Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Line-of-Sight Velocity Projection Impact on the Local Group Mass

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.16991 v1 pith:BCRKZHFR submitted 2025-04-23 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.IMgr-qc

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COastro-ph.IMgr-qc
keywords massmodelgalaxyinfallvelocitycorrectionscosmologicalestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The mass of the Local Group (LG), comprising the Milky Way (MW), Andromeda (M31), and their satellites, is crucial for validating galaxy formation and cosmological models. Traditional virial mass estimates, which rely on line-of-sight (LoS) velocities and simplified infall assumptions, are prone to systematic biases due to unobserved velocity components and anisotropic kinematics. Using the TNG cosmological simulation, we examine two limiting cases: the \underline{minor infall} model -- ignoring perpendicular velocities to the LoS directions) and the \underline{major infall} model -- assuming purely radial motion towards the Center of Mass (CoM). Our simulations demonstrate that geometric corrections are vital: the minor-infall model underestimates the true mass, while the major-infall model overestimates it. By applying these calibrated corrections to observed dwarf galaxy kinematics within 1 Mpc of the LG's CoM, we derive a refined LG mass of $M_{\mathrm{LG}} = (2.99 \pm 0.60) \times 10^{12}\, M_\odot$. This finding aligns with predictions from the $\Lambda$CDM model, timing arguments, and independent mass estimates, resolving previous discrepancies. Our analysis highlights the importance of correcting for velocity anisotropy and offers a robust framework for dynamical mass estimation in galaxy groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Galaxy infall models for arbitrary velocity directions

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Standard infall models are unreliable for individual galaxy radial velocities, but their velocity dispersions provide useful upper and lower bounds.

Pith tools