrating that the modes disappear or change when the defect is removed or the boundaries are altered.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a nontrivial dimerized lattice, one can expect three coexisting families of gap solitons—in-phase, out-of-phase, and edge—whose existence is thresholdless in power.
  • Fourth-order diffraction is a usable control knob: increasing its strength widens the spectral gap, making the solitons' propagation constants tunable over a larger interval.
  • The stability map flips with diffraction strength: for focusing nonlinearity, larger values stabilize in-phase solitons and smaller values stabilize out-of-phase solitons; for defocusing nonlinearity the ordering is reversed.
  • Stable propagation over distances on the order of 40,000 diffraction lengths was observed for a specific in-phase soliton, implying the states are practically observable in waveguide arrays.
  • Edge solitons remain stable within the gap for small diffraction strength, so the lattice ends can serve as reliable single-channel guides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the topological label is load-bearing, the in-gap defect and edge solitons should be resistant to moderate on-site disorder; the paper does not test this, but it is a direct and testable extension.
  • The same bifurcation scenario should occur for other local perturbations, such as vacancy defects, width mismatches, or phase slips, provided the dimerization stays nontrivial; the mechanism is local to the gap and not specific to the unit-cell defect geometry.
  • The reported diffraction-strength-dependent stability switch suggests a practical all-optical switching scheme: one device, two soliton species, and a diffraction-strength knob that selects which one is stable.
  • Because the Zak phase is computed for the infinite lattice, an interesting check is to compute a real-space topological marker for the finite defected chain to see whether the four in-gap modes indeed carry the topological charge predicted by the bulk invariant.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a one-dimensional dimer waveguide lattice with a central unit-cell defect and fourth-order diffraction, described by Eq. (1). It computes the linear Floquet-Bloch spectrum and the bulk Zak phase of the infinite periodic lattice, then identifies four in-gap linear modes in a finite 34-waveguide chain: an out-of-phase defect mode (j=15), two edge modes (j=16,17), and an in-phase defect mode (j=18). Using Newton iteration it constructs soliton families bifurcating from each of these modes for both focusing and defocusing nonlinearities, and analyzes their stability via a linearized eigenvalue problem and direct propagation. The central claims are that all three types of gap solitons are topological, that they bifurcate from their linear counterparts as the propagation constant approaches the linear eigenvalue, and that increasing the fourth-order diffraction strength enlarges the spectral gap and widens stability windows.

Significance. If the numerical results are valid, the paper contributes a systematic study of gap solitons in a defected dimer lattice with fourth-order diffraction, including bifurcation curves, profiles, and stability. The internal consistency of the results—power tending to zero at the linear eigenvalues and the standard linearization for stability—lends initial credibility. The most novel claim, however, is the topological characterization of all three soliton families, and that claim is not supported by the evidence presented. The paper also lacks the numerical details needed for reproduction. With reframing or additional evidence, the results could be of value to researchers in nonlinear topological photonics, but the current manuscript overstates the topological content.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and discussion, Figs. 2(c) and 3(d)-(h); Abstract and Conclusion] The paper labels all three soliton families as 'topological gap solitons,' but the only topological invariant computed is the bulk Zak phase of the infinite, undefected dimer lattice (Fig. 2(c)). That invariant can at most justify the existence of the two edge modes j=16 and j=17. The modes j=15 and j=18 are explicitly called 'out-of-phase defect mode' and 'in-phase defect mode' in the text, and no argument or numerical test connects these central-impurity bound states to the bulk Zak phase. No experiment such as removing the defect, changing the boundary termination, or adding disorder is presented to distinguish topologically protected states from ordinary impurity modes, which generically appear in defect lattices even without nontrivial bulk topology. The topological characterization of the in-phase and out-of-phase soliton families is therefore unsupported, and the abstract's claim of 'three types of topological gap solitons' is not established.
  2. [Theoretical model and Results and discussion (Eqs. (1)-(3))] The manuscript reports extensive quantitative results—gap widths as functions of χ, stability windows, and maximum growth rates such as Re(λ)~10^{-3}—but it never specifies the numerical methods in reproducible detail. There is no statement of the transverse domain size, the number of grid points, the discretization scheme, the boundary conditions, the Newton iteration tolerance, the continuation step, or the eigenvalue solver parameters. No convergence tests are presented. The statement in the text that Eq. (3) is 'numerically solved using the difference method combined with an eigenvalue solver' is insufficient for the reader to verify the results or assess the accuracy of claimed thresholds such as the weakly unstable region in Fig. 6.
  3. [Theoretical model and Fig. 1] The defect geometry is not defined quantitatively. The text states only that 'a unit cell defect was introduced at the center of the lattice' and Fig. 1 shows a schematic with a red dashed box, but it does not specify how the potential V(x) is modified relative to the perfect periodic dimer lattice—whether the central unit cell is removed, whether waveguides are displaced, or whether a waveguide is omitted. Because the existence, symmetry, and bifurcation properties of the in-phase and out-of-phase defect modes depend directly on this choice, the model as presented cannot be reproduced by an independent group.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The sentence beginning 'two-dimensional topological insulator structures can been employed' contains a grammatical error ('can been' should be 'can be').
  2. [Results and discussion, Fig. 3 caption and text] The text refers to '[Figs. 3(e), (f), (g), and (f)]'; the last label should be (h).
  3. [Theoretical model and Fig. 2(c)] The phrase 'for γ<1 and γ>1, the boundary waveguide distributions in truncated finite waveguides exhibit substantial differences, leading to distinct Zak phases' inverts the logical order: the Zak phase is a bulk property that determines the presence or absence of boundary modes, not the reverse. Recasting this sentence would avoid confusion.
  4. [Results and discussion, Fig. 2] The statement that the b(k) curves 'exhibit minimal variation for γ=0.7 and γ=1.4' is vague; since the spectra likely differ in gap width and band curvatures, a quantitative comparison would be more informative.
  5. [References] References [29] and [45] are the same paper (Liangwei Dong and Fangwei Ye, Phys. Rev. A 82, 053829 (2010)); one of them should be removed or they should be cross-referenced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the numerical derivation is self-contained, and the questionable topological label on defect modes is a validity concern, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is numerically self-contained. The linear localized modes are obtained by direct diagonalization of Eq. (1) with σ=0 for a fixed finite lattice (p=4.0, d=0.5, L=4.7), not by fitting any target quantity. The soliton families are solved from the nonlinear Eq. (2) by Newton iteration, and the claimed bifurcation from the linear modes is independently evidenced by the power U→0 and smooth form-factor behavior as b→b_lin; the initial guess from the linear eigenmode does not force this limiting behavior unless the nonlinear equations actually admit it. Stability is assessed through the independent linearized eigenvalue problem (3), and the reported gap-size enlargement with χ is a direct spectral observation. The Zak phase is computed from Bloch functions of the infinite periodic lattice, so it is not constructed from the finite-chain gap modes; it is used as a classifier for the two edge modes. The main weakness, that the in-phase (j=18) and out-of-phase (j=15) modes are labeled 'topological gap solitons' in the abstract although the paper itself identifies them only as 'defect modes' and provides no bulk-boundary or invariant argument for them, is an evidentiary/validity concern rather than a circularity: no equation or fitted parameter reduces to itself. The only self-citation (Ref. [22]) is not load-bearing; the model and Zak-phase formula are cited to external works [64,65,66].

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a hand-chosen numerical model with parameters p=4.0, d=0.5, L=4.7, and n=17; the control parameters gamma and chi are scanned over a small set. No new physical entities are introduced. The topological classification is assumed to transfer from the bulk Zak phase to the finite defected lattice, and the numerical solvers are assumed to converge without reported validation.

free parameters (6)
  • lattice depth p = 4.0
    Chosen by hand to define the potential; no experimental mapping or sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • waveguide width d = 0.5
    Chosen by hand for the super-Gaussian potential; results may depend on this width.
  • unit cell length L = 4.7
    Sets the dimer period and is fixed for all simulations without justification.
  • number of unit cells n = 17 (34 waveguides)
    Finite-size choice that affects edge modes, defect modes, and stability windows.
  • dimerization ratio gamma = 0.7 and 1.4
    Scanned to move between trivial and nontrivial phases; not derived from a physical platform.
  • fourth-order diffraction strength chi = 0, 0.15, 0.5
    Central control parameter, but only a few discrete values are sampled, so the stability-broadening claim is sparse.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The higher-order nonlinear Schrodinger equation with fourth-order diffraction, Eq. (1), is the correct envelope model for the system.
    Taken from prior literature, refs [64, 65], without derivation from Maxwell equations or comparison to experiment.
  • domain assumption The lattice potential has the super-Gaussian form exp(-((x-x_m)/d)^6) with fixed p, d, and L.
    This potential shape and parameter set are assumed; no sensitivity check or experimental basis is given.
  • domain assumption The Zak phase of the infinite periodic lattice classifies modes of the finite defected lattice.
    Bulk-boundary correspondence is invoked without proof for the defected, truncated chain, so the topological label for the gap modes is assumed.
  • standard math The Floquet-Bloch ansatz with periodic boundary conditions is valid for the infinite lattice.
    Standard Bloch theory; used to compute the band spectrum b(k) and the Zak phase.
  • domain assumption The Newton iteration and eigenvalue solvers converge to the reported stationary solutions and stability spectra.
    No grid sizes, tolerances, or convergence tests are reported, so numerical convergence is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological linear and nonlinear gap modes in defected dimer lattice with fourth-order diffraction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NV2HVCIY

@misc{pith2026250414639,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological linear and nonlinear gap modes in defected dimer lattice with fourth-order diffraction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NV2HVCIY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14639}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we investigate the optical properties of linear and nonlinear topological in-phase, out-of-phase, and edge modes in a defected dimer lattice with fourth-order diffraction, encompassing their bifurcation characteristics, localized field distributions, and stability properties. Both focusing and defocusing nonlinearities are considered. Within the nontrivial regime, in-phase, out-of-phase, and edge modes can emerge within the gap. Numerical results reveal that three types of topological gap solitons bifurcate from their corresponding linear localized modes. The dimerization parameter can be tuned to drive the system from a trivial to a nontrivial configuration. We observe that as the strength of the fourth-order diffraction increases, the size of the spectral gap also enlarges, with this parameter effectively broadening the stability window for solitons. Our findings offer novel insights into the properties of both linear and nonlinear modes in topologically defected structures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 82(4):3045–3067, November 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c

    Ling Lu, John D. Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Topological photonics. Nat. Photonics , 8(11):821–829, October 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Khanikaev and Gennady Shvets

    Alexander B. Khanikaev and Gennady Shvets. Two- dimensional topological photonics. Nat. Photonics , 11(12):763–773, November 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal

    Zheng Wang, YD Chong, John D Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 100(1):013905, 2008

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Zheng Wang, Yidong Chong, J. D. Joannopou- los, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Observation of unidirec- tional backscattering-immune topological electromag- netic states. Nature, 461(7265):772–775, October 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Realizing effec- tive magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation

    Kejie Fang, Zongfu Yu, and Shanhui Fan. Realizing effec- tive magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation. Nat. Photonics , 6(11):782–787, October 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Photonic floquet topological insulators

    Mikael C Rechtsman, Julia M Zeuner, Yonatan Plot- nik, Yaakov Lumer, Daniel Podolsky, Felix Dreisow, Stefan Nolte, Mordechai Segev, and Alexander Sza- meit. Photonic floquet topological insulators. Nature, 496(7444):196–200, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Self-localized states in photonic topological insulators

    Yaakov Lumer, Yonatan Plotnik, Mikael C.Rechtsman, and Mordechai Segev. Self-localized states in photonic topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 111(24), Decem- ber 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Edge solitons in nonlinear-photonic topological insulators

    Daniel Leykam and Y.D.Chong. Edge solitons in nonlinear-photonic topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(14), September 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    Photonic floquet topological insulators in a fractal lattice

    Zhaoju Yang, Eran Lustig, Yaakov Lumer, and Mordechai Segev. Photonic floquet topological insulators in a fractal lattice. Light: Sci. Appl. , 9(1), July 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Edge solitons in lieb topological floquet insulator

    Sergey K Ivanov, Yaroslav V Kartashov, Lukas J Maczewsky, Alexander Szameit, and Vladimir V Kono- top. Edge solitons in lieb topological floquet insulator. Opt. Lett., 45(6):1459–1462, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Ivanov, Yaroslav V

    Sergey K. Ivanov, Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Alexander Sza- meit, Lluis Torner, and Vladimir V. Konotop. Vector 7 topological edge solitons in floquet insulators. ACS Pho- tonics, 7(3):735–745, February 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Topological dipole floquet solitons

    Sergey K Ivanov, Yaroslav V Kartashov, Matthias Hein- rich, Alexander Szameit, Lluis Torner, and Vladimir V Konotop. Topological dipole floquet solitons. Phys. Rev. A, 103(5):053507, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    Nonlinear topological photonics

    Daria Smirnova, Daniel Leykam, Yidong Chong, and Yuri Kivshar. Nonlinear topological photonics. Appl. Phys. Rev., 7(2), 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Topological phenomena at defects in acoustic, photonic and solid- state lattices

    Zhi-Kang Lin, Qiang Wang, Yang Liu, Haoran Xue, Baile Zhang, Yidong Chong, and Jian-Hua Jiang. Topological phenomena at defects in acoustic, photonic and solid- state lattices. Nat. Rev. Phys. , 5(8):483–495, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Benalcazar, Sheng Huang, Matthew J

    Jiho Noh, Wladimir A. Benalcazar, Sheng Huang, Matthew J. Collins, Kevin P. Chen, Taylor L. Hughes, and Mikael C. Rechtsman. Topological protection of photonic mid-gap defect modes. Nat. Photonics , 12(7):408–415, June 2018

    2018

  9. [17]

    Khanikaev

    Mengyao Li, Dmitry Zhirihin, Maxim Gorlach, Xiang Ni, Dmitry Filonov, Alexey Slobozhanyuk, Andrea Al` u, and Alexander B. Khanikaev. Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions. Nat. Photonics , 14(2):89–94, December 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Kirsch, Yiqi Zhang, Mark Kremer, Lukas J

    Marco S. Kirsch, Yiqi Zhang, Mark Kremer, Lukas J. Maczewsky, Sergey K. Ivanov, Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Lluis Torner, Dieter Bauer, Alexander Szameit, and Matthias Heinrich. Nonlinear second-order photonic topological insulators. Nat. Phys. , 17(9):995–1000, July 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Bulk–disclination correspondence in topological crys- talline insulators

    Yang Liu, Shuwai Leung, Fei-Fei Li, Zhi-Kang Lin, Xiufeng Tao, Yin Poo, and Jian-Hua Jiang. Bulk–disclination correspondence in topological crys- talline insulators. Nature, 589(7842):381–385, January 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Arkhipova, Yiqi Zhang, Yaroslav V

    Boquan Ren, Antonina A. Arkhipova, Yiqi Zhang, Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Hongguang Wang, Sergei A. Zhuravitskii, Nikolay N. Skryabin, Ivan V. Dyakonov, Alexander A. Kalinkin, Sergei P. Kulik, Victor O. Kom- panets, Sergey V. Chekalin, and Victor N. Zadkov. Ob- servation of nonlin...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Kartashov, Yongdong Li, and Yiqi Zhang

    Boquan Ren, Hongguang Wang, Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Yongdong Li, and Yiqi Zhang. Nonlinear photonic discli- nation states. APL Photonics , 8(1), January 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Kartashov, and Fangwei Ye

    Changming Huang, Ce Shang, Yaroslav V. Kartashov, and Fangwei Ye. Vortex solitons in topological disclina- tion lattices. Nanophotonics, 13(18):3495–3502, January 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Kartashov and Vladimir V

    Yaroslav V. Kartashov and Vladimir V. Konotop. Topo- logical star junctions: Linear modes and solitons. Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 179:114461, February 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices

    Henning Schomerus. Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices. Opt. Lett. , 38(11):1912–1914, 2013

    1912

  17. [25]

    Topologically protected mid- gap states induced by impurity in one-dimensional super- lattices

    Li-Jun Lang and Shu Chen. Topologically protected mid- gap states induced by impurity in one-dimensional super- lattices. J. Phys., B , 47(6):065302, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    Topological multiband photonic superlattices

    Bikashkali Midya and Liang Feng. Topological multiband photonic superlattices. Phys. Rev. A, 98(4):043838, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Band- gap guidance in optically induced photonic lattices with a negative defect

    Igor Makasyuk, Zhigang Chen, and Jianke Yang. Band- gap guidance in optically induced photonic lattices with a negative defect. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 96(22), June 2006

    2006

  20. [28]

    Kartashov, Victor A

    Fangwei Ye, Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Victor A. Vysloukh, and Lluis Torner. Nonlinear switching of low-index defect modes in photonic lattices. Phys. Rev. A , 78(1), July 2008

    2008

  21. [29]

    Shaping solitons by lat- tice defects

    Liangwei Dong and Fangwei Ye. Shaping solitons by lat- tice defects. Phys. Rev. A , 82(5), November 2010

    2010

  22. [30]

    Observation of protected photonic edge states induced by real-space topological lattice defects

    Qiang Wang, Haoran Xue, Baile Zhang, and Y.D.Chong. Observation of protected photonic edge states induced by real-space topological lattice defects. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 124(24), June 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Asym- metric defects in one-dimensional photonic lattices.Laser Phys., 31(2):023001, January 2021

    Slavica Jovanovi´ c and Marija Stojanovi´ c Krasi´ c. Asym- metric defects in one-dimensional photonic lattices.Laser Phys., 31(2):023001, January 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Bound vortex light in an emulated topolog- ical defect in photonic lattices

    Chong Sheng, Yao Wang, Yijun Chang, Huiming Wang, Yongheng Lu, Yingyue Yang, Shining Zhu, Xianmin Jin, and Hui Liu. Bound vortex light in an emulated topolog- ical defect in photonic lattices. Light: Sci. Appl. , 11(1), August 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Defect solitons in pho- tonic lattices

    Jianke Yang and Zhigang Chen. Defect solitons in pho- tonic lattices. Phys. Rev. E , 73(2):026609, 2006

    2006

  26. [34]

    Fun- damental solitons in parity-time symmetric lattice with a vacancy defect

    Mahmut Ba˘ gcı,˙Ilkay Bakırta¸ s, and Nalan Antar. Fun- damental solitons in parity-time symmetric lattice with a vacancy defect. Opt. Commun. , 356:472–481, 2015

    2015

  27. [35]

    Defect solitons in parity-time periodic potentials

    Hang Wang and Jiandong Wang. Defect solitons in parity-time periodic potentials. Opt. Express , 19(5):4030–4035, 2011

    2011

  28. [36]

    Defect solitons in parity-time symmetric superlattices

    Zhien Lu and Zhi-Ming Zhang. Defect solitons in parity-time symmetric superlattices. Opt. Express , 19(12):11457–11462, 2011

    2011

  29. [37]

    Defect solitons in parity-time-symmetric op- tical lattices with nonlocal nonlinearity

    Sumei Hu, Xuekai Ma, Daquan Lu, Yizhou Zheng, and Wei Hu. Defect solitons in parity-time-symmetric op- tical lattices with nonlocal nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A , 85(4):043826, 2012

    2012

  30. [38]

    Localized modes and dark solitons sustained by nonlinear defects

    Liangwei Zeng, Vladimir V Konotop, Xiaowei Lu, Yi Cai, Qifan Zhu, and Jingzhen Li. Localized modes and dark solitons sustained by nonlinear defects. Opt. Lett. , 46(9):2216–2219, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Surface defect gap solitons

    WH Chen, YJ He, and HZ Wang. Surface defect gap solitons. Opt. Express, 14(23):11271–11276, 2006

    2006

  32. [40]

    Defect soli- tons in two-dimensional optical lattices

    WH Chen, X Zhu, TW Wu, and RH Li. Defect soli- tons in two-dimensional optical lattices. Opt. Express , 18(11):10956–10962, 2010

    2010

  33. [41]

    De- fect solitons in kagome optical lattices

    Xing Zhu, Hong Wang, and Li-Xian Zheng. De- fect solitons in kagome optical lattices. Opt. Express , 18(20):20786–20792, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    Surface line defect soli- tons in square optical lattice

    Zhien Lu and Zhi-Ming Zhang. Surface line defect soli- tons in square optical lattice. Opt. Express, 19(3):2410– 2416, 2011

    2011

  35. [43]

    Two-dimensional line defect lattice solitons in non- linear fractional schr¨ odinger equation.Opt

    Shengyao Wang, Weijun Chen, Wenjie Liu, De Song, Xueyan Han, Liankai Wang, Shuang Liu, and Mingshan Liu. Two-dimensional line defect lattice solitons in non- linear fractional schr¨ odinger equation.Opt. Laser Tech- nol., 175:110870, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Floquet defect solitons

    Sergey K Ivanov, Yaroslav V Kartashov, and Vladimir V Konotop. Floquet defect solitons. Opt. Lett. , 46(21):5364–5367, 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Shaping solitons by lat- tice defects

    Liangwei Dong and Fangwei Ye. Shaping solitons by lat- tice defects. Phys. Rev. A , 82(5):053829, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    Two-dimensional gap soli- tons in cubic-quintic nonlinear media with pt-symmetric lattices and fractional diffraction

    Xing Zhu, Milivoj R Beli´ c, Dumitru Mihalache, Dan Xiang, and Liangwei Zeng. Two-dimensional gap soli- tons in cubic-quintic nonlinear media with pt-symmetric lattices and fractional diffraction. Eur. Phys. J. Plus , 139(12):1116, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Dark gap solitons in bichromatic optical superlattices under cubic– quintic nonlinearities

    Junbo Chen, Dumitru Mihalache, Milivoj R Beli´ c, Jincheng Shi, Danfeng Zhu, Dingnan Deng, Shaobin Qiu, 8 Riwei Liao, Xing Zhu, and Liangwei Zeng. Dark gap solitons in bichromatic optical superlattices under cubic– quintic nonlinearities. Chaos, 34(11), 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    Solitons in composite linear– nonlinear moir´ e lattices

    Liangwei Zeng, Boris A Malomed, Dumitru Mihalache, Jingzhen Li, and Xing Zhu. Solitons in composite linear– nonlinear moir´ e lattices. Opt. Lett. , 49(24):6944–6947, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Two-dimensional gap soli- tons supported by a parity-time-symmetric optical lattice with saturable nonlinearity and fractional-order diffrac- tion

    Xing Zhu, Milivoj R Beli´ c, Dumitru Mihalache, Dan Xiang, and Liangwei Zeng. Two-dimensional gap soli- tons supported by a parity-time-symmetric optical lattice with saturable nonlinearity and fractional-order diffrac- tion. Opt. Laser Technol. , 184:112426, 2025

    2025

  42. [50]

    Solitary wave pulses in optical fibers with nor- mal dispersion and higher-order effects

    Wen-Jun Liu, Bo Tian, Hai-Qiang Zhang, Tao Xu, and He Li. Solitary wave pulses in optical fibers with nor- mal dispersion and higher-order effects. Phys. Rev. A , 79(6):063810, 2009

    2009

  43. [51]

    Dispersive waves emitted by solitons perturbed by third-order dispersion inside optical fibers

    Samudra Roy, Shyamal Kumar Bhadra, and Govind P Agrawal. Dispersive waves emitted by solitons perturbed by third-order dispersion inside optical fibers. Phys. Rev. A, 79(2):023824, 2009

    2009

  44. [52]

    High-order disper- sion stabilizes dark dissipative solitons in all-fiber cavi- ties

    Mustapha Tlidi and Lendert Gelens. High-order disper- sion stabilizes dark dissipative solitons in all-fiber cavi- ties. Opt. Lett., 35(3):306–308, 2010

    2010

  45. [53]

    Local- ized beating between dynamically generated frequencies

    Gregory Kozyreff, Mustapha Tlidi, Arnaud Mussot, Eric Louvergneaux, Majid Taki, and AG Vladimirov. Local- ized beating between dynamically generated frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 102(4):043905, 2009

    2009

  46. [54]

    Impact of fourth-order dispersion in the spectra of polarization-modulational instability in highly nonlinear fibers

    MN Zambo Abou’ou, P Tchofo Dinda, CM Ngabireng, S Pitois, and B Kibler. Impact of fourth-order dispersion in the spectra of polarization-modulational instability in highly nonlinear fibers. Phys. Rev. A, 87(3):033803, 2013

    2013

  47. [55]

    Self-similar propagation of optical pulses in fibers with positive quar- tic dispersion

    Antoine FJ Runge, Tristram J Alexander, Joseph New- ton, Pranav A Alavandi, Darren D Hudson, Andrea Blanco-Redondo, and C Martijn de Sterke. Self-similar propagation of optical pulses in fibers with positive quar- tic dispersion. Opt. Lett., 45(13):3365–3368, 2020

    2020

  48. [56]

    Dynamics of localized dissipative structures in a generalized lugiato– lefever model with negative quartic group-velocity dis- persion

    O Melchert, A Yulin, and A Demircan. Dynamics of localized dissipative structures in a generalized lugiato– lefever model with negative quartic group-velocity dis- persion. Opt. Lett., 45(10):2764–2767, 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Band gaps and lattice solitons for the higher-order nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation with a periodic potential

    Justin T Cole and Ziad H Musslimani. Band gaps and lattice solitons for the higher-order nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation with a periodic potential. Phys. Rev. A , 90(1):013815, 2014

    2014

  50. [58]

    Quartic and dipole solitons in a highly dispersive optical waveguide with self- steepening nonlinearity and varying parameters

    Vladimir I Kruglov and Houria Triki. Quartic and dipole solitons in a highly dispersive optical waveguide with self- steepening nonlinearity and varying parameters. Phys. Rev. A, 102(4):043509, 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Generation of dissipative solitons in a doped optical fiber modeled by the higher-order disper- sive cubic-quintic-septic complex ginzburg-landau equa- tion

    Dieudonn´ e Zanga, Serge I Fewo, Conrad B Tabi, and Timol´ eon C Kofan´ e. Generation of dissipative solitons in a doped optical fiber modeled by the higher-order disper- sive cubic-quintic-septic complex ginzburg-landau equa- tion. Phys. Rev. A , 105(2):023502, 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    Gap solitons in parity-time-symmetric mixed linear-nonlinear optical lattices with fourth-order diffraction

    Xing Zhu, Zhiwei Shi, and Huagang Li. Gap solitons in parity-time-symmetric mixed linear-nonlinear optical lattices with fourth-order diffraction. Opt. Commun. , 382:455–461, 2017

    2017

  53. [61]

    CGL Tiofack, F II Ndzana, Alidou Mohamadou, and Timoleon Crepin Kofane. Spatial solitons and stability in the one-dimensional and the two-dimensional gener- alized nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation with fourth-order diffraction and parity-time-symmetric potentials. Phys. Rev. E...

    2018

  54. [62]

    Gap solitons supported by two-dimensional parity-time-symmetric optical lattices in saturable media with fourth-order diffraction

    Xing Zhu, Wanwei Che, Zhongli Wu, Jiaquan Xie, and Yingji He. Gap solitons supported by two-dimensional parity-time-symmetric optical lattices in saturable media with fourth-order diffraction. J. Opt., 22(3):035503, 2020

    2020

  55. [63]

    Dark gap solitons in one-dimensional nonlinear periodic media with fourth-order dispersion

    Jiawei Li, Yanpeng Zhang, and Jianhua Zeng. Dark gap solitons in one-dimensional nonlinear periodic media with fourth-order dispersion. Chaos, Solitons Fractals , 157:111950, 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    Gap solitons in pt-symmetric optical lattices with higher-order diffraction

    Lijuan Ge, Ming Shen, Chunlan Ma, Taocheng Zang, and Lu Dai. Gap solitons in pt-symmetric optical lattices with higher-order diffraction. Opt. Express , 22(24):29435– 29444, 2014

    2014

  57. [65]

    Suppression of sym- metry breaking bifurcation of solitons by fourth-order diffraction in a parity-time symmetric potential

    Melis Turgut and ˙Ilkay Bakırta¸ s. Suppression of sym- metry breaking bifurcation of solitons by fourth-order diffraction in a parity-time symmetric potential. Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 186:115260, 2024

    2024

  58. [66]

    Berry phases in electronic structure theory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators

    David Vanderbilt. Berry phases in electronic structure theory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.